Cleansing case creation via I-doc

Hello All ,
Can I manage mass cleansing case creation in CRM 4?
Is there some I-DOC for this purpose?
Thank you ,
Rika

*Confirm the document creation by calling database COMMIT
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
EXPORTING
WAIT = 'X'
IMPORTING
RETURN =
end-of-selection.
*Output the messages returned from BAPI call
LOOP AT RETURN.
WRITE / RETURN-MESSAGE.
ENDLOOP.

Similar Messages

PO creation via BAPI is not into database after run BAPI_PO_CREATION1

Dear friends ,
I have done an case to test PO creation via BAPI_PO_CREATION1.
I run the BAPI and the PO number is presented to me.
But the PO is not in the database.
Should I done another step to write this PO into the database?
best regards,
Ale

*Confirm the document creation by calling database COMMIT
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
EXPORTING
WAIT = 'X'
IMPORTING
RETURN =
end-of-selection.
*Output the messages returned from BAPI call
LOOP AT RETURN.
WRITE / RETURN-MESSAGE.
ENDLOOP.

Cleansing Cases in the Webclient

Hi All,
I have followed all of the steps required to merge accounts in the Webclient and have created cleansing cases.
in the transaction BUPA_CLEAR you can drag and drop Business Transactions from Source to Target but how does this functionality work in the Webclient?
I can see a list of my Business Transactions in the Referenced Data for source and target account, but there is only a checkbox to select or unselect, i have tried both and when the merge is run it does not transfer the Business Transactions between accounts.
How do you specify whether the Business Transaction should be transfered to the source or master account?
Thanks,
Sam

Hi Sam!
I've created a Video describing the Merge Process in Web UI.
[http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/elearn?rid=/library/uuid/1081a104-fd62-2c10-74a9-d36c6ecc3cee&overridelayout=true|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/elearn?rid=/library/uuid/1081a104-fd62-2c10-74a9-d36c6ecc3cee&overridelayout=true]
Within the Merge Process you have a 1by1 comparison and all changes you make via the Checkboxes you have to confirm (Confirm-button). This has to be done for every comparison of a Non-Master Record with the Master Record.
The data will get transferred within the Merge-Process.
Best regards
Arno

Cleansing Cases in Webclient UI

Hi All,
I have followed all of the steps required to merge accounts in the Webclient and have created cleansing cases.
in the transaction BUPA_CLEAR you can drag and drop Business Transactions from Source to Target but how does this functionality work in the Webclient?
I can see a list of my Business Transactions in the Referenced Data for source and target account, but there is only a checkbox to select or unselect, i have tried both and when the merge is run it does not transfer the Business Transactions between accounts.
How do you specify whether the Business Transaction should be transfered to the source or master account?
Thanks,
Sam

Hi Sam!
I've created a Video describing the Merge Process in Web UI.
[http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/elearn?rid=/library/uuid/1081a104-fd62-2c10-74a9-d36c6ecc3cee&overridelayout=true|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/elearn?rid=/library/uuid/1081a104-fd62-2c10-74a9-d36c6ecc3cee&overridelayout=true]
Within the Merge Process you have a 1by1 comparison and all changes you make via the Checkboxes you have to confirm (Confirm-button). This has to be done for every comparison of a Non-Master Record with the Master Record.
The data will get transferred within the Merge-Process.
Best regards
Arno

Cleansing Cases

Hello Experts,
When I use a DQA task (Variant int. duplicate check) to merge bps, I have the following errors at step 'Merge BPs (automatically)' :
Object cannot be changed using this transaction
Enter at least one number for the business partner
The DQA's first two steps (Identify Duplicates Internally and Create Cleansing Cases) are working great.
Do you know what cause the errors ?
Thank you,
Benoî

Hi Sam!
I've created a Video describing the Merge Process in Web UI.
[http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/elearn?rid=/library/uuid/1081a104-fd62-2c10-74a9-d36c6ecc3cee&overridelayout=true|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/elearn?rid=/library/uuid/1081a104-fd62-2c10-74a9-d36c6ecc3cee&overridelayout=true]
Within the Merge Process you have a 1by1 comparison and all changes you make via the Checkboxes you have to confirm (Confirm-button). This has to be done for every comparison of a Non-Master Record with the Master Record.
The data will get transferred within the Merge-Process.
Best regards
Arno

Cleansing cases - CRM 7.0

Hi,
I read that CRM 7.0 has following new features: identify duplicates, create cleansing cases, and merge automatically.
Does anybody know, where I can get more information about this topic?
Thank you in advance!
Best regards
Jasmin Hauser

Hello again!
To be more precise - Identify Duplicates, Create Cleansing Cases, and Merge Automatically are Task-Steps of the Data Quality Administration Task-Type u201CIntegrated Duplicate Checku201D.
Within this Task-Type a whole Target Group can get used and the 3 Task-Steps can run automatically for this Target Group. Itu2019s also possible to schedule this as regularly running Task. In this case not a Target Group but a Profile has to get assigned to the DQA-Task and the first step is the generation of a Target Group out of the Profile.
My recommendation: View this Video: [https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/40bcfd1a-4598-2b10-f590-cb808aa6bc53|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/40bcfd1a-4598-2b10-f590-cb808aa6bc53]
Best regards
Arno

Cleansing cases in WebUI

Hi,
I want create a cleansing case in WebUI. After I defined a master account and started the merge process the non-master account should be flagged for archiving.
But the non-master accounts doesnu2019t have an archiving flag.
I looked blogs, videos, sapnote, u2026 but I didnu2019t find relevant information for this problem. Does anybody know, how I can solve this problem?
We have BBPCRM 6.0.
Thank you in advance!
Best regards
Jasmin Hauser

Hi Sam!
I've created a Video describing the Merge Process in Web UI.
[http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/elearn?rid=/library/uuid/1081a104-fd62-2c10-74a9-d36c6ecc3cee&overridelayout=true|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/elearn?rid=/library/uuid/1081a104-fd62-2c10-74a9-d36c6ecc3cee&overridelayout=true]
Within the Merge Process you have a 1by1 comparison and all changes you make via the Checkboxes you have to confirm (Confirm-button). This has to be done for every comparison of a Non-Master Record with the Master Record.
The data will get transferred within the Merge-Process.
Best regards
Arno

Dispute case Creation using tcode fbl5n

Hi ....
Could u please explain me about dispute case creation using fbl5n tcode.
in my requirement i need to update some custome fields existed in tcode fileds like bank name etc..
while recording m not getting those custom fields are not recoded so could u please suggest
how to rectify this wheather i have to use BAPI with Extention(BAPI Name) r some other.
Thanks in Advance please suggest the solution.
Thanks & Regards,
Skumari.

adding the credit memo is not available as standard.
Object type BUS2094 is the object type for a sales order - so you could use this - but this will bespoke

Automatic dispute case creation

Hi All,
How we can configure, automatic dispute case creation for bank statement upload (short payments).
Regards
Satya

there are no config steps as far as I understand.
As said earlier, go to documentation of t-code FDM_AUTO_CREATE and review the piece for bank statement upload.

Nfs mount point does not allow file creations via java.io.File

Folks,
I have mounted an nfs drive to iFS on a Solaris server:
mount -F nfs nfs://server:port/ifsfolder /unixfolder
I can mkdir and touch files no problem. They appear in iFS as I'd expect. However if I write to the nfs mount via a JVM using java.io.File encounter the following problems:
Only directories are created ? unless I include the user that started the JVM in the oinstall unix group with the oracle user because it's the oracle user that writes to iFS not the user that creating the files!
I'm trying to create several files in a single directory via java.io.File BUT only the first file is created. I've tried putting waits in the code to see if it a timing issue but this doesn't appear to be. Writing via java.io.File to either a native directory of a native nfs mountpoint works OK. ie. Junit test against native file system works but not against an iFS mount point. Curiously the same unit tests running on PC with a windows driving mapping to iFS work OK !! so why not via a unix NFS mapping ?
many thanks in advance.
C

Hi Diep,
have done as requested via Oracle TAR #3308936.995. As it happens the problem is resolved. The resolution has been not to create the file via java.io.File.createNewFile(); before adding content via an outputStream. if the File creation is left until the content is added as shown below the problem is resolved.
Another quick question is link creation via 'ln -fs' and 'ln -f' supported against and nfs mount point to iFS ? (at Operating System level, rather than adding a folder path relationship via the Java API).
many thanks in advance.
public void createFile(String p_absolutePath, InputStream p_inputStream) throws Exception
File file = null;
file = new File(p_absolutePath);
// Oracle TAR Number: 3308936.995
// Uncomment line below to cause failure java.io.IOException: Operation not supported on transport endpoint
// at java.io.UnixFileSystem.createFileExclusively(Native Method)
// at java.io.File.createNewFile(File.java:828)
// at com.unisys.ors.filesystemdata.OracleTARTest.createFile(OracleTARTest.java:43)
// at com.unisys.ors.filesystemdata.OracleTARTest.main(OracleTARTest.java:79)
//file.createNewFile();
FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(file);
byte[] buffer = new byte[1024];
int noOfBytesRead = 0;
while ((noOfBytesRead = p_inputStream.read(buffer, 0, buffer.length)) != -1)
fos.write(buffer, 0, noOfBytesRead);
p_inputStream.close();
fos.flush();
fos.close();
}

Planned order creation via MRP depends, If we change Delivery date in STO

Hi,
Planned order creation via MRP depends, If we change Delivery date in Stock transfer Order.
I created STO with delivery date as 31.1.2012 and when i checked MD04, i can see Planned order created on 27.2.2012 with the same above STO quantity .
Now when i changed the delivery date as 30.1.2012 and runned MD03, and then checkd MD04, planned order disappeared.
Why Planned order got created when STO delivery date was 31.1.2012 and when I changed the delivery date in PO, planned order disappeared.
MRP profile details :
Plnd delivery time 1
GR processing time 1
Planning time fence 38
Tot. repl. lead time 38
Can you please let me know why system is beaving in this manner?
Regards
Utsav

Hi,
Normally , MRP runs based upon the requirements.If your STO is created for a date , system checks through the availabiloty check wheather there exists any stock for that date to get deliverred in the supply plant .If there exists for that date the stock , planned order will not be created.If no stock available then a planned order will be created in MRP.
cHECK the availability check parameters assigned to material master in supply plant.
Regards,

Case creation with "Parties Involved" using WST

Dear All,
We are creating a case in CRM system 7.0 using the webservice created by WST tool. The case number is generated successfully, however, u2018Parties Involvedu2019 is not created in the case.
Error obtained:
TypeID = 300(CRMOST),
SeverityCode = 3,
Note = Object CmgRecord with ID 02 could not be created,
Processing Result Code = 4
As per the help available in :
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm70/helpdata/EN/29/35173e04b64782a831ac600536e906/content.htm
We are populating the values as follows:
PARTNER_FCT = 00000009 (00000009 stands for Activity Partner)
BOR_KEY = 8000000014 (8000000014 is the BP number thats exists in CRM system)
BOR_TYPE = BUS1006 (BUS1006 is the object type)
CRM_MAIN_PARTNER = True (Setting the BP as Main partner)
Please note that the case gets created with "Parties Involved" in WebUI with the above parameters.
Kindly let us know your inputs. Thank you in advance.
Regards,
Pritish

Dear All,
We are creating a case in CRM system 7.0 using the webservice created by WST tool. The case number is generated successfully, however, u2018Parties Involvedu2019 is not created in the case.
Error obtained:
TypeID = 300(CRMOST),
SeverityCode = 3,
Note = Object CmgRecord with ID 02 could not be created,
Processing Result Code = 4
As per the help available in :
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm70/helpdata/EN/29/35173e04b64782a831ac600536e906/content.htm
We are populating the values as follows:
PARTNER_FCT = 00000009 (00000009 stands for Activity Partner)
BOR_KEY = 8000000014 (8000000014 is the BP number thats exists in CRM system)
BOR_TYPE = BUS1006 (BUS1006 is the object type)
CRM_MAIN_PARTNER = True (Setting the BP as Main partner)
Please note that the case gets created with "Parties Involved" in WebUI with the above parameters
We are able to create a case with the "Parties Involved" (using the same above parameters) successfully using the case creation in WebUI manually but with the webservices the error is obtained.
Kindly let us know your inputs. Thank you in advance.
Regards,
Pritish

Problem related to Outbound Delivery creation via Background Job

Hi ,
We are using the program RVV50R10C for creating OBD incase of STO .
Z variant is created to take care of selection parameters which inlcudes Shipping Point , Delivery creation date , Calc Rule, Delivery priority and shipping conditions.
The job is scheduled to run for every 10 minutes .
As planned the job is running for every 10 minutes but the OBD are created after 1 hour .
What are possible causes of this error.?
Please note that there exists enough stock.
Regards
Ramesh Ch

I think you will have the same problem when doing it manually with VL10B.
The creation is based on entries in an index. there is a userexit where you can influence how and when an entry goes into the index. E.g. you can speed up the overall performance if you do not update the index all the time, instead you are doing this with a background job from time to time.
Check if this is the case in your system.
this note may give you some hints:
Note 356061 - Incorrect index compilation caused by own checks

Purchase requisition with Item Category – L creation via Maintenance orders (Plant Maintenance)

Hi Guru’s,
I have a scenario where purchase requisition with Item Category – L (subcontract External) for Repair items (Storeroom Process) need to get generated with Item category-L.This requirement is to MAP in my system.
I am aware that purchase requisition can be created with reference to maintenance orders.
Can anybody through some light on the integration between PM and MM.
If creation of purchase requisition is possible via maintenance orders then please explain me with detailed steps both configurations and master data so that I can able to replicate the same as per business requirement.
I look forward to the expert’s response.
Regards,
Kumar

Hi Kumar.S
You have to installed DIMP 6.0, and activated the business function Refurbishment and Subcontracting (LOG_EAM_ROTSUB) and Serial Numbers in Purchasing (LOG_MM_SERNO) .
Please check the below link:
http://scn.sap.com/thread/1956895
Hope it will help you to resolve your issue.
Regards,
Ritesh

PR to PO via ME59 -Doc type issue

Hi ,
I am executing the functionality of auto PO and did all the master data settings.
When I convert PR of doc type NB to PO via ME59, then it takes PO doc type as NB.
Similarly, when I convert PR of doc type ZNB to PO via ME59, then it takes PO doc type as ZNB
All of the PO doc types are linked to all PR doc types in configuration. Also nothing is maintained in ' Define default values for document types '.
Please let me know if there is any standard setting wherein PR and PO doc types are linked for auto PO.
Regards

Hi,
If an order document type exists which is identical to the purchase
requisition document type and is allowed according to Customizing (table
T161A or Customizing Transaction OMEC) this one has the highest
priority. If there is only one allowed document type, the system
generates this one. For several allowed document types, the one which is
entered as a default document type for Transaction ME21 is prior to the
others (table T160 or Customizing Transaction OMH5). If nothing is
entered here or the default document type is not allowed, the system
takes the first allowed document type.
The modification solution uses table T160. You can add an entry via
table maintenance (Transaction SM31 or SE16) for Transaction ME59 and
define a default document type (unfortunately not via Customizing
Transaction OMH5) since they are restricted to the transactions, where
the default document type is applied in the standard system. To be able
to use the default value in Transaction ME59, implement the program
change in report RM06BB10 as per note 114213.
Regards,
Mauro

Cleansing case creation via I-doc

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for