Condition which not restricts

Hi !
i did wrote a simple query the following,
SELECT * FROM RDR1 T0 Inner
join ITM1 T1 on T0.itemcode = T1.itemcode WHERE T1.[PriceList] =
2 and T0.[Price] < T1.[Price]
But the result seems it is not restricted according to the condn.
it also retreives the records which holds the price equal to the list price.
helpless now...
any there to lit light?
THNX.

Dear Zen,
Your query is giving the correct result as per the condition used in the query.
You can run the following query to verify the result.
SELECT T0.[Price],T1.[Price],* FROM RDR1 T0 Inner
join ITM1 T1 on T0.itemcode = T1.itemcode WHERE T1.[PriceList] =
2 and T0.[Price] < T1.[Price]
Regards,
Rakesh Pati
SAP Business One Forum Team

Similar Messages

  • HT201407 I have problem with My IPhone after updating I was asked to enter password etc then asked to agree the terms and conditions which I did but nothing happens it stays on this page can someone help how to complete the last stage of updating?

    I updated my I Phone4 with the latest version iOS7 after updating I was asked to enter I tune password etc and then was asked to accept the terms and conditions which I did......but nothing happens it stays on the same unable to complete the final stage.....my phone does not work I am stuffed can someone help.....cannot get thru to Apple I tried contacting them

    Hi Rajvidya Das,
    Do the following, then try again:
    1.     Close all open apps: Double click on the Home key and then swipe up on each of the thumbnails that appear above the open app icons
    2.     Sign out of the iTunes store: Settings>iTunes & App Store, click on your Apple/iTunes ID, then sign out
    3.     Check Settings>Safari, and make sure that "Block Cookies" is not set to "Always". If it is, change it to either of the other two options
    4.     Make sure you do not have Restrictions turned on. If they are turned on, make sure that access is allowed for Safari, iTunes Store, Installing Apps, and Deleting Apps
    5.     Reset your device (nothing will be lost): Hold down the Home and Power buttons at the same time and continue to hold them down until the Silver Apple appears (up to 30 seconds). Once the Home screen redisplays sign back into iTunes and try again
    Cheers,
    GB

  • Pricing: New condition type not getting listed in options in product master

    Hi,
    I have created a new pricing procedure and also created a new condition type for it. I am trying to create a condition record in the product master for this  condition type but the condition is not there in the list of conditions. How can I inlcude it in the condition list?
    Even the new condition type I have created by copying 0PR0 is not getting listed in the options, whereas 0PR0 is getting listed.
    Regards,
    Meenakshi
    Edited by: Meenakshi Sawhney on Sep 9, 2010 8:27 AM
    Edited by: Meenakshi Sawhney on Sep 9, 2010 8:29 AM

    Hi Meenakshi,
    you need to enhance the condition maintenance group in the customizing, which is assigned to the product master. Please check: IMG: Customer Relationship Management -> Master Data -> Products -> Special Settings for Sales Operations -> Assign Condition Group to Application CRM and IMG: Customer Relationship Management -> Master Data -> Conditions and Condition Technique -> Condition Technique: Basics -> Create Maintenance Group.
    Best Regards,
    Michael

  • Price and Pricing conditions are not copied to PO for a line item !!

    Hi
    I have created a PO w.r.t a PR which has only one line item.
    Now, I add another line item to this existing PO, i get an error message that the Price and Pricing conditions are not copied.
    How do i rectify this error !!
    Where might be the link for this Price and Pricing conditions to get copied in to this PO ??
    MaruthiRam

    What kind of PR and in the PO same material you enter for new line or new material and do you have any funcitonal authorization assigned o your user id
    please reply

  • Sales Condition, but not totalling to net value in SO

    Hello,
    We have costs which we need to post to certain GL accounts, to do this I created new condition type (not have statistical ticked in procedure). This is for royalty process, whereby every SO which we sell to every customers, we will pay 3% of sales to another party.
    - Problem, if dont tick statistical, wrong values get posted to customer because we're adding 3% to credit customer.
    - If tick statistical, values dont get transfered to accounting.
    Is there any better way we can use to not allow values to be totalled into net value in SO, but still be able to bill and post to accounting?

    You can achieve this requirement by creating New Condition Type ( suppose XYZ ) with Calculation Type as Percentage & Plus/minus as -ve . Add this Condition Type below the Condition Type for Royalty Process (suppose ABC ) with Step Number as the one of  Condition Type ABC in From Column in the Pricing Procedure.
    You would have to mention the Account key for Condition Type ABC & maintain 100 % Condition Record for Condition type XYZ & no Account key should be assigned against Condition Type XYZ.
    Best Regards,
    Ankur

  • Condition type not coming in sales order

    Hi,
    we have a condition type Z026. The issue is that  it is not set in the order but the condition records exists. The pricing analysis shows that condition reocrd is missing but the fact is the condition record is there. The acess seq is Z026 and there are many tables in the acess sequence.
    The first table in the access seq is 906 and the condition record exists but still the system says that the condition record is not found using  cond preliminary step (header fields like customer/sales org/div). the cond record is maintained for  relevant sales org/dist channel/customer/material. cond preliminary step means that system first looks for the header fields but everything is there.
    The condition is active and the conditon is created on 21.7.10 with validitity from 21.7.10 to 31.1.2010 and the pricing date in sales order is 27.7.10. so everyhting is fine but yet the condition is not coming in sales order
    what could be the issue.
    regds

    Hi,
    Now try creating a sales order with 20.07.2010 as the pricing date. It will work. Create another order with 21.07.2010 and it will not work. If so, it is due to the validity date. When you give 21.07.2010 as validity date and there is already another record which was valid on that date, the gap of one day can happen and we have experienced this. There is even an OSS note explaining this concept, which makes sense business-wise.
    However you check the scenarios I have mentioned. If the behaviour is as I have mentioned, then you have to change the pricing date of your problamatic sales order to one day earlier, or move the validity date one day earlier.
    If the behaviour is different, pls lemme know

  • Condition Type  not displaying on the pricing procedure

    Hello We are copying a sales order contract with reference to a sales order but we want a condition on the contract pricing procedure to be determined. Now I know I could redetermine pricing by selecting these option but we can't do that as there could be  a year difference so we need the old pricing. B    Carry out new pricing C    Copy manual pricing elements and redetermine the others e.g. Sales Order  Pricing Procedure XXXX                         Conditions ZPR0                          Conditions ZHD1 Create Contract with reference to sales order    Contract  Pricing Procedure yyyyy                         Conditions ZPR0                          Conditions ZHD1                         Conditions ZNEW In the analysis the condition ZNEW has the "Condition without condition record (not relevant)" As I mention in new pricing it appears   

    Hi Roy,
    Trust you are doing good,
    I have gone through the question which you have asked but its not clear what do you want to exactly do.
    Pricing Procedure XXXX                         Conditions ZPR0                          Conditions ZHD1 Create Contract with reference to sales order    Contract  Pricing Procedure yyyyy                         Conditions
    Here you talking about two different pricing procedures..or you talking in terms of pricing values.
    Please highlight.
    Thank you,
    Regards
    SRT

  • SD: Condition record not getting automatically determined

    Hi,
    Condition record not getting automatically determined for a condition type for which following access is maintained.
    The access has table containing following fields:
    Sales Organisation
    Distribution Channel
    Division
    Sales Document type
    Sales Document No.
    Material no.
    Following is the scenario:
    A sales order is created  for Project Systems attach a WBS element to the line item .
    With respect to the above created sales order a Billing request ( a sales doc. type which is different than the above sales order). When the billing request is created materials appearing in the line item will be different.Different materials will appear in the billing request because of the DIP profile maintained.
    The prerequisite is that before creating billing request the sales employee has to maintain condition master record with above access.The condition record will combine sales organisation, distribution channel, division, sales document type ,
    sales document number ( the 1st refered sales order)
    and the material are different
    than the ones maintained in the 1st sales order.
    This will enable in getting billing request generated without manual intervention in pricing for other materials for which condition records have been maintained as stated above.
    Following is the error message we get
    ===================================
    " Inactive        X   Inactive via formulae of incorrect "
    Thanks
    Aby
    Message was edited by: Aby Jacob Emmanuel

    As I know, thats just a warning message(if its a std one).
    Ignore it and save.
    Check your pricing date of the document. For execution it should be similar or after valid-from date maintain in condition record.
    But, you need not create a condition record. Simply change the existing one combination of your desire. But, this warning will come there also for your combination.
    Thanks & Regards
    JP

  • Tax Condition ZSRT not showing in Print Preview and Tax Register

    Dear Friends
    while we making Purchase Order the Tax condition not showing while print preview.  also not showing in Tax Register.
    Tax Register we developed.
    any hops
    Rajesh G

    Dear,
           ZSRT is a customised condition which you have created. So to bring that condition in print preview you have to talk to your ABAPER , so that he can incorporate this condition type to his customised print preview program. If your tax register is also customised then again you have to communicate to the ABAPER.

  • SRM 7.0 PO Condition are not copied in ECC po

    Hi Experts!!!
    i am facing the problem SRM 7.0 PO Condition are not copied in ECC po, Net price is Coming instead of Gross price. & is there any BADI why which i can Fecth the Condition Data From SRM Quotation to ECC.
    pls help me it is go-live critical.
    regards
    vikas

    Hi Masa,
    1. Do the texts need to be mapped in the  node that you hjave mentioned. Sould not the SRM texts be mapped to ECC textx by default . After all , it shoud be standard predelivered feature . I have not done any mapping but still the SRM supplier text in shopping cart line item , flows into ECC Material Text in ECC PO line item.
    i.e by default SRM supplier text in shopping cart line item = ECC Material Text in ECC PO line item.
    No other text from SRM SC or PO ir flowing into ECC PO
    Rgds
    Sumendra

  • Variant config pricing condition description not correct

    Hi Gurus!
    I created Sales Order with a variant configuration material, pricing with package items. System pick up the correct
    pricing but pricing Condition Name for all the items are the same, system is taking variant description VK30 instead
    of condition type description in VK11.
    I have a package e.g.
    Material:  Phone Package A
    Condition type:
    - ZZ01 Phone 
    - ZZ02 Charger
    - ZZ03 Battery
    Data entry: Material A001 Nokia phone package
    charcteristics: Phone       PA
                           Charger    A1
                           Battery     T1
    System compute all the description of condition type is the same
    Material:  Phone Package A
    Condition type:
    key: PA-A1-T1
    - ZZ01 Package A for Nokia AAA   10.00
    - ZZ02 Package A for Nokia AAA   30.00
    - ZZ03 Package A for Nokia AAA   50.00
    I want the description of Condition Type not the variant description. Any clue on how to get the correct description of the
    Condition Type?

    Hi Sunny,
    1) With respect to your original question (e.g. "how to have the VTEXT field on the Conditions tab display the Condition Type Description set via the IMG rather than the Variant Description set via txn VK30"). Please know that once you check the "Variant Condition" flag for a condition type, the system has no choice but to present the Variant Description because this behavior is hard-coded.
    Easiest solution would be to activate screen overlay functionality (such as GUIXT) which can present the desired text to the user without affecting underlying code. Another alternative is to ask a developer to make an implicit enhancement that overrides the description just before presentation to the user.
    If neither solution works out and the users insist that you show the condition type description, then variant pricing simply doesn't fit. Hopefully you don't get to this point, but if it happens, then you would have to revert to standard (non-variant) pricing. To start you would need new display-only VBAP fields for each price-relevant characteristic (e.g. ztraining, zcourse_type, zstudent, and maybe zresource). and then custom code to copy values selected in the VC back to the corresponding new line item fields which can be done via a user-exit. Then you would follow the normal process for introducing new price-relevant fields, and redesign your condition types and condition tables to remove all reference to pricing variants. A hassle, but side benefit would be more straight-forward master-data maintenance since the user can directly see and maintain all pricing key fields in VK11/12/13 (rather than having to check variant table(s) to discover how the pricing key fields translate to variant keys) and of course they would always see the condition type description as desired.
    2) Moving on to address your 3rd-August follow-on comment from the other thread (e.g. "However, when I change the input Resource from 01 (Classroom) to 02 (Whiteboard) ... ZA01 is gone"). Is this what you wanted? If yes, then a user who needs a Classroom and Whiteboard and a Projector, would have to create a sales order with three configurable line items - is this the desired outcome?
    Edited by: Laura J. Williams on Sep 23, 2010 1:22 AM

  • Condition type not flown(not determined) into the sales order

    Hello Experts,
    There is one discount condition type which is having proper condition records, validity date.However, it is not getting determined properly and is not flown into the sales order. the user wants to know why this may happen.I tried to reason it may be the sales order date and the conditon record date may be different or the condition record is changed after the creation of the sales order.neither of the reasons seem to hold good. any ideas?
    Regards,
    Raj

    Hello,
    I have looked into the analysis and asked him to update the condition by clicking on that.also, I found that the condition record is having a proper valid date. now the user would update only after knowing the exact reason why it did not flow into the sales order,he knows he has to update the condition but would not do so till he knows the right reason why condition is not determined in the sales order. now this is the situation.
    the probable reasons as per analysis of the conditon type are as follows(for your information). can it be one ofThere are different reasons for this:
    1)The condition was deleted manually in the item condition screen.
    2)The condition record was created later. Please note that order processing and pricing have buffer mechanisms. This means that a newly added condition record might only be found after order processing has been left completely and then started again.  them?
    Regards,
    Raj.

  • How to break a loop when if condition is not satisfied

    Hi,
    I need some help on the following code. I know how to use CONTINUE or EXIT in loop but the problem is inside the loop i am using subroutine in which i am using if conditions. if one of those if conditions are not satified then it has to come out of the subroutine without executing remaing statements.
    sample code is as follows:
    loop at itab into wa_tab.
    perform check. using wa_tab changing it_tab.
    endloop.
    form check using ix_tab type itab
    .                changing ir_tab type it_tab.
    if x is not INITIAL.
    else.
    "COME OUT OF THE ROUTINE"
    endif.
    if y is not INITIAL.
    else.
    "COME OUT OF THE ROUTINE"
    endif.
    in the above code if x is empty i have to come out of the subroutine without executing next if condition.

    Hi,
    loop at itab into wa_tab.
    perform check. using wa_tab changing it_tab.
    endloop.
    form check using ix_tab type itab
    . changing ir_tab type it_tab.
    if x is not INITIAL.
    else if y is not INITIAL.
    else.
    "COME OUT OF THE ROUTINE"
    endif.
    endform.
    or
    loop at itab into wa_tab.
    perform check. using wa_tab changing it_tab changing lv_errflg.
    IF LV_FLAG EQ 'X'.
    EXIT.
    ENDIF.
    endloop.
    form check using ix_tab type itab
    . changing ir_tab type it_tab.
    if x is not INITIAL.
    else if y is not INITIAL.
    else.
    "COME OUT OF THE ROUTINE"
    lv_flag = 'X'.
    endif.
    endform.
    Thanks,
    Mahesh

  • Guard Condition is not working

    Dear Friends,
    I have created a dashboard using BI queries. output of queries is displaying via charts.
    Now i have to display charts one by one in single layer. Here i triggered the Select Event on the output of CHART A and Guard Condition as well.
    Now guard condition is not working properly. i want display of CHART A first then after clicking on tab i want display of CHART B. But here i always get CHART B first, which is not the requirement.
    I am using VC 7.0 with flex2 compiler. EP patc level is SP17.
    Kindly hep me out to resolve this.
    Thanks & Regards
    Nivedita

    Drag an output from your table to a data store and add a field to the datastore (lets call it GUARDFIELD). Click the connector between the table and the data store. Make sure the event name is select and assign GUARDFIELD with the following value:
    STORE@GUARDFIELD+1
    Now add a guard condition to the select connector between the table and chart B and use following code:
    STORE@GUARDFIELD>0
    This is going to check that GUARDFIELD is greater than 0, which will only be true when you click the table for first time. If this doesn't make sense let me know and I'll try find the blog which explains this.

  • Condition is not working

    Hi ALL..
    Please give me your suggestions why this problem occurs.
    In the condition,when I keep the Charecteristic Assignment as "All Charecteristics in Drilldown independently" then I am getting only result row.
    But when I used "Individual Chars and Char Comb" and marked the Char which are in the rows The condition works, but again when we drildown with any of the free characterisitics or remove any characteristics in the row the Condition gets deactivated itself and the irrelavant records are also displayed in the report output.
    Please let us know whats d cause behind this..
    Thanks in advance,
    Kalpana

    Hi Kalpana
    That's the only problem with 'Conditions'
    when you are adding the conditions 'Ijndividual Char. and Combinations...' it is not applicable to the Chars. in free char area. The conditions doesnt apply to them. So obviously you will get incorrect results.
    Solution : You need to have a report only for 'Conditions' purpose and with all the desired chars. Do not allow the business users to drill down with the Free char. In fact, there should be no Free char. Yes, it sounds stupid but that's how it is !!!
    As for 'All char.....' option it gets applied to all chars and only the satisfying combination gets displayed. The fact that you are getting only result rows means only result row satisfies all the conditions.
    You could go through the documentation on 'Conditions' which clearly explains this fundas..
    Cheers
    Umesh

Maybe you are looking for