Cisco Nexus 5548UP

Hi
I need a switch that supports FC, FCoE and iSCSI traffic. The switch that has been suggested to us is Cisco Nexus 5548UP.
I have the following queries regarding this switch:
1)       At our end, I have AMS 2100 Hitachi Storage which has iSCSI & FC Ports. I also have Qlogic CNA card at the server end which supports both ISCSI & FCOE. For FCoE protocol based traffic, the storage to switch connection will have to be FC and the switch to server connection will be FCoE. Can you please confirm whether, if this will be possible through the proposed Cisco Nexus 5548UP switch?
2)       The specification for the Nexus 5548UP switch claims that it supports 10 Gigabit Ethernet. Can you please confirm if this relates to iSCSI support that the switch provides?
3)       We are going to use  -SFP-FC4G-SW & SFP-10G-SR SFP for fiber connectivity. Can you please let us know the what these SFP are used for and whether they assist in FC and FCoE traffic forwarding?
4)       We are also going to use Nexus 5500 Storage License, 8 Ports. Does this indicate that only 8 ports of the switch can be connected to the storage? Among these ports, can we configure 4 ports for FC and 4 ports for iSCSI (keeping in mind that our storage has both FC and iSCSI ports)?
5)       Is there any License required for enable FC, FCoE and iSCSI protocols?
An early resolution of these queries will enable us to make a decision regarding the switch.
Thanks
Bhanudas Mali

The specification for the Nexus 5548UP switch claims that it supports 10 Gigabit Ethernet. Can you please confirm if this relates to iSCSI support that the switch provides?
The "UP" in the Nexus 5548 stands for Universal Port.  This means that each port can support FC, FCoE and Ethernet.  So, a 5548 has 32 ports of SFP/SFP+.  Each port can support and push 10 Gbps at a 1:1 oversubscription rate.
There is an optional 16-port SFP/SFP+ module, N55-M16UP, which will add an additional 16 Universal Ports.
Because they are "universal" they can support 1/10 Gbps FCoE and Ethernet as well as 1, 2, 4 and 8 Gbps FC.

Similar Messages

  • Cisco Nexus 5548UP to Brocade SAN Connectivity

    Hi,
    I have a Server-SAN-Storage setup as shown in the attachment/below. There are new Cisco UCS rack mount servers with VIC 1225 and Virtual servers on VMware Esxi hypevisor connected to a new Cisco Nexus 5548UP switch in IP+FCoE mode. The new 5548 switch then connects to an existing production SAN of Brocade 48000 Director SAN switch which connects to storage in production environment.
    I need to know the best way to connect the 5548 switch to the Brocade SAN switch without disrupting the existing Production SAN environment i.e. Brocade SAN switch configurations & setup e.g. Fabric Principal switch. priority etc.
    Would configuring the 5548 switch in NPV mode be best practice?

    See Figure 6-2 Converged Multi-hop FCoE Network Design Using FCoE NPV
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5000/sw/operations/fcoe/513_n1_1/ops_fcoe/ops_fcoe_npv.html
    You have to use NPV on N5k, there is no FC interop support on N5k, to connect to Brocade.

  • Cisco Nexus 5548UP support SFP-10G-LRM ?

    Hi all, I have a question about Cisco Nexus 5548UP. Is Cisco Nexus 5548UP support SFP-10G-LRM ? Because in CCW, i can't configure the SFP-10G-LRM. There is only SFP-10G-LR, SR, and the others, but there's no LRM. Pelase help me to answer this question. Thanks a lot

    The LRM is s special case transceiver which supports 10 Gbps over older FDDI grade multimode fiber when used with a mode conditioning patch cord. It is not supported on the Nexus 5548UP.
    The SFP-10G-LR is used with single mode fiber for spans up to 10 km in length. It is supported on the 5548UP (and most every platform of Cisco's that takes SFPs).
    Please see the product data sheet here.

  • Cisco Nexus 5548UP Switch Current Version 5.2(1)N1(4)

    Hi, we're currently have Cisco Nexus 5548UP Switch Current Version 5.2(1)N1(4)
    It's not listed as affected version:
    Known Affected Releases:
    (5)
    5.2(1)N1(8a)
    6.0(2)N2(5)
    7.0(3)N1(0.125)
    7.0(4)N1(1)
    7.1(0)N1(0.349)
    The Known Fixed Releases as follow:
    Known Fixed Releases:
    (7)
    6.0(2)N2(4.3)
    6.0(2)N2(5a)
    7.0(1)ZN(0.615)
    7.0(5)N1(0.173)
    7.0(5)N1(1)
    7.1(0)N1(0.371)
    7.1(0)N1(1)
    Do we need to update to the latest releases?
    If yes, which version of the known fixed release is best suit our current version
    Cisco Nexus 5548UP Switch Current Version 5.2(1)N1(4)
    Thanks.

    I had the same question, so I opened a TAC case to find the right software version. I was told that the software listed as available on the bug report were custom NX-OS builds and that there are no patched versions available  for the 5548p. The support engineer also said that the Nexus 5k upgrades were not expected until November or December. The best advice I could get was to subscribe to the bug report and wait to be notified of an available upgrade.

  • Cisco Nexus 5548UP and FI6248UP compatibility with FC SFP

    Cisco Nexus 5548UP and FI 6248UP comes with Unified Ports. What are the SFP types this port can take? 1Gig, 10Gig and 2/4/8FC. Could you please clarify?  
    Thanks,
    Cheriyan

    Hi Cheriyan,
    Here is te URL to the 6200 series FI data sheet:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/ps10265/ps11544/data_sheet_c78-675245.pdf
    Check for the table to supported SFPs.
    Same for the 5500 switches
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps9441/ps9670/data_sheet_c78-618603.html.
    Hope this helps!
    ./Abhinav

  • Interoperability between Cisco Nexus 5548UP and IBM FC3171

    Dear Techies,
    We have a Cisco Nexus Switch 5548UP already in our environment with DS-SFP-FC8G-SW installed. We are planning to procure IBM Pure Flex Chassis without FC Switch, since we already have Nexus that can provide this facility. But in order to connect IBM Flex with Cisco Nexus we are planning to use IBM FC3171 Switch with IBM 44X1964 Transceivers which will act as a Mediator/Pass Through Switch for connecting IBM and Cisco.
    If any expert knows OR have used this scenario, please let me know since I am interested to know if it will work in this scenario or not.
    Regards,
    Farhan.

    Dear prkrishn
    I am working on the Data Center Solution between two Data Center, details underneath
    DC 1 Site
    1. 2 x DC Core Switch (Nexus 7009) - will be used for Servers, Application, IBM V7000, Database, etc.
    2. 2 x Network Core Switch (Cisco 6509) - Handle Campus and Inter Building connection.
    3. IBM V7000 (SAN)
    DC 2 Site
    1. 2 x DC Core Switch (Nexus 7009) - will be used for Servers, Application, IBM V7000, Database, etc.
    2. 2 x Network Core Switch (Cisco 6509) - Handle Campus and Inter Building connection.
    3. IBM V7000 (SAN)
    With the above mention setup, can I configure FCIP between DC1 & DC2 using Nexus 7009? or I need FCIP capable Switch such as IBM SAN Switch (SAN06-BR), I was wondering if I can configure FCIP on Nexus 7009 DC Switch.
    Hoping for your kind response at earliest.
    Kind Regards,
    Arnold

  • Cisco Nexus 5548UP upgrade path

    Hi,
       I'm planning to upgrade Nexus 5548UP (no L3 services) from 5.2(1)N1(6)  to 7.0(5)N1(1). Is this upgrade path vaild? or is there any intermediate version; also advise if ISSU is possible.
    Regards,
    Navin RK

    Hi,
    Yes you can upgrade directly from 5.2(1)N1(6) to 7.0(5)N1(1).  ISSU is possible, provided you meet the requirements.  You can copy the kickstart and system image to bootflash, then run the "show install all impact" command to see whether or not ISSU will be possible with your configuration.
    Here is a document supporting the statements above: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5500/sw/upgrade/705_N1_1/n5500_upgrade_downgrade_700.html#pgfId-640981

  • Cisco Nexus 5548UP connecting to HP P4330 StoreVirtual over iScsi

    Hi,
    I need some advice when it comes to how to setup a port-channel between Nexus 5548UP and a HP StoreVirtual 4330 device. The idea is to use 2 10 GB ports in a port-channel group and this far I've this on the port-channel group;
    interface port-channel1002
      priority-flow-control mode off
      switchport access vlan 400
      load-interval counter 2 30
      load-interval counter 3 300
    What about priority-flow-control, any needs to change anything here? Any other things that needs to be considered when using iScsi?
    Much appreciated!
    Tony Lewis

    Hi Tony,
    You do not have to worry about PFC. Priority-Flow-Control is something which is related to FCOE or DCBX protocol. With iSCSI as this is a TCP traffic, you have to make sure that you have a proper QOS for the IP Subnet or VLAN that has your iSCSI hosts transmitting the data. As iSCSI rides over TCP this is the major issue that I have seen related to the valid QOS config for the traffic. There is not best practice for it but you have make sure that you added it to a class other than BE or Scavanger class.
    Hope this helps.
    Cheers,
    -amit singh

  • Cisco Nexus 5548UP - Enhanced vPC

    Hello,
    We will be deploying a new Cisco Nexus 5K environment with 2248 FEX's.
    The firewall in the environment (non-Cisco), only supports static Port-channels - i.e "ON" configuration and not LACP.
    For redundancy we will be patching it into the environment in a topology where VLAN's are trunked and connected to two FEX modules as on page 2 of this document:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5000/sw/mkt_ops_guides/513_n1_1/n5k_enhanced_vpc.pdf
    Every example I've seen online uses LACP instead of a static Port-channel. My questions are:
    Will this cause any issues in the event of port failure?
    Is this best practice?
    Are there any "gotchas" or caveats with this design?
    Many thanks in advance.
    Jacob

    I always like to use LACP where and when I can. Some devices, like your firewall and vmware do not support LACP. As long as both devices are configured correctly and using mode-on, there should be no issues with this. I do not like mode-on for this reason, as it does not negotiate anything before bringing up the port-channel. Therefore just confirm it is configured as mode-on on both sides and you should be fine. This should not cause any disruption if one link fails, but I would test the configuration before putting this into production.

  • Cisco Nexus 5548UP connect to dual NetApp controllers using FCOE

    Here is my setup, I have two 5548UP's connected via VPC peer link. I am tring to use VPC to connect to a NetApp with dual 10gb ports using FCOE, with each 5548 getting one of the connections.
    I then want to use VPC to connect to a dell server that has dual 10gb ports using FCOE as well with each 5548 getting a connection. I am new to FCOE, any help would be appreciated. I am getting confused in the configuration for both. Thanks

    Erik,
    Can you check the deployment guides from links pasted below -
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/ns340/ns414/ns742/ns743/ns1050/landing_flexpod.html
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/SBA/February2013/Cisco_SBA_DC_NetAppStorageDeploymentGuide-Feb2013.pdf
    Head to the Nexus 5k section and check how FCoE is configured, how vPC is configured..
    Once you tackle 5k, depending on your Environment (from Netapp perspective), check how to create Interface groups.

  • Macvtap over Cisco Nexus ...

    Hi everybody!
    First all my apologizes for my english language!
    I have a standard server running linux (centos 6.5) with kvm to install and configure virtual machines. I tried to use macvtap driver to setup the virutal network interfaces. I not use ucs Cisco servers or Nexus 1000v switches!
    The physical ethernet is connected to Cisco Nexus 2000 (with a Cisco Nexus  5548up). To default a standard switch not working with the macvtap configuration because the swith to be support "reflective relay" or "hair pinning" propierties for to this works.
    Is possible configure the Cisco Nexus 5548up/2000 to this works? Capabilities how to Adapter-FEX, veheternet, VM-FEX o similars can help me?
    Know you some docs over this?
    Thank you all.

    Hi Tony,
    You do not have to worry about PFC. Priority-Flow-Control is something which is related to FCOE or DCBX protocol. With iSCSI as this is a TCP traffic, you have to make sure that you have a proper QOS for the IP Subnet or VLAN that has your iSCSI hosts transmitting the data. As iSCSI rides over TCP this is the major issue that I have seen related to the valid QOS config for the traffic. There is not best practice for it but you have make sure that you added it to a class other than BE or Scavanger class.
    Hope this helps.
    Cheers,
    -amit singh

  • Nexus 5548UP with Checkpoint firewall

    I know this is a little out of scope, but was hoping someone would have some insight.
    I have two Checkpoint firewalls connected to Cisco Nexus 5548UPs 10G. I am noticing a lot of dropped RC on the Checkpoint interfaces. I'm wondering if the firewalls cannot support the fast cut-through speed of the Cisco switches. Is there anything I can do on the Cisco side to help the Checkpoints handle the traffic? Flow control maybe? Thanks.

    Hi Adnan,
    Kindly check the PPT attached  for more detailed design tips for same.
    Best Regards
    Sachin Garg

  • 3750 and Nexus 5548UP Support

    I am working on a project that was handed down and several different engineers got their hands on.  The project is (or should have been) a simple data storage/center.  Fixing all the design problems has left me with very little time to research the security folks issues and I need help.
    We are using Cisco Nexus 5548UP for our data center core and distribution/routing to encryptors connecting our remote sites which use Cisco 3750X series switches.  The Nexus is running NOS 5.2(1)N1(4) and the 3750s use 12.2(55) IP base.
    These are our particular issues:
    1)  For management and monitoring, what would be a good product to use to support this?  If Cisco Prime Infrastructure, what ports would need to be allowed/opened through firewalls/ACLs (SNMP, syslog, etc)?
    2)  For switch login, the network security folks are reluctant to use TACACS and want to push for LDAP instead.  Using Active Directory, is there any way to get the Cisco Nexus 5548UP and Cisco 3750Xs talking to Active Directory?  I've found both 'yes' and 'no' answers online and am not sure.  Do I need to use a different NOS and/or IOS?  Are there specific directions somewhere?  Or is it not possible?
    3)  Without TACACS, is there any way to implement command logging to a syslog server on the Nexus?  On the 3750s, I make the following changes and all commands are relayed to our syslog server:
    Enable
    Configure terminal
    Archive
    Log config
    Logging enable
    Logging size 500
    Hidekeys
    Notify syslog
    End
    Is there anything similar for the Nexus?
    4)  In conjunction with #3, we need to be able to log each login attempt (success and failure) to a syslog server on the Nexus.  On the 3750, using the "login on-[failure/success] log", it is can setup easy enough.  On the Nexus, I haven't been able to find anything similar.  I can't find any instructions on setting this up on the Nexus, though.
    5)  What IOS/NOS do we need to use to be able to lock out users after 3 failed logins (again, without using TACACS)?
    If you need more information, please ask.
    V/R,
    Chris

    The LRM is s special case transceiver which supports 10 Gbps over older FDDI grade multimode fiber when used with a mode conditioning patch cord. It is not supported on the Nexus 5548UP.
    The SFP-10G-LR is used with single mode fiber for spans up to 10 km in length. It is supported on the 5548UP (and most every platform of Cisco's that takes SFPs).
    Please see the product data sheet here.

  • Ask the Expert: Cisco Nexus 2000, 5000, and 6000 Series Switches

    with Cisco Expert Vinayak Sudame
    Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to learn and ask questions how to configure and troubleshoot the Cisco Nexus 2000, 5000 and 6000 Series Switches with Cisco subject matter expert Vinayak Sudame. You can ask any question on configuration, troubleshooting, features, design and Fiber Channel over Ethernet (FCoE).
    Vinayak Sudame is a Technical Lead in Data Center Switching Support Team within Cisco's Technical Services in RTP, North Carolina. His current responsibilities include but are not limited to Troubleshooting Technical support problems and Escalations in the areas of Nexus 5000, Nexus 2000, FCoE. Vinayak is also involved in developing technical content for Cisco Internal as well as external. eg, Nexus 5000 Troubleshooting Guide (CCO), Nexus 5000 portal (partners), etc. This involves cross team collaboration and working with multiple different teams within Cisco. Vinayak has also contributed to training account teams and partners in CAE (Customer Assurance Engineering) bootcamp dealing with Nexus 5000 technologies. In the past, Vinayak's responsibilities included supporting MDS platform (Fiber Channel Technologies) and work with EMC support on Escalated MDS cases. Vinayak was the Subject Matter Expert for Santap Technologies before moving to Nexus 5000 support. Vinayak holds a Masters in Electrical Engineering with Specialization in Networking from Wichita State University, Kansas. He also holds Cisco Certification CCIE (#20672) in Routing and Switching.
    Remember to use the rating system to let Vinayak know if you have received an adequate response.
    Vinayak might not be able to answer each question due to the volume expected during this event. Remember that you can continue the conversation on the  Data Center sub-community, Other Data Center Topics discussion forum shortly after the event.
    This event last through Friday July 12, 2013. Visit the community often to view responses to youe questions of other community members.

    Hi Vinayak,
    Output of "show cfs internal ethernet-peer database"
    Switch 1
    ETH Fabric
    Switch WWN              logical-if_index
    20:00:54:7f:ee:b7:c2:80 [Local]
    20:00:54:7f:ee:b6:3f:80 16000005
    Total number of entries = 2
    Switch 2
    ETH Fabric
    Switch WWN              logical-if_index
    20:00:54:7f:ee:b6:3f:80 [Local]
    20:00:54:7f:ee:b7:c2:80 16000005
    Total number of entries = 2
    Output of "show system internal csm info trace"
    Switch 1 in which "show cfs peers" show proper output
    Mon Jul  1 05:46:19.145339  (CSM_T) csm_sp_buf_cmd_tbl_expand_range(8604): No range command in buf_cmd_tbl.
    Mon Jul  1 05:46:19.145280  (CSM_T) csm_set_sync_status(6257): Peer RT status PSSed
    Mon Jul  1 05:46:19.145188  (CSM_T) csm_sp_handle_local_verify_commit(4291):
    Mon Jul  1 05:46:19.145131  csm_continue_verify_ac[597]: peer is not reachable over CFS so continuing with local verify/commit
    Mon Jul  1 05:46:19.145071  csm_tl_lock(766): Peer information not found for IP address: '172.16.1.54'
    Mon Jul  1 05:46:19.145011  csm_tl_lock(737):
    Mon Jul  1 05:46:19.144955  (CSM_EV) csm_sp_build_tl_lock_req_n_send(941): sending lock-request for CONF_SYNC_TL_SESSION_TYPE_VERIFY subtype 0 to Peer ip = (172.16.1.54)
    Mon Jul  1 05:46:19.143819  (CSM_T) csm_copy_image_and_internal_versions(788): sw_img_ver: 5.2(1)N1(2a), int_rev: 1
    Mon Jul  1 05:46:19.143761  (CSM_T) csm_sp_get_peer_sync_rev(329): found the peer with address=172.16.1.54 and sync_rev=78
    Mon Jul  1 05:46:19.143699  (CSM_T) csm_sp_get_peer_sync_rev(315):
    Mon Jul  1 05:46:19.143641  (CSM_EV) csm_sp_build_tl_lock_req_n_send(838): Entered fn
    Mon Jul  1 05:46:19.143582  (CSM_T) csm_set_sync_status(6257): Peer RT status PSSed
    Switch 2 in which "show cfs peers" does not show proper output
    Mon Jul  1 06:13:11.885354  (CSM_ERR) csm_pss_cmd_tree_walk_cb(2057): Parent command not found for cmd switchport mode trunk, cmd pseq 77 seq 482
    Mon Jul  1 06:13:11.884992  (CSM_ERR) csm_pss_cmd_tree_walk_cb(2057): Parent command not found for cmd channel-group 51 mode active, cmd pseq 357 seq 369
    Mon Jul  1 06:13:11.884932  (CSM_ERR) csm_pss_cmd_tree_walk_cb(2057): Parent command not found for cmd switchport trunk allowed vlan 2, 11, cmd pseq 357 seq 368
    Mon Jul  1 06:13:11.884872  (CSM_ERR) csm_pss_cmd_tree_walk_cb(2057): Parent command not found for cmd switchport mode trunk, cmd pseq 357 seq 367
    Mon Jul  1 06:13:11.884811  (CSM_ERR) csm_pss_cmd_tree_walk_cb(2057): Parent command not found for cmd description process_vpc, cmd pseq 357 seq 366
    Mon Jul  1 06:13:11.884750  (CSM_ERR) csm_pss_cmd_tree_walk_cb(2057): Parent command not found for cmd channel-group 51 mode active, cmd pseq 352 seq 365
    Mon Jul  1 06:13:11.884690  (CSM_ERR) csm_pss_cmd_tree_walk_cb(2057): Parent command not found for cmd switchport trunk allowed vlan 2, 11, cmd pseq 352 seq 364
    Mon Jul  1 06:13:11.884630  (CSM_ERR) csm_pss_cmd_tree_walk_cb(2057): Parent command not found for cmd switchport mode trunk, cmd pseq 352 seq 363
    Mon Jul  1 06:13:11.884568  (CSM_ERR) csm_pss_cmd_tree_walk_cb(2057): Parent command not found for cmd description process_vpc, cmd pseq 352 seq 362
    Mon Jul  1 06:13:11.884207  (CSM_EV) csm_sp_acfg_gen_handler(3011):  Preparing config into /tmp/csm_sp_acfg_1733916569.txt
    Mon Jul  1 06:13:11.878695  csm_get_locked_ssn_ctxt[539]: Lock not yet taken.
    Mon Jul  1 06:13:11.878638  (CSM_EV) csm_sp_acfg_gen_handler(2937): Recieved sp acfg merge request for type: running cfg
    Mon Jul  1 06:12:29.527840  (CSM_T) csm_pss_del_seq_tbl(1989): Freeing seq tbl data
    Mon Jul  1 06:12:29.513255  (CSM_T) csm_sp_acfg_gen_handler(3106): Done acfg file write
    Mon Jul  1 06:12:29.513179  (CSM_EV) csm_sp_acfg_gen_handler(3011):  Preparing config into /tmp/csm_sp_acfg_1733911262.txt
    Mon Jul  1 06:12:29.508859  csm_get_locked_ssn_ctxt[539]: Lock not yet taken.
    Mon Jul  1 06:12:29.508803  (CSM_EV) csm_sp_acfg_gen_handler(2937): Recieved sp acfg merge request for type: running cfg
    Mon Jul  1 05:53:17.651236  Collecting peer info
    Mon Jul  1 05:53:17.651181  Failed to get the argumentvalue for 'ip-address'
    Mon Jul  1 05:40:59.262736  DB Unlocked Successfully
    Mon Jul  1 05:40:59.262654  Unlocking DB, Lock Owner Details:Client:1 ID:1
    Mon Jul  1 05:40:59.262570  (CSM_T) csm_sp_del_buf_cmd(1713): Deleting comand with Id = 1
    Mon Jul  1 05:40:59.262513  DB Lock Successful by Client:1 ID:1
    Mon Jul  1 05:40:59.262435  Recieved lock request by Client:1 ID:1
    Mon Jul  1 05:40:41.741224  ssnmgr_ssn_handle_create_get: Session FSM already present, ID:1
    Mon Jul  1 05:40:41.741167  ssnmgr_handle_mgmt_request: Create/Get request received for session[process_n5kprof]
    show cfs lock gives no output.
    Just to further clarify, we have 4 5548UP switches in the same management vlan. 2 switches are in one location lets say location A and they are CFS peers and are working fine.
    These two switches which are having problem are in location B. All the switches are in the same vlan. Essentially the all CFS multicast messages will be seen by all 5548 switches as they are in the same vlan. I am assuming that this might not create any problems as we specify the peers in the respective configurations. Or do we have to change the CFSoIPv4 multicast addresses in location B or may be configure a different region.
    Regards.

  • Is Cisco Nexus 5596UP support vlan base Policing and traffic shaping on code NX OS version: 5.1(3)N1(1)

    Is Cisco Nexus 5596UP support vlan base Policing and traffic shaping on code NX OS version: 5.1(3)N1(1)
    where i couldn't see any police command under the policy map 

    I have tested this issue on another 5548UP with L3 running the same NX-OS version and get the same problem. Show CDP from the switch is not discovering devices, but the neightbors can see the 5K in question. Reboot sometimes will fix it, but not always. I suspect a problem with the software since that doesn't happen in NX-OS 5.2. The one I am using is
    Software
      BIOS:      version 3.6.0
      loader:    version N/A
      kickstart: version 5.1(3)N2(1)
      system:    version 5.1(3)N2(1)

Maybe you are looking for