Compare transaction in sol_man

Hello all,
I have a question: is there a transaction in solution manager where I can have an overview for all the managed systems where I can filter for special attributes, like where was the last time the system was patched, or to compare 2 systems ( like spam compare)
thx
CHris

Im interested in a way to check from sol_man the OS patches.
I had thought more like “overview managed systems” in solman_setup, but no information about OS patches there. Something like a dashboard would be nice because otherwise we’d have to check every
system manually.
thx
chris

Similar Messages

  • Advanced comparison of form values in a transaction. Use "Compare Transaction Fields"?

    I have a form for textbook requests which has, among other fields, these:
    Campus Enrollment
    Current number of textbooks on campus
    Number requested in this instance
    I want to disallow form submissions where the {currentnumber}+{requestednumber}>{campusenrollment}
    In other words, if I say I have 500 students, and claim that I have 50 books already, then my max current request is 450.
    I have been experimenting with the "Compare Transaction Fields", but am not sure what I am doing.
    Any suggestions?

    Hi,
    I´m not certain if the "Compare Transaction Fields" behaviour allows such advanced calculations at all, but if it does, your formula -- at least according to my basic understanding of math :-) -- certainly needs to first add "currentnumber" to "requestednumber" and make this a "group", and then compare the grouped value to "campusenrollment" :
    ({currentnumber} + {requestednumber}) > {campusenrollment}
    Cheers,
    Günter Schenk
    Adobe Community Expert, Dreamweaver

  • Comparing transaction summary against target revenue values

    Hi,
    We have a powerpivot model that contains transactions and revenue amounts by year, quarter and product. Each product has a defined revenue target for each year and quarter, which are contained in a lookup table.
    We've created a pivot table that does a simple summary of total revenue of transactions, summarized by product, year and quarter. We want to also display a column that shows the target revenue for each product, by quarter and by year, which is available
    in our other table.
    We've been able to successfully "lookup" the target revenue values however, we are unable to get the information to aggregate successfully for each quarter/year and product due to the fact that it is pulling the target value for each transaction.
    Below is a mockup of a pivot table that we would like to see. We have been able to get the summary by quarter/product for each transaction really easy. What has proven to be challenging is getting the target revenue information to display. The closest result
    we have been able to achieve is by doing a lookup on the revenue target data and displaying the "max" value, which will correctly show the max by quarter. However, the subtotal and total amounts for the targets are using the max value, and thus not
    providing a sum of revenue targets for the product by year or by quarter. Thanks in advance for any help

    Nevermind, I was able to find an answer here:
    https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/7d06ff1b-04fd-496e-9286-4babd0c9beb9/lookup-from-aggregation?forum=sqlkjpowerpivotforexcel
    This solved my problem.

  • Compare Transaction

    hi,
    I have a "User Registration Data Edit" page.
    A user can, for example, change his username or email.
    I would like to check if the new data already exist between other user data.
    (no comparison between his data of course)
    Any solution?
    sorry for my english, hope you understand me
    Thanks
    Gabriele

    Sorry Günter,
    my brain is out of service...
    I follow your hint but
    3 values to check:
    username // this works
    email // this works
    password // this doesn't work, doesn't stop the transaction
    this is the trigger:
    //start Trigger_CheckUniquePassword trigger
    //remove this line if you want to edit the code by hand
    function Trigger_CheckUniquePassword(&$tNG) {
    $tblFldObj = new tNG_CheckUnique($tNG);
    $tblFldObj->setTable("db_user");
    $tblFldObj->addFieldName("password");
    $tblFldObj->setErrorMsg("Password già esistente");
    return $tblFldObj->Execute();
    //end Trigger_CheckUniquePassword trigger
    what I wrong?
    thanks
    Gabriele

  • NO ERROR message Compare 2 form fields

    Hi,
    i use ADDT. I have a form with an Insert Transaction (login_usr, userRegistration).
    I want to compare two E-mail fields (email_usr and email_usr2). To be sure people register their own e-mailadres). Only email_usr goes into the database.
    I managed with the server behavior Compare Transaction fields.
    But i don't see an error message like 'Check your e-mail adres' ??
    thanks!

    Hi,
    i use ADDT. I have a form with an Insert Transaction (login_usr, userRegistration).
    I want to compare two E-mail fields (email_usr and email_usr2). To be sure people register their own e-mailadres). Only email_usr goes into the database.
    I managed with the server behavior Compare Transaction fields.
    But i don't see an error message like 'Check your e-mail adres' ??
    thanks!

  • Why CO24 is not reliable transaction for me?

    Dear experts,
    I launch transaction CO24 to check the missing parts list. However, this transaction also gave me a big lists of materials that were not missing.
    Thus, I couldn't not fully trust this transaction. After the CO24 report, I have to check again all the materials(that are shown by co24) in MD04 to insure if all those parts were actually missing or not.  Every time, about 30% of materials were shown in the list which were not missing.
    I am desperetely looking for a report to "ONLY THOSE MATERIALS WHICH HAVE NEGATIVE STOCK" (minus sign) IN MD04  to be appeared in CO24. Is there any possibilities to get a report like this?
    Anything above that will be considered as bonus.
    Also, I am a new SAP user so please provide me a little more details if possible..
    Thank you in advance..
    wishes,
    Jeevan

    Hi Jeevan
    Transaction CO24 shows the results of the availability check and, according to the availability check, a material can be defined as missing part even if the stock is not yet negative.
    Basically, a material is considered as missing part according to the settings defined on transaction OPPJ for the check control and there are many elements considered, despite the stock.
    Also, you are comparing transaction MD04, which is a transactions that shows the stocks/requirements from the MRP perspective and this transaction cannot be compared with the availability check results, since the logic and the customizing is COMPLETELY different.
    This issue has been discussed hundreds of times on the forum, therefore, please search for old threads and documents related to the availability check for a better understanding of this functionality.
    If you want to see materials with negative available quantity, such as they are displayed on MD04, maybe you should try transaction MD07 and paly a little bit with the traffic lights.
    BR
    Caetano

  • Transaction Code Comparion in Different Versions

    Hi Folks,
        I have an requirement to compare transaction codes of different version and download it if there is any change.
    For example: lets say there is a transaction code XYZ in sap R/3 4.7 version the same XYZ transaction exists in SAP ECC also.
    But there are some changes in the tranction in the SAP ECC version. The changes are like they have added a new screen to it.
    I need to how to find out the changes if there is any.
    Thanks & Regards
    <LOCKED BY MODERATOR - DUPLICATED THREAD>
    Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Dec 14, 2009 4:07 PM

    Hi, 
    you can use comparing function in version management. it will tell you every change.
    good luck.
    Peter

  • Implementing badi in /sapapo/ccr

    Hi
    The requirement is to implement badi /SAPAPO/CIF_DELTA3 for Filtering of objects not relevant for the comparison (RELEVANT_FOR_COMPARE_APO). When this report runs for purchase requisition, we see error code 182. We do not want to see the error code 182 appearing for those Product locations (PRs) that are deliberately stopped from moving to R3.We are  maintaining a list of these Product location combinations in a custom table in APO. How this BADI will be implemented ?
    Thanks
    Manas

    Hi,
    CCR will try to compare transaction data of APO with ECC. Your developer needs to write the logic in BADI that for these product- location combination (mentioned in Z table) do not compare purchase requisitions.
    At the same time you need to stop these purchased requisitions coming from APO to ECC in the userexit :CIFPUR01
    EXIT_SAPLCPUR_001 (enhancement to change purchasing data (purchase requisitions, purchase orders) in ERP inbound)
    Thanks,
    Pavan Verma

  • RE: upgrade question

    Hello all,
    We are planning to upgrade our R34.7 system to ECC6.0.I performed the same upgrade in the past (ran 2a - 2d).
    Now this time we want to analyze before actually performing the upgrade to determine the number of
    transactions/authorization object, roles affected
    I would like to know how this can be achieved, below is my approach
    1.Download USOBT_C after upgrade (this table should be same as USOBT_C before upgrade)
    2.Perform 2a (This will include all the new authorization objects, values to existing transactions & new transactions to the USOBT_C & USOBT_X customer tables)
    3.Download USOBT_C after 2a.(this should be same as USOBT_C before 2a but it includes additional values, objects, transactions)
    4.step 2b(this will compare transactions modified  by customer to SAP default check indicators)
    5.Now my approach was to compare USOBT_C before 2a and USOBT after 2a (for only transactions shown in step 2b) This should capture all the changes.
    (our intention was to keep old values and leave the table USOBT_C same as before for the transactions shown)
    is the above approach correct? or what if i compare the USOBT_C with USOBT after 2a or compare USOBT_C to USOBT before 2a?
    Thanks in advance,
    Sun
    Edited by: sun on Jun 26, 2011 11:54 PM

    I'm almost positive you can do this, because your monthly bills and service are through Verizon instead of Amazon, but I would make sure to read everything Amazon has you sign very thoroughly first. I know most 3rd party retailers do not allow you to make changes to your account for 181 days after upgrading with them. Almost all have their own contracts you must abide by as well as Verizon's.
    I believe I saw somewhere that this can be done, but you have to contact Verizon after upgrading with Amazon and have them re-add the discount to your account.

  • Validate 2 E-mail address fields in insert record form

    Hello,
    I have used the Insert Record Form Wizard to create a form, including using the Validate Form Server Behavior to validate many fields.
    I can't figure out how to compare & validate 2 E-mail address fields.
    After the form was created I opened the existing Validate Form Server Behavior - Advanced tab and built the condition {sub_email2} != {sub_email} but this had no affect on submitting the form.
    The other thing I tried was creating a new Compare Transaction Field behavior with the same condition {sub_email2} != {sub_email}, this also seemed to have no affect.
    I am just a beginner, so I admit to not really knowing what I'm doing, for me ADDT has been a great aid.
    The other thing I noticed, when I tried both the items above, besides not affecting being able to submit the form with different E-mail addresses. The red asterisks indicating a required field, would disappear.
    Here is the form http://www.oescahealthregistry.org/forms/pedigree_submission.php this version of the form does NOT include either of my attempts to validate the E-mail fields.
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Dennis

    Hi,
    A compare statement should work fine. As an example I made small form that inserts name and email (2 fields) using Insert record wizard.
    Name field is required, email field is required and checks that its a valid email structure ([email protected]). I then finish the wizard.
    <input type="text" name="email" id="email" value="<?php echo KT_escapeAttribute($row_rsemail['email']); ?>" size="32" />
    <?php echo $tNGs->displayFieldHint("email");?> <?php echo $tNGs->displayFieldError("email", "email"); ?>
    I then add the extra field to the form that the 2nd email will be entered into, this one I called email2, I then copied the display hint and fielderror code from the first email and placed it behind the 2nd email box and changed the text to reflect email2. Which probably doesnt matter but I put it there anyway.
    <input name="email2" type="text" id="email2" size="32" />
    <?php echo $tNGs->displayFieldHint("email2");?> <?php echo $tNGs->displayFieldError("email2", "email2"); ?>
    Now that I have both email fields in the form, I go to the developer tools under server behavior and select compare transactions fields under form validation.
    I hit the + to add a field I then choose email for field, then == for condition, then {POST.email2} for compare to. I enter in an error message and hit ok.
    Thats it the form is ready.
    The first email field will check against email validation and the 2nd email will check against the first email.
    I hope that helps.
    Take note that the database actually only has 2 fields to enter data. Then 2nd email field is only for validation.
    Message was edited by: Albert S.

  • SU25 Issue

    Hello Friends,
    Currently I am doing Security Upgrade (4.6C to ECC 6.0). In Step 2B of SU25 (Compare Transactions) I need to Adjust the New Authority Objects thrown. Does any one give me an approach on how to Carry on this Activity.
    As if now What I can think about is :
    1) Accept SAP proposal as it is  Or
    2) Send the List of modified Tcodes to Business and get the Information.
    3) Take a call on Technical tcodes involving Security and Basis folks.
    Can any one suggest me a better Approach to expediate this process? Please feel free to share your experiances.
    Thanks a lot!!

    Hi Sachin - I was in similar situation few backs, what we did is we maintained new objects with least authority. For IS or Basis Auth objects I researched on SAP sites and assigned low critical authorization.
    On business side, I involved BA's in helping me understand the terminology to maintain new objects. I saw many times SU53 pulling incorrect data when business roles are concerned. I would say it will be risky to take your call on business roles though you will not see big deal on IS side of roles.
    i did not automatically inherited new auth objects in SU25 but pulled the list of roles effected and individually maintained it.
    Thanks!

  • Any transaction where you can compare the performance of 2 programs

    Hi all,
    is there any transaction where we can check/compare the performance of 2 programs.
    please help.
    thanks in advance.

    Hi
    Use Se30 (runtime analysis) for both the programs one by one .
    Neha

  • Comparing and Asjusting data b/w two systems using SCU0 Transaction

    I need to compare and adjust data between two systems for tables T006 , T006A  . I am using Transaction SCU0 for comparison . It is giving me comparison results  , but  coz of some reason Button for adjusting data is not active for me .
    If I do the same thing using SM30 ,  Adjust button is coming after comparison  . I don't have maintinance views available for these tables otherwise i would have used SM30 . I want to do that using SCU0 only . Any idea how can I make  Adjust button active  .
    Regards

    Hi,
    Welcome to SDN !!!
    I would suggest you to please contact your BASIS Team. They will Activate the button for you.
    Thanks,
    Chidanand

  • Comparing schema in pe01 transaction

    I have compared the schemaTm00 and schema TMF2 in pe01 transaction manually they are not same. Compared schemaTM00 and schema TMP2 in pe01 transaction manually are not same.
    requirement is that if if schemaTM00 is disable, it will not affect processing of TMP2 and TMF2. please tell me how to check schemas TMP2 and TMF2  both are not calling any program from TM00.
    please reply me what i have to do

    >>requirement is that if if schemaTM00 is disable
    Not sure wht you meant by disable.. are you going to delete the schema? not advisable.
    The functioning of TMP2/TMF2 schemas ( re they Std? thedy don't exist on my 47 system) will be impacted by the non-availability of TM00, only if TM00 is a subschema ( which it  is not ) that gets called from TMP2/TMF2.
    Honestly, I didn't understand what you are trying to do.
    ~Suresh

  • Financial accounting comparative analysis Transaction F.03 "inconsistence"

    Dear all, we just checked out over transaction F.03 that we have inconsistencies
    between accounts receivables on the basis of customer line item (transaction FBL5N),
    G/L account line item (transaction FBL3N) and report S_ALR_87012284 which shows the balances of the period on the sales account and on the accounts receivables.
    Background for this "inconsistence" was a "retrobilling"-transaction (VFRB) which
    caused an error in SM13 (but no ABAP-Dump or similar....).
    1) For some document numbers SAP was able to create document numbers and entries in BKPF und BSEG
    2) Unfortunately BSID und BSIS were not created ==> means that we did not get a proper view in FBL5N for the accounts receivable-entry and we did not get a proper view in FBL3N for the G/L sales-account.
    3) one FI-consultant went then in the system and changed the documents with transaction FB02 - he just added a dot in the field ZUONR
    4) All lines arised then in FBL3N and FBL5N (I thought everything is fine now....)
    5) No we checked with transaction F.03 that on the balance-side that the summary of the amount of this documents is too high on the balance of the sales account and on the G/L accounts-receivable-account is to high, the sub-ledger for the customer seems to be fine!
    Could anybody give me a hint what to do?
    Is there maybe a report which creates again the balances in the current period out from the item-lines?
    Txs in advance whoever can help me!

    Hallo Andreas, vielen Dank für Deinen Input
    Zur Situation ist folgendes zu sagen:
    Wie gesagt ist das ganze aus der VFRB (Nachverrechnung) entstanden, wobei
    ich es nicht zusammengebracht habe, aus SM13 heraus nachzubuchen - es ist ein einziger Satz drinnen, wobei das System einen "Fehler beim Lesen von VBHDR" zurückgibt...
    Wir konnten diese Sätze nicht nachbuchen ==> das Arge dabei war, dass Gutschriften erstellt wurden, die wurden in die BKPF und auch BSEG gebucht, allerdings nicht in die Sekundärindizes (BSIS, BSID).... - d.h. sowohl in der Darstellung von FBL5N (Debiorenposten) und FBL3N (am Erlöskonto) waren diese Belegnummern nicht dargestellt.
    Habe im OSS gesucht und bin auf keinen grünen Zweig gekommen, da die Meldungen, die ich gefunden habe, sich zwar beispielsweise mit Inkonsistenzen zwischen BKPF und BSEG beschäftigt haben, aber habe nichts gefunden, was auf ein Nichtvorhandensein der BSIS und BSID hinweist.
    Wie auch immer ==> unser FI-Consultant ist dann einfach in den Beleg mittels FB02 reingegangen, hat auf der ZUONR einen weiteren Punkt gesetzt und plötzlich waren die Sekundärindizes erstellt ==> so weit so gut.
    Leider sind wir erst gestern über die F.03 draufgekommen, dass nun die Salden für das Erlöskonto als auch für das betroffene Forderungskonto genau um die Summe des Betrages dieser Belege zu hoch sind (ich nehme an, dass ein Programm oder Funktionsbaustein 2x die Salden hochgezogen hat - ist aber reine Vermutung...)
    Ich muß gestehen, dass ich mich auf der Baustelle nur bedingt auskenne, die GLT0 habe ich gestern zum ersten Mal aufgerufen ==> ich nehme an, dass das die Saldotabelle ist ==> beim Forderungskonto konnte ich auch herausfinden, dass der S/H-Betrag dem Betrag gem. S_ALR_87012284 entspricht...
    OSS-Call habe ich übrigens gestern nacht schon aufgegeben, hoffe, das SAP mich da unterstützen kann.
    Vielen Dank für Deinen Input und lg

Maybe you are looking for