Copa - Value feild amount Adjustment

Hello All,
we have created some value feilds based on some Cost Elements groups in CO-PA now we have to change the Cost elements in that group and need to check the past data with the changed values of current cost elements.
Is there any T.Code by which i can do that in SAP.
here is an example :
My Cost Element Group: XYZ with Cost Elements X,Y, Z is assigned to Value feild XYZ with cost comming from each cost element X=100, Y = 100 and Z = 100. and total cost reflecting in my Co-pa report is 300 for XYZ
Now due to some business requirments we have changed Cost Element Group XYZ with cost element of X,Y and A and the value of A = 200 in the last month.
Now i want to run the last month report and see the total cost in XYZ = 400,
can any one tell me how to back adjust the values in CO-PA with the new Changes is it possible?
Best Regards,
Ravi

Hi Ravi
It mainly depends on how many months of past data you would be correcting.. It will be definetely not practically possible to reverse the settlements as well as reversing the FI docs.....
If it is cming from assessment cycles - then reversal and reexecuting them is not an issue
My personal suggestion would be to go with KE21N.... Calculate the net adjustment to be made in an excel and then pass a correction entry from KE21N to increase / decrease the value
br, Ajay M

Similar Messages

COPA values mismatch between KE24 and KE30

Hello,
Background: After recent implementation because of wrong configuration, June and July has wrong COPA values (documents). I have been assigned to reverse these documents and We have been given the documents(with excel file all the values in it) we need to reverse and adjust with new values. I was able to reverse successfully using SCAT(for KE21N). We got exact result what we expected with KE24 report but KE30 is not reflecting same result. However in KE24 report is matching penny by penny after reversal. We just wanted to know the steps we are following is correct or Is there any other efficient method to resolve this issue. Why KE30 report is not in sync with KE24? Is KE30 is reading from different tables. Please advise ASAP.
Thanks,
Pravin & Vishwa

Hi shivaji,
What is the reason for the difference in the amount. you may have to manually clear the documents using transaction F-03 or F-32 and post the difference manually.
Regards
Mahendra
Assign points if this helps

Delete COPA value fields in a productive system

Does anyone have practical experience with deleting COPA value fields in a productive system?
The issue is that old, no longer used value fields should be deleted from a productive system to allow creating new ones, as the maximun number of value fields is reached.
An alternative would be to delete the prior transaction data captured on these no longer to be used value fields and rename them for their new use (to avoid that different kind of old and new data is reported on the same value field).
I am refering to the documentation on transaction KEA0 (or OSS note 160892 up to release 4.5), where it is mentioned that deleting value fields should only be done for operating concerns that have not yet been used productively. Did anyone do this already in a productive system?
Cheers, Peter

To delete characteristics or value fields, you should perform the following
activities:
1. Delete the corresponding characteristics and value fields from
Customizing in all clients (this includes forms, reports, planning
layouts, and so forth). To locate characteristics and value fields, use
the appropriate where-used list in the Customizing Monitor. You can
access it by choosing Tools -> Analysis -> Check Customizing Settings
(TA KECM).
You can jump directly from the where-used list to the relevant
Customizing transaction and then delete the appropriate field there.
2. Switch to the screen for maintaining the data structure of an
operating concern (Maintain operating concern).
3. If you need to effect other changes to the datastucture for the
operating concern before making any deletions, effect those changes and
save the data structure.
4. In order to be able to select the fields of the data structure,
choose Extras -> Characteristics (or Value fields) -> Unlock.
5. Select the characteristics and value fields to be deleted and remove
them from the data structure with the "Reset fields" function.
6. Reactivate the operating concern. The system starts by checking
whether the operating concern contains any data and whether the fields
to be deleted are still being used in any Customizing settings.
7. If none of the fields are still in use, the system then starts the
re-activation. If the operating concern does not contain any data or
does not require the database system to be converted, the tables are
activated. You are then able to activate the environment for the
operating concern. In this case, the following activities no longer
apply.
If the operating concern already contains data, a system message tells
you that the database needs to be converted. If you proceed, an
activation log appears (at the top of the list).
8. Analyze the activation log. If it only contains error messages
telling you to convert the tables, proceed with the next activity.
You must otherwise remove the cause of the errors before the tables can
be converted. In this case, you should answer "No" to the next prompt,
which asks whether the conversion transaction should start.
9. If you still only receive error messages telling you to convert the
tables, choose "Back" and start the conversion.
10. Plan a job for the conversion. A list of the tables to be converted
is shown for this. If the tables only contain a small amount of data
(less than 10 000 records), then all the tables can be converted in one
job. In that case, you can select all the tables.
For larger tables, conversion should take place in several jobs.
However, you should ensure that table CE4xxxx (where xxxx = operating
concern) is the last table to be converted.
Warning. No other changes can be made to the operating concern during
the conversion.
A copy of the table is generated during the conversion. The database
system should have sufficient memory available for this copy.
To schedule conversion as a job, use the "Schedule selections" function.
You can display the current status of the conversion by selecting the
"Refresh" icon. Tables disappear from the list once they have been
converted sucessfully. If a conversion is taking a while, it is also
possible to leave the transaction. You can then continue the conversion
using DB requests -> Mass processing in one of the following ways:
With the job overview. You access this by choosing System -> Services ->
Jobs.
Using the database utility transaction. You access this by choosing
Utilities -> Database Utility in the ABAP Dictionary menu.
You can use the status function to call up the status of the operating
concern during operating concern maintenance. You need to activate all
tables after conversion.
11. To analyze errors that have occurred during the conversion, you can
use the database utility transaction by choosing Extras -> Logs. The log
has the same name as the conversion job: TBATG-date. You can also
restart the conversion with this transaction.
For more information on the database utility, choose Help -> Application
help while still in the above transaction.
12. Once you have activated all the tables in the operating concern,
generate the operating concern environment from within operating concern
maintenance.
You can then use the operating concern again.
Please, refer to the IMG documentation under Controlling ->
Profitability Analysis -> Structures -> Define operating concern
-> Maintain operating concern, for further details.
Hope it helps

Issue with MB51 - Value in Amount in LC column- Reg

Dear ALL,
I have an issue from Materia Ledger - while executing the report MB51 to view the material document with relevant to MIGO process (GRN with movement type 101), it has been noticed that some items it is picking up the value in amount in LC column and for some items it is NOT picking up the value, for this client Material Ledger is activated, please share your views on the subject..
Thanks & Regards
Rambabu

HI
check there if any FI document created or not for your material document for which you are not getting value
I think there will not there will not any FI document and check you have storage location tab on where tab in MIGO
if no storage location tab then its consumption
Regards
Kailas Ugale

When reporting "Spend" do you use PO Value, Invoice Amount or Goods Receipt

When reporting "Spend" do you use PO Value, Invoice Amount or Goods Receipt? I am trying to standardize reporting and would like feedback on what is the norm. The users cannot agree so I need to know what the standard is.

PO Value is what is budgeted for ,
Invoice is what is actually being paid for.
GR would give you the value of goods received. My take on this is that it should be Invoice value since this is what is reflected in the books and is actually being paid for...

COPA value field not getting complete SD condition value

Hi Gurus,
I find a strange issue when a billing document is transferred to COPA (well basically, after a billing document is released to accounting, all the controlling docs and COPA docs are generated). The issue is, I have a SD pricing condition which has been assigned to COPA value field. I also have the transfer +/- sign checked on this value field. Now consider the following 2 scenarios:
Scenario 1: In VKOA, two different G/l accounts have been assigned to the corresponding pricing condition account key. These 2 G/L accounts have been defined as cost elements with category '12' (its related to sales deduct). and fall under the same cost element group. When a billing doc is posted to accounting and hence to COPA, I see that there is no value in the value field and the corresponding condition type. Then I ran a simulation using KE4ST and found that I have two lines with the same pricing condition type and value field but one carries a positive value and the other one carries a negative value. Then I came to a conclusion that may be these two lines are netting out and hence there is no value being posted on the value field.
Scenario 2: In VKOA, I have assigned two different G/L accounts which fall under different cost element group and one is defined as category 12 and the other as category 1. This time I see that only 1 line of value field is brought into COPA corresponding to the pricing condition and hence I see a value in COPA value field. But business doesn't want to go with scenario 2 as they don't want to use two cost elements in different cost element group. Also one is sales deduct and the other is primary cost/ cost reducing revenue. So there is a balance getting accumulated in the primary cost/cost reducing revenue element.
How do I resolve this issue to post a value to the COPA value field using scenario 1? I have also tried to uncheck the transfer +/- sign but I am unable to even release a billing doc to accounting as it is giving me a error message,: "correct the value field assignment for the condition type".
Please help me !!
Regards,
Sony

Version of SAP?

MCE3 : PO value/GR value/Invoice amount/invoice amount

Once we excute the MCE3 transaction by giving selection parameters as Period from and to and Purchasing Org.
When i see the report
Vendor PO Value GR Value Invoice amount invoice amount
X 25761 20805 19781 27249
Please explain the i above case two invoice amounts are different,Why it so
And explain the functionality

Hi
If you press F1
1) Invoice Amount
<GLamount>Amount, which is set by the vendors in the invoice.
Use
In the standard system, the Purchasing Information System updates this key figure in local currency upon invoice receipt on the purchase order date of the schedule line ( information structure S011, S012).
2) Invoice amount as at posting date
Both are different Please check the above
Hope it helps
Thanks /karthik

COPA - Value Field - Assignment to a G/L account

Dear All,
Could anyone kindly let us know what the relationship between the COPA value fields and G/L.???
(We do not use Sales and Distrubution module in our company)
Thank you Very much
Gayani
Moderator: Please, search SDN

Hi,
The configuration part looks to be ok !! But just check the G/L account you have mentioned, the second one which does get booked, see if it configured in a way to accept the value returned by the condition.
Check in the order item conditions, the value returned by the z condition not getting booked.
Hope it helps.
Thanks & Regards
Sadhu Kishore

SD- conditions to be mapped to COPA value field data in BI

Hi Experts,
I have a req where in I have to map condition level Sales order data to some COPA value fields. Currently for one Sale order item there are multiple conditions that means multiple line items. But when I try to find the COPA value field for the same same (Sales order, Sales order item ) key I get only one line item.
This has to be done for BI integration, but needs to be done at the source system level.
So my questions are,
1) How can we get the condition level data from COPA? Is it possible to fetch the data at that granularity?
2) Is it possible to integrate SD & COPA data on condition level i.e. at Sales order, sales order item & condition level.

Hi,
In KEA0, Data structure tab click on pencil button (change view).
Then click on -> change
Now you will be able to select new value fields
Rememeber, after changing click on save, activate and then back button. system will ask for regeneration, click ok.
Regards
Raghu

How do I change the property value priceInfo.amount?

How do I change the property value priceInfo.amount?
After changing the quantity field in the shopping cart and submit the form, I need to convert the field value priceInfo.amount and then set it again.
How do I?
Thank´s.

Why do you need to convert this value and set it again?

Zero value in Amount field during transaction upload into BPC

Hi Experts,
When I run DM package to load transaction data from BW to BPC,I am getting warning error with rejected list which contains amount field as zero value.
Is it possible to load records with amount value as Zero.My current EPM version is 10 SP14 Patch 1.
Currently my cube is in load mode .I have understood that during transaction data upload the cube should be in load mode and during inputting data using input forms it should be in planning mode.Please correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks,
Raju

Thanks for your quick turn around.
I have multiple keyfigures which have zero values in some records hence I am getting zero values in Amount field.
Shall I mark Real-Time data Target can be planned; data loading not allowed always.
Regards,
Venkat

Fixed & Variable Cost flow to COPA Value fields

Hi All,
I am using the Fixed & Variable Cost option that has to flow to COPA (under which mechanism it will flow to COPA Value fields).
as structure based sample from OKTZ to KE4R
OKTZ
KE4R
01
10
Raw Material
3
Sum of Fixed & Var
ROHST
Raw Material Cost
01
20
Power
1
Fixed Amt
VVPOW
Power
01
30
Labour
1
Fixed Amt
VVLAB
Labour
02
10
Raw Material
3
Sum of Fixed & Var
ROHST
Raw Material Cost
02
20
Power
2
Var Amt
VVPOW
Power
02
30
Labour
2
Var Amt
VVLAB
Labour
While I run Std cost estimate it will show me "Power & Labour" -as per KP26 Fixed & Variable
Power
Fixed Cost
15
Variable Cost
8
Labour
Fixed Cost
10
Variable Cost
5
How it ditribute to COPA Value Fields the below amounts

Any replies ...........pls

Excise assable value feild in j_1i tables

Hi Gurus,
I would like to know how can we fetch the feild for Exise assable value feild in excise table....
Ravi

Dear ravi
If you want to the assessable value to flow in invoice print out, then you can try with the following option.
I am sure, you would be maintaining a condition type for this and assigned in your pricing procedure. So go to V/08 and against the assessable value condition type, select the "Print" column.
Alternatively, in J1ID, in "Material Assessable Value", for a given material, you have to maintain the assessable value and you can fetch the same in invoice print outs.
Thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

How to create substituion for COPA value fields?

Hi,
In OBBH i cannot find a destination field for copa value fields. The destination fields are always from SAP standard tables like BKPF and so on.
In this case how can i create a substitution to assign values to COPA value fields?

Hi,
I can see only the following entries in my OBBH user exit, so what is difference between COPA0002 and these :-
SCO10
SGJF1
SGJA1
SGJA2
SGJA3

If the system prameter has value bigger than 1 trap the current copie value

Hi.I have a report in which there is a requirement to be printed in two copies.So I put in the initial value of system parameter copies value 2.But I must print in the margin at the bottom of the page a label with TITLE-1 if we are in the first copie!!!, and a label with TITLE-2 if we are in the second copie.The report builder now always has the value copies=2.Is there some way to control the current copie value which means something like current page number in analogy current copie?
Thanks in advance thrylos97.

Hello,
The parameter COPIES is treated by the "Printer Driver" and not by the "Data Model" / "Data Layout"
If you want to be able to print Copy #1 / Copy #2 on the output, you have to create a repeating frame enclosing everything,
base this repeating frame on a sql query :
select "Copy 1" from dual union all select 'Copy 2' from dual
and put the Copy # on the Layout
Regards
Edited by: dsegard on Mar 30, 2009 11:26 AM

Copa - Value feild amount Adjustment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for