Controlling interchange id in UNB

We have a situation where we send EDIFACT D96A INVOIC messages from BPEL to B2B for transport with SFTP to different external parties. The problem is that both the host and some of the external partners represent multiple companies and use multiple identification schemes (always EDI Interchange ID but different values). We have defined the trading partners in B2B with more than one EDI Interchange Id. That is fine and incoming messages are recognized correctly. However, when we send outgoing invoices the UNB segment is incorrect.
Looking at the wire message for an outgoing invoice the headers are fine:
TO=correct_to_value
FROM_PARTY=correct_from_value
But the payload is not:
UNA:+,?*'UNB+UNOC:3+wrong_value:ZZ+wrong_value:ZZ+080904:1124+1025+ '
Real values removed for privacy reasons.
Basically the override value from document protocol "Interchange Sender Identification" always seems to be used for the host and if that field is undefined the value in the UNB becomes blank!
How should this be done? Is it possible to set the override to a macro of some kind (i.e. #FROM_PARTY# or #TO#), or what is the proper procedure? Is it a bug - it feels odd that the id is set to space if there is no override?

Hello Erik,
There are two ways used to overide the Interchange Sender ID in the Document Protocol Parameters for CONTRL. The first way is to use the remote tp delivery channel in the agreement where the Exchange Protocol Parameters for EDI Interchange Sender ID has been set. This way also applies to other documents.
The second way is to set oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.edi.FAInternalProperties=true in tip.properties. When this is set, there will in Internal-Properties in the xml instance which overides the Interchange Sender ID in the Document Protocol Parameters.
Rgds,Ramesh

Similar Messages

Validating UNB and UNH segment in EDIFACT using Seeburger BIC

Hi Experts,
Just a small thing if someone can help with. What's happening is if an interchange comes with wrong interchange number in UNB vs UNZ segment BIC is actually rectifying that automatically and it makes the UNZ same as UNB. However I don't want BIC to do this.
Any suggestions on how can i stop this from happening please?
regards

Hi Prateek,
Thank you for a quick help I will try that in the morning and I am positive that should settle it.
Hi Rajesh,
That was my understanding too. However for UNH segment the trailer is UNT so if UNH had 100 and UNT had 101 BIC is not throwing an error but it is not correcting it either. But I think I can handle it in messag mapping and itsn't a big deal I was meant to do that anyway.
However for UNB the trailer is UNZ and if I had UNB = 500 and UNZ = 499 BIC will automatically correct and I am positive the reason for that is what Prateek mentioned. And hence by the time I get it in Integration Engine I have no way of knowing it was incorrect. This odd behaviour it is almost like it is set to auto correct.
For UNT it is not doing the right thing either, e.g. if I had UNT = 36 but the real count should have been 38 it will actually autocorrect it to 38 and actually let it pass to message mapping, however the Control it is generating it is rejecting the message based on UNT was not correct.
But for the first two it even creates a control with status 'accepted'.
Thank you guys I will close the thread in the morning if things are working
regards

Segment IEA(Interchange Control Trailer) EDI error

Hi
WHile valiidating the EDI 875 using SpecBuilder I am getting following error
Segment IEA(Interchange Control Trailer) at guideline position (N/A) is missing. This segment's standard option is Mandatory.
This segment was expected after:
Segment Count: 22
Character: 730
My EDI file is as follows
ISA*00* *00* *12*8283234100 *08*9267710000 *081103*1315*U*00401*000271883*0*P*>
GS*OG*8283234100*3014302200*20081103*1315*271883*T*004010
ST*875*171889
G50*N*20081103*236772
G61*BD*GINASHARPE/KIMSCEARCE*TE*8287254301
G62*02*20081106
NTE*ALL*IMPORTANTPOSHIPPINGINFORMATIONatWWW.MERCHANTSDISTRIBUTORS.COMVENDORINFO
G66*PP*M*2
N1*BT*MERCHANTSDISTRIBUTORSINC.*9*0069968880200
N3*P.O.BOX2148
N4*HICKORY*NC*28603
N1*ST*MERCHANTSDISTRIBUTORSINC.*9*0069968880400
N3*5005ALEXLEEBOULEVARD
N4*HICKORY*NC*28601
N1*VN*DPIMIDATLA*92*71541
G68*1*CA*123.22*004132400013*PI*090669
G69*SHP-DOWNEYSHNYBTRASSRT
G70*60*7.5*OZ
G72*88*02***4.8
G76*3866*CA*42093*LB*2019*CF**7742742
SE*19*171889
GE*1*271883
IEA*1*000271883
I am putting all the headers and information still getting the error
Any pointers will be highly appreciated
Regards
Sahil

Hi Sahil,
CR/LF is missing after IEA segment or simply press enter after IEA segment and EDIFECS will validate it fine.
ISA*00* *00* *12*8283234100 *08*9267710000 *081103*1315*U*00401*000271883*0*P*>~
GS*OG*8283234100*3014302200*20081103*1315*271883*T*004010~
ST*875*171889~
G50*N*20081103*236772~
G61*BD*GINASHARPE/KIMSCEARCE*TE*8287254301~
G62*02*20081106~
NTE*ALL*IMPORTANTPOSHIPPINGINFORMATIONatWWW.MERCHANTSDISTRIBUTORS.COMVENDORINFO~
G66*PP*M*2~
N1*BT*MERCHANTSDISTRIBUTORSINC.*9*0069968880200~
N3*P.O.BOX2148~
N4*HICKORY*NC*28603~
N1*ST*MERCHANTSDISTRIBUTORSINC.*9*0069968880400~
N3*5005ALEXLEEBOULEVARD~
N4*HICKORY*NC*28601~
N1*VN*DPIMIDATLA*92*71541~
G68*1*CA*123.22*004132400013*PI*090669~
G69*SHP-DOWNEYSHNYBTRASSRT~
G70*60*7.5*OZ~
G72*88*02***4.8~
G76*3866*CA*42093*LB*2019*CF**7742742~
SE*19*171889~
GE*1*271883~
IEA*1*000271883~

AIP-51505 - "Segment ISA(Interchange Control Header)"

Support,
I seem to be having an issue with one of my trading partner setups.. I am pretty sure it is something silly but can't seem to be able to track it down. I have checked the delimiters in the partner setup as well as run the data thru the data analyzer and it all checked out. I am kinda at a loss on this one.
Thank you for all the help
Jaden
Error
Segment ISA(Interchange Control Header) at guideline position (N/A) is missing. This segment's standard option is Mandatory.{br}{br}This segment was expected after:{br}{tab}Segment Count: 0{br}{tab}Character: 1021
Document wire message
ISA~00~ ~00~ ~ZZ~Allied ~ZZ~UPS ~070801~2117~U~00401~000001054~0~P~+'GS~PO~Allied~UPS~20070801~2117~1054~X~004010'ST~850~1054'BEG~00~SA~57192~87007~20070724'DTM~010~20070724'TD5~~2~000001_DHL_A_2DA'N1~ST~19427~92~7984'N3~500 Oracle Pkwy'N4~Redwood City~CA~96504~US'N1~BT~19427~92~7984'N3~500 Oracle Pkwy'N4~Redwood City~CA~96504~US'PO1~1.1~2~EA~~~VP~50939~BP~6199~DV~255480'PID~F~~~~Standard Item'PO1~2.1~5~EA~~~VP~50939~BP~6197~DV~255481'PID~F~~~~Standard Item'PO1~4.1~5~EA~~~VP~50939~BP~6197~DV~255483'PID~F~~~~Standard Item'PO1~5.1~3~EA~~~VP~149~BP~7191~DV~255484'PID~F~~~~Sentinel Standard Desktop'PO1~6.1~4~EA~~~VP~2814~BP~4191~DV~255485'PID~F~~~~Vision Pad - Gold'PO1~7.1~4~EA~~~VP~50939~BP~6199~DV~255486'PID~F~~~~Standard Item'PO1~8.1~4~EA~~~VP~50936~BP~6198~DV~255487'PID~F~~~~3PL Test Item with Serial Control'PO1~9.1~5~EA~~~VP~149~BP~7191~DV~255488'PID~F~~~~Sentinel Standard Desktop'PO1~10.1~5~EA~~~VP~2814~BP~4191~DV~255489'PID~F~~~~Vision Pad - Gold'SE~29~1054'GE~1~1054'IEA~1~000001054'

For some reason the data compressed a little with the last post. Here is the data and the ISA seems fine to me.
Jadeen
ISA~00~ ~00~ ~ZZ~Allied ~ZZ~UPS ~070801~2117~U~00401~000001054~0~P~+'GS~PO~Allied~UPS~20070801~2117~1054~X~004010'ST~850~1054'BEG~00~SA~57192~87007~20070724'DTM~010~20070724'TD5~~2~000001_DHL_A_2DA'N1~ST~19427~92~7984'N3~500 Oracle Pkwy'N4~Redwood City~CA~96504~US'N1~BT~19427~92~7984'N3~500 Oracle Pkwy'N4~Redwood City~CA~96504~US'PO1~1.1~2~EA~~~VP~50939~BP~6199~DV~255480'PID~F~~~~Standard Item'PO1~2.1~5~EA~~~VP~50939~BP~6197~DV~255481'PID~F~~~~Standard Item'PO1~4.1~5~EA~~~VP~50939~BP~6197~DV~255483'PID~F~~~~Standard Item'PO1~5.1~3~EA~~~VP~149~BP~7191~DV~255484'PID~F~~~~Sentinel Standard Desktop'PO1~6.1~4~EA~~~VP~2814~BP~4191~DV~255485'PID~F~~~~Vision Pad - Gold'PO1~7.1~4~EA~~~VP~50939~BP~6199~DV~255486'PID~F~~~~Standard Item'PO1~8.1~4~EA~~~VP~50936~BP~6198~DV~255487'PID~F~~~~3PL Test Item with Serial Control'PO1~9.1~5~EA~~~VP~149~BP~7191~DV~255488'PID~F~~~~Sentinel Standard Desktop'PO1~10.1~5~EA~~~VP~2814~BP~4191~DV~255489'PID~F~~~~Vision Pad - Gold'SE~29~1054'GE~1~1054'IEA~1~000001054'

How to get duplicate interchange ICN No when error 26: Duplicate interchange detected

Hi
I have been getting error 26: Duplicate interchange detected while i have EDFACT Interchange processing property check
for duplicate UNB5 (Interchange control number)= 30 days.
Now I need to get information for interchange no with whom it has been detected duplicate. Please
assist me to get this information
Kapil Kaushish

Hi Kapil,
Alongwith this error you also get another error, check the event log which has details like interchange Id, Sender Id and receiver Id.
Also on error, Interchange/Transaction sets are suspended based on configuration done on Local Host Settings-->Inbound Batch Processing Option. So you can check the suspended message for the details as well.
Maheshkumar
S Tiwari|User
Page|Blog|BizTalk
Server : Fetching UNB and UNG Segment Values From Interchange Envelope and Mapping

Outbound ECS XSD does not contain UNB Segment.

Hello All,
We are implementing B2B scenario of converting CUSDEC-D96B ECS file to XML file using B2B. The XML file is getting generated successfully in B2B_IN_Queue but it doesnot contain the UNB header segment element in XML.
The structure of the outbound XML is :
<Transaction-CUSDEC xmlns="urn:oracle:integration:b2b:IE012B_CUSDEC" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" XDataVersion="2.0" Standard="EDIFACT" Version="D96B" CreatedDate="2011-11-18T08:12:43" CreatedBy="XEngine_2133" GUID="{C098AF51-AC11-E111-BDBE-00212856E75A}">
<Internal-Properties>.....</Internal-Properties>
<Segment-UNH>....</Segment-UNH>
</Transaction-CUSDEC>
Ideally after the internal properties element, there should be <Segment-UNB> element.
Is there any option we need to enable to populate this element in the XML ?
Pls help.
Regards
Aparna
Edited by: 891977 on Nov 18, 2011 12:09 AM

Ideally after the internal properties element, there should be <Segment-UNB> element.XEngine strips off the interchange (UNB,UNZ) and group (UNG,UNE) information and sends only the Transaction set (UNH to UNT) to back end application however it sends the envelope information (Group and Interchange) to the back end application in Internal-Properties in case of Inbound flow. You may use Internal-Properties to extract out envelope information at middleware (back-end).
Regards,
Anuj

Select one of several FPGA VIs at runtime under RT program control

I need a CRIO RT controller to select one of several FPGA VIs (or bitfiles) at runtime based on an operating mode parameter.
The application requires the FPGA to acquire and process data using several different techniques based on a user supplied mode parameter. Each individual technique will fit into the FPGA, but there is not enough room to fit all of the techniques into the FPGA at the same time. Therefore, I need a way to programmatically select one of the FPGA VIs or bitfiles at runtime. The processed data is transferred to the RT through a common DMA FIFO, and all controls and I/O can be the same for each of the VIs.
I tried using a Case Structure on the RT to select the appropriate Open FPGA VI Reference call based on the current operating mode. When I wired the RefNum output from each case to the common output tunnel, I got an error stating that the RefNums were of different types.
I then tried binding the Open FPGA VI Reference calls to TypeDef or StrictTypeDef controls. In both cases there was an error stating that some of the Open FPGA VI Reference calls were bound to a TypeDef control which had changed.
Is it possible to select an FPGA VI or bitfile at runtime?
If not, is there a way to force the FPGA compiler to layout multiple VIs with the same interface structure so that the RT VI doesn't care which version is running?
If not, any suggestions short of duplicating the entire RT VI for each FPGA instance?
Thanks!

JohnZ wrote:
Is it possible to select an FPGA VI or bitfile at runtime?
Yes, using the FPGA Open VI Reference function as you are already doing, but you need a separate Open FPGA VI reference for each version of the FPGA VI or bitstream.
If not, is there a way to force the FPGA compiler to layout multiple VIs with the same interface structure so that the RT VI doesn't care which version is running?
No, the FPGA VI reference for each FPGA VI will be unique due to information about the interface and VI that is stored as part of the reference. If you are not using DMA in the FPGA VI, then you can use the Upcast function to convert the FPGA Reference into a more generic form which can be used interchangably with other FPGA references that have the same front panel configuration.
If not, any suggestions short of duplicating the entire RT VI for each FPGA instance?
Unfortunately no.
Christian Loew, CLA
Principal Systems Engineer, National Instruments
Please tip your answer providers with kudos.
Any attached Code is provided As Is. It has not been tested or validated as a product, for use in a deployed application or system,
or for use in hazardous environments. You assume all risks for use of the Code and use of the Code is subject
to the Sample Code License Terms which can be found at: http://ni.com/samplecodelicense

EDI: Field REFINT in control record

I am trying to send orders.orders05 idoc from ecc to xi
the message that I get in we02 in ECC is
EDI: Field REFINT in control record with value 'T080902134731A ' is invalid
Does somebody knows where this field is configured ?
when I edited this idoc in we02 and erased this value the process was sucessfuly
but when I try using we19 it assigns this value automatically
thx
Shai

hi
it depends on use
As a reference, this field contains the number of the interchange file, as entered in the EDI standards.
An interchange file can therefore only exist in the external EDI subsystem. Depending on the transmission direction, this number should:
either inform the R/3 System via status confirmation: in this case, the last returned number is saved in the control record of the relevant outbound IDoc (from R/3).
or in inbound processing (from R/3), write to the field in the control record of the inbound IDoc.
cheers

Want to put data in control record of IDOC (Inbound Idoc)

Hi All
For some business reasons so many Idocs are not getting posted into SAP. They are just simply failing.So my client wants report that will give me a list of Idocs that are failed . I want to put document number in the control field so that i can display that filed in the report which sucks data from EDIDC table.
Can i put data in the control record ?
it is an INBOUND idoc
Can i use these fields?
Or will SAP use these fields for any sort of processing?
EDIDC-REFMES(reference message)
EDIDC-REFINT(Reference to interchange file)
EDIDC-REFGRP(message group)

Hi Prashant,
I understand that your requirement is to store name of picked up file in SAP system.
Can you I use ARCKEY, SNDLAD or RCVLAD fields or there is some restriction to use these fields, means will it impact something?
You can use them if you are sure that it would not affect routing routines and message processing in SAP ECC.
Regards,
Radek

Use of interchangeability master data and RBA in GATP

Hi:
Has anyone tried the following using Interchangeability Master data and RBA?
1. Create a supersession chain. A-> B
2. Create a location substitution chain (loc_chain). L1 -> L2
3. Create a location determination procedure called loc_proc. Add to this the location substitution chain (loc_chain) created in the previous step.
4. In the Integrated rule maintenance, create a rule where you assign this location determination procedure loc_proc to the location determination procedure (INC MD).
Expected results:
I am expcting that the system should search for the following location products: 1) A-L1, 2) B-L1, 3) A-L2, 4) B-L2.
Actual Result: The system is only searching for 1) A-L1, 2) B-L1. That is, it is not using the location determination procedure.
Any thoughts on how I can debug this problem? Thanks.
Satish Vadlamani

Dear Satish,
in additon to the location determination procedure you have to create a product substitution procedure and assign your supersession chain to it. Then you have
to go to the rule maintenance, edit your rule and assign the product substitution procedure to your rule. This way both lists (the location list & the product list) will be taken into account when the rule is evaluated.
The way in which the both lists are combined are then set up in the rule control. There you have two options to choose from:
1) Combine locations with all products
If you choose this option, then in your case the result would be:
A-L1, A-L2, B-L1, B-L2
2) Combine products with all locations
In the case, the result would be:
A-L1, B-L1, A-L2, B-L2 (Your preferred result.)
Regards
Christian

Can we interchange the Axis objects in web intelligence.

Hi, All.
I have a report, in that Bar chart has Dimension and Measure objects.. I would like to interchange dimensions. Is it possible in Web Intelligence?
Thanks in Advance...
Arjun.

Hi Arjun,
You can achieve it with Input controls Custom value property .
Let's say you have month , week and sales.
You want to change the month and week in chart.
1.create a variable with default value
Choose Dimension
Month (don't put =Month, it'll give error)
Place this in input control, in Custom values , enter value Week
Create another variable
=If([Choose Dimension]="Month";[Month];If([Choose Dimension]="Week";[Week]))
use this variable in charts.
change your selections with Input control.

Tab control in Adobe forms

Hello,
Is it possible to have a tabstrip control like the one which we have in module pool where we group set of fields under one tab in case of adobe form ?
thanks

Hello Sneha,
I have used buttons as tabstrips , i am not able to paste the source code .However, all you have to do is :
1. Place 2 buttons say btn1 and btn2, one having a dark color and other a lighter color.
2. Place two subforms say sf1 and sf2.sf1 has content of first tab , and sf2 has content of second tab.
3. By default btn1(darker color) & sf1 will be visible.
4. On click of btn2 , interchange the color of buttons & visibilty of subforms.
I hope the above statements suffice.If you want the whole source code just contact at virag.shinde(@)lntinfotech.com
Regards,
Virag

EDIFACT/X12 Interchange counter tracking

Hi Experts,
Need some suggestions on the best way of handling this.
Currently doing an SAP PI 7.1 implementation and one of them requires pickup/droppOFF to VAN.
So as you know each Interchange is numbered in incrementing sequence. e.g 112, 113, 114
So apparently sometimes what happens is you can miss one interchange somewhere in the cloud so I would have received 112, and 114 but never got 113.
Hence we have a requirement to trigger an alert for that if that happens and this check should be done like lets say every 2 hours.
We are using Seeburger (FTP/VAN) and EDI adapter for this implemenation.
Any simple solutions/suggestions?
thanking you
regards

Hi Guys,
Just for the benefit of everyone if they would require this situation somewhere. I know one solution already but was wondering if there was something provided as a standard.
Solution:
What we can do is while doing message mapping we can store the Interchange control number in a table on ABAP stack. And every two hours or so run a simple report program which sorts the list in acsending/decsending order and if one is missing an alert can be raised. As what one has to keep in mind is when these things come from the VAN they don't always reach to you in the same order.
So you have to allow sometime for it.
However it means maintaining an extra table. What i was wondering if this can be defined as a global variable in Seeburger (as daniel said earlier) and then somehow we could access these table from lets say an abap program?
Any pointers will be helpful.
regards

What happened to Database Control?

Why are all OEM topics now forced to reside under the heading "Grid Control"? Grid Control is not the only OEM management option. In fact, it's not even the default: Database Control is installed with any basic 10g installation and serves as the default OEM manager.
Since 10g was released, I often see the terms "OEM" and "Grid Control" used interchangably, and that's not correct on a global level. Both options exist, and anyone running a single database instance is much more likely to use Database Control over Grid control, or if they don't have a terabyte of physical memory on their host.

Hi John!
I use VMware. I've created a RedHat 3.0 virtual machine and started it with 1 GB of RAM. Then I install EMGC and the local agent. I shutdown everything including the VM and edit its setting to come up with 512 MB.
Boot, start the GC and voila! it works. This is of course not a production ready system, but we have a working EMGC for a couple of machines (100+) on a 2 CPU with 4 GB in production.
cu
Andreas

Manual wifi control

Hi. Many times while using first-gen iPhone 2.2 I lose my wifi connection in the middle of what I'm doing, like surfing the Store or managing an online todo list. It's very frustrating to be in the middle of a process that requires wifi connectivity only to have the device lose connectivity because someone else thinks you need to be saving battery. Once wifi is lost, getting the device to retrieve it again requires some weight lifting.
There must be a better way. Can we add a setting to the network connectivity to allow a manual control of the wifi? Give me the user control over how I'd like my device to behave.
That'd be neato.
BWM

leolahoo,
Thanks for reading and replying. I'm not taking offense at your remarks or suggestions, though usually when someone qualifies a sentence with "no offense" it is followed by something offensive.
Trust that we are not operating by rumor. I was referring to my own research when I started rolling out wifi in 2001.
I'm not sure who you are implying is non-technical but I hope you mean our teaching faculty rather than myself..
Thanks for your suggestions. I'll address them with comments so that subsequent responders know what I am and am not looking for in terms of functionality:
1. Creating muliple SSID interchanged based on schedule.
This doesn't meet the requirement of exact location awareness and manual toggling. It would also prove confusing to users if SSIDs are appearing/disappearing.
2. Use Cisco Energywise to turn off specific APs at specific times.
Again, time based and not location based. Also, AP deploymenty is not dense/granular enough that signal from one unit correlates to the target geographic area.
3. Faraday cage.
4. Allow instructors access to WCS.
I'm with you, this will not happen. Hence the thought that we have to do the very hard work (scripting, programming touchscreens with controls) to make it foolproof.
Basically, I can envision how this is possible with good location services and a well defined and tuned radio network, mixed with some scripting and API type integration, but I want to know if anyone has done it or knows without a doubt that it has insumountable roudblocks with Cisco's offerings.
Thanks again!

Controlling interchange id in UNB

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for