Consignment Reconciliation

Dear All,
I am trying to run Subcontracting Cycle.
I am doing foll Steps:
Create Subcontracting PO : 450000001
Ordered Material: M1 -quantity 2
Materials Sent: M2 - quantity 10
M3 - quantity 6
ME2O: 490000023 for Materials M2 and M3
I create Subcontracting Challan wrt Mat Doc 4900000023... Chalan number 1001
When i recieve Material M1 from the Vendor there is wastage of the materials M2 and M3 and hence M1 material only 1 quantity was posted in GR against PO. Material Document generated was 5500000034.
I did not capture any excise invoice during this.
Now i still have some quanitities of materials M2 and M3 pending as subcontracting Stock in my system, but it was lost by subcontractor during the processing.
I also am trying to reconcile the Subcontracting challan 1001 created earlier.
But which of the above material documents should i use to reconcile.
Please tell me whether i am following the right steps.
Also could anyone explain what steps to follow to reconcile the challan and what input material document should be given.
Please help. it is very urgent.
thanks.

Hi guys,
I found OSS notes Note 487162 - MRKO: Manual clearing of consignment liabilities account
2. You determine the taxes via tax jurisdiction code or you use NVV taxes which are not taken into account in inventory management during the consignment withdrawal but only in the consignment settlement, Transaction MRKO.
During the material withdrawal, you post without taxes, in the settlement, however, you post with taxes. Example: A material withdrawal item for DEM 100 is withdrawn from the consignment stock into your own warehouse. Taxation for the material occurs with 15 % NAV. Consequently, the following posting record occurs for the material withdrawal:
Own stock to consignment payables 100,-
Correctly, however, this should be
Own stock to consignment payables 115,-
Solution
The functions which exist in the invoice verification for the GR/GR clearing account do not exist in Transaction MRKO for the consignment liabilities account. This means that in some cases, this account is not cleared after the posting of the invoice and remains open. In this case, you either must not use such taxes or you must carry out a manual clearing between the consignment liabilities account and a suitable account in FI using Transaction FB01 or FB60. You can fill the 'Assignment' field on the detail screen as it is filled with invoice document and fiscal year in the posted invoice document. For this, consider Note 135238.
problem solved, thanks for your input .

Similar Messages

Customer consignment reconciliation report

Hi,
We are develping Customer consignment reconciliation report based on customer number, material, posting date, plant as other standard reports MB51, MB5B, MB58 is not having all the criteria at one place. This report will also check past stock for customer. How to i check for Material which are actual in customer stock. I have special stock indiactor W but when i run MB51, i get all the documents with various movement types, how can i check material which are actually in customer stock on given date.
Thanks.

thanks raga. MMBE does not having customer number kunnr and posting date field. i do need that.
i my custom report, i got all the documents from MB51, i need to filter the document which actually went to customer stock ( from mseg table), how can i do that.
Manish

Vendor Consignment - Account assignment

My client wants to settle vendor consignments in two steps:
1. In the first step, they want to post the consignment to an interim G/L Account, instead of the vendor recon account as follows:
Credit Interim G/L Account (instead of the vendor recon account)
Debit Consignment Payables Account
2. In the second step, they want the following posting:
Credit Vendor account (recon account)
Debit Interim G/L Account
By using transaction code OBYC I am only able to change the account determination for Consignment Payables Account. The problem is I do not want to change the consignment payables account. Instead want to change from the Vendor Reconciliation account to an interim G/L account. Please can anyone help?
(Note: SAP standard process settles consignment as follows:
Credit Vendor a/c (recon)
Debit Consignment Payables a/c)

MG,
I don't have answer to your query but you might have an answer to mine. I am looking for general modification for consignment payables account (KON). If you can help me, I would appreciate it.
Thanks
Syed

Vendor Consignment Clearing

Hello Experts,
Can you plese explain/show me the process of clearing consignment related GR/IR up to accounting? As from what I'm thinking, before the documents can be cleared in transaction F.13, it must be first cleared on the MM side. Because documents related to consignment still has a difference/balance on them that's why F.13 cannot clear them.
Can you give us the steps that needs to be done in MM side up to F.13 side?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. F.13
Thanks very much for your quick response,
Stiffler

Hi Stiffler
as far as I know clearing is available into FI side.
Please review documentation SAPF124:
"Clearing takes place when, for the group of line items selected according to the above criteria, the balance in document currency (for customers and vendors) or in update currency (for G/L accounts) is zero.
The date for clearing is the clearing date according to your selection specifications. In an update run, if the clearing transaction is successful, the clearing document number is specified."
The program groups the items according to 5 fixed criteria and 5 user criteria.
The fixed criterias are:
Company code
Account type
Account number
Reconciliation account number
Currency key
Special G/L indicator.
The five user are criteria are defined in OB74.
The program can clear the grouped items ONLY if the balance of the group equals zero in document currency or in update currency. So you should be sure that all the items are grouped according to the above criteria and the balance of the groups is zero.
In addition, if you set flag "Special processing of GR/IR clearing accounts" in variant F.13. So configurations in OB74 will be ingored and the program then automatically uses the EBELN, EBELP and XREF3 as grouping criteria.
If the values are different for the documents, they are not cleared and system worked as design.
Kind Regards
davide

Customer consignment reports

Dear all SAP gurus,
i need to create following reports which are consignment related.
kindly let me know your ideas about the same.
1. report on consignment fill-up
details required:
a) document no.
b) document date
c) customer's name
d) transporter's name
e) lorry receipt no.(L.R. No)
f) LR date
g) item description
h) good quantity
i) defective quantity
2. pending consignment quantities at customer (mainly used to evaluate consignment stock laying with the customer)
details required:
a) documenmt no.
b) customer
c) fill up date
d) item description
e) good quantity
f) defective quantity
g) amount of good quantity
h) amount of defective quantity
i) pending quantities
j) pending amount
3. Reconciliation report
report on a single consignment fill up document showing all the further issues and pick ups done against it.
showing document date, quantities, amounts etc.

Dear Mangesh
You have to develop a zee report by combining tables VBAP, LIPS & VBRP where all the datas required by you will flow.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Use assessment tax reconciliation issue

Hi all,
in my company there is an issue for use assessment tax U1, here is the example:
1. GR-- receive consignment stock
Dr        stock                                           3750
CR       Consignment Liability account       3750
2. IR --- invoice vendor ( we use ERS settlement )
DR      Consignment Liability account       3975
CR      vendor                                          3750
CR      Use Tax a/c                                  225
In reviewing the detail of Consignment Liability account, this results in a consignment receipt that does not equal the settlement invoice, leaving a debit balance in that account which equals to Use Tax A/C.
I guess my question is shall we calculate the use assessment tax on GR so that Consignment Liability account will balance? how to make this reconciliation work?
please advise, thanks!

Hi Nancy
How can you calculate the use tax during GR? I dont think it is possible at the stage of GR.
Use can calculate tax only at the time of IR.   But instead of posting the tax at the time of IR, it can accrued in a separate account so that your reconciliation does not get affected.
See below link from SAP help where the use tax accrual is discussed
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/fa/99bc16339811d3958d00a0c929f4c9/frameset.htm
Thanks
Ashok
Award points if this is useful.

Consignment stock is NOT getting displayed in the MC.9 trnasaction.

Hi experts,
We have some vendor consignement stock for some of our materials.
In inventory trnasactions like MMBE, MB54 it is corrctly displayed.
In the structure S032 also the consigment stock was updated. But we are not able to see this Consignement stock in the transaction MC.9
Mc.9 is showing ZERO consignment stock.
What is the reason for this?
How to correct this?
Please help us in solving this.
Regards,
Vijove

Hi,
Your question can be answered in this [forum Topic|ABAP Development; in a shor time..
Regards
Narin.

Changing vendor reconciliation account

Hi Experts
There are around 1500 vendors for whom we entered wrong reconciliation account. There would be around 20000 line items (uploaded line items, open line items and cleared line items).
Now I want to know what would be the best practice for correcting mistake.
1. Do we need to create new vendor master and transfer balances to new balances to vendor master using LSMW program
2. Do we need to change reconciliation account and run F101 every month end for next 8-10months unless all opening balance is knocked off.
Please let me know impact of above two options considering volume and reporting.
Meenu

If option 2 is acceptable to business, then I would suggest to go with second option, SAP allows to modify Reconciliation account with respective configuration change at master data setup. However, I am not sure, how system would react in following situation, please do a POC for same:
After recon account is changed from 1000 to 1001 at respective vendor master record, and you are processing a payment for against open item, which was recorded with 1000 recon account. In this case, just double check, whether system is able bring open items for clearing and also check it is adjusting against 1000 recon account.
Best regards

Change Customer Reconciliation Account

I need some assistance in verifying the steps for changing Recon account for a group of customers.
Scenario. We have a group of customers (about 60) who have postings to them. Some of the posting are open and some are cleared. We need to change the reconciliation account on these customers. We are running under ECC 6.0
I know how to change the reconciliation account on the customer. That is not a problem. The problem comes with handling the open and cleared items already posted to these customers.
I believe that at some point in time I need to run trans F101. In order to run this transaction I need to define an adjustment account using transaction OBBW. One of my questions here is do I define this as an adjustment account for both the old and the new reconciliation account or for just the old reconciliation account.
Now most of my questions relate to:
1. What are the steps required in order to run F101(FAGLF101 for 6.0)?
2. Is there something that I will need to do each month or will this be a one time situation only for me?
3. Will/are there any special steps required for clearing the open items once the reconciliation accounts have been changed?
4. Is there anything else (any gotchas) that I should be aware of?
Any assistance will be greatly appreciated.
Greg Brown
FI/CO Consultant

the thread you sent me answers part of my questions (namely the fact that I need multiple recon adjustment accounts and the basic steps for executing F101 (FAGLF101).
However, with regards to my other questions, here is what I am interpreting from the thread.
1. Is there something that I will need to do each month or will this be a one time situation only for me?
Assumed answer: I will need to run this every month until the balance of the old recon account for the customers in question is zero.
2. Will/are there any special steps required for clearing the open items once the reconciliation accounts have been changed?
Assumed answer: Apparently not. I will clear the old items (posted but not cleared at the time I changed the recon account) from the old recon account; clear new items (posted and cleared after I change the recon account) for the customer for the new recon account.
Am I correct on this?
Any additional help that you can provide me will be greatly appreciated.
Greg Brown

A/P & Consignment data pull to Planning Cube.....

I put this in "BC & Extractors" section, but did not get any response.....
Need couple of clarifications (brief background is provided.....):
1. We do DELTA extractions using 0FI_AP_3 adn 0FI_AR_4 to a base cube which includes both 'Open' and 'Cleared'
items. From this cube we do a DELTA load to a Planning Cube on a DAILY basis. We filter the data on Company Code
and 'Item Status' (OnlyOPEN Items) for Planning purposes. The key figure pulled to Planning Cube is '0DEB_CRE_DC'.
The bsae cube has data at Line Item Document level, where as the planning cube is only at Customer & Vendor level.
The question is - Will this Daily DELTA to Planning cube with filter on Open Item bring correct key figure? For example,
if the status of one of the items pulled as OPEN in earlier Delta changes to "CLEARED" the subsequent day, will the Key
Figure reflect the changes and show correct value? Is there any impact on the key figure due to the filter on Open Item?
My thinking is the key figure 0DEB_DRE_DC will reflect he correct number (adjsuted) since it is a summated key figure.
I could be totally wrong and want to understand this with comments from experts.
2. Has anyone worked with pulling Consignment (SMI) data into Planning cube? We pull this data using a generic extractor
from a SAP table "RKWA" with some logic. Since I pull A/P data that contains SMI & Non-SMI transactions. To avoid
Double Counting, how can I avoid bringing in the SMI transactions from A/P? There is no flag to diffferentiate the SMI /
Non-SMI transactions....
I am hoping someone has worked in these area to offer expert comments/ recommendations.
Thanks.. Shaun
Please post one question only once
Edited by: Vikram Srivastava on Aug 13, 2010 1:02 PM

Hello Lee,
For your first question as you are using the Filter on the status of the record,
lets say today the status is OPen and as a part of the filter the Delta will be able to pick this record as the status is OPen but if the status is changed to Closed tomorrow then this record will be completely ignored and hence in the next level target you will not have the right status at all.
So you need to plan your filters accordingly.
Hope this helps.
Thanks
Murali

Questions on AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation?

Dear all,
I know the purpose of "The AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation Report" provides a transactional breakdown of each accrual account with a net balance not equal to zero in a summarized or full transaction details version.
However, I found out that on of the Purchase Order has been done the PO receipt and created an invoice in AP (validate and accounted). But the report still showing PO is 0 and AP is 343,000 in AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation report. I am just wondering what I have done wrong suppose the PO and AP should be equal in that case.
Please advice.
Thanks.

Is there any miscellaneous transactions recorded in error to your accrual accounts,These miscellaneous transactions or transactions unrelated to purchase order receipts may be from Payables.

Error in updating OBNK Table ( Bank Statements and Reconciliations,Manual)

PLease advise ,
Bank Statements and Reconciliations,Manual Reconciliation
Client is receiving the following message:
Error in updating OBNK Table
Edited by: Philip Eller on May 20, 2008 9:03 AM

Hi Darpal Thiarha,
Please kindly refer to note 1132591 and note 1128677 to see if these are relevant to this issue. Upgrading to 2007A PL15 or above may avoid such issues relevant with the error 'Error in updating OBNK Table'.
Regards,
Candice Ren
SAP Business One Forums Team

Reconciliation to verify data in R/3 and BW

Hi Experts,
Can any one explain me how we will maintain reconciliation to verify the data in SAP R/3 and SAP BW are same or not after the data loads. Please explain all the sources that we have.
Thanks in advance
Mallik

For Unit Test, you don't need to reconcile all the records. So, I take a couple of selections. Using these, go to RSA3 in R/3 and extract the data and take sub-totals in Excel.
Now, go to Info Provider in BW, and using same selections, download the data in BW or BEx and take sub-totals again and compare both.
If the extractor is generic extractor based on View/Tables, you can go one additional step and get data from SE16 in R/3 to make sure RSA3 and Tables also match.
For Business Content extractor, its a little difficult is do this step because most of them are Function Modules.
This should be enough as long as your selections are good.
You can compare the data from RSA3. Run RSA3 and save the data in a file and then compare with BW.
You can compare the PSA data with R/3 to check whether your data transport is correct.But its very much important the end result (with data in Data Targets ex.Infocube...) should be reconciled with the R/3 data to check your update and transfer rules are working fine.
The second part is too tricky since you cannot directly compare the reports while the formats and grouping are different.
You can execute the reports in R/3 and apply the Update and transfer conversions (at least for random records) then reconcile with the BW data.
Take a look on the note: 543188
"How to Reconcile Data Between SAP Source Systems and SAP NetWeaver BI"
The Data Reconciliation procedure is still in the SAP action item for the future release.
But we can reconcile the data by extracting the reports and compare with the query output in Excel sheet.
Please check for a tool "Excel Compare" in google which is really useful in comparing excel files.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/7a5ee147-0501-0010-0a9d-f7abcba36b14
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/biw/how%20to%20validate%20infocube%20data%20by%20comparing%20it%20with%20psa%20data
By this method you can compare your infocube data with PSA ones...clearly, every changes in R/3 (due to user exit or, above all, BW-specific standard logic) is not taken into account...if you want to consider also this part (back-end), there is no std method and it depends from every specific flow!
also check in service.sap.com/bi
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/7a5ee147-0501-0010-0a9d-f7abcba36b14
One way is to define Remote Cube on the R3 data source and create multiprovider on BW with the Remote Cube and the BW target. Subtract the KF on R3 from the KF in BW - anything not 0 becomes an exception.
Sometimes the source on R3 is not as straight forward and we have had ABAP developers create summary table on R3 to compare to BW.
Actually one to one Data comparison between R/3 and BW is done during Integration Test phase. During this time we need to sit with R/3 team and work closely because they know exactly the numbers in R/3 side and which tables Data resides and all. After loading Data same data in to BW we compare the numbers between R/3 BW. If both the teams feel there is some data missing then we start the analysis. As a first stem we will see in the extractors then BW side during transformation like transfer and update rules.
Pleases see this document for more help
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/968dab90-0201-0010-c093-9d2a326969f1
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/biw/how%20to%20validate%20infocube%20data%20by%20comparing%20it%20with%20psa%20data
verifying the data which is coming from R/3 to BW system. That is called as Reconciliation.
That process is done with v lookup functionality.
Hope this helps and assihn points, if so
Regards
Raja

Duvidas sobre o processo de consignação em compras (MM) no Brazil.

Sap recomenda o uso de 2 códigos de material para tratar o processo de consignação para empresas no Brazil.
Um código é o material consignado de propriedade do fornecedor. O outro código de material é o material que passa a ser de propriedade da empresa após o faturamento.
Para esses materials existem diferentes códigos. Após a entrada da nota fiscal de faturamento de consignação pela recomendação é feito o movimento 309 (Transferencia de material para material).
Em nosso caso temos o material de consignação sendo utilizado em uma planta produtiva. O código de material que representa o material consignado de propriedade da empresa faz parte da lista técnica do material.
O MRP Cria as requisições deste material consignado de propriedade da planta. No entanto a requisição deve ser para o código do material de propriedade do fornecedor, pois criamos o pedido de compra para o código do material consignado pelo fornecedor e não para o material que será de propriedade da empresa.
Pergunta: Como poderemos transferir essas requisições do código da empresa para o código que devemos comprar do fornecedor??
Exemplificando:
Produto Acabado = Código Z
Materia Prima para produzir o produto acabado Z : Código do materia prima A
Na lista técnica do produto Z indica que precisamos de 2 unidades do materia prima A
MRP Cria as requisições para o materias prima A
Material consignado pelo fornecedor = Código material CA (É a mesma materia prima A, porém com outro código, para controlar o consignado)
Precisamos comprar do fornecedor o material CA, pois este é o material consignado
Como transferir a requisição gerada pelo MRP para que o código a ser comprado seja o CA e não o código A?
Obrigada.

Oi Rozie.
O que você quer dizer com "Sap recomenda o uso de 2 códigos de material..."? Não sei onde leu isso mas até imagino o motivo da sua colocação. Enfim... dê uma olhada antes nas best practices que estão disponíveis no marketplace sobre o processo de consignação para o Brasil.
Scenario Overview - EN
Business Process Procedure - EN
Configuration Guide - EN
Visão geral do cenário - PT
Procedimento do processo empresarial - PT
Abraço
Eduardo Chagas

Processo de recebimento de mercadorias em consignação industrial

Bom dia amigos,
Alguém tem o processo de entrada de mercadorias em consignação industrial implementado e funcionando no SAP ?
Pelo que vimos, ele trata tudo na mesma conta de estoque da empresa, e também não tem um processo standard para devolução simbólica dos itens.
Vimos que o movimento 821 não trata também esta entrada como estoque especial.
Alguém pode por favor nos dar algumas dicas de como foi tratado este cenário, as contabilizações aceitáveis no SAP, entre outros.
Grato a todos,
Alessandro

Oi Alessandro.
A devolução é feita via NF writer (J1B1N).
Você chegou a dar uma olhada na documentação disponível no marketplace?
Visão geral do processo
Procedimento
Guia de configuração
Abraço
Eduardo Chagas

Consignment Reconciliation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for