Cost element 7000218 is not assigned to a cost component in CostCompStruct

Dear All,
How to change the standard price in MR21 for materials with Price Determination Control 3 ( header level V & 3) (Split level S & 3)
In MR21, when I am updating the price for initial stock uploading.
It throws me a error Cost element 7000218 is not assigned to a cost component in CostComp Struct 01
Actually the cost component structure 01 is not active. we are using OP cost component structure & it is active , further the assigned to the company code level.
Cost element 7000218 is assigned to the cost component structure OP.
please suggest why it result in above error, even though we are not using cost component structure 01.
Regards
Subbu.

Hi,
Did you change the cost component structure assignment for the plant ?
This error could be produced due to the fact that for this plant the cost component struture was changed from 01
But ML tables makes reference to the old cost component structure.
You can check table CKMLKEV.
During the creation of the material the system creates data for the current, previous and last period of the last year (12 2010).
Therefore the system tries/ needs to create also a cost componet split for the period 12 2010. For this it must used the cost component structure for this period 12 2010 (maybe 01).
In such a case you have to define the cost element in '01' as well.
Please do read note 434873 carefully for the side effect and correct procedure to change cost component structure.
regards
Waman

Similar Messages

CK11N alert:"Costing item 00001 is not assigned to a cost component"

Hi,
     When I use CK11N, fill in all the necessary field, there will appear a alert.
      The detail as follows:
Costing item 00001 is not assigned to a cost component
Message no. CK 334
Diagnosis
No cost component is assigned to costing item 00001.
System Response
The costs for the costing item are not shown.
Procedure
Go into Customizing for Product Cost Controlling and check the assignment of cost elements to cost components.
       I have used KA03,KL03,CR03 to checked previous datas, but I find no errors?
What is the problem?

Hi,
Use OKTZ to create cost component structure.
Check for some of these settings also
Configuration:
Define costing sheets
OKTZ create cost component structure
OKK4 Define valuation variant
OKKN Define cost variant
Master Data:
KP26 setup activity rates
CR01 setup work centers
MM01 setup material masters
CS01 setup Bill of Materials
CA01 setup routings
Regards,
Murali

Cost element is not assigned to a cost component

Dear All,
On trying to run costing for finished good having one BOM component, system create error in costing log as-
Message no-239-Cost element 954001 is not assigned to a cost component 1
On seeing details:
Cost element 954001 is not assigned to a cost component
Message no. CK239
Diagnosis
The system attempted to generate the cost component split for the material, but discovered that no assignment has been made in cost component structure Z2 for cost element 954001 and possibly for origin group .
System Response
The cost component split is incomplete. The cost of goods manufactured in the cost component split is therefore less than in the itemization.
ProcedureGo into Customizing for Product Cost Controlling and carry out the assignment for cost component structure Z2 and chart of accounts AICA.
where i am missing the required setting.
please guide
regards

Hi,
Use T.Code OKTZ for the relative cost element has to be assigned to one of the components there in
the cost component structure. Choose the nature of assignment for eg. raw material, choose the source and give the cost element. Then choose Assignment and give settlement through Cost center, Order.While coming back activate the cost component structure and save. Try for the Costing.
Regards,
Sadashivan

CO-PC Cost components are not assigned when actual cost was posted

Hi Expert,
I estimate material cost by Tcode CK11N, the result is cost components were assigned to plan cost. It's okay. But, I have a problem when posting actual cost.
After actual cost was posted by confirming backflush, I run Tcode KKBC_PKO to check again, but Cost Component field is not assigned to actual cost.
Please tell me the reason.
Regard,

Hi,
Thank for your answer.
I will check Cost component Structure, and ensure that all cost elements were assigned.
Additional, cost components were assigned to PLAN cost, but not assigned to ACTUAL cost.
Do I have to configure something more?
Regard,

Permit not assigned for Actual cost

Hi Dears,
Permit not assigned for actual cost in maint order
Actual cost in maintenance order is 3000
In IPMD, cost1 is assigned with class ACTUAL COST and value 3000 is defined.
In OIPG, Permit class ACTUALCOST is assigned.
Goods issue done to order for value 3000.
Again cost determination executed, but still cost1 is not assinged to the work order.
Am i missing anything ?
Regards,
Alagesan M

Hi
In charac CT04 i maintained one value 3000 and table maintained CSEVPERMIT and IKOSTEN
In class CL01, assigned the charac for 049 class type
In OIPG, permit class is maintained with class
In IPMD, new permit created and assigned class in classification and maintained 3000
Now order created and component assigned the planned value is 3000.
through MIGO goods issue done and found the actual value is 3000.
But still opened the permit found nothing assigned.
For Estimated cost and planned costs it is working good only for actual cost permit is not assigning.
Actual cost we need to anything more other than this ?
Alagesan

Cost element 41 is not getting displayed in basic data Cost Element Basic..

Hello All,
Need you help in understanding and solving this issue, when ever I am creating a GL account in P&L, primary cost element is getting created, that is perfect, but for some G/L account I want to assign to CElem category to 41 for overhead, but due to some reason, only see 6 cost element category when try to look into mirror glass, or F4, only can see (1, 3, 4, 11, 12, 22). Please suggest how can I fixed this. If some one is having hard time understanding my question please feel free to write me.
Thanks
Nishan

Christian,
I belive you have not understood this issue, here I am not asking the difference between primary and secondary, let me articulate it one more time:
When you create a G/L account under expenses for P&L and it create Primary cost element and instead of allocating it to primary costs/ cost-reducing revenue want to make it to 41 overhead cost element. but I dont see the option of 41 just see 6 option ( 1 for primary costs/ cost-revenue reducing revenues. 3 - Accrual, 4 , 11= revenue, 12 = sales deduction and 22 external settlement, and where as I dont see 41, what setting need to be changed so that I can see all the cost element type.
thanks

Secondary cost element actual data not posted

Hi Gurus,
Actually we are posting the actual cost elements data into particular cost cenetr through batch job.upto 12/31/2009 the actual data is showing for the particular secondary cost element(overheads).Only after 01/01/2010 the actual data is not posted for this particular cost element inthat particular cost center.For the remining cost elements into that particular cost cnetr the actual data is posted thru batch job.We checked that particularsecondary cost element,the validity period is upto 31/12/9999.Suggest on this one.
Thanks in advance
Jana

Hi,
Did you execute overhead allocation processes as from 01/01?
Regards,
Eli

Report painter cost elements description is not picking

HI
Report painter Consolidation system - in which the description of the cost elements are not able to display while runnning the GR55 by giving the Report group PCC2
Please assist me
Regards

Hello,
when you plan with trx. 7KE5, activity will be PCAK.
Report group 8A80 should show the figures correctly. When I plan with 7KE5 and afterwards run the report, the activities PCAK and RKP4 are shown.
Maybe your report is not correct. You should import report group 8A80 from client 000 with trx. GR59. Afterwards you have regenerate the report group. Does the report afterwards show the figures?
Have you checked with trx. 2KEE or KE5Y if the values are shown there?
In case it is not shown in 2KEE and KE5Y - have you saved the planned values?
Cheers,
Daniela

Standard cost element reports are not available

Hi everyone,
I noticed that there are no standard cost element reports available in our SAP application. Is this because they are not imported or is this caused by another problem ?
Help would be greatly appreciated and points will be rewarded
Kind regards
Message was edited by:
Björn Demol
Message was edited by:
Björn Demol

can you tell me how did u resolve this issue
Regards
Bilal

Costing item 00002/00003/000 (item no) is not assigned to a cost component

Hi
I am getting this error for many material which are having procurment type as 'F' external procurment and special procurment as '30'-30 subcontracting.
I have also maintained the info record in ME11 for subcontracting.
Costing variant detail: Valuation variant for subcontracting is 'net quotation price'. I am getting this error irrespective of whether I use transfer control or not.
Appreciate an early reply.
Thanks
govind

Hello Govind
If you look at the FI postings of subcontracting GR and IR, it is like a hybrid of purchase and production. The price you pay to the vendor is of course a part of the cost calculation of this product.
The subcontract cost account assignment is done in OBYC -> FRL.
Junqi

Secondary cost element report to show the balance of cost elemnets in OKG4

Hi
I have assinged two CE ex: 934 and 935 in OKG4 and included in Cost component structruee (is it required or not?)
created Production order and did GI and GR andf WIP.
WIP posted against 934 and 935 that i can see from cost analysis.
when i try to execute the reort S_SL0_21000007 with CE 934 and 935 icouldnot able to see the details.
Can you please help me from where i can see the postings for CE's (Secondary)
in cost analysis against only these two line items getting message Without origin
Please help.
Thanks,
Sudha

Pl try running GRR3 > Expand library 6O1 > Report 6OAB-001 Orders: Accruals. It will show you the postings in these cost elements. I am not aware of a transaction that calls this report directly.
Regards
Subodh

How to delete cost element name from group after deleting the cost element

Hi,
Please let me know how to delete the cost element number from the Cost element group hierarchy.I have deleted cost element but still showing only the CE number---no valid master record.If I d not want this to be visible within hierarchy let me know what should I do.
Thanks

Hi
Go to change cost element group select the cost element click on select tab (3rd Tab from Left) it will take u to new screen in that screen select remove tab (1st tab from left)
Regards
Sandesh

Cost estimate (CK11N)is not picking the overhead cost for some of the mat

Hi all,
we are facing a problem. The overhead key is defined. the calculation base is defined in the cost sheet. But the overhead cost is not picking for some of the materials
Bad Material 5019-0581 via CK11n.
As you can see in the itemization, only the material and the routing are listed. No amounts from the OH of ZPTA ( .10). It should show a line #5 with an amount of (28 quantity x .10) = $2.80 added to the Total value.
first three line items it is picked from material and fourth line item from the internal activity.
the fifth item from G overhead is not picked.

Hi,
Check whether u have assigned the cost sheet in u r costing variant which is being used in CK11N.
Regards
SudhakarReddy

Cost of producion item not related to actual costs of items isued to prod

I have a scenario where a production order for producing a quantity of one of a specific item has been created and released. The Planned quantity of the unique Item used for production in Components Tab is 10, the Issue method is Manual
In Issue for production screen the quantity recorded is 12, 2 more than the planned
Then the receipt for production has been recorded for 1 item.
Valuation method for all involved items is Moving Average
The system behavior expected by myself was the cost of the produced item was the cost of the component multiplied by 12. However the cost the system calculates is the cost of the component multiplied by 10.
While the Summary of the production order shows Actual Component Cost as multiplied by the Actual Product Cost is just multiplied by 10
Some ideas here?
Julio

Suda,
Many thanks for your answer. I will try to explain the business scenario and why I think the cost should be different . In my explanation the sequence of actions and people performing actions is relevant.
1. Product Engineering clerk determines producing parent item will require 10 components and based of that the BOM is created by Product Engineering clerk with 10.
2. Production planning clerk creates production order based on BOM
3. Production planning clerk releases the order
4. Production clerk (the actual performer) requires 5 components to raw material warehouse (nothing recorded in SAP)
5. Warehouse clerk 1 (at raw material warehouse) gives 5 components to production clerk. Warehouse clerk 1 uses Issue for Production transaction to record 5 components issued to production order
6. Production clerk identifies that for this specific production order 10 components should not be enough so for finishing the order requires 7 components to raw material warehouse (again, nothing recorded in SAP)
7. Warehouse clerk 1 gives 7 components to production clerk. Warehouse clerk 1 uses Issue for Production transaction to record 7 components issued to production order
8. Warehouse clerk 2 (at finish goods warehouse) receives the item produced and uses Receipt from production transaction to record 1 item received
From 4 to 8 actions the interaction is just between production clerk and warehouse clerks. It is not expected warehouse clerks neither production clerk have access to modify production order details. They just record what they do.
At the end of the day the reality is that this specific product just produced costed more because more components were used (think the components can be kilograms of a substance or even pieces that can be with some defects just identified at production). And yes, there is a variance between the original order details and the actual components used. All this is shown at Order Summary Tab.
But if the product is been valued using moving average method why the real components issued to production are not used to calculate the cost of the finished product and rather the "planned" components are been used?
I have tried the option you mention. To modify directly the order but to issues arise from here.
a) Every single time some extra components are required the Production planing clerk has to updated the order?
b) If we do so no variance is reported and no action can be taken to avoid this variance.
Your thoughts?
Julio

Cost element is not assigned to cost component structure

Dear Team,
While doing the settlemnt through KO88 system is showing the message like below
Cost element 433001 is not assigned to a cost component in CostCompStruct Z1
     Message no. MLCCS 010
Diagnosis
     You have activated the actual cost component split.
     No cost component has been assigned to cost element 433001 origin group
     in cost component structure Z1 for chart of accounts XXX. The system is
     unable to assign the value to a cost component.
System Response
     You cannot carry out posting.
Procedure
     Check whether for this operation the value to be posted is to be
     assigned to this cost element.
User has done tchnically completed from CO side .But system is showing the open status in FI.
So we have suggested to the user to do settlemt through KO88 system is showing the above message .Half of the production orders we can able to close through Ko88. Some of the PO we are facing the above issue.The concern GL account showing by the system is maintained as a sundry receivables a/c.
Please advice how to proceed further.
Thanks for the consideration.
Regards,
Suma

Dear Sir,
System is showing the GL account is not relating the cost element a/c ,The concern account belongs to Sundry receivables account.
The configuration is done correctly with all expenses GL a/c in OKTZ as well WIP accounts assigned corrctly in OKG8.                How the system is showing this account which i am not understanding.
Please advice to resolve.
Thanks for the consideration.
Regards,
Suma

Cost element 7000218 is not assigned to a cost component in CostCompStruct

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for