Check Lock Entries

Hi Friends,
I have run two programs simultaneously updating same table.I want to chaek whether there is any lock that has occured.I have no authorization for SM12.Is there any table or other transaction to check whether the table is locked.

Hi!
The programs should set lock entries before making a change and releasing the lock immediately afterwards. When this is the case, you could see locks in SM12, but more for information purpose - because the programs are doing well on their own.
If one (or both) programs don't use locks, then you won't see anything in SM12 and you might get a mess in the database - depends on the actual changes.
(IMHO) Locks aren't stored in a table, it's more organized like a global memory -> that's faster and locks don't need to be stored for a long time anyway.
Transaction would be SM12 - and anyway, any other transaction would check the same authority object...
Regards,
Christian

Similar Messages

Lock entry in RPM

Hi,
How can I check lock entries in RPM?
Is there any function module through which I can identify the user who has currently locked a particular review object?
When I am clicking on particular review then the system is showing a message that an user has processed the particular review.I want to get the user through programming.Is there any way out?
Thanks in advance,
Sourav

seems you are not using the call correctly.
    CALL FUNCTION 'ENQUEUE_ENQ_CGPL_PROJECT'
      EXPORTING
        mode_cgpl_project_enq = 'E'
        application           = 'PPM'
        external_id           = <id>
        _scope                = <scope>
      EXCEPTIONS
        foreign_lock          = 1
        system_failure        = 2.
above call will set sy-subrc to 1 if exclusive lock has already been set.
Edited by: Alok Kumar on Aug 11, 2011 9:57 AM

Lock entries in RPM

Hi,
How can I check lock entries in RPM?
Is there any function module through which I can identify the user who has currently locked a particular review object?
When I am clicking on particular review then the system is showing a message that an user has processed the particular review.I want to get the user through programming.Is there any way out?
Thanks in advance,
Sourav

seems you are not using the call correctly.
    CALL FUNCTION 'ENQUEUE_ENQ_CGPL_PROJECT'
      EXPORTING
        mode_cgpl_project_enq = 'E'
        application           = 'PPM'
        external_id           = <id>
        _scope                = <scope>
      EXCEPTIONS
        foreign_lock          = 1
        system_failure        = 2.
above call will set sy-subrc to 1 if exclusive lock has already been set.
Edited by: Alok Kumar on Aug 11, 2011 9:57 AM

How to check the Lock Entries Dynamically

Hi
I have a list of Objects in an internal table and i want to know which one of these objects are locked by another users.
I am using SAP standard Lock object 'EPNODE' and its FM 'ENQUEUE_EPNODE ' to Lock the entries.
Please suggest how i can find among a list of objects, which one are locked.
Please suggest any transparent table which hold lock entries or any Function Module which check for lock entries.
Thanks in adavance

Hi
Just double click on the FM, it will take you to SE37
click on IMPORT tab there you find import parameters against which there is the associated type
you need to declare your variables(parameteres) according to these associated types
whatever the FM it may be, the process is same
Hope this would solve your problem
Regards
Ramchander Rao.k

Lock entries appearing again after deleting

Hi,
I am deleting some old lock entries in SM12 but i dont know how , deleted entries are appearing again back. Can you please suggest how to tackle this problem.
Thanks

Hello....
Just after deleting once it will rpompt are you really want to delete say yes..
and Also check the SM04 tcode whether this is still present then hoppe this will solve ...
Sas

Other solution for locked entries in smq2

Hello everyone. Good day!
I have two entries in smq2 that are not moving. However, the status text indicates that they are running. 2 hours has elapsed since the entries started not to move. I have tried unlocking the queues and resetting the message causing the block. After resetting the message, the status text became Object Requested is Currently Locked by User. Thus, I deleted the locked entry in sm12. After deleting, I reset the entries again, then the status was changed to running but the entries are still not moving.
It seems that the steps I performed above do not work. So, my next step is to look at sm37 if there is a failing job. But I found none. I also checked sm59 to see if there is a connection problem with our Java server. But the connection is fine.
Do you have other ideas on how to solve this?
Thanks in advance!

Me too not sure, how to check in SMQ2.:-(
We ca do this in SXMB_MONI. Here you will find your msg with green flag.
Here there will be a column for queue name. If you click on this it will take you to the screenyou see from SMQ2. In SXMB_MONI, there will be a column which says PE/AE. If it is PE then the msg corresponds to a BPM. Click on PE to know about the steps completed in the BPM.
Regards,
Jai Shankar

About lock entries

hi all,
I have seen lock entries in sm12. tables are ATPENQ,VBAK. so what should i do?
please help in this regard.
regards
praveen

The purpose of lock management is to monitor the lock logic of your system. You can determine the locks that are currently set. Locks for which the backup flag is set (because they have already been transferred to the update task) are highlighted.
This enables you to detect and rectify problems, for example, by deleting locks that are no longer required.
You can display lock entries according to the following criteria
        Table in which rows are locked
         Lock entry argument
        Client
        User who set the lock
This corresponds to the entries in the lock table.
The lock entries are shown in different colors:
Blue means that the locks have already been transferred to the update task, with the result that the backup flag is set. These locks are also rewritten to the lock table when the enqueue server is restarted.
Black means that the lock (still) belongs to the dialog owner. The backup flag is not set.
By choosing Edit - > Sort by, you can display the locks according to user, time, table, or host system (host).
By double-clicking a lock entry, you can display detailed information, including the host name and number of the SAP System in which the lock was generated.
What should you do first if a problem arises?
Use the diagnosis functions:
sm12 Extras - >Diagnosis and then
sm12 Extras - >Diagnosis in update
If a problem is reported, back up the trace files dev_w, dev_disp, dev_eq and check the Syslog.
Hope this would help you in understanding SAP lock management.
Pls Reward points if useful.
Regards
Sree

Double-Checked Locking

Hey everyone,
I posted a blog entry using Double-Checked Locking. Later one, Ryan commented to me that DCL does not work. See
http://jroller.com/page/davinci/?anchor=lazy_initialization_with_less_pain
I never knew that. Anyway, in a small efford to fix this I came up with the following code. Now one of the articles stated that many clever people already tried to fix the problem, and since I don't think I'm that smart, I guess this code also doesn't work. Can anyone explain to me why the following code could go wrong on some JVM's and platforms?
private class Singeton {
private static Singleton SINGLETON;
private static boolean initialized;
public static Singleton getInstance() {
     if (!initialized) {
       synchronized (Singleton.class) {
         if (SINLETON == null) {
           SINGLETON = new Singleton();
       initialized = true;
     return SINGLETON;
}Thanks,
Vincent

Okay, this migth seem like a load of... well, you
know, but in this case I force the JVM to initialize
the object before setting the boolean to true, or
not?Did you read the link I posted?
"The most obvious reason it doesn't work it that the writes that initialize the Helper object and the write to the helper field can be done or perceived out of order. Thus, a thread which invokes getHelper() could see a non-null reference to a helper object, but see the default values for fields of the helper object, rather than the values set in the constructor.
If the compiler inlines the call to the constructor, then the writes that initialize the object and the write to the helper field can be freely reordered if the compiler can prove that the constructor cannot throw an exception or perform synchronization.
Even if the compiler does not reorder those writes, on a multiprocessor the processor or the memory system may reorder those writes, as perceived by a thread running on another processor. "
Your code still fails. There is no known solution to the problem (if you can't create the singleton during declaration time)
/Kaj

System Blocks transactions through LOCK entries

Hi Experts,
I am try to create PO with reference to PR i have created PR and i am trying to create PO and i have entered cost center but system is throwing error."Cost center XXXx/xxxx does not exist" . but i have checked the cost center validity period where as validity period is 01.04.2013 to 31.12.9999. even i checked the controlling area as well every thing is proper. later i observed lock entries in SM12 for the EBAN,MARM.i felt issue is with lock entries because same cost center i have entered in purchase requestion there it didn't throw any error, why system is stopping transactions with lock entries how to stop lock entries& is there any configuration to stop lock entries. anyone guide me every day i am facing the same issue please help me to avoid this.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Diwakar

Hi
thanks for response
i have checked controlling area & company code every thing is perfect and i have checked validity period and status of cost center as well every thing is perfect. i seriously don't understand
why system is not allowing create PO and same cost center i have entered in purchase re question but system didn't throw any error.i have created PR with same cost center but when i am trying to create PO system is not allowing..
Regards,
Diwa

How to delete lock entries generated by the function module "BAPI_OBJCL_CHANGE"

Hi experts,
I'm now trying to make an add-on program
which updates material master information by the background job.
To update the "Classification" view of material master,
the program calls the function module "BAPI_OBJCL_CHANGE".
If the "RETURN" information is valid,
then the program calls "BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT" (with the "wait" parameter 'X').
Contrary to my intention,
lock entries generated by the function module "BAPI_OBJCL_CHANGE" remains after "BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT".
As a result, the material updated remains locked until the add-on processing ends.
To shoot this trouble, I read some SCN discussions below:
<<lock unlock record>>
⇒ As I wrote above, I checked the parameter for "BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT".
<<BAPI_OBJCL_CHANGE Lock Error !>>
⇒ I cannot call the function module "BAPI_OBJCL_CHANGE" with "IN UPDATE TASK" option
because of "BAPI_OBJCL_CHANGE" attributes.
("BAPI_OBJCL_CHANGE" is not a "Update Module".)
How can I delete lock entries generated by the function module "BAPI_OBJCL_CHANGE" ?
Thanks in advance.
Tom

I quess/hope you want to remove locks in you caller program and not locks required by the update task processing to insure database consistencies...
Did you use the WAIT option in the commit FM, else if there are no other locks in your called program a call of FM DEQUEUE_ALL could solve your problem.
Regards,
Raymond

Show lock entries of a program / include

Hi abap-comunity,
before editing a customer-program i want to know whether there are lock entries, no matter which include is involved. Of course i could check each include used in the program separately by checking the version-management functionality. The question is, is there a quicker and more comfortable way?
I wonder, if anyone knows? For sure......
Thanks in advance! Looking forward to your reply.
Gunther

Hi Gunther,
adding to what Naredran said:
You may use function module to get the includes:
      call function 'GET_INCLUDES'
           exporting
                progname = irdir-name
           tables
                incltab = itab_ii.
You may write a small program:
Select programs from TRDIR or TADIR
get includes using FM
get transport requests for all objects from E071.
Check Release status (and user) of transports in E070.
Regards,
Clemens

Current Session Lock Entries

Hi,
I want to read the locked objects, which are locked in other sessions other than the current session.
I don't need current session locking entries.
I tried with fm ENQUEUE_READ but it is giving all locked entries including current sesstion.
Any info on this.
Thanks
aRs

Hi,
I am facing the same sitauation but SM30 does lock by considering parallal sessions by same user.But it uses VIEW_ENQUEUE to check the locks.
So SAP does tracks locks by sessions.I hope i am right here in saying this.
Manish.
Message was edited by:
Manish Verma

LOCK Entry List

Hi Experts!
Is it OK if SM12's "LOCK Entry List" looks like as follows:
Some tables are appearing at least twice ore more with the lock mode E.
Is it acceptable.
Please give me a hint, is it possible that such a scenario may cause
an error output
Some of the selected &1 are being processed
*see se91
Error Type: E
Id: C$
Message Number: 162
Thanks
sas erdem
011     Thealy     21:19:47     E     CCIHT_ACH     01100000000000000153354####################     1     0
011     Thealy     21:19:47     E     CCIHT_IP     01100000000000000153325####################     1     0
011     Thealy     21:19:47     E     CCIHT_IPEVA     01100000000000000153326####################     1     0
011     Thealy     21:19:47     E     ESTDF     01100000000000000153354####################     1     0
011     Thealy     21:26:00     E     CCIHT_IAL     01100000000000000153354####################     1     1
011     Thealy     21:26:00     E     CCIHT_IHVA     01100000000000000153354####################     1     1
011     Thealy     21:26:00     E     CCIHT_IP     01100000000000000153354####################     2     1
011     Thealy     21:26:00     S     KSSKX     011100YXE_RET_MAL_0010 O0000000000000015355700000000000000004348     0     3
011     Thealy     21:26:00     S     KSSKX     011100YXE_RET_MAL_0089    O0000000000000015355800000000000000004349     0     3
011     Thealy     00:38:27     E     CCIHT_IP     01100000000000000153325####################     1     0
011     Thealy     00:38:27     E     CCIHT_IP     01100000000000000153354####################     1     0
011     Thealy     00:38:27     E     CCIHT_IP     01100000000000000153358####################     1     0
011     Thealy     00:38:27     E     CCIHT_IPEVA     01100000000000000153326####################     1     0
011     Thealy     00:38:27     E     CCIHT_IPEVA     01100000000000000153375####################     1     0
011     Thealy     01:16:56     E     CCIHT_ACH     01100000000000000153015####################     1     1
011     Thealy     01:16:56     E     CCIHT_IAL     01100000000000000153015####################     1     1
011     Thealy     01:16:56     E     CCIHT_IHVA     01100000000000000153015####################     1     1
011     Thealy     01:16:56     E     CCIHT_IP     01100000000000000153015####################     2     1
011     Thealy     01:16:56     E     CCIHT_IPEVA     01100000000000000153016####################     2     1
011     Thealy     01:16:56     E     CCIHT_IPEVA     01100000000000000153017####################     2     1
011     Thealy     01:16:56     E     CCIHT_IPEVA     01100000000000000153018####################     2     1
011     Thealy     01:16:56     E     ESTDF     01100000000000000153015####################     1     1

There can be 2 entries in SM12 for same table. But if you check the record which is locked, it will be different.
There can be row level locks on tables.
If you are trying to edit the 'record' of a table listed in SM12, which is locked, then it should give an error.
Try accessing some other record of the same table, it should not cause any issue.

Lock entry deleted manually

Hi all,
In my sm21 log i found lock entry deleted manually. I didnt deleted any lock for this user and user too dont have sm12 in his profile.
I would like to know about this user. Is there any log file is there ican find deleted locks and who deleted that lock?
Thanks in advance
Time      Type   Nr    Clt    User   TCode Priority   Grp N Text
14:33:12 DIA 001 900 130106 J1IEX                 GE O Lock entry deleted manually: Transaction J1IEX
Details Page 2 Line 13 System Log: Local Analysis of ECCAPP2                  1
Time     Type Nr Clt User   TCode Grp N Text
14:33:12 DIA 001 900 130106 J1IEX GE O Lock entry deleted manually: Transaction J1IEX
Lock entry deleted manually: Transaction J1IEX
Details
Recording at local and central time........................ 14.07.2011 14:33:12
Task...... Process                     User...... Terminal Session TCode Program   Cl Problem cl      Packag
22602      Dialog work process No. 001 130106     Shashi_S       1 J1IEX SAPLJ1IEX S Operation Trace SENQ

hi All,
i am also getting the same error "Lock entry deleted manually: Transaction J1IEX" daily. except me no one has authorization to SM12. i checked Stad no luck, COuld some one help me on this.
Note: there are no lock entrys in SM12.
12:43:21 DIA 021 100 <user Name>    J1IE           GE O Lock entry deleted manually: Transaction J1IEX
12:43:21 DIA 021 100 <user Name>    J1IE           GE O Lock entry deleted manually: J_1IEXCDTL E
12:43:21 DIA 021 100 <user Name>    J1IE           GE O Lock entry deleted manually: J_1IEXCHDR E
12:46:06 DIA 033 100 <user Name>    J1IE           GE O Lock entry deleted manually: Transaction J1IEX
12:46:06 DIA 033 100 <user Name>    J1IE           GE O Lock entry deleted manually: J_1IEXCDTL E
12:46:06 DIA 033 100 <user Name>    J1IE           GE O Lock entry deleted manually: J_1IEXCHDR E
12:46:27 DIA 022 100 <user Name>    J1IE           GE O Lock entry deleted manually: Transaction J1IEX
12:46:27 DIA 022 100 <user Name>    J1IE           GE O Lock entry deleted manually: J_1IEXCDTL E
12:46:27 DIA 022 100 <user Name>    J1IE           GE O Lock entry deleted manually: J_1IEXCHDR E
12:47:07 DIA 019 100 <user Name>    J1IE           GE O Lock entry deleted manually: Transaction J1IEX
12:47:07 DIA 019 100 <user Name>    J1IE           GE O Lock entry deleted manually: J_1IEXCDTL E
12:47:07 DIA 019 100 <user Name>    J1IE           GE O Lock entry deleted manually: J_1IEXCHDR E

Time evaluation generate check out entry

Dear Gurus,
How can we generate Check out entries thru Time evaluation?
The sales employees come to office in the morning, they punch in and leave for sales activity. They don't get overtime, but pay / absence quota deducted if they don't check in in the system.
While running Time evaluation, I am getting error in TE03 (delimiting error). I hv tried creating second entry using TF00. Its not working. Has anybody any solution for this?
Regards,
Vijay

Hi Gurus,
I am rephrasing my requirements. have 2 queries,
1. Sales Employees make only Clock In entries. System should generate the clock out entry or should not throw any error message. System should consider total working time from daily work schedule.
   - TE30 function is generated the entry in TEVEN table based on planned end time, but we need to create the entry in IT2012 otherwise, while processing next days entry, it generates error.
   - Will TF00 create an entry in Time Events IT2051 ? IF yes, how can I tweak TF00 rule to generate Time out entry.
2. General Staff working hours need to be calculated from Shift Start even if they come early. Max working time is 12 hours with 4hrs from start of end of Shift period
   - If shift start is 7AM, I have defining Start tolerance as 6AM to 7:05AM, but still the system is considering the Clock In time for hours worked.
I have to write this condition. How to write ?
   If Clock-in Time < Start Time
      Then   TIP->From = Start Time
I believe it has to be put in TL10 after rounding the Check in & check outs.. so as to update table TIP,
Please suggest,
Regards,
Vijay

Check Lock Entries

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for