Choices in Expanding My Processing Power

Hi,
I'm considering choices in expanding my processing power. Unlike those
who only own Logic Pro (which only works if a dongle is inserted), I own
Logic Express and I have upgraded to Logic Pro. This means, when considering
the equation for expanding my processing power, that one option is to buy
a new Macintosh computer and install Logic Express on it and use this
external computer as an external musical instrument.
So, there appears to be two ways to expand my meager G4, 1.5 gigs,
Mac OS 10.4.8 system:
1. I can buy an external box, probably one that plays EXS-24 samples, or
2. I can buy another Macintosh computer (probably a lower-end computer,
but it would have 1.5 to 2.0 gigs of memory, it would have at least one
intel duo processor).
Does anyone have any suggestions on how they've expanded their system
to perform more musical instruments in the orchestra? Specifically, I'd
probably off-load my Garritan Orchestral Strings (using the lite versions)
to this new outboard box or computer as EXS-24 samples.
Are there any surprises in store? For instance, if I buy an outboard,
non-computer, but an actual sampler-player, is it relatively easy to copy
ESX-24 samples that my Mac has converted from gigastudio format
to this external musical playing box?
Right now, I'm leaning towards simply buying another Mac and installing
Logic Express on it. Since Logic Express has a Channel Splitter in the
environment, I should at least be able to get 16 articulations out of this
one Mac computer.
Thanks,
Sys6
P.S.
Jonathan, thanks for your response to
http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=3436479
I will in the relatively near future, have more questions, as I investigate
in more detail your ideas. Thanks much.

Hi,
Since I posted this question, I've been reading pertinent sections
from Paul Gilreath's The Guide to MIDI Orchestration, 3rd Edition.
I'd like to restrict my above question to an "older" set-up. That is,
assume that I will buy an external computer to use as an out-board
player (that is, it will respond to MIDI and create the sounds of, say,
the string section); and, assume that I will be using MIDI interfaces
or USB MIDI interfaces to carry the MIDI signals. All audio signals, both
from my main, old computer and the new external playing-computer
will go to simple mixer and then out to my speakers. Keep in mind that
this set-up is just for live, fast feed-back while composing (bouncing
is quite a time consumer).
So, do any of you out there use an extra computer (or two) simply
to play back more sounds? Or, do you primarily just bounce within
Logic using one computer?
And, this is my fundamental question:
If you bought a new computer, what brand, and what software would
you run on it?
My virtual orchestra is gradually growing and now consists of the
following:
Apple's JamPack Orchestra (but, as I explore, I find it not a real solution).
Westgate Studios: Woodwind Collection, Expanded Edition, $200
Garritan Orchestral Strings: I use the lite patches to save memory and
processing power)
Pro Sessions Orchestral Brass (based on $1,000 Sonic Implants brass), but is a much reduced edition for only about $100 (and has limited solo instruments).
Apple's EXS24 trumpet and trombone.
Westgate Studio's free Trumpet I downloaded.
However, even the above "low-endish" orchestra uses up more computer
processing power than I have if I want to hear the orchestral score "live"
(that is, in real time as I write the music).
Thanks,
Sys6

Similar Messages

  • How much ram and processing power in my imac will meet my graphic design needs?

    Hi,
    I'm in the market for a new imac. I'm trying to figure out how much ram I'll need and which processor will be sufficient for my graphic design needs.
    I'm gonna need it to be robust enough to have InDesign, Photoshop, and Illustrator open at once along with spotify, safari with many tabs open, and a couple other apps including evernote and game from time to time. Also, I'm gonna be managing a good deal of fonts in font explorer. How much ram and processing power will I need in my imac to keep everything snappy with all these apps going at the same time?
    Any advice on this would be much appreciated. Feel free to include any other relevant information you think I should know.
    Thanks, Nick

    Computers are out of date when you open the box
    Ok, getting serious, that iMac should be a viable workhorse for what you want for a good five years, and taht depends on how much ram you put in it, add really fast external storage, and so on.
    Didn't throw this in earlier so as to not influence the discussion: my daughter is the senior art director, VP, at a graphics design firm in NYC.  Has been in the business for a number of years.  When she changed out her Mac at work, bought, or company bought, the 27" iMac model just before the latest, with maxed out CPU/GPU, and storage.  They maxed the memory to 32 GB for her, then added a 30" Apple cinema display so she has almost 5' of display in front of her.  There is nothing she cannot have open all spread across that display area.  She works almost exclusively in print media, occassionally condescends to do web stuff.  And has a massive array of RAID drives hanging on it.  But that is a setup an individual would be hard pressed to go with.
    At home she uses a MacBook Pro with top cpu and display but that is all.
    The point, just how massive do you want to go depends on how fast you have to work; in the office where time is money you need tons of horsepower.  At home, you scale it to your abilitty to juggle other tasks at the same time.
    I think your choices have been great, the discussion has focused on what is important and especially what can and cannot be changed in the future.
    Best of luck setting this up.

  • Is it possible to "borrow" the processing power from a second mac

    I have a G4 Laptop 1.25ghz which just doesn't quite offer enough processing power to do what I want in Garage Band.
    I've just purchased a mini 1.83 ghz duo and I'm wondering if it's possible to run garage band on my laptop and "borrow" processing power from the mini (or vice versa).
    I could have sworn that an apple salesman told me a couple of months ago when I began to think about getting the mini that it was possible to do that...?

    GB doesn't offer any support for "Render Farm" type set ups. I think Logic may.
    ~~HangTime [♪♫ The Bullets and Bones Band ♫♪] B-(>

  • Greetings from a Photoshop Newbie. I need a computer, preferably a Mac laptop, with some serious processing power. I take photos with a Pentax 645Z; files are 50MB raw. I upload from Adobe Bridge and manipulate the photo, sometimes turning them into files

    Greetings from a Photoshop Newbie. I need a computer, preferably a Mac laptop, with some serious processing power. I take photos with a Pentax 645Z; files are 50MB raw. I upload from Adobe Bridge and manipulate the photo, sometimes turning them into files in excess of 250MB. I cannot resize as the large files are needed for enlargements. Have all sorts of problems trying to manipulate, add effects and saving most large files. I need some serious processing power. Can anyone suggest what Mac i should purchase? I thank you in advance for your help :-)

    It sounds as if you're having some system-related problems now, unrelated to processing power as such. In particular, a buggy video driver can cause everything to slow to a crawl.
    Medium format files are big, true, but not so big as to cause significant slowdowns on a normally functioning and reasonably current computer. A laptop will always be slower than a well-equipped desktop system, though. Mac vs PC plays no part in this, performance is unrelated to platform.
    Bottlenecks are different in ACR and Photoshop, so that should give you a clue. ACR is computing-intensive and mostly limited by CPU speed. Photoshop, however, is mostly bandwidth-intensive and mainly limited by memory and disk throughput. It's also sensitive to GPU issues.

  • Can i use a g3 imac for extra processing power

    hello, can i use an imca g3 graphite to supplement by g5 1.6 model. if so, how? i am using logic and am running into serious processing problems....is there anything i can do to make sure i am using the processing power of the g5 to the max?
    thaqnks

    First and foremost, make sure that Logic (and the 3rd party stuff) are the only thngs running on your desktop (ie, no Dashboard apps in the background, no iTunes, no iPhoto, etc, etc).
    Second, when you do use a 3rd party plug in, make it sound as close to accurate as you want, then bounce that track and reimport it as a plain audio track (much less processing power need to play the audio track than to apply effects in real time). You can always go back and fine tune later.
    Third, Sculpture and Sound Designer are HUGE CPU hogs. Use them sparingly or in the case of Sculpture, bounce the track or freeze it.
    Those will release a lot of processor cycles and move you on your way to better performance from your machine.
    Good Luck!
    X

  • Why do the new retina MacBook pros have less processing power than the older models? I am looking to get one, which needs to be powerful.

    I noticed that the new MacBook pros with retina displays have less processing power, and memory that then older non retina 15 inch. Why is that?

    Are you perhaps talking about a similarly spec'd 15" current gen non-retina against a 15" current retina?  If so, then yes, there is a very small subtle difference when benchmarks are measured.  It's possible that Apple is downclocking the chips just a tad to keep temperatures in check, but at the same time, it could also be all the extra pixels taking up more processing power and causing the small difference.
    I too have seen the same articles from benchmarking websites when the retinas came out.

  • PE's processing power compared to Premiere Pro CS6

    I'm about to upgrade from Premiere Elements 4 and get a new Windows computer specifically for video editing. I'm happy with PE’s editing features, but the editing and burning process is much too slow. I’m sure a faster processor, more RAM, and better video card would help. Since I’m upgrading for speed, I’ve done a little research and found out about Pro’s Mercury Playback Engine, CUDA processing (with the right graphics card), and even read about the benefits of a Solid State hard drive. Before investing in all that expensive hardware, I’d like to know how PE’s processing and encoding system compares to that of Premiere Pro CS6. With optimal systems for each program, how does their processing power translate into length of time to encode per minute of video? Unless Pro is a whole lot faster, I don't think I can justify the extra expense for the software and hardware.
    I understand PE 11 can run as a 64 bit application, but is it multithreaded? I've looked at the system requirements for PE 11, but I think what is listed is the minimum--what are the maximum specs without going over what it's capable of utilizing? Thanks for providing the information that will help me decide how much upgrading to do.

    PPro makes use of the (more expensive) CUDA cores in an nVidia card... PreElements does not, so an ATI card works just fine... at least 512Meg of video ram, or 1Gig if you edit large pictures with Photoshop or Photoshop Elements (my thoughts on video ram, not official specifications)
    Do what you will with this list, but this is what I would build for 64bit PreElements 11
    Intel i7 3770 CPU
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116502
    Motherboard
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813121599
    16Gig Ram
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820148466
    Mid-Tower Case
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811129042
    550w Power Supply
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817171038
    500Gig Drive
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136769
    Install Windows and all software
    1Terabyte Drive
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822236339
    Use for project files and media (video & sound) and temp files
    ATI 5450 1Gig
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102882
    More $$$ nVidia not needed, only Ppro uses CUDA cores
    120mm x2 Case Fan
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835103060
    1 in front to cool drives, 1 in side to cool CPU and graphics adapter
    Keyboard & Mouse
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16823109232
    Sata DVD Writer
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16827135204
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16832116986
    Use Win7 64bit Home if you will NEVER go over 16gig ram
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16832116992
    Use Win7 64bit Pro to use more than 16gig ram

  • Not enough processing power?

    I got this tablet for the purpose of my kids being able to play abcmouse.com...but when I try to login to that account on my new ellipsis 7, the website says this device does not have enough processing power to use the website.  Can I get something done to the tablet so that it has the ability to access abcmouse.com? 

    Thanks. My girls also use zoodles and love it!  I went to the verizon store and by exploring, the guy found a settings button that we have to click to work on the desktop because it thinks it was on a mobile phone, not a tablet. So I'm happy to say it works as of today! Yay!
    Tiffany
    >> Personal information removed to comply with the Verizon Wireless Terms of Service <<
    Edited by:  Verizon Moderator

  • Time Machine uses huge amount of processing power

    When TM decides to do an incremental backup, the backupd process ***** up a huge amount of my processing power, typically upwards of 45%, causing severe delays and slowdown. Sometimes it's doing it in conjunction with mdworker, but not usually. Is there a way to make Time Machine less processor-intensive? It's really obnoxious.

    Stellertony wrote:
    When TM decides to do an incremental backup, the backupd process ***** up a huge amount of my processing power, typically upwards of 45%, causing severe delays and slowdown. Sometimes it's doing it in conjunction with mdworker, but not usually. Is there a way to make Time Machine less processor-intensive? It's really obnoxious.
    I have not noticed that, but it takes less than a minute on my machine, so I may have missed it.
    If you have a slow processor, it will certainly make a bigger "dent" on your system, but then, so does any major app or file transfer.
    I suppose it would be possible to give it higher positive nice level.

  • Computer processing power used by Apple mobile device

    In July I downloaded a new itunes version. Afterwards, whenever I srated my computer, the processing power was being used up by "Apple mobile device" on my task manager. I had to end the process inorder to use my computer. I reinstalled itunes, which cured the problem. However I had a real player update two days ago which has caused the same problem to reoccur. Any solutions/suggestions please?

    Try:
    iPhone, iPad, iPod touch: How to restart the Apple Mobile Device Service (AMDS) on Windows

  • Selected Track Getting More Processing Power?

    Hello,
    If I understand correctly, Logic 9 allocates more resources to a selected track than other tracks (if you have more than one). Could anyone elaborate on how this is implemented? Can I choose to turn off this feature and give the same processing power to all tracks/plugins?
    The reason I ask this is because my Korg M3 plug-in is not playing nice with Logic when the VI track with that particular plugin is not selected. If i select another track, the playback becomes out of sync with the rest of the project. However, if I select that track, everything is played back in time.
    -TC

    TCfromBN wrote:
    It's never been a problem for me before either. It's just with this one plug-in. Like the delay compensation isn't working on it,
    that perhaps it's an issue with logic and this particular implementation of 'virtualized' hardware.
    Ok, well it's true that Logic functions differently than most (if not all) other DAWS regarding it's handling of buffers. Most DAWs keep a Plugin or VI partially active when the sequencer is stopped. Logic does not, this is how Logic gets it's high efficiency rating, you can load up a project template with all of the plugins & VIs you would need to start a large project and there will be virtually no CPU resources used, as long as you have enough memory you're good to go.
    When you keep a plugin track selected... it is active or partially active, this allows the plug-in to initialize and clear it's buffers.
    It sounds like the Korg plugin is built on an older AU spec, since Logic does not keep plugins active it's now up to the plugin to initialize and clear it's own buffers when the sequencer is stopped, this means that they have to remain active for a time after Logic is stopped.
    A couple of developers I beta tested for cried foul because they learned about this after the plugins had been developed and tested as the original AU spec did not contain this information.
    Anyway, it sounds like it will be up to Korg to update the plugin to be compatible with Logic. The scenario you've described sounds like the Korg's buffers have not emptied or the plugin doesn't initialize unless the track is selected.
    pancenter-

  • Real processing power

    Just when we thought home PC CPUs were awesome. IBM is back and showing Intel what real stock clocks are all about. 
    This here is processing power; 5,5GHz from the factory. No OC Makes Intel Xeon look mediocre in terms of clock speeds.
    http://www.tomshardware.com/news/ibm-mainframe-server-z-power,16716.html

    For the entry level price of 75k lol

  • Dedicate Processing power..

    I have a strange problem. I am heavily into encoding, and sometimes when I'm encoding, I get speeds of 45fps to 50 fps which is pretty fast. But at night, I enqueue all my tasks and leave the laptop on for encoding. But the rates are much slower. The average comes down to 30fps.
    This has probed me into asking this question:
    Is it possible to dedicate the processor to a particular task or at least set the highest priority for that task such that I'll get more processing power and hence greater speed?
    I'm running Mac OS X 10.4.9

    Fiddling with priorities to get more out of a process only has an effect when there is contention with other processes.
    In other words, if the only thing that's going on overnight is your encoding process, priority isn't the issue.
    I'd watch Activity Monitor to get a better idea of what's going on.

  • NETserver, mDNSResponder, syslogd using up large processing power, why?

    Hello,
    For the past few weeks I've noticed about 150% processing power being used by three processes continuously. They are NETserver, mDNSResponder, and syslogd. They are using only 2 to 3 Mb of memory each but they keep the machine running hot and the fans going louder. I have rebooted and they go away for a while but then soon start up again. I did not notice this when I was running 10.6 and it seems to have started soon after I upgraded to 10.6.1. I have an 8 core Mac Pro.
    I read somewhere that Back to my Mac may be a culprit. I've rebooted the machine after turning that off to no avail.
    Any other advice? Anyone else having this problem.
    Thanks.

    I'm having the same problem. The NETserver process is consuming 70% of my CPU and has been for hours. This is a new development since, I think, I installed the latest patch to snow leopard. For what it's worth, I killed the Netserver process yesterday (via Activity Monitor), and the system continued to work normally. Still, it's annoying.
    I see that the process is owned by my user id - not root. So it is likely being launched by something I'm doing, though I don't know what that might be. However, I suspect it could be related to my Brother printer (MFC-490CW). It's a wireless printer/scanner, etc, and my Mac needs to listen for inbound connections from the scanner. I notice this problem seems to occur a few hours after I scan something.
    Of course, I could be completely wrong.

  • Hidden but still using processing power?

    Hey,
    In some sessions which have lots of tracks I might use the 'hide' function to keep the session tidy - some tracks I don't want to delete completely.
    What I would like to know is this...
    If the tracks are muted / plugins bypassed / instruments bypassed, does this then make them properly inactive and therefore, not using any RAM/processing power?
    Fro example, when you do this in Pro Tools, it cuts it out of the equation completely, so to speak.
    Cheers!

    In Logic 6 and 7, you could go right to what is now called the Inspector, and where it said "inst 01", you could select "off".
    This unloaded the instrument from RAM. What was REALLY useful though, is if you had gotten further along in your arrangement, and needed to adjust your MIDI part, you could simply go to where it said "off", and select "Inst 01" again. This would not only reload the instrument that was in there, but it even remembered modifications done to a preset (that hadn't necessarily been saved under a new name, like adjusting the decay of a patch).
    This functionality, whether intended or not, was eliminated in Logic 8. It is sorely missed...
    The only work around I know of, is to save channel strips that are song specific (as to not clutter up your library)

Maybe you are looking for