India cash/bank book report is not matching with GL balance

We have Changed one segment in cash account and cash clearing account for internal petty cash account.
After changing the segment, Closing balance of India cash/bank book report is not matching with GL balance.
Please help.
Regards
Suresh

user702249 wrote:
We have Changed one segment in cash account and cash clearing account for internal petty cash account.
After changing the segment, Closing balance of India cash/bank book report is not matching with GL balance.
Please help.
Regards
SureshPlease do not post duplicates -- India cash/bank book report is not matching with GL balance.

Similar Messages

The creditors report is not matching with the G/L account

Hi Gurus,
The creditors report is not matching with the G/L account ,where i can go and find out the differences ?
Please give me advice,
I will assign points
Thanks&Regards,
Kumar

Hi Kumar,
There could be three reasons.
1. You may have more than one recon accounts for different vendor groups. So, you need to select all the GL accounts when reconcile with Vendor balances.
2. You may have some special GL transactions, which may post to different reconciliation accounts. Please check Special GL transactions (Down payments so on)
3. Your vendor recon accounts may be changed after some postings. Please check. If changed, you need to select these GLs also for reconciliation with vendor balances.
Hope this will help you. If not clear please reply, I will explain you.
Pl. assign points if useful.
Thanks

AR01 balance is not matching with FAGLL03 balance between the segments

Dear Consultants
I am facing one problem in Assets Reconciliation. I.e, the balance which is showing in AR01 report is not matching with FAGLL03 report for P & M Assets.
In my client I have two segment . 1000 and 2000.
As per that reports of both AR01 and FAGLL03 effect is as follows.
1.     GL value is showing more by Rs.54,13,516.34 with AR01 in 1000 segment in P &M at
                31.03.2009
2.     GL value is showing Less by Rs.54,13,516.34 with AR01 in 2000 segment in P & M at
                31.03.2009
After uploading the legacy balances as on 30.06.2008,
1.SAP Segmental Trail Balance has been tallied with Segmental Trial balance as 30.06.2008
2.Except this P & M balances, remaining all assets were tallied between FAGLL03 and
AR02 segment wise.
3.acquisitions during the year also tallied and Over all at company code level balance from 01.04.2008 to 31.03.2009 also tallied for all Assets including this P &M.
Cross check points:
1.I have checked the cost center , profit center and segments assignment u2013ok
2.I have tallied Profit center wise AR01 and FAGLL03. except, this P &M
3. No Manual Entries has been posted
So pls suggest me what could be possible reasons for this
any how. my client maintained the legacy system till 31.03.2009 along with SAP. now as per Oracle we are matching this values. so ,what I am thinking is ,to match the balances in P &M between the segments, Shall I post the JV between these gment? because , as on 31.03.2009 legachy value is matching with AR01 values.
--Only problem between Legacy value and GL Value.
--Depreciation not yet posted.
--client is ready to pass required adjustement entries after posting the depreciation as on 31.03.2009 to
match with legacy balance
--So ,I dont think it is not problem if post the manual entry in Asset GL to match the balance between legacy and Fagll03 report
--Over all Comapny code level plant and Machinery values is tallied with Legachy value
early reply will be very highly appreicated
Regards
Edited by: Ramatulasi Marivada on May 27, 2009 10:33 AM

Hello,
Run ABST2 to know the difference between GL and Asset Accounting.
Hope you must have reset the reconciliation accounts of assets OAMK and posted all the relevant GL asset balances. Note that initial asset balances loaded in AA will not automatically be transferred to GL. You need to pass the JVs.
Regards,
Ravi

Balance in vendor recon account is not matching with the balance in subsida

Dear All
Balance in vendor recon account is not matching with the balance in subsidary ledger, the recons accounts inthe masters have been changed,how do i reconcile them

Hi Surya,
check f101 - tab parameter, flag Change recon acct.
f101 carries out postings or gives you a simple list to determine all the open items with changed recon accounts.
Best regards
Horst
Edited by: HorstRn on Jun 24, 2008 6:22 PM
By the way.... this is the AM forum... Chance to get a solution is much higher in financials....

Fund center reports Assigned values are not matching with ledger balances.

Thanks for your Support. We have activated funds management in May-2009. And deactivated one or two times. Now the status is active.
Now we are taking reports the assigned values are not matching with gl ledger balances.
1. We need to update records for April- May.
2. Records in between deactivated and activate time.
Please suggest updating fund centers and commitments.
Regards

hi ELI
i have checked the follwoing secnarios
1. funds management deactivated.
2. one document posted with amount10000
3. funds management activated.
4. we have executed FMN0
here no document is selected after execution.
Please suggest what are the activities we need to do if i am wrong...
Regards

EBS Closing balance not matching with opening balance.

Hi,
The Scenario: The first file for EBS is uploaded. The Second file opening balance did not match with the first files closing balance.
As per my understanding the system throws an information message that FB729 that the closing balance did not match with the opening balance. The docuemnts also gets posted
Question: If the bank sends the corrected file after uploading the first error statement how will we update the corrected account statement with appropriate opening balace.
Thanks,
Raja.

Hi Taro,
             Thanks for your reply. Infact Initially I was of the same opinion that if there is inconsistency in the closing and opening balance SAP would not process the statement. Thanks for your investigation the sysytem is behaving differently for different formats.
               The SAP note 947857 only deals with a particular scenario where there is no inconsistency between closing balance and opening balance but the error comes up.
               I will try to explain why I am asking about a functionality which updates the opening and closing balances of a statement based on our past experiences:
                If we receive a wrong statement with wrong opening balance from the bank it would take us two weeks to convince the bank about the wrong opening balance and subsequently bank sending the corrected account statement. If the FB729 message is an error message then there is no option but to wait till two weeks to upload the next statements.
               So I want SAP to upload the wrong statement and the subsequent statements as they come form bank. To correct the opening and closing balances i want to check if there is some statndard functionality which can do this. Rather than Table update as you suggested I would prefer a custom program for this functionality if standard does not allow.
                If the difference between closing and opening balance is due to a missing statement then SAP has suggested a note "SAP Note 1025077 - Problem with uploading out-of-sequence BAI2 bank statement" which actually allows the out of sequence statements to be uploaded.
                 Finally I would prefer the option of the wrong statements to be uploaded into SAP in the order they have come from the bank and subsequent corrections to the statements as approved by the bank.
Thanks,
Raja.

Ed payable not matching with gl balances

ed payable, ed cess and sedcess not matching with gl accounts. what would be the reason.

Go to transaction FBL1N and leave the vendor number blank, run the balances for all the vendor line items.
You need to restrict the balances to the reconciliation account in the selection parameters.
This will show you all the balances in your Trade accounts payables in your balance sheet account.
Usually there might be several reconciliation account created in the balance sheet for different vendor categories, i.e. inter co vendor, trade vendors, employee expenses, subcontractors etc.
Please choose which account you want to reconcile to the vendor balances. Usually companies choose default A/P Rec account as 200000 and will proceed to build up rec accounts in this series. Review your reconciliation accounts in the vendor master and use this information in the FBL1N transaction. Hope this helps.
Best - S

AR01 REPORT IS NOT TALLYING WITH GL BALANCE

Dear SAP Guru's
AR01 report is not tallying with CWIP gl. during our observation, we found that out of four CWIP assets two of them showing over balance and two of them showing under balance. but when i tried for settling these assets to actual assets, system shows no value for settlement. But when i try for Scrapping, system is allowing for scrapping from these CWIP assets. In General, when ever value is lying in the CWIP, system will allow for settlement, but why in these case it is not allowing. What could be the reason ..for .CWIP assets shows Under/Over value.
Please advice.
regds

Dear Ravi..
Thanks for your early reply...
01. As per the Program documentation, it shows that these report should be executed only before year end closing.
Is there any effect if i execute now.
02. For Your information, i know the exact difference of balance which both AR01 and CWIP GL shows, so to what extent this program ABST2)will help.
03.It would be helpful to me if you have any solution to resolve it.
04. Actually this problem was existing from more than 3 fiscal years...our auditors did not recognize it..now management recognised and want to rectify. If i reverse any entries it will effect previous Statutory reports, so without effecting the previous statements i have resolve it.
Regds,

GL Balance Report output not Matching with Material Stock

Hi,
Can we Match Reports MB5B (Stock on Posting Date) and S_ALR_87012301 (G/L Account Balance)???
Till March these reports are matching but from April 11, data not matching..
In tcode MB5B, we are looking Valuated Stock of Materials and in tcode s_alr_87012301 showing balances, which were matching earlier..
Plz guide...

Dear:
Execute the stock GL in FS04 to track the history of changes made to it. It is quite possible that post automatically tick was changed and some direct posting were made against this GL which ultimately caused discrepancies. If track is showing post automatic tick changed then it means some direct posting were made to it, Note the period in which it was changed and analyze the posting against this GL in that time span.
Regards

Investment order reporting does not match with AM

Hello,
We are exectuing two reports 1) internal order report( for investment order) and asset history sheet.
Both the report figures should match. but due to some reason the internal order report shows less value than asset history sheet.
What can be the possible reason for the differences.
BR,
Zulfikar

Hi
Check whether the sales order creation date and actually when you created the delivery ? if say u created the sales order yesterday with yesterday date as delivery date and carried out delivery process to day means. The delivery date in the delivery process will be today date in that case delivery date wont match with sales order. This is one case like that so many cases are there.
Material might not be confirmed etc....
Regards,
Mullai

KE30 report is not matching with KE24

Hi Experts,
In our Production System erroneously, COPA documents were archived during September 2010 (01.09.2010 to 16.09.2010).
Subsequently, these documents were re-created by SAP Standard transactionsKE4S and KE4SFI.
Before and after restoring COPA documents, KE30 report is not tallying when we compare with KE24 - especially for September 2010 month. It isworking fine for other months - like August and October 2010.
In view of the above, could you kindly provide us possible solution to make KE30 will work even for September 2010 - similar to other months.
Thanks & Regards,
Satya Srinivas

I'm not sure whether your KE30 report accesses summarization level data or not, but if you do use summarization levels in CO-PA, follow the steps below to correct this issue. Archive/Deletion removes line items from CE1XXXX but segment table CE3XXXX is not updated at this time which will cause the inconsistency. so..
Rebuild Segment table CE3XXXX for the complete fiscal year with program RKEREO31 (Reorganization of Segment Level - Actual) ..refer to SAP note 93051 for the complete guidelines..
(ii) After this, rebuild summarization levels using transaction KEDU as background job.
I have personally done these steps few times at different clients, you need to plan this properly and execute couple of times in testing system to estimate the run time and check the differences.
Regards,
Ganesh

Closing Balance of GL is not match with opeaning Balance

Hi Experts
We are yet go for Closing activities, but i am seeing that some of the GL's are showing incorrect balances between opening and closing balances
For Ex: Bank GL showing 563576 as closing balance in 2008 and the same GL is showing 459875 as opening balance in 2009
I heard that, this is because of not executing Closing Activities, i would like to know why SAP system is showing such way
Regards
Sreenivasulu

Hi,
This is because you would have posted transactions in the previous fiscal year after carrying out the carry forward of balances in FAGLGVTR.
You would need to execute FAGLGVTR again.
Trust this helps.

F.08 & fs10n balance is not matching with fbl3n balance

Dear all
       i have a problem with FBL3N,FS10N,&F.08
Example
         G/l a/c :14001200   Sundry Cr - Exp -Dom
       in fbl3n balance amount is = 16,820,645.64-
       in Fs10n balance amount is =17,160,867.86-
        in f.08 balance=                     17,160,867.86-
Am confused why system showing this mismatch
Regards
     Ajeesh.s

Hi Ajeesh,
The problem you are facing may be due to the Special GL transactions(may be Down Payments made to Vendors/Sundry Crs). The balance can be matched only after you have cleared the items in the Spl GL with the T-Code F-54 only after the bills get approved. The last entry will be clearing with T-Code F-44.
Hope this will solve your problem. Reply if you have any issue.
Regards,
Ashish

0FC_OP_01 extractor issues- DFFKKOPBW data not matching with

Hi All
We have an issue with the extractor 0FC_OP_01. Our business is comparing the values in
R/3 report u2013 G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277) with the
Open Items by GL Account report in BW .(actually these values in the BW report are coming from DFKKOPBW table in R/3) .
But since august, the R/3 G/L account balance report is not matching with the DFKKOPBW table balances. So bottom line the extractor 0FC_OP_01 is doing something wrong when populating the DFKKOPBW table which is causing these two reports to be out of balance
Did anybody face this kind of issue before? Please Advise.
FYI : We are following the same procedure to populate the DFKKOPBW table as in the below article.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a9996115-0b01-0010-b2b2-d9de0170a425;jsessionid=%28J2EE3417800%29ID0001499250DB01896329908162586522End
Thanks
KPK

In my case the Cube/PSA data itself is not matching with the R/3 report data.
Basically we run a job in R/3 in t-code FPBW with a Date id and Indentification. This job will pull the entries from base table DFKKOP into DFKKOPBW table .Then FRom this DFKKOPBW table data is loaded into PSA/Cube.
Here in my case the data in table DFKKOPBW itself is not matching with the R/3 report - G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277)) .
I am following the same procedure to run the JOb in T-code FPBW to populate the DFKKOPBW table as listed in the document at the above link. Moreover this difference in balances is occuring only starting from August ..Till July the balances in DFKKOPBW tally with the R/3report.
Please advise ..
Thanks
KPK

F_IT_01 does not match with FAGLGVTR

Hello All,
What is the reason for report F_IT_01 not matching with FAGLGVTR
Please advice

Hello,
I would not advise you to do such things in your environment.2 mins is very less time how could you be so sure a 2 min query is bad. And your second point is totally baseless it wouldtake a query a fraction of secondto read 1000 rows.My answer would be please
dont implement.
If you want to test below query might achieve the first requirement, I have not tested it please treat this query as hint and optimize or add anything if required.
If you schedule this query through agent for every 2 mins or 5 mins .It can achieve.But some query takes more time to rollback than to finish scheduling this would lead to unstable environment
USE MASTER
IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM TEMPDB.SYS.ALL_OBJECTS WHERE NAME LIKE '#KILL_CONNECTION')
BEGIN
DROP TABLE #KILL_CONNECTION
END
CREATE TABLE #KILL_CONNECTION
SESSION_ID INT
,TOTAL_ELAPSED_TIME BIGINT
,START_TIME DATETIME
INSERT INTO #KILL_CONNECTION
SELECT
SESSION_ID
,TOTAL_ELAPSED_TIME
,START_TIME
FROM SYS.DM_EXEC_REQUESTS
WHERE TOTAL_ELAPSED_TIME > 7200 AND SESSION_ID > 50
DECLARE @SESSION_ID BIGINT
DECLARE @CMD VARCHAR(1000)
DECLARE KILL_CONNECTION CURSOR FOR
SELECT SESSION_ID
FROM #KILL_CONNECTION
OPEN KILL_CONNECTION
FETCH NEXT FROM KILL_CONNECTION INTO @SESSION_ID
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SET @CMD = 'KILL ' + @SESSION_ID
EXECUTE (@CMD)
END
CLOSE KILL_CONNECTION
DEALLOCATE KILL_CONNECTION godrop table #Kill_connection
Please mark this reply as the answer or vote as helpful, as appropriate, to make it useful for other readers

India cash/bank book report is not matching with GL balance

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for