Converted from 32 BIT to 64 BIT

I have a difficult problem
Download the new Mountain Lion system, a system that supports fully 64 bit which is very good and the system supports two
But the problem lies in the usb FIFA Online, a company does not support 64
Operate on 32, but when it turned the device to 64 did not work
Tried to delete the program and inauguration did not operate purely Internet I can not find a clear answer
Is there a way I can reach them in order to operate piece or converted from 32 to 64
Here is a picture showing the problem

I have no knowledge of that program and can't comment on its specific features and deficiencies. But since 64-bit is the way of the future and Apple has made it abundantly clear after putting out two successive 64-bit systems, all software companies will have to accommodate if they want to stay competitive. Whether the upgraded versions of the programs remain free to their customers is a whole other matter.
Along the same lines, how much RAM does your Mac have? If it has more than 4GB, that may be the issue until a 64-bit version of your program becomes available. You see, with 32 bits only 4GB can be addressed and some programs get lost when facing more RAM than that.

Similar Messages

  • Bad cleardata performance on 64 bit (converted from 32 bit)

    Hi All,
    I've installed Essbase 64 bit (9.3.1) and copied an application directly from a 32 bit Essbase server (also 9.3.1).
    All other components stayed the same.
    Then i extracted all data and imported it into the new environment.
    Calculating data takes a very long time in the new environment but the second time it goed a lot faster.
    My issue is that when i execute a clear script it runs over 20 minutes. this was 2 minutes in the old environment.
    All the settings are equal, servers are equal (except for the 32 64 bit difference), applications are equal etc.
    Has anyone a suggestion why my clearscript is so slow?
    The number of blocks are almost equal (due to some testing), the block size is equal but the .pag size differs a (16 vs 22 gb) and the .ind size differs a lot (1.5 vs 3.9 gb). the larger ones are the 64 bit environment.
    I hope anyone has a clue where to look, because i'm lost.
    Thanks,
    Marc

    cleardata is basically a read/write operation. I could be wrong but I think that performance is more closely tied to disk speed than bits or cpu. On the 32 bit system, was the data stored locally or on a sans? If it was local, were you using a raid array? How does the 64 bit system storage device differ?
    Dave

  • Really bad banding and artifacts in 16-bit layered greyscale file. Bad banding is retained when converted to 8-bit with No flattening. Flatten 16-bit image and banding and artifacts disappear even with no dither or noise layer. Is this a known bug?

    Has anyone else experienced this?
    I thought it was a monitor problem at first, but I'm using a 10-bit per channel Eizo. It seems to be a Photoshop bug based on many layers interacting with each other. When I flatten everything is fine. But I need to work on this image with layers and decent fidelity. Interestingly when I convert to 8-bit without flattening (and utilising the dither function to potentially reduce banding even further), it uses the terrible artifact laden/banding to do the conversion even though when I zoom into 1:1 in my 16-bit document it looks fine. But 50% or 25% zoom I suddenly get these awful artifacts.
    Here's some screenshots to clarify. Please note I've used Photoshop for 24 years so I'm no slouch but this is the first time I've seen this. The problem is I need to do some subtle airbrush and texture work on this and it's almost unusable unless I flatten (please note, it does the same in the original 8-bit file and just to say I Gaussian-Blurred every layer with a 30px radius after converting to 16-bit so the there's no longer any 8-bit information in there or reasons for banding/artifacts). I can only think it is some of bug in Photoshop's layering engine.
    Has anyone seen this before - dealt with this before?
    Thanks in advance.
    Not sure these embedded images will work.
    8% zoomed - see all the strange banding and triangular artifacts
    <a href="http://imgur.com/izrGuia"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/izrGuia.png" title="source: imgur.com" /></a>
    Flattened view - all smooth:
    <a href="http://imgur.com/Pn35IAK"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/Pn35IAK.png" title="source: imgur.com" /></a>
    50% zoom, still there:
    <a href="http://imgur.com/Z207hFd"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/Z207hFd.png" title="source: imgur.com" /></a>
    100% artifacts disappear:
    <a href="http://imgur.com/6aGOz0V"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/6aGOz0V.png" title="source: imgur.com" /></a>
    100% 16-bit layered
    <a href="http://imgur.com/0XJfe5e"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/0XJfe5e.png" title="source: imgur.com" /></a>
    and finally 8-bit layered converted from 16-bit with dither.
    <a href="http://imgur.com/PSxiu43"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/PSxiu43.png" title="source: imgur.com" /></a>
    help!

    I can't speak to why, perhaps someone more knowledgeable than I can speak to that.   But if it only happens at certain views then it's purely a display issue; it won't happen in print or when you downsample to display size.  Such banding issues have always disappeared for me when I output to 8 bit.
    I'd assume that it's because of your monitor; it can't display all the colors and when zoomed out there's too wide of a range in a small area so banding occurs.  But that's just my guess.

  • T61p with Windows XP - how to change this from 32 bit to 64 bit?

    I am in urgent need to have my T61p converted from 32 bit to 64 bit. I am currently using windows xp professional 2002 sp2. Would someone let me know how to do this? Thanks a million. Carlee

    Hi there,
    Well, if you have Windows XP 64, then it's a matter of making a choice of running both side-by-side or dumping one for the other. If you don't have 64-bit, then you'll need to procure yourself the 64-bit version of the OS. It's not a matter of simply "activating" something, or installing a patch of some sort.
    The 64-bit version uses a different set of core files that are incompatible with the 32-bit XP altogether, it's not a simple upgrade as all the drivers will require re-installation as well (applies not only to the OS, but to all peripherals that you have as well).
    Hope this helps

  • PS CC HDR toning in ACR then Converting to 16 bit major error!

    So here's the deal - I'm an avid user of HDR and have always made my HDRs in photoshop (but tonemapped elsewhere).  Now, with the new tonemapping in ACR I can get great results - BUT - there's a BIG problem.
    After I've created my HDR and toned it in ACR it opens in photoshop as a 32 bit file (with the camera raw adjustments showing as a filter).
    And it looks great.
    BUT, when I try to make that a usable file by converting down to 16 or 8 bit - all that work goes to waste.
    I've always used "exposure and gamma" to convert from 32 to 16 or 16 to 8 - that's the one we all know and love because it doesn't change anything as far as the image appearance.
    However - with HDRs I create and tone in ACR:  Once I do this to convert to 16 bits using exposure and gamma (like always and touching nothing) - the image turns almost white - horribly washed out and lousy looking.  I've tried it every way I can think of.  I'll flatten the 32 bit file as to get rid of the acr smart filter, I've rasterized the layer, I've duplicated the document, I've tried merging and not merging - everything.  The preview that shows when I am about to convert 32 to 16 in exposure/gamma looks correct, but as soon as I do it - boom - washed out weird looking image.
    Other issue:
    If I save a 32 bit psd after toning in ACR to work on later - it looks way different the next time I open it.  This happens whether I save the profile along with the file or not.  It opens darker, for the most part and I can never get back to how it was (and was unable to save as 32, 16, or 8 looking right!).
    Last issue:  If I create a 32 bit hdr image but choose NOT to tone in acr and save it as a radiance file - if I open that radiance file later in photoshop and use the acr filter to tone it - again, it appears way different like a lot of data has been lost.  The image is usually a lot brighter, washed out, less colorful, and the pixels seem to not be able to bend very far in any direction.
    Can someone please explain if I am doing something wrong??  Or if this is a bug??  I love the way the 32 bit images look once I've toned them - but that's the only time they'll look remotely like that!  Can't save, convert to 16 bit, or do doodly squat without the image drastically changing!

    Ok!  Thank you everyone for taking the time to help me figure this out!  I appreciate it!
    I have taken everyone's advice into consideration and tried everything suggested - watched every video - read every link - and here's where I'm at now.
    There's some good news and bad news and just plain weird news.
    I do have those profile settings enabled (always have) - and it does ask me if I want to embed, convert, or discard.
    If I flatten a 32 bit toned image (to get rid of the acr filter) and save it as a 32 bit tiff - I can re-open that tiff with convert to working space on - and it looks the same.  I can ALSO convert that tiff to 16 bit and have it look a LOT closer to the original (nothing like the washed out ones).  That's good news!
    However, if I save the 32 bit toned image with the acr filter still there as PSD - it will open washed out and crazy the next time I open it (using convert to working space - I've also tried every other option).  So - working on a 32bit toned in acr image again is still impossible after closing it without it looking all washed out.
    ALSO - there is one section in color profile settings that is puzzling me and affects all of this in a major way.
    Above the three boxes to check about profile mismatches and warnings - there are 3 settings
    RGB, CMYK, and Gray.
    Now by default my RGB settings was RGB: Off
    I know this is a weird issue because my working space is adobe rgb and the profile mismatch warnings are still on - so the same result happens when opening files.  And also by checking the include the working color profile with an image when you save it should achieve the same result as haveing RGB: Preserve Embedded Profiles on.  But there's a weirder area this causes a difference.
    If I have that RGB setting OFF - and merge those 3 same images to hdr and then go to tone in ACR it looks really dark (not a problem it's a 32 bit hdr file - I use acr to make it look the way I want).  It's rich in color and seems to have loads of data and tone available to play with.
    HOWEVER - if I start with that RGB setting to "Preserve embedded profiles" - then merge those same 3 images to hdr and then go to tone in ACR it looks entirely different.  It looks way less dark and contrasty, is very drained in color, and seems to have a lot less data to play with in terms of bringing out shadows or toning down highlights.
    It's best for me to just show you a side by side - as I'm including here.  This is the same hdr created with no changes other than that one setting (shown in the image) being different before I merge to hdr.  (And the 32bit image that opens in ACR I have made zero changes to at the point of screen capture).
    Any ideas?

  • Why only 10-bit depth dng files from 16-bit Nikon D90 nef files?

    When I convert 16-bit .nef files from my Nikon D90 to DNG I get only 10-bits depth.
    Since the camera should be producing 12-bit depth it seems I am losing information in the conversion, and I don't want that.
    I have installed the 7.1 DNG converter, and I suppose that is what is used when I download from camera memory card through Bridge 5.1 and click dng conversion.
    Same thing if I open the .nef in Photoshop 5.1 , which kicks up CameraRaw converter 6.7.0.339.
    Why is this?
    Can't .dng have more than 10-bit depth?
    Sverk

    Well, according to the user manual and to the review in
    http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/D90/D90A.HTM
    the D90 delivers 12-bit color depth in the .NEF files.
    Of course, I haven't looked at the actual pixel data to find out how finely graded they are.
    What I'm looking at is what Bridge 5.1 (WindowsXP) says about the files in the
    Metadata/ Bit depth entry. 
    In that, the .NEF files are listed as "16-bit" depth (although it will actually hold only 12-bit resolution), but when converted to .DNG it says only  "10-bit",
    and that holds both when the conversion is done automatically during the importing from the camera, and when converting from .nef files afterwards.
    Archiving pictures in the .dng format seems to be a good idea -- but only if no information is lost in the conversion.
    Thus, the "10-bit" info showing in Bridge worries me.
    Might it be that the meaning of bit depth is different in the two file formats?
    Might there be something about the de-mosaicing that necessarily consumes two bits of depth?   Whether in the .dng conversion -- or when saved .nef files are later to be used?
    In other words, for practical purposes, are the formats equivalent in color resolution,
    Or is there indeed a certain loss?
    Maybe a very difficult question, but I'd sure want to have a technical ly definite answer before I dare switch to using the .DNG format all the way.
    Sverk

  • How to convert a 16-bit image to 8-bit

    I am having difficulties in skeletonizing my image. Although I already threshold my image, it still cannot be skeletonized. When I create the image using IMAQ create, the image type must be set to 16-bit, otherwise it will create an error message. An enthusiast in the forum told me that the image must be 8-bit so that it can be skeletonized. But I do not know how to convert the image from 16-bit to 8-bit. So is there anybody out there that can provide me with a solution. Attached is the VI that I used. Really appreciate your help.
    Attachments:
    Image_Acquisition.vi ‏68 KB

    Try using the IMAQ Cast Image function under Motion & Vision>>Vision Utilities>>Image Management>>IMAQ Cast Image.
    Regards,
    Steve

  • How do you convert a higher bit rate music to 128 kbps AAC?

    How do convert a higher bit rate music to 128 kbps AAC?

    Select "Convert higher bitrate songs to 128 kbps AAC" - http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=303772 - discussion from 2007

  • Migration from 32-bit to 64-bit

    Hello,
    I am planning to run 32 bit Oracle software on 64 bit linux(4.8) operating system?how can i do this please guide me in this regards iam very grateful to you.
    Thanks,
    Rehan

    user8308403 wrote:
    Thanks Fiedi Z for prompt response.but please tell me one thing through this steps i can move 32-bit oracle software to 64-bit linux server?after performing this step 32-bit oracle software converts to 64-bit or oracle remains still remain same for e.g 32-bit oracle software?
    Second thing if i want to keep same oracle version 32-bit on 64-bit linux server..is it possible,if yes then how culd i achieve this.
    Thanks,
    Rehan
    This is from certification note
    •Running 32-bit Linux x86 Oracle Database server on Linux x86-64 AMD64/EM64T (64-bit OS) is not supported .
    Cheers

  • In-place upgrade of CF10 from 32-bit to 64-bit?

    We initially installed CF10 32-bit because we had some legacy COM objects that needed to run.  We've finally gotten rid of those objects and I would like to convert to 64-bit.  Is there an easy way to convert/upgrade that would preserve all/most/some of my configuration?  Or do I have to do a complete uninstall/reinstall?
    Windows Server 2008 R2
    IIS 7.5
    CF10 Standard
    thanks!

    I recommend doing a clean uninstall/install.  You can make a copy of the neo-*.xml files found in \ColdFusion10\cfusion\lib somewhere first.  These .xml files contain most of the configuration settings you set in CF Administrator.  After installing the 64-bit version, make a backup of the clean .xml files somewhere safe, then copy over the ones you grabbed from your 32-bit installation.  That way, if ColdFusion restarts without issue, you are good to go.  If not, you have backups of clean .xml files to restore from.
    -Carl V.

  • Is it possible to copy entire database when update from 32 bit to 64 bit?

    Just want to update the os from 32bit to 64bit with Oracle9i. Sinece the data amount is very large, to export and import is quite time consuming, so Is it possible to copy entire database? Or any other suggestion?

    what's the OS ?
    You can check metalink doc, for example this one
    Subject: How to convert a 32-bit database to 64-bit database on Linux?
    Doc ID: NOTE:341880.1
    or
    Changing between 32-bit and 64-bit Word Sizes
    Doc ID: NOTE:62290.1

  • 24-bit audio files converted to 16-bit in Logic Pro 7

    Hello,
    I'm working on producing my band's demo and this is my first project in Logic Pro 7. The tracks were originally recorded into a Fostex D2424LV hard disc recorder as 24-bit wave files, then imported into Logic. At this point, I've done the editing and effects processing in Logic and exported the tracks as individual wave files, with the intent to put the tracks back on the Fostex and run them through a Yamaha 24-channel analog board for the final mixdown.
    Everything has gone smooth until now. When I play the exported tracks back on the Fostex, most of them are peaking on the meters, while the same tracks played back in Logic don't even come close to peaking. I've tried re-exporting the tracks with reduced fader levels and still get peaks on the Fostex.
    Given that the reduced levels still cause tracks to peak on the Fostex, I'm suspecting a bit-depth issue. I didn't realize at the time that the files were converted to 16-bit when they were imported into Logic. The Fostex only works with 24-bit files and I'm wondering if exporting the 16-bit tracks in Logic as 24-bit wave files might be causing the problem.
    If this turns out to be the cause of the peaking tracks, is it possible to re-import or replace the converted 16-bit files with the original 24-bit files and apply the editing and efx processing that I've done to the 24-bit files?
    I'll greatly appreciate any help you folks can give me on this one.
    Kevin
    Dual 2.0 Ghz G5 Powermac   Mac OS X (10.4.1)   RME Multiface
    Dual 2.0 Ghz G5 Powermac   Mac OS X (10.4.1)   RME Multiface

    i am very surprised that the fostex doesn't work with 24-bit files.
    your peaking is not likely to be due to bit depth, although i can see why you might think so. maybe you're right.
    logic has inbuilt -6db of head room you should know.
    your suggestion of reimporting the original tracks from the fostex is exactly the thing you should do. remove the 16-bit files from the system and re-import the fostex files. open the logic project and it will look for the old files. for greatest ease make sure your fostex imported files have the same names as the ones you are removing. when it finds the files with the same name it should come up with an error message. select use anyway.
    what's happening is logic stores information about the file, its length, bit-depth and so forth. so just get logic to use anyway and the files "should" playback alright.

  • Do I need to convert my 12-bit camera to 8bits to "grab and save an .avi file? If so, HOW?

    i am using a 12-bit camera with imaq-vision software, the latest version, along with labveiw 7.0. I narrowed the error down to the ACI write frame icon. It is giving me an error that the image type is not correct. leaving the error image is not compatible error #1074396077. Any help would be greatly appreciated

    Some cameras offer the option of 8 bit output, or you might be able to do it in MAX. If not, you will need to convert each image from 16 bit to 8 bit using a 4 bit shift and IMAQ Cast Image. Wire the 16 bit image as the source and an 8 bit image as the destination. Wire the output image to the AVI Write vi.
    Bruce
    Bruce Ammons
    Ammons Engineering

  • AA 1.5 convert to 16 bit upon closing?

    In my AA 1.5, audio files open in 32 bit, which is what I want for processing. Is there a waay to cause them to convert to 16 bit upon closing?
    Thanks

    No automated method, no. And neither should you do this if there's any chance at all that you will need to process them further, because you'd lose any benefit from the previous edits. For instance, if you'd put a nice clean reverb on the end of a file, and then saved it as 16 bit, you'd  throw out a lot of the detail in the reverb tail. Perhaps more significantly, if you left a file at a relatively low level and saved it as a 16-bit int, you'd lose loads of resolution and never be able to get it back again.
    Once you've opened an original file as 32-bit and processed it, it should stay this way until it reaches your distribution format, ideally.

  • How do I convert an 8 bit serial data string I have received (say 01110101) into decimal format??

    I am having a hard time finding a function that will help me convert an 8 bit serial data string I have received (say 01110101) into decimal format.

    When you have your front panel displayed, you should a whole palette of controls that you can place on the front panel. If the palette is not displayed, thne just right click on your mouse and it should appear. The upper left most set of controls on the palette is Numeric. Go there and select Numeric Indicator to display a numeric output. On the diagram, you can also right click the output 1 and select Create>Indicator. The format string is %b (as in boy) for a binary string. As I said, this should be the value for the format string input. You can right click on the Scan From String and select Edit Scan String. This will bring up a dialog box in which you pick what you want to do (Scan Number) and how you want to do it (Scan Binary Integer
    It sounds like you really need to take a course in LabVIEW programming. There are are links here to NI classes and some on-line tutorials.

Maybe you are looking for