CL24N assign classes to objects

Hi,
while I am trying to assign charateristic values for ex:plant if I want to assign more than one value system is not choosing i.e while selecting the plants in value side ex 1000,2000,3000 i could either select 1000,2000,3000 only I am not able to select 1000and 2000 .
After selecting 1000 if I want to select 2000 also I should select that also but if I select 2000 after selecting 1000 ,the first selection gets deselected,what may be the reason.
we are using OS windows 7
Regards
Vijikantha

Hi
Set the Multiple Value indicator for your characteristic.
regards
Anand

Similar Messages

Assigning object of one class to object of another class.

Hi,
How will i assign an object of one class to an object of another class?
Ex:
ClassX A=some_method();
Now how will I assign the object A of class ClassX to the object 'B' of another class 'ClassY'.

In java you can only assign a object reference of one class into object reference of another class if the first class is the Second class (in other words the first class is a subclass of second class).
for example if this is a inheritance chart
Car ==========>Mercedes
"===========>Audi
then you can use
Audi a1 = new Audi();
Car c1 = a1;
or Mercedes m1 = new Mercedes();
Car c1 = m1;
but not
a1 = m1;
before assigning a variable into another variable of different class, use:
if(variable1 instanceOf ToBeAssignedIn Class){
variable2 = variable1;
example:
Audi a1;
Car c1;
if(a1 instanceOf Car){
c1 = a1;
Edited by: gaurav.suse on Apr 10, 2012 1:14 PM
Edited by: gaurav.suse on Apr 10, 2012 1:15 PM

WCM: Operational Class assignment to Technical Objects

Greetings Experts, Gurus and SAP Sages!
In WCM, we are able to create an Operational Class to restrict the particular Operational Conditions & Operational Groups that are relevant for the Technical Objects.
But I am having difficulty uderstanding the practicality of this assignment:
Is the assignment only made directly, by assiging an existing Technical Object (FL or EQ) to the Operational Class via transaction WCC8 ? If so, then how can we handle new master data? If a new FL or EQ is created, do we always need to run WCC8 again?
As far as I know, an Operational Class is different from a Class in the sense of the Classification functionality, so we can't assign the Operational Conditions & Operational Groups to any existing Class of type 002 or 003, nor can we assign the Operational Class when creating a Technical Object in IL01 or IE01.
So what is the purpose? Is there any automatic or indirect assignment possible? Or perhaps an enhancement is needed, to automatically assign a new FL or EQ to the OC based on some attributes?

Thanks, Srinivas!
The root of this requirement is actually the rather sketchy quality of the TO master data. Therefore, it's not possible to assign all the necessary Technical Objects to the Operational Class now, as more Technical Objects will be created as the solution matures. And going into WCC8 each time when the FL or EQ is created will be very cumbersome and prone to error.
I'm actually thinking of utilizing User Exits to assign the Technical Object to Operational Class via a custom logic (based on Class or Object Type, as you rightly suggest).
IEQM0003 Additional checks before equipment update
ILOM0001 Additional checks before saving a functional location
It's a bit disappointing there is not a standard way to do this...

MIGO Error - Account 6500029 requires assignment with CO object

Hi Experts,
I am facing problem with new material code opened recently. Valuation class assigned is ZSTD.
At the time of GRN, It is giving an error msg :
Message no. KI235. Account 6500029 requires assignment with CO object.
Kindly note I am not making an account assignment P.O. It is a normal P.O.
Previously also with same valuation class, we have received no. of materials with out any error.
It should post the material to my inventory account 1220000 as it did with materials of the same valuation class earlier. I don't know from where it is picking GL 6500029.
Kindly help.
Regards,
Rajneesh Gulati

Hi ,
In OBYC kindly check the Key BSX for the GL account assingment to the valuation class .
As inventory accounts are Balance sheet accounts and do no require an assingnment to a cost element .
If your account is getting changed then check the same in OBYC - BRX .
Regards ,
Dewang T

Question about handing classes in Objective-C

Greetings -- I'm pretty new to Objective-C. I do have a few apps out in the app store, but they were simple one-form apps where I was able to dump everything into the main class and be happy with it.
This new project I'm working on, is huge in comparison. Over 25 views, accessible through TableView driven menus.
I was able to get all of the menus working, each launching a separate view NIB file (so far, just a label to show me that it's done, but I got that part working.)
Now what I'm trying to do, is add a "click" sound when a row is selected. But I'm wanting to do this in a separate class, so each .m file can instantiate it's own version of the logic instead of having the same code 29 times.
So, this is what I've done:
Click.h
#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>
#import <AudioToolbox/AudioToolbox.h>
@interface Click : NSObject
SystemSoundID soundID;
-(void) playClick;
@end
Click.m
#import "Click.h"
@implementation Click
-(id) init
self = [super init];
NSString *path = [[NSBundle mainBundle] pathForResource:@"click" ofType:@"wav"];
AudioServicesCreateSystemSoundID((CFURLRef)[NSURL fileURLWithPath:path], &soundID);
return self;
-(void) playClick
AudioServicesPlaySystemSound (soundID);
@end
RootViewController.h
#import <UIKit/UIKit.h>
#import "Click.h"
@interface RootViewController : UITableViewController <UITableViewDelegate, UITableViewDataSource>
NSArray *controllers;
Click *clicker;
@property (nonatomic, retain) NSArray *controllers;
@property (nonatomic, retain) Click *clicker;
@end
RootViewController.m
#import "RootViewController.h"
@implementation RootViewController
@synthesize controllers, clicker;
- (void)viewDidLoad
Click *newClicker = [[Click alloc] init];
clicker = newClicker;
[newClicker release];
self.title = @"Main Menu";
- (void)dealloc {
[controllers release];
[clicker release];
[super dealloc];
#pragma mark Table View Delegate Methods
-(void)tableView:(UITableView *)tableView didSelectRowAtIndexPath:(NSIndexPath *)indexPath
[clicker playClick];
I cut out the code pieces regarding the TableView that I know works, and tried showing only the parts that I've added to make the sound.
What I've tried, is when the RootViewController is created, it has a SystemSoundID type variable defined with it named clicker. Then as part of "viewDidLoad", instantiate an instance of the class and have it automatically populate the variable "soundID". Then during "didSelectRowAtIndexPath", I want the "playClick" method of "clicker" to be run, but at this point the app seems to get caught in some sort of perma-loop, and I have to "STOP"/"Home" out of it.
I'm hoping the problem is my rookie-status at using Objective-C objects, and the solution jumps out at you veterans, and then whatever problem I am having won't be duplicated when I create additional classes that I'd want to merge into my ViewController logic.
Hope I've made everything clear. If anyone has questions, I'll be checking for replies
Thanks.

Dragon's Nest wrote:
Is it preferred to init a copy and assign it like you did above?
Yes, it's an accepted pattern which you'll see in most of the sample apps. Asnor's code works just as well in this case, and it might always work for you if you stick to that same pattern. However if you were working on a team and everyone else used the more common pattern it might cause a problem. For example, this code would cause a memory leak:
@property (nonatomic, retain) Click *clicker; // interface
self.clicker = [[Click alloc] init]; // implementation
The above is the flip side of your original code. In this case, because we're not releasing the newly alloced object, its retain count is +2 after the setter retains it.
There are other advantages to the accepted pattern. Suppose you weren't assigning the new object to an ivar but only using the object in that one block of code. Should you then release it? Yes. Will you remember? Well, if you're using the pattern, you'll always release it. If you always release the local pointer regardless of whether it gets retained elsewhere, you're much less likely to have a memory leak. How bout the case where you return the pointer (i.e. alloc an object and return it's address from that method)? In that case you just autorelease it. So whoever called the method needs to retain the returned object if it needs to be used after the current event cycle.
Either way, immediate release or autorelease, you're always releasing an alloced object in the same block of code.
Memory management can easily get out of control without following consistent patterns. Alloc->retainBySetter->release is the accepted pattern for Cocoa. Your original code meant to use the correct pattern, but you just forgot that clicker=object isn't the same as self.clicker=object because the latter retains the object. Once you've consistently used the correct pattern for awhile, you'll almost never make that mistake.
Also, is there any difference in calling it in the following two ways:
@property (nonatomic, retain) Click *clicker; // <-- must be considered to answer this question
@synthesize clicker;
[clicker playClick];
[self.clicker playClick];
In the above case there's no difference since the getter synthesized for that property declaration will simply return the value of the ivar (i.e. the address of the retained Clicker object). But in the general case, there certainly could be a difference. If the property was atomic, for example, the results could be different. Of course there will definitely be a difference if you wrote a custom getter that did something more than the default.
Is there a rule or convention re when to use the getter and when to use the ivar directly? Not that I know of. I think you just need to be aware of what the getter does when deciding whether to use the dot notation. This is a point you might want to research a little more, though. Maybe someone here with more experience in Obj-C or Cocoa will comment.
In fact a few of the experts in this forum advise against ever using dot notation. They feel it was invented to crash newbie programs. If you never use dot notation the difference between these two lines is much easier to see:
clicker = newClicker;
[self setClicker:newClicker];
But once again, if you stick to the same pattern all the time, it's much harder to make a mistake.
- Ray

How can we assign sproxy generated objects to a different package?

Hello Expert,
We need to change the package assigment of sproxy generated DDIC objects. How can we assign sproxy generated objects to a different package?
Regards,
Thulasi

Any idea?

Account Assignment to CO object

Dear,
        While doing goods receipt for Purchage oredr, it is showing error Account 800066 requires an assignment to CO object.
        Kindly help me out.
        I sincerely thanks in advance to responder.
Regards
AJIT K SINGH
Edited by: AJIT K SINGH on Oct 30, 2009 9:37 AM

Dear AJIT K SINGH,
These are the following points could be the reasons for the Error;
1. While cration of the Purchase Requisition u entered the Account Assignment Category, then only it will ask Cost Object while in GRN.
2. In OKB9 my be automic assignment assiment must be there.
In the previous mail as per as Mr. Prawan kumar, i hope in grn both accounts should be the Balance Sheet G/L account, then there is no chance, it would become as a Cost element. Pawan kumar plese check once.
Regards

Assignment of Cost object

Hi Gurus,
I am using one controlling area for 4 for a group of companies with 4 company codes. When i am assigning some co object to a particular GL account that is creating the problem for other company codes. For Example:
Controlling Area 1234.
Gl account : 9000 4444( expenses) for 4 company codes "same"
Already created 4 cost centres for each company code with the same number, only initial has changed. Like for company 1 it is 1000 1234, for 2nd company 2000 1234 so on.
Now when they are processing they are facing problem for a different company code.
Pls provide me the solution.
Satya.

Hi Satya
In the cost element master, you can specify only one cost center as both company codes are assigned to same controlling area.
In this case you need to specify default cost center using t code OKB9, wherein you will be able to specify default cost center per company code.
Award points, if useful.
Regards
Rakesh Pawaskar

Check on Cost elements assigned to cost objects

Hi,
In my program, I need to check whether cost elements assigned to cost objects or not.
Is there any function module available to check whether cost elements assigned to cost objects?
Please provide the code for check on cost elements assigned to cost objects.
Regards,
Tintu

Check table with CSK*

MR11 clearing - GL accounts requires an assignment to co object

Hi Experts,
While executing MR11 clearing, system is throwing error account xxxxxxxx requiring an assignment to CO object. We have done GR as well IR for which cost object is correctly picked as in purchase order. But while doing MR11 it is throwing error. What configuration needs to be checked to over come this error.
Thanks in advance
Narayanan

Hi,
Go to FS00 choose your That g/l account click on change mode and click on Edit cost element (F8) and click on Default Acct Assgnmt Tab give me a cost center and save
Thanks,
Raviteja

Cost assignment-Multiple cost objects being selected by default from the EP

Hi,
I have created an expense report from the Portal and entered the cost object - a WBS element and saved the report. Now, when I check in table: PTRV_SCOS, it shows me the cost object assigned are - both - the WBS Element as well as the Cost center. This is incorrect as there should be only one cost object - either the cost center or the WBS element. However, when I book the expenses from the backend, it works fine. Only the WBS or cost center is displayed in the table mentioned above. Anyone has any idea as to why this is happening?
Many thanks in advance for your efforts.
Cheers guys.
Hope to hear from you soon
Best regards,
Tanmay Dhingra
Edited by: Tanmay Dhingra on May 17, 2011 10:05 AM

Hi All,
First of all, thanks for your responses..
Right, about the issue, what I explained here was that I am indeed assigning only one cost object: the WBS element. The issue was that even though I am assigning only the WBS element, it was also assigning the cost to the cost center by default. I did some R&D and found the solution to the issue (I was also asked to look for OSS notes but was not satisfied that this issue needs an OSS note to be applied so tried my solution). The issue was in table: T788M (allocate costs to variable account assignment). Here, I created an entry and called it USERGROUP_2 (just a random name) and assigned the variable cost objects (only the WBS and the Cost center) to be displayed. In the next step, I assigned this usergroup to the country in quesion feature (TRVCO). By doing this, I tell the system that only these cost objects are to be considered when an employee wants to assign the cost object. If the system sees that there is no value from the drop down to choose from, it picks up the default cost object (cost center). This was a simple issue that I had to rattle my brains on... but the solution I mention above worked like a hot knife going through butter...
If you guys face this issue, please try this else feel free to get in touch with me on my number below.
Once again, thanks for your responses.
Best regards,
Tanmay Dhingra
+91 880 6666 606

Gl account require assignment to Co object

Hi
while doing PGI .it is giving error of "account require assignment to CO object"
please clear where to assign Co object & how.
do i need to assign the Gl in okb9 seeting

hi,
First identify GL account which you have assigned in OBYC . then go to FS00 and enter your account no. and press on Edit Cost Element in that there is 3rd tab page Default account assignment there give cost center and save it.
Now try once again.
thx.
Ganu

Class and Object name change in the universe designer

Hello Experts
I have a confusion , I am just wondering if I devlop a bobj universe, lets say, based on SQL database and change the name of the class and object during the creation of the universe, will that fetch the data from d/base properly while running a query / report. Although universe class and object has different names than database now but the records are the same. Do we need to point the object to d/base object in some kind of different or special way .
To make my question more simple, In d/base table name is "Employee" whereas on universe side I create a class name "Staff" and at the same time field name in the database is "Emploee ID" whereas in the universe I named it "Badge number".
Please advise if that will make any difference while I run the query or Is there any kind of complication on the universe side that I should expect which I am not familiar with.
I would apprecite your response.
Best Regards

Hello experts,
Let me rephrase the issue with exact scenario.
I have a table names "REGION" with fields region id, region and country id.
I have another table name REGION_SLINE with fields SL_id, region id and Sales_revenue.
I created an equi join between these two tables based on region id field and checked the cardinality which is ok.
Now when I try to create a report based on sales revenue per customer ( "customer's first name" is an other field on CUSTOMER table), I dont get any result in the report and get a message that "No data to reterive"
Also please note that when I run a report which is sales revenue per region id, I get the result, seem slike these two tables REGION and REGION_SLINE can generate the report but sales revenue per customer report is not generated because customer first name is a field of another table.
I was just wondering if I need to write some kind of where clause in the object properties of region id which is used to create equi joon link.
I woulld appreciate your response.
Regards
Edited by: SAP_LCCHS on Jul 4, 2011 9:19 AM
Edited by: SAP_LCCHS on Jul 4, 2011 9:21 AM

Location and account assignment for technical objeCT

WHAT IS Location and account assignment for technical objeCT , FOR functional location

Hi
check the one of the Views for the above data (notification no + fun Location)
VIQMAML_IFLOS
VIQMELST_IFLOS
VIQMEL_IFLOS
VIQMFEL_IFLOS
VIQMSML_IFLOS
Regards
Anji

GL account requires assignment to CO object

Dear All,
While preparing excise Invoice the accounting document is not getting released. On going to T-code VFX3 and tyring to releasing the document message comes as "Account 00000 requires assignment to CO object".
Kindly guide on this issue .
Thanks in advance.

Hi
I think it comes form the Account assignment tab in Item / header level of sales order where we mantain the Business Area.
just check the settings (Path -
ENTERPRISES STRUCTURE>ASSIGNMENT>SALES AND DISTRIBUTION>BUSINESS AREA ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT

CL24N assign classes to objects

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for