Color management of web galleries

When I export web galleries the color of the photos shifts to the red. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to correct this?

Bill,
I'm having the same problem.  My exported web galleries are all shifted to the red.
Here's an example: http://venture-multimedia.com/photoshoots/jim/index.html
The guy looks like he has a sunburn.  In lightroom he looks fine.  I checked on two diff computers and the web gallery looks red on both, yet in lightroom it looks fine.
Just switched to Windows 7 and I'm wondering if that has somthing to do with it.
Suggestions please?!?!?!

Similar Messages

  • Color management for flash galleries

    I have recently found out that Flash 10 (currently in beta) supports color management (finally!). However, for it to work it needs to be enabled by the flash application itself. Therefore, I'd like to request the Lightroom team to enable color management for the LR2 flash web galleries.
    Thanks for reading!
    Simon

    Bill,
    I'm having the same problem.  My exported web galleries are all shifted to the red.
    Here's an example: http://venture-multimedia.com/photoshoots/jim/index.html
    The guy looks like he has a sunburn.  In lightroom he looks fine.  I checked on two diff computers and the web gallery looks red on both, yet in lightroom it looks fine.
    Just switched to Windows 7 and I'm wondering if that has somthing to do with it.
    Suggestions please?!?!?!

  • Color management for web and print.

    Hi there.  I would like to post my images and have them print ready for clients.  When I read about both of these I find one thing for web and one thing for print. I don't want to edit them twice. What would you suggest for easiest workflow?  I like to post the images in an online gallery for my clients and if I really like them maybe use on my homepage.  Do I have to edit twice or what is the optimal setting for a photographer.  I do mostly portraits --family, baby, couples, etc.
    I am pretty well versed in actual editing processes but my understanding in this portion is still lacking.  I am trying prophoto rgb on photos today, but will this compromise my online quality? 

    brwmmw wrote:
    …I knew of this option but did not know if it was optimal quality…
    You define the quality of the saved image in the Save for Web and Devices dialog box.
    brwmmw wrote:
    …I have just been… using same files for web and print.  I wanted to increase quality across the board in print and web…
    That is absurd!  (Sorry.) By doing that you are generating unconscionably and unnecessarily large image files.  You're clients won't like that.
    Remember that you have no control over how anyone sees your images on the web.  Something like 97% of Internet users are running non-color-managed web browsers and uncalibrated monitor.
    You and you're clients are best served when you stick to the lowest common denominator, namely sRGB images, for web.
    brwmmw wrote:
    …What mode do you use for prints?…
    Personally, I like to stay in 16-bit ProPhoto RGB when I print my images myself.  If sending them to a pro lab, I discussed it with the lab techs.  But I have gathered a lot of experience by now.  One really has to know exactly what one's doing to edit in ProPhoto RGB and stay in that color space.  If sending my images to a cheap lab like Costco, I stick to 8-bit tagged images that I soft-proof with the specific printer profile that will be used by the local store.
    You should—and probably do—know that ProPhoto RGB has a very wide gamut that includes colors that cannot be printed by many printers, and it's up to you to compensate for that.  If you run into problems with ProPhoto RGB consider converting to Adobe RGB for print.  Make sure the printer drivers that will be used to print actually support 16-bit printing, otherwise convert to 8-bit.
    Since you're a pro, I would warmly recommend you watch the video tutorials comprising the "From Camera to Print - Fine Art Printing" series by Jeff Schewe and Michael Reichmann, that are/were available for download from the Luminous Landscape.  They're working on a new 2011 edition, but the 2008 edition was just superb.  Best $35 or so I've spent in a long time.
    http://www.luminous-landscape.com/videos/camera-print.shtml
    Wo Tai Lao Le  (no connection to Adobe or Schewe/Reichmnan/Luminous_Landscape.)
    我太老了

  • Color management for Web Designing ?

    I want to know what is the best settings for Web design to use sRGB or Adobe RGB ?

    razorxdev wrote:
    ...most people seem to have more advanced monitors capable of wider gamuts...
    Hmmm... rather than just saying that most people seem to have advanced monitors, how about presenting some statistical facts on how many are using wide gamut displays?
    sRGB is the lowest common denominator. Most every display should be able to render at least that gamut. Catering to the lowest common denominator is what web design is all about (ie: MSIE).
    Wide gamut displays certainly change things for a web designer but they cannot (and should not) change things for everyone, including the majority that are still limited to sRGB.

  • Printing with HP B9180 and Photoshop Elements 8 and Color Management

     I've got a bit of confusion about certain settings in the printing process and I've posted a rather long discussion of my 'issues' and confusion.  I hope someone can give me some guidance here.  I've seen a lot of these issues addressed in many places but I can't seem to find an integrated response.  Thanks to anyone who takes the time to read and respond.
    Color Management Questions
    My problems started when I was getting pictures that were too dark from my HP 9180 printer after having gotten very nice prints for a long time.  I had obviously started to do something differently inadvertently.  The only thing I think that is different is that I got a new 23 inch monitor, which does produce much brighter on-screen images.  So, I started to do some research and know just enough about color management to be slightly confused and have some questions that I hope someone can give me some help with.
    Equipment Background
    I use both a Canon 20D and a Canon PowerShot SD600 camera. Both have the default color space as sRGB, although the 20D can be also set as RGB.
    I also use Photoshop Elements 8, where there are a variety of settings possible for printing.
    My monitor is an HP S2331, whose color space is sRGB and cannot be reset to RGB (I think) except for temperature; the default is 6500K.
    My printer is an HP Photosmart Pro B9180 Printer, where there are also a variety of settings possible.
    I’m running XP-Pro.
    Here’s Where I Get Confused
    Everything I have read about color management (various web sites, forums, books, etc) says to have the image, monitor, and printer all in the same color space.
    Everything I read about PSE 8 (same sources) says to set PSE 8 to ‘Always Optimize for Printing’ under Edit>Color Settings in order to get the best prints.  This displays photos based on the Adobe RGB color space. 
    I am taking pictures in sRGB, and telling PSE 8 to process them in RGB by selecting ‘Always Optimize for Printing’.  Is this something I should be concerned about?  Should I reset my camera for RGB?
    Further, by selecting ‘Always Optimize for Printing’, I am setting PSE 8 for RGB while my monitor displays sRGB.  Is this an important issue or is it also much ado about technicalities that an amateur should not worry about?  It does violate the ‘keep them in the same color space’ rule.
    Next, when I go to File>Print and get the Print window and then do the Page Setup and Select Printer, I then go to More Options in the lower left of the window.  Under the More Options window, I select Color management and select Photoshop Elements Manages Colors.  Next, there is Image Space, which is fixed and not subject to selection from a drop down menu. 
    I understand that this is the image space of the image I took with my camera and that information is embedded in the image.  Correct?
    Next, there is Printer Profile.  But, from what I have read, this is where the IEC profile of the paper being printed on is supposed to be selected, isn’t it? 
    Shouldn’t this more appropriately be called Paper Profile, or Printing Media Profile?  Further, this drop down menu appears to be somewhat erratic, sometimes showing all of the paper profiles I believe are loaded, sometimes not. It also shows listings such as Working RGB-Adobe RGB (1988), Adobe RGB 1988, Dot Gain 10%, 15%.... along with a lot of paper profiles.  Aren’t those profiles unnecessary here?
    I’ve used both Relative Colorimetric and Perceptual Rendering and am happy with either one. 
    Next, when I go to Printer Preferences, in order to “…disable color management in the printer preferences dialog”, under the Color Tab, I select Application Managed Colors from the Color management drop down menu, and also have the option of selecting ColorSmart/sRGB and Adobe RGB (1988).  
    Is there any time when I should use either ColorSmart/sRGB or Adobe RGB  (1988)?  If I were staying with my camera’s sRGB setting, given the fact that the monitor is sRGB, would the appropriate selections be ‘Printer Manages Colors’ and ‘ColorSmart/sRGB’?
    Finally, under the Features Tab, I go to look for the same paper I selected under Printer Profile (Question 4 above).  If it is one of the pre-loaded (by HP) profiles, it is there, but if it is a profile I downloaded, say for an Ilford paper, it isn’t listed, and I need to guess at an equivalent type of paper to select.
    Is there any way to get that listing to appear under the Paper Type drop down menu?
    I know that this is a long post, but it helped me to clarify my ‘issues’.  Thank you for any and all suggestions, answers, guidance and help.

    RIK,
    Some printers have long names, esp. HP printers, and PSE gets ":confused." In control panel>devices and printers, right click on the default printer, go to printer properties, and rename the default printer to something short, e.g. "Our Printer." That may fix it..

  • Web galleries: how to export the image list only?

    Hi there.
    I use Lightroom 5 for managing my web galleries, but I have my own software to run them. My workflow is this:
    I use "Publish to folder" to generate the needed JPEG images, and I use another software to sync them to my server
    I use the "Web Gallery" feature only to define the list and the order of photos in each gallery
    I use the "Export..." feature in Web Gallery to get the .XML file with the list of photos - this file can be directly read by my software
    The problem is that "Export..." also generates the images for the gallery, and after the XML has been generated I have to stop this task manually - it's an annoyance. Furthermore, it would be nice if I could export all my galleries in a single step, with multiple files generated, one per gallery.
    I don't need anything else other than the image file name: the metadata are extracted from JPEGs. All file formats would be ok (XML, TXT, JSON, whatever).
    Thanks.

    Lr doesn't support the workflow you describe. So, best option is to do a Google serarch for third party web galleries/plugins to see if any of them do.
    In menatime, you could submit a feature request at http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/products/photoshop_family_photoshop_lightro om

  • Color management in Save for Web not working

    The Save for Web dialog box in the CS6 Beta is ignoring color profiles, so color is not managed. This has not been a problem in previous versions.

    The saved output is just fine. I was referring to the images in the Save for Web dialogue
    I just checked my settings. CS6 apparently changed my Preview setting from "Use Document Profile" to "Monitor Color." It also changed my Metadata setting. It should not do that!
    Restoring the correct Preview setting solved the color management problem, but ONLY for the Preview image. The Original image is still not color managed.
    I'm on a wide-gamut monitor, so sRGB images come out looking garish if there's no color profile embedded or it's ignored. That's what's happening here with the Original image in Save for Web. I imported an sRGB image with profile embedded, and it looks just fine in Photoshop while editing. Then I went to Save for Web, with the settings Embed Color Profile, Convert to sRGB, and Preview: Use Document Profile. The JPEG preview too looks just fine with these settings, but the Original looks garish, showing a lack of color management. The color in the two views is showing as completely different, though they both represent the same image with the same color profile embedded.
    Going back to CS5, the same image is properly color managed in both Original and Preview. Both images show identical color, as they should.

  • Photoshop CS3 color management "Save for Web" problem

    This problem is getting the best of me.......
    After spending 3 full days researching this problem, I am no closer to finding an answer than when I started. I still cannot produce a usable image through the "Save for Web" feature of Photoshop CS3. I have read web page after web page of "Tips, Tricks and Recommendations" from dozens of experts, some from this forum, and still I have no solution... I am exhausted and frustrated to say the least. Here's the simple facts that I know at this point.
    I have a web design project that was started in PS CS1. All artwork was created in photoshop and exported to JPG format by using "Save for Web". Every image displays correctly in these browsers (Safari, Camino, FireFox and even Internet Explorer on a PC).
    I have recently upgraded to PS CS3 and now cannot get any newly JPG'd image to display correctly. My original settings in CS1 were of no concern to me at the time, because it always just worked, and so I do not know what they were. I have opened a few of my previous images in CS3 and found that sRGB-2.1 displays them more or less accurately. I am using sRGB 2.1 working space. Upon openning these previous image files, I get the "Missing Profile" message and of course I select "Leave as is. Do Not color manage". CS3 assumes sRGB-2.1 working space, opens the file, and all is well.
    The problem is when I go to "Save for Web", the saturation goes up, and the colors change. The opposite of what most people are reporting. Here's another important point... new artwork created in CS3 does exactly the same thing, so it's not because of the older CS1 files.
    I have tried every combination of "uncompensated color", "Convert to sRGB", "ICC Profile", etc. while saving. I have Converted to sRGB before saving, and my monitor is calibrated correctly.
    I have tried setting the "Save for Web" page on 2-up and the "original" on the left is already color shifted before I even hit the "Save" button. Of course, the "Optimized" image on the right looks perfect because I am cheating by selecting the "Use Document Color Profile" item. Why do they even have this feature if doesn't work, or misleads you?
    Does anyone have any ideas what could be happening here? Why is this all so screwed up?
    CS1 worked fine out of the box.
    Final note: I do have an image file I could send along that demonstrates how it is possible to display an image exactly the same in all 4 of the browsers I mentioned with no color differences. It is untagged RGB and somehow it just works.
    I am very frustrated with all of this and any suggestions will be appreciated
    Thanks,
    Pete

    >> First of all... I'm using an Adobe RGB image master... I open it and get the Profile Mismatch Screen... I choose Use Enbedded profile... all looks well. Next I go to Proof Setup > Monitor RGB... again all looks well, no change that I can tell.
    This has further confused the issue on several points, not the least of which version PS you are doing this with?
    >> AdobeRGB> Convert to Profile > Working Space sRGB-2.1... all still looks well... but now, when I go to Proof Setup > Monitor RGB... I see the insane oversaturated look that is driving me nuts.
    That is your strongest clue...it sounds like you have a bad system or bad monitor profile. To rule out the monitor profile: Set sRGB as your monitor profile in System Prefs> Displays> Color.
    >> Adobe RGB image master... I open it and get the Profile Mismatch Screen... I choose Use Enbedded profile... all looks well. Next I go to Proof Setup > Monitor RGB... again all looks well
    That doesn't make sense, stripping an embedded AdobeRGB profile should desaturate the color in Softproof MonitorRGB, especially the reds -- you have something wacky going on there.
    At this point I think you need to review the links and get a grip about how color management and profiles work...
    BTW, forget about setting ColorSync in PS COlor Settings, use Adobe ACE.
    MO,
    I think SFW is fixed under CS3 :) By default it Converts to sRGB and strips the profile.

  • Problem: Color Management/Save for Web on Wide Gamut Monitor

    Hi,
    I've got a problem with color management - I thought I understood it, but it seems as if didn't. So I'm trying to kindly ask for help.
    I'm printing, and also trying to save an image for Web.
    My setup:
    - Win 7, CS 5
    - Calibrated Wide Gamut Monitor (eizo cg223w)
    - Photoshop set to ProPhoto (I don't want to start a discussion adobergb vs prophoto)
    - Save for Web and Devices, Embed Color Profile, Convert to SRGB
    - Viewing in Firefox 3.6 with Color Management enabled
    Problem:
    Image: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/311345/luchs-1024.jpg
    If I compare the file in Firefox and Photoshop, the Firefox presentation is slightly more saturated - and I have no idea why.
    I thought it should work with the above workflow.
    Here is a screenshot where you can clearly see a difference (Note: the additional over-saturation here is caused by the wide gammut monitor when taking screenshots, in reality its not as dramatic as that): http://imgur.com/MFPbU but you can clearly see the difference.
    I would be very very thankful for any pointers what I'm doing wrong in my workflow!
    Thanks in advance,
    Christoph

    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
    ch_bla wrote:
    - Monitor calibrated
    - Edit under ProPhoto RGB, 16 bit raw files
    - Save for Web and Devices, Embed Color Profile, Convert to SRGB
    Is this the preferred way?
    It's a reasonable and correct way to do it, assuming you want to embed a profile in the images.
    Since at least in some browsers and cases the colors selected within the HTML elements must match image colors, one can sometimes make a case for not embedding any profile at all, but that's really looking backwards.  Browsers are moving forward toward not only managing colors in images but also in the HTML elements themselves.  If you want your images accurately portrayed in as many places as possible you're doing the right thing looking forward.
    Personally I embed the sRGB profile in my web images, as you are doing.  And I check things primarily with IE and Safari.
    Unlike you, I prefer to edit using the sRGB color space, but that's just personal preference.  I find it more convenient to use File - Save As instead of File - Save For Web & Devices, and I get caught by gotchas less often this way.  Your preference ensures you don't lose any colors at the extremes of the gamut while editing and it could easily be argued that that's better, depending on what image products you produce.
    As for the article you mentioned, anyone who would set their preferred working space to Monitor RGB or use Proof Colors in normal editing is asking for trouble, and may not understand color management at all.
    -Noel

  • Best Color Management Settings for Web in CS3

    I've seen tons of info on what color management settings can be used in CS3, but most seemed to favor work for printing. I'm just wondering what settings people think are best for color and B&W photo web work in particular... I already have both the monitor and PS set for 'sRGB IEC61966-2.1', but other than that, there seems to be a lot of opinions. I just want everything to have the best chance of looking the same on other comps as it did on mine. I also have Proof Setup set to 'Monitor RGB'.
    Thanks,

    1. Calibrate (I use ColorVision's Spyder http://aps8.com/spyder.html , but any hardware calibration device will be better than calibration by eye).
    2. Set the Working Space to sRGB.
    3. Set the Color Management Policy for RGB to Convert to Working to be sure you are converting content to sRGB. (2 & 3 addressses pfigen's concern about making sure all images are sRGB.)
    4. Make sure your monitor is set to use the ICC profile generated by the calibration device.
    5. Turn off Proof Colors.
    6. Embed profiles or not, but if you do use the sRGB profile. Whether it gets used or not is another story.
    As far as B&W, pfigen suggests Gamma 2.2, which would seem to be right for PC. Mac users might consider Gamma 1.8.
    This should work well for most situations, but guaranteed consistency is an impossible task at this point.

  • Color managed workflow for web and camera raw

    I recently calibrated my monitor and was wondering what is the preferred workflow for the web? I shoot with my camera in sRGB and my working space in Photoshop is sRGB aswell. The problem that has arised now is that the color managed colors in Photoshop are way different than the non-color managed in my web browser. Is this normal? And what I don't quite get is how a photo that has an embed sRGB profile looks the same in Firefox (that understand embed profiles) and Photoshop, but in Google Chrome (that does not recognize embed color profiles) shows the colors very differently, although the browser should understand the photo is in sRGB by default and show the same colors that are in Photoshop, right? So what happens here, because the colors are not the same? What information does Photoshop assign to the embed color profile that makes the colors so different?
    Anyway, I assume the problem here seems to be my newly calibrated monitor profile. The only way I can get the same colors to my photo in Photoshop and to a photo in web is to use soft proofing set to my Monitor RGB AND save without a color profile. Is this the way to go? But here comes another problem. I shoot in RAW and use camera raw to edit my photos. Camera Raw doesn't allow soft proofing, so I'm stuck with these color managed colors that are so different from non-color managed colors I get in my browser that any color correction in Camera Raw is simply useless. Unless everyone was using color managed browsers and I could start to use fully color managed workflow, but that's not the case I suppose. So, what's the solution here?

    First off, you need to be working in sRGB, or converting to sRGB when you save out files that are destined for the web. You can change the color space that Camera Raw (ACR) send your raw files to by clicking the blue text in the bottom center of the ACR window. This is probably that safest workflow for you until you get a handle on color management. If the color of your images is very important, you might consider embedding a color profile in them, which will help color managed browsers render your color properly.
    If your display's color gamut is different than sRGB (many are), you'll find matching colors for non-color-managed browsers to be impossible. But consider the average display and take heart. The best you can do is correct to a standard and hope for the best.
    Both the convert to sRGB and embed color profile options are in the save for web dialogue box.
    More about the ACR workflow options here:
    http://help.adobe.com/en_US/Photoshop/11.0/WS739D7239-24A7-452b-92F9-80481C544F25.html
    More about matching colors for the web:
    http://help.adobe.com/en_US/Photoshop/11.0/WSB3484C68-ECD2-4fa4-B7CC-447A5FE86680.html
    http://help.adobe.com/en_US/Photoshop/11.0/WSD3F5E059-4F51-4b44-8566-13B854D3DF5F.html
    http://help.adobe.com/en_US/Photoshop/11.0/WS0B3CD652-4675-44be-9E10-445EB83C60BA.html

  • Color Management and files for web

    I'm doing a layout for a web page in AiCS(11). What are the correct color management policies I should use so the colors will display in Illustrator as they will on the web.
    So far I cannot find a combination that works. Even if I (i think) have color management off.
    Christo.

    Here's the more complete, accurate approach to this.
    In System preferences > Displays > Color run the calibration routine and set the gamma for your display profile to 2.2
    That has nothing to do with Illustrator or Photoshop color settings but everything to do with how well your display is prepared to show you how your images will look on Windows displays.
    In Illustrator, choose sRGB for your working RGB space.
    For profile mismatch policies, for RGB, "Convert to Working Space" is often a good choice for beginners who only do Web work. After you have studied up and practiced some, or if you do more general art prep in Illustrator, you may want to instead use "Preserve Embedded Profiles."
    I do a lot of Web and print work for a number of purposes. All in all, if you are preparing artwork for the Web, you will have best results if you profile your display with a colorimeter and work in sRGB. The only reason to preview in Monitor RGB is to preview how the image will look when the profile is stripped, or when it is displayed in an application ON YOUR CURRENT MONITOR ONLY that isn't color managed.

  • Color Management In Various Web Browsers For Untagged Images Broken Since 10.8 Upgrade

    I have recently updated my early 2008 Mac Pro to 10.8 and have noticed that neither Safari, Firefox or Chrome handle untagged images correctly anymore. Instead of assuming sRGB as the ICC profile for an untagged image (like they did prior to upgrading), they now just convert to monitor profile which looks over-saturated on my wide gamut monitor (Dell 3007WFPHC, hardware calibrated with a Datacolor Spyder 3 Pro). Color management in Photoshop, Lightroom and all other previosuly color-aware applications appears unaltered. The interesting thing is that in Safari, if I open a link with "open in new tab", the untagged images are rendered as if their color profiles are sRGB and are displayed correctly! But just clicking the link in the same tab or "open in new window" results in the incorrect over-saturated colors. This doesn't make any sense. Anyone else have this same issue?

    After digging around, I found that the behavior of Firefox can be changed to assume sRGB on untagged images by putting about:config into the address bar and changing the value of gfx.color_management.mode to 1. I vaguely recall doing something similar for Chrome years ago, but can't for the life of me rememebr what I did. When upgrading to 10.8, I did a fresh install so any mods to Chrome are no longer present.
    As for Safari, I have never really used it and only notcied it behaved similarly when trying it because Chrome wasn't working. Still can't figure out why Safari works correctly when you select "open in new tab" though. Maybe this should be moved to the Safari forum?

  • Web color management in CS5

    I understand there are a number of threads on the subject, but since most of them recommend embedding profiles, I started a fresh one.
    I want Photoshop to display the same colors as the web browser, with the following "save for web" stipulations:
    - No embedded profile (it balloons the file size and not all browsers support them, leading to inconsistent display).
    - No profile conversion (if I have color #bb8800 in my html code and in my image, I need them to match).
    With CS-CS3, I did my web work in generic RGB and saved for web with "embed profile" and "convert to sRGB" turned off. This workflow kept the color consistent in Photoshop, in the "save for web" dialog box, and in the browser.
    With CS5, it does not work anymore and I cannot find a workflow that maintains the color.

    I'm missing something here. I set everything as you suggest, and the colors in Safari are much more saturated than in Photoshop. Or I should say, the colors are a lot less saturated in Photoshop.
    Top left shows HTML color blocks.
    Bottom left is untagged photoshop image.
    Right is same image as displayed in Photoshop with sRGB profile assigned.
    As you see, the left images are a perfect match (as they should be, since the color #s match). The image in Photoshop is a lot less saturated.
    You are wrong in your understanding of "generic rgb". Untagged images are assumed to be the default working space (which for web work is sRGB).
    Actually we're both wrong. Generic RGB IS a profile. So the image IS tagged. But it's not as neutral as I assumed.

  • Color difference in web gallery

    I am having trouble matching color from my images in Bridge or PS (CS4) to the photos that appear when I make a web gallery using CS4.   The photos have been converted to sRGB and look vivid in Bridge or Photoshop.  However when they are converted into a web gallery and shown on a browser they are dull and lacklustre. 
    However if I upload one to my gallery on Mobile Me they look just fine.  It seems like Web Gallery in CS4 is doing something to them.
    I am using Safari and CS4 withMacbook Pro.   Is there something I am missing I wonder??  Any suggestions?

    >> I have opened the files in Safari, Firefox, Photoshop and Preview and they display correctly - even when profiles are changed
    that's expected in Safari, Photoshop and Preview
    Safari and Preview both automatically honor embedded profiles and Convert to Monitor RGB (you can't confuse them if your files have embedded profiles they get displayed correctly) — Safari and Preview both apply Monitor RGB to untagged files — I don't think we can change this behavior
    Photoshop can be confused in any number of ways by users opening tagged and untagged files, but it sounds like the same thing is happening correctly (Ps is Converting Source Space to Monitor RGB) — if we tell Photoshop Do Not Color Manage a file, it in essence applies/assign/assumes its "Working RGB" profile
    anything in CS4 saving for web (galleries) is more than likely stripping the profile(s) by application default
    the test would be to open the problem (web gallery-generated) file in Photoshop and first see if it has an embedded profile — then Assign various profiles until you hit the correct profile — if someone doesn't understand how profiles work then that likely whooshed out the other ear by now, but that is a very presice step to ID the problem
    if someone is having this problem, this is how to figure out what's happening — learn how your workflow deals with profiles/color spaces
    the way to fix it would be making sure your Save For Web (gallery) Converts to sRGB and strips the profile (CS4 Adobe default setting)

Maybe you are looking for