Configuring queue for Producer - first-available Consumer delivery

Hello,
Setting
consumerFlowLimit to 1
consumerFlowThreshold to 0
doesn't appear to be enough to ensure that messages from a queue are delivered to the first available consumer.
We are trying to implement a classic Producer(s) -> Consumer(s) job distribution scheme where our jobs are lengthy and vary in duration.
It's important that msgs are sent to the next available Consumer and not waiting/buffered at a busy Consumer.
What we see with the settings above is that more than one message appears to be buffered at each consumer when it starts. After the startup buffering, the settings appear to be working as intended.
We are using openmq 4.3, but happy to move to 4.4 if required.
This question was posted earlier to the users list, but I've posted here with elaboration. Thanks!
Steven Marcus

This is a critical bug for us. Can we raise the priority of fixing this?
With the current implementation, openMQ guarantees to deliver messages out-of-order when using multiple consumers.

Similar Messages

  • Configure NWBC for the first time

    Hi,
    I tried to configure NWBC for the first time and i am having problem at the login configuration on the URL. I am not sure what is the correct URL i should put here. I followed the guide on http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp2ru/helpdata/en/31/8dd113b8ba4832aeaafb4b756e1eed/frameset.htm and read through sap note 900000 but still cannot get this URL resolve.
    If can, please provide me step by step on how to obtain the information on the URL syntax as provided the in the configuration guide
    http(s)://<server>.<domain>.<ext>:<port>/<path>
    Thank you

    Hi,
    The URL should ideally be:
    http://<fully qualified host name>:<http port>/sap/bc/nwbc/nwbc_launch.
    But if you run the transaction 'nwbc' from the SAPGui, that should automatically open up this link. What is the error you get while opening this link?
    To find the fully qualified domain name and http port details:
    - goto tcode smicm
    - click services icon or shift+f1, here http port number is shown
    - goto -> parameters -> display -> check icm/host_name_full, here the fqdn is shown
    Regards,
    Srikishan

  • How to configure queues for sending IDOCs from XI in the same order receive

    Hi,
       We are collecting IDOCs and sending them to XI using a background job (RSEOUT00) from R/3. When XI receiving these collected IDOCs, it's forwarding the received IDOCs into different queues for processing them and sending them to receiver system. Some times some queues are taking longer time to process the received IDOC and in the mean time the latest IDOC received getting processed and sent to receiver system. When the information related to this old IDOC is sent out to receiver system after the latest IDOC information is  sent to due to delay in Queue processing, we are getting errors in the receiver system. Can somebody explain the steps to configure queues to process the IDOCs in the same order they received from R/3.

    Hi,
    Why not tunnel all the IDOCs to one queue for processing ?
    Cheers
    Colin.

  • Could Buffer replace the Queue in Producer/Consumer Design Pattern

    Hello,
    I have a question that the task of Buffer is to store the data and the queue is also of the same so could we use the Buffer inplace of queue in a Producer/Consumer Design Pattern.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    No, those buffer examples are not nearly equal to a queue and will never ever "replace" queues in producer/consumer.
    The most important advantage of queues for producer/consumer (which none of the other buffer mechanics share) is that it works eventbased to notify the reader that data is available. So if you would simply replace the queue by overly elaborate buffer mechanics as you attached to your last post, you will lose a great deal of the the purpose using producer/consumer.
    So, to compare both mechanics:
    - Queue works eventbased, whereas the buffer example does not.
    - Queue has to allocate memory during runtime if more elements are written to the queue than dequeued. This is also true for the buffer (it has to be resized).
    - Since the buffer is effectively simply an array with overhead, memory management is getting slow and messy with increasing memory fragmentation. Queues perform way better here (but have their limits there too).
    - The overhead for the buffer (array handling) has to be implemented manually. Queue functions encapsulate all necessary functionality you will ever need. So queues do have a simple API, whereas the buffer has not.
    - Since the buffer is simply an array, you will have a hard time sharing the content in two parallel running loops. You will need to either implement additional overhead using data value references to manage the buffer or waste lots of memory by using mechanics like variables. In addition to wasting memory, you will presumably run into race conditions so do not even think about this.
    So this leads to four '+' for the queue and only one point where "buffer" equals the queue.
    i hope, this clears things up a bit.
    Norbert
    CEO: What exactly is stopping us from doing this?
    Expert: Geometry
    Marketing Manager: Just ignore it.

  • Is it a proper way to use queue for consumer/producer model?

    Hi all,
      I am following the example of consumer/producer model to use the queue to synchronize the following process: The producer is a loop to produce N numbers, I will put every generated number into an array and after every 5 numbers generated, I put the array into the queue and pass it to the consumer. I have to wait the consumer use up the data and it will then remove the element from queue so the producer will get a chance to produce another 5 numbers. Since I set the maximum size of the queue to be ONE, I expect the producer and consumer take turns to produce / consume all five numbers and pass the chance to the other. Here is my code
    when the case box is false, the code will be
    For the first 5 numbers, the produce will generate every thing right and put that into the array, and it will pass the array to the quere so the consumer will get a chance to loop over the array. I except the procude's loop will continue only when the queue is available (i.e. all elements are removed), but it seems that once the consumer start the loop the produce 's loop will continue (so the indicator x+1 and x+2 will show numbers changed). But it is not what I want, I know there must be something wrong but I can't tell what is it.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    dragondriver wrote:
    As you said in 1, the sequency structure enforcing the execution order, that's why I put it there, in this example, to put the issue simple, I replace the complete code with number increase, in the real case, the first +1 and +2 must be executed in that order.
    Mikeporter mentioned:
    1. Get rid of all the sequence structures. None of them are doing anything but enforcing an execution order that would be the same without them.
    So even if you remove the sequence structure, there will be a fixed & defined execution order and that is because LabVIEW follows DATA FLOW MODEL.
    Data Flow Model (specifically in context of LabVIEW): A block diagram node executes when it receives all required inputs. When a node executes, it produces output data and passes the data to the next node in the dataflow path. The movement of data through the nodes determines the execution order of the VIs and functions on the block diagram (Click here for reference).
    Now in your code, just removing the sequence structure will not make sure that the execution order will gonna remain same but you need to do few very small modifications (like pass the error wire through For loop, before it goes to 'Dequeue Element' node).
    Coming to the main topic: is it a proper way to use queue for consumer/producer model?
    The model you're using (and calling it as consumer/producer model) is way too deviated from the original consumer/producer model model.
    dragondriver wrote:
    For the second one, yes, it is my fault to remove that while. I actually start from the example of Producer/Consumer design pattern template, but I didn't pay attention to the while loop in the consumer part.
    While loops (both Producer & Consumer) are the essential part of this architecture and can't be removed. You may want to start your code again using standard template.
    I am not allergic to Kudos, in fact I love Kudos.
     Make your LabVIEW experience more CONVENIENT.

  • Random mail delivery delays - stuck in queue for extended periods of time

    I'm really hoping someone can help me out here. I'm setting up a new OS X Mail server (upgrading from Tenon Post.Office). I'm using accounts from Active Directory and everything seems to be working great... except (you knew there was an 'except' didn't ya?) that I'm randomly getting long delays in email delivery.
    From what troubleshooting I've done so far, basically the emails are coming to our domain, hitting our Symantec anti-virus / anti-spam server and then getting forwarded to my mail server fine. I can look in the SMTP logs and see the emails showing up...
    But then, completely randomly, there is sometimes a long 1-6 hour delay before it transfers from the SMTP to actually being able to get the email in our clients. I can see these emails sitting in the queue, but clicking the 'Retry' and entering some of the commands I've seen on this board don't seem able to kick the queue into gear.
    We're just in testing right now, so only have about 6 users on this machine, but there is going to be about 1000 when I'm all said and done, so the fact that I'm getting these delays already concerns me. Network and CPU activity are barely even showing (this is a quad Xeon server, so lots of power), so I don't think things are being overloaded, which makes me suspect some kind of configuration error.
    Looking at other requests, I'm assuming I'm going to be asked for postconf -n and the output of some of the logs, so let me add that now:
    The results of postconf -n
    alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
    command_directory = /usr/sbin
    config_directory = /etc/postfix
    daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
    debugpeerlevel = 2
    enableserveroptions = yes
    html_directory = no
    inet_interfaces = all
    mail_owner = postfix
    mailboxsizelimit = 0
    mailbox_transport = cyrus
    mailq_path = /usr/bin/mailq
    manpage_directory = /usr/share/man
    messagesizelimit = 41943040
    mydestination = $myhostname,localhost.$mydomain,localhost,prn.bc.ca,mail.sd60.prn.bc.ca,mail.pr n.bc.ca
    mydomain = prn.bc.ca
    mydomain_fallback = localhost
    myhostname = mail.prn.bc.ca
    mynetworks = 127.0.0.1/32,142.27.0.0/16
    mynetworks_style = host
    newaliases_path = /usr/bin/newaliases
    ownerrequestspecial = no
    queue_directory = /private/var/spool/postfix
    readme_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix
    recipient_delimiter = +
    relayhost =
    sample_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix/examples
    sendmail_path = /usr/sbin/sendmail
    setgid_group = postdrop
    smtpdpw_server_securityoptions = plain,login,cram-md5,gssapi
    smtpdrecipientrestrictions = permitsasl_authenticated,permit_mynetworks,reject_unauthdestination,permit
    smtpdsasl_authenable = yes
    smtpdtlsCAfile =
    smtpdtls_certfile = /etc/certificates/mail.prn.bc.ca.crt
    smtpdtls_keyfile = /etc/certificates/mail.prn.bc.ca.key
    smtpduse_pwserver = yes
    smtpdusetls = yes
    unknownlocal_recipient_rejectcode = 550
    The SMTP Log
    (I've bolded an email received at 13:50 as that is currently one of the emails in the queue, and it is addressed to me. It is now 14:36, so it's been in the queue for 45 minutes now).
    May 23 13:17:16 mail postfix/smtpd[1153]: disconnect from unknown[142.27.144.50]
    May 23 13:20:31 mail postfix/smtpd[1171]: connect from unknown[142.27.144.50]
    May 23 13:20:31 mail postfix/smtpd[1171]: E670A5E12E: client=unknown[142.27.144.50]
    May 23 13:20:31 mail postfix/cleanup[1172]: E670A5E12E: message-id=<[email protected]>
    May 23 13:20:31 mail postfix/qmgr[2532]: E670A5E12E: from=<[email protected]>, size=8890, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
    May 23 13:20:31 mail postfix/smtpd[1171]: disconnect from unknown[142.27.144.50]
    May 23 13:35:49 mail postfix/smtpd[1240]: connect from unknown[142.27.144.50]
    May 23 13:35:49 mail postfix/smtpd[1240]: 69A2D5E12F: client=unknown[142.27.144.50]
    May 23 13:35:49 mail postfix/cleanup[1243]: 69A2D5E12F: message-id=<[email protected]>
    May 23 13:35:49 mail postfix/qmgr[2532]: 69A2D5E12F: from=<CNETNetworks#[email protected]>, size=18494, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
    May 23 13:35:49 mail postfix/smtpd[1240]: disconnect from unknown[142.27.144.50]
    May 23 13:48:21 mail postfix/smtpd[1299]: connect from unknown[142.27.144.50]
    May 23 13:48:21 mail postfix/smtpd[1299]: 2644A5E130: client=unknown[142.27.144.50]
    May 23 13:48:21 mail postfix/cleanup[1302]: 2644A5E130: message-id=<[email protected]>
    May 23 13:48:21 mail postfix/qmgr[2532]: 2644A5E130: from=<[email protected]>, size=2438, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
    May 23 13:48:21 mail postfix/smtpd[1299]: disconnect from unknown[142.27.144.50]
    May 23 13:50:30 mail postfix/smtpd[1315]: connect from unknown[142.27.144.50]
    May 23 13:50:30 mail postfix/smtpd[1315]: 91EE25E131: client=unknown[142.27.144.50]
    May 23 13:50:30 mail postfix/cleanup[1316]: 91EE25E131: message-id=<[email protected]>
    May 23 13:50:30 mail postfix/qmgr[2532]: 91EE25E131: from=<[email protected]>, size=1966, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
    May 23 13:50:30 mail postfix/smtpd[1315]: disconnect from unknown[142.27.144.50]
    May 23 13:57:09 mail postfix/smtpd[1343]: connect from unknown[142.27.144.50]
    May 23 13:57:09 mail postfix/smtpd[1343]: 60FF95E132: client=unknown[142.27.144.50]
    May 23 13:57:09 mail postfix/cleanup[1346]: 60FF95E132: message-id=<[email protected]@SMS>
    May 23 13:57:09 mail postfix/qmgr[2532]: 60FF95E132: from=<[email protected]>, size=1017, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
    May 23 13:57:09 mail postfix/smtpd[1343]: disconnect from unknown[142.27.144.50]
    The email access log has already scrolled farther than the emails in my list, so I won't include that unless asked.
    Thanks in advance for any help offered.
    Jeff
    Intel X-Serve, X-Serve RAID, all kinds of other goodies   Mac OS X (10.4.9)   Support about 2000 Macs

    A wealth of information on configuring/troubleshooting your email server can be found at:
    http://osx.topicdesk.com/
    I know your issues isn't particularly with SPAM, however I would try to following this tutorial on "Frontline SPAM Defense":
    http://osx.topicdesk.com/content/view/38/62/
    This fixed many of my email server issues. I would try this first.

  • How to configure mwi for GDM (general delivery mailbox)

    Hello everyone
    I'm trying to configure mwi for GDM and am not having much success. I tried a couple of different ways suggested in a discussion here:
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3091135?tstart=0 but don't think I,m doing this the right way.
    This is what the thread states:
    x511 is a shared line with a corresponding GDM mailbox   (mine is x1007)
    x512 is a blast group with members x501 (phone A), x502 (phone B), and x503 (phone C)  *****I took 1008
    x511 is call forward all to 512
    The blast group at 512 forwards on no answer to voicemail
    x511 is assigned as a button on each of phones A, B & C
    When an incoming call comes in to x511 it is immediately forwarded to the blast group at 512, and as a result, x501, x502, and x503 ring.  After 15 seconds (or whatever the no answer timer is set to), the call goes to voicemail.  Because the call went to x511 first, it winds up in mailbox 511.  After the message is left, an MWI ON message is generated for x511, which results in the envelope icon being displayed next to the x511 button on each of phones A, B and C.
    Therefore If I change this to my configurations I think it would go like this:
    When an incoming call comes in to x1007(GDM) it is immediately forwarded to the blast group at 1008, and as a result, x1001, x1002, and x1003 and 1004 ring.  After 15 seconds (or whatever the no answer timer is set to), the call goes to voicemail.  Because the call went to x1007 first, it winds up in mailbox 1007.  After the message is left, an MWI ON message is generated for x1007, which results in the envelope icon being displayed next to the x1007 button on each of phones A, B and C.
    Here is what I tried:
    1: Configured GDM at extension 1007 and shared the extension to phones ext: 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004 (instead of above mentionned x511). This extension works and can retrieve GDM no problem.
    dial-peer voice 1007 voip
    description [-[ General Delivery Mailbox ]-]
    destination-pattern 1007
    session protocol sipv2
    session target ipv4:10.1.10.1
    dtmf-relay sip-notify
    codec g711ulaw
    no vad
    ephone-dn  8  dual-line
    number 1007 no-reg both
    label GeneralMail- x1007
    description General Mail
    name General Mailbox
    call-forward busy 1999                   *****Should call forward all to 1008 which is the hunt-group
    call-forward noan 1999 timeout 3    *****Should call forward all 1008. Therefore remove both commands and add the call-forward all 1008 (Correct???)
    hold-alert 30 originator
    2: Not sure what a blast group is but I believe it to be a parallel hunt group. Is this correct???
    ex: voice hunt-group 2 parallel (This will make all included phones dial at same time correct???)
          list 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004
    voice hunt-group 2 parallel
    list 1001,1002,1003,1004
    pilot ???  (not sure what to put here, i think it should be the pilot number 1008 correct???)
    pilot 1008
    Therefore this is what i got:
    voice hunt-group 2 parallel
    list 1001,1002,1003,1004
    pilot 1008
    Now I believe I need to create the dial-peer 1008 correct???
    dial-peer voice 1008 voip
    description [-[ Hunt Blast Group ]-]
    destination-pattern 1008
    session protocol sipv2
    session target ipv4:10.1.10.1
    dtmf-relay sip-notify
    codec g711ulaw
    no vad
    Next I think I have to create ephone-dn for the hunt blast group correct???
    ephone-dn  9  dual-line
    number 1008 no-reg both
    description General Mail
    name General Mailbox
    call-forward busy 1999                   *****Should call forward all to 1999 which is my voice mail correct???
    call-forward noan 1999 timeout 3    *****Should call forward all 1999 which is my voice mail correct ???
    hold-alert 30 originator
    Then last I would configure lines on the phones pointing to the ephone-dn 9 on all listed phones correct??? or am I totally lost?...lol
    ex: ephone  4
    device-security-mode none
    mac-address 0018.19B9.35BE
    username "operator" password 1234
    codec g729r8
    type 7961
    button  1:3 2:5 3:8 4:9  ***4:9 is the one correct???
    Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks very much.

    Thanks very much for the help Rob. This command does indeed take care of having my GDM
    light up but now if I try to send a message to the main phone line x1001 and leave a
    message it only has the enveloppe now and doesn't light up...lol
    It is a great command to know though...thanks a lot
    Any chance you know if I can have both the main line and the GDM light up when they receive messages in their respective extensions?
    ex:
    ephone 4
    device-security none
    mac-address aaaa.aaaa.aaaa
    username "operator"
    type 7961
    mwi-line 3   ****In my case this lights up the 1007 which is the GDM mailbox
    or
    mwi-line 1   ***now my main x will light up but not the GDM...lol
    button 1:3 2:5 3:8     ***Now for the personal mailbox
    ephone-dn  3  dual-line
    number 1003 no-reg primary
    label Operator-x1003
    description Operator
    name Sylvie Bombardier
    call-forward busy 1999
    call-forward noan 1999 timeout 10   ****worst comes to worst i'll get rid of the operator personal mailbox and call-forward all to GDM 1007 on that phone
    translation-profile incoming no-prefix
    Thanks very much again for your help. If you have any other ideas please feel free to add. I am definitely close to wrapping this issue. Funny cisco didn't configure GDM to also light up the phone extensions included in the GDM like the personal mailboxes when they receive messages.
    Thanks very much again for the help. I really appreciate it.

  • How to configure a error queue for weblogic jms topic

    Hi guys.
    I want to configure a error queue for weblogic jms topic. Wanted: The message goes to error destination when messages have expired or reached their redelivery limit.
    1. using jms transport configure proxy service:
    Retry Count :3
    Retry Interval:10
    Error Destination: ErrorTopic
    Expiration Policy: Redirect
    I tried use the proxy service to consume message from the jms topic . and generation an error in the proxy message flow. But the message didn't goes into the error topic.
    Any suggestions for this topic? Can anyone provide some helps or any useful links.
    Thanks in advance.
    Mingzhuang

    Mingzhuang
    I want to configure a error queue for weblogic jms topic. Wanted: The message goes to error destination when messages have expired or reached their redelivery limit.
    1. using jms transport configure proxy service:
    Retry Count :3
    Retry Interval:10
    Error Destination: ErrorTopic
    Expiration olicy: RedirectUnlike File/SFTP, JMS proxy service definition does not have the concept of Error Destination. To accomplish similar functionality go to JMSQ on (for which proxy is configured) server console (http://localhost:7001/console) and configure the Error Destination. Following URL will help in how to configure JMS Q.
    http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs103/ConsoleHelp/taskhelp/jms_modules/queues/ConfigureQueues.html
    http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs103/ConsoleHelp/taskhelp/jms_modules/queues/ConfigureQueueDeliveryFailure.html
    I tried use the proxy service to consume message from the jms topic . and generation an error in the proxy message flow. But the message didn't goes into the error topic.If every thing is configured as per above step, then the after retries, the weblogic server will put the message into JMS topic configured. Your proxy will receive from this topic.
    Let me know if we are not on same page.
    Cheers
    Manoj

  • HT204291 AirPlay Mirroring available for iPad first generation?

    AirPlay Mirroring available for iPad first generation?

    Airplay on iPad 1 is only available for some Apps like YouTube.
    Mirroring is only available for iPad 2 and 3.

  • Kerberos Configuration Manager for SQL Server is available

    This thread describes the Microsoft Kerberos Configuration Manager diagnostic tool for SQL Server. This tool is available for download from the Microsoft Download Center: 
    Download the  package now.
    About Kerberos Configuration Manager
    The Kerberos Configuration Manager for SQL Server is a diagnostic tool that helps troubleshoot Kerberos related connectivity issues with SQL Server, SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS), and SQL Server Analysis Services (SSAS). It can perform the following
    functions:
    Collect information on operating systems and Microsoft SQL Server instances that are installed on a server.
    Report on all Service Principal Name (SPN) and delegation configurations on the server.
    Identify potential problems in SPNs and delegations.
    Fix potential SPN problems.
    More information
    This tools helps troubleshoot the following exceptions:
    401
    Note: This error message is for http errors, SSRS errors, and some other similar errors.
    Login failed for user 'NTAUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS'
    Login failed for user '(null)'
    Login failed for user ''
    Cannot generate SSPI Context
    For more information about Kerberos Configuration Manager, go to the following related blogs:
    Released: Kerberos Configuration Manager for SQL Server
    Kerberos Configuration Manager updated for Reporting Services
    Kerberos Configuration Manager updated for Analysis Services and SQL Server 2014
    Reference from the following KB article: Kerberos Configuration Manager for SQL Server is available
    Elvis Long
    TechNet Community Support

    Thanks for posting, Elvis. Can you post this to the SQL Security forum too?
    Dan Guzman, SQL Server MVP, http://www.dbdelta.com

  • Functinal global variable for producer - consumer architecture

    Hi all,
    I am using a Producer - consumer architecture for my data acquistion as in the belwo diagram.. at some time i am stuck insde the while loop continously acquiring data .. is there any way i use one stop button as a functional gloabl variable and stop inside (consumer while loop) as well as producer architecture....
    Why i need this ?? so many design rules say that global variables are not a good idea...
    Thanks in advance...

    FGVs will work fine for your application.  You can also wire your error cluster to your stop button.  Your producer loop should throw an error 1 when the stop button is pressed, which will in turn stop your consumer loop.  But you would need a slightly different design for this.  Your consumer loop is designed to not advance until the stop button is pressed.  Instead of using and enum, you can use your producer loop to control the trigger to take a measurement.  No need for the while loop in the consumer loop this way.  You could set up your consumer loop to take a number of measurements, and then quit or take measurements for a certain amount of time.  Either way, you can stop your while loop when it times out.
    If you choose to stay with this design, a simple state machine archetecure might be better based on what I see.
    Reese, (former CLAD, future CLD)
    Some people call me the Space Cowboy!
    Some call me the gangster of love.
    Some people call me MoReese!
    ...I'm right here baby, right here, right here, right here at home

  • Configuration details for RFID devices in warehouse while delivery

    Please suggest me some configuration details for RFID devices in warehouse while delivery .
    Regards,
    Manish

    I read the "Config" in "– Once the Non-Cisco Devices are  moved to the managed state, it triggers the MIB II level of Inventory  for Inventory, Config and Image Management support and data collection." as "config management", meaning any retrieval of configuration informations possible through polling MIB II.
    OTOH, the "Config" in "– Config and SWIM functionalities are  not supported. Only system and interface information (MIB II) is  collected for Non-Cisco devices through Inventory." is probably referring to the act of deploying/pushing configurations to these non-Cisco devices.

  • Exchange 2010 - PerfMon - Messages Queued for Delivery = 2,147,483,649

    Our monitoring system is alerting Messages Queued for Delivery as 2 Billion messages and the value returned by PerfMon > MSExchangeTransport Queues > Messages Queued for Delivery also matches this number during some samples.
    I was wondering, what's going on here. When checking queues using Get-Queue cmdlet it doesn't show more than couple of messages in the queue.
    How do I get this fixed? This seems to be a known issue from thread http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/ac121f02-4359-4d18-b86a-9c9c78b320a9/perfmon-messages-queued-for-delivery-2147483764?forum=exchange2010
    Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.

    Hi ChaituNanl,
    Thank you for your question.
    By our search, I suggest we update Exchange to Exchange 2010 CU6 or later, because problem also seem to appear to Exchange CU5 or former.
    We could download the CU by the following link:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/240.exchange-server-and-update-rollups-build-numbers.aspx
    Notice: please note the version of  Exchange Service Pack
    If there are any questions regarding this issue, please be free to let me know. 
    Best Regard,
    Jim

  • Very first step in configuring RMAN for a Backup

    DB version:10gR2
    I am a DBA supporting applications development and i am not familiar with RMAN. This weekend we are going to Patch 10.2.0.1.0 to 10.2.0.3.0. Before that i am going to take a backup of the entire Database containing around 57 schemas(total of around 600gb).
    We don't have Tape drives. I am going to backup this up on three filesystems in the same machine. This instance is not running on ASM. What is the first step i should be doing in configuring RMAN for a backup?
    Edited by: user10583227 on Jan 27, 2009 4:50 AM

    Be careful, three filesystems doesn't necessarily mean the use of three channels. Could be more...could be less.
    Are you in a position to shutdown the database? If not, you'll also want to backup the archivelogs with BACKUP DATABASE PLUS ARCHIVELOG. You may also consider creating a Guaranteed Restore Point which would allow you to rollback your database in minutes if the upgrade fails.

  • Is it possible configuring an execution queue for a set of webservices?

    Hi,
    we have developed some webservices, writing normal methods and using servicegen to generate the webservices.
    We expected there would be a generated web.xml with some servlets to receive the calls for the webservices. So we could configure the excecution queue in it, but there are no servlets. It's almost empty.
    Is it possible configuring an execution queue for a webservice generated in this way?
    Best regards.
    Paco.

    Hi,
    we have developed some webservices, writing normal methods and using servicegen to generate the webservices.
    We expected there would be a generated web.xml with some servlets to receive the calls for the webservices. So we could configure the excecution queue in it, but there are no servlets. It's almost empty.
    Is it possible configuring an execution queue for a webservice generated in this way?
    Best regards.
    Paco.

Maybe you are looking for