Clicking Drill Down Plus Sympol its taking more time

Hi ,
In my drill-down report having 2000 records while initially it takes 25 seconds to render the report after that when i click Plus symbol it takes again 20 secs to display the data.My question is in drill-down report for loading data it will hit one
time to fetch data.So why its taking more time while clicking plus symbol the data already exits in datasets.
So please tell me where i am doing mistake.
Regards,
HariKan

Hi HariKan,
According to your description, when you preview the drill down report, after you click plus sign, it takes 20 seconds to expand the detail information.
The total time to generate a reporting server report (RDL) can be divided into 3 elements:
TimeDataRetrieval: The time needed for SQL Server to retrieve the data of all datasets in your report.
TimeProcessing: The number of milliseconds spent in the processing engine for the request.
TimeRendering: The time spent after the Rendering Object Model is exposed to the rendering extension.
After you click plus sign, Report rendering occurs after data and layout are combined into an interim format and then passed to a rendering extension. The time includes:
Time spent in renderer.
Time spent in width and height of report items.
Time spent in paging.
Time spent in all expression evaluation.
For more information about report processing, please refer to the following document:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/robertbruckner/archive/2009/01/05/executionlog2-view.aspx
If you have any more questions, please feel free to ask.
Thanks,
Wendy Fu
Wendy Fu
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

Currency translation taking more time at first time in the report

Hi All,
Here is an issue regarding the currency translation in the report. when we click on the currency translation from the contaxt menu on the report, its taking more time for the first time to get the selection options. But it is fast from the second time onwards. It will be not user friendly if its takes more time for the first time. Is there any way to fast up the processing time for the first time when i go for the "currency translation" option at report level for the first time.
let me know why it takes more time for the first time when we go for this option at report level.
Thanks,
Jack

Once again from the top.
This is undoubtedly not a database issue.
I doubt you can fix it in the database.
You can, however, spend a lot of hours asking questions and poking around if you are a consultant paid by the hour.
But as long as you are looking for something to do here are some that won't fix the problem but may be worth a few minutes of your time.
WHERE 1 = 1Are you kidding? Drop this nonsense. The Oracle optimizer is not brain dead. If it were my database I would also drop the parallel hint like a bad habit.
/*+ parallel(rp1, 8) */Again the Oracle optimizer is not brain dead. Ask for parallel threads that don't exist and the database will just queue your SQL and let it sit there until sufficient resources become available.

CDP Performance Issue-- Taking more time fetch data

Hi,
I'm working on Stellent 7.5.1.
For one of the portlet in portal its taking more time to fetch data. Please can some one help me to solve this issue.. So that performance can be improved.. Please kindly provide me solution.. This is my code for fetching data from the server....
public void getManager(final HashMap binderMap)
throws VistaInvalidInputException, VistaDataNotFoundException,
DataException, ServiceException, VistaTemplateException
     String collectionID =
getStringLocal(VistaFolderConstants.FOLDER_ID_KEY);
     long firstStartTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
HashMap resultSetMap = null;
String isNonRecursive = getStringLocal(VistaFolderConstants
.ISNONRECURSIVE_KEY);
if (isNonRecursive != null
&& isNonRecursive.equalsIgnoreCase(
VistaContentFetchHelperConstants.STRING_TRUE))
VistaLibraryContentFetchManager libraryContentFetchManager =
new VistaLibraryContentFetchManager(
binderMap);
SystemUtils.trace(
VistaContentFetchHelperConstants.CONTENT_FETCH_TRACE,
"The input Parameters for Content Fetch = "
+ binderMap);
          resultSetMap = libraryContentFetchManager
.getFolderContentItems(m_workspace);
* used to add the resultset to the binder.
addResultSetToBinder(resultSetMap , true);
else
     long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
* isStandard is used to decide the call is for Standard or
* Extended.
SystemUtils.trace(
VistaContentFetchHelperConstants.CONTENT_FETCH_TRACE,
"The input Parameters for Content Fetch = "
+ binderMap);
String isStandard = getTemplateInformation(binderMap);
long endTimeTemplate = System.currentTimeMillis();
binderMap.put(VistaFolderConstants.IS_STANDARD,
isStandard);
long endTimebinderMap = System.currentTimeMillis();
VistaContentFetchManager contentFetchManager
= new VistaContentFetchManager(binderMap);
long endTimeFetchManager = System.currentTimeMillis();
resultSetMap = contentFetchManager
.getAllFolderContentItems(m_workspace);
long endTimeresultSetMap = System.currentTimeMillis();
* used to add the resultset and the total no of content items
* to the binder.
addResultSetToBinder(resultSetMap , false);
long endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
if (perfLogEnable.equalsIgnoreCase("true"))
     Log.info("Time taken to execute " +
               "getTemplateInformation=" +
               (endTimeTemplate - startTime)+
               "ms binderMap=" +
               (endTimebinderMap - startTime)+
               "ms contentFetchManager=" +
               (endTimeFetchManager - startTime)+
               "ms resultSetMap=" +
               (endTimeresultSetMap - startTime) +
               "ms getManager:getAllFolderContentItems = " +
               (endTime - startTime) +
               "ms overallTime=" +
               (endTime - firstStartTime) +
               "ms folderID =" +
               collectionID);
Edited by: 838623 on Feb 22, 2011 1:43 AM

Hi.
The Select statment accessing MSEG Table is Slow Many a times.
To Improve the performance of MSEG.
1.Check for the proper notes in the Service Market Place if you are working for CIN version.
2.Index the MSEG table
2.Check and limit the Columns in the Select statment .
Possible Way.
SELECT MBLNR MJAHR ZEILE BWART MATNR WERKS LIFNR MENGE MEINS
EBELN EBELP LGORT SMBLN BUKRS GSBER INSMK XAUTO
FROM MSEG
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE ITAB
WHERE WERKS EQ P_WERKS AND
MBLNR IN S_MBLNR AND
BWART EQ '105' .
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002361303'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5003501080'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002996300'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002996407'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5003587026'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5003587026'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5003493186'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002720583'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002928122'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002628263'.
Select
Regards
Bala.M
Edited by: Bala Malvatu on Feb 7, 2008 9:18 PM

Taking More Time while inserting into the table (With foriegn key)

Hi All,
I am facing problem while inserting the values into the master table.
The problem,
Table A -- User Master Table (Reg No, Name, etc)
Table B -- Transaction Table (Foreign key reference with Table A).
While inserting the data's in Table B, i need to insert the reg no also in table B which is mandatory. I followed the logic which is mentioned in the SRDemo.
While inserting we need to query the Table A first to have the values in TableABean.java.
final TableA tableA= (TableA )uow.executeQuery("findUser",TableA .class, regNo);
Then, we need to create the instance for TableB
TableB tableB= (TableB)uow.newInstance(TableB.class);
tableB.setID(bean.getID);
tableA.addTableB(tableB); --- this is for to insert the regNo of TableA in TableB.. This line is executing the query "select * from TableB where RegNo = <tableA.getRegNo>".
This query is taking too much time if values are more in the TableB for that particular registrationNo. Because of this its taking more time to insert into the TableB.
For Ex: TableA -- regNo : 101...having less entry in TableB means...inserting record is taking less than 1 sec
regNo : 102...having more entry in TableB means...inserting record is taking more than 2 sec
Time delay is there for different users when they enter transaction in TableB.
I need to avoid this since in future it will take more time...from 2 sec to 10 sec, if volume of data increases mean.
Please help me to resolve this issue...I am facing it now in production.
Thanks & Regards
VB

Hello,
Looks like you have a 1:M relationship from TableA to TableB, with a 1:1 back pointer from TableB to TableA. If triggering the 1:M relationship is causing you delays that you want to avoid there might be two quick ways I can see:
1) Don't map it. Leave the TableA->TableB 1:M unmapped, and instead just query for relationship when you do need it. This means you do not need to call tableA.addTableB(tableB), and instead only need to call tableB.setTableA(tableA), so that the TableB->TableA relation gets set. Might not be the best option, but it depends on your application's usage. It does allow you to potentially page the TableB results or add other query query performance options when you do need the data though.
2) You are currently using Lazy loading for the TableA->TableB relationship - if it is untriggered, don't bother calling tableA.addTableB(tableB), and instead only need to call tableB.setTableA(tableA). This of course requires using TopLink api to a) verify the collection is an IndirectCollection type, and b) that it is hasn't been triggered. If it has been triggered, you will still need to call tableA.addTableB(tableB), but it won't result in a query. Check out the oracle.toplink.indirection.IndirectContainer class and it's isInstantiated() method. This can cause problems though in highly concurrent environments, as other threads may have triggered the indirection before you commit your transaction, so that the A->B collection is not up to date - this might require refreshing the TableA if so.
Change tracking would probably be the best option to use here, and is described in the EclipseLink wiki:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Introduction_to_EclipseLink_Transactions_(ELUG)#Attribute_Change_Tracking_Policy
Best Regards,
Chris

Taking more time!

hi all,
i am using Forms [32 Bit] Version 6.0.8.24.1 (Production)
i am ultimate task is to read the data from excel and insert into the table. if any duplication of records then stop the process and tell the user that which records are repating..
i have used ole2 package to read data from excel.
i have two pl/sql table for further process.
one table is to inser whatever the data come from excel. 2nd table is to check for the existance of current record with the previously inserted record and 3rd table is do store the duplicated records.
i am inserting each record as it is to the table1. in the table 2 checking for the existance of the record. if current record match with the previous record then store that record into the 3 record.
at the end if the error_table(3rd table) row count is 0 then no duplication then write the 1st table data into the forms and save,else display the table 3(error table) data into the form and say to the user that these records are duplicating.
but its taking more time time.
can anybody tell me the logic which reduces the time consuption(better performance)
Thanks..

hi,
i don't think its a sql issue because if i entered manually(not through the excel upload) its just working fine. the form is database block. so i have not written any sql.
what i am duing is upload data from excel to plsql table check for the duplication if any duplication found display the error_plsql table else display the first table as i mentioned earlier. the 2nd table is to check for the existance of the current record(since i am reading from excel record by record).
Thanks..

Deletion of Data Mart Request taking more time

Hi all,
One of the Data Mart process(ODS to Infocube) has failed.
Im not able to delete the request in Infocube.
When delete option executed, its taking more time while im monitoring that job in SM37 and its not getting completed.
The details seen in the Job Log is as shown below,
Job started
Step 001 started (program RSDELPART1, variant &0000000006553, user ID SSRIN90)
Delete is running: Data target BUS_CONT, from 376,447 to 376,447
Please let me know your suggestions.
Thanks,
Sowrabh

Hi,
How many records are there in that request. Usually when you try to delete out a request it takes more time. Depending on the data volume in the request the deletion time will vary.
Give it some more time and see if it finishes. To actually know if the job is doing anything, goto SM50/51 and look at whats happening.
Cheers,
Kedar

Transport released it taking more time

Hi Every One,
As i want to transport the program with teir package , smartforms etc.
I created one transport request with transport of copies and include all package in that and released
Its taking more time
Status in the se01 showing request is released
log shows
Checks at Operating System Level         23.04.2010 12:45:48    (0) Successfully Completed
Pre-Export Methods                       23.04.2010 12:45:54    (0) Successfully Completed
Checks at Operating System Level         23.04.2010 12:47:23    (0) Successfully Completed
Pre-Export Methods                       23.04.2010 12:47:27    (4) Ended with Warning
Export                                   23.04.2010 15:28:29 Not yet executed
RDDIMPDP program is running parallel in background.
So what i have to check any suggestions please
Regards
Shashi

Hi Niraj,
i sheduled RDDIMPDP job for every 2 minute and it is running fine
what i done is i created another request and transported. its went fine and issue is solved.
but this request is still showing as before now i want to ckear this. how i can do this. shall i delete this request directly.. Any problem with this
I am pasting Log report last few lines
WARNING:
sapprd\sapmnt\trans\tmp\TRPKK900160.TRP is already in use (10), I'm waiting 4 sec (20100423124802). My name: pid 3788 on sapprd (APServiceTRP)
WARNING:
sapprd\sapmnt\trans\tmp\TRPKK900160.TRP is already in use (20), I'm waiting 1 sec (20100423124826). My name: pid 3788 on sapprd (APServiceTRP)
WARNING:
sapprd\sapmnt\trans\tmp\TRPKK900160.TRP is already in use (30), I'm waiting 4 sec (20100423124850). My name: pid 3788 on sapprd (APServiceTRP)
START INFORM SAP-SYSTEM OF TRP Q      20100423155230              BIPLAB       sapprd 20100423155222
START tp_getprots          TRP Q      20100423155230              BIPLAB       sapprd 20100423155222
STOP tp_getprots          TRP Q      20100423155240              BIPLAB       sapprd 20100423155222
STOP INFORM SAP-SYSTEM OF TRP Q      20100423155240              BIPLAB       sapprd 20100423155222
Regards
Shashi

I ried to reset my iphone its taking more than 12 hrs still going on,

i tried to reset my iphone its taking more than 12 hrs still going on,How much ususally it takes to rest the i-phone.

yes it is quite normal, simply dont worry.

Query accessing SSAS cube is taking more time in power view report

Hi,
My SSAS server is having 16 Core's . I have created a power view in sharepoint site, which is accessing ssas cube.
The report is taking more time to show the result. I traced the DAX query using SQL Server profiler. When I ran this DAX query in SSAS server directly, then its taking less time but when the same query running from sharepoint server (power view) , it
is taking more time. Number of records in the fact table is 300M .
Also i tracked the %process time in performance monitor, mostly the line is below 20%. I think the CPU is not fully utilized..
Could you please help me to improve the performance of my report.
Regards,
Arun

Hi Arun,
According to your description, you create a PowerView report in SharePoint site connect to SSAS cube, the problem is that it take long time to show the result in the report, now you want to improve report performance, right?
In your scenario, you said that it takes more time to return the result in PowerView report than run the query directly in SSMS. For a report, its run time contain retrieval data time and render report time. So it takes more time to return the result in
PowerView report than run the query directly in SSMS. And there are 300M records in the fact table, the performance can be caused by large data. Here is a blog which describes tracks down Power View performance problems.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/psssql/archive/2013/07/29/tracking-down-power-view-performance-problems.aspx
Regards,
Charlie Liao
TechNet Community Support

Suddenly ODI scheduled executions taking more time than usual.

Hi,
I have set ODI packages scheduled for execution.
From some days those are taking more time to execute themselves.
Before they used to take 1 hr 30 mins approx.
Now they are taking 3 - 3 hr 15 mins approx.
And there no any major change in data in terms of Quantity.
My ODI version s
Standalone Edition Version 11.1.1
Build ODI_11.1.1.3.0_GENERIC_100623.1635
ODI packages are mainly using Oracle as SOURCE and TARGET DB.
What things should i check to get to know reasons of sudden increase in time of execution.
Any pointers regarding this would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Mahesh

Mahesh,
Use some repository queries to retrieve the session task timings and compare your slow execution to a previous acceptable execution, then look for the biggest changes - this will highlight where you are slowing down, then its off to tune the item accordingly.
See here for some example reports , you might need to tweak for your current repos version but I dont think the table structures have changed that much :
http://rnm1978.wordpress.com/2010/11/03/analysing-odi-batch-performance/

INSTR() function is taking more time

im using the below query select query in my procedure.
select distinct SUPPLIER_CIRCUIT_ID from SUPPLIER_DATA
where INSTR(i.SYSTEM_CIRCUIT_ID,SUPPLIER_CIRCUIT_ID) > 0;
I am taking SYSTEM_CIRCUIT_ID in cursor.
This query is taking more time. Is that possiblt to create function based index and speed up the query?

Hi,
Welcome to the forum!
993620 wrote:
im using the below query select query in my procedure.
select distinct SUPPLIER_CIRCUIT_ID from SUPPLIER_DATA
where INSTR(i.SYSTEM_CIRCUIT_ID,SUPPLIER_CIRCUIT_ID) > 0;
I am taking SYSTEM_CIRCUIT_ID in cursor.Show exactly what you're doing.
Whenever you have a problem, post a complete test script that people can run to re-create the problem and test their ideas.
See te forum FAQ {message:id=9360002}
This query is taking more time. Is that possiblt to create function based index and speed up the query?Sorry, unless you doing something very specific (such as alwyas looking for the same sub-string) then a function-based index won't help.
Oracle sells a separate product, called Oracle Text, for this kind of searching.
You might try LIKE:
WHERE i.SYSTEM_CIRCUIT_ID LIKE '%' || SUPPLIER_CIRCUIT_ID || '%'If you're using a cursor, then that's probably slowing the process down much more than the part you're showing.

Query is taking more time to execute in PROD

Hi All,
Can anyone tell me why this query is taking more time when I am using for single trx_number record it is working fine but when I am trying to use all the records it is not fatching any records and it is keep on running.
SELECT DISTINCT OOH.HEADER_ID
,OOH.ORG_ID
,ct.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID
,ool.ship_from_org_id
,ct.trx_number IDP_SHIPMENT_ID
,ctt.type STATUS_CODE
,SYSDATE STATUS_DATE
,ooh.attribute16 IDP_ORDER_NBR --Change based on testing on 21-JUL-2010 in UAT
,lpad(rac_bill.account_number,6,0) IDP_BILL_TO_CUSTOMER_NBR
,rac_bill.orig_system_reference
,rac_ship_party.party_name SHIP_TO_NAME
,raa_ship_loc.address1 SHIP_TO_ADDR1
,raa_ship_loc.address2 SHIP_TO_ADDR2
,raa_ship_loc.address3 SHIP_TO_ADDR3
,raa_ship_loc.address4 SHIP_TO_ADDR4
,raa_ship_loc.city SHIP_TO_CITY
,NVL(raa_ship_loc.state,raa_ship_loc.province) SHIP_TO_STATE
,raa_ship_loc.country SHIP_TO_COUNTRY_NAME
,raa_ship_loc.postal_code SHIP_TO_ZIP
,ooh.CUST_PO_NUMBER CUSTOMER_ORDER_NBR
,ooh.creation_date CUSTOMER_ORDER_DATE
,ool.actual_shipment_date DATE_SHIPPED
,DECODE(mp.organization_code,'CHP', 'CHESAPEAKE'
,'CSB', 'CHESAPEAKE'
,'DEP', 'CHESAPEAKE'
,'CHESAPEAKE') SHIPPED_FROM_LOCATION --'MEMPHIS' --'HOUSTON'
,ooh.freight_carrier_code FREIGHT_CARRIER
,NVL(XX_FSG_NA_FASTRAQ_IFACE.get_invoice_amount ('FREIGHT',ct.customer_trx_id,ct.org_id),0)
+ NVL(XX_FSG_NA_FASTRAQ_IFACE.get_line_fr_amt ('FREIGHT',ct.customer_trx_id,ct.org_id),0)FREIGHT_CHARGE
,ooh.freight_terms_code FREIGHT_TERMS
,'' IDP_BILL_OF_LADING
,(SELECT WAYBILL
FROM WSH_DELIVERY_DETAILS_OE_V
WHERE -1=-1
AND SOURCE_HEADER_ID = ooh.header_id
AND SOURCE_LINE_ID = ool.line_id
AND ROWNUM =1) WAYBILL_CARRIER
,'' CONTAINERS
,ct.trx_number INVOICE_NBR
,ct.trx_date INVOICE_DATE
,NVL(XX_FSG_NA_FASTRAQ_IFACE.get_invoice_amount ('LINE',ct.customer_trx_id,ct.org_id),0) +
NVL(XX_FSG_NA_FASTRAQ_IFACE.get_invoice_amount ('TAX',ct.customer_trx_id,ct.org_id),0) +
NVL(XX_FSG_NA_FASTRAQ_IFACE.get_invoice_amount ('FREIGHT',ct.customer_trx_id,ct.org_id),0)INVOICE_AMOUNT
,NULL IDP_TAX_IDENTIFICATION_NBR
,NVL(XX_FSG_NA_FASTRAQ_IFACE.get_invoice_amount ('TAX',ct.customer_trx_id,ct.org_id),0) TAX_AMOUNT_1
,NULL TAX_DESC_1
,NULL TAX_AMOUNT_2
,NULL TAX_DESC_2
,rt.name PAYMENT_TERMS
,NULL RELATED_INVOICE_NBR
,'Y' INVOICE_PRINT_FLAG
FROM ra_customer_trx_all ct
,ra_cust_trx_types_all ctt
,hz_cust_accounts rac_ship
,hz_cust_accounts rac_bill
,hz_parties rac_ship_party
,hz_locations raa_ship_loc
,hz_party_sites raa_ship_ps
,hz_cust_acct_sites_all raa_ship
,hz_cust_site_uses_all su_ship
,ra_customer_trx_lines_all rctl
,oe_order_lines_all ool
,oe_order_headers_all ooh
,mtl_parameters mp
,ra_terms rt
,OE_ORDER_SOURCES oos
,XLA_AR_INV_AEL_SL_V XLA_AEL_SL_V
WHERE ct.cust_trx_type_id = ctt.cust_trx_type_id
AND ctt.TYPE <> 'BR'
AND ct.org_id = ctt.org_id
AND ct.ship_to_customer_id = rac_ship.cust_account_id
AND ct.bill_to_customer_id = rac_bill.cust_account_id
AND rac_ship.party_id = rac_ship_party.party_id
AND su_ship.cust_acct_site_id = raa_ship.cust_acct_site_id
AND raa_ship.party_site_id = raa_ship_ps.party_site_id
AND raa_ship_loc.location_id = raa_ship_ps.location_id
AND ct.ship_to_site_use_id = su_ship.site_use_id
AND su_ship.org_id = ct.org_id
AND raa_ship.org_id = ct.org_id
AND ct.customer_trx_id = rctl.customer_trx_id
AND ct.org_id = rctl.org_id
AND rctl.interface_line_attribute6 = to_char(ool.line_id)
AND rctl.org_id = ool.org_id
AND ool.header_id = ooh.header_id
AND ool.org_id = ooh.org_id
AND mp.organization_id = ool.ship_from_org_id
AND ooh.payment_term_id = rt.term_id
AND xla_ael_sl_v.last_update_date >= NVL(p_last_update_date,xla_ael_sl_v.last_update_date)
AND ooh.order_source_id = oos.order_source_id --Change based on testing on 19-May-2010
AND oos.name = 'FASTRAQ' --Change based on testing on 19-May-2010
AND ooh.org_id = g_org_id --Change based on testing on 19-May-2010
AND ool.flow_status_code = 'CLOSED'
AND xla_ael_sl_v.trx_hdr_id = ct.customer_trx_id
AND trx_hdr_table = 'CT'
AND xla_ael_sl_v.gl_transfer_status = 'Y'
AND xla_ael_sl_v.accounted_dr IS NOT NULL
AND xla_ael_sl_v.org_id = ct.org_id;
-- AND ct.trx_number = '2000080';
}

Hello Friend,
You query will definitely take more time or even fail in PROD,becuase the way it is written. Here are my few observations, may be it can help :-
1. XLA_AR_INV_AEL_SL_V XLA_AEL_SL_V : Never use a view inside such a long query , becuase View is just a window to the records.
and when used to join other table records, then all those tables which are used to create a view also becomes part of joining conition.
First of all please check if you really need this view. I guess you are using to check if the records have been created as Journal entries or not ?
Please check the possbility of finding it through other AR tables.
2. Remove _ALL tables instead use the corresponding org specific views (if you are in 11i ) or the sysnonymns ( in R12 )
For example : For ra_cust_trx_types_all use ra_cust_trx_types.
This will ensure that the query will execute only for those ORG_IDs which are assigned to that responsibility.
3. Check with the DBA whether the GATHER SCHEMA STATS have been run atleast for ONT and RA tables.
You can also check the same using
SELECT LAST_ANALYZED FROM ALL_TABLES WHERE TABLE_NAME = 'ra_customer_trx_all'.
If the tables are not analyzed , the CBO will not be able to tune your query.
4. Try to remove the DISTINCT keyword. This is the MAJOR reason for this problem.
5. If its a report , try to separate the logic in separate queries ( using a procedure ) and then populate the whole data in custom table, and use this custom table for generating the
report.
Thanks,
Neeraj Shrivastava
[email protected]
Edited by: user9352949 on Oct 1, 2010 8:02 PM
Edited by: user9352949 on Oct 1, 2010 8:03 PM

Taking more time in INDEX RANGE SCAN compare to the full table scan

Hi all ,
Below are the version og my database.
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
TNS for HPUX: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
I have gather the table statistics and plan change for sql statment.
SELECT P1.COMPANY, P1.PAYGROUP, P1.PAY_END_DT, P1.PAYCHECK_OPTION,
P1.OFF_CYCLE, P1.PAGE_NUM, P1.LINE_NUM, P1.SEPCHK FROM PS_PAY_CHECK P1
WHERE P1.FORM_ID = :1 AND P1.PAYCHECK_NBR = :2 AND
P1.CHECK_DT = :3 AND P1.PAYCHECK_OPTION <> 'R'
Plan before the gather stats.
Plan hash value: 3872726522
| Id | Operation         | Name         | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |              |       |       | *14306* (100)|          |
|   1 | *TABLE ACCESS FULL| PS_PAY_CHECK* |     1 |    51 | 14306   (4)| 00:02:52 |
Plan after the gather stats:
Operation     Object Name     Rows     Bytes     Cost
SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer Mode=CHOOSE
          1           4
*TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     SYSADM.PS_PAY_CHECK*     1     51     *4*
    *INDEX RANGE SCAN     SYSADM.PS0PAY_CHECK*     1           3After gather stats paln look good . but when i am exeuting the query it take 5 hours. before the gather stats it finishing the within 2 hours. i do not want to restore my old statistics. below are the data for the tables.and when i am obserrving it lot of db files scatter rea
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
_optimizer_cost_based_transformation string      OFF
filesystemio_options                 string      asynch
object_cache_optimal_size            integer     102400
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      10.2.0.4
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      choose
optimizer_secure_view_merging        boolean     TRUE
plsql_optimize_level                 integer     2
SQL> select count(*) from sysadm.ps_pay_check;
select num_rows,blocks from dba_tables where table_name ='PS_PAY_CHECK';
COUNT(*)
   1270052
SQL> SQL> SQL>
NUM_ROWS     BLOCKS
   1270047      63166
Event                                 Waits    Time (s)   (ms)   Time Wait Class
db file sequential read           1,584,677       6,375      4   36.6   User I/O
db file scattered read            2,366,398       5,689      2   32.7   User I/Oplease let me know why it taking more time in INDEX RANGE SCAN compare to the full table scan?

suresh.ratnaji wrote:
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
_optimizer_cost_based_transformation string      OFF
filesystemio_options                 string      asynch
object_cache_optimal_size            integer     102400
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      10.2.0.4
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      choose
optimizer_secure_view_merging        boolean     TRUE
plsql_optimize_level                 integer     2
please let me know why it taking more time in INDEX RANGE SCAN compare to the full table scan?Suresh,
Any particular reason why you have a non-default value for a hidden parameter, optimizercost_based_transformation ?
On my 10.2.0.1 database, its default value is "linear". What happens when you reset the value of the hidden parameter to default?

Taking more time to save report or prompt

Hi All,
When am saving report or prompt taking more time. When i tried to keep filter on Business Month column in report and when i click on All Choices in Filter to select particular value it is taking nearly 50 sec to get the values, hardly it contains 100 values in Business Month column. Please can any body let me know why this is taking more time to retrive the data in filter,saving report and prompt.
Any suggestions/help will be appreciated.
Regards,
Rajkumar.

Hi Rajkumar.
Is the source for your prompt a fact table or a dimensional table? Do you have indexes on the column in the database?
regards
John
http://obiee101.blogspot.com/

Data laods taking more time to complete

Hi,
we have some sale stats cubes which are laoding daily on avg Million records.
We are creating indexes after that then creating aggregates.
Both of these process are taking 2-3 hrs each.. even though we have 0 records in weekends its taking same time toc omplete.
Can anyone suggest us what will be better way to create indexes and roll up data?
Thanks
Sivaprasad

Are you compressing the InfoCubes after a specific period of time (e.g. requests 30 or more days old)? Compression will help reduce the number of aggregates and index addresses to create and therefore reduce the runtimes for each.

Clicking Drill Down Plus Sympol its taking more time

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for