Ksb2 transaction ( Display commitment item for CC )authorisation issue

In my project some of the user are facing problem to display for the T code KSb2 ( Commitment Item report for cost center ).
Mesage : No authorisation to display valuation view 1 for controlling Area .
User has in her authorisation profile to display valuation view 0 ie legal valuation .
In KSB1 transaction one option comes in Extras -> Actual valuation where the user can select 0 or 1 .
But in Ksb2 this option is greyed out .
So system is reading valuation view 1 & I am not able to understand from which settings ?
Need help on this .Do we mention any where in the variant relating to Valuation View ?
Thanks

Hi,
I think try to check with your Basis person. Do /nSU53 in KSB2 to see if any authorisation issue is involved.
Regards
Divraj

Similar Messages

  • How to Change financial trasnactin for commitment item for which no trasnaction has been posted

    Hi ,
    1.
    \We re in process to Go live for he FUND Management module for Power generation business, while we create all  FM master data and budget structure we found a mistake in NONBUDGET commitment items. we wrongly mapped financial transaction 30, while changing it to 40 system showing following massage,
    Field "Fin.transaction" cannot be changed
        Message no. F6288
    Diagnosis
        You can no longer change the entry in field Fin.transaction as commitment
        item NONBUDGET in FM area SAPL and fiscal year  has already been defined
        as a budget object.
    System Response
        Field Fin.transaction is not changed.
    2. when we try to delete the commitment item system showing following error
    Commitment item NONBUDGET in FM area  and Fyear SAPL defined as a budget
    object
        Message no. F6206
    Diagnosis
        The commitment item NONBUDGET in the FM area SAPL and fiscal year  was
        defined as a budget object.
    System Response
        The chosen action was not executed.
    Procedure
        Remove the indentification Budget object in the budget structure.
    As per above error we check the following details
    1. FM deriver - Removed NONBUDGET from all the rule
    2. There is no Budget/ Posting in FM9k
    3. There is no activation of budget ( no golive)
    4 There is no data posted with the commitment Items

    Hi Jeetendra
    Try deleting the budget structure using FMBSBO_DEL.
    Thanks
    Shyam

  • Financial transaction and commitment item category

    Hello,
    Can any one suggest what financial transaction and commitment item category can be used when creating the following commitment items:
    u2022     Value added tax (VAT)
    u2022     tax on profits
    u2022     before-tax income
    u2022     nett income
    u2022     net financial result
    And moreover, should such a commitment items be created?
    Thanks
    Irina

    Hi Irina,
    As I said, the real question is whether you are going to use these commitment items for budget management. If not, it does not really matter if it will be defined 50/2 or 50/3 - in any case, the AVC will not be applied to these lines. It's not even necessary to define a separate commitment item for these G/Ls; it's possible to define one dummy commitment item for all transactions which are not relevant for budget activities.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Financial Transactions in commitment item

    Hi Gurus
    We are facing this error while entering the Goods receipt i.e MIGO
    Transaction for a import materail while trying to save the MIGO we are
    getting the error " Posting not Possible;Incorrect financial
    transactions of commitment item" We tried to change the financial
    transactions but still the system is showing the same error and not
    allowing us to save the MIGO.
    Please suggest some solution as it is very urgent issue and affecting our business operations.
    Regards
    chetan

    Hi,
    Use t.code: FS00 and check the GR/IR , Stock accounts and other G/L involves and  see what is the field status group , you have maintained for all G/L’s.
    Now use t.code: OBC4
    Select your field status variant & Click Filed Status Group TAB and check the Filed Status Group, what u have mentioned for the GR/IR ,Stock account & other G/L’s
    Go To additional account assignment segment and put optional entry for the commitment item and save.( hope for any one of your G/L, is it required entry, just change and make it optional)
    Now try ur transaction.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Budgetory Commitment Items for Recon. accounts

    Hi Experts,
    I have a requirement of budgeting trade creditors in SAP. Currently in our legacy system we are budgeting trade creditors as well as expenses.
    Now as per SAP point of view my understanding is that we can only budget expense and revenue items. But for recon. accounts like vendor and customer, budgeting is not possible in SAP. I tried creating a commitment item for vendor recon. account with financial transaction 30 and commitment item category 3 and the same was assigned to recon. account in FS00. I posted budget in this commitment item with reference to fund and fund center through FMBB(T.code). Budget category "payment" was used for posting this budget and budget was successfully posted. Now when i tried to post the invoice to vendor, the system asks me to enter fund and fund center in vendor line item as well. i provided the fund and fund center in vendor line item to which i posted budget earlier in FMBB. the document gets posted without any error but when i view the budget consumption report instead of deducting invoice amount from the  consumable budget amount and show the net available budget system add this in the consumable budget and shows the net result as bellow:
    can any one guide if budgeting of such item is possible in sap FM or can we just budget P/L items? need your guidance please.

    Hi,
    Payments made to a vendor can be tracked through FI/FI-CA modules.
    As for PSM-FM, please, comprehend and explain to your client two important points:
    a) You won't be able to budget a vendor separately, but only, and still hypothetically, through reconciliation account, which makes the whole thing meaningless, as there will be no control on specific vendor
    b) You won't stop payment, from business perspective, to a vendor on duly registered invoice just because 'the budget was exceeded'
    If your client is interested to follow the payments, he can 'budget' bank accounts. Again, this does not make any sense (at least, a blocking budgeting), because the control is already applied through treasury components and bank account balance itself. Still, technically, it could be done.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Commitment Item for Balance Sheet accounts

    Hi all,
    Can someone clearly explain the need to create commitment items for balance sheet accounts? I have searched a lot and have not found a satisfactory explanation. Since balance sheet accts are typically not budgeted, why do they even have to be reflected in FM?
    Please explain.
    Thanks,
    MJ

    Hi,
    Sometimes, there is a need in budget check, through posting on balance sheet accounts, e.g. stocks, assets, etc. However, in most other cases it's indeed not necessary and the commitment item given should be either dummy one or in special cases, GR/IR, banks, etc., defined specifically for the issue in question.
    Keep in mind, that once FM is activated every relevant posting must have FM assignment, including those on balance sheet accounts. That's why, even if you don't want to manage the budget, you have to assign FM objects to these postings.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Funds Management - Commitment items for all GLs

    Hello -
    When we activate Funds Management, System expects a commitment item for every GL, including Bank accounts and Inventory accounts. I want system to expect commitment item only for expense accounts. How can I Do it. As such, we donu2019t have a budget for bank accounts.
    Thanks in advance.
    Chris
    Edited by: Chris Farr on Nov 24, 2008 12:14 PM

    Just read Eli's  msg clearly, its mentioned that GLs have to be assigned to Commitment with right category and Fin transacton. Just explored the IDES FM areas 1000,3000 and 4000 and understood the following but with couple of questions ( mentioned below)
    Expenditure     30/3     
    Asset exp                     30/3     
    GR/IR - Clearing     40/3     
    Misc clearing      40/3     
    Liquid funds / Bank a/cs     90/1     
    All other bank chk pable/ Recbles     80/3     
    Trade recble     60/2     it make sense, but in FM area 3000, Receivables defined as 30/3 ?
    Trade payable     60/3     it make sense, but in FM area 3000, Receivables defined as 30/3 ?
    Tax payable     30/2     Why category '2' here?
    Input tax                     30/2     Why category '2' here?
    WOULD APPRECIATE IF SOMEBODY CAN CLARIFY MY QUESTIONS ABOVE.
    Hope this info is useful and not mis guiding
    Thanks
    Chris

  • Some Commitment item for one GL account

    Dear experts!
    Now, I'm getting some issue about Funds management.
    - The first, my company have three department and the each of department have a budget. The detail, Department A have budget is 50M, Department B have budget is 40M and department C have budget is 60M. Therefore, I have create three commitment item corresponding  to three departments and three budget. In date 20.01.2014 my company have to buy material A for three department (A, B, C).
    - Second, my company create a PR for three department (ABC) with three line item in t.code ME51. Here, can I assign three commitment item to corresponding to three line item? if i can do it then do the system check budget in the case? After that if the PR pass, then I create PO from PR and can I assign three commitment for three line item? In the PO, if I don't assign commitment item for three line Item then in the step of Good Receipt, how do the system process the problem?
    Help me to process the issue!
    Best regards, Huy

    Hi,
    Commitment item, in reasonable master data management system, should not represent departments: you have fund centres for this. Commitment items in 95% of the cases will map your chart of accounts (G/L). Derivation of fund centre department could be done through other financial/logistic objects, as cost centres, profit centres, plants, etc.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Commitment Items for Multiple services in Service PO

    Hi,
    We have created a service master for all the services used in a project. FM is activated. Every service has 1:1 relation with commitment items.
    Even after table look up & derivation, system was not picking up correct commitment item in service PO. We have used some exits & BADI's, Now system checks picks the correct commitment item stored in FMDERIVE against the service master.
    The issue is, the moment I have multiple service masters in a single service PO with two separate comm. Item.  System picks up the commitment item of only for line item 0010 & posts both the entries against one comm. item.
    Let me know how system can pick up individual commt items.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ajay

    Hi Ajay,
    I believe that there is one standard solution for what you developed. Let me explain better.
    Please check your table FM01X. You can enable one these flags in table FM01X, depending on your business needs:
    FLG_PO_PROTECT if you want to always inherit the fm account assignment from the reference PO and therefore skip FMDERIVE
    FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE if you always want to force a call to fmderive in all cases
    FLG_SES_OVERWRITE in services, if you wish to overwrite the account assignment from the SES with the derived values from FMDERIVE.
    You can find more information in note 1146677 and 923672. Please review the information of the notes and run the programs
    according your needs.
    FMDERIVE is skipped for GR/IR lines and the Commitment item is inherited from the PO regardless of whether or not the GR/IR line is FM relevant. This is SAP standard behavior.
    If you want to force the Commitment item to be derived from the GL account for the GR/IR line, you can use the FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE flag as described in note 923672.  This will allow FMDERIVE to be called for these lines.  Please be sure to fully test this to ensure that FM account assignments that you do not want to be overwritten are
    not incorrectly derived.
    Bear in mind that for PO´s that does not have account assignment you should run FMCN/FMCT + FMN4N. For this you would need to check the flags and which one is more related to your needs. With the appropriate flag marked in FM01X (active with X) you should be able to run the transactions without any issue.
    Based on note 189761, after doing all the previous suggestions and the issue does not appear anymore, I suggest you to run the programs described in the note.
    I believe that this will help you.
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa.

  • Open Purchase order can we maintain commitment item for the year

    hi
    my requirement is for the year open purchase orders we need to maintain commitment item previously it was not maintain from this year we need to maintain is it posssible

    Hi
    If your PO has an IO or WBS or a Cost center maintained in it - Run the Program RKANBU01 in SE38 and it will push all the past data of commitments into the CO objects
    You need to activate Commitment management in OKKP as well as in IO Type... If IO was created w/o the tick ON, then I believe you dont have a choice here..
    br, Ajay M

  • Commitment item for component check in MIGO

    Hi All,
    FM implemented. While doing Gi for the prod order and while checking for the component item ok.
    I am facing the error No committment item entered in item 00000.
    Please help how to do Gi.

    Hi,
    try entering commitment item in GL account.
    Paolo

  • Commitment Item for one deleted PO item

    Hi Expert,
    For one PO item for WBS, we have deleted it. but we don't understand why the commitment item is still here, can be seen from CJI5. How can we delete this commitment ?
    The PO is intercompany transfer PO. No PR existed.
    Thanks and Regards
    Shubin

    Hi,
    Please verify if the note mentioned in the previous reply is applicable for your Release.
    If that not edoes not help then follow the steps below:
    1) Go to Tcode: CJEN
    2) Enter the Project ID
    3) Remove the check mark on Back ground processing, test run, and put check marks on all others. Put the check mark on Delete.
    4) Execute.
    5) Repeat Step 1 thru Step 4by removing the check mark on delete as well.
    6) In case you want to see if the commitment are getting Removed for the PO, execute Step 1 thru Step 5 with the check mark on test run.
    Hope it help...
    Thanks!!!

  • FS10N - Not displaying line items for Archiving document

    Hi Experts,
    When we are double clicking on the FS10N accont display balance report to get line item reprot, it is not displaying archived document data. We have also deleted secondary indexes for those archived document.
    We are able to get same report while using FBL3N with Archive info structure loaded with data.
    Please suggest how to do FS10N archive enabled?
    Thanks,
    SamirV.

    Hi Samir,
    You should look at the following SAP notes and implement the corrections:
    792515
    776164
    and 831568 (if you use business areas)
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Display line items for cost elelment

    Hi Experts
    Could you please tell me the transaction for checking line item details for a cost element. This cost element is not created as GL account in FI. Hence I am not able to check it through FI transactions such as FS10N or FBL5N
    Regards,
    Santosh

    Hi,
    Is this secondary cost element?
    goto S_ALR_87013613 - Range: Cost Elements
    enter cost element and other information and execute.
    Thanks,
    Rau

  • Report KSB2 - CO Committment line item  for Cost center

    When the report is executed, system provides the Fiscal year as next year data.
    Can some body help me in understanding why system behave like this.
    regards
    ARvind

    I got the solution from COEP table.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Oracle sql developer version

    Hi, My first question is where do i find the version of oracle sql developer? My second question is when i check one of the OSUSER name column is null.how it occurs? and how do i give corresponding name to its column? Kindly help . thanx in advance

  • Getting 24P raw footage from PP ro ENcore

    Could someone outline an inter-application rundown between PREMIERE PRO and ENCORE of procedures and settings that make the most of 24P raw footage in editing and output. This would include navigating extremely confusing respective frame rates of 23.

  • Abap encoding help

    hallow i doing a program that transfer data from internal table to xml file . i transfer it in utf-8 (becouse just like that i can use it in xml editor). when i transfer <b>english</b> char and numbers its <b>o.k</b>. the problem is when i move hebre

  • What is the cause of a null username in sys.aud$

    I have two records in sys.aud$ with a null username. They are a logon and a alter user. What does that mean? Was it a connect / as sysdba?

  • Procedure must have an explicit interface specified

    hello all, i'm facing a problem i don't understand. Here is a piece of code that compiles well with gfortran, but not on sun studio: program test_fortran   implicit none   interface      subroutine f1(t)        double precision, intent(in), dimension