Commitment Items for Multiple services in Service PO

Hi,
We have created a service master for all the services used in a project. FM is activated. Every service has 1:1 relation with commitment items.
Even after table look up & derivation, system was not picking up correct commitment item in service PO. We have used some exits & BADI's, Now system checks picks the correct commitment item stored in FMDERIVE against the service master.
The issue is, the moment I have multiple service masters in a single service PO with two separate comm. Item.  System picks up the commitment item of only for line item 0010 & posts both the entries against one comm. item.
Let me know how system can pick up individual commt items.
Thanks & Regards,
Ajay

Hi Ajay,
I believe that there is one standard solution for what you developed. Let me explain better.
Please check your table FM01X. You can enable one these flags in table FM01X, depending on your business needs:
FLG_PO_PROTECT if you want to always inherit the fm account assignment from the reference PO and therefore skip FMDERIVE
FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE if you always want to force a call to fmderive in all cases
FLG_SES_OVERWRITE in services, if you wish to overwrite the account assignment from the SES with the derived values from FMDERIVE.
You can find more information in note 1146677 and 923672. Please review the information of the notes and run the programs
according your needs.
FMDERIVE is skipped for GR/IR lines and the Commitment item is inherited from the PO regardless of whether or not the GR/IR line is FM relevant. This is SAP standard behavior.
If you want to force the Commitment item to be derived from the GL account for the GR/IR line, you can use the FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE flag as described in note 923672.  This will allow FMDERIVE to be called for these lines.  Please be sure to fully test this to ensure that FM account assignments that you do not want to be overwritten are
not incorrectly derived.
Bear in mind that for PO´s that does not have account assignment you should run FMCN/FMCT + FMN4N. For this you would need to check the flags and which one is more related to your needs. With the appropriate flag marked in FM01X (active with X) you should be able to run the transactions without any issue.
Based on note 189761, after doing all the previous suggestions and the issue does not appear anymore, I suggest you to run the programs described in the note.
I believe that this will help you.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

Similar Messages

  • Percentage wise Confirmation for Multiple Service line items

    Hi,
    Percentage wise Confirmation for Multiple Service line items    
    During doing service entry sheet am able to do % wise confirmaion from
    Menu -> Entry Sheet -> Create -> With Planned Service -> Enter Percent.
    But this works only for single line item the first line.
    If we have multiple line items & if i give 10%, It calculates 10% for
    all items.
    We want Line wise % confirmation can be given as % confirmation will differ from
    line to line.
    Thanks
    Shashank

    Dear ,
    This percentage is a header data i.e applicable for all service items
    F1 help clearly says
    Percentage quantity to be adopted
    Use
        If you wish to adopt the planned services from the purchase order, you
        can enter an additional percentage in this field in order to have that
        percentage adopted instead of the total quantity shown in the purchase
        order.
    Example:
        Quantity specified.............Quantity to be adopted:.............Quantity specified "
        in purchase order:....................... 10 %..................................entry sheet:
        Service  1.......100 pc ................................................................10 pc
        Service  2.......200 m  ...............................................................    20 m
        Service  3. .....30 h   .................................................................   3 h
    Edited by: redriver on Jan 22, 2012 6:50 AM

  • Commitment Item for Balance Sheet accounts

    Hi all,
    Can someone clearly explain the need to create commitment items for balance sheet accounts? I have searched a lot and have not found a satisfactory explanation. Since balance sheet accts are typically not budgeted, why do they even have to be reflected in FM?
    Please explain.
    Thanks,
    MJ

    Hi,
    Sometimes, there is a need in budget check, through posting on balance sheet accounts, e.g. stocks, assets, etc. However, in most other cases it's indeed not necessary and the commitment item given should be either dummy one or in special cases, GR/IR, banks, etc., defined specifically for the issue in question.
    Keep in mind, that once FM is activated every relevant posting must have FM assignment, including those on balance sheet accounts. That's why, even if you don't want to manage the budget, you have to assign FM objects to these postings.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Budgetory Commitment Items for Recon. accounts

    Hi Experts,
    I have a requirement of budgeting trade creditors in SAP. Currently in our legacy system we are budgeting trade creditors as well as expenses.
    Now as per SAP point of view my understanding is that we can only budget expense and revenue items. But for recon. accounts like vendor and customer, budgeting is not possible in SAP. I tried creating a commitment item for vendor recon. account with financial transaction 30 and commitment item category 3 and the same was assigned to recon. account in FS00. I posted budget in this commitment item with reference to fund and fund center through FMBB(T.code). Budget category "payment" was used for posting this budget and budget was successfully posted. Now when i tried to post the invoice to vendor, the system asks me to enter fund and fund center in vendor line item as well. i provided the fund and fund center in vendor line item to which i posted budget earlier in FMBB. the document gets posted without any error but when i view the budget consumption report instead of deducting invoice amount from the  consumable budget amount and show the net available budget system add this in the consumable budget and shows the net result as bellow:
    can any one guide if budgeting of such item is possible in sap FM or can we just budget P/L items? need your guidance please.

    Hi,
    Payments made to a vendor can be tracked through FI/FI-CA modules.
    As for PSM-FM, please, comprehend and explain to your client two important points:
    a) You won't be able to budget a vendor separately, but only, and still hypothetically, through reconciliation account, which makes the whole thing meaningless, as there will be no control on specific vendor
    b) You won't stop payment, from business perspective, to a vendor on duly registered invoice just because 'the budget was exceeded'
    If your client is interested to follow the payments, he can 'budget' bank accounts. Again, this does not make any sense (at least, a blocking budgeting), because the control is already applied through treasury components and bank account balance itself. Still, technically, it could be done.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Funds Management - Commitment items for all GLs

    Hello -
    When we activate Funds Management, System expects a commitment item for every GL, including Bank accounts and Inventory accounts. I want system to expect commitment item only for expense accounts. How can I Do it. As such, we donu2019t have a budget for bank accounts.
    Thanks in advance.
    Chris
    Edited by: Chris Farr on Nov 24, 2008 12:14 PM

    Just read Eli's  msg clearly, its mentioned that GLs have to be assigned to Commitment with right category and Fin transacton. Just explored the IDES FM areas 1000,3000 and 4000 and understood the following but with couple of questions ( mentioned below)
    Expenditure     30/3     
    Asset exp                     30/3     
    GR/IR - Clearing     40/3     
    Misc clearing      40/3     
    Liquid funds / Bank a/cs     90/1     
    All other bank chk pable/ Recbles     80/3     
    Trade recble     60/2     it make sense, but in FM area 3000, Receivables defined as 30/3 ?
    Trade payable     60/3     it make sense, but in FM area 3000, Receivables defined as 30/3 ?
    Tax payable     30/2     Why category '2' here?
    Input tax                     30/2     Why category '2' here?
    WOULD APPRECIATE IF SOMEBODY CAN CLARIFY MY QUESTIONS ABOVE.
    Hope this info is useful and not mis guiding
    Thanks
    Chris

  • Updation of FOC item for multiple customers at a time

    Freinds,
    I have an issue regarding Free Goods item updation using T code - VBN1.  Normally we are updating an FOC item with the main line item along with quantity(exclusive or inclusive) for a particular period. The same process will repeat for each customer code using the T code.  My question is, whether there is any option to update the same set of FOC item for multiple set of customers at a time, instead of entering one by one for each customers.  Please help me out in this.  Thanks.

    If this is going to be a regular exercise, then you need to consider to add one more combination of Customer / Material based on which, you can create LSMW and make use of it regularly.  This is straight and simple approach to achieve the desired result.  On the other hand, if you dont want to touch your existing configuration, then you have to copy the standard program SAPMV13N, create a BDC, add input parameters as you wish and upload.
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Some Commitment item for one GL account

    Dear experts!
    Now, I'm getting some issue about Funds management.
    - The first, my company have three department and the each of department have a budget. The detail, Department A have budget is 50M, Department B have budget is 40M and department C have budget is 60M. Therefore, I have create three commitment item corresponding  to three departments and three budget. In date 20.01.2014 my company have to buy material A for three department (A, B, C).
    - Second, my company create a PR for three department (ABC) with three line item in t.code ME51. Here, can I assign three commitment item to corresponding to three line item? if i can do it then do the system check budget in the case? After that if the PR pass, then I create PO from PR and can I assign three commitment for three line item? In the PO, if I don't assign commitment item for three line Item then in the step of Good Receipt, how do the system process the problem?
    Help me to process the issue!
    Best regards, Huy

    Hi,
    Commitment item, in reasonable master data management system, should not represent departments: you have fund centres for this. Commitment items in 95% of the cases will map your chart of accounts (G/L). Derivation of fund centre department could be done through other financial/logistic objects, as cost centres, profit centres, plants, etc.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • BAPI_PO_CREATE1 for Multiple service line items

    Hi Exports,
    I am using BAPI_PO_CREATE1 to create service PO. I am facing problem when each line item(ebelp) has multiple service line items. I am unable to map multiple service line items to a single line item (ebelp) properly.
    Can anyone help.
    Regards,
    Kiran

    Hi ,
    I am able to create service PO when only one service line item is there.
    If multiple service line items are there. then i have to put the below code with in the loop.
    here i am facing the probelm.
            w_poservices-pckg_no    = g_pckg.
            w_poservices-line_no    = g_pckg.
            w_poservices-outl_ind   = c_x.
            w_poservices-subpckg_no = g_pckg + 1.
            w_poservices-service    = w_sdata-srvpos.
         w_poservices-short_text = w_idata-ktext1.
         w_poservices-quantity   = w_idata-menge.
         w_poservices-base_uom   = w_idata-meins.
         w_poservices-gr_price   = w_idata-tbtwr.
         w_poservices-matl_group = w_idata-matkl.
            APPEND w_poservices TO i_poservices.
            CLEAR: w_poservices.
            w_poservices-pckg_no    = g_pckg + 1.
            w_poservices-line_no    = g_pckg + 1.
            w_poservices-ext_line   = 0000000010.
            w_poservices-outl_ind   = c_x.
         w_poservices-subpckg_no = g_pckg + 2.
            w_poservices-service    = w_sdata-srvpos.
            w_poservices-short_text = w_sdata-ktext1.
            w_poservices-quantity   = w_sdata-menge.
            w_poservices-base_uom   = w_sdata-meins.
            w_poservices-gr_price   = w_sdata-tbtwr.
            w_poservices-matl_group = w_idata-matkl.
            APPEND w_poservices TO i_poservices.
            CLEAR: w_poservices.
            w_posrvaccessvalues-pckg_no    = g_pckg + 1.
            w_posrvaccessvalues-line_no    = g_pckg + 1.
            w_posrvaccessvalues-serno_line = 01.
            w_posrvaccessvalues-serial_no  = 01.
            w_posrvaccessvalues-quantity   = w_idata-menge.
            APPEND w_posrvaccessvalues TO i_posrvaccessvalues.
    thank you.
    Regards,
    Kiran

  • PO With respect to realse order with Multiple Item and Multiple Services

    Dear Guru,
    I am having Issues with BAPI_PO_CREATE1 which i am not able to resolve.
    I am Trying to create a PO with Multiple Line (such as line item 10, 20, 30, 40 )
    and Each line item should contain multiple services in its service line item (such as 10, 20 30, 40)
    The Import parameters i have defined for
    POHEADER is as below: 
    COMP_CODE                      1000
    DOC_TYPE                       RO
    CREATED_BY                     SAIFUR
    PURCH_ORG                      1000
    PUR_GROUP                      102
    CURRENCY                       INR
    DOC_DATE                       05.12.2009
    AGREEMENT                      4700014635
    The Import parameters i have defined for
    POHEADERX is as below:
    COMP_CODE                      X
    DOC_TYPE                       X
    CREATED_BY                     X
    PURCH_ORG                      X
    PUR_GROUP                      X
    CURRENCY                       X
    DOC_DATE                       X
    AGREEMENT                      X
    The Table Parameter I have Defiend For 1st line item
    in POITEM is as below :
    PO_ITEM                        00010
    SHORT_TEXT                     HIRING OF COMPUTER / LAPTOP
    PLANT                          078
    TRACKINGNO                     ITEM1
    QUANTITY                                  1.000
    ITEM_CAT                       9
    ACCTASSCAT                     U
    AGREEMENT                      4700014635
    AGMT_ITEM                      00010
    PREQ_NAME                      127562_B
    PERIOD_IND_EXPIRATION_DATE     D
    PCKG_NO                        0000000001
    The Table Parameter I have Defiend For 2nd line item
    in POITEM is as below :
    PO_ITEM                        00020
    SHORT_TEXT                     HIRING OF LCD
    PLANT                          078
    TRACKINGNO                     ITEM2
    QUANTITY                                  1.000
    ITEM_CAT                       9
    ACCTASSCAT                     U
    AGREEMENT                      4700014635
    AGMT_ITEM                      00020
    PREQ_NAME                      127562_B
    PERIOD_IND_EXPIRATION_DATE     D
    PCKG_NO                        0000000000

    The Table Parameter I have Defiend For 1st line item
    in POSCHEDULE is as below :
    PO_ITEM                        00010
    SCHED_LINE                     0001
    DEL_DATCAT_EXT                 D
    DELIVERY_DATE                  05.12.2009
    QUANTITY                                  1.000
    The Table Parameter I have Defiend For 2nd line item
    in POSCHEDULE is as below :
    PO_ITEM                        00020
    SCHED_LINE                     0002
    DEL_DATCAT_EXT                 D
    DELIVERY_DATE                  05.12.2009
    QUANTITY                                  1.000
    The Table Parameter I have Defiend For 1st line item
    in POSCHEDULEX is as below :
    PO_ITEM                        00010
    SCHED_LINE                     0001
    DEL_DATCAT_EXT                 X
    DELIVERY_DATE                  X
    QUANTITY                       X
    The Table Parameter I have Defiend For 2nd line item
    in POSCHEDULEX is as below :
    PO_ITEM                        00020
    SCHED_LINE                     0002
    DEL_DATCAT_EXT                 X
    DELIVERY_DATE                  X
    QUANTITY                       X
    The Table Parameter I have Defiend For 1st and 2nd line item
    in POSERVICES is as below :
    PCKG_NO     LINE_NO     EXT_LINE     SUBPCKG_NO     QUANTITY     BAS     GR_PRICE     SHORT_TEXT
    1     1     0     2     0          0     HIRING OF COMPUTER / LAPTOP
    2     2     10     0     1     EA     700     PENTIUM COM WITH COL MON & NETWORK COM
    2     3     20     0     1     EA     350     INKJET PRINTER(BLACK&WHITE AND COLOUR)
    2     4     30     0     1     EA     325     SCANNER COLOUR
    5     5     0     5     0          0     HIRING OF LCD
    5     6     10     0     1     HR     400     LCD HIRING PER HOUR
    5     7     20     0     2     HR     200     FOR EVERY ADDITIONAL HOUR

  • Open Purchase order can we maintain commitment item for the year

    hi
    my requirement is for the year open purchase orders we need to maintain commitment item previously it was not maintain from this year we need to maintain is it posssible

    Hi
    If your PO has an IO or WBS or a Cost center maintained in it - Run the Program RKANBU01 in SE38 and it will push all the past data of commitments into the CO objects
    You need to activate Commitment management in OKKP as well as in IO Type... If IO was created w/o the tick ON, then I believe you dont have a choice here..
    br, Ajay M

  • How to Change financial trasnactin for commitment item for which no trasnaction has been posted

    Hi ,
    1.
    \We re in process to Go live for he FUND Management module for Power generation business, while we create all  FM master data and budget structure we found a mistake in NONBUDGET commitment items. we wrongly mapped financial transaction 30, while changing it to 40 system showing following massage,
    Field "Fin.transaction" cannot be changed
        Message no. F6288
    Diagnosis
        You can no longer change the entry in field Fin.transaction as commitment
        item NONBUDGET in FM area SAPL and fiscal year  has already been defined
        as a budget object.
    System Response
        Field Fin.transaction is not changed.
    2. when we try to delete the commitment item system showing following error
    Commitment item NONBUDGET in FM area  and Fyear SAPL defined as a budget
    object
        Message no. F6206
    Diagnosis
        The commitment item NONBUDGET in the FM area SAPL and fiscal year  was
        defined as a budget object.
    System Response
        The chosen action was not executed.
    Procedure
        Remove the indentification Budget object in the budget structure.
    As per above error we check the following details
    1. FM deriver - Removed NONBUDGET from all the rule
    2. There is no Budget/ Posting in FM9k
    3. There is no activation of budget ( no golive)
    4 There is no data posted with the commitment Items

    Hi Jeetendra
    Try deleting the budget structure using FMBSBO_DEL.
    Thanks
    Shyam

  • Commitment item for component check in MIGO

    Hi All,
    FM implemented. While doing Gi for the prod order and while checking for the component item ok.
    I am facing the error No committment item entered in item 00000.
    Please help how to do Gi.

    Hi,
    try entering commitment item in GL account.
    Paolo

  • Ksb2 transaction ( Display commitment item for CC )authorisation issue

    In my project some of the user are facing problem to display for the T code KSb2 ( Commitment Item report for cost center ).
    Mesage : No authorisation to display valuation view 1 for controlling Area .
    User has in her authorisation profile to display valuation view 0 ie legal valuation .
    In KSB1 transaction one option comes in Extras -> Actual valuation where the user can select 0 or 1 .
    But in Ksb2 this option is greyed out .
    So system is reading valuation view 1 & I am not able to understand from which settings ?
    Need help on this .Do we mention any where in the variant relating to Valuation View ?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    I think try to check with your Basis person. Do /nSU53 in KSB2 to see if any authorisation issue is involved.
    Regards
    Divraj

  • Commitment Item for one deleted PO item

    Hi Expert,
    For one PO item for WBS, we have deleted it. but we don't understand why the commitment item is still here, can be seen from CJI5. How can we delete this commitment ?
    The PO is intercompany transfer PO. No PR existed.
    Thanks and Regards
    Shubin

    Hi,
    Please verify if the note mentioned in the previous reply is applicable for your Release.
    If that not edoes not help then follow the steps below:
    1) Go to Tcode: CJEN
    2) Enter the Project ID
    3) Remove the check mark on Back ground processing, test run, and put check marks on all others. Put the check mark on Delete.
    4) Execute.
    5) Repeat Step 1 thru Step 4by removing the check mark on delete as well.
    6) In case you want to see if the commitment are getting Removed for the PO, execute Step 1 thru Step 5 with the check mark on test run.
    Hope it help...
    Thanks!!!

  • Single line item for multiple line item payment.

    Hi
    I have booked the 3 vendor invoices (in FB60) for a single vendor. Now today i paid (with F-53) all the three invoices together. One payment document number was generated.
    However when i saw the vendor line item, i saw that three debit line items was generated for the clearing the open invoices (i..e 3 credit line items). so when i say vendor line item report, there were total 6 cleared line items (3 for credit i.e invoice and 3 for debit i.e. payments)
    But is it possible to get  single debit line item for all the three invoices cleared. If yes, please let me know how i can get it.
    If i will have one single line item for payment, vendor report would be simpler. Please help

    Hi,
    1. If you do payment through F-53, then each invoice have separate payment line item. This is not avoidable. If you do payment through F110, then you can group the line items for payment, so there only one payment line item for many number of invoices.
    2. While clearing through F-44, system is generating automatic line items because, there are exchange rate fluctuations. You can't avoid these line items, as these automatic line items only match Debit and Credit amounts in order to post the document.
    Rgds
    Murali. N

Maybe you are looking for