Config etherchannel for point to point link

for point to pint network i use privateip  and i use two link thus the config for etherchannel works
My requirement there are 2 link so can i bundled with etherchaanel
0n l3 switch(switch1)
int po1
no switchport
ip address 172.18.2.1 255.255.255.0
no shutdown
int range fa0/1-2
no switchport
switchport access valn 199
channel-group 1 mode on
on fa0/1--isp1 link
on fa0/1---isp2 link
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.18.2.2
on l3 switch(switch2)
int p01
no switchport
ip address 172.18.2.2 255.255.255.0
no shutdown
int range fa0/1-2
no switchport
switchport access vlan 22
channel-group 1 mode on
on fa0/1-isp1 link
on fa0/2-isp2 link
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.18.2.1

Hello Prashant,
I recommend to use LACP instead of unconditional bundling it provides the capability to detect the neighbor and that is the same system connected to the other link.
You have ISP connections in the middle and so it is important to bundle in a safe way.
So I would use
channel-group 1 mode active
in order to use LACP. LACP messages are sent over every member link.
Another point of attention is that you are configuring each multilayer switch with a static default route to the other device and this is not good practice.
If you know that one site is more important you can configure the static default route on the other router, but on the main site you should configure specific static routes describing the IP subnets that are reachable at the other site.
Hope to help
Giuseppe

Similar Messages

  • Rx load 100/255 observing packet drops on a point to point link

    Hi, I have point to point link, if rxload goes above 40%, packets are getting dropped on a link. checked with ISP for mux issue but there is no problem from isp side. please suggest

    Please post the configs and sh int output.

  • IPv6 Addressing Point to Point Links in the enterprise

    For an enterprise, it doesn't seem to make sense to use Global addressing for point to point, transit-only links and loopbacks.
    Link-local only addressing breaks debugging tools like traceroute, DNS, etc.
    Is Unique Local the correct choice for this?
    I've searched quite a bit and I've not found a lot of discussion about scope selection for point to point links.  Some RFCs such as 6164 imply Global scope vs Unique Local scope usage is a preference.  Most discussions of point to point addressing focus on bit length.  I'm assuming this means design concerns are agnostic toward scope selection.
    Is anyone aware of documentation I've missed or have any recommendations in this area?
    If ULA was the correct choice, address hierarchy might look like this:
    DataNetwork1 -- Router1 -- ULA.1.1 -- Link -- ULA1.2 -- Agg Router -- Core
    DataNetwork2 -- Router2 -- ULA.2.1 -- Link -- ULA2.2 -- Agg Router /
    DataNetwork3 -- Router3 -- ULA.3.1 -- Link -- ULA3.2 -- Agg Router /
    The network core would have summarized entries for DataNetwork[1|2|3] and ULA[1|2|3].  IE, there would be a Global hierarchy and a ULA hierarchy.

    Scott,
    Let me break this down into some categories for you.
    Address selection:
    I believe that best practice is to use Global Unicast Addressing everywhere (coupled with a proper security policy at your edge). ULA was a compromise for Site Local never being properly defined and whilst it can be used in the same way as GUA I don't believe it is worth it. Irrespective of what you use (GUA or ULA), subject to your security and routing policy traceroute will work from both ends (e.g. you tracing out, someone tracing in)
    Address masking:
    The general rule of thumb is that you allocate /64s to eveything and then mask down to the appropriate mask for the function you are expecting (P.S. Forget everything you learnt about IPv4 address conservation). If you are using /127 masks then in theory every p2p link in your network is either a 0 (::) or a 1 (::1)
    e.g.
    traceroute HostB:
    1     2001:1234:abcd:1::1
    2     2001:1234:abcd:2::1
    3     2001:1234:abcd:3::1
    4     2001::4:10
    The only exception to this is loopbacks, you can sequentially allocate /128s from the same /64 block
    NOTE: /127 support is recent and may not be supported by some vendors, in this case use /126 masking (same as you would use /30s in IPv4)
    If you have a /48 ( a normal enterise allocation) or larger then this should not be an issue ( you have access to 65536 x /64s) the only reason you would consider ULA for infrastructure numbering is because you have a small IPv6 pool. I would still argue you should get more IPv6 addresses than use ULA.
    I hope this helps
    Cheers

  • BI Content for Point of sales( POS) module in retail

    Hi Friends,
    Anybody have got the link for Bi content for Point of sales(POS) module in retail industry.
    Please post the link and good documents on this.
    will assign the points.
    Best regards
    SAP

    Dear Srinivas,
    I've already run a systemtrace to find out the tables:
    The following tables are involved: MPOS, MMPT, MPLA and MHIO, MHIS.
    In BI-Content I just find MPOS in the DataSource 0PM_MAINTPOS_ATTR and 0PM_MAINTPOS_TEXT. That is ok for master data.
    The other tables I couldn't find in BI-Content.
    But maybe the BI-Content does not use these tables. Maybe there is used a view which I don't see in the trace.
    Regards.

  • L2 Failover Plan for Point to Point

    We have 2 point to point links from 2 different ISP's for the purpose of connecting to our data center from our office. We would like to configure a failover scenario using these two P2P links.
    I have been trying with the sTP method but for some reason we could not succeed in this, could be because of the distance.
    Please help me to implement a failover P2P conectivity usign this two links.

    Hello,
    Is there a specific reason you are using Layer 2 between sites? If the links are the same bandwidth you could create a port-channel - where both physical links become one logical link, this is ideal because the fail-over is seamless without losing any connectivity and is far superior to spanning-tree.
    To configure this:
    interface Port-channel1
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport mode trunk
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
    description Link to ISP1
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport mode trunk
    switchport nonegotiate
    channel-group 1 mode active
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/2
    description Link to ISP2
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport mode trunk
    switchport nonegotiate
    channel-group 1 mode active
    This could also be accomplished with IP routing. you can can configure the interfaces as layer 3 ports and setup a routing protocol between sites - Like EIGRP. EIGRP can do equal and unequal cost load balancing or simply route all traffic via one link and automatically route via the other if the primary went down.
    If you provide more data I could offer more assitance with design and configuration.

  • Asking for points!!!

    Hi all,
    I am sure you would have seen people asking for points whenever they answer any question. However simple they are. It has reached the points of Having a signature as Reward points if it helps!!! Who else finds it annoying?

    I dont believe that asking for points or saying "Points will be awarded" in a question is really a capital crime.  I can ignore this when I read a post quite easily.  More annoying is the paste of masses of links, help text, program code, program output, etc that means you have to scroll down 25 pages to see the next persons post in the thread.
    I would prefer if a signature line like <b>"Please reward useful answers and Close this thread"</b> was used more often to prompt people to shut down threads where there is a valid answer.  This would save me time reading through posts that I think I can answer only to find someone has got there first.  I would still read many such posts for interest (especially if I recognise some of the names on the post as being people who normally post intelligent answers).
    As stated by David Z. Pantich in his reply to this thread, I think the issue of wrong or misleading answers or links is a much more serious problem.  I also have issues with answers that answer the question asked without getting sufficient information or checking that the answer is appropriate (like telling someone how to directly update a SAP table without asking or advising about BAPI's, BDC's, etc.).
    Having some format to questions so that basic details like product / version etc are included would mean you dont advise a 31H user to us the Enhancement Framework for example.  This would help improve quality of some answers a bit.
    I dont believe the total removal of the points sytem would be a good idea.  One good effect of allocating points is that those who allocate points generally also close their threads at the same time.  If no points were to be allocated there would be even less pressure for users to close threads and we would all spend even more time reading through threads that were finished.
    The major issue with points seems to be that they are a measure of quantity not quality.  This is like a lot of current television shows where viewer voting is a measure of popularity, not of talent.
    Perhaps some form of after the event weighting of points by peers could address this imbalance a bit.  If there were simple radio buttons for 1 to 5 rating against each response made by a person, which were aggregated and applied as a percentage modifier to the persons total points (perhaps with some form of sliding  time scale so recent votes counted more) then a person with 5000 points for lots of useless responses could find their points only counting as 500 if a lot of their responses were voted a "1". 
    There would need to be checks and balances - options might be for example:
      - only one vote per person per post;
      - votes by people from the same company domain get discounted;
      - votes only by people with 100+ points; 
      - votes only against posts by people with 250+ points;
      - moderator ability to over-ride or modify;
      - only apply weighting once 100 plus people had voted on a persons quality;
      - etc.     
    I would hope that the result of this would be that a person judged in this manner would start to think about what they were posting and reduce the quantity to improve the quality.  The various checks should also be designed to prevent effects like people "ganging up" to get at a particular poster. 
    Hope these thoughts are useful and of interest to some.
    Andrew

  • Mac upgrade to Yosemite, Adobe Indesign CS5 keyboard shortcuts not working -  t for text  - z for zoom - v for pointer etc

    So I upgraded my MACBOOK PRO (Retina, Mid 2012) 2.7 Ghz Intel Core i7
    to MAC OS X YOSEMITE
    Adobe Indesign CS5 generally works with some very annoying bugs.
    All major keyboard shortcuts that use a single key command have stopped working. and these happen to be the main ones I use all the time for editing...
    t for text
    z for zoom
    v for pointer
    It's annoying because now I have to keep  going back to the tool bar to change my cursor selection. It's just slowing me down.
    Annoying but workable.
    Has anyone else go this issue?
    An update or fix would be greatly appreciated.

    WARNING!!!
    I was contacted by  apparently a third party supplier called Adobe Systems via this forum
    They logged in to my computer via team viewer
    installed utorrent
    and proceed to download a cracked version of adobe cs6
    in the mean time saying on skype that Adobe no longer has Adobe CS6 on their server.
    This seemed very OFF to me and I disconnected the skype (and blocked Adobe Systems) and disconnected TeamViewer
    If I wanted a cracked version of Adobe CS6 I'm very capable of doing this kind of thing my self
    However I run a business I want to have a legitimate licensed copy of the software running for my staff.
    They were offering a fully licensed version of a Adobe Master Suite CS6 with my own unique ID for USD$400
    Again very OFF considering the upgrade from Adobe from Indesign CS5 to CS6 is almost AUD$1600
    I don't know how they got my email address from this forum but it seems that the adobe forum has been hacked!
    you have been warned!

  • How about two SDN "blogspaces" : one FOR points  and 1 NOT FOR points ?

    I suggest that the current SDN logspace be divided into two subspaces:
    one for points: this is where technical and/or non-controversial messages would be posted and be rewarded according to the current rules
    one not for points: this is where folks would post "controversial" messages (technical or non-technical) that would not get any point reward.
    I would personally prefer to post in the "not for points" subspace, for several reasons.
    But I'd prefer to see what others have to say before saying what they are.
    By the way, there's a US expression "preaching to the choir".  The new blog (for no points) would be for those who are not necessarily "preaching to the choir".
    djh

    david,
    i think i do understand your intention and therefore agree with you.
    IMHO, the blogsphere here on SDN, as execellent as it is, is kind of a 'posing platform' rather than a discussion space. People do post their contributions, receive their points reward and expect some congratulations and cheering if anything at all. I happened to me that people got upset when I questioned the use or correctness or usefulness of some of the content of their blogs. When it did this with the intention to discuss matters, I recognized that people actually didn't want to discuss their contributions.
    Of course the things said above do not hold true for for a big number of contributors.
    The same thing thing in the forums. A lot of people do provide very valuable answers but often not discuss matters when points are already given.
    So having a discussion area, free of the rewards system's pressures might be a helpful addition. Something like a discussions corner. In Vienna we call this 'Kaffeehaus'
    A place where you post some free thought where you don't have to justify the minimum blog reward points, where you don't have to apply the care expected in drafting a blog, etc..
    Just freestyle discussion on useful or not so useful topics.
    regards,
    anton

  • In logic X I am trying to normalize but the track and file option in the edit window is not there at all just the drop down for pointer eraser etc. Any ideas? Thanks!..

    In logic X I am trying to normalize but the track and file option in the edit window is not there at all just the drop down for pointer eraser etc. Any ideas? Thanks!..

    Total life saver. Thank you

  • WLC code for point to point bridging

    What is the best WLC code for point to point and point to multipoint bridging on a 2504 with 2602 APs? 7.2-7.4 had transparent vlan issues and I'm not sure if they were fixed in 7.5-7.6. We have 5-6 vlans that we are needing to bridge between a large open area. Also, are there any bugs with wireless mesh and ISE?

    You do not have many choices now, only 7.0.250.0, 7.4.121.0 & 7.6.110.0 codes are supported by Cisco. All other codes have been deferred by them.
    I do not have configured those set-up to advise you specific to that. I would think 7.6.110.0 may have fixed whatever the known bugs in previous versions.
    HTH
    Rasika
    **** Pls rate all useful responses ****

  • Do we need ask for points

    Hi friends,
    one more chance to share my latest query..... when i first started into this forum i used to request for points after answering questions....  But since a long time i dropped this idea since the poster of the question anyway knows and has the responsibility to reward based on the merit of the answers.
    So, in such case how much fair / required it is again to ask for points. ....My intention is how can we give balance to content and not just worry so much about points-
    And its bit painful to see people who ask questions which require spoon feeding some times say that Points will be definitely rewarded to attract : as if we would answer anything for points.
    at the end of my query i thought the correct subject of my question would be why do we need to ask for points
    Your opinions please.....
    Best Regards,
    Sadhu Kishore

    Sadhu:
    Thanks a lot for this post! -:D
    Here's my explanation...People just don't read...They still think that they are going to get some free T-Shirts by gaining points on SCN...They think that they're going to get better jobs or that they're going to have better reputation...
    Nothing farther from the truth...Points are only good for the Food for People program...Nothing more...And I would love to think that people want to contribute to this wonderful program...But I'm not that naive -;)
    I have crossed the 10K milestone...Why? Just because it was a personal goal...And because I get points for writing blogs and posting answers to the forums...But of course...I have never asked for them...
    People must understand that this is a professional community...That we're are doing this because we love SAP (Ok...At least I love SAP)...
    To me ask for points it's like give something to charity and say "Say thanks otherwise I get my stuff and get out of here"...Very bad behavior...
    Points are not going to go...They exists for a reason and I wanted them to stay...People must change...And change for good...
    Greetings,
    Blag.

  • SDO_UTIL.GETNUMVERTICES for point type geometries returns gtype?

    Hi folks,
    This is a head scratcher.
    Uh shouldn't this always return 1? It seems to return the get_gtype value.
    SELECT
    SDO_UTIL.GETNUMVERTICES(
       SDO_GEOMETRY(
          2001,
          8265,
          SDO_POINT_TYPE(
             -86.85791015625,
             33.3029861812241,
             NULL
          NULL,
          NULL
    FROM DUAL;We can get even whackier. This returns 9!
    SELECT
    SDO_UTIL.GETNUMVERTICES(
       SDO_GEOMETRY(
          9001,
          8265,
          SDO_POINT_TYPE(
             NULL,
             NULL,
             NULL
          NULL,
          NULL
    FROM DUAL;Am I missing some nuance here?
    Thanks!
    Paul

    Hi Paul,
    I'm looking forward to hearing you work the term "fancy hat" into an explanation of this behavior.
    I get the same behavior on 11.2.0.2. Tsk tsk on you for not mentioning your version. Back on 10.2.0.4 the same select statements yield:
    ORA-06531: Reference to uninitialized collection
    ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.SDO_UTIL", line 344
    So the only nuance I can think of, which isn't really a nuance at all, is that getnumvertices isn't allowed for point types.
    Matt

  • Cheep solution for SHDSL routers for Point to Point Connectivity

    Please give me best solution and cost effective solution for SHDSL routers for Point to Point Connectivity.

    Already replied in another thread, please do not open duplicates.

  • Firewall necessary for Point to Point internet connections?

    Firewall necessary for Point to Point internet connections? We have multiple point to point t1 connections to our sites and was wondering if a firewall should be in place to filter traffic. We are also implenting a microwave t1 from a service provider and was wondering if firewalls would be needed for just this or the wired as well. According to the microwave company no firewalls are needed. Do i really want to leave security in the hands of the ISP?

    Matt,
    If you are buying private line T1 service from a carrier that connects 2 of your sites you would not use a firewall. Your traffic is never mixed with any other traffic. If your data is very sensitive, or if you have to comply with Payment Card Industry standards then you might want to encrypt your data, but a firewall would still not be necessary.
    If you have a T1 connecting you to the Internet for Web browsing etc then you very much do need a firewall.
    Please rate helpful posts.
    Dave

  • Questions to moderators: is begging for points eligible to moderation?

    Hello mods,
    posted that outside of the RA thread, so that it be noticed and debated.
    In a topic ({thread:id=2296311}) posted in the Community Feedback forum, OTN regulars voice against begging for points ("Please mark my answer as helpful/correct").
    One of them even points to a "Posting Guidelines" post ({message:id=9698382}) (I don't know whether it's a copy of whatever official OTN posting guidelines page) that suggests moderators are allowed to edit out such point-begging posts.
    I have noticed such begging lately, including from respected and otherwise helpful regulars.
    - What is the community's opinion about points begging?
    - What is the moderator's point of view about moderating it out? I've never seen that applied here - I don't know how busy you are with the existing duty already, been away for a while.
    Best regards,
    J.
    Edited by: jduprez on Oct 23, 2011 12:45 AM - fixed title

    EJP wrote:
    In a topic ({thread:id=2296311}) posted in the Community Feedback forum, OTN regulars voice against begging for points ("Please mark my answer as helpful/correct").Only the OP of the thread has actually done that, and he's hardly a regular with only 141 posts.I haven't claimed that. This topic just reminded me some deviant behavior beheld here lately.
    The rest of it is a discussion by real regulars about the inanity of the points system and of the forum software ;-)As usual on that forum, yes :o) It's quite hard to convince them that the same harshly-bashed Jive software was working fine on the late Sun forums.
    One of them even points to a "Posting Guidelines" post ({message:id=9698382}) (I don't know whether it's a copy of whatever official OTN posting guidelines page) that suggests moderators are allowed to edit out such point-begging posts.That message in in the PL/SQL forum only. I'm a moderator and I've never been aware of such a guideline in general.
    And I certainly don't go around editing posts wholesale, life's too short.Fair enough.
    I have noticed such begging lately, including from respected and otherwise helpful regulars.Here? I haven't seen it.Maybe not on JP, but on various other narrower-topic Java forums. But I won't sneak on ... , ..., and ..., they're worth better than that :o)
    - What is the moderator's point of view about moderating it out? I've never seen that applied here - I don't know how busy you are with the existing duty already, been away for a while.My opinion is that I really couldn't care less about points begging. The moderators have more important things to do than go looking for trivia like this, such as work, and real moderation, i.e. of offensive or irrelevant content. But in general if a post has no useful content, it is noise, and therefore probably eligible for deletion. If you find such a post you are welcome to report it in the 'Report Abuse' thread where the moderators will at least see it.Note taken. Case closed.
    Have a nice day,
    J.

Maybe you are looking for