CME Extension Mobility, SIP configuration

Hi,
Need help with CME Extension Mobility with SIP Phones (7841). I'm using CME 10.5 and I configured the parameters below for extension mobility but the phones won't register right after I put the logout profile in the voice register pool.
They work normally when not in Extension Mobility though. Please help I need to deploy this to my customer soon.
hostname Router
boot-start-marker
boot system flash:c3900-universalk9-mz.SPA.154-3.M2.bin
boot-end-marker
no aaa new-model
no authentication logging verbose
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.20
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.254
ip dhcp pool Phones
network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 192.168.1.254
option 150 ip 192.168.1.254
no ip domain lookup
ip cef
no ipv6 cef
multilink bundle-name authenticated
cts logging verbose
voice-card 0
voice service voip
allow-connections h323 to sip
allow-connections sip to h323
allow-connections sip to sip
sip
bind control source-interface GigabitEthernet0/1.10
bind media source-interface GigabitEthernet0/1.10
registrar server expires max 600 min 60
voice register global
mode cme
source-address 192.168.1.254 port 5060
max-dn 110
max-pool 110
load 7841 sip78xx.10-1-1SR1-4
time-format 24
date-format D/M/Y
service https
url authentication http://192.168.1.254/CCMCIP/authenticate.asp
tftp-path flash:
create profile sync 0002641841434163
voice register dn 1
number 6001
name Poh Huat - 6001
label Poh Huat - 6001
voice register dn 4
number 6005
name Coordinator - 6005
label Coordinator - 6005
voice register pool 1
logout-profile 100
busy-trigger-per-button 2
id mac 547C.69D6.1AB6
type 7841
voice register pool 4
logout-profile 100
busy-trigger-per-button 2
id mac 547C.69D6.1A2F
type 7841
voice logout-profile 100
pin 1234
user 6000 password 12345
number 6000 type normal
speed-dial 1 999 label "EMERGENCY"
voice user-profile 1
pin 12345
user richard password richard
number 6001 type normal
speed-dial 1 996506901 label "Richard"
voice user-profile 2
pin 12345
user 6005 password 12345
number 6005 type normal
license udi pid C3900-SPE100/K9 sn FOC16145MQA
license boot module c3900 technology-package uck9
username xtra privilege 15 secret 5 $1$STRs$Qsuesm8dF23Okof.vRyf5.
redundancy
ip ftp username xtra
ip ftp password xtra2006admin
interface Embedded-Service-Engine0/0
no ip address
shutdown
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
ip address dhcp
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.10
encapsulation dot1Q 10 native
ip address 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.0
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
no ip address
shutdown
duplex auto
speed auto
ip forward-protocol nd
ip http server
no ip http secure-server
ip http path flash:
nls resp-timeout 1
cpd cr-id 1
tftp-server flash:PHONES/sip78xx.10-1-1SR1-4.loads alias sip78xx.10-1-1SR1-4.loads
control-plane
mgcp behavior rsip-range tgcp-only
mgcp behavior comedia-role none
mgcp behavior comedia-check-media-src disable
mgcp behavior comedia-sdp-force disable
mgcp profile default
gatekeeper
shutdown
telephony-service
authentication credential 6000 12345
em keep-history
max-ephones 110
max-dn 110
service phone webAccess 0
max-conferences 8 gain -6
transfer-system full-consult
create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Mar 05 2015 15:50:52
I have turned on debug ip http all and debug voice em-profile on and right after I entered the logout profile 100 under pool i get the following logs.
Router(config-register-pool)#
Mar 5 16:15:28.299: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 16:15:28 GMT 192.168.1.21 /CMEserverForPhone/serviceurl ok
Protocol = HTTP/1.1 Method = GET Query = locale=English_United_States&name=SEP547C69D61A2F
Mar 5 16:15:28.299:
Mar 5 16:15:28.299: Getting SIP phone index by IP address 192.168.1.21
Mar 5 16:15:28.299: SIP phone 4 found with contact IP address 192.168.1.21
Mar 5 16:15:33.363: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 16:15:33 GMT 192.168.1.21 /CMEserverForPhone/serviceurl ok
Protocol = HTTP/1.1 Method = GET Query = locale=English_United_States&name=SEP547C69D61A2F
Mar 5 16:15:33.363:
Mar 5 16:15:33.363: Getting SIP phone index by IP address 192.168.1.21
Mar 5 16:15:33.363: SIP phone 4 found with contact IP address 192.168.1.21
Mar 5 16:15:37.539: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 16:15:37 GMT 192.168.1.21 /CMEserverForPhone/extensionmobility ok
Protocol = HTTP/1.1 Method = GET
Mar 5 16:15:37.539:
Mar 5 16:15:37.539: Getting SIP phone index by IP address 192.168.1.21
Mar 5 16:15:37.539: SIP phone 4 found with contact IP address 192.168.1.21
After this the phones are still not registering, I'm suspecting it is the url authentication command, as i can't put the application-name and password after the command, any suggestions would be appreciated. THanks in advance.
-richard

Try adding:
voice register global
url authentication http://192.168.1.254/CCMCIP/authenticate.asp secretname psswrd
if still doesn't work try to compare your config with the reference guide here:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/admin/configuration/guide/cmeadm/cmemobl.html#pgfId-1163414
-Terry
Please rate all helpful posts

Similar Messages

How to Configure Extension Mobility

Hello friends,
I am presently at crossroad on getting Extension Mobility to work on a CUCM 7(1)2. I have exhausted as many cisco docs on doing this. Please can someone who has not got just the book knowledge but with experience(s) should please give me a detailed step by step way in getting it configured and working!
Thanks!

If you're following this doc:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/fsgd-712-cm/fsem.html
And still can't make it work, you're doing something wrong, that's the doc everyone who has configured EM (and 90% is the same no matter the version) has followed to configure this.
Read the doc, digest the info, then carefully go step by step thru the config.

3905 SIP phone does not support extension mobility?

Does any one can confirm if 3905 SIP phone support extension mobility? I subscribed "extension mobility" service under phone, but I can not see it after I press "application" button on the phone. But I can not find any document says 3905 does not support it. Anyone can confirm that?
Thank you.

Hello,
3905 phones do not support Extension Mobility, check out the phones comparison below:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/sites/default/files/legacy/1/5/5/15362551-ip_phone_comparison_matrix.pdf
Thank you,
Shadi

CUCM 8.6.2 - SURL Buttons Issue related to Extension Mobility

Hello Guys,
we are running a CUCM 8.6.2.22900-2 with the extension mobility service. One the user device profiles we have applied several third application services via SURL buttons. Actually I though it does not matter, what device type I choose during the UDP Creation. The Buttons should appear on every model, which support SURL.
When I log into a 8945 with a 9971 user device profile, the SURL buttons do not show. It only works, if I create a dedicate UDP Profile with the 8945 type as base. The same for other models of the 89er/99er Series.
Can you help? Is this a bug?
Thanks.

Chris:
Thanks for the input. We do have the LDAP configured, we are using LDAPS. It is looking like port 636 form the CUP server is trying to reach out to the AD server so we are opening up that port to test if that is out issue. 636 is open from CUCM to AD but not CUP to AD.
TD

Extension Mobility in CUCM 7.1: How to send Userid and Pin with Service Par

Hi at all
is it possible to configure the IP Phone Service (CUCM 7.1)for Extension mobility so that when a user login in EM they dont need to insert the UserID and UserPin???
I think it could work with the Service Parameter but I dont know how.
Have somebody an idea?
Thanks.
kind regards
JosÃ©

Hi!
As far as I know that's not possible and it will defeat the purpose of using Extension Mobility as anyone could login from a phone with no credentials. Porbably you could configure a script or something that allows you to accomplish this, but it won't be supported.
Regards,
Teresa.
If you find this post helpful, please rate! :)

Extension mobility redundancy in CUCM 8.5

Hi ,
I have a doubt in cucm 8.5 extension mobility redundancy.
I have 3 call managers in cluster.
1. X.X.X.1 - punlisher
2. X.X.X.2 - sub1
3. X.x.X.3 - sub3
i have configured CUCM X.X.X.2 (sub 1) for extension mobility URL and in exterprise parameter configuration also (service URL). all phones are subscribed this URL and users login.
my schenerio is,
if SUB1 goes down, i change enterprise parameter service URL IP to punblisher. is that enough for users to login to extension mobility?
my doubt is,
in the above schenerio,
users press services button, request will go to enterprise parameter URL> enterprise URL will check for subscribed services> and route the request to the subscribed services for the phones . but here i have subscribed only EM service which has sub1 IP address.
how user can login?
if users can login meas, how that works.
or do i need to create 2 EM service (one for SUB1 IP, another one for PUB IP) and subscribe all the phones with both the services?
so that if subscriber fails user will login another service with has publisher IP?
I have activated EM service in all call managers inthe cluster.
please clarify my doubts.
thanks

Hi
Yes , the extension mobilty HA is avilable starting from V8 .On earlier verions as v 7 is not supported, Please find the below link:-
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/8x/cmapps.html#wp1189079
I think you have to deploy SLB (server load balancer) to distribute requests through servers . You can use load balancer as (F5 , or DNS round robin).
Note:The problem , is that the "Login" and "Logout" service URLs can really only point to one IP address. Please find the below solution based on DNS:-
- create multiple DNS records for the same name which will point to two CCM servers running the EM service
- point your EM service URL at that hostname which you have created on 1 step.
- ensure your phones have valid DNS servers assigned to resolve the above
Note: the problem on the DNS is the delay between requests.
Thank you
please rate all useful information

Multi forest LDAP and Extension mobility

hello,
We want to support the following configuration:
MultiForest LDAP integration with CUCM 10.5.
So we want to set the "LDAP Attribute for User ID" on UserPrincipalName (UPN). > [email protected]
We also want to support Extension Mobility.
Is there a way to make te login proces easier than logging in with [email protected] and the PIN code?

Unfortunately no, the EM process uses whatever you chose for userID for the login.

Extension mobility - can i have 2 extension mobility profiles with the same extension for a 7970 phone and a 7975 phone?

extension mobility - can i have 2 extension mobility profiles with the same extension for a 7970 phone and a 7975 phone? thanks

Yes, or simply configure 1 UDP and default device profile for the other one.
EDIT: and actually with those models, you should be able to use just one
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/10_0_1/ccmfeat/CUCM_BK_F3AC1C0F_00_cucm-features-services-guide-100/CUCM_BK_F3AC1C0F_00_cucm-features-services-guide-100_chapter_011000.html#CUCM_RF_EDCB3C30_00

Strange problem with Extension Mobility and Click to Call

Can anyone explain how is it possible ? Any ideas, guys?
CUCM 7.1.3
PC1 with IP comm. and user1 is logged in to Extension Mobility + Click to Call. User1 can make a call using Click to Call.
PC2 with IP comm. and user2 is logged in to Extension Mobility + Click to Call. User2 can't make a call using Click to Call.
The following error appears on the PC2 screen:
"The call failed. Please ensure you are logged into your Extension Mobility device. If the problem persists contact your phone administrator"
Here is the log from PC2:
2010-02-03 12:49:46,781 [16] INFO - 1 devices returned from ParseDevices
2010-02-03 12:49:46,781 [16] DEBUG - 0) MY IPC - Cisco IP Communicator - SEP0022680B43E9
2010-02-03 12:49:48,703 [1] DEBUG - entering FindCallRecord - 26468949
2010-02-03 12:49:48,703 [1] INFO - matched tag with call record - 26468949
2010-02-03 12:49:48,703 [1] INFO - action - new call: ct:Click to Call;rt:20100203-12494870;pn:26468949;pt:;cn:desk phone ct:;desk phone rt:;desk phone pn:;desk phone pt:;soft Phone cn:soft Phone ct:;soft Phone rt:;soft Phone pn:;soft Phone pt:;soft Phone cn:
2010-02-03 12:49:48,734 [1] DEBUG - ClickToCallDialer server and port10.100.3.1:8443
2010-02-03 12:49:48,734 [1] INFO - make call through WD - 26468949
2010-02-03 12:49:48,734 [1] INFO - MakeCall: user(a.koltalo) to(26468949) with profile(a.koltalo;Extension Mobility Phone;;True)
2010-02-03 12:49:51,859 [1] ERROR - make call failure through WD - CALL_FAILURE_ERROR
2010-02-03 12:49:51,859 [1] DEBUG - entering WriteRecord - 26468949
2010-02-03 12:49:51,859 [1] INFO - record already exists, go through records to remove matched record - C:\Documents and Settings\Jevgenij\Application Data\Cisco\Click to Call\Data\Outbound\26468949.xml
2010-02-03 12:49:51,859 [1] DEBUG - entering ReadRecord - C:\Documents and Settings\Jevgenij\Application Data\Cisco\Click to Call\Data\Outbound\26468949.xml
2010-02-03 12:49:51,875 [1] DEBUG - push call record into stack
2010-02-03 12:49:51,875 [1] DEBUG - write record into file
2010-02-03 12:49:51,875 [1] INFO - outbound call record changed, fire event to notify
2010-02-03 12:52:08,484 [17] DEBUG - ClickToCallDialer server and port10.100.3.1:8443
2010-02-03 12:52:08,593 [17] DEBUG - entering QueryDevices - 10.100.3.1 - a.koltalo
2010-02-03 12:52:08,656 [17] INFO - return success from GetDevices -
User2 moves from PC2 to PC1 - run IP comm. do loggin to Extension Mobility and run Click to Call with his credentials. User2 can make a call using Click to Call
User1 moves from PC1 to PC2 - run IP comm. do loggin to Extension Mobility and run Click to Call with his credentials. User1 can't make a call using Click to Call
PC2 and PC1 - have the same configuration and software installed, both PCs are on the same LAN subnet. There are no any firewalls between PCs and CUCM server.

Sounds like a possible permissions issue on the workstation to me. Have you tried configuring one of your test users as the local admin on the workstation?

Extension Mobility

All of my users have primary phones at their desks that are never shared. I would like to set up spare phones at spare desks for travelers to log into with Extension Mobility. Is there a way to configure this such that every line and speed dial from their primary phones will be shown. From what I've found, we will have to manage the phone (lines and speed dials) separately from the user device profiles. For example, adding a speed dial would be done on both phone and user device profile.

Is there a reason not to just make everything extension mobility? Even if their permanent desk phone is not shared, they could log in and not have to log out. Then you'd just have to manage the extension mobility profile, not the profile and an additional phone.

Failover config for Extension Mobility

Hi,
I have CCM3.3(3) loaded on publisher & subscriber.Extension mobility,Tomcat service is running on both servers.In IP phone services URL, I have givem publishers ip address.In Cisco Extension Mobility Logout,I have configured "True" for Login Service Enabled field in both the servers.
When I shutdown Publisher,EM is not working on all the phones.When I shutdown Subscriber,EM is not working on few phones.But EM is working on all phones when both servers are up.
Should I configure something additional to build redundancy .I want to configure subscriber as primary & Publisher as secondary for EM.
I am using 7940 IP phones.
Regds
Jagadish

Text below from Cisco Engineer Marcos Massakawa, about TAC case of this problem with extension mobility.
The problem, as you noted, is that the "Login" and "Logout" service URLs can really only point to
one IP address. In your case, you'd probably have these set up to point to whichever server you
wanted to be the primary one for Extension Mobility. However, if that server failed, the "Login"
and "Logout" services will no longer be useable, since they point to an IP that is no longer
reachable. If you want to enable users to be able to login and logout from the backup server, you'd
have to install EM on the other server, and create a slightly different service name that would show
up on the users' phones as a valid service, such as "Login2"/"Logout2", or "Login Backup"/"Logout
Backup", etc. The service URL for these services would point to the IP of the backup server. It
seems kind of clumsy, but it's a limitation of only being able to put one IP in the service URL.
Best Regards
Joao Medeiros

QM 8.5.2 SR2 (8.5.2.18) and 9971 extension mobility recording NBR

Hi,
Does anyone know if network based recording on a 9971 works with extension mobility users?
I can get Network based recording to work with QM if I put the users extensions on the phone itself, but it doesn't record when they log in with extension mobility profile and the EM profile is 9971 type and has recording profile set on the extension on the device profile, etc.
I need extension mobility for these users as they move around and need recording to work and call center won't let them log in if I put the extension on the phone and they log in to another phone with EM.
I've found some other forum posts suggesting this may not be supported but not really sure and can't find it mentioned in the documentation.
In QM I do have all the 9971s phone used by the EM agents under VoIP devices as well as their user profiles and the agent id is selected for the user profile (not the phone) under VoIP devices. The recording server is set correctly for the phone and the recording type is Network Based. I can't set the Monitor server for the phone and I can't set the recording or monitor server or recording type for the user profiles.
Thanks

I understand you need to configure only Agent name in voip device, it is not prefered method to hardcode phone if it is used by multiple agents.
bala

IP Telephony: CCME extension mobility any third party options?

We have a requirement for extension mobility with several CCME deployemnst (100 offices globaly).
Are there "any" options available
If not there should be as this is a common PBX feature and in the SMB (20-60) user market there is a massive requirement.
Cisco do shareholders a favour and increase shareholder profit therfore wack it in 4.1 of CCME criky what are you not thinking.

It may be roadmapped..
Probably a good question for CME product manager
I am not aware of a third party suite that supports this. I will check to see if there are any.
Sankar.

UC560 Extension Mobility Logon Button, Possible?

Is it possible to have either a softkey or replace a line button with an Extension Mobility logon button?
Our customer has UC560 (CME 8.1) with SPA504G handsets.
Thanks in advance
Matty

yeah I would like to know this too, its crazy that you have to go so deep into the menu to just logon or off.
I thought that's what the login softkey was for!

UCE + Extension Mobility without using CUE

Hi all,
Im trying to set up extension mobility without using a CUE module.
I have the configuration set up correctly, but im having all sorts of issues with the url services.
Can anyone offer any insight / requests for information that might help work this one out?
Cheers

I've thought about this a few times... to me it seems that the options on CUCM just aren't comprehensive enough, and what's needed is an overhaul to the EM service rather than changes on CUCM.
i.e. for 90% of organisations, use sAMAccountName for user ID
for the other 10%, use UPN
But for EM... have more intelligence in the EM service to allow login with extension and PIN, with some intelligence for resolving conflicts if they exist, which then looks up the correct associated account based on the extension number and authenticates with that account name (UPN/sAMAccountName) and PIN against the CUCM DB.
Aaron

CME Extension Mobility, SIP configuration

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for