Contract net value problem

Hi,
  I created a  material PO for net value 100 eur for a contract
of target VALUE 1000 eur.Now i create a GR for
that PO for 50 EUR.Now i set the delivery completed
indicator,then i can set contract net value gets updated to 50 EUR.
Now i created a service contract and service PO with
same target value and net value
But in the case of service po,i create a service entry sheet for 50 EUR,then contract net value is not getting updated to 50 EUR.
Why it behaves differently for material and service POs?

I have Simulated your issue..
I have Created a Service Contract with Line Item 'D" for 1000 INR.
Later I have raised release Order for 200 INR..
as soon as the Release Order was approved , the Net Value in Contract updated to " 200 INR"..
Still SES is pending for that...
If you want I can send you screen shot...

Similar Messages

  • Contract net value for Header Statistics is not correct

    There is issue with value contract. The net value for Header Statistics is not showing correctly for some contracts. Especially, when we delete the PO line items or reverse all entries (GR and IR) for PO line item.
    Contract has one line with account category ‘U’. The target value is 300,000.00 and total quantity released to date is 160,000. The net value for Header Statistics should be 140,000 but it is showing 600,000 which is over (double) the target value and user cannot release any further PO reference to this contract.
    Earlier I defined net price for line item 300,000 and I changed net price to zero and execute report RM06ENP0 but it doesn’t work.
    Please share your experience and thoughts.
    Thanks,
    Shah.

    Hi Jurgen,
    There are few Purchace orders with multiple line items and each line item for Purchase orders referencing the same line and same contract.
    There is only one Purchase order has two deleted lines against this contract.
    Theses deleted line's net price has changed to zero and there is no PO history.
    Contract released order value is correct as there is only one line, but net price is wrong. and user is getting error for target value is excedeed by $nnn when trying to create purchase order.
    Thanks,
    Shah.

  • ML81N Net Value Incl tax problem

    Dear SAP Guru's,
    Need your help in this issue please.
    When we try to make service entry sheet vide transaction ML81N for any  vendor  the amount calculated for payment is exactly half of the ordered value.
    In short for all Work orders, when we make service sheet we face the above mentioned problem, whereas for all Purchase orders when we make GIR, the system calculates the correct figures.
    Could any of you'll please suggest some solution for the above issue.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Ashok

    Hello Ashok,
    please check the purchasing condition schema in your corresponding purchase order.
    the subtotal for the net value should be calculated with condition subtotal 7 - probably this is missing from your
    schema and there is an additionally subtotal 9 calculated which might be the cause for this problem.
    Please compare the settings with the settings from the standard schema RM0000.
    Regards,
    Edit

  • Sales order should not copy the net value from contract

    Hi,
    When we are creating the sales order,Where we can maintain that sales order should not copy the net value from contract.
    Regards
    Prabudh

    Hi,
    When I am creating the sales order with reference to contract,it's copying the net value and quantity from the contract.
    But I want  that sales order should not copy the net value and quantity from the contract and user can take new required quantity at the time creating the sales order.
    Regards
    Prabudh

  • Problem relattted to PO Net Value?

    Hi All,
    PLz Tell me from where the net value field in PO item  conditions tab  gets updated?

    hi,
    It gets updated from the conditions like PBXX defined in the condition table in the spro and added conditions in the conditions tab in the PO...
    Net Price = Gross price - discounts etc..(ie. other conditions)...
    SPRO >> MM >> Purchasing >> conditions >> define output determination..
    Regards
    Priyanka.P

  • Differences between Contract Cumulative Value an Release Orderes Value

    Hi All
    I have found differences in:  EKPO (PO Items)  and  EKAB (Release Orders) tables vs. Cumulative Target Contract value.
    The total amount in EKPO net values is grather than Cumulative Target Value in Contract, in EKAB net values as well.
    Do you know the considerations that the system are taking?....because the Cumulative value must not be exceeded
    Thanks for your tiime.
    Regards
    Mauricio

    I have found the issue, the delivery complete indicator restore the Cumulative Amount in Value Contracts (Quantity = 0). After that, a new PO could be created with Agreement link limited for the amount restored.
    So the all PO generated related with the contract could exceed the Cumulative Amount established in contract
    Thatu2019s a problem because All PO could be received even though the delivery complete was activated
    This behavior is only for Value Contracts
    Saludos
    Mauricio

  • Milestone Billing, Billing date value exceeds Net Value

    Hi all,
    I have a issue related to Milestone Billing. Here billing dates are entered manually. Say for eg for Rs.1000, 4 billing dates will be entered for 25% based on completion of a project.
    Now the problem here is , The net value will be 1000 [contract amount] but system is allowing to enter more than Rs.1000 in milestone billing dates. means i can enter more than 100%. how to restrict this. Do we need to use any user exit.? I have tried all standard ways.
    Thanks & Regards
    Praveen

    Dear Praveen,
    You can put a logic to compare the Total Value and also the individual milestone amount and trigger a error message while saving the sales order.
    This seems the only way.
    However lets wait for the experts to comment on this requirement.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Hegal K Charles

  • Contract Version not created when WK Contract (target value) is changed.

    Hi there,
    Problem with the Version Management on a WK Contract.
    When we change the contract targ. value on some of our contracts the new version is not created accordingly. This is only on some of our contracts
    Version Mgmnt is correctly configured and the release strategy in place to be triggered when the target value changes. It does work correctly for some contracts.
    We receive the following message when we change the targ. value:
    "No new version created because a message has not yet been transferred"= Message 027
    Can anyone help or advise?
    Many thx.

    We receive the message on some of the contracts.
    Therefore it can't be due to the output

  • Contract Release Value is not updated with Confirmation or Invoice value

    The release value for a contract in SRM EBP shows the value of purchase orders created using that contract.  It does not take into account confirmation and/or invoice values.
    For example I create a PO for 10 items at £100/each using Contract ABC.  The total value of the PO is £1000 and the release value contract ABC would be £1000.  If I then only confirm and invoice 5 items (£500) for the PO, the release value of contract ABC stays at £1000 even though I would expect it to update to £500
    Therefore the release value of the contract could be incorrectly overstated if purchase orders are created against the contract but not actually invoiced/confirmed for their total value.
    Please could you confirm the correct functionality and how I could find out the the true invoice value of purchases made using a contract?

    Hi
    <u>Which SRM and R/3 versions are you using ?</u>
    <b>Meanwhile, please go through the following SAP OSS Notes, which will help in this case -></b>
    Note 622045 Net value in release overview of contract is incorrect
    Note 493519 Release quantities are not updated
    Note 1108322 BBP_CONTRACT_CHECK wrong calculation of values
    Note 1102886 Contracts: Lesser Field length for Target Value
    Note 1082548 Check of Released quantity and released value in contract
    Note 656181 Release synchronization of releases on services
    Note 874920 Currency not allowed to be changed for a 'Released' Contract
    Note 703771 Resetting release values during purchase order item deletion
    Note 643823 BLAREL: Incorrect values in service segment
    Note 519879 BBP_CTR_MAIN: No message when values in Contract are reset
    Note 520734 Target value not converted if currency is changed
    Note 528897 Documents not displayed in contract release order overview
    Note 430373 BBP_CON_MNT: No releases available
    Note 491993 Entry of contracts with target values
    Note 437491 Purchase contract: Incorrect update of the call-off values
    Note 406799 BBP_CON_MNT: Fields after contract release ready for input
    Note 398168 Purchase contract: Target value is not changed
    <b>Do let me know.</b>
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Static Credit Limit Check for Sales Orders - Net Value vs Credit Value

    We are testing order credit check and we have run into a problem with the Static Credit Limit Check.  The Static Credit Limit Check is set to use both Order and Delivery Values.  SAP uses the values in S066 and S067 to determine what values it uses to check against the credit limit.  Standard SAP uses the confirmed quantity times the credit price to get the order values - this is the credit value. 
    So the problem is, once an order is released it is set up so it does not go back on credit hold, so anything which is not confirmed (but could be) it a potential credit value which is unaccounted for in the credit exposure and the customer can go over the credit limit.
    Additionally, we run AFS and have items which are rejected with a J0 rejection code (unconfirmed) which have the potential of being confirmed and shipped and we want to include these items in the value of the order which is being checked against the credit limit (along with the deliveries, invoices and receivables).
    Here is a quick example.
    Customer has a credit limit of $100 (no deliveries, invoices or receivables - to keep it simple)
    Order 1 is placed with a credit value of $50.00 but a potential value of $100 (the other half is J0) - this passes the credit check since $50.00 is less than the limit.
    Order 2 is placed for $50.00 and has a credit value of $50.  This also gets approved.
    At this point, the credit limit used is 100% (based on standard SAP)
    Then Order1 backorder is confirmed and the new credit value is now $100.  This order now puts the customer over their limit and if the order had been released would not go back on credit hold and therefore the customer is not over their credit limit by 50%.
    What I want is for Order1 to be credit checked for the $100 not the $50 so the exposure is correct.
    Does anyone have any suggestions as to how we could use the Net Value of the order to perform the static credit check?  And any thoughts on how to determine the correct credit exposure (open order value plus items which are J0, plus deliveries, plus invoices, plus receivables)?
    I am thinking about a Z table to track the adjusted values on the orders and then use one of the customer checks to do a static credit check with the adjusted value.  And for the exposure, use the adjusted value to recalculate the values in F.35 to show a more accurate view of the credit exposure.
    Does anyone have an easier way to do this?  Any advice is appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Suzanne

    Hi Suzzane,
    In the scenario that you have provided, in the first order items worth 50$ are rejected. Hence standard SAP will not take this into account as this item is rejected.Two solutions can be provided here:
    1) The line item can have a delivery block instead of  a reason for rejection.This way the 50$ will get accounted.However, if this is against customer norms as this will appear in the order acknowledgment, this cannot be used.
    2) User exit can be used where a credit check can be triggered once the document value changes, even though the document has a released status.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    Vinu

  • Sales Condition, but not totalling to net value in SO

    Hello,
    We have costs which we need to post to certain GL accounts, to do this I created new condition type (not have statistical ticked in procedure). This is for royalty process, whereby every SO which we sell to every customers, we will pay 3% of sales to another party.
    - Problem, if dont tick statistical, wrong values get posted to customer because we're adding 3% to credit customer.
    - If tick statistical, values dont get transfered to accounting.
    Is there any better way we can use to not allow values to be totalled into net value in SO, but still be able to bill and post to accounting?

    You can achieve this requirement by creating New Condition Type ( suppose XYZ ) with Calculation Type as Percentage & Plus/minus as -ve . Add this Condition Type below the Condition Type for Royalty Process (suppose ABC ) with Step Number as the one of  Condition Type ABC in From Column in the Pricing Procedure.
    You would have to mention the Account key for Condition Type ABC & maintain 100 % Condition Record for Condition type XYZ & no Account key should be assigned against Condition Type XYZ.
    Best Regards,
    Ankur

  • Net Value Key figure in Service Level: Order Items OSD_C12

    Hi,
    I'm trying to set up the Sales Analysis Business content for my Customer but I don't get the Net Value key figure to work. My customer uses TS as price unit (1 TS = 1000 PC). The net price are set to 35EUR / 1 TS. In BW the Net value don't consider the price unit and the Net value 3700EUR on the order is displayed as 3 700 000EUR.
    Another problem is that the price is not always defined in TS. Some times the price is defined by PC.
    Regards Kristoffer

    Hi,
    I'm trying to set up the Sales Analysis Business content for my Customer but I don't get the Net Value key figure to work. My customer uses TS as price unit (1 TS = 1000 PC). The net price are set to 35EUR / 1 TS. In BW the Net value don't consider the price unit and the Net value 3700EUR on the order is displayed as 3 700 000EUR.
    Another problem is that the price is not always defined in TS. Some times the price is defined by PC.
    Regards Kristoffer

  • Not able to get net value in billing document vf01.

    Hello Sir,
    I am trying to create an invoice for  milestone billing plan. I have maintained copy controls  at item level as follows
    coplying req.  002
    vbrk/vbrp        001
    pricingtype     D
    billing qntty     A
    while i save contract and trying to create billing document  system is not able to show net value in billing document. 
    Please guide me to get the net value in the billing document.
    looking forward to reply.

    Sir, May I know what is the process to confirm milestone billing. as per my knowledge we release billing block and then billing document is processed.
    In my case even if i release billing block billing document succesfully created and saved but net value seems zero.
    I am not aware of complete proces.
    reply would be appreciated.
    thanks

  • Error in net value

    hi all,
            in pricing procedure in i am using two condition type one is PR00 and other is TSP1 transporting cost. the netvalue is 100 + 13.50 = 113.50 is getting calculated in pricicng procedure. But the issue is only 100 is displayed in net value field of sd document and when billing is done only 100 is billed. plz give the possible solutions.
    Thank regards
    jagan

    Hi Jagan,
    If your problem is only in the output that is getting printed, then in the pricing procedure you will have to select the total of the price (PR00+TSP1) for printing and deselect Condition Types PR00 and TSP1 for printing if you want to print 113.50 as output. Or you can select both condition type so that you get the output of both value.
    If the problem is only one Price is being reflected then check in the condition type of TSP1 whether the Condition category is maintained as Surcharge. If it is maintained as Price then also the value will not reflect in the Net value. The reason being there can be only one Price in a Pricing Procedure.
    Hope this should solve the problem.
    Regards,
    Karthik.
    Edited by: KARTHIK KRISHNAN on Jun 9, 2008 2:06 PM

  • Rounding off Issue (Net Value not equal to Net Price * quantity)

    Dear Gurus,
    Here is an interesting issue.The default calculation done in the pricing procedure is two decimal places.Now we consider a real scneario,consider the net value of 324 quantities of an item calculated is 36,049.86 .When it is divided by quantity  the resulting value of net price is 111.265 but the system shows 111.27 by rounding it off.
    Now here comes the problem,my client needs the rate to be shown on the order script to be two decimal places and the net value should be equal  quantity * net price.So if we apply this,
    324 * 111.27 = 36051.48
    But the net value calculated by the system is 36,049.86.So it can be consluded that:
    "Quantity * Net Price Shown is not Equal to Net Value calculated by the System"
    Need an urgent resolution,project is stuck on this
    Regards,
    Sam Ahmed
    Edited by: Lakshmipathi on Nov 3, 2011 12:14 PM
    Please dont add URGENT in subject or in your post

    Here is the pricing procedure,
    We start with the amount condition types
                                            Unit Price        Units Condition Value
    ZMRP     MRP                     1,700.00           10     PAC     55,080.00      
    ZTRP     Trade Price     1,445.00           10     PAC     46,818.00      
    ZDPR     Dist. Price     1,445.00           10     PAC     46,818.00         (GL)
    Using Trade Price we apply the product discount of 23%
    ZPRD     Product Discount     23.000-     %                    10,768.14-
    Then we send discount amount to the gl by using condition type ZDIS
    ZDIS      Discount Value     100.000-     %           10,768.14-      (GL)
    tHE RESULTING NET VALUE IS  36,049.86      as 46818.00 - 10,768.14
         Order Item value     111.27      1     PAC     36,049.86      
    And the Net Price is 111.27

Maybe you are looking for