Commitment Item Categories

Hi Experts,
Can any one explain me below commitment item categories available in sap.
Category :
1 - Balance
2 - Revenues
3 - Expenditures
4 - Balances
5 - Clarification Work List  
Please differentiate between cat 1 and 4.?
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
SAM.

Hello,
commitment items are essential for the update into the Project Cash Management as the financial transaction which is maintained for the commitment items is used to identify the type of the posting (e.g. invoice, payment, etc). Further informations about the correct customizing of commitment items can be found in note 144169.
The assignment of commitment items to the value categories is similar to the assignment of cost elements or cost element groups to value categories and is needed for the proper update of the data from the Project Cash Management into the Project Information Database (table RPSCO). The Project Information Database is the basis for hierarchy reports. So in case that this customizing isn't done, values from the Project Cash Management might not be shown or might be shown incorrectly in the hierarchy reports (e.g. 31CASH, 31FIM, 31FIMA, 31FIMB).
Assigning one commitment item to all value categories can be done. It is depending how detailed your reporting should be, but from point of the reporting it won't make sense to mix for example commitment items for outgoing payments with commitment items for incoming payments.
Kind regards,
Dirk

Similar Messages

  • Assignment of Commitment items to G/L Accounts

    Hi to All,
    My name is samad farooq , currently we are have upgrade our system from version 4.6C to ECC 6.0.
    In 4.6C, we maintained assignment of G/L Accounts to Commitment Item via transaction code FS00.
    Now same has been maintained in ECC6.0 but it gives error no commitment item found for processing.
    We can maintain using the derivation strategy (FMDERIVE), but as we have upgraded, is there any way to automatically system derive the commitment without mention all the data again by using the derivation strategy.
    Thanking you all in Advance.
    Samad Farooq

    Hello,
    commitment items are essential for the update into the Project Cash Management as the financial transaction which is maintained for the commitment items is used to identify the type of the posting (e.g. invoice, payment, etc). Further informations about the correct customizing of commitment items can be found in note 144169.
    The assignment of commitment items to the value categories is similar to the assignment of cost elements or cost element groups to value categories and is needed for the proper update of the data from the Project Cash Management into the Project Information Database (table RPSCO). The Project Information Database is the basis for hierarchy reports. So in case that this customizing isn't done, values from the Project Cash Management might not be shown or might be shown incorrectly in the hierarchy reports (e.g. 31CASH, 31FIM, 31FIMA, 31FIMB).
    Assigning one commitment item to all value categories can be done. It is depending how detailed your reporting should be, but from point of the reporting it won't make sense to mix for example commitment items for outgoing payments with commitment items for incoming payments.
    Kind regards,
    Dirk

  • Commitment Item Master

    Hi
    1)What is the implication of Financial transaction in the Commitment item master?
    Kindly explain in details regarding various financial transactions like
    30  Post revenues, expenses, fixed assets, inventories
    40  Post Goods receipts and Goods issues
    50  Clearing
    60  Post receivables & Payables
    70  Post customer clearing
    80  Post bank clearing and BG
    90  Post cash holding
    Explain for which transactions and GL accounts these financial transactions must be used.
    2) What is Commitment Item caegory? When and for which transaction these item categories must be used like
    1) Balance
    2) Expenses
    3)Revenues.
    4)Clarification work list
    Cheers
    V.Krishnan
    (Your replies will be acknowledged with points)

    I've create commitment item master (FMCIA) without "Standard Variant" field flaging. When I display commitment item heirarchy (FMCIE) the commitment item is under my Standard Hierarchy.
    I reviewed in table "FMCI" and found that field Standard Variant (STVAR) is flagged "X". Is this mean all Commitment Item Master Data will be automatically flaged the Standard Variant field?
    From my experience, all Commitment Item should be flagged to be position under the standard variant. I tried create Commitment Item Master in the client that the Standard Variant indicator filed appeard by un flag that field. There is the error Message no. F6160 (You can only maintain postable cmmt items in standard var. xxx).
    Are there any case that the standard variant field in Commitment Item master should not be flagged, and let that commitment item out from Standard Variant ?
    Is this related to the configuration that I set for Year Independent Master Data?
    Ton

  • Commitment Item-Error while posting GR

    Hi MM Gurus
    I am tryin to post GR without PO for movement type 101.
    and already customized settings for Auto PO allowed for movement type 101.
    When i m tryin to save GR, it is showin me error
    " No Commitment Item Entered in item 00010 1000 379999"
    i dont knw how to solve this error..
    Error description Says, someone has activated funds management, cash budget management, or project cash management, therefore i must have to enter commitment item in all involved company code.
    so culd u pls let me knw whr exactly i have to enter this details for commitment item.
    Thanks a lot..
    Regards
    Jignesh

    Hi,
    This is due to lack of budget against the concerned item. Check the same against the commitment item as per the valuation class assigned for the item.This can be viewed in TCode FMRP_2FMB4002 .Ask your FI team for allocation of budget.
    Dhruba

  • How to swap between to sets of item categories in sales order

    Hi,
    We receive Idocs from a different system that creates sales order in the R/3 system. For some of these, we want to be able to use an alternative sourcing mode - basically switch between standard POs and 3rd Party POs. The orders has many items, and we find it impractical to manually update all items - also because the order might contain different materials with maybe 5-10 different item categories, that needs to be changed to 5-10 others. This will be very difficult for our business users, since we do not have a simple naming convention of item categories to ease this.
    So we are looking for alternative ways, where we can change all items by changing on header level.
    We have thought of these alternatives :
    1. Change distribution channel. Requires all materials and customers to be set up in 2 DCs - not realistically.
    2. Change sales order types using VOV8 alternatives. This seems not to be allowed for materials in BOMs and with E consumption. See other thread named "Can not change SO order type - disallowed by item settings" for more details.
    3. What we we really need is changes on schedule line level, and I suppose we could have a logic in MV45AFZZ change this dependent on some user field. But I don't think this will work, as other settings controlled by requirement class etc. will be inconsistent.
    Proposals for this are welcome - it should be a common issue.

    Hi,
    We ended up designing a solution where item category was swapped by shipping condition. For shipping condition 11, we simulated that a specific 'usage' was active. It required a few tricks to get the Source determination to run, and a further trick to avoid a re-pricing B to nuke the pricing conditions. This is still draft code, but it seems to work :
    Enhancement points ES_SAPFV45P / VBAP_FUELLEN_10 : Ensure ‘usage’ is set according to shipping condition
    data : ld_active type c.
    data : ld_no_pricing_vwpos type c.
    constants : lc_vwpos_no_pricing(20) type c value 'VWPOS_NO_PRICING'.
    Fake change to ensure new item cat determination
    ( conditions when this is active, setting ld_active )
      if sy-subrc is initial
      and ld_active = 'X'            "Action enabled for company
      and t180-trtyp ca 'HV'.       " Create/change mode
    case vbak-vsbed.
      when '11'. " Special logic
        t184_vwpos = 'Z001'. " Special T184 usage for direct
        clear *vbap-mandt. " simulate change of *vbap
        matnr_changed = 'X'." simulate change
        ld_no_pricing_vwpos = 'X'. " Flag for suppress B repricing
      when '12'. " standard logic
        clear t184_vwpos.  " Standard T184 usage for indirect
        clear *vbap-mandt. " simulate change of *vbap
        matnr_changed = 'X'." simulate change
        ld_no_pricing_vwpos = 'X'. " Flag for suppress B repricing
      when others.
        clear ld_no_pricing_vwpos.
      endcase.
    Memory ID read in MV45AFZB, form USEREXIT_NEW_PRICING_VBAP
      export ld_no_pricing_vwpos to memory id lc_vwpos_no_pricing.
      endif.
    MV45AFZB, form USEREXIT_SOURCE_DETERMINATION : Ensure item category determinations takes ‘usage’ into consideration
    ( conditions when this is active, setting ld_active )
      if sy-subrc is initial
      and w_active = 'X'            "Action enabled for company
      and t180-trtyp ca 'HV'.       " Create/change mode
    Get higher-level item category
      clear lv_uepos. clear  gv_spp_pstyv.
      lv_uepos = vbap-uepos.
      do 10 times. " to eliminate phantom levels
      read table xvbap with key posnr = lv_uepos.
      if sy-subrc = 0 and xvbap-pstyv ne lv_zvco.
      gv_spp_pstyv = xvbap-pstyv.
      exit.
      elseif sy-subrc eq 0 and xvbap-pstyv eq lv_zvco.
      lv_uepos = xvbap-uepos.
      elseif sy-subrc ne 0.
      exit.
      endif.
      enddo.
    t184_vwpos set in FV45PFAP_VBAP_FUELLEN
      call function 'RV_VBAP_PSTYV_DETERMINE'  "Determine using T184
             exporting
               t184_auart   = tvak-auart " Order type
               t184_mtpos   = maapv-mtpos "Item category group
               t184_uepst   = gv_spp_pstyv  "Higher level-SPP item category
               t184_vwpos   = t184_vwpos " Usage from FV45PFAP_VBAP_FUELLEN
               vbap_pstyv_i = ''
             importing
               vbap_pstyv   = vbap-pstyv.
    endif.
    MV45AFZB, form USEREXIT_NEW_PRICING_VBAP : Ensure dynamic change of item categories does not trigger repricing type B.
    data : ld_no_pricing_vwpos type c.
    constants : lc_vwpos_no_pricing(20) type c value 'VWPOS_NO_PRICING'.
    Memory ID set in FV45PFAP_VBAP_FUELLENP, FORM VBAP_FUELLEN
    import ld_no_pricing_vwpos from memory id lc_vwpos_no_pricing.
    if sy-subrc is initial
    and ld_no_pricing_vwpos = 'X'.
    Skip repricing when mass change item cat
      clear new_pricing.
    endif.
    I hope someone will find it useful. Please notice that Enhancement points was required, so it will not work in older R/3 versions.

  • Error in Posting Service Entry Sheet - FI 311 No Commitment Item in Item 1

    Dear All,
    We need a suggestion/solution for the following problem :-
    Our customer had raised purchase orders for services in may 2010. The following critical entries were made in the purchase order.
    Account Assignment Category was P-Project
    The WBS element was entered as the Accounts Assigment Category was P.
    The user was entering uncoded services. Hence the material group for that service which had G/L a/c tagged to it was entered. But the G/l code was not populated in the purchase order by the system at that time of creation of purchase order and subsequently the user was able to save and release purchase order.
    The user was able to post Service Entry Sheet and generate accounting entries in june 2010.
    Additional service entry sheets are required to be posted for the remaining quantites. The client has urcated the SES process into two parts.
    1. Through T-code ZML81N the end user is able to create and save the SES.
    2. Through T-code ML81N the Head of Department is able to approve and post the SES which results in generating of accounting entries.
    Presently the user is able to create SES with tcode ZML81N. But when the HOD tries to approve and post the ses we get the error.
    FI 311 - No commitement item maintained in Item 0001 in P220 (company code).
    Fund Management is active in this company code and all settings related to Funds Management and FI have been checked by respective consultants.
    The end user is not having any problems in processing SES for current Pos. But he is not able to create SES for the POs created in May, 2010 for which the user has already created and posted more than one SES against the same POs.
    We have already escalated it to SAP.
    Thanks in advance
    Anil Shanbhag

    Hi,
    Use T.code:FS00 and check G/L account 280000 is there in your company code or not.
    If yes, check its nature(type/description,control data , cretae bank/intererst tabs)of G/L
    NOTE: Also check and compare the field selection between Movement type 101 & your G/L account 280000 in SE38 t.code with  Program RM07CUFA
    Regards,
    Biju

  • Open Purchase order can we maintain commitment item for the year

    hi
    my requirement is for the year open purchase orders we need to maintain commitment item previously it was not maintain from this year we need to maintain is it posssible

    Hi
    If your PO has an IO or WBS or a Cost center maintained in it - Run the Program RKANBU01 in SE38 and it will push all the past data of commitments into the CO objects
    You need to activate Commitment management in OKKP as well as in IO Type... If IO was created w/o the tick ON, then I believe you dont have a choice here..
    br, Ajay M

  • Tables related to PM order for actual and commitment items

    Hello Experts,
    I need help in finding the tables related to PM order for actual and commitment items.
    I need develop a report which can show the actual and commitment items for each order and Operation/component under that each ITEM wise and its related documents.
    For the component we can find the table RESB.
    But i am getting the difficult to find the data related to Operation (services)
    In my client we can able to see PM orders with activity types and SKF
    How can build the logic to find the values for each operation item and its commitments (PO, PR) and actual that is FI documents
    Please guide me the   TABLES and fields or else give me the hints, how can find the tables
    Thanks and Regards,
    Narendra

    Hi,
    The tables are COEP (actuals) and COOI (commitments); that is if you mean the financial figures.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Reassignment of commitment items & fund centers in open PR, PO & MIGO docs

    Hi
    We  are using Fund Management (BCS) in our system since last one year. Now starting from next fiscal year ( 01.04.2009) we want to replace some of the existing fund centers and commitment items with either newly created fund centers & commitment items or existing ones. We will be changing FM derivation strategy too.
    How should one go about it? Whats should be the strategy and procedure for replacing the commitment items & fund centers in open PR, POs & other open document. I know there is option of  reassignment of fund centers and commitment items using reassignment derivation strategy. But I am not clear about the steps involved and strategy one should use while doing so.
    Pawan

    Hello Pawan,
    You can also combine reassignment with closing operations (Carryforward with reassignment)
    Pls check the link, under 'Closing Operations -> Derivation Strategy for Reassignments with Closing Operations'
    By doing so, you can carry forward for example open PO's assigned to given account assingment in 2008 to a new account assignment in 2009
    Reassignment programs RFFMCHAN and RFFMCHAT are normally used when Wrongly assigned documents or changes in the responsibility areas of the functional assignment necessitate account assignment changes within the year, or when PSM-FM is implemented later than other components.
    I hope this will help
    Kind regards
    Mar

  • GR/IR Account with Wrong Commitment Item

    Dear Experts,
    When we doing GR(MIGO), system is not deriving the commitment item from FMDerive, istead taking the commitment item from offsetting GL entry. Is it common behavior? If not, how to force GR act derived into right commitment item which its category (40/3). Please kindly advise. Thank you.

    Hi kkbdsp,
    My issue is this GR account is never derived from FMDerive. And i searched in forum, this is common behavior in SAP like Ming Hong post below :
    " What you described is a SAP standard behavior. For GR/IR account, system ignores whatever settings you made in FMDERIVE.  FM account assignment is inherited from the PO. For example your consumption PO has expense account 456 with CI 456, Fund and FC; your GR/IR account is 123 with CI 123.
    GR posting:
    DR 456 with CI 456/Fund/FC
    CR 123 with CI 456/Fund/FC
    IR posting:
    DR 123 with CI 456/Fund/FC
    CR Vendor
    Regards,
    Ming
    And my concern are :
    - I am just wondering why do we need to make CI setting for GR/IR with category 40/30?
    - if GR act is always derived from its offseting acct (expense acct 30/3), why then SAP give error message "GR reduction impossible. Wrong CI with FT 30 instead of 40 in GR/IR acct"?
    Please kindly advise. Thanks.

  • Incorrect Commitment item derived for GR/IR for service orders

    Hi Guys
    We are currently on support pack 14, release 200 of EA-PS. I'm experiencing problems in with FM account assignment derivation. Especially with regards to service entry sheets.
    The system is deriving account assignments well from goods reciepts to invoice reciept stage. The problem kicks in when clearing GR/IR - clearing using transaction code MR11. The system derives the expenditure commitment item using the GR/IR account in FI. I created assignments for my commitment items to be derived from G/L accounts as there is a one to one relationship between my G/L account and commitment item.
    This condition results in a debit and credit entry being posted to the same commitment item in one transaction. I would expect only one item to be posted to the expense commitment item as it is the only one in the two line document whose financial transaction field set to 30. The GR/IR commitment's financial field is set to 40.
    Regards
    Thuso Mudau.

    Hi,
    First thing I's do is to activate the FMDERIVE trace and see what is this commitment item derived from.
    See what GL accounts are posted in the financial doc, and have a look at the log to see if the commitment item is derived directly from those acocunts.
    Let me know the results...
    Shahaf Yaari

  • Scheduling Agreement Item not reflected as commitment item in CO

    HI SAP MM Gurus,
    Good day!
    Here is my scenario:
    We need to create scheduling agreements with Account Assignment F which needs to have the commitment items reflected upon creation of the delivery schedule. This works ok if I create the documents (Scheduling Agreement and Delivery Schedule) manually, with the field EKPO-XOBLR being set to X to have the items pass through to CO
    The problem is, due to the volume of documents processed, we need to create an upload program using the function module BAPI_SAG_CREATE. Upon observation, this does not update the commitments for the shceduling agreement items even though both the scheduling agreement and delivery schedule were created.
    Any thoughts on how I can resolve this?
    Kind regards,
    DeLo

    Are u sure the transaction code is ME33L, contracts use ME33K
    Now this is tricky.
    One way of finding the condition table used is (working backwards)...
    go to table KONH
    in the field VAKEY enter your contract<i>(10 chars as in EKKO/EKPO w/ leading zeroes or trailing spaces)</i> and contract line<i>(5 chars w/ leading zeroes).</i>
    look at KVEWE (A in my case) and KOTABNR (16 in my case) used now join the two (A<b>0</b>16 add the zero in between) now this is the condition table.
    working forward.
    if the condition table is A016
    <b>Get A016-KNUMH from A016</b>
    <b>A016-KAPPL = 'M'
    A016-KSCHL = 'PB00' (condition you are looking for)
    A016-EVRTN = <u>Your Contract Number</u>
    A016-EVRTP = <u>Your Contract Line Number</u></b>
    Select DATAB <i>(Validity Start Date)</i>, DATBI <i>(Validity End Date)</i> from KONH
    where KNUMH EQ A016-KNUMH
    Cheers!
    Rishi

  • Error while creating PO - No Commitment item

    Could anyone please help me resolve the below problem
    When I try to create a PO, by keying 'A' in the Account Assignment category, I get an error saying
    'No Commitment item entered in item 00 10'
    How do I remove the default setting if any in the Funds mgt, to be able to create the PO.
    Thanks
    Krishna

    Thanks Eli for the response.. Its not production.. But when I try to click 'Activate Global Funds Mgt Functions'
    I get the below message 'Aktivierung des Haushaltsmanagements ist
    erlaubt'
    and it goes to the easy acess menu.....
    So dont knwo what to do..
    Thanks
    Krishna

  • Commitment Item Error in MB1C

    Dear Guru,
    I am getting error while I am doing initial upload via MB1C.
    Error is:
    No commitment item entered in item 00000 1000 399999
    Please help,
    Swapnil

    The posted document contains at least one company code in which Funds Management, Cash Budget Management, or Project Cash Management is active. Therefore you must enter a commitment item in all involved company codes.
    Procedure
         Enter a commitment item.
         If you cannot enter a commitment item, check with your system administrator that your account assignment derivation is adjusted so that the system can automatically derive a commitment item from another  account assignment, or from the G/L or cost element.
    If you are practicing in the IDES system and dont have an idea about this commitment item ,
    you can go to OKKP & deactivate commitment management there in activate components.

  • Commitment Item error in Stock transport order

    Hi all
    I have a stock transport order (STO) for a material non valuated in both sending and receiving plants.
    While creation , there is an error with respect to completion of an "committment item" *.
    If I input  the committment item in  STO create transaction in R3 , the STO is  saved  (permitting blank account assignment for the STO item  as intended)  and there is no further issue till post goods issue in sending plant or GR in receiving plant.
    The problem is however that this STO is triggered from APO and transferred via CIF to R3 while there is no chance to input the commitment item. This results into a CIF error with the STO not created  in both R3 and APO.
    Is there a way I could bypass this "committment stuff" in this situation?
    Thanks in advance
    Anton
    *The exact error message is as follows;
    "  No commitment item entered in item 00001 plant < >
       Message no. FI311
    Diagnosis
    The posted document contains at least one company code in which Funds Management, Cash Budget Management, or Project Cash Management is active. Therefore you must enter a commitment item in all involved company codes.
    Procedure
    Enter a commitment item.
    If you cannot enter a commitment item, check with your system administrator that your account assignment derivation is adjusted so that the system can automatically derive a commitment item from another account assignment, or from the G/L or cost element.   "

    Hi,
    Did you try using derivation rule using FMDERIVE in case funds management is active.
    Please also refer to the link below which guides on the item category to be assigned in Commitment item.
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/f0/ca5716260211d28a430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
    Regards
    K.R

Maybe you are looking for

  • Ipod playlists to itunes playlists or CD

    I recently changed computers and so my new itunes doesn't have all the playlists that my ipod has - does anyone know how i can transfer my ipod playlists back to itunes playlists or CDs? lostsoul

  • Page Protection in Main window of smartform using Folder issue

    Hi Experts, We can fix the page protection issue of records in main window by checking the No Page Break check box at the line type level in a smartform. I tried to solve this issue by using the folder option. I created a folder inside the table of a

  • Simple and efficient email email set up. Can it be done?

    Ok I have read thru the Recent Mode and Gmail cc'ng issues threads. Found some work-around solutions but nothing really efficient. Both my MBP (POP to Mail client) and iPhone are online most of the time and downloading from my Gmail with POP. These a

  • SAP Master data migration tools

    Hi, I would like to know if any SAP standard tools which are available for all master data migration,Kindly share the same which is required for us now. We have to migrate the data from legacy systems to SAP and we have to use only SAP Standard maste

  • 2 Accounts

    I have 2 accounts. I have videos on the second account and want to add them to my iphone. When I plug into that and try to load those videos is says I can only sync to one account and says that it can only sync to one account and will erase what i ha