Correlation in Biztalk.

Hello All,
I reffered below link for learning basic correlation, I followed each step as stated there
but I don't understand which messages to drop in which folder that wasn't much clear for me.
can anybody help to make those things understand.
Thanks.
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/13729.walkthrough-correlations-in-biztalk-orchestration.aspx

Hi,
You have to do the following steps:
Create a Order document and set a custom value in the OrderID node. For example:
1234567890
<Order>
<OrderID>1234567890</OrderID>
<OrderType>MyType</OrderType>
<OrderQty>100</OrderQty>
</Order>
Drop this file in the Receive location related with the port PortRcvOrder. For example:
C:\SourceOrder\*.xml
Wait until a new file is geneated in the folder set in the port
PortSndOrder. for example C:\GeneratedOrder\
Create a new Invoice document and set the same value that you have set in the OrderID node of the Order document in the
InvoiceID property. For example: 1234567890.
<Invoice>
<InvoiceID>1234567890></InvoiceID>
<Price>250</Price>
</Invoice>
Drop the invoice document in the receive location of the port PortRcvInvoice. For example C:\SourceInvoice\*.XML.
Wait until a file is generated in the folder set for the send port PortSndInvoice.
Regards.

Similar Messages

Correlations Error in Biztalk

Hi all,
I am trying to run sample of Correlations and follwing one article :
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/13729.walkthrough-correlations-in-biztalk-orchestration.aspx
I have created application and ports as per forumn
when i am trying to test correlation it's giving me error as:
I have two Receive Port and Receive Location :
1) This service instance exists to help debug routing failures for instance "{8E4CFE61-925E-4DB4-88CA-AEB6DB5754D1}". The context of the message associated with this instance contains all the promoted properties at the time of the routing
failure.
Routing Failure Report for "Routing Failure Report for "ReceiveInvoicePort""
2) Routing Failure Report for "Routing Failure Report for "ReceiveOrderPort""
This service instance exists to help debug routing failures for instance "{52F9E444-DC1D-462A-ACA6-AB9BC7021819}". The context of the message associated with this instance contains all the promoted properties at the time of the routing failure.
Thanks and Regards, Nitin.

Hi,
Please, paste the Order and Invoice documents you are using for the test.
In addition, check the following:
Verify that you have promoted correctly both OrderId and
InvoiceID properties in the related schemas using the same context property
CommonID.
You should also check is de definition of the Correlation Type, to be sure that you are using the
CommonID property.
And the last thing is to verify that you are starting-following correctly the Correlation in the Send and Receive ports.
Regards.

Biztalk correlation problem

Hello All,
I m not familiar with correlations in Biztalk, but i have a problem:
I want to initialize a correlation property on a send shape to do a folow on it on an other receive shape (false).
i created a schema for this property, i did a promotion on it and i set the "Property schema Bas"e on "PartContextPropertyBase" then i could build and deploy my solution but when i tried to do
some tests on it i get this error:
Shape name: Send xxxx
ShapeId: de061864-3255-486a-b16c-6cf084457bb7
Exception thrown from: segment 2, progress 7
Inner exception: Failed to initialize the correlation property name: xxx namespace: https://xxxxxxxxxxxxx.PropertySchema from message:
msgxxxxx.
Exception type: CorrelationViolationException
Source: Microsoft.XLANGs.Engine
Target Site: Void InitializeFromMsg(Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.XLANGMessage, Microsoft.XLANGs.Core.XlangStore)
The following is a stack trace that identifies
An other question why i m getting this error with name space https://xxxxxxxxxxxxx.PropertySchema
while the name space of my promoted property is https://xxxxxxxxxxxxx.msgxxxxx
PS: when i try to set the property schema base on "MessageContextPropertyBase" i get error on while building the solution : property does not exist.....
Thanks in advance

Hello,
This can also happen if the property schema base for a property schema record is set to anything other than MessageDataPropertyBase.
Could you output its value with Trace.WriteLine or EventLog.write Entry to see weather you are getting any output or not
Thanks
Abhishek

Scheduled pickup and email of File from folder location

Hi,
I have a scenario where we need to pick up a file from a folder location on a particular date of a month and send it via email to an email id.
For this, we have planned a design where I have a SQL receive adapter which will poll a table in SQL and return a boolean value indicating that the file is
to be sent on the particular date. This instantiates an orchestration if the boolean returned is true.
once the orchestration instance is created, in the next steps, I am trying to receive the file from a folder location. I am getting a build error here. Mentioning "you must specify at least one already-initialized correlation set for a non-activation receive
that is on a non-selfcorrelating port".
Can you please suggest how I can correlate on these locations.
Regards,
Ujjwal
-Ujjwal

Ok got,
If my understanding is correct, you have an orchestration with two receive shapes. First receive shape is for
SQL to receive the trigger message and in second Receive shape you expect to receive the message from Folder (file location)
since you have two receive location in your Orchestration you have a convoy and you have set correlation for your Receive shapes. Initialize the correlation set
in first Receive shape and follow the correlation set in another Receive shape.
But for your requirement, even when the flow of your Orchestration moves to the second Receive shape (which is configured to
file location) it not going to pull/receive the file into your Orchestration as you expect.
As said, read the
schedule task adapter and use to trigger the file receive process on particular date of a month and have send
port with filter for the Receive port name (which has Receive location with schedule task adapter) and configure this send port to send email.
Read more about correlation here:
Using Correlations in Orchestrations
Walkthrough: Correlations in BizTalk Orchestration
Read more about convoy here.
Working with Convoy Scenarios
Sequential Convoys
Read more about
Schedule Task Adapter:
https://biztalkscheduledtask.codeplex.com/
https://connectedenterprise.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/the-very-useful-biztalk-scheduled-task-adapter/
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Master page using two different number counts

I'm working on a book for teachers and have the students book side by side with the teacher advice page. I want the page numbers of the students book to match the students workbook. Is there a way to set this up?

Hi Harkirat,
Yes it is possible to achieve what you want and that is where correlation comes into picture.
You need to promote both the fields in pro;perty schema but tied to common name. Have look at following article , which should clear all your doubts : https://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/13729.walkthrough-correlations-in-biztalk-orchestration.aspx
Maheshkumar S Tiwari|User Page|Blog|BizTalk
Server : How Map Works on Port Level

BizTalk Correlation in Orchestrations

Hello All,
I have a scenario in which in am calling an SP and it gives me a response. Now lets call the messagetype of Request Msg as Arequest and messagetype of Response Msg as Aresponse. There is a node in Arequest called ID. I am in innitialising a correlation in
Orchestration for that ID while sending the data to SP. when I recieve the response from SP I check if it is a 1 or a 0 if it is a 0 I have a receive shape with a following correlation of ID and a different messagetype say Debatch. If I get a 1 from SP I call
a view which will return a response with N number of ID. now I have to debatch for each ID to a messagetype debatch and then publish to the messagebox so that it can be subscribed by the dehydrated orchestrations (the receive shape that I was using for dehydration
earlier!) I am able to do all this but after debatching the orchestration I am getting a routing failure error in BizTalk. When I check the subscriptions for the suspended orchestaration the subscriptions are 1. for the the ID and 2 for the messagetype as
the root node of the debatched message.
please help

The send would been the result of some receive? you need to initialize on that receive and follow it up on the subsequent receive. That is how a "convoy" is created. A "convoy" is what will help you create the "order" that you
want. A "convoy" can be sequential - same receive location or parallel - different receive locations and/or different message types. Refer
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa561967.aspx for Implementation Design Patterns in BizTalk,
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa561843.aspx for Sequential Convoys and
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa546782.aspx for Parallel Convoys.
You correlate between a send (initialize) and receive (follow) when you want to correlate a request to a response over an ASYNC transport such as Queues.
Regards.

RNDisAssembler issue in Biztalk 2010 or 2009 accelerator for RosettaNet

We are receiving 3C3 PIP messages from a traing partner. But from time to time, below error pops out.
Source module:
RNDisAssembler
Correlation information:
Description:
Receive pipeline rejected incoming message
due to the following RNIF exception:
UNP.SCON.VALERR : A failure occurred while validating the service content.
Details:
Data at the root level is invalid. Line 3, position 1.
It's just once in a while. And I can't see any perceptible exception in the problematic message. This is so weird. I would assume it's a bug of Biztalk. Please refer to the post
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/955240/en-us, which provide a hotfix for BizTalk Accelerator for RosettaNet 3.5. Is there a counterpart for Biztalk 2010 or 2009?
Thanks
Gou Jun

Hi,
The resolution to this problem is descrived here:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/biztalkcpr/archive/2011/03/05/btarn-app-pool-settings-for-biztalk-2010.aspx
"Here is a some additional information regarding extending BTARN 2010 with new PIP’s. The artifacts generated are going to be .Net 4.0 unless Visual Studio is configured to do otherwise. This means along with setting the application pools for the
32-bit the .Net setting must be set to match. "
Sandro Pereira
DevScope | MVP & MCTS BizTalk Server 2010
http://sandroaspbiztalkblog.wordpress.com/ |
@sandro_asp
Oporto BizTalk Innovation Day | 14th March 2013 – Oporto, Portugal
Please mark as answered if this answers your question.

BizTalk 2010 Load Balancing Not So Balanced

Ok here's our scenario.
1. One Orchestration running under HostInstanceProcess on 3 servers in the same Groupe using 3 different domain accounts
2. That Orchestration has a reference to Utilities dll, which in turns calls a stored procedure using ADO.net code
3. We run that orchestration, it gets around 2000 de-batched messages and for those 2000 messages it calls that ADO.net code
4. Back in that database we run sp_who to check how many connections are made from each machine, and we find that over 60% connections are always made from one particular BizTalk machine and it's not one off, I've seen it atleast 7 to 8 times, that machine
always has most number of connections, for example if there are 120 connections in total, 80 connections are from Server 1 while rest from others.
5. We put a Max Pool connections in the connection string to 250 (default is 100) but that doesn't make any difference.
6. This interface is facing a lot of connection time outs from the database, hence this investigation is done
7. The same interface works perfectly fine on BizTalk 2006 R2, it's connecting to the same database (so can't be a database issue), it has 2 servers, which make almost same number of connections to the DB when I check with sp_who, so load balancing seems
to working as expected in BizTalk 2006 R2.
So my question, I know BizTalk is supposed to do load balancing in a round robin fashion which should equally distribute the load but in my example in BizTalk 2010, it's not doing that clearly, it's overloading one server with almost 70% of the requests,
what could be the reason for this? Host instances are set-up similarly in all servers. Any help greatly appreciated.
Regards
Syed

BizTalk load balancing works in Round Robin fashion only for the new messages, while in case of instance subscription message will be routed to server holding dehydrated orchestration instance.
So the server having dehydrated instances will receive the correlated response along with the new incoming message.
So you can see one server slightly overloaded.
Thanks,
Prashant
Please mark this post accordingly if it answers your query or is helpful.

EDI Batching Biztalk Server 2013

Hi All,
Please help me with configuration steps to do EDI batching (Outbound) in
Biztalk server 2013 Enterprise edition. No methods provided online worked. I need this urgent, pls help.
Thanks in advance.

The BatchMarker is a Pipeline Component but you're debugging through and Orchestration so there's a disconnect somewhere. Are you running the Pipeline in the Orchestration?
Either way, if the Message is being published from an Orchestration, any Promotedness from a Pipeline is not retained. You must use the Correlation Technique to Promote specific Context Properties from an Orchestration. Details here:
http://blogs.biztalk360.com/property-promotion-inside-orchestration/

Correlation with request response port

I created a correlation type and correlation set on the behalf of File.ReceivedFilName context property.
I am getting the initializing correlation set property in the send port as follows:
But in Receive Port I am not getting the Following correlation sets property as follows:
Why this is occuring ?
Am I doing something wrong ?
Is correlation supports with request response port ?
Prakash

Hi Prakash,
When you drop the Receive shape in your Orchestration, you would see both the “Initializing Correlation Set” and “Following Correlation Set” properties for the Receive Shape (same case for the Send Shape).
When you have linked the Receive Shape to the Request-Response port in your Orchestration (Request-Response port whose Port direction of communication is set to “I’ll be sending a request and receiving a response” property), the “Following
Correlation Set” property for the Receive Shape disappears (same case for the send shape). Because you have connected the send/Receive shape to the two send port and BizTalk can in turn handle the correlation. You don’t need to specify the correlation set
properties explicitly. These properties need to be configured only when you configure your send/Receive shape to one-way ports where you need to instruct BizTalk on how to handle the correlation not when you configure send/Receive shape to two way send port.
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Set up asyncronous correlation to MSMQ / Dynamics AX2012

Hi Pros,
I am using the MSMQ-Adapter to send an async. message to Dynamics AX2012. The message is processed by AX and the response is put to an outbound MSMQ directory.
BizTalk receives the response but i have problems setting up a working correlation so that the Orchestration can go on processing with the response message. I am currently getting a Routing-Failure.
I tried MSMQT.CorrelationId for the correlation without success. Is there anything in Dynamics AX I have to set up to make this work?

Hi Trombone,
As you are using One Way Send Port you will have to specifically maintain/manage Correlation between the outgoing and incoming message. You can do that by initializing any Correlation Set and later following the same on next receive shape.
For this either you will have to identify some common element between the outgoing and incoming message or create something like explained in below.
Please check the below example- Implementing Correlation (Property Promotion) without any Common Element
Thanks,
Prashant
Please mark this post accordingly if it answers your query or is helpful.

Biztalk sql design qoestion

Hi All,
I have a scenario where i will get the initial message into biztalk orch. From orch we will be calling REST service which in turn internally does the operation and update the sql db with status success and failure..
now when i send the message to Rest service i will get response "200 OK" but after that i want some mechanism where i will go and read the sql table for status and based on the status i need to go ahead...
i am not sure how to implement polling scenario in between the orchestration. Can you please help me on this.
Regards,
Amit
Regards, Amit More

Hi Sumit/Rachit/Boatseller,
Here is the requirement,
there are 8 REST services, REST service does some operation and update the status of the operation either success or failure in SQL DB.
1. I will get the message in orch
2. i need to call 1st REST service either it will be synchronous or asynchronous call, in synchronous call i will get the 200 ok response and after that i need to check the status of REST service operation in DB; in asynchronous i will send the
request and i need to look for the status from DB.
3. Based on the status i will go forward by calling other REST services.
As Sumit suggested that will be a one solution in case of single REST service call. But my other REST service call dependent of previous REST service call.
But i think that will be a good driving point, I will have a common orchestration which will monitor status table and on status change it will get notified, once it gets notified it will publish the message to messageBox.
now in my main orch after REST service call i will be having a receive shape which will be subscribing for the massage from common orch which will send the status and based on the status i will go forward. (may be i need to implement correlation)
Now i am not sure it will work or not, need to do POC and check.
if you have any other options do let me know.
Thanks,
Amit
Regards, Amit More

Enable Biztalk Failed Message Routing in Orchestration

In Biztalk Receive Port or Send Port, we can enable failed message routing such that error message will be routed to the message box for further processing and I can subscribe to those error reports and consume them.
Can I do the same in an orchestration? So for example, I have a correlation set, where my orchestration is going to wait for 2 messages before aggregating them and publishing a message to a send port.
So my receive shapes are in a scope shape and the scope shape has a timeout. So if the timeout elapses before the orchestration is completed then an exception will occur and the message will suspend.
What I'd like to do is have it not suspend, generate an error report which I can subscribe to and perform other logic, such as inform someone. I'd also like to include details about the message, or possibly the entire message that was received, which
appears difficult because the scope's exception block is not in scope of the message that was received.
I'd think that will correlation scenarios this would be a common problem. Any suggestions?

Hi Jeremy,
You have to use Exception Handling in Orchestration, I would ask you to go through following articles to understand how to work with exceptions in Orchestration:
A developers guide to handling exceptions in BizTalk Server
Using Transactions and Handling Exceptions
Maheshkumar
S Tiwari|User
Page|Blog|BizTalk
2013: Inserting RawXML (Whole Incoming XML Message) in SQL database

Correlation - Start orchestration

I have read on MSDN:
"BizTalk Server 2004 does not support convoy processing when passing in an already initialized correlation set into a new orchestration using the start orchestration. This is because convoy sets handle at the database level, independent of already running
orchestration instances."
Is it true for BizTalk 2010 also?
In this case, if BizTalk doesn't support convoy processing then why would someone want to pass a correlation set? What could be some scenarios in this case?
Thanks.

A Sequential Convoy is typically used to process in-order messages from a queue or debatched source. So it is highly likely that the first and following message will be routed almost immediately.
To accommodate this, the engine has special knowledge of the Sequential Convoy Pattern so it can route/correlate the message as expected.
If they allowed passing of a Correlation Set to a Started Orchestration, the engine would have to somehow know that is going to happen and without scanning the entire Orchestration, wouldn't know that.
In the time it takes to Initialize the first Orchestration, Initialize the Correlation Set, Publish the Start Orchestration Message, Initialize the Start'ed Orchestration, register the Correlation Set, etc. is relatively long compared to routing the second
Convoy message. Thus, when that second Convoy message is routed, it's highly probable that the Start'ed Orchestration hasn't even been Activated yet and you get the no subscriber error.

Processo NFE - Biztalk GRC

Bom dia a todos, estamos implementando NFE e gostaria de saber se alguem ja passou por algo parecido.
Iremos partir de um software em VB que ira enviar para o GRC via biztalk...alguem ja passou por essa situação? Gostaria de saber como o BIztalk irá startar, se possivel também, as RFC.
Obrigado,

Henrique,
Voce teria alguma documentação ou link referente a interface SOAP to RFC.
Como eu disse anteriormente, temos o seguinte cenario
Biztalk -> SAP GRC/PI -> Sefaz..
Preciso entender melhor a configuração necessária para a realização desse processo.
Obrigado mais uma vez.
Vinicius

Correlation in Biztalk.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for