Closing Balance of GL is not match with opeaning Balance

Hi Experts
We are yet go for Closing activities, but i am seeing that some of the GL's are showing incorrect balances between opening and closing balances
For Ex: Bank GL showing 563576 as closing balance in 2008 and the same GL is showing 459875 as opening balance in 2009
I heard that, this is because of not executing Closing Activities, i would like to know why SAP system is showing such way
Regards
Sreenivasulu

Hi,
This is because you would have posted transactions in the previous fiscal year after carrying out the carry forward of balances in FAGLGVTR.
You would need to execute FAGLGVTR again.
Trust this helps.

Similar Messages

  • India cash/bank book report is not matching with GL balance

    We have Changed one segment in cash account and cash clearing account for internal petty cash account.
    After changing the segment, Closing balance of India cash/bank book report is not matching with GL balance.
    Please help.
    Regards
    Suresh

    user702249 wrote:
    We have Changed one segment in cash account and cash clearing account for internal petty cash account.
    After changing the segment, Closing balance of India cash/bank book report is not matching with GL balance.
    Please help.
    Regards
    SureshPlease do not post duplicates -- India cash/bank book report is not matching with GL balance.

  • Balance in vendor recon account is not matching with the balance in subsida

    Dear All
    Balance in vendor recon account is not matching with the balance in subsidary ledger, the recons accounts inthe masters have been changed,how do i reconcile them

    Hi Surya,
    check f101 - tab parameter, flag Change recon acct.
    f101 carries out postings or gives you a simple list to determine all the open items with changed recon accounts.
    Best regards
       Horst
    Edited by: HorstRn on Jun 24, 2008 6:22 PM
    By the way.... this is the AM forum... Chance to get a solution is much higher in financials....

  • EBS Closing balance not matching with opening balance.

    Hi,
    The Scenario: The first file for EBS is uploaded. The Second file opening balance did not match with the first files closing balance.
    As per my understanding the system throws an information message that FB729 that the closing balance did not match with the opening balance. The docuemnts also gets posted
    Question: If the bank sends the corrected file after uploading the first error statement how will we update the corrected account statement with appropriate opening balace.
    Thanks,
    Raja.

    Hi Taro,
                 Thanks for your reply. Infact Initially I was of the same opinion that if there is inconsistency in the closing and opening balance SAP would not process the statement. Thanks for your investigation the sysytem is behaving differently for different formats.
                   The SAP note 947857 only deals with a particular scenario where there is no inconsistency between closing balance and opening balance but the error comes up.
                   I will try to explain why I am asking about a functionality which updates the opening and closing balances of a statement based on our past experiences:
                    If we receive a wrong statement with wrong opening balance from the bank it would take us two weeks to convince the bank  about the wrong opening balance and subsequently bank sending the corrected account statement. If the FB729 message is an error message then there is no option but to wait till two weeks to upload the next statements.
                   So I want SAP  to upload the wrong statement and the subsequent statements as they come form bank. To correct the opening and closing balances i want to check if there is some statndard functionality which can do this. Rather than Table update as you suggested I would prefer a custom program for this functionality if standard does not allow.
                    If the difference between closing and opening balance is due to a missing statement then SAP  has suggested a note "SAP Note 1025077 - Problem with uploading out-of-sequence BAI2 bank statement" which actually allows the out of sequence statements to be uploaded.
                     Finally I would prefer the option of the wrong statements to be uploaded into SAP in the order they have come from the bank and subsequent corrections to the statements as approved by the bank.
    Thanks,
    Raja.

  • Fund center reports Assigned values are not matching with ledger balances.

    Thanks for your Support. We have activated funds management in May-2009. And deactivated one or two times. Now the status is active.
    Now we are taking reports the assigned values are not matching with gl ledger balances.
    1. We need to update records for April- May.
    2. Records in between deactivated and activate time.
    Please suggest updating fund centers and commitments.
    Regards

    hi ELI
    i have checked the follwoing secnarios
    1. funds management deactivated.
    2. one document posted  with amount10000
    3. funds management activated.
    4. we have executed FMN0
    here no document is selected after execution.
    Please suggest what are the activities we need to do if i am wrong...
    Regards

  • Ed payable not matching with gl balances

    ed payable, ed cess and sedcess not matching with gl accounts. what would be the reason.

    Go to transaction FBL1N and leave the vendor number blank, run the balances for all the vendor line items.
    You need to restrict the balances to the reconciliation account in the selection parameters.
    This will show you all the balances in your Trade accounts payables in your balance sheet account.
    Usually there might be several reconciliation account created in the balance sheet for different vendor categories, i.e. inter co vendor, trade vendors, employee expenses, subcontractors etc.
    Please choose which account you want to reconcile to the vendor balances. Usually companies choose default A/P Rec account as 200000 and will proceed to build up rec accounts in this series. Review your reconciliation accounts in the vendor master and use this information in the FBL1N transaction. Hope this helps.
    Best - S

  • AR01 balance is not matching with FAGLL03 balance between the segments

    Dear Consultants
    I am facing one problem in Assets Reconciliation. I.e, the balance which is showing in AR01 report is not matching with FAGLL03 report for P & M Assets.
    In my client I have two segment . 1000 and 2000.            
    As per that reports of both AR01 and FAGLL03  effect is  as follows.
    1.     GL value is showing more by Rs.54,13,516.34  with  AR01 in 1000 segment in P &M at
                    31.03.2009
    2.     GL value is showing Less by Rs.54,13,516.34  with AR01 in 2000 segment  in P & M at
                    31.03.2009
    After uploading the legacy balances as on 30.06.2008,
    1.SAP Segmental Trail Balance has been tallied with Segmental Trial balance as 30.06.2008
    2.Except this P & M balances, remaining all assets were tallied between FAGLL03 and
      AR02 segment wise.
    3.acquisitions during the year also tallied and Over all at company code level balance from 01.04.2008 to 31.03.2009 also tallied for all Assets including this P &M.
    Cross check points:
    1.I have checked the cost center , profit center and segments assignment u2013ok
    2.I have tallied Profit center wise AR01 and FAGLL03. except, this P &M
    3. No Manual Entries has been posted
    So pls suggest me what could be possible reasons for this
    any how. my client maintained the legacy system till 31.03.2009 along with SAP. now as per Oracle we are matching this values. so ,what I am thinking is ,to match the balances in P &M between the segments, Shall I post the JV between these gment? because , as on  31.03.2009 legachy value is matching with AR01 values. 
    --Only problem between Legacy value and GL Value.
    --Depreciation not yet posted.
    --client is ready to pass required adjustement entries after posting the depreciation as on 31.03.2009 to 
      match with legacy balance
    --So ,I dont think it is not problem  if post the manual entry in Asset GL to match the balance between legacy and Fagll03 report
    --Over all Comapny code level plant and Machinery values is tallied with Legachy value
    early reply will be very highly appreicated
    Regards
    Edited by: Ramatulasi Marivada on May 27, 2009 10:33 AM

    Hello,
    Run ABST2 to know the difference between GL and Asset Accounting.
    Hope you must have reset the reconciliation accounts of assets OAMK and posted all the relevant GL asset balances. Note that initial asset balances loaded in AA will not automatically be transferred to GL. You need to pass the JVs.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Accumulated Depreciation Balance in AA is not matching with GL account

    Hi Guru's
    The balance of Accu. Depre. in AA is not equal to GL account balance. I ran report for one asset class, it shows Acc. Depre. Balance is 1,20,000 but I wanted to open FBL3N and gave GL account to getting balance is 1,00,000.
    Kindly help me for the incident.
    Thanks,
    MowliT

    Dear MowliT,
    For your trouble, the cause can be many so please refer to information below, it may help you to figure out the solution.
    Critical Factor
    The values in Asset Accounting do not agree with the balances of the general ledger accounts. As possible consequences, the external auditor might not be able to certify the closing, or it may not be possible for the closing to be submitted to tax authorities. 
    Recommendation and Troubleshooting Perform a reconciliation of the values of Asset Accounting with the balances of the general ledger accounts. We recommend the following procedure:
    1. Start report RAABST02. If the report logs differences in table EWUFI_BAL (table FAGLFLEXD if the New G/L functionality is active) , proceed with the following steps. If the report does not find any differences, the general ledger and subsidiary ledger are consistent to each other. 
    2. For the account concerned, compare the last two fiscal years using the account display transaction (FS10N or FAGLB03 in New G/L) in the General Ledger. If the closing balance and opening balance differ, you have to start the balance carryforward program again for the current year.
    3. Create two asset history sheets for the accounts involved using the following parameters:
    u2022     Limiting the account assignment or the asset class in the dynamic  selections 
    u2022     Sort version 0020 
    u2022     Group totals  
    u2022     Report date u2013 fiscal year end of prior year and current year
    u2022     Setting u201CDepreciation postedu201D  If the starting and final value of the asset   history  sheets are different, you should repeat the fiscal year change in asset accounting ( transaction AJRW).
    If the starting and final values are still different after you repeat the fiscal year change, then check to see if there is an asset with a capitalization date but without acquisition data. Follow the procedure outlined in SAP Note 194635.
    4. The asset history sheet for the previous year does not agree within itself when you cross-foot. In this case: 
        a) Start RAABST01 for accounts with line item management.
        b) Start RAABST02 for reports without line item management.
        c) If the balance carryforward is affected, you now have to reset the year-end closing, perform depreciation recalculation, possibly carry out a depreciation posting run, and then run the year-end closing again.
    5. The starting balance values of the current year do not agree with the value of the balance display. There are various possible causes, that then also require different actions on your part.
         a) The difference arose already during the legacy data transfer. In this case, contact SAP Remote Consulting.
         b) Missing line items. To see which line items are involved, see the log of RAABST01 or RAABST02. There are two possible scenarios: 
    u2022     Missing line items during asset acquisition. These can be created easily using report RACORR05. In the case of multiple account assignments, use report RACORR05A. 
    u2022     Missing line items during asset retirement. These can not be created using report RACORR05. In this case, contact SAP R/3 Support, describing the exact parameters of the asset concerned. 
        c) Line items with incorrect acquisition year. This situation is found at times with postings from invoice verification (transactions MRHR or MIGO). For correcting this problem, there are a number of correction reports that are listed in SAP Note 366848. If you are unsure of how to proceed, contact SAP Support. 
        d) Account determinations that have errors or are incomplete can also cause differences, which cause errors during the euro conversion, if not before. For these errors, you should now, at the latest, consider your results from point 2. 
        e) Manual postings to asset balance sheet accounts. In this case, contact SAP Remote Consulting, with the document numbers involved.

  • F.08 & fs10n balance is not matching with fbl3n balance

    Dear all
           i have a problem with FBL3N,FS10N,&F.08
    Example
             G/l a/c :14001200   Sundry Cr - Exp -Dom
           in fbl3n balance amount is =  16,820,645.64-
           in  Fs10n balance amount is =17,160,867.86-
            in f.08 balance=                     17,160,867.86-
    Am confused why system showing this mismatch
    Regards
         Ajeesh.s

    Hi Ajeesh,
    The problem you are facing may be due to the Special GL transactions(may be Down Payments made to Vendors/Sundry Crs). The balance can be matched only after you have cleared the items in the Spl GL with the T-Code F-54 only after the bills get approved. The last entry will be clearing with T-Code F-44.
    Hope this will solve your problem. Reply if you have any issue.
    Regards,
    Ashish

  • GL - Balances do not match with sum of Items

    Hi,
    I have a requirement in which I am pulling opening, closing balance and a list of all transactions (or items ) on a daily basis from GL to a flat file, and then loading in a third-party tool . Now, the issue is sum of all items (gl_je_lines ) should match with the diference of closing and opening balances.
    I reconcilied the items with Oracle's Journal Report. Items are matching.
    I also confirmed that closing balance of previous day matches with the opening balance of current date.
    But, ( closing balance ) - (opening balance) does not match with sum(items)
    I am using gl_daily _balances for opening and closing balance.
    Waiting for your inputs/suggestions..
    Yogini

    Hi,
    Thanks for the reply.
    I am not using GL_INTERFACE. The tables I am using for Daily balances are:
    gl_daily_balances
    gl_code_combinations
    chart_of_accounts
    And for the items, I am using gl_je_lines, gl_je_headers.
    Also, I am interested in Entered Amount in GBP as the Functional Currency is GBP and there are many transacitons in different foreign currencies.
    More updates : I found that I have calculate the Entered Amount in GBP from all Converted/Transferred/Entered amounts in different currencies.
    So, I tried the following :
    (Select Sum(end_of_date_balance)
    from gl_daily_balances
    where Currency_code = 'GBP'
    and currency_type = 'U'
    and accounting_date = sysdate -1 --Opening balance
    MINUS
    ( Select Sum(end_of_date_balance)
    from gl_daily_balances
    where Currency_code = 'GBP'
    and currency_type = 'C'
    and accounting_date = sysdate -1 --Opening balance
    This way, I got opening and closing balance, but still the differernce between opening and closing balance is not matching with the sum of Items.
    Any suggestions / inputs are highly appreciated.
    Yogini

  • GL balances are not matching with Fixed assets ledger

    Hi,
    Please suggest me regarding this...
    The issues is:when the legacy balances are uploaded in to sap there was the mistake.3 assets were entered twice(once in asset class 1250 & once in asset class 1300).It causes the GL balances are not matching with Fixed Asset balances(GL is less than FA).so now the client is asking to make manual entry by removing the recconcilation account settings and post manual entry then keep the reconcilation account as usual.They wanted to reverse the accumulated depreciation for the above 3 duplicated asssets for year 2007 & 2008.
    How can i achieve the below:
    1.GL balance was not equal (i.e lower) to FA ledger even at the time of go live(FI is lesser than FA)
    2.For this i need to post one manual entry in FI-GL with the GO-LIVE date.is it possible? suggest me how to post?
    3.After that i need to reverse the accumulated depreciation for the above 3 duplicated assets.how can i do this?
    4.After that i need to remove the above 3 duplicated assets,how can i?
    Please help me by giving your thoughts regarding this
    Thanks
    Sap Guru

    Hi,
    It is possible to post the adjustment entry from go live date provided you open the posting periods for the pervious year. (However this approach is not recommended for the following reasons - you have closed the books and must have published the results to local authorities. Adjustment now in the past year can cause some trouble from auditors etc. Secondly you are adjusting the GL balance for the last year, so you will have to complete the period end and year end closing for GL balances. So avoid kindly it)
    For your problem - Go to transaction code OASV and post adjustment entry for the current period. Also check if your field status of assets contain field for shutdown of assets. If not change your field status accordingly. Once adjustment is done you shutdown the asset so that it does not post depreciation in future depreciation runs. (this will cater to your need of eliminating the assets. If you retire the asset then you will have to deal with gain or loss on retirement of an asset. If you can accommodate this entry, then you can use this figure in the final adjustment entry.)
    Or Go to transaction code OAMK and set the recon account to post the adjustment entry.
    Reversal of depreciation is not possible in SAP. So the only way to reverse the accumulated depreciation is by changing the recon account or using OASV, and passing adjustment entry.
    regards
    Thomas

  • Vendor aging unreconciled bal. does not match with TB Acct. Payable balance

    Dear all,
    When i take unreconciled vendor aging report with selection creteria all vendor codes selected,aging date as 31/03/09 and posting date from 01/04/08 to date 31/03/09,Interval - 30 Days,By Journal postings
    Deticked all check boxes in it.
    Aging report total balance of all vendor does not match with account payable balance in Trial balance ?
    But for reconciled aging totals and trial balance total are same.
    How to solve it ? or i need to do any settings ?
    Jeyakanthan

    Hai!
    What version of SAP B1 u r using.
    I do got the same problem for my  customer. I did this..
    1. Run Aging Report for all Vendors. Donot check Recon Transaction.
    2. Export to Excel
    3. Run TB for BP selecting Vendors alone.
    4. Export TB to Excel.
    5. Find vendors who is having mismatch in their balance. (use V-Lookup in Excel)
    6. Run Detail G/L Transaction report for those Vendors one by one.
             *Selection from date: Age from date To date: Age To date *
             *Selection Reconcilled Transaction only
    7. Report Balance should be Zero. If not this problem is because of Internal Reconcillation.
    8. Open *Check and Restore Previous reconcillation * select the vendor, internal
    9. see the reconcillation details.
    10. see the posting dates. All should be in previous fiscal year. (I mean the reconcilled set should have same fiscal year ex: Recon -2 trans should be in same fiscal year)
    11. If, that is corrected and still difference exist means.
    12.Go to Manage Previous Reconcillation
    13. Select BP and Internal (Donot check system reconcill Trans)
    14. Check the Reconcillation wheather all in same fiscal year.
    Regards,
    Thanga Raj.K
    +91 9710445987

  • GR/IR account G/L balance does not match with BSIS table

    Hi,
    I am preparing a report which uses table BSIS.But the total in the table does not match with the GR/IR G/L balance account.When I click on balance item display in FS10N the entries match with that of BSIS but the total is different.Also how to factor the year opening balance entries in the report.
    Thanks
    Arun

    But that will slow down the system considerabley, because BSEG contains a huge data

  • GL account balance not matching with the total stock value

    Hi,
    The GL account balance is not matching with the total stock value in report RM07MBSTfor stock in transit, Can anyone please let me know, where should, I look into to verify the reason for difference.
    Quick response will be appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards

    I am able to solve this issue. My client has a customized report, which helped me to look into the details of stock in tranisit account. Stock in transit account actually include PPV and TPV alongwith standard cost.

  • KE30 Summary balance not matching with KE24 line item total

    Hello Experts,
    My client's are having one KE30 report and there are about 15-18 rows in the output.  About 12 rows agrees with the KE24 line item report and they inturn matches with FBL3N balance.  However, the balance 3-6 rows does not agree with the KE24 line items report.
    For the difference rows :
    The KE30 balance   USD 210000
    The KE24 balance   USD 229000
    The FBL3N balance USD 229000
    The KEAT figures    USD 229000
    Can anybody confirm which settings are missing, if any.
    Thanks & Regards.
    Vikas.

    Hi
    I think you will have to reconcile on case to case basis and identify the causes...
    It may also happen that some docs are posted with some blank chars and hence they are not featured in KE30 based on the selection parameters given during execution of report
    To mind, only these 2 points come
    1. Define a report restricting to chars like Comp Code, currency type (if applicable), version =0 and period... Do Not restrict on any other char and execute the report.. It has to match with KE24
    2. In the 5 to 6 lines where you have this issue, try to drilldown on each possible char in KE30 for these rows... and match each of this value with KE24... you will come to know where the problem lies
    Regards
    Ajay M

Maybe you are looking for