Communication IDoc is not generating after master IDoc for "DEBMAS"

Hi gurus,
i have done all steps from the beginning to the end for an Idoc transfer of type "DEBMAS".I have created the settings in BD61,BD50 and BD52.And also i can work with other master message types like ARTMAS.I didn't give any filter groups in BD64 for the message type "DEBMAS".When ever i execute BD21(RBDMIDOC) only master idoc is generating,there is no communication idocs for the message type "DEBMAS".Please help someone in this issue.
My special question / doubt is, when ever a master idoc creating ,is it must to create a communication idoc ,if there is no filter in "DEBMAS"?
Please clear someone and explain my doubt.
your help will be highly appreciative...
rgds
tom
Moderator message: Please don't use all upper case in subject line
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Feb 28, 2010 5:25 PM

hi,
communication IDoc is missing when ...
- Distribution Modell is missing
- Filter in Distribution Model is existing an no IDoc is generated (Filter at KNA1M segment only)
try the following.
Goto BD12. Choose your partner and the receiving System and send an IDoc.
Is the Comm. IDoc generated ?
if yes ... there is something with your ChangePointer Logik (BD52, .... look at Table BDCP/V)
if no ... you should take a deeper look at BD64 distribution model.
Maybe the receiver partner or filter is not correct.
good luck,
Gordon
Edited by: Gordon Breuer on Feb 25, 2010 1:12 PM

Similar Messages

  • RE : IDOCS did not Generate after payment run

    I have a unique issue.  After APP run (ACH) all accounting entries & payment document created corectly. However idoc's for 3 vendors did not generated. There is no issue with configuration as this is not a new vendor and every month payments made off automatically. Vendor complained non receipt of payment after 10 days  and I could not find the log for that day. Could anyone please give some hints what could have gone wrong if anyone is expereinced this issue. As I said earlier all config and set up are correct and infact after that one payment is made to that vendor.
    Thanks
    Ivan

    Hi,
    Once APP run completed, Vendor open items will be cleared.
    You have to create IDOC using WE19.
    Run the Idoc using AL11
    may be your problem will be solved
    Thanks
    Chandra

  • Communcation idoc not formed from master idocs

    Hi,
    I thoroughly searched all threads and could not find one on this.
    We have an issue where when we run RBDMIDOC program in production system only master idocs are formed, and no communication idocs are formed. There is no error message. But in testing system communication idocs gets generated from master idocs. We encounter no error.
    I checked partner profile and distribution model in testing and production, they were same.
    My query is that if the Program is successfully generating communication idocs in testing system, why not is it doing so in production system. Please help me on this.
    Thanks & Regards
    Amit Sharma

    Hi,
    We had same kind of issue. This was happend due to Distrubution channel not properly created.
    We re created the Distrubution channel agian properly then it worked fine.
    Check the distrubution channel config . this will solve the issue.
    Regards,
    Shanumgavel chandrasekaran.

  • In IDoc to file example if IDoc has not generated?what might be the problem

    In IDoc to file example if IDoc has not generated? what might be the problem? where we can find it?

    Hi Sudhakar,
      We need to check in sm58 of R/3 system for any errors..and according to the error message we have to fix the problem.
      It can fail with many reasons for example error in RFC destination connection etc.
    Regards,
    Prasanthi.

  • Outbound Idocs are not generated for some material number MATNR

    Hi all,
    We are using a custom program to process the IDOCS to some other thirdparty systems.
    but the problem is the IDOCS are not generated and also we can't find the IDocs in TRFC also.
    But it is working for the other matnr.
    I have already debug the custom program, and it is taking all the inputs correctly.
    plz guide me guys

    Hi Praveen,
    This is the code I am using
    LOOP AT GS-MATNR_WERKS ASSIGNING <MATNR_WERKS>
    GS-COUNT = GS-COUNT + 1.
        GS-TEXT  = 'IDOC for Material & & (& of &) is just being created'(001).
        REPLACE '&' WITH <MATNR_WERKS>-MATNR INTO GS-TEXT.
        REPLACE '&' WITH <MATNR_WERKS>-WERKS INTO GS-TEXT.
        REPLACE '&' WITH GS-COUNT            INTO GS-TEXT.
        REPLACE '&' WITH GS-LINES            INTO GS-TEXT.
        CONDENSE GS-TEXT.
        CALL FUNCTION 'SAPGUI_PROGRESS_INDICATOR'
             EXPORTING
                  TEXT = GS-TEXT
    validation code for the MATNR & WEKRS
    CALL FUNCTION 'Z_MASTERIDOC_DISTRIB_ZCOPEBOM'
             EXPORTING
                  MATNR        = <MATNR_WERKS>-MATNR
                  WERKS        = <MATNR_WERKS>-WERKS
                  MESSAGE_TYPE = P_MESTYP
    GS-CREATED = GS-CREATED + 1.
        GS-COMMIT  = GS-COMMIT + 1.
        IF GS-COMMIT >= 100.
          GS-COMMIT = 0.
          COMMIT WORK.
        ENDIF

  • Accounting Document not generated after Post goods issue in delivery order.

    Dear Experts
    Greeting of the daays,
    Need your help on below issue.
    After making the post goods issue ,the system is not making the accounting document.
    The error given by the system is as follows:
    Material document 12365 does not include an accounting document
    Diagnosis
    The system cannot find an accounting document for the material document 12365.
    Possible reasons for this are:
    The goods movement has no relevance to accounting. Therefore, the system did not generate an accounting document for the material document.
    The material document is a document that was posted before Release 2.1. Such documents must be converted so that the system can find the relevant accounting document.
    The procedure for the subsequent calculation of value is not active in your system. For further information, refer to the documentation on the program for valuating goods movements: RM07MWBU.
    __Solution what I tried to solve this issue ,but not successful.__
    __Solution 1- maintain OMS2__
    __Solution 2 - maintain OMJJ- movement type 601 - PRCTR is required entry.__
    __Solution 3 - price maintain is material master.__
    __Solution 4 - OBYC - BSX - 7920 - GLA/c  and GBB- VAX and VAY - 7920 GLA/c.__
    __Pls let me know if there is any confirgation is missing.__

    Hi
    Do this checks:
    In tcode OBYC check if you have the proper entries.
    Go to tcode OKB9 and do the settings for the G/L acc. that you have in OBYC.
    To populate PRCTR you can use OKB9 and you can check if you have values in MARC-PRCTR.
    I hope this helps you
    Regards
    Eduardo

  • Inspection lot not generated after goods reciept?

    Dear SAPIENTS,
    Inspection type 01,0101,08,89 and all activated in material master but then allso inspection lot not generated after goods reciept. Can anybody suggest here that what could be the reason.
    Regards,
    Kaushal Rai

    Hi Kaushal,
    For Inspection lot from GR, 01 Inspection type is enough.
    - Ensure 01 Insp type is active and Post to Inspection stock indicator is active for that inspection type.
    - Ensure the QM is active for 101 Movement type, SPRO>Quality Management>Quality Inspection>Inspection Lot Creation>Inspection for Goods Movements>Deactivate Quality Inspection for a Movement Type
    Regards,
    Keerthi.

  • Role VN not defined in master record for vendor 1000000465

    dear alll,
    while preparing PO, with one vendor system is giving the below message and
    when observed the vendor master data,last view vendor partner roles not updated.
    If i go ahead with the same vendor, after giving tax code, taxes tab not getting open to calculate taxes
    Despite,condition records  are there  for the respective condition types with the key combination material,vendor,plant why system is not picking taxes?
    Role VN not defined in master record for vendor 1000000465
    Message no. ME329
    Diagnosis
    The vendor may only operate as a partner for other vendors (e.g. as ordering address or invoicing party), not as the vendor who actually fulfills the order.
    Procedure
    u2022     If this is a warning message, you can ignore it.
    u2022     If this is an error message add partner role VN to the vendor master record:
    Perform function
    some times taxes getting calculated properly but in print priew, tax related informaton(values) missing.
    what might be the possible reason? please suggest the way

    Message no. ME329
    Check these threads
    [Re: steps to create PO for service order |Re: steps to create PO for service order]
    [How to change the wording of System Messages?|How to change the wording of System Messages?]
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Role VN not defined in master record for vendor

    Hi Experts,
    I have created new partner role (Z1) coping VN and I am using only that in Vendor master. When I create a PO, it still asks for partner role VN to be defined in vendor master. I have checked in partner schema's and the partner role VN is not mandatory. I want to use only customized role Z1 in PO's. Please let me know why the system throws the message "Role VN not defined in master record for vendor XXXX" ?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Venkata Prasanna R

    if you use partner functions, then VN is a mandatory role, regardless if it is set optional.
    There is some coding which only checks on VN partner.
    E.g. in message processing like described in OSS Note 457497 - FAQ: Message processing in purchasing:
    In Customizing, I have configured the partner role OA (ordering address) for message determination and I have assigned this role to the vendor master. However, why is message determination performed for the corresponding vendor (role VN) and not the ordering address (role OA)?
    Answer:
    In the purchase order, correct message determination can be processed only with partner role VN (vendor). If you select the "New partner role determination" (NEUPR) checkbox in Customizing of the message determination for purchase orders, the system proposes all partners for message determination and it transfers the role VN (vendor).
    *If you do not select this checkbox, only the role OA (ordering address) is used for message determination, but the role is changed to VN (vendor) for program-technical reasons.
    It is a restriction of the SAP Basis components that faxes can be sent to vendors only*.

  • IDOC to be generated after Rescheduling of a sale order

    Dear Experts,
    Rescheduling of a sale order with separate message i.e. your sale order has been rescheduled for delivery from 10.11.09 to 15.11.2009, Sorry for the incontinence, Thank you.u201D
              Clarification : U can create SO in SAP with TC VA01 & can change SO with
    TC VA02
    In the changed order I am not able to get how to add that custom message in the IDOC segment  or
    --- Can you tell me how does our system identified a IDOC triggered from a first time created sales order and a changed sales order.  Actually we are sending this IDOC to a non sap system in XML format, so we need to some how tell them that this is a changed idoc . as they identify IDOC by order05 name ,So  our IDOC should be a able to distinguish itself.
    I dont have access to functional consultant, So depending on SDN for tables and fields .
    Waiting for ur valuable comments.
    Simraan.

    Hao Chenna Reddy,
                                          Thanks for the inputs i am trying that way, I guess now i have to write a custome idoc and run it separately . Or any other easy way...actually  the functional requirement was to trigger the IDOC when the changed document is saved.
    Waitig for your futher comments.
    Regards,
    Simraan.

  • DME Output not Generated after Payment Run in F110

    Hello,
    I have a typical problem. I have been running the payment run for a Finland Company  and I am not able to generate the DME data medium contents in the overview which generally appears for other company.
    I have checked the Payment Method for the Country and the Format given there is FI_LUM2. And the Payment Method Workbench is selected instead of the classic payment programs. In the payment method for company code there are no forms available. I just wanted to ask whether it is mandatory to define a form at the company code level in case of a Payment Method Workbench being used in Country payment method?
    About the customizing of PMW Payment Medium formats I went to the node Adjust Payment Medium Formats and then checked at standard settings for the relevant format FI_LUM2 and found that payment medium accompanying sheet was not ticked. Could this be the cause.
    I don't really understand. Please help me out.
    Thanks
    Chetan Mahapatra.

    Hi,
    Run payment through F110 without putting variant name in front of RFFOEDI1.
    After running F110, go to SE38 transaction and put all the detail and execute, system will tell you the reason of not generating IDOC.
    Regards
    K Khatri

  • Multiple ALEAUD Idocs are being generated per original Idoc

    We have the following scenario in PI:
    ERP (IDOC)> PI (JDBC)> 3rd Party
    PI sends ALEAUD idocs back to ERP when the process is successful.  Program RBDAPP01 is then ran on a schedule to update the ALEAUD idoc status, which in turn, updates the idoc status of the orignal idoc sent from ERP (03 to 12). 
    We just upgraded our PI from 7.0 to 7.1.  Now, it seems multiple ALEAUD idocs are being created for each ERP outbound idoc.  It used to be 1-to-1.  From what I can tell, it look like an ALEAUD it created for every receiver.  For example, if we sent one idoc and the data goes to 3 receivers, 3 ALEAUD idocs are created.   This causes an issue because the first ALEAUD idoc will update the original outbound idoc to status 12, but any other ones will take it from status 12 to status 09.  We want it to stay in status 12. 
    Any ideas why 7.1 would be any different?

    This seems to be the standard behavior. I will explain it.
    If an idoc comes and message is sent to say three receivers, all the three message  should generate the ack unless they are not disabled. And in this case you will find multiple ALEAUD message at sender. In case the receiver adapters are like File, JDBC which do not support application ack, then ALEAUD won't be sent and you will receiver "Applicaition Ack Not Supported". With this error, if multiple ack are seen in sender then I guess they won't actually perform any update.
    Regards,
    Prateek

  • Schedule lines not generated after MRP run

    Dear All,
    I am trying to create Schedule lines through MRP run , but instead system creates MRP element PRqRel  and its PurRqs when i check in MD04 ,  the following are the prerequisite i done before MRP run , but still Schedule lines are not generating.
    1.activated checkbox source list in material master.,Procurement type is F, MRP type PD , lot size MB , marked JIT  Scheduling indicator as 1 in Pur view of material master , no MRP group is used in our process.
    2.Maintained Inforecord.
    3.Maintained source list for the material and marked MRP relevant as 2. Validity also checked.
    4. Quota arrangement for this vendor only.
    5. Created New scheduling agreement.
    6. Material is not sent for subcontracting.
    7. Ran  MD02 with following parameters ,
    Processing key NETCH Net Change in Total Horizon
    Create purchase req. 1 Purchase requisitions in opening period
    Delivery schedules 3 Schedule lines
    Create MRP list 1 MRP list
    Planning mode 3 Adapt planning data (normal mode)
    Please let me know if i am missing something
    Thanks in Advance
    Benny

    Hi,
    Please check the below links...
    Schedule Lines not getting created in MRP
    Schedule Lines not generated for MRP Type PD
    Kuber

  • Trigger an outbound idoc to sender system after inbound idoc has status 53

    Hi all,
    We have two different partners (say A and B)which send inbound idoc to ECC of same message type WMMBXY. This updates goods movement. The partner A collects the idocs(WE20 partner profile setting) and partner B trigger's immediately. Now our requirement is after successful processing of idocs (satus 53) we need to send another type of idocs to the sender regarding the updation/ changes occured in ECC.
    Since partner A collects the idocs how can we check that it reaches 53 status and send the outbound idoc to A.
    Kindly help me in solving this issue.
    Thanks,
    Aravind

    Create a new process code WMMB to ZMMB & assign a FM ZL_IDOC_INPUT_WMMBXY
    & call the standard FM L_IDOC_INPUT_WMMBXY , check the status or any error other wise create a new IDOC using
    Master_IDOC_CREATE, hope the solution works for you

  • AWR snapsohots not generating after restart of the instance

    oracle : 10.2.0.3
    OS : Linux 64-bit
    Issue : AWR snapshots are being generated after restart of the instance.
    I restarted the instance at 31.01.2010 8 AM CST.
    SQL> select STARTUP_TIME from  v$instance;
    STARTUP_T
    31-JAN-10
    SQL> select max(begin_interval_time)   from DBA_HIST_SNAPSHOT
      2  /
    MAX(BEGIN_INTERVAL_TIME)
    31-JAN-10 08.00.04.996 AMto my surprise the AWR reports are not being generated from 8 AM till now 8PM.
    What could be the reason ? Do I need to do any thing manual initiation ?
    Edited by: [email protected] on Feb 1, 2010 8:41 AM

    SELECT STARTUP_TIME     FROM DBA_HIST_SNAPSHOT WHERE STARTUP_TIME > TRUNC(SYSDATE);
    post results from SQL above

Maybe you are looking for