Cost elements not included in Cost Component

We are getting an error which I do not get any clue.
In the costing run message is coming that Cost elements 670001 & 400098 not assigned to a cost component. However, when I checked the cost component structure, both these cost elements are included there. Then why the system is saying that they are not included in the cost component ?

Hi,
In the Costing data tab of the cost estimation screen you have Costing variant.
Click on the costing variant, then in the Assignment tab you have cost component structure filed click it and check which is being used.
Thanks & Regards,
Ravi

Similar Messages

Why is elements not included in creative cloud membership?

Why are photoshop elements and premiere elements not included in the 50 euro per month creative cloud membership? I thought this fee would entitle you to use all Adobe programs.

Adobe is clear on what's included in the Cloud - and it's never been all Adobe software. Mainly the software previously included in the Creative Suite Master Collection.
Explore Adobe desktop apps | Adobe Creative Cloud
Cloud members have access to Photoshop, Lightroom, Bridge and Premiere Pro.

DATE type returned from function does not return the time component

Hi,
I'm dealing with a strange problem. I have a PL/SQL function (running on Oracle 8.1.4.7) which returns a DATE value. Like we all know the DATE datatype includes a date component and a time component.
The function I used for testing is like this:
FUNCTION ReturnDate return Date is
dReturn Date;
Begin
select sysdate into dReturn from dual;
return dReturn;
end ReturnDate;
When I call this function from .NET using ODP.NET the date value I get does not have the time component included only the day-month-year components.
This is a code-snippet that calls the function :
command.CommandText="Schema.ReturnDate";
command.CommandType=CommandType.StoredProcedure;
command.Parameters.Add("Return_Value",
OracleDbType.Date,0,ParameterDirection.ReturnValue);
command.ExecuteNonQuery();
I use the OracleDbType.Date type which I think is the most logical choice, because the type in the Database is after all DATE.
However this does not include the time componet. But if I change the OracleDbType.Date to OracleDbType.TimeStamp I get the time component. I'm not happy with this "hack" because I'm not sure what will happen when we upgrade our version of the Database to Oracle 9i which uses the new TimeStamp datatype.
Is this a bug that the OracleDbType.Date does not include the time component??

How do you examine the output Date value?
If it is from the string, then the time components will
not show because the NLS_DATE format in the client
machine does not contain the time components.
In American, the Date format is 'DD-MON-RR' by default whereas, the TimeStamp format is 'DD-MON-RR HH.MI.SSXFF AM' by default.
Can you take a look at the time components from the OracleDate by accessing the time properties, eg. OracleDate.Hour, OracleDate.Minute..etc to see if the time values are there?
Thanks
Martha

Cost element 7000218 is not assigned to a cost component in CostCompStruct

Dear All,
How to change the standard price in MR21 for materials with Price Determination Control 3 ( header level V & 3) (Split level S & 3)
In MR21, when I am updating the price for initial stock uploading.
It throws me a error Cost element 7000218 is not assigned to a cost component in CostComp Struct 01
Actually the cost component structure 01 is not active. we are using OP cost component structure & it is active , further the assigned to the company code level.
Cost element 7000218 is assigned to the cost component structure OP.
please suggest why it result in above error, even though we are not using cost component structure 01.
Regards
Subbu.

Hi,
Did you change the cost component structure assignment for the plant ?
This error could be produced due to the fact that for this plant the cost component struture was changed from 01
But ML tables makes reference to the old cost component structure.
You can check table CKMLKEV.
During the creation of the material the system creates data for the current, previous and last period of the last year (12 2010).
Therefore the system tries/ needs to create also a cost componet split for the period 12 2010. For this it must used the cost component structure for this period 12 2010 (maybe 01).
In such a case you have to define the cost element in '01' as well.
Please do read note 434873 carefully for the side effect and correct procedure to change cost component structure.
regards
Waman

Cost element is not assigned to cost component structure

Dear Team,
While doing the settlemnt through KO88 system is showing the message like below
Cost element 433001 is not assigned to a cost component in CostCompStruct Z1
     Message no. MLCCS 010
Diagnosis
     You have activated the actual cost component split.
     No cost component has been assigned to cost element 433001 origin group
     in cost component structure Z1 for chart of accounts XXX. The system is
     unable to assign the value to a cost component.
System Response
     You cannot carry out posting.
Procedure
     Check whether for this operation the value to be posted is to be
     assigned to this cost element.
User has done tchnically completed from CO side .But system is showing the open status in FI.
So we have suggested to the user to do settlemt through KO88 system is showing the above message .Half of the production orders we can able to close through Ko88. Some of the PO we are facing the above issue.The concern GL account showing by the system is maintained as a sundry receivables a/c.
Please advice how to proceed further.
Thanks for the consideration.
Regards,
Suma

Dear Sir,
System is showing the GL account is not relating the cost element a/c ,The concern account belongs to Sundry receivables account.
The configuration is done correctly with all expenses GL a/c in OKTZ as well WIP accounts assigned corrctly in OKG8.                How the system is showing this account which i am not understanding.
Please advice to resolve.
Thanks for the consideration.
Regards,
Suma

Cost element is not assigned to a cost component

Dear All,
On trying to run costing for finished good having one BOM component, system create error in costing log as-
Message no-239-Cost element 954001 is not assigned to a cost component 1
On seeing details:
Cost element 954001 is not assigned to a cost component
Message no. CK239
Diagnosis
The system attempted to generate the cost component split for the material, but discovered that no assignment has been made in cost component structure Z2 for cost element 954001 and possibly for origin group .
System Response
The cost component split is incomplete. The cost of goods manufactured in the cost component split is therefore less than in the itemization.
ProcedureGo into Customizing for Product Cost Controlling and carry out the assignment for cost component structure Z2 and chart of accounts AICA.
where i am missing the required setting.
please guide
regards

Hi,
Use T.Code OKTZ for the relative cost element has to be assigned to one of the components there in
the cost component structure. Choose the nature of assignment for eg. raw material, choose the source and give the cost element. Then choose Assignment and give settlement through Cost center, Order.While coming back activate the cost component structure and save. Try for the Costing.
Regards,
Sadashivan

Reference to note 434873 - Auxiliary cost component split

1) We use material ledger. We already have a primary cost component split defined in our system.
2) We want to activate an auxiliary cost component split.
3) We read the note 434873, paragraph 2)b) (activating an auxiliary cost component split).
4) Who can assist us to develop the customer-specific Z program that is referenced in the note?

Hi to Evrybody,
I am trying to configure Primary Cost Component Split,, but I am confused what are the technical steps to configure such a structure 
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/en/7e/cb7e8643a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
There are several requirements how to configure in SAP Primary Cost Component Split:
1)You assign a cost component structure in the CO version in Cost Center and Process cost planning! Which Cost Component Structure? The Primary Cost Component Structure or the Cost Component Structure?
2)You determined the prices through planned price iteration! We set this indicator in the CO Version itself?
3)You define a Cost Component Structure for Primary Cost Component Split of Product Cost Planning! How do we define it, via simply checking the check in OKTZ?
I want to understand when you create Cost Component Structure and Primary Cost Component Structure, which one of these 2 needs to be assigned in the CO version in Cost Center Accounting? And the other thing is I do not make the difference between Cost Component Structure and Auxiliary Cost Component Structure? Could you please shortly describe what is the difference? Other thing is when you create Primary Cost Component Structure and its components, DO THEY INCLUDE ONLY RANGE OF PRIMARY COST ELEMENTS OR IT IS A TECHNICAL STEP ONLY TO CHECK THAT CHECK IN OKTZ FOR Primary Cost Component Split. Let me know, thank you very much for your help and cooperation again!
Best Regards,
Georgi Georgiev

Cost component not splitting at the time of Rune the tine of Cost Estimate

http//
Hi,
We are in developing phase for Product costing for coal mine project ,
we have raise coal material with Non component BOM , and Routing is only one activity with 400- Raised Coal Qty-MT ,
We upload the plan with Production cost center -activity type and cost element ( as per cost component -we have 10 cost component as per below )
RM - Blasting
Production Overhead
Power - Main
Stores,Spare,Consum
Repairs & Maint
Lease & Hire Char-PM
Power - Auxiliary
Depreciation
Over Burden
Development
we done the plan for Amount and Qty by KP06,KP26 and update plan price but system not calculate the cost component splitting in cost estimate as per planning while only one item showing for all cost to Production Overhead cost component
Production Overhead cost component which assign the secondary cost element which is assign to activity type 400
can any one help me to how we can resolve this issue
Please find attached document

Hi,
Here I am providing the necessity and importance of splitting structure, will share the configuration steps once you go through the following and get the comfort level.
                  Expense Analysis and Splitting in Manufacturing Cost Centers
Introduction In SAP Cost center work as a cost responsibility center, where all the expenses and cost are stored and analyzed for the purpose of management decision making.
The cost could be fixed or variable in nature. The difference between variable and fixed costs can be made in various ways in product costing in CO module.
Fixed costs represent the static costs incurred by the organization, which doesn’t change on the basis on manufacturing activities, which remain constant irrespective of production activities like rent for the premises, salaries of office staff etc.
On the other hand, variable cost varies based on the level of production activities; if production activities increase then variable cost also increased like electricity consumes raw material charges etc.
However all the variable cost doesn’t vary in direct proportion by quantity of goods produced.
In this document will try to define; how the Expenses analysis and splitting of cost done in manufacturing cost centers.
From controlling prospective, fixed cost remain constant regardless of operating activities, but if these factor changes, variable cost will fluctuate.
Basically raw material costs represent variable cost, but in this document main focused will be given to distinguish fixed and variable activity cost.
The segregation between fixed and variable cost is optional and is derived from the configuration and master data configured in cost center accounting and overhead accounting.
Activity Price:
There are different methods that could be used in cost center accounting to determine the activity price. The simple way is the manually enter “Fixed” and “Variable” Activity cost (KP26).
However there are other methods used in Cost center Planning and Budgeting that automatically calculate the fixed and variable activity price.
Here the focused will be given on Planning and Budgeting activity and automatic calculation of plan activity rate in cost center.
This method aggregate planned costs by cost element and capacity by plan unit to calculate the activity price.
Activity independent costs are segregated among different activities based on Splitting Structure, while activity dependent cost directly used for the purpose of variable activity rate calculation.
Fixed Activity Cost:
In product costing all those cost, which doesn’t vary based on the activities in manufacturing cost will represent fixed cost.
In a manufacturing cost centers there may be two or more activities performed.
To calculate the activities rate, the fixed costs are distributed to various activities on the basis of Splitting Structure defined for cost center.
Variable Activity Cost:
Variable activity cost, which directly depend upon the activity type and fluctuate based on increase or decrease in manufacturing activities. In SAP variable activity cost are directly linked to the respective activity.
Activity Prices: Fixed and Variable Split
In Cost Center Accounting dividing the cost between Fixed and Variable requires appropriate split to be made in the cost entered for the activity. The process is described below:
i. Variable cost would be planned at activity level and expenses should be maintained at cost element in the manufacturing cost center by assigning activity and cost element combination.
In other word, the expenses should be planned on Activity type at the time of primary cost planning (KP06).
Then the variable activity rates are calculated on Total cost planned at Activity divided by Total number of activity planned at that cost center (i.e. capacity in KP26)
ii. Fixed cost would be planned at independent of activity type. These costs are maintained in KP06 at cost element level on manufacturing cost center.
Then the fixed costs are distributed on various activity types on the basis of Splitting structure defined at OKEW.
In Splitting Structure we define the rules, how the fixed cost will be distributed to Activities. For the purpose of this document, considering split of fixed cost on the basis of Capacity maintained in KP26.
Regards,
Pavan kumar Arvapally

Primary cost component split not happening

Hello Experts,
I am trying to create a Primary cost component split for Products with following settings
1. Creation of Primary cost component structure "1N" and marking it as Primary cost component
2. Assigning the Primary cost elements to the Cost component structure
3. Assigning the Primary cost component structure for the Company code and Plant
4. Assigning the Primary cost component structure to "Version" under "Price calculation" tab.
5. Activity type with Activity type category "1- Manual entry, Manual allocation" and Price Indicator "1 - Plan price, automatically based on activity"
6. Activity output planning for Cost center
7. Primary cost planning for the Cost centers
8. Activity price calculation. (Update run) - Prices are changed in KP26 also
9. After all the above steps I checked report S_ALR_87013644, Plan price is existing in the report as mentioned in SAP note: 1658589
After all the above steps, I tried running Cost estimate for a product. I am getting the error message
Cost element 90001 is not assigned to a cost component
Message no. CK239
Also, I am getting a message
No structure could be determined for internal activity TEB (M0001)
Message no. CK694
Therefore the Cost component is showing only the Material component.
Where "90001" is a secondary cost element. I am not sure why system is still searching for Secondary cost element where we have assigned Primary cost component structure. I also ensured that Primary cost elements used in planning are all assigned to a Component in Cost component structure.
I checked for SAP note "1736332", which is not applicable for my system version. Current version of SAP_APPL is Release 606 and Support package SAPKH60607.
Please help. Am I missing any settings.
Thank you in advance.
Muneer Ahamed N

Hi Muneer,
Please check whether you have maintained cost center splitting structure properly and assigned to the respective cost center for which you have maintained output planning and input planning.
This splitting structure is much required because there only we maintain the relationship between primary cost elements and activities.
Coming to your first message, yes system expects maintenance of secondary cost elements also in the cost component structure which is not primary CCS.
Inorder to show primary cost component structure view:
First, system calculates the direct activity cost in terms of secondary cost elements...
Next, it verifies the cost center splitting structure you made,
Then, system is going to convert the direct activity cost in terms of primary cost elements based on the splitting structure and Finally displays the primary cost component view
I suppose second message speaking about cost center splitting structure only, please go through it carefully
Other than these whatever the process you specified is right only..
Regards...
Jose

Itemization does not match cost component split

Hi,
I need your help or could you please shed some light as to how to fix .
A new Overhead was created, in order to add expenses to the pricing of the product. For it a variant of different pricing to which is used currently was created, and so for maintain a historic one of the information.
In addition, in the cost component Structure an adjustment of the configuration was carried out, this was done because the previous the cost component Structure contained 18 elements of costs, which the most of the elements were specified as fixed and variable costs, therefore the system only permitted the addition of 2 more elements (SAP only permits 20 elements of fixed and variable costs), nevertheless was necessary to create a total of 23 elements of costs. For it the previous elements have to be modified and to change some elements as variable costs, specifically the elements corresponding to the accounts of materials. using tcode OKTZ
The addition of 5 more elements of costs, corresponding to overhead elements, where the type 41 costs classes were configured from the plan of surcharge created.
After carrying out the changes and to transport them the client of production, when i execute the T-code ck13n an inconsistency in the previous pricings was generated, because the cost component Structure was modified and the the following one Nº message was showed: CK869 " Mat.XXX in plant XXX: itemization does not match cost component split, the report of itemization shows different values to the reports of Costed Mutilevel BOM and of Cost Components. Additionally to the error shown by the system, also is observed that to the Cost Components report a cost in the new elements of overhead was added, even when the calculation of previous cost did not contain the determination of overhead.
In order to fix the error, I modified the cost component structure as it was before and the created another cost component structure with the required changes requested by the client specifying that it should start to be current this year. However after that change the error message nºCK869 continue: Mat. XXX in plant XXX: itemization does not match cost component split. Adding to that error message, the cost of the finished product changes with reference to the calculus of the previous product after modified the configuration and that is because the cost of the semifinished product is not being taken the values of the row material, and it is appearing with cost 0 and the only value that is taking on the matter are the costs of the activities types.

If you want the message to go away then you need to mark and releasse the estimate. However, there is no requirement that you do this. The message you are getting is an informational message only. You can continue without re-costing the item. If you do re-cost the material the new cost estimate will reflect and changes you've made to the components, so there is a good chance you will get a different value with the new estimate. So if that's ok, go ahead and mark and release the new estimate.

Cost component structure - cost elements for FERT and HALB (TC:OKTZ)?

Hi all,
our cost component structure has the following structure (TC: OKTZ):
1 Raw materials
2 Human ressources
3 Production
4 Material Overhead
5 Production overhead
6 external activity
(this settings are conform with SAP standard - copy from cost comp. structure 01)
To cost comp 1 "raw material" we assigend the relevant (primary) cost elements (consumption raw mat, e,g, steel, wood...).
My question is: In case we insert/post e.g. a semi-finished product to the production order from stock (accor. bill of material), where (in which cost comp.) do I have to assign the relevant cost element? I guess this should be the account "inventory change unfinished product? (maintain in TC: OBYC for transaction BSV according val. class)
Is it correct to assign this cost element to cost comp structure "raw material", because actually it is a semi finished product which is picked up from stock to convert /process further? To problem is, if this cost element is not assigned I get an error in CK11N/CK40N
I hope my wording is not to abstract...
Thanks in advance...
best Regards

Hi..
You don’t need to consider the cost element of production order settlement and production notification.
Cost component structure need the cost element of production order’s debit.

How Cost component Determines The Correct Cost Elements?

Hi,
In the cost component views i have cost element XXX is mapped to cost component Local raw materials and cost element YYY to imported raw materials and my local raw materials are linked to BSX inventory accounts of ZZZ. In this regard i have the following questions :-
1) When i create cost estimates (t.code CK11N) for a local raw material the system is showing this costs correctly under local raw material cost component, how the system know that this is local raw material and not an imported raw material? Because no where in the config settings i have mapped cost element XXX to local raw materials because XXX is a consumption cost element. The only config i have maintained for this raw material is linking it to the ZZZ account which is the balance sheet stock account. So how the system will determine this particular material is linked to cost element XXX and not YYY?

Hi,
Please check assignment cost component structure your assign the purticular cost element your assigned that cost element is showing the costing sheet in ck11n report for ram material import or local.
Regards
Mastan Reddy N

Product costing - cost elements not to be created

Hi
Can any one suggest on the list of G/L accounts for which cost elements not be created in CO in terms of product costing?
thanks
Moderator: Please, search before posting

hi,
Cost elements need to be created for those you want assign in your cost component structure.
Secondary cost elements for over heads material, Production with category - 41,
Cost elements for WIP calculation (All costs, Material costs)- 31 category
Cost elements for RA.
Primary cost elements are some how need to be created for the P/L accounts.
secondary cost elements are which are used inturn used for production process like over heads etc.
Why you are worried about GLs & cost elements not to be created.
Which are require you create them.
Edited by: santosh kumar on Feb 6, 2012 4:47 AM

Error message: cost elements have no cost component structure

using transaction KSII for the report; we didn´t change any settings, but we get this warming in the system.
We don´t know what happens, because it was ok in december, but know we have this warning.
The version for the year 2009 is maintained.
Any ideas?

There might be some new cost elements which would incurred actual costs which were not available in 2008 as well as in Cost component Structure.
Anyways try maintaining the cost elements in Cost Component structure.

Material Ledger: Cost Component Split (Elements) table CKMLKEPH

Hi All,
Whats the use of this table, what information get updated in this table while creating invoice.
Message was edited by:
Alexander

Hi Alexander,
CKMLKEPH belongs to material ledgers actual cost component split database:
Differences from Actual Costs to Standard Price
Entries per material, update, cost element structure, kind of difference and level
Created per any update where occur differences
so if ML is active with actual CCS and your invoice has a price diference than CKMLKEPH will store the split of the price difference posting.
it is related to CKMLKEV.
this note gives some further links
<a href="https://websmp206.sap-ag.de/~form/handler?_APP=01100107900000000342&_EVENT=REDIR&_NNUM=398941&_NLANG=E">Note 398941 - INFORMATION: CO-PC-ACT (Data structures)</a>
best regards,
Udo

Cost elements not included in Cost Component

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for