Commitment item for component check in MIGO

Hi All,
FM implemented. While doing Gi for the prod order and while checking for the component item ok.
I am facing the error No committment item entered in item 00000.
Please help how to do Gi.

Hi,
try entering commitment item in GL account.
Paolo

Similar Messages

Commitment Item for Balance Sheet accounts

Hi all,
Can someone clearly explain the need to create commitment items for balance sheet accounts? I have searched a lot and have not found a satisfactory explanation. Since balance sheet accts are typically not budgeted, why do they even have to be reflected in FM?
Please explain.
Thanks,
MJ

Hi,
Sometimes, there is a need in budget check, through posting on balance sheet accounts, e.g. stocks, assets, etc. However, in most other cases it's indeed not necessary and the commitment item given should be either dummy one or in special cases, GR/IR, banks, etc., defined specifically for the issue in question.
Keep in mind, that once FM is activated every relevant posting must have FM assignment, including those on balance sheet accounts. That's why, even if you don't want to manage the budget, you have to assign FM objects to these postings.
Regards,
Eli

Some Commitment item for one GL account

Dear experts!
Now, I'm getting some issue about Funds management.
- The first, my company have three department and the each of department have a budget. The detail, Department A have budget is 50M, Department B have budget is 40M and department C have budget is 60M. Therefore, I have create three commitment item corresponding to three departments and three budget. In date 20.01.2014 my company have to buy material A for three department (A, B, C).
- Second, my company create a PR for three department (ABC) with three line item in t.code ME51. Here, can I assign three commitment item to corresponding to three line item? if i can do it then do the system check budget in the case? After that if the PR pass, then I create PO from PR and can I assign three commitment for three line item? In the PO, if I don't assign commitment item for three line Item then in the step of Good Receipt, how do the system process the problem?
Help me to process the issue!
Best regards, Huy

Hi,
Commitment item, in reasonable master data management system, should not represent departments: you have fund centres for this. Commitment items in 95% of the cases will map your chart of accounts (G/L). Derivation of fund centre department could be done through other financial/logistic objects, as cost centres, profit centres, plants, etc.
Regards,
Eli

Budgetory Commitment Items for Recon. accounts

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement of budgeting trade creditors in SAP. Currently in our legacy system we are budgeting trade creditors as well as expenses.
Now as per SAP point of view my understanding is that we can only budget expense and revenue items. But for recon. accounts like vendor and customer, budgeting is not possible in SAP. I tried creating a commitment item for vendor recon. account with financial transaction 30 and commitment item category 3 and the same was assigned to recon. account in FS00. I posted budget in this commitment item with reference to fund and fund center through FMBB(T.code). Budget category "payment" was used for posting this budget and budget was successfully posted. Now when i tried to post the invoice to vendor, the system asks me to enter fund and fund center in vendor line item as well. i provided the fund and fund center in vendor line item to which i posted budget earlier in FMBB. the document gets posted without any error but when i view the budget consumption report instead of deducting invoice amount from the consumable budget amount and show the net available budget system add this in the consumable budget and shows the net result as bellow:
can any one guide if budgeting of such item is possible in sap FM or can we just budget P/L items? need your guidance please.

Hi,
Payments made to a vendor can be tracked through FI/FI-CA modules.
As for PSM-FM, please, comprehend and explain to your client two important points:
a) You won't be able to budget a vendor separately, but only, and still hypothetically, through reconciliation account, which makes the whole thing meaningless, as there will be no control on specific vendor
b) You won't stop payment, from business perspective, to a vendor on duly registered invoice just because 'the budget was exceeded'
If your client is interested to follow the payments, he can 'budget' bank accounts. Again, this does not make any sense (at least, a blocking budgeting), because the control is already applied through treasury components and bank account balance itself. Still, technically, it could be done.
Regards,
Eli

Funds Management - Commitment items for all GLs

Hello -
When we activate Funds Management, System expects a commitment item for every GL, including Bank accounts and Inventory accounts. I want system to expect commitment item only for expense accounts. How can I Do it. As such, we donu2019t have a budget for bank accounts.
Thanks in advance.
Chris
Edited by: Chris Farr on Nov 24, 2008 12:14 PM

Just read Eli's msg clearly, its mentioned that GLs have to be assigned to Commitment with right category and Fin transacton. Just explored the IDES FM areas 1000,3000 and 4000 and understood the following but with couple of questions ( mentioned below)
Expenditure     30/3
Asset exp                     30/3
GR/IR - Clearing     40/3
Misc clearing      40/3
Liquid funds / Bank a/cs     90/1
All other bank chk pable/ Recbles     80/3
Trade recble     60/2     it make sense, but in FM area 3000, Receivables defined as 30/3 ?
Trade payable     60/3     it make sense, but in FM area 3000, Receivables defined as 30/3 ?
Tax payable     30/2     Why category '2' here?
Input tax                     30/2     Why category '2' here?
WOULD APPRECIATE IF SOMEBODY CAN CLARIFY MY QUESTIONS ABOVE.
Hope this info is useful and not mis guiding
Thanks
Chris

Commitment item in MIGO for component check

Hi All,
In the current project FM has been implemented. When I am doing GI in Migo and ehen component item check for ok, I am getting error Commmitment item entered in item 00000. How to do the GI.

Fi consultant should define commitment item and budget for the Gl Account.

How to Change financial trasnactin for commitment item for which no trasnaction has been posted

Hi ,
1.
\We re in process to Go live for he FUND Management module for Power generation business, while we create all FM master data and budget structure we found a mistake in NONBUDGET commitment items. we wrongly mapped financial transaction 30, while changing it to 40 system showing following massage,
Field "Fin.transaction" cannot be changed
    Message no. F6288
Diagnosis
    You can no longer change the entry in field Fin.transaction as commitment
    item NONBUDGET in FM area SAPL and fiscal year has already been defined
    as a budget object.
System Response
    Field Fin.transaction is not changed.
2. when we try to delete the commitment item system showing following error
Commitment item NONBUDGET in FM area and Fyear SAPL defined as a budget
object
    Message no. F6206
Diagnosis
    The commitment item NONBUDGET in the FM area SAPL and fiscal year was
    defined as a budget object.
System Response
    The chosen action was not executed.
Procedure
    Remove the indentification Budget object in the budget structure.
As per above error we check the following details
1. FM deriver - Removed NONBUDGET from all the rule
2. There is no Budget/ Posting in FM9k
3. There is no activation of budget ( no golive)
4 There is no data posted with the commitment Items

Hi Jeetendra
Try deleting the budget structure using FMBSBO_DEL.
Thanks
Shyam

Commitment Items for Multiple services in Service PO

Hi,
We have created a service master for all the services used in a project. FM is activated. Every service has 1:1 relation with commitment items.
Even after table look up & derivation, system was not picking up correct commitment item in service PO. We have used some exits & BADI's, Now system checks picks the correct commitment item stored in FMDERIVE against the service master.
The issue is, the moment I have multiple service masters in a single service PO with two separate comm. Item. System picks up the commitment item of only for line item 0010 & posts both the entries against one comm. item.
Let me know how system can pick up individual commt items.
Thanks & Regards,
Ajay

Hi Ajay,
I believe that there is one standard solution for what you developed. Let me explain better.
Please check your table FM01X. You can enable one these flags in table FM01X, depending on your business needs:
FLG_PO_PROTECT if you want to always inherit the fm account assignment from the reference PO and therefore skip FMDERIVE
FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE if you always want to force a call to fmderive in all cases
FLG_SES_OVERWRITE in services, if you wish to overwrite the account assignment from the SES with the derived values from FMDERIVE.
You can find more information in note 1146677 and 923672. Please review the information of the notes and run the programs
according your needs.
FMDERIVE is skipped for GR/IR lines and the Commitment item is inherited from the PO regardless of whether or not the GR/IR line is FM relevant. This is SAP standard behavior.
If you want to force the Commitment item to be derived from the GL account for the GR/IR line, you can use the FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE flag as described in note 923672. This will allow FMDERIVE to be called for these lines. Please be sure to fully test this to ensure that FM account assignments that you do not want to be overwritten are
not incorrectly derived.
Bear in mind that for PO´s that does not have account assignment you should run FMCN/FMCT + FMN4N. For this you would need to check the flags and which one is more related to your needs. With the appropriate flag marked in FM01X (active with X) you should be able to run the transactions without any issue.
Based on note 189761, after doing all the previous suggestions and the issue does not appear anymore, I suggest you to run the programs described in the note.
I believe that this will help you.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

Ksb2 transaction ( Display commitment item for CC )authorisation issue

In my project some of the user are facing problem to display for the T code KSb2 ( Commitment Item report for cost center ).
Mesage : No authorisation to display valuation view 1 for controlling Area .
User has in her authorisation profile to display valuation view 0 ie legal valuation .
In KSB1 transaction one option comes in Extras -> Actual valuation where the user can select 0 or 1 .
But in Ksb2 this option is greyed out .
So system is reading valuation view 1 & I am not able to understand from which settings ?
Need help on this .Do we mention any where in the variant relating to Valuation View ?
Thanks

Hi,
I think try to check with your Basis person. Do /nSU53 in KSB2 to see if any authorisation issue is involved.
Regards
Divraj

Commitment Item for one deleted PO item

Hi Expert,
For one PO item for WBS, we have deleted it. but we don't understand why the commitment item is still here, can be seen from CJI5. How can we delete this commitment ?
The PO is intercompany transfer PO. No PR existed.
Thanks and Regards
Shubin

Hi,
Please verify if the note mentioned in the previous reply is applicable for your Release.
If that not edoes not help then follow the steps below:
1) Go to Tcode: CJEN
2) Enter the Project ID
3) Remove the check mark on Back ground processing, test run, and put check marks on all others. Put the check mark on Delete.
4) Execute.
5) Repeat Step 1 thru Step 4by removing the check mark on delete as well.
6) In case you want to see if the commitment are getting Removed for the PO, execute Step 1 thru Step 5 with the check mark on test run.
Hope it help...
Thanks!!!

Open Purchase order can we maintain commitment item for the year

hi
my requirement is for the year open purchase orders we need to maintain commitment item previously it was not maintain from this year we need to maintain is it posssible

Hi
If your PO has an IO or WBS or a Cost center maintained in it - Run the Program RKANBU01 in SE38 and it will push all the past data of commitments into the CO objects
You need to activate Commitment management in OKKP as well as in IO Type... If IO was created w/o the tick ON, then I believe you dont have a choice here..
br, Ajay M

Tables related to PM order for actual and commitment items

Hello Experts,
I need help in finding the tables related to PM order for actual and commitment items.
I need develop a report which can show the actual and commitment items for each order and Operation/component under that each ITEM wise and its related documents.
For the component we can find the table RESB.
But i am getting the difficult to find the data related to Operation (services)
In my client we can able to see PM orders with activity types and SKF
How can build the logic to find the values for each operation item and its commitments (PO, PR) and actual that is FI documents
Please guide me the TABLES and fields or else give me the hints, how can find the tables
Thanks and Regards,
Narendra

Hi,
The tables are COEP (actuals) and COOI (commitments); that is if you mean the financial figures.
Regards,
Eli

No commitment item entered in item 00002 SCL 270303

Hi,
I had implemented Funds Management.All configuration is done.Now when im posting a FI entry system is neither giving any budget exceed message nor recognisisng Second line items Commitment .
Basically sytem is not recognising commitment items for the the GL which are assigned to Dummy commitments.
below is the error.
Help if anybody is having any input
No commitment item entered in item 00002 SCL 270303
Message no. FI311
Diagnosis
The posted document contains at least one company code in which Funds Management, Cash Budget Management, or Project Cash Management is active. Therefore you must enter a commitment item in all involved company codes.
Procedure
Enter a commitment item.
If you cannot enter a commitment item, check with your system administrator that your account assignment derivation is adjusted so that the system can automatically derive a commitment item from another account assignment, or from the G/L or cost element

Hi Deepa
Suppose when you post a document rs 5000 and you post the budget on that GL 4000, then system not post the document and give the errro Budget is exceed something.
In that case you check in SPRO -Public sector management -Fund management goverment -Actual & commitment update - integration - Active& deactive fund management
Here you check out fund management is active or deactive.If deactive then system not given the message budget exceddand not update the budget report.
2. No commitment item entered in item 00002 SCL 270303
in that case check the derivation rule Fmderiver transaction code , here you see you assign GL to commitment item
B) you go to the transaction code FMBSBO - Budget adddress - here you assign commitment item to fund center
then also go to FMBSPO - Payment address - here alos you assign the commitment item to fund center
Kindly revert in case of any query
Regards
Roobal

GR/IR - Commitment item derivation

Hi everyone,
In our case (ECC 6) the GL acct number and CI number are always the same. However, when i look at a couple documents that have GR/IR posting, the GL account and commitment item are different. I cannot see any possible derivation rule that can possibly cause this. I did see other discussions in this forum about a 'fmderive-bypass' for GR / IR transactions. Can someone explain in more detail what this is and if it is relevant in my scenario? Secondly if if GR/IR GL account 123 derives commiitment item 456 (instead of CI 123), then wher exactly is this set? what setting do i need to look into to find out where and why this is happening?
Thank you,

Hi ,
As per the issue that you are facing , you have defined the same commitment item for same GL A/c .
The possible reasons for the same are the derivation rules that you have defined in FMDERIVER .
Kindly check the derivation strategy that you have defined - FMDERIVE .
Secondly check the relevant GL A/c what is the commitment item that you have enterd there .
For having a check on how the derivation is taking place during the transaction , you can always activate the trace and see how the commitment items are getting populated .
for activating the trace do the following : go to FMDERIVE - double click the relevant derivation strategy - click on the test button and in the bottom u will see an option for trace activate that and you will find that a green signal is populate at the right end corner .
do take care to check the transaction from the same user ID where in you have activated the trace .
Cheers ,
Dewang

Commitment Item in Stock Transport Order

Hi,
We are planning to carry out a intercompany sales using a stock transport PO.
My problem is when a STO is created Account assignment tab in the item overview is not visible because of which i am not able to enter the commitment item for the material.
I have tried activating the BADI : ME_COMMITMENT_STO_CH.
I have used the sample coding given in the method.
But still i face the same problem.
How do we get this commitment item field in STO of is there some other way by which this issue can be handled.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi Arokianathan,
I understand you are trying to put account assignment category like 'K' in transaction ME21N for creation of an intercompany STO.
You have two choices 1) Use transaction ME21 (old) and not ME21N
2) In transaction ME21N , use type of order as Return PO , this will remove the greying in the account assignment category field, you can now put in your value like K etc ... Afterwards you have to goto tothe top and again select document type as Intercompany STO.
Ones you fill in the material number and other details the account assignment tab page would automatically appear in the sub item level.
Hope this helps..
Regards
Arnab Maitra

Commitment item for component check in MIGO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for