Conflicting Dependencies [SOLVED]

I'm trying to build and install google-talkplugin from AUR.
I have checked/installed all dependencies except libgl.
I get the unresolvable package conflict error when trying to install it.
I don't want to remove nvidia-utils.
How to resolve this?
[jeff@Arch2009p2 ~]$ sudo pacman -S libgl
Password:
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
:: libgl and nvidia-utils are in conflict. Remove nvidia-utils? [y/N] n
error: unresolvable package conflicts detected
error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies)
:: libgl and nvidia-utils are in conflict
Last edited by jeff story (2010-10-03 00:23:37)

ngoonee wrote:Did you actually try to makepkg?
No, not prior to taking care of dependencies.
ngoonee wrote:It seems you're trying to resolve dependencies by hand,
Yes regarding dependencies.
I also prefer to make and install AUR packages by hand as far as never tried any of the "helpers".
Seems to simple to further complicate.
Last edited by jeff story (2010-10-03 02:50:13)

Similar Messages

KDE 4.3 and conflicting dependencies

hi,
I would like to upgrade my system to Kde 4.3.
I just write pacman -Syu kde, I write yes for every replace from kde to kde-meta.
But when It starts to upgrade it says:
error: unresolvable package conflicts detected
error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies)
:: kde-meta-kdeplasma-addons: conflicts with kdeplasma-addons-libs
Anybody can help me?
thank you a lot
cesare

http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=77260

Madwifi-ck conflicts madwifi [SOLVED]

Hi
a few minutes ago I updated to the new ck kernel (kernel26ck-2.6.21.ck2-1) but it seems that its madwifi module (madwifi-ck 0.9.3-1) conflicts with the madwifi module for the plain arch kernel (madwifi 0.9.3-4). Can't I install them both? I'll file a bug if someone can confirm that it is one.
EDIT: the bug was resolved in a recent update.
Last edited by Ramses de Norre (2007-05-30 20:04:36)

I have the same problem
edit: I haven't installed the new ck-kernel, but it tells me
looking for inter-conflicts...
:: madwifi-ck conflicts with madwifi. Remove madwifi? [Y/n] n
error: unresolvable package conflicts detected
error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies)
:: madwifi-ck: conflicts with madwifi
Last edited by jond (2007-05-28 18:51:37)

[solved] - conflicting dependencies - desktop stage of installation

Goodday,
Installation to hard drive using USB drive with CD 2013.03.01
Installation went well and arch is up and running in text mode.
As is usual for me with Arch distros (or any other for that matter) I choose KDE for the graphical side of things.
Previous installations of arch (December release and February release) have proceeded from this point with no problems.
Today's output from:
pacman -S kde kde-l10n-en_gb
produced - after showing me the packages to be downloaded and allowing me to choose a phonon -
error:unresolvable package conflicts detected
error:failed to prepare transaction (confilcts dependencies)
::kdesk-dev-scripts and kdesdk-scripts are in conflict
Has anyone come across this before? If so how did you get past this sticking point?
Thanks,
Hugh
Last edited by prokonsole (2013-03-06 20:28:39)

Awebb wrote:Wait a while. Your mirror is not fully sync with the new packages yet. This happened to me yesterday as well, but with different packages. Pick a more recent mirror and update using Syyu. The problem should solve itself, as all KDE packages move to the new version.
Well I waited while - overnight in fact.
Went back to my full fresh Arch install with no Desktop Environment
ran reflector to make sure I had a properly synced mirror
issued
pacman -Syyu
accepted the two files offered for today's update
then issued the command
pacman -S kde kde-l10n-en_gb
accepted the default which is everything
chose gstreamer-phonon when offered
then still get the conflicting files whic means the installation does not proceed
pacman -Ss kdesdk-scripts
produces
kdesdk-scripts 4.10.0.2
pacman -Ss kdesdk-dev-scripts
produces
kdesdk-dev-scripts 4.10.1-1
That they have different version numbers is fairly obvious.
Maybe another 24 hours will see the older package disappear.
edit: on my regular fully updated Arch install the package kdesdk-dev-scripts does not exist. So it looks like I can do without it!
another edit: emailed the maintainer who has fixed the conflict.
marking post as solved.
Hugh
Last edited by prokonsole (2013-03-06 20:32:40)

Conflicting files [SOLVED]

Hello,
I tried to upgrade my system and I get this error message. Any idea, how to fix this?
(87/87) checking for file conflicts [#####################] 100%
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
lib32-glibc: /usr/bin/ldd32 exists in filesystem
Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
[root@myhost mak]#
Thanks,
jmak
Last edited by jmak (2009-12-21 02:01:42)

munkyeetr wrote:
jmak,
Someone else may come along with a more elegant solution, but when I've been faced with that I situation I usually move (not copy, because it's complaining that it exists) the offending file somewhere safe, then try the upgrade again. Given the location you'll need to use root or sudo
# mv /usr/bin/ldd32 /root
That way if the upgrade still doesn't complete, you can move the file back to at least maintain the status quo.
Hope this helps,
Munky
Thanks a lot, this solved the problem.
jmak

Confused about testing/firefox dependencies [SOLVED]

In trying to install firefox-3.6.2 from testing, I get a message saying that there's a dependency conflict with fontconfig-ubuntu, which I installed some time ago in an attempt to improve my screen fonts.
When i check the explicit dependencies for firefox-3.6.2 in testing, I see only desktop-file-utils and xulrunner. When I check the dependencies for those two packages (desktop-file-utils in extra and xulrunner in testing), I still don't see mention of fontconfig.
Is there a way to work around this? I'd rather not undo my font display configuration just to test the current version of firefox, but I would rather use a firefox package for 3.6 than the mozilla.org package.
Thanks for any advice.
Last edited by dhave (2010-01-25 04:08:33)

Thanks very much for the advice. One question, though. If
wonder wrote:better update fontconfig-ubuntu to the latest version. WARNING. you have to rebuild yourself cairo-ubuntu to link against libpng 1.4.0 if you don't do that you'll have a broken system.
is "A" and
better revert to stock and after the upgrade is complete, use *-ubuntu again.
is "B",
are you recommending A or B?

PKGBUILD source conflict problem [solved]

I'm making a PKGBUILD for a game called noiz2sa. The problem is, it comes in two separate pieces - one is the binary and the other is some extra files and when extracted they both have the same name - noiz2sa. Because of this, when I put the both in the source= section and run makepkg, one of them inevitably gets overwritten. Is there a way to fix this?
Edit: I couldn't find a delete option so I'm marking this solved - after reading the PKGBUILD man page again, the noextract option was what I needed to work around this issue.
Last edited by Shirakawasuna (2007-05-07 07:56:21)

I wrapped it with double quotes and it worked , I've also added a note on the wiki page.
thanks

Loemu PKGBUILD, need help with python dependencies [solved]

I'm having a hard time determining the depends for this python application. It uses gtk and glade, but namcap is unable to determine dependencies for python apps, I think. It complains that I am including not needed depends. I found a requirements list here:
http://linux.softpedia.com/get/Utilitie … 4855.shtml
that might give some clues, but I'm still struggling to determine what's needed until I can get home and run the application.
My PKGBUILD in case you're interested and think you can help. I'm sure I need glade for python in the depends line, but I can't find it in AUR or with pacman.
# Contributor: robb_force <[email protected]>
pkgname=loemu
pkgver=0.1.1
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="A simple frontend for various game emulators, including XMAME, SDLMAME and Snes9x."
url="http://loemu.pegueroles.com/"
license="GPL"
arch=('i686')
depends=('pygtk>=2.6' 'libglade')
makedepends=('python>=2.4.0')
source=(http://loemu.pegueroles.com/dists/${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz)
md5sums=('d4cff1ef835ce19a9fd22cdaec47074a')
build() {
# Fix the paths in the scripts
cd ${startdir}/src/${pkgname}-${pkgver}
sed '/roms/d;/flyers/d;/snaps/d' -i setup.py
sed 's|share/games|share|g' -i setup.py
cd ${startdir}/src/${pkgname}-${pkgver}/${pkgname}
sed 's|share/games|share|g' -i Preferences.py
sed 's|share/games|share|g' -i Loemu.py
sed 's|share/games|share|g' -i Config.py
# Install the application
cd ${startdir}/src/${pkgname}-${pkgver}
python setup.py install --prefix=${startdir}/pkg/usr
Last edited by robb_force (2007-05-18 19:22:02)

Thanks for the response. I've added the working PKGBUILD to the AUR.
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?d … 1&ID=11093

Amule without wxwidget or x dependencies [Solved]

Hi.
I am trying to compile amule without wxwidget or x dependencies but to no avail. I am trying to install amule to a headless server with the intention of running amuleweb.
Below is the detail of my pkgbuild:
pkgname=amule
pkgver=2.2.4
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="An eMule-like client for ed2k p2p network"
arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
url="http://www.amule.org"
license=('GPL')
depends=('geoip' 'binutils>=2.17.50.0.18')
makedepends=('crypto++')
source=(http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/${pkgname}/aMule-${pkgver}.tar.bz2)
md5sums=('283c428dd2961a57f2691c455c845a42')
build() {
cd ${srcdir}/aMule-${pkgver}
./configure --prefix=/usr \
--mandir=/usr/share/man \
--enable-cas \
--disable-monolithic \
--enable-amule-daemon \
--disable-wxcas \
--disable-amule-gui \
--enable-amulecmd \
--enable-alcc \
--enable-webserver \
--disable-debug \
--enable-optimize \
--enable-ccache \
--enable-geoip \
--without-x
make || return 1
make DESTDIR=${pkgdir}/ install || return 1
Last edited by archlinuxsagi (2009-05-10 00:43:36)

The trick is to install wxwidget and install the base libraries.
I have submitted the wxbase iibrary and amule to AUR.
Below are the links.
wxbase : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26385
amule : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10499
I have tried mldonkey but the download speed is very slow.
Last edited by archlinuxsagi (2009-05-10 00:43:15)

How to install chrome dependencies[SOLVED]

Hello,
Could anyone advise me how to install the chromium browser. When I try to compile it, I run into a nightmare of dependency problems. I need lib32-gconf, then it depends on lib32-orbit2 and on and on and on.
If anyone managed to install chrome on kde 64 bit desktop, please give me a clue about the procedure.
Thanks,
jmak
Last edited by jmak (2009-10-14 19:43:32)

jmak wrote:
Hello,
Could anyone advise me how to install the chromium browser. When I try to compile it, I run into a nightmare of dependency problems. I need lib32-gconf, then it depends on lib32-orbit2 and on and on and on.
If anyone managed to install chrome on kde 64 bit desktop, please give me a clue about the procedure.
Thanks,
jmak
it is as easy as
yaourt -S chromium-snapshot
Although, there are a number of other versions available. To have a look at them all and decide which one to install you can
yaourt chromium
This will show you all available packages and then you can choose the one you want. After that simply follow the prompts. It will install all the required dependencies for you.
Last edited by Inxsible (2009-10-14 19:00:23)

Missing dependencies [Solved]

I'm trying to install wine but I don't know how to install the deps, can anyone explain how I install them? and is wine 1.1.44 the latest on Arch?
Last edited by Jack450 (2010-07-12 01:25:23)

Inxsible wrote:
Optional dependencies are just that : Optional.
You can choose to install them if you want or have the need to use those.
That's how Arch Linux is, philosophically. It's your job to tune your system the way you want it. It doesn't automatically do things for you (which other distributions may). As everyone else said, read the Wiki.

Kmldonkey and dependencies [Solved]

(first: sorry for my english)
ok i am old in GNU/Linux but new in Arch Linux, i want to install kmldonkey (pacman -S kmldonkey) but pacman want to install in my machine:
Targets: ocaml-3.10.0-1 gd-2.0.34-1 mldonkey-2.8.7-1 kmldonkey-0.10.1-4
Total Package Size: 47.06 MB
i don't want to install mldonkey because i don't want use mldonkey in my machine i have mldonkey in my server so i want use kmldonkey to connect with my server, i can install kmldonkey forcing to install kmldonkey only, without dependencies?.
Regards
insulae
PD i love pacman is the best package manager i tried!!! very good work guys!!
Last edited by insulae (2007-06-09 18:35:50)

hohoho i like ArchLinux every day a little more, i try with:
pacman -Sd kmldonkey and work perfectly!!

[Solved] Conflicting conflicts (and dependencies)

Attempting to update an AMD x86_64 system this morning:
07:55 Sun Dec 28
[root@arch64://~]# pacman -Su
:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
:: bluez-libs conflicts with bluez. Remove bluez? [Y/n] y
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: gnokii: requires bluez>=4.1
07:55 Sun Dec 28
[root@arch64://~]# pacman -Su
:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
:: bluez-libs conflicts with bluez. Remove bluez? [Y/n] n
error: unresolvable package conflicts detected
error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies)
:: bluez-libs: conflicts with bluez
I run LxDE and KDE3 (brand new install).
I'm dead in the water, of course. My system's running fine, but pacman updates are borked here ATM.
Last edited by grndrush (2008-12-28 14:34:21)

I did a pacman -Syy *right before* the bash display above. Trying to strive for brevity.
I'm very current - the only packages I *expected* to be upgraded were the kernel and klibc-udev. I was current otherwise as of 6 AM this morning. No idea where this is coming from.
FWIW, I use KDE3 as my primary D/E. It was installed after LXDE, but I didn't remove LXDE.
gnokii is required by kde3-kdepim, so we're talking a good 100 MB of disk trashing. If I have to remove and reinstall both (although the latter IS optional, I guess...).

[SOLVED]catalyst-utils and mesa-libgl are in conflict

I have this weird issue with pacman, I cant find mesa-libgl (so I cant remove it) and its in conflic with catalyst-utils.
the ouput of pacman -Syuu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
catalyst 9.4 KiB 552K/s 00:00 [#####################################] 100%
catalyst.sig 287.0 B 0.00B/s 00:00 [#####################################] 100%
core is up to date
extra is up to date
community is up to date
multilib is up to date
:: Starting full system upgrade...
warning: libpng12: downgrading from version 1.2.50-2 to version 1.2.50-1
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
error: unresolvable package conflicts detected
error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies)
:: catalyst-utils and mesa-libgl are in conflict
sudo pacman -R mesa-libgl
If I search for those mesa packages, noone are marked as installed.
Last edited by nullwiz (2013-10-03 00:52:07)

karol wrote:
nullwiz wrote:Its the same output. How the f*k would I know?
:: Synchronizing package databases...
catalyst 9.4 KiB 552K/s 00:00 [#####################################] 100%
catalyst.sig 287.0 B 0.00B/s 00:00 [#####################################] 100%
core is up to date
extra is up to date
community is up to date
multilib is up to date
:: Starting full system upgrade...
warning: libpng12: downgrading from version 1.2.50-2 to version 1.2.50-1
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
error: unresolvable package conflicts detected
error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies)
:: catalyst-utils and mesa-libgl are in conflict
is clearly not the same as
:: Synchronizing package databases...
catalyst is up to date
core is up to date
extra is up to date
community is up to date
multilib is up to date
:: Starting full system upgrade...
warning: libpng12: local (1.2.50-2) is newer than catalyst (1.2.50-1)
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
error: unresolvable package conflicts detected
error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies)
:: catalyst-utils and mesa-libgl are in conflict
The post I linked to https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 4#p1330764 says
You're doing an update and something is trying to install mesa-libgl which conflicts with the already installed nvidia-libgl.
Find out which package is it.
In your case it conflicts with catalyst-utils, not with nvidia-libgl.
You cant deny that they are really similiar, I didnt note, my bad.
How can I find that package?
I cannot remove catalyst-utils, as I need to use that..
Yes, I knew it conflicted with catalyst-utils that why I made a new thread. In that thread it got solved by waiting. For me, Im having this problem since some days, and now I got some time to post here and try to fix it.
thanks

[SOLVED]gnumeric-goffice conflicts with abiword-goffice0.8

Gnumeric updated today and apparently is preventing abiword from launching. The goffice versions conflict. I assume abiword will update soon and all will be fixed.
[chris@N281G ~]$ abiword
abiword: error while loading shared libraries: libgoffice-0.8.so.8: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
[chris@N281G ~]$ sudo pacman -S goffice
warning: downgrading package goffice (0.10.0-1 => 0.8.17-1)
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
:: goffice and goffice0.8 are in conflict. Remove goffice0.8? [y/N] n
error: unresolvable package conflicts detected
error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies)
:: goffice and goffice0.8 are in conflict (goffice<0.10)
edit: just had to install goffice0.8
Last edited by czubek (2012-12-24 17:25:50)

rightwingrb wrote:Also...I have no idea what "code" tags are but hopefully the above is acceptable ;-)
When posting configs, code or command output, please use [ code ] tags https://bbs.archlinux.org/help.php#bbcode
like this
It makes the code more readable and - in case of longer listings - more convenient to scroll through.
Please remember to mark the thread as solved https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=130309
Last edited by karol (2014-02-18 22:23:24)

Conflicting Dependencies [SOLVED]

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for