Condition type value can not be changed in PO pricing

I have created PO which is having pricing procedure consisting different condition type. When i create any subsequent document (MIGO or MIRO) and realized that condition value in the pricing need to be changed so I have reversed all subsequent document so that can carry out "update pricing".
when i press Update pricing button on the condition tab, its showing message that new pricing can not be carried out. I observed that some condition types of pricing are grayed out.
Kindly help to solve this problem. Kindly help me how to 1) update pricing or 2) can change value of condition type.
answers will be rewarded

Hi shiwanshu
Actually i tried the same and could change after I have reversed all subsequent documents
Since your system does't allow you change and since you have reversed all the subsequent docs why dont you delete the PO item and add a new one with right pricing..
i guess it will solve your problem..
Hope helps
Best Regards
Reward please if found useful

Similar Messages

Pricing : Condition type value need tog get from the lowest of 4 other cond

Hi,
I have one requirement in one pricing procedure.
I need to calculate condition value of one condition type from the lowest value of other 4 condition tyeps. These condition types values are not defined as a subtotal.
So if I decide to write a formula on condition values, is there
any way to select these values and choose the lowest of them?
Please also advice if there is any other way such as condition exclusion
or so?
Thanks and regards,
Anand

Anand,
As you have mentioned you can use condition exclusion for such a requirement.
here is a detailed description of how you can achieve this: use the menu path IMG> Sales & Distribution> Basic Functions> Pricing> Condition Exclusion> Condition exclusion for group of conditions.
When you execute this IMG acitivity you get a window with three options
1.Define Condition Exclusion Groups
2.Assign condition types to the exclusion groups
3.Maintain condition exclusion for pricing procedures
We will use these three options one by one, we start with the first
1. Define an exclusion group, lets say EX01 and give a description
2 Assign the four condition types that you want to compare to this exclusion group under this option
   lets say EX01 ZK01
               EX01 ZK02
               EX01 ZK03
               EX01 Zk04
3. under this third step, select the pricing procedure that you are working on and from the left margin click on 'Exclusion'. click on 'New Entries' and make the following entries (example)
         Sno.   Cpr         ExGr1
          10      A            EX01                leave ExGr2 blank, Save your entries
Check if your purpose has been met or not. Do give your feedback
Regards,
PATHIK

Puzzling condition type value

I am puzzled by this scenario
In the sales pricing procedure there is a condition type(for the sake of simplicity let's call it zabcd), this condition type has been assigned a routine in the column Alternative Condition base value (VOFM>Formulas>Condition base value)
This condition type(via abap code/routine) is picking the value of a condition record of condition type zefgh. My head went spinning when this condition type (zefgh) was not even found in the pricing procedure.
I was always under the impression that for a condition type's value to be picked up it necessarily had to exist in the pricing procedure. Am I wrong somewhere? Please correct me.
How can zabcd pick the value of condtion record of zefgh when zefgh is not at all present in the pricing procedure.I am puzzled by this scenario In the sales pricing procedure there is a condition type(for the sake of simplicity lets call it zabcd), this condition type has been assigned a routine in the column
Alternative Condition base value (VOFM>Formulas>Condition base value)
My question:
This condition type zabcd(via abap code/routine) is picking the value of a condition record of condition type zefgh. My head went spinning when this condition type (zefgh) was not even found in the pricing procedure. I was always under the impression that for a condition type's value to be picked up it necessarily had to exist in the pricing procedure.
Am I wrong somewhere? Please correct me.
How can zabcd pick the value of condtion record of zefgh when zefgh is not at all present in the pricing procedure.
Thanks,

With condition supplement, you can have values of condition types populating in your sales order, for cond types NOT in your pricing procedure.
The business example for this could be -
With PR00 (price) you shall always give KA00; thus in pricing procedure your give PR00 & NOT KA00, but you see the value of KA00 too.
To not include KA00 everytime in the pricing procedure concept of condition supplement is used.
KA00 is included in the pricing procedure assigned to PR00. So check in your condition type V/06, field "Pricing procedure". Then go to V/08 and go into that pricing procedure and search for ZEFG cond type.

Purchase order one particular condition type vale should not inventorised

Dear All,
I have a scenario in the purchase order particular one condition type value should not get inventorised that should goes to a seperate account. it should not added with material cost
i have created a seperate condition type ZZ01
with condition class : A - Discount or surcharge
calcualtion type : A - Percentage
and i have attached this condition type to pricing procedure in accurals i have maintained a seperate posting transaction.
the amount is getting posted against the accural transaction event key.
but its getting inventorised with material cost it should not get inventorised..
what is the procedure...
Regards
Anand.
Edited by: Anandhakumar Palanisamy on Mar 24, 2010 1:17 PM

Hi..
I have maintained for this condition type Accurals in M/06
and i have maintained the Statistical tick mark in pricing procedure..
but its getting inventorised...
it should not inventorised...
any other solution...
Regards
P.Anandhakumar

CF9 Problems with Select * query, resulting in Value can not be converted to requested type.

So, I work on a legacy CF web site and there are numerous SELECT * FROM USERS_TABLE queries all over the site.
Well, we changed the structure of said table in the database on our Testing and Staging sites, with no issues.
When we pushed up to our production environment and changed the structure of the production DB table, the server kept kicking back "Value can not be converted to requested type."
After doing some searching out there, it looks like CF caches the structure of the table, and you either have to restart CF to clear it, or rename and then name-back the DSN to fix the issue.
http://www.bennadel.com/blog/194-ColdFusion-Query-Error-Value-Can-Not-Be-Converted-To-Requ ested-Type.htm
That said, this doesn't happen in our testing and staging environments - so what would be the difference?
Is there some setting I need to change in the CF Admin to keep this from happening again?

Also, if you can use a Stored Procedure to retrieve the data, do so. Standard queries gets all the information, anyway, chokes bandwidth passing it all to the CF server, and forces the CF server to filter, sort, and format the data. SPs tell the db server to get ONLY the data requested, and forces the db server to filter and sort the data, leaving only formatting to the CF server.
That's not true. The only time CF messes with data returned from the DB is if there's a maxrows attribute, and the record set returnded from the DB has more than that number of records... which causes CF to truncate the recordset to the correct size before returning it. The DB might or might not stop sending rows down to CF after CF says "yeah, I've got all I want now".
Other than that, for all intents and purposes all CF does with the SQL is pass it to the DB and wait for an answer. The only thing it does to the returned data is to create a CF record set ("query") with it... this does not involve any filtering and sorting.
Adam

MM Pricing Condition Type values in Condition Tab updation while CHANGE PO.

Hi,
The process of PO creation and PO change is through inbound IDOC posting.
I created a PO with configured MM pricing procedure.
While creating PO, the PO is created as required with different Condition Type value break-ups [PBXX, Discount, Surcharge etc] in the PO as required via Inbound IDOC processing.
While CHANGING the same PO, the Condition Type break-ups [i.e. pricing related values] in the PO are NOT changing in the PO via Inbound IDOC processing.
What needs to be done to update the Condition Type break-ups in the PO while changing PO through IDOC processing process?
This problem is not occured while manual / on-line changing of PO valueS and saving the PO & exists through IDOC processing method ONLY.
Thanks in Adv,
RK

Hi
Try this function module
FM RV_CHECK_CONDITION_VALUE
Regards
Hareesh Menon

How to change the manual condition type value in change sales order BAPI

Hi All,
My scenario here is, i want to either add/change the manual condition type value during change of SO.
When i'm trying to pass the order_conditions_in and order_conditions_inx tables in 'BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE'.
Condition type is coming at item level but the value is setting to zero. Pls. help if anyone has any idea how to handle this.

Siva,
I guess you posted in Wrong Thread. You need to post in WAS section.
check for any BAPI's available in CRM.
Nagesh Ganisetti.

Condition type value not update in sales order

Hello Guru's
As per the sales order in VA01 the condition type value i.e surcharge value is not updating in sales order.
But I have maintain the condition record(Surcharge)also and in Condition technique I have checked every thing is correct .
please find below I have attached the Screen short .
Please give me solution Asap.

Hi Sukdev,
Have you checked the respective pricing procedure for From and To reference step maintained against the condition type ZSUR?
Regards,
T.R.S.Praveen

Exception --- Value can not be converted to requested type.Error Code: 0

Inside my query, I try to use function,like
Expression formattedRegDateCol = regDateCol.getFunction("to_char", "YYYY/MM/DD");
sometimes query works fine and sometimes got following exception, can anyone here help me out..
Internal Exception: java.sql.SQLException: [BEA][Oracle JDBC Driver]Value can not be converted to requested type.Error Code: 0
Call:SELECT COUNT(*), to_char(REG_DATE, 'YYYY/MM/DD') FROM SYSTEM_DETAIL WHERE ((REG_DATE BETWEEN {ts '2008-08-10 00:00:00.0'} AND {ts '2008-09-30 23:59:59.0'}) AND (GEOGRAPHIC_ID = 104)) GROUP BY to_char(REG_DATE, 'YYYY/MM/DD') ORDER BY to_char(REG_DATE, 'YYYY/MM/DD') ASC
Query:ReportQuery(com.cad.registration.RegistrationDetailImpl)
     at com.cad.report.data.DocumentReturnedDataGenImpl.loadData(DocumentReturnedDataGenImpl.java:130)
     at com.cad.report.data.AbstractDataGen.getReport(AbstractDataGen.java:96)
     at com.cad.report.command.ProcessReportRequestOnMessage.run(ProcessReportRequestOnMessage.java:74)
     at com.cad.registration.command.AbstractCommand.execute(AbstractCommand.java:106)
     at com.cad.flow.core.Run.run(Unknown Source)
     at com.cad.flow.core.WorkflowComponent.run(Unknown Source)
     at com.cad.flow.ejbs.WorkflowManagerBean.execute(WorkflowManagerBean.java:238)
     at com.cad.flow.ejbs.WorkflowManagerBean.execute(WorkflowManagerBean.java:135)
     at com.cad.flow.ejbs.WorkflowManager_uh667k_EOImpl.execute(WorkflowManager_uh667k_EOImpl.java:132)
     at com.cad.flow.ejbs.WorkflowManager_uh667k_EOImpl_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at weblogic.rmi.internal.ServerRequest.sendReceive(ServerRequest.java:174)
     at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableRemoteRef.invoke(ClusterableRemoteRef.java:335)
     at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableRemoteRef.invoke(ClusterableRemoteRef.java:252)
     at com.cad.flow.ejbs.WorkflowManager_uh667k_EOImpl_1001_WLStub.execute(Unknown Source)
     at com.cad.util.WorkflowProxy.runWorkflow(WorkflowProxy.java:128)
     at com.cad.kbd.messenger.listener.mdb.ReportRequestMDB.onMessage(ReportRequestMDB.java:84)
     at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.execute(MDListener.java:466)
     at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.transactionalOnMessage(MDListener.java:371)
     at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.onMessage(MDListener.java:327)
     at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.onMessage(JMSSession.java:4072)
     at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.execute(JMSSession.java:3964)
     at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession$UseForRunnable.run(JMSSession.java:4490)
     at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:464)
     at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:200)
     at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
Caused by: Exception [TOPLINK-4002] (Oracle TopLink - 10g Release 3 (10.1.3.3.0) (Build 070620)): oracle.toplink.exceptions.DatabaseException
Internal Exception: java.sql.SQLException: [BEA][Oracle JDBC Driver]Value can not be converted to requested type.Error Code: 0
Call:SELECT COUNT(*), to_char(REG_DATE, 'YYYY/MM/DD') FROM SYSTEM_DETAIL WHERE ((REG_DATE BETWEEN {ts '2008-08-10 00:00:00.0'} AND {ts '2008-09-30 23:59:59.0'}) AND (GEOGRAPHIC_ID = 104)) GROUP BY to_char(REG_DATE, 'YYYY/MM/DD') ORDER BY to_char(REG_DATE, 'YYYY/MM/DD') ASC
Query:ReportQuery(com.cad.registration.RegistrationDetailImpl)
     at oracle.toplink.exceptions.DatabaseException.sqlException(DatabaseException.java:282)
     at oracle.toplink.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseAccessor.getObject(DatabaseAccessor.java:988)
     at oracle.toplink.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseAccessor.fetchRow(DatabaseAccessor.java:780)
     at oracle.toplink.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseAccessor.basicExecuteCall(DatabaseAccessor.java:562)
     at oracle.toplink.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseAccessor.executeCall(DatabaseAccessor.java:441)
     at oracle.toplink.threetier.ServerSession.executeCall(ServerSession.java:457)
     at oracle.toplink.internal.queryframework.DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.executeCall(DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.java:117)
     at oracle.toplink.internal.queryframework.DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.executeCall(DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.java:103)
     at oracle.toplink.internal.queryframework.DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.executeSelectCall(DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.java:174)
     at oracle.toplink.internal.queryframework.DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.selectAllRows(DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.java:481)
     at oracle.toplink.internal.queryframework.ExpressionQueryMechanism.selectAllRowsFromTable(ExpressionQueryMechanism.java:825)
     at oracle.toplink.internal.queryframework.ExpressionQueryMechanism.selectAllReportQueryRows(ExpressionQueryMechanism.java:791)
     at oracle.toplink.queryframework.ReportQuery.executeDatabaseQuery(ReportQuery.java:518)
     at oracle.toplink.queryframework.DatabaseQuery.execute(DatabaseQuery.java:620)
     at oracle.toplink.queryframework.ObjectLevelReadQuery.execute(ObjectLevelReadQuery.java:779)
     at oracle.toplink.queryframework.ReadAllQuery.execute(ReadAllQuery.java:451)
     at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.Session.internalExecuteQuery(Session.java:2089)
     at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.Session.executeQuery(Session.java:993)
     at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.Session.executeQuery(Session.java:965)
     at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.Session.executeQuery(Session.java:878)
     at com.cad.persistence.toplink.TopLinkPersistenceBrokerImpl.executeQuery(TopLinkPersistenceBrokerImpl.java:420)
     at com.cad.report.data.DocumentSys.getSummitedDocumentNumber(DocumentSys.java:332)
     at com.cad.report.data.DocumentSys.loadData(DocumentSys.java:110)
     ... 24 more
Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: [BEA][Oracle JDBC Driver]Value can not be converted to requested type.
     at weblogic.jdbc.base.BaseExceptions.createException(Unknown Source)
     at weblogic.jdbc.base.BaseExceptions.getException(Unknown Source)
     at weblogic.jdbc.base.BaseData.getTimestamp(Unknown Source)
     at weblogic.jdbc.base.BaseResultSet.getTimestamp(Unknown Source)
     at weblogic.jdbc.wrapper.ResultSet_weblogic_jdbc_base_BaseResultSet.getTimestamp(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.toplink.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseAccessor.getObjectThroughOptimizedDataConversion(DatabaseAccessor.java:1038)
     at oracle.toplink.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseAccessor.getObject(DatabaseAccessor.java:942)
     ... 45 more

Here is my code
ExpressionBuilder builder = new ExpressionBuilder();
ReportQuery query = new ReportQuery(RegistrationDetailImpl.class, builder);
query.addArgument("startTime");
query.addArgument("endTime");
query.addArgument("lro");
Expression lroCol = builder.get("lro");
Expression regDateCol = builder.get(
QueryConstants.RegistrationDetailQueryConstants.REGISTRATION_NUMBER_COL).get(
QueryConstants.RegistrationDetailQueryConstants.REGISTRATION_DATE_COL);
Expression formattedRegDateCol = regDateCol.getFunction("to_char", "YYYY/MM/DD");
Expression timeExp = regDateCol.between(builder.getParameter("startTime"), builder
.getParameter("endTime"));
Expression lroExp = lroCol.equal(builder.getParameter("lro"));
query.setSelectionCriteria(timeExp.and(lroExp));
query.addCount();
query.addAttribute("regDate", formattedRegDateCol);
query.addGrouping(formattedRegDateCol);
query.addOrdering(formattedRegDateCol.ascending());
descriptor.getDescriptorQueryManager().addQuery("testquery", query);

The class of the deferred-methods return type "{0}" can not be found.

I am developing a multilingual portal application.
I have the method that changes the locale based on user's choice in the bean and the method is being referred to as below.
<af:selectOneChoice label="Select Language" autoSubmit="true"
value="#{localeBean.locale}"
valueChangeListener="localeBean.changeLocale">
<af:selectItem label="English" value="en" id="si1"/>
<af:selectItem label="French" value="fr" id="si2"/>
<af:selectItem label="Dutch" value="nl" id="si3"/>
</af:selectOneChoice>
when i try to run the application, i am getting compile time errors as below,
The class of the deferred-methods return type "{0}" can not be found.
No property editor found for the bean "javax.el.MethodExpression".
After going through the discussion forums i learned that the compilation errors can be resolved by setting the <jsp:directive.page deferredSyntaxAllowedAsLiteral="false> at the starting of the page.
Even after that i am getting the compilation error.
Any solutions, suggestions or possible approaches would be helpful as i am new to Webcenter Portal development.
Thanks,

The error you get points to a problem on the page (somewhere). Switch to source mode and check the right margin if you see orange or red marks. These are pointing to problems (not all are show stoppers, but they give you hints that something is not according to the standard for jsf, jsff, jsp or jspx pages.
Have you checked that the bean is correctly defined and that it's reachable?
Start a fresh page and isolate the problem, e.g. build a selectOneChoiuce on the new page (don't copy it as you might copy the error too) and make it work on the new page. Once you have it running you can compare the solution to your not running page.
Timo

Condition type which can be selected by F4 in PO.

Hi freinds..
once again need ur help!
i have created a condition typeZHDG (m/06) maintained the same in pricing procedure(m/08) , now the problem is while creating PO that condition type automatically fetchs some value and needs to amended each time which is creating problem for end users.
i want , ZHDG condition type should not apear in PO , if user required that condition type they can select that condition type by using F4 in condition tag.
pls help....
regards
Rashmi.

Check the following and see if it helps you:
first go to m/06 and in the condition type enter C for Manual entries.also in m/08 against the condition type maintain the checkbox for manual entry only.
spro@mm@purchasing@enviornment data@define default values for buyer@settings for default values@here either create a new one say Z1 or use the standard one i.e. 01@double click on Z1/01@select Price Adoptation tab@select Do not copy and then save.
now go to SU01/SU3@enter your user id@go to Parameters tab@here enter Parameter id as EVO,value as Z1/01 and save.
Now check by creating a new PO.
regards,
indranil

How to stop non statistical condition type value from updating total amount

Gurus,
Can any body explain me how to do following setting,
How to Stop non statistical condition type value from updating Total Amount
Regards,
Sai

Dear Sai,
You need to make that condition type as Statistical one
Go to SPRO - Sales and Distr. - Basic Functions - Pricing - Define and Assign Pricing Proc - Maintain Pricing Proc - Control Date
Select the proc. - select the condition type and activate the check box Statistical
This will show the amount of the condition but will not consider for the net value calculation
Hope this will help you
regards,
Sagar

MM Condition Types values flow COPA

Dear Gurus,
My client requirement is MM Condition Types Values Should flow to COPA like SD to COPA. I had seen a screen that KE4IM is there we can map our COPA Value Field and MM Condition Types. But I am not sure that values flow to COPA, Because No document will be generated in FI or other while doing PO.
Pl suggest me how can I fullfill this requirement.
Regards,
Balaji Bhonsle.

Hi,
If you read config doco for KE4IM you will find a statement:
"It is also possible to transfer conditions from MM to update billing data in pooled payment in the IS Retail system. These are transferred according to the same rules as SD conditions."
So KE4IM is only used in IS Retail. Are you IS Retail?
If not you probably want to bring conditions from purchase orders to CO-PA.
I agree with Ajay except for point 1.
You can actualy trigger CO-PA posting during goods receipt (and invoice receipt) for PO.
In order to achive it you need to activate "Purchase Accounting" in MM.
SPRO -> Marterials Management -> Valuation and Account Assignment -> Account Determination -> Account Determination without Wizard -> Purchase Account Management
Please read doco for Purchasing Account. In a nutshell when you activate it system will post addtional line item for GR and IR:
Purchasing account and Purchasing Offseting account for value of purchased nmaterial and also for delivery costs.
In table T030: Purchase account(EIN), purchase offsetting account (EKG), freight purchase account (FRE).
Define EIN and FRE as cost elements and map to profitability segment in OKB9. Leave EKG as P&L account (no cost element).
Then map cost elements to value fields in COPA.
Done.
Cheers,
Szymon

Problem in 2007 :----MasterData Type UserTable can not add row

hi all
i have create a "masterline" UDT.
In 2005 i have written a code to insert data in that table.
eg..
SAPbobsCOM.UserTable UDT;
UDT=Company.UserTables.Item("TableName");
UDT.Code ="ABC";
UDT.Name ="1";
UDT.UserFields.Fields.Item("U_USNM").Value ="XYZ";
int nErr=UDT.Add();
In "2005" it working fine but in "2007" it gives exception "MasterData Type UserTable can not add row"
Regards,
Rajesh Saini
Edited by: Rajesh Saini on Feb 5, 2008 2:21 PM

Hi Rajesh,
What kind of User Data Table is your table? MasterData, Document or NoObject?
I have tested and the error shows only when you are trying to fill a table of type MasterData or Document. For tables of type "NoObject" it works fine.
The only UDTs that you should fill by using UserTable object are the ones of type "NoObject". AddOns that want to be certified cannot update UDO tables (only via UI API for the moment).
But you are right in version 2005 SP01 it worked fine. I'll ask development whether it has been changed deliberately in B1 2007 or it is a problem.
Thanks for sharing this information with us, it is very important in order to improve the quality of the final version.
Regards
Trinidad.

JMOD condition type value should be always rounded up instead of commercial

Hi Helpers,
I need one clarification from you all based on your expertise,
1. JMOD condition type value should be always rounded up instead of commercial.
2. i have been already made rounding up in the condition type JMOD in the transaction V/06. but unfortunatly not working.
3. after that we found that there is configuration change in spro (company code setting in the indai taxation-CIN) in the Logistic general> tax on goods movement>india> basic setting> company code setting for the commercialrounding, but the same is already ennabled with SD rounding IND.
Need your expertise on this.How shall we make it round up always for JMOD condition value. below is an example for your further analysis.
Example: if values UTXJ is : 8,913.40 and JMOD will be calculated based on UTXJ as 10% thats is 891.34.
Actually this should be 892 as per the requiremen.t

I just recently rolled off a project in Europe that had an issue similar to this. We were having rounding issues as a result of % discounts.
However, we did come up with a solution that is provided by SAP.
Please review OSS note 80183 on SAP rounding and the solutions provided within the note.
I hope this helps.
Kind Regards,
Jason

Condition type value can not be changed in PO pricing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for