Column indexes when generating tables

Hi.
Could you tell me is it possible to create column indexes using JPA 2 API when autocreating tables at application startup? If not, what to do in situation when i need to search for an entity in database containing 1 million records if search parameter is not a primary key and moreover could be duplicated?
Thank you.

I don't believe that TopLink DDL gen supports creating tables with Column indexes. However, you can use the scripts that are generated by TopLink and modify them to create your own scripts with indexes.

Similar Messages

Retrieving JTable column number when clicked

Hello, I'm new in this forum but not so new to java.....but I'm really worried about an issue with an application made using Swing.
Well , my problem is with JTables. It's about selecting a table cell in order to get the column index when selected. Ok I'm able to get the column index when the cells are simple cells, but the problem appears when the cell is a JComboBox....It's imposible to retrieve the column index. I was trying and trying but finally I couldn't see what the solution is......and I must get that problematic index....
Please, I really need and advice.
Thanks in advance for your help
Best Regards
Mariojulio Zaldivar

Hello, I created a short example of my java class:
* NewClass.java
* Created on 26 de octubre de 2007, 0:03
* To change this template, choose Tools | Template Manager
* and open the template in the editor.
package pruebas;
import java.awt.Container;
import java.awt.Dimension;
import java.awt.event.MouseAdapter;
import java.awt.event.MouseEvent;
import javax.swing.*;
public class TableDemoApplet extends JApplet {
JTable table;
public TableDemoApplet() {
createGUI(getContentPane());
public void createGUI(Container contentPane) {
Object[][] rowData = new String[][] { {"98-43", "AraAra! SL"},
{"81-31", "Aragones Transports SA"},
{"12-72", "Rocca SL"},
{"99-10", "Rodriguez e Hijos SA"},
{"00-65", "Rimbau Motors SL"} };
table = new JTable(rowData, new String[] {"Part No", "Provider"});
JComboBox companyComboBox = new JComboBox(new Object[] {"AraAra! SL", "Aragones Transports SA", "Rocca SL", "Rodriguez e Hijos SA", "Rimbau Motors SL"});
companyComboBox.setEditable(true);
//new S15WorkingBackspace(companyComboBox);
// setup the ComboBoxCellEditor, DefaultCellEditor won't work!
table.getColumnModel().getColumn(1).setCellEditor(new ComboBoxCellEditor(companyComboBox));
table.getSelectionModel().setSelectionMode(ListSelectionModel.SINGLE_SELECTION);
table.setPreferredScrollableViewportSize(new Dimension(400, 100));
addListener();
JScrollPane scrollPane = new JScrollPane(table);
contentPane.setLayout(new java.awt.FlowLayout());
contentPane.add(scrollPane);
contentPane.add(new JTextField("HALLO!"));
public void addListener(){
/*table.addMouseListener(new MouseAdapter(){
public void mouseClicked(MouseEvent e){
int column = table.getSelectedColumn();
table.addMouseListener(new MouseAdapter() {
public void mouseClicked(MouseEvent e) {
// get most recently selected column index
int column = table.getSelectedColumn();
System.err.println("numero de columna: " + column);
public static void main(String[] args) {
javax.swing.SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
JFrame frame = new JFrame();
frame.setDefaultCloseOperation(3);
TableDemoApplet demo = new TableDemoApplet();
demo.createGUI(frame.getContentPane());
frame.pack(); frame.setVisible(true);
I'm showing there the wrong behavior of the JTable, I hope this help you to help me :)
Thanks a lot for your time!!
Greetings
Mariojulio Zaldivar

How to read the column name of a table from sap system using C#?

Hi!!
I am using SAP .NET connector and creating a windows application.
Now I wanna read the column name when a table name is given....
Connection is done, but I don't know the code to read the column names alone...
Can anyone help me with the code??

fine!!
So if i give the table name, which the RFC_READ_TABLE function module have, will it run properly? or i wanna change all the codes in order to support RFC_READ_TABLE function module?
Because from the beginning I was using BAPI_CUSTOMER_GETLIST function, but my client requirement is to use ERP function module RFC_READ_TABLE, he didn't give any table name also..
This is my code: What I have to change in this???
ECCDestinationConfig ECCDestination = new ECCDestinationConfig();
            RfcDestinationManager.RegisterDestinationConfiguration(ECCDestination);
            RfcDestination rfcDest = null;
            rfcDest = RfcDestinationManager.GetDestination(a);
                RfcRepository repo = rfcDest.Repository;
                IRfcFunction customerList = repo.CreateFunction("BAPI_CUSTOMER_GETLIST");
                IRfcTable addressData = customerList.GetTable("AddressTable"));
                int j = addressData.Metadata.LineType.FieldCount;
                for (int i = 0; i < j; i++)
                    RfcElementMetadata metadata = addressData.GetElementMetadata(i);
                    listallcolumn.Items.Add(metadata.Name);
Message was edited by: Jeswin Rebil

Issues with using XMLType indexes against a table with XMLType column

I am attempting to use an XMLIndex with a Structured Component and not having too much luck. Not much data in metalink nor is the documentation very helpful:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/appdev.112/e10492/xdb_indexing.htm#BCGHGIGC
The table DDL is as follows:
CREATE TABLE ECI_SCHEMA.REV_ITEM_EARN_DTL_VIRTUAL(
REV_ITEM_EARN_DTL_ID_NBR NUMBER(16,0) NOT NULL,
UNIQ_MSG_ID_NBR VARCHAR2(50) NOT NULL,
REV_ITEM_BILL_DTL_ID_NBR NUMBER(16,0),
PLAN_RACN_NBR NUMBER(10,0) NOT NULL,
INV_DTL_IMG SYS.XMLType NOT NULL,
NON_INV_DTL_IMG BLOB NOT NULL,
PART_KEY_CD GENERATED ALWAYS AS (MOD(PLAN_RACN_NBR,5)) VIRTUAL,
LAST_UPDT_TMSTP TIMESTAMP(6) NOT NULL,
INV_ID_NBR NUMBER(16,0),
ITEM_STATUS_CD VARCHAR2(1) DEFAULT 'A' NOT NULL
LOB (NON_INV_DTL_IMG) STORE AS NON_IDI_LOB (CHUNK 8192 PCTVERSION 10 CACHE)
TABLESPACE ECI_DATA
PARTITION BY RANGE (PART_KEY_CD)
PARTITION RIED_DAY0_PART
VALUES LESS THAN (1)
TABLESPACE ECI_DATA
PARTITION RIED_DAY1_PART
VALUES LESS THAN (2)
TABLESPACE ECI_DATA
PARTITION RIED_DAY2_PART
VALUES LESS THAN (3)
TABLESPACE ECI_DATA
PARTITION RIED_DAY3_PART
VALUES LESS THAN (4)
TABLESPACE ECI_DATA
PARTITION RIED_MAXVAL_PART
VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE)
TABLESPACE ECI_DATA
XMLTYPE COLUMN "INV_DTL_IMG" STORE AS OBJECT RELATIONAL
XMLSCHEMA "someXdbDocument.xsd"
ELEMENT "revenueInvoice"
According to the documentation, I should be able to create a structured XMLIndex on the XMLType column with the following syntax:
SQL> create index eci_schema.rev_item_earn_dtl_virt_xmlix on eci_schema.rev_item_earn_dtl_virtual
2 (INV_DTL_IMG)
3 INDEXTYPE IS XDB.XMLIndex
4 parameters ('PATH TABLE RIED_PATH_TABLE')
5 local;
When I do this, I get the following error:
create index eci_schema.rev_item_earn_dtl_virt_xmlix on eci_schema.rev_item_earn_dtl_virtual
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-29958: fatal error occurred in the execution of ODCIINDEXCREATE routine
ORA-30959: The indexed column is not stored in CLOB.
What am I doing wrong? Based on the Oracle documentation, I was under the impression that 11.2 XMLIndex would work with Object Relational storage. Is this not the case?

CREATE INDEX ECI_SCHEMA.REV_ITEM_EARN_DTL_IX7
       ON ECI_SCHEMA.REV_ITEM_EARN_DTL
                  extractValue(inv_dtl_img, '/revenueInvoice/service/transportation/mstrTrkngNbr')
TABLESPACE ECI_REV_ITEM_EARN_DTL_IX7_ITS
LOGGING
PARALLEL(DEGREE 8 INSTANCES 1)
LOCAL
/Elements that occur at most once in each document can be indexed using extractValue(). Despite the fact that the index appears to be a functional index, when we create the index we automatically re-write the create index into a normal btree index on the column that contains the value for the element identified by the xpath.
Eg in the case of a functional index based on extractValue, defined on XMLType using Object relational storage, with an xpath that identifies a node that occurs at most once in each document is not a functional index, it's re-written into a plain old vanilla btree index. You can actually check this by looking in the system tables
Eg
SQL> connect system/oracle
Connected.
SQL> select table_name, index_name from all_indexes where owner = 'OE' and table_name = 'PURCHASEORDER';
TABLE_NAME                     INDEX_NAME
PURCHASEORDER                  LINEITEM_TABLE_MEMBERS
PURCHASEORDER                  ACTION_TABLE_MEMBERS
PURCHASEORDER                  SYS_C0011037
SQL> alter session set current_schema = OE
2 /
Session altered.
SQL> create unique index PO_REF_INDEX on PURCHASEORDER (extractValue(object_value,'/PurchaseOrder/Reference'));
Index created.
SQL> set lines 250
SQL> select index_name, index_type from all_indexes where owner = 'OE' and table_name = 'PURCHASEORDER';
INDEX_NAME                     INDEX_TYPE
PO_REF_INDEX                   NORMAL
LINEITEM_TABLE_MEMBERS         NORMAL
ACTION_TABLE_MEMBERS           NORMAL
SYS_C0011037                   NORMAL
SQL> select * from dba_ind_expressions where table_name = 'PURCHASEORDER' and index_owner = 'OE'
2 /
no rows selectedFrom the above we can see that the index created on extractValue has been re-written in a plain old vanilla BTREE index, and there is no definition for it in dba_ind_expressions So assuming you were able to create the index and insert the data you should find that your index is not a functional index.
]

Actual Column Name for Index when Function is used?

Hi,
We have some indeces where the column in oracle is actually a function in the form UPPER('column-name'). When I query user_ind_columns I get something like SYS_NC0012$ for the column name. Where would I be able to actually query the actual column it's using in the index? So that I can query the exact column name if need be. Don't ask why cause this is a developer asking me this and they are doing some sort of a comparison between indexes between two application.
Here is the SQL for the Index and the Table associated with it
create table BATCH_HEADER2
PAYMENT_TYPE VARCHAR2(17),
BATCH_TYPE VARCHAR2(40) not null,
BATCHNUM NUMBER not null,
BRANCH VARCHAR2(16),
BATCH_TIME NUMBER,
USER_LOB VARCHAR2(16),
PAYEE_TYPE VARCHAR2(40),
PROGRESS_RECID NUMBER,
CHEQUE_TYPE VARCHAR2(60),
SCANNERBATCHNO NUMBER,
RECEIPTCOUNT NUMBER
alter table BATCH_HEADER2
add constraint PK_BATCH_HEADER2 primary key (BATCH_TYPE, BATCHNUM)
using index
tablespace FT1_DATA;
--Inxes
create unique index FT1DSTINT.BATCH_HEADER2##BYNUM on FT1DSTINT.BATCH_HEADER2 (UPPER(BATCH_TYPE), BATCHNUM)
tablespace FT1_DATA
pctfree 10
initrans 2
maxtrans 255
storage (initial 64K
minextents 1
maxextents unlimited);

From Oracle's standpoint, though, it isn't indexing BATCH_TYPE. It's indexing an arbitrary function that happens to take BATCH_TYPE as an input. As far as Oracle is concerned, you might just as easily be indexing an expression that took a dozen column names as parameters, so it doesn't really make sense for Oracle to try to break down anything beyond the function.
Of course, you could always parse the expression and extract the column name, but I would be dubious that's the right answer... If a developer is comparing indexes between columns, there is a heck of a lot of difference between an index on BATCH_TYPE, and index on UPPER(BATCH_TYPE) and an index on SOME_OTHER_FUNCTION( BATCH_TYPE ).
Justin

How to prevent Oracle from using an index when joining two tables ...

How to prevent Oracle from using an index when joining two tables to get an inline view which is used in an update statement?
O.K. I think I have to explain what I mean:
When joining two tables which have many entries sometimes it es better not to use an index on the column used as join criteria.
I have two tables: table A and table B.
Table A has 4.000.000 entries and table B has 700.000 entries.
I have a join of both tables with a numeric column as join criteria.
There is an index on this column in table A.
So I instead of
where (A.col = B.col)I want to use
where (A.col+0 = B.col)in order to prevent Oracle from using the index.
When I use the join in a select statement it works.
But when I use the join as inline view in an update statement I get the error ORA-01779.
When I remove the "+0" the update statement works. (The column col is unique in table B).
Any ideas why this happens?
Thank you very much in advance for any help.
Regards Hartmut

I think you should post an properly formatted explain plan output using DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY including the "Predicate Information" section below the plan to provide more details regarding your query resp. update statement. Please use the \[code\] and \[code\] tags to enhance readability of the output provided:
In SQL*Plus:
SET LINESIZE 130
EXPLAIN PLAN FOR <your statement>;
SELECT * FROM TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY);Usually if you're using the CBO (cost based optimizer) and have reasonable statistics gathered on the database objects used the optimizer should be able to determine if it is better to use the existing index or not.
Things look different if you don't have statistics, you have outdated/wrong statistics or deliberately still use the RBO (rule based optimizer). In this case you would have to use other means to prevent the index usage, the most obvious would be the already mentioned NO_INDEX or FULL hint.
But I strongly recommend to check in first place why the optimizer apparently seems to choose an inappropriate index access path.
Regards,
Randolf
Oracle related stuff:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
SQLTools++ for Oracle:
http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

When do I really need to create indexes for a table?

Once I was talking to a dba in a conference.
He told me that not always I have to create indexes for a single table, it depends of its size.
He said that Oracle read registers in blocks, and for a small table Oracle can read it fully, in a single operation, so in those cases I don't need indexes and statistcs.
So I would like to know how to calculate it.
When do I really need to create indexes for a table?
If someone know any documment that explain that, or have some tips, I'd aprecciate.
Thanks.
P.S.: The version that I'm using is Oracle 9.2.0.4.0.

Hi Vin
You mentioned so many mistakes here, I don't know where to begin ...
vprabhu_2000 wrote:
There are different kinds of Index. B-tree Index is by default. Bit map index, function based index,index organized table.
B-tree index if the table is large This is incorrect. Small tables, even those consisting of rows within just one block, can benefit from an index. There is no table size too small in which an index might not be benefical. William Robertson in his post references links to my blog where I discuss this.
and if you want to retrieve 10 % or less of data then B-tree index is good. This is all wrong as well. A FTS on a (say) million row table could very well be more efficient when retrieving (say) just 1% of data. An index could very well be more efficient when retrieving 100% of data. There's nothing special about 10% and there is no such magic number ...
>
Bit Map Index - On low cardinality columns like Sex for eg which could have values Male,Female create a bit map index. Completely and utterly wrong. A bitmap index might be the perfect type of index, better than a B-Tree, even if there are (say) 100,000 distinct values in the table. That a bitmap index is only suitable for low cardinality columns is just not true. And what if it's an OLTP application, with lot's of concurrent DML on the underlining table, do you really think a bitmap index would be a good idea ?
>
You can also create an Index organized table if there are less rows to be stored so data is stored only once in index and not in table. Not sure what you mean here but an IOT can potentially be useful if you have very large numbers of rows in the table. The number of rows has nothing to do with whether an IOT is suitable or not.
>
Hope this info helps. Considering most of it is wrong, I'm not sure it really helps at all :(
Cheers
Richard Foote
http://richardfoote.wordpress.com/

How an INDEX of a Table got selected when a SELECT query hits the Database

Hi All,
How an Index got selected when a SELECT query hits the Database Table.
My SELECT query is as ahown below.
    SELECT ebeln ebelp matnr FROM ekpo
                   APPENDING TABLE i_ebeln
                   FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_mara_01
                   WHERE werks = p_werks      AND
                         matnr = i_mara_01-matnr AND
                         bstyp EQ 'F'         AND
                         loekz IN (' ' , 'S') AND
                         elikz = ' '          AND
                         ebeln IN s_ebeln     AND
                         pstyp IN ('0' , '3') AND
                         knttp = ' '          AND
                         ko_prctr IN r_prctr AND
                         retpo = ''.
The fields in the INDEX of the Table EKPO should be in the same sequence as in the WHERE clasuse?
Regards,
Viji

Hi,
You minimize the size of the result set by using the WHERE and HAVING clauses. To increase the efficiency of these clauses, you should formulate them to fit with the database table indexes.
Database Indexes
Indexes speed up data selection from the database. They consist of selected fields of a table, of which a copy is then made in sorted order. If you specify the index fields correctly in a condition in the WHERE or HAVING clause, the system only searches part of the index (index range scan).
The primary index is always created automatically in the R/3 System. It consists of the primary key fields of the database table. This means that for each combination of fields in the index, there is a maximum of one line in the table. This kind of index is also known as UNIQUE. If you cannot use the primary index to determine the result set because, for example, none of the primary index fields occur in the WHERE or HAVING clause, the system searches through the entire table (full table scan). For this case, you can create secondary indexes, which can restrict the number of table entries searched to form the result set.
reference : help.sap.com
thanx.

How to get SQL script for generating table, constraint, indexes?

I'd like to get from somewhere Oracle tool for generating simple SQL script for generating table, indexes, constraint (like Toad) and it has to be Oracle tool but not Designer.
Can someone give me some edvice?
Thanks!
m.

I'd like to get from somewhere Oracle tool for
generating simple SQL script for generating table,
indexes, constraint (like Toad) and it has to be
Oracle tool but not Designer.
SQL Developer is similar to Toad and is an Oracle tool.
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/sql_developer/index.html

Oracle DB Query Generating Invalid Column Index error

Dear All,
Apologies for a question on this rather basic error but I don't understand why i'm experiencing the behaviour described.
The piece of code below connects to a database, runs a query, then attempts to display the contents of the resultset. I understand from other posts on the topic that the query I am executing (INSERT INTO table VALUES (...)) as in the comments below needs to have autocommit disabled to allow me to access the resultset without the transaction closing.
public void runQuery(String query) throws Exception { Class.forName("oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver"); Connection con = DriverManager.getConnection(database, username, password); con.setAutoCommit(false); Statement st = con.createStatement(); ResultSet rs = st.executeQuery (query); // "select * from user_tables" // "INSERT INTO BH VALUES ('','2.25','Dark Red','Samsonite','4987638762')" while (rs.next()) { System.out.print (rs.getString(1)); // Exception thrown here } con.commit(); st.close(); con.close(); }
I have removed try {} catch {} error handling for clarity.
I am receiving the invalid column index error from the indicated line, which clearly suggest column 1 doesn't exist, however if i run the same query in another tool, something like the following is returned:
Rows Affected
1
The query is being received by the database as the row ends up in the table intact, so I am clearly missing something about how to access the resultset correctly.
I am guessing that I am either misusing/misunderstanding the autocommit option or that the resultset is different to what I am expecting...
Can someone please shed a little light?
Many thanks!
George

Ok, I've done a little more digging, and i've come to the conclusion that an INSERT query doesn't return a resultset (or returns an empty one)
Could someone with a little more knowledge confirm this as I've had little luck finding an explicit yes or no from the web!
Many Thanks in advance...

SQL Server 2014 Bug - with Clustered Index On Temp Table with Identity Column

Hi,
Here's a stored procedure. (It could be shorter, but this will show the problem.)
CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.SGTEST_TBD_20141030 AS
IF OBJECT_ID('TempDB..#Temp') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE #Temp
CREATE TABLE #Temp
Col1 INT NULL
,Col2 INT IDENTITY NOT NULL
,Col3 INT NOT NULL
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX ix_cl ON #Temp(Col2)
SET IDENTITY_INSERT #Temp ON;
RAISERROR('Preparing to INSERT INTO #Temp...',0,1) WITH NOWAIT;
INSERT INTO #Temp (Col1, Col2, Col3)
SELECT 1,2,3
RAISERROR('Insert Success!!!',0,1) WITH NOWAIT;
SET IDENTITY_INSERT #Temp OFF;
In SQL Server 2014, If I execute this (EXEC dbo.SGTEST_TBD_20141030) It works. If I execute it a second time - It fails hard with:
Msg 0, Level 11, State 0, Line 0
A severe error occurred on the current command. The results, if any, should be discarded.
Msg 0, Level 20, State 0, Line 0
A severe error occurred on the current command. The results, if any, should be discarded.
In SQL Server 2012, I can execute it over and over, with no problem. I've discovered two work-a-rounds:
1) Add "WITH RECOMPILE" to the SP CREATE/ALTER statement, or
2) Declare the cluster index in the TABLE CREATE statement, e.g. ",UNIQUE CLUSTERED (COL2)"
This second option only works though, if the column is unique. I've opted for the "WITH RECOMPILE" for now. But, thought I should share.

Hi,
I did not get any error Message:
CREATE TABLE #Temp
Col1 INT NULL
,Col2 INT IDENTITY NOT NULL
,Col3 INT NOT NULL
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX ix_cl ON #Temp(Col2)
SET IDENTITY_INSERT #Temp ON;
RAISERROR('Preparing to INSERT INTO #Temp...',0,1) WITH NOWAIT;
INSERT INTO #Temp (Col1, Col2, Col3)
SELECT 1,2,3
RAISERROR('Insert Success!!!',0,1) WITH NOWAIT;
SET IDENTITY_INSERT #Temp OFF;
SELECT * FROM #Temp
OUTPUT:
Col1 Col2
Col3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
Select @@version
--Microsoft SQL Server 2012 (SP1) - 11.0.3000.0 (X64)
Oct 19 2012 13:38:57
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation
Enterprise Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.1 <X64> (Build 7601: Service Pack 1)
Thanks Shiven:) If Answer is Helpful, Please Vote

What index will be created by default when new table is created

Hi Team,
1. When creating new table, what type of index wil be created in sql server ?
2. what is the table name if we create new table without primary key?
Please help me on this
Anand Rajagopal

Hi Anand,
Your Question is quite wide in range and I am agree the other answers too. I would like to talk about your second question first because it will depend upon the first one.
When we creating a fresh table without specified any primary key it is called "Heap" table. A Heap table is not containing clustered index but it can non-clustered index (but not automatically we have
to create explicitly). It means the data is not in order and we have to apply ORDER BY clause to short the data. Heap structure is not good for big tables which requires filtration frequently.
When we create a table without specifying primary key, then none of indexes created on table. but if we specify primary key then it will create a clustered index with it. It means it is now physically
shorted. But It doesn't guarantees that if you fire SELECT statement then It will fetch record in same order (It seems but it is not) because the RDBMS is based on "SET THEORY" and it doesn't guarantee the shorting order or records.
Also have a look on "Create Table", "Indexes" & "Table Scan", "Table Seek" for better understanding.
Shivendra

Button "Position" can't work in sm30 when use Table maintenance generator

Hello guys,
i have created a table and use 'Table Maintenance Generator' to generate the code. When i run sm30 and click the button 'Position', it can not work.
i enter '/h' to debug it and find the value'POSI' is not assigned to ok_code.
Some tables created before are OK. What's the matter with it?
Many Thanks

hello daniel,
there is very possibility that some inconsistency might be occured while generating table maintenance generator. So i would advice u to create ur table maintenance generator once more after deleting the current one.
Reward properly.

"Initial column cannot be generated" error when creating a planning book

Hi,
I have an error when creating a planning book with the planning book wizard. In the tab "data view", I enter values for the "Visible" and "Input" fields and validate. The following error is generated: "Initial column cannot be generated" and then "Maintain the time for the 'column visible from' field". I tried with different dates, and get the same error.
I am running SCM 5.0.
Any help would be greatly apreciated.
Regards,
Mikael.

Hi,
Generally these error come when we manually enter the value in the Visible and Input column. Instead we should try select value from the Drill down options which gets generated based on the Time Bucket Profile you have selected as input for Planning Horizon.

Table Header not Recurring - when Generate PDF from HTML with tables

Hello, It is not working as expected...and I'm not sure if the functionality is supported. Want to create PDF from html document. The html document contains a html table that typically contains a large number of rows. To make reading easier the html table used thead and tbody elements, and their children, so that when the table extends across pages when printed the header element recurs on each page. However, the header element is not recurring in the generated PDF document (it only occurs in the first row of the table). Just wondering if you have tried or used this functionality (created PDF from html with table with headers and the PDF included the table with recurring table header. And if so, did you do anything special to make it work. Thanks for any insight.

If there's a problem with that package, I suggest you speak to the developer of that package and ask them to investigate. It's not an Oracle supplied package so you are wrong to look for help here.

Column indexes when generating tables

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for