Consolidation Unit change from Group A to group B

When I drag consolidation unit from group A to Group in CX1X and then I run CXCd and error message popped stated below;
Entry cannot be posted :B/s and I/S balance of 1.7million.
I think it might be due to moving from one group to another group. please advise and it is very very urgent. What is the solution to this problem.? It is giving the same error when i try to drag back to the same group.
Thank you
Selvam

Hi,
Is it a Production system? In Consolidation if a Consolidation Unit is moved from one group to another it will have serious repurcursions. In one of the projects in test system we had this problem. SAP OSS Notes also suggest that Consolidation Unit - if transaction data is already posted - it should not be moved. Especially if Consolidation of Investments is configured it is going to be a problem.
Thanks
Murali.

Similar Messages

Consolidation unit change

Hello, dear colleagues !
The client works with BCS ver. 4 BW 3.5.
The earliest date in the system is 12/2006.
The client mainteins one legal hierarchy of companieis and one hierarchy of Profit centers (matrix scenario).
The client needs to make some changed in a profit center hierarchy from 01/2009, wich is to "moove" some PCs from one node to another in the same hierarchy.
The client does not want to create a new PCs hierarchy with the new structure, because in the BEX reports the user needs to choose the PC hierarchy, so they don't want to rely on user to remember wich hierarchy he needs to choose.
What is the best practice to do changes like this?
Thanks,
Lilia

The best practice in the situation is to:
- set parameters to 01/2009
- make hierarchy changes
- update cons group configurations for periods of divestiture/first consolidation according to SAP guidelines (be sure to get this right)
- for transfers create cons group organization change number (if applicable)
- post additional financial data for transfer or divestiture/acquisition
- execute tasks, including cons group changes tasks

Consolidation unit change - error: company already used in hierarchy

Hi all,
I have Company 1018 moving up in the hierarchy from congroup B to congroup A.
I have configured the divestiture date as 12/2010 for Company 1018 in congroup B.
When I try to add company 1018 to congroup A, I get errormessage that u201CCompany 1018 is already used in hierarchiesu201D that it exist in congroup B.
Could anyone tell me exactly how to add company 1018 to congroup A to avoid this error message.
I understand that Iu2019m not doing this in correct way.
Thanks in advance,
Sveinn Muller.

Hi,
SAP Note 702649 refers to when consgroup is moved
SAP Note 721376 refers to when cons.unit is moved, as it is in my case
I'm doing this according to below description in SAP Note 721376
the only problem is when I add 1018 in consgroup A in my example, I get mentioned error.
CG1
|- A First consolidation in 2003/012 (Start) divestiture accounting > (grater than) 2005/006 (End)
|- CG2
|- A First consolidation in 2003/012 (Start) divestiture accounting in 2005/006 (End)
Rgds.
Sveinn.

Consolidation unit defined as "Assigned end node" ?

Hi Gurus,
Has anybody used the "assigned end node" consolidation unit for top group bookings ?
Did you face any limitation / side effect ?
Many thanks!
Grégoire

Hi Grégoire,
Never tried it and never heard that anyone used it too. Would be interesting to hear an opinion of someone who has some experience with it.

Compare CSV - exclude if changed from this to that

I am using the Compare-object command to compare a CSV file. I am successfully using this to find the difference between two csv files:
compare-object $yesterdays $todays -Property EMPLID,GROUP_NAME -PassThru|?{$_.SideIndicator -eq '=>'}|
?{$_.GROUP_Name -eq 'FacStaffStudents14Spring' -or $_.GROUP_Name -eq 'Students14Spring'} | select * -ExcludeProperty MIDDLE_INITIAL,SideIndicator| Export-Csv $getquota -NoTypeInformation
How would I also exclude entries if they got changed from group name FacStaffStudent14Spring to Students14Spring or vice versa?

This question was actually answerable. I was able to get it figured out on another forum.
compare-object $yesterdays $todays -Property EMPLID,GROUP_NAME -PassThru | Group EmplId |
Foreach {
New-Object PSObject -Property @{
New = $_.Group | ?{ $_.SideIndicator -eq '=>' }| ?{$_.GROUP_Name -eq $FacStaffStudents -or $_.GROUP_Name -eq $Students}
Old = $_.Group | ?{ $_.SideIndicator -eq '<=' }| ?{$_.GROUP_Name -eq $FacStaffStudents -or $_.GROUP_Name -eq $Students}
} |
Where {
$hasChangedFromFacultyToStudent = $_.Old.Group_Name -eq $FacStaffStudents -and $_.New.Group_Name -eq $Students
$hasChangedFromStudentToFaculty = $_.Old.Group_Name -eq $Students -and $_.New.Group_Name -eq $FacStaffStudents
return -Not($hasChangedFromFacultyToStudent -or $hasChangedFromStudentToFaculty)
} |
Select -ExpandProperty New | ForEach-Object { $_.PURSE = "5"; $_ }|
Select * -ExcludeProperty MIDDLE_INITIAL,SideIndicator | Export-Csv $give -NoTypeInformation

"No Fiscal Year Variant assinged to consolidation unit" error for 3EC_CS_1A

Hi,
I'm getting following extraction error using RSA3 for datasource 3EC_CS_1A in R3 (4.7) system. Could someone shed some ideas on how to fix it.
No fiscal year variant assigned to consolidation unit 0000000000000000XX.
same error is coming for all consolidation units.
I checked ECMCT table and it has records in it.
I went to "Consolidation unit change" using CX1N and found out that above consolidation unit has our customer defined "standard fiscal year variant assigned" for the corresponding ledger listed in ECMCT.
What else might be missing & how to fix it. same error in both DEV & QAS. Appreciate any inputs
Hari Immadi
http://immadi.com
SEM BW Analyst

thanks for your post.
I checked T009 and see that fiscal year variants are maintained. K4 as well as "customer defined standard fiscal year variant". what else might be missing.
Hari Immadi
http://immadi.com
SEM BW Analyst

Error in el01 after MR unit change

Hi,
I need your help :
Partner with BP period 2011-01-01 to 2011-04-30.
An advance invoice has been made out with payment date 2011-02-28. Now BB plan is inactive.
Creating interim billing in 2011-03-05 (interim meter reading with billing)
MR unit change from 06.03.2011 (MR unit with BB cycle=0)
Error (el01) while creating MR order for installation (data: 20.03.2011)- interim with billing (02) ; message E9 035 'No objects
corresponded to the selection criteria'.
The only way is to do it with the device. Is there any way to do it for installaton?
From 2011-06-01 everything is OK. (for both)
Thanks.

Hi,
If you would like to enter the MR result with MR reason 02 - Interim billing, you do not need to create MR order. Just enter the installation number, date of MR. After that you can enter the MR results and save.
The MR order will be created immediately.
Best regards
Vlado

ECCS - G06020 First consolidation data for unit x in group G2 contains err

Dear Experts,
When I try to consolidate the investment, I got error message as below:
First consolidation data for unit E in group G2 contains error(s)
Message no. G06020
Diagnosis
Investment or equity data was collected for consolidation unit x for a date that is after the period of first consolidation in consolidation group G2. This makes all activities for this unit ineffective after the first consolidation of those activities. This can also affect indirect activities and organizational changes of other consolidation units.
Procedure
Correct the investment or equity data for consolidation unit x.
Then, I have no idea how to fix the problem. If i changed the investment or investee's equity, the data validation can not be successful. And from the message is said, the date could be critical, but I don't know, which date is incorrect.
The background information is described as below:
This is the first consolidation, I have run all tasks of data collection and elimination of AR/AP and Dividends.
The consolidation is based on purchase method.
Any suggestion will be appreciated.
Flex Yang

How can you solve this problem?, please guide me to solve this problem, i have similar problem, thanks.

How to change Syntax group and physical path in SARA from unix to windows.

Our customer migrate current current archiving server from Unix to windows
How to change Syntax group and physical path in SARA from unix to windows.

http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/8d/3e4ec2462a11d189000000e8323d3a/frameset.htm
you have to change
Logical Path Names
Logical file Names
Note 35992 - File name/directory for application archiving
hope this will help you
cheers
dEE

Getting Parent Consolidation Groups for a given Consolidation Unit

Hi Friends,
I am writing a program wherein i need to get parent Consolidation Groups and their Hierarchy levels for a given Consolidation Unit. If anyone has worked on a similar requirement, Please provide me with Function module or logic for the same.
Thanks
Surya

hi,
asset-nr = ILOA-ANLNR
Andreas

Consolidation Unit and Consolidation Group

Hello Experts,
We are actually in the blueprinting phase of the SEM implementation and i had a quick question at this stage.
For ex: Well we have individual company codes 0100, 0200,0300,1000,1100,1200,2000,2100,2200 and 2300.
0100, 0200 and 0300 being american company codes
1000,1100 and 1200 being european company codes
and similarly 2000,2100,2200 and 2300 are asian company codes
So would America, Europe and Asia be consolidation units then and then Global would be consisting of these 3 consolidation units.
Correct me if i am wrong anywhere - I am pretty new to SEM.
Thanks,
Nandita

Hi,
Each of the Company Code will be a Consolidation Unit. So, 0100, 0200, 0300 etc will be Consolidation Units in Consolidation. The integration between Company Code and Consolidation is Company created in FI.
Consolidation groups can be compared like Cost Center or Profit Center Groups. A group of Consolidation Units (and possibly Consolidation groups) will be come Consolidation groups. In your case, you can think of creating a Consolidation group each for America, Europe, Asia etc. If required you can create a sub group within a Consolidation Group.
All the Consolidation Groups can be linked at a higher level where the global consolidation required to be done. The top node and groups can be depicted as under:
   GLOBAL
        AMERICA
        EUROPE
        ASIA
There will not be any Consolidation Units under GLOBAL. Consolidation Units will be under America, Europe and Asia.
Thanks
Murali.

Account Group change from Bill to Party to Sold To Party

Hi Friends,
I cannot change the Account group from BP( Bill to party to Sp (sold to party which I need to do) from TC XD07, but giving error msg "The planned change is not allowed as the following field groups would be masked by the new account group".
Can anybody tell me how I can do this.
Thanks N Regards,
Siddhartha

hello, friend.
the reason for this is that the configuration/settings for the fields between the account groups 0001 (sold-to) and 0002 (ship-to) are not the same.
you need to go to IMG > Log General > Business Partners > Customers, go to the account group 0002 and make the field settings the same with 0001 before you can change account groups for customers.
just be sure to revert back to the default 0002 settings after account has been changed.
regards.

Change colums from group to group in Reports 2.5 (Developer 2000)

Hi
I know there is a easy way to do it in reports 6i, simply dragging and dropping the colum from group to group. But in 2.5 it doesnt work.I suppose there is a way to do it but i dont find it
Thanks a lot

Hi,
In reports 2.0 we have the "Reports Generator Version 2.0" to do this but do we have anything of this sort ( to convert rpt to rex) in reports 2.5 it tells something about case dictionary and stuff...
I'am not able to get exacltly what U are telling could U explain a bit U can mail me
to "[email protected]"
please
thank U so much
regards
Naresh
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by nirali:
Hi!
1.sccs edit .exp/inp
- Check out most recent version from SCCS(source control)
2. pasterex *.exp *.rex - Add special characters so this report can be loaded into the DB.
this will generate *.rex file.
Nirali<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
null

Country grouping changed from '99' to its own grouping.

Hi Experts,
We are planning to change the international country grouping ('99') for some of the countrties to their respective country groupings (say '20' for Norway, '23' for Sweden ). Currently the countries attached to international country grouping are working fine.
Now, if I have to change the grouping as mentioned above, what are the things I have to take care? Can you please provide me the detailed checklist for the same?
Also, we are not using Time and Payroll for international countries and it is taken care by a 3rd party vendor.
Thanks & Regards, SWapnil Mishra

Hello,
To get the correct grouping value assigned to employees feature IVWID (and IGMOD) need to be configured properly.
Then to correct/update employees data the following report will need to be run
Programs RPUFACECPRFN and RPUFACEVIEKN and program RPUFIXDS correct the missing fields on personel numbers.
See notes 845592 and 783499 (they refer to CE and activation of old and new framework but I think it will help also in your case).
Best regards
Sarah

Total transfer of equity consolidated unit using organizational change

Hi,
We have a scenario where we are doing total transfer of an equity consolidated unit (100% owned) from one company(old parent) to another (new parent)
The new parent is one level above the old parent in the hierarchy.
We've used organizational change logic and have set the divestiture dates/flag in the sender consolidation group and accordingly first consolidation dates/flag/OC number in the receiver consolidation group.
The investment AFD is submitted with "total transfer" with OC number.
There are multiple scopes of reported data for equity method in our configuration.
Each scope(equity pickup) is inturn created by reclassifying several equity accounts to a single BCS only item(the scope item)
When we run COI, the system posts one total divestiture document at the old conso group (where old parent is situtated) and posts a first consolidation, total divestiture, total transfer documents at the new conso group level (which is one level above the sender conso group)
The total divestiture document at upper level is reversing the divestiture document posted at old parent.
The first consolidation document jas only statistical items posted in it.
The real document to check is the "Totals transfer document" which actually reads the investment (at old parent and new parent) , the equity holdings adjustment data(the scope items) and adjusts the investment in subs at new parent with offset going to divestiture account but of double the value than the expected scope vlaue.
Issues faced:
Q1. Consolidation group change tasks (at PL02, 12, 22) are not posting any documents. Is there an issue? Since I am using these tasks for the first time and dont know if this is possible.
Q2. The total transfer document is reading the equity holdings data as double the expected value( for each of the scopes of equity method). What could be the possible reason? How to fix this?
Q3. I would appreciate if someone can clarify what kind of postings the system makes as part of divestiture/transfer in case of equity consolidated unit transfer.
Please help!
Thanks,
AJ

Thanks Dan.
Appreciate if you can help on the below points as well.
1. As part of divestiture/transfer postings: The system is reversing some Previous Year(PY) equity accounts into themselves. How can we get the system to eliminate them by posting to COI Clearing account. Basically, we dont want the PY accounts to be touched?
For the Retained earnings - PY account, the system is actually posting to COI clearing account.
These PY accounts are part of some scopes for equitization.
Is there any link between the "balance carry forward" - list of items table and the divestiture postings?
Does the system check this table while posting/reversing the equity(PY) accounts?
2. I want to understand the sequence in which the system posts the documents at the old parent and new parent (group) level.
The same activity number is there for Total Divestiture, total transfer documents posted at new parent level and total divestiture document posted at old parent level.
Does the system follow bottom up approach? Thereby creating total divestiture document at old parent level.
Followed by documents at upper level (new parent level)
Also , at the upper level(new parent level), does it post documents in the way they are shown in the log? (We havent changed the default sequence maintained in UCWB - COI settings). so it will post first consolidation doc, followed by total divestiture, followed by total transfer docs at the new parent level?
Is this the reason for the double value being posted at new parent for equity holding data?
Will studying the statistical items (corresponding to eliminated equity holding items) be relevant here to understand why at upper level there is double the value being posted by system?
Thanks.

Consolidation Unit change from Group A to group B

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for