GR/IR Account with Wrong Commitment Item

Dear Experts,
When we doing GR(MIGO), system is not deriving the commitment item from FMDerive, istead taking the commitment item from offsetting GL entry. Is it common behavior? If not, how to force GR act derived into right commitment item which its category (40/3). Please kindly advise. Thank you.

Hi kkbdsp,
My issue is this GR account is never derived from FMDerive. And i searched in forum, this is common behavior in SAP like Ming Hong post below :
" What you described is a SAP standard behavior. For GR/IR account, system ignores whatever settings you made in FMDERIVE.  FM account assignment is inherited from the PO. For example your consumption PO has expense account 456 with CI 456, Fund and FC; your GR/IR account is 123 with CI 123.
GR posting:
DR 456 with CI 456/Fund/FC
CR 123 with CI 456/Fund/FC
IR posting:
DR 123 with CI 456/Fund/FC
CR Vendor
Regards,
Ming
And my concern are :
- I am just wondering why do we need to make CI setting for GR/IR with category 40/30?
- if GR act is always derived from its offseting acct (expense acct 30/3), why then SAP give error message "GR reduction impossible. Wrong CI with FT 30 instead of 40 in GR/IR acct"?
Please kindly advise. Thanks.

Similar Messages

  • Derivation of wrong commitment item in ML81N

    Dear all,
    A material document is created in ML81N with expenses a/c Dr. & provision for expenses a/c Cr & the budget is cosumed with debit of the expenses.& also Cr of this provision for expenses.Because the system defaulting the committment item of the expenses which is different from the commitment item attached to the provision for expenses G/L.
    I have enhanced  the  derivation rule in FMDERIVE with checking the business transaction,G/L & commitment item.Then switch on Trace. Then while saving/posting/checking transaction i can see business transaction and other details also.
    Even then the same problem is exist.
    Now can any one advice me how to proceed further.
    Thanks
    Shivaji

    Hi Shivaji,
    Please check the following hints:
    1) First of all, we need to be sure that all existent correction notes are implemented in your system. Please check if the following notes are applied in your system (including manual steps):
    1289547 FM account assignment incorrect in GR/IR clearing in service
    1450965 FM account assignment incorrectly inherited from PO
    1480503 FM account assignment for GL line overwritten in MIRO
    1502874 Planned Delivery Costs are not updated during GR/IR postings
    These notes correct wrong behaviours in include LFMCOBLF06 related to account assignment.
    If the notes are not there (and valid to your release/package), please apply all in one test system and retest your issue.
    2) Regarding inheriting the FM assignments, material po's can retrieve the FM account assignments from the FM tables.  This insures that the current FM account assigments are always used.
    However, in the case of Services, it is not possible to use the FM tables as it is not guaranteed that the correct Account assigment will be retrieved.  So, the SES table ESKN is used instead. The ESKN record is created at the time the SES is created.
    So, the Invoice should inherit from the GR.  But, it is not possible to read the FM tables to get the account assignment.
    3) Talking about your derivation rules (i believe you checked this already), please enter in the derivation rule -> Definition Tab, double click in the name of your Target Field (bottom part of the screen).
    There you will find the fields:
    ( ) Do not overwrite if Fld Already Filled
    ( ) Overwrite with new value
    ( ) Overwrite with new value if new value is not empty.
    I believe you should have marked the first option due to your business requirements described in this thread.
    4) I believe you have set your derivation rule to derive commitment item with the function module  FMDT_READ_MD_ACCOUNT_COMPANY  "Read Account Master Data". For additional information, check note
    839488.
    5) You can also add Conditions to your Derivation step regarding commitment item to not perform the step when (VORGN = 'RMWE' AND KTOSL = 'WRX') OR (VORGN = 'RMRP' AND KTOSL = 'WRX').  To simplify the maintenance of this condition, the Temporary flag could be used instead.  You can set this flag in a previous step using the attributes above and then use that in the Condition list.
    I hope this helps. If nothing helped, let me know the content of table FM01X in your system and your current release/package.
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa.

  • Tried accessing administrator account with wrong password

    I forgot my administrator access password,tried with a wrong password to many times and now the computer can't access account.I understand this to be a safety mechanism.How can I get myself out of this? Any assistance would be greatly appreciated!

    The above linked article is for the administrator to change other users' passwords from the administrator account. That won't help you when you have forgotten the administrator's password.
    Here is how to change the administrators password. These instructions come from Mac Help, available from the Help menu in the Finder.
    To reset the administrator password using the Mac OS X disc:
    1. Insert the Mac OS X Install disc and restart the computer.
    2. When you hear the startup tone, hold down the C key until you see the spinning gear.
    3. When the Installer appears, choose Utilities > Reset Password.
    4. Follow the onscreen instructions to change the password.
    5. Quit the Installer and restart your computer while holding down the mouse button to eject the disc.

  • PR with FM Commitment Item not to reverse during PO with Inventory G/L

    Hi,
    I am facing a problem with FM Budget during Procurement.
    We have create Purchase Requisition with Expense G/L, Cost Center and Activity (I/O) (to hit FM Budget).
    During PO, we change Expense G/L with Inventory G/L (by removing 'f' from Acct Assignment Cat). Once we save PO, then the Expense Budget that was reduced at the time of Purchase Requisition is reversed.
    Can anybody let me know how this reverse posting at the time of PO can be stopped in this scenerio.
    We want that if we removed the PR expense G/L at the time of PO and replace the same by Inventory G/L, then the budget that was reduced at Purchase Requisition should not be reversed.
    With Regards
    Rahkes

    Thanks for your quick reply.
    We have implement Budget on Cost Element and Cost Center through Fund Management at Procurement Level (it means that if budget amount is exusted then there will be no procurement)
    Here I am giving an example:
    For Material PO, we have created Purchase Requision with Budget Cost Element and Cost Center (to hit budget).
    Once the PR is save, Budget is impacted.
    Now we create Material PO with the above PR reference by deleting 'f' from Accont Assignment Category which deletes Cost Element and Cost Center from Account Assignment.  Once we save PO then the system reverse the budget amount on Cost Element and Cost Center which was impacted at the time of PR.
    We want that at the time of PO, the Budget amount should not be reversed.
    Regards
    Rahkes

  • Deleted items reappear on mobile account with syncing?

    On a mobile account with syncing, deleted items will reappear after syncing. One can manually do a full sync. Then delete stuff. Then do a full manual sync again and the deleted items are back.
    This is on Leopard 10.5.6 client and Leopard 10.5.6 server.
    Open to ideas one what I ought to look at.
    Best Wishes,
    Paul

    Paul,
    I'm happy I'm not alone (sorry..)
    I have exactly the same problem, although I'm using Linux server, not OSX.
    It all worked nicely until 10.5.6 upgrade, after that I'm having lots of home sync problems, including:
    1. locally deleted items re-appear after sync
    2. a lot of sync conflicts, specially when sync cannot resolve latest file or directory version between mobile and network copy (and mobile copy will be always the latest one)
    3. huge syncs even if no data has been modified, ie:
    I'm syncing all on login and logout, background sync is disabled.
    I do login then straight away logout, so practically no data has been modified, but the sync may show me tens of GB being transferred.
    Now, this is weird: I've done tests on a freshly created mobile account, with approx 50MB of data. Basically I've logged in and out repeatedly, sometimes modifying small files. Some of the syncs showed me transfer of 60MB!!! That's 10MB more than the size of the home directory!
    I've looked through release notes for 10.5.6 and some sync issues were 'fixed'. I'm wondering if other ones were introduced...
    As I've said, it all worked perfectly until the latest update - I have many machines behaving in the same, bad way.
    Perhaps someone has a solution?
    Thanks,
    Pawel

  • Commitment item

    Hello,
    Wrong commitment item populated for a material in the Purchase Order......Not able to change in the PO as it auto populates.....Could you tell me what connects the material to commitment item?

    Hi Ajay ,
    The message is related to Budget and cost element.It seems there is no required funds allocation against the cost element used in the service entry.Please check the same with the CO .
    DBehera

  • Commitment Item in GR

    Hi All,
    While doing the GR, we are getting the error message as:
    No Commitment item entered in item 0002 NFCL 10013
    But the GL has been created as a Commitment item.
    All other line items are getting posted to this account 10013 except this particular line item in the PO.
    What cud be the missing link?? Kindly advise
    Thanx
    Shivaji

    Hi Shivaji,
    You should first be sure that your issue is not related to an incorrect derivation rule.
    To be sure, you can activate the trace according to the instructions in consulting note
    666322.
    For this do the following:
    a. Enter in FMDERIVE and activate the Trace
    b. Test again your issue starting to create the GR again. (create a new example).
    c. You will receive FMDERIVE trace screen with the values of account assignments, including commitment item. Probably you will receive more than one time this screen. If you see that the value is correct go to the next step clicking on button "X".
    Whenever you find that the value is incorrect, please do the following:
    d. In the FMDERIVE pop-up screen click on button "Display Log". When you click there you will see another screen.
    e. There, Go to Menu Goto -> Display Print Template
    f. Click on both folders to open the tree.
    In the first one you will see the Values after and Before.
    In the second one (Steps), you are able to see WHERE exactly was the change, what was happening during the execution of derivation rules, the RULES that it is in use in that step.
    All the derivation rules which are in use during the process will be marked with yellow line.
    If you check the trace log and the 'value after' is not correct, you should adjust your existing  derivation rule.
    Please let me know the results of the trace and your comments.
    Check in addition the following notes:
    Number     Short text
    ======================
    1267998    FI311 - Common issues related to this error messag
    1268001    FI313 - No funds center entered/derived in item &.
    I hope it helps you. If not, please let me know your current EA-PS package and I will research for code correction notes.
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa.
    Edited by: Vanessa Barth on Mar 26, 2009 11:31 AM
    Edited by: Vanessa Barth on Mar 26, 2009 11:32 AM
    Edited by: Vanessa Barth on Mar 26, 2009 11:32 AM

  • Reverse incorrectly posted entries to commitment item - FM Module

    Hello,
    We had defined an incorrect commitment item in the G/L master and posted some documents for that G/L code which affected the FM module.
    After realizing the mistake, we changed the G/L master for that G/L code to update the correct commitment item but by that time quite a few entries had been posted to the wrong commitment item in the FM module.
    So we have a discrepancy in the FM module currently.
    Is there any way to reverse the wrong entries within the FM module and re-post to the correct commitment item - without reversing the G/L entries?
    Greatly appreciate your assistance.
    Best Regards,
    Vijay M.
    Edited by: Vijay M on May 12, 2009 10:58 AM

    Hi Naveen,
    check the following tables
    1. FMIFIHD - FM Header table in Fund management
    2. FMIFIIT - FM Line item Table in Fund management
    3. FMIT - Totals table for fund management
    4. FMIA- Actual Line item table for Fund management
    For the second point, i think you need to reverse the origin document and repost it with correct amount. There is no other option.
    BR
    Amitash

  • Commitment Item not found in budgeting tables

    We are trying to create a special report for our client,whenever we try
    to insert the budget data we cannot match some fields included in
    diferent tables. We have found fields:"VERSION"(VERSN),"AMOUNT"(VAL0)
    but we cannot match this fields with the Commitment Item (FIPEX) field.
    We have searched in a lot of tables for example FMIT,FMIOI,FMBL....We really don't know where to look, we are a bit desperate.
    Thanks in advance for your help.

    Hi,
    you can assign the G/L account with the valuation class through transaction obyc.
    or you can assign the G/L to commitment item through transaction FMDERIVE.
    REGARDS
    JASH

  • G/L Accoutn and Commitment Item Relation

    Hi Experts,
    I have a question about relation of G/L Account and Commitment Item.
    Is it possible that one G/L account have relation with several Commitment Item? (1:N relation)
    If I don't use derivaiton rule or G/L master data, Can I input the Commitment item manually?
    Please clarify !
    Rgds
    KyungIn

    Hi,
    1. No. The opposite is possible, i.e. one commitment item is derived from several G/Ls. If you want to derive different commitment items from one G/L, obviously, additional condition should be put in place.
    2. Yes, if you don't provide any rule for the derivation of commitment item, you'll be able to enter it manually, but be aware that for some postings 'behind the curtains' you won't have the option to provide this data.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Balance carryforward is not correct due to incorrect GL created with wrong

    Hi team,
    We have created two gl accounts with wrong account group which is balance sheet and also made an postings to that gl account after year end process done so correcting this issue, now we have transferred that amount to new gl account which is p&l account and also we have executed FAGLGVTR (carry forward trasaction)but the amount is not reflecting in retained earning account so pls let me know solution for this issue.
    Thanks
    SAP

    Dear Seshu,
    You can Transfer the Retained earnings account balance to a new GL account for Retained earnings. And mark the previous account for mark for deletion / not to use and hence no postings will be allowed in the future to that GL account. And now you can carryforward normally in the future years use.
    Regards,
    Shankar K B.

  • Documents has been posted with out line item

    Hi,
    Actully my user created GL Account with out line item he posted transactions into documents
    Now we are not able to see the documents
    T-CODE:FS10N
    GL Account
    Company code
    Fiscal year
    when ever click on amount not able to see the documents.
    Please give me guide lines to solve this issue.
    Thanks&Regards,
    Prabhakar

    Hi,
    For secenario 2, you have to put below validation to achieve your requirement.
    Cumulative add quantities of all the entries which are having status 'E' - GR for the combination of PO number and line item number.
    Ex: PO no: xyz & two  line items 01 and 02
    In the EKBE table selection screen, give PO number and line item number. Then system will display all histery for that PO line item.
    then collect all the entries which are having status 'E'. Now, we have only all GR entries ( 101 & 102)
    Add quantities of all the entris which are having movemnt type 101 and 102 separately.
    Substract sum with movement type1 from the sum wiyh movement ment type 102.
    If result is zero, that means no GR posted. Total PO quantity open.
    Then this case only, system should allow for chnages.
    Regards
    KRK

  • Commitment item does not update during PO change

    hello All,
    when we change PO " GL account " the old commitment item remains without changes.
    your help is appreciated,
    I.Gad

    Hi,
    Please, consult note 658163 - Acct assignmnt change: Determinatn of new FM acct assignmnt
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Commitment item group not displayed as level node when generate report FM

    Hi all,
    We created commitment item group or funds centre group through tcode i.e FM_SETS_FIPEX1. We create group with lower node such as hierarchy.
    However when we generate the standard report with the commitment item group or funds centre group, we find no hierarchies as commitment item/funds centre group figure. Just flat, no hierarchies, no level node.
    How to make it displayed as commitment item/fundcentre group ?
    It maintained on drilldown report or something else?
    Dewi

    Dewi,
    For report painter reports you can create groups using transaction FMRP_CI_SET_HIER - Create Group Hierarchy from Master Data Hierarchy or create sets using GS01, with them you can view the reports with the master data hierarchy.
    Regards
    César

  • Commitment item - Grant Management

    Hi,
    my customer wants to activate Grants Management. Funds Management is already active.
    The first task of project is a review of commitment item because actually few commitment item are used.
    I have to split one commitment item in more commitment item.
    Do you know how I can migrate old document with one commitment item in one with more commitment item when I active Grants Management
    Thanks
    Regards

    Hi,
    You should either define a strategy (FMYC), defining which FM address should be transformed to a new one and execute mass selection of documents (FMCG) and then reassign (FMCT). Or you can do it for particular documents with all consecutive documents via FMCB and then reassign (FMCT).
    Regards,
    Eli

Maybe you are looking for