CPF contribution is not deducting on AWS amount for retried employee.

Hi,
Issue reported: - CPF contribution is not deducting on AWS amount for retried employee.
fyi -even though employee is separated his bonus will be paid in month of December
I have checked the AWS wage type, the culmination class 3 is checked, as it is an addition wage type. And its 0185 and 0186 is not delimited also.
How can I found out the root cause?
Regards
Thomas
Edited by: Thomas Padiyara on Dec 9, 2010 2:49 AM

Patch updates issue.

Similar Messages

Absences not deducted from Absence Quota for One Employee

Dear Friends,
I am facing an issue for one employee, when I recorded an Annual Leave absence to him, it is not updated in his Absence quotas infotype. But this is working fine for all other employees in the same employee group/subgroup grouping.
But for Sick Leave absence type, it is updating in his absence quota records...
I have checked the counting rules, deduction rules, base entitlement rules and other configuration settings.......It is fine and for other employees belonging to the same grouping, it is working fine, except this employee...
I couldn't understand what will be the reason? Can anyone shed light on this issue?
Thanks in advance,
Sai Narayana,
SAP Functional Consultant.

Hi JS,
I am checking the absence is deducted or not from his entitlement in the infotype 2006 after running the payroll for that month......
The employee has taken leave on last month and the payroll is also run for that month.......This Absence is not deducted from his quota......
I have checked for another employee in this department, no error/issue with that employee.......Only with this employee I am facing problem.....
I found -
1. The Absence Quota balance which is present in Infotype 2006 is not the same which is displayed in Remuneration Statement ( leave balance is displayed in payslip for every employee)
2. Annual leave is not deducted from the employee's entitlement where as sick leave is deducted. I have checked the deduction rule too for this grouping, it is right.No issues in that.
3. Absence Quota generation also produced different results when run time evaluation thru PT60.....which is not according to the entitlement to this employee grouping that too for this employee only.
Or Friend, can you tell me some other option, to overcome this issue.....instead of repairing this all the time.......
Thanks,
Sai

ER Contribution should not Deduct from EE SAL and not Display in Payslip.

Hi Experts,
I have Pension ER contribution Wage type:
1. That should not deduct from Employee SAL
2. Should not display in Payslip.
3. Amount store in RT.
What changes i should do in V_T512W_D table
Appreciate your early response.
Regards
Raj

Hi,
We are maintaining the EE & ER contribution.
EE is working fine with all the validation & deducting from employee every month.
When we are handling ER contribution that amount is getting deducted from EE sal.
So we want to restrict ER contribution Deducting from employee sal and not to display in Payslip.
Figuring out how can we handle this thru Processing, Cumulating or Evaluation class.
Kindly advise
Regards
Raj

Esic contribution is not deducting on seperation cases in retro run.

Dear Experts,
Employee was got seperated in previous month (for example Oct) and now while executing retro run (Dec) for those employee ESIC is not contributing even though they comes in esic eligibility.
Please advise.

Yeah, IN42 to 44 are activated,
ZN42 Formation of differences, transfer of n
        WGTYP?     Query wage type
          /3EA
            ELIMI *    Elim.time period ID
            SUBWTD/AEA DT   Difference tab.
ZN43 Store the differences in DT (India)
        WGTYP?     Query wage type
          /3EA
            ELIMI *    Elim.time period ID
            ADDWTD/AEA DT   Difference tab.
            INESR /AEA DT
/AEA
ELIMI *    Elim.time period ID
ADDWTI/ZEA IT   Input table
and only /zea is reflecting in RT

Batch quantity not deducting when FIRST date (for line item) is in future.

Hi Folks,
            My requirement is when creating sales order for batch managed materials, if i give any quantity with future date that is,
if todays date is 02.07.2010 and if i create sales order..
material    => mat1
Quantity   => 20
Date   => 12.07.2010     (this is not required delivery date,this is first delivery date in schedule line for that item)
Batch => B1
and initially if Batch B1 has quantity 100 ,after saving this sales order, the quantity must be 80.
but its not deducting, for future dates ,thats why the same batch is showing quantity 100, next time
when i m creating new sales order.where as it should show 80.
where exactly the quantity deduction is carried out (include or PAI PBO modules).
any hints.
I appreciate your response.
Thanks

Hi Folks,
            My requirement is when creating sales order for batch managed materials, if i give any quantity with future date that is,
if todays date is 02.07.2010 and if i create sales order..
material    => mat1
Quantity   => 20
Date   => 12.07.2010     (this is not required delivery date,this is first delivery date in schedule line for that item)
Batch => B1
and initially if Batch B1 has quantity 100 ,after saving this sales order, the quantity must be 80.
but its not deducting, for future dates ,thats why the same batch is showing quantity 100, next time
when i m creating new sales order.where as it should show 80.
where exactly the quantity deduction is carried out (include or PAI PBO modules).
any hints.
I appreciate your response.
Thanks

Absence Deduction is calculated wrong for one employee

Hi, We have an employee who changed his absence booking for the year and all of sudden his absence deduction is not calculating properly. His total absence quota was 20 days. He initially booked all 20 days and then cancelled them and created a new booking for 9.5 days but his deduction is saying 16.5 days.
Is there a way I can check his records why it's only happening to him. Also I am new to this so not sure where to start investigating. I did check the deduction rule and it's ok - calculates correctly for other employees, only this particular employee is calculating wrong.

Hi Joe,
I did replicate it for another employee belonging to the same group and it calculated correctly. And the 9.5 days already excludes holidays and weekends. Not sure what else to check at this point. Although the only difference in the records of the 2employees is that the problematic employee has a negative carryover from previous year. not sure exactly what that means.

Query To Return Sale Amount For Specified Employee

Below is my DDL - How can (in one query) I input an employee name and from the given employee name display all stores that were worked at and Total sale amounts per store for the specified employee? Sample output would be
Store Name Employee Name Sale Amt
Two afaslkfasd
100
Five aslkjfla 300
Create Table StoreInfo
storeid int IDENTITY(1,1) PRIMARY KEY,
storename varchar(100),
employeeid int,
employee varchar(100)
Create Table SaleInfo
saleid int IDENTITY(1,1) PRIMARY KEY,
storeid int,
employeeid int not null,
saleamount int,
dateofsale SMALLDATETIME null
INSERT INTO StoreInfo VALUES
('One', 1, 'Mike Jones'),
('Two', 2, 'Lee Jones'),
('Three', 3, 'Fred Marx'),
('Four', 4, 'Lillard Halfling'),
('Five', 5, 'Joey Fratada'),
('Six', 6, 'Lethan James'),
('Seven', 7, 'Four-Finger Charlie'),
('Eight', 8, 'Twice Sold'),
('Nine', 9, 'Richard Jackson'),
('Ten', 10, 'Fred Mitch')
INSERT INTO SaleInfo VALUES
(1,1,452, '12-21-14'),
(1,1,452, '9-7-14' ),
(1,2,500, '12-7-14' ),
(1,3,100, '3-12-14' ),
(1,6,275, '12-2-14' ),
(1,7,800, '1-12-14' ),
(2,4,200, '2-16-14' ),
(2,5,110, '12-7-14' ),
(2,1,120, '8-12-14' ),
(2,3,320, '2-22-14' ),
(3,3,50, '3-12-14' ),
(3,1,75, '8-2-14' ),
(3,8,20, '7-12-14' ),
(3,9,42, '12-8-14' ),
(4,10,52, '12-16-14' ),
(4,1,152, '12-4-14'),
(4,8,452, '5-1-14'),
(4,7,752, '2-28-13' ),
(4,6,52, '1-22-14' ),
(4,2,42, '12-28-13' )

Thank you for trying to post the DDL we need to answer this. But you do not know RDBMS, or industry and ANSI/ISO standards in your data. You should learn ISO-11179 rules for naming data elements. You should follow ISO-8601 rules for displaying temporal
data. Your choice of proprietary date format is literally the worst way to do it! Why do you think that IDENTITY has any place in RDBMS? Where were you when they discussed keys? You also have no idea what a normalized table is. An employee has a relationship
with a store; he is not an attribute of one! When you fire an employee, you destroy a store in your schema.
Do people in your world have hundred letter names? The Post office uses 35 for an address line. If you invite garbage data, it will come.
Why do you think that “_info” is a valid table name? Why are prices expressed in integers and not decimals? What currency on Earth is not decimal?
You need to read and download the PDF for:
https://www.simple-talk.com/books/sql-books/119-sql-code-smells/
Below is my DDL - How can (in one query) I input an employee name and from the given employee name display all stores that were worked at and Total sale amounts per store for the specified employee?
Why don't you use DRI? That is what RDBMS is all about.
CREATE TABLE Stores
(store_nbr CHAR(3) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY
CHECK (store_nbr LIKE '[0-9][0-9][0-9]'),
store_name VARCHAR(35) NOT NULL);
CREATE TABLE Personnel
(employee_id CHAR(10) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
employee_name VARCHAR(35)NOT NULL);
Since we have no business rules, I will assume each employee is at one and one store, but a store can have many employees.
CREATE TABLE Job_Assignments
(store_nbr CHAR(3) NOT NULL
REFERENCES Stores(store_nbr)
employee_id CHAR(10) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY
REFERENCES Personnel (employee_id));
The sales tickets can be a CREATE SEQUENCE but let's skip that for now. I swill not re-copy your data into this valid schema, but you might want to do it to learn how.
CREATE TABLE Sales
(sale_ticket INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
store_nbr CHAR(3) NOT NULL
REFERENCES Stores(store_nbr)
employee_id CHAR(10) NOT NULL
REFERENCES Personnel (employee_id),
sale_amount DECIMAL(12,2) NOT NULL,
sale_date DATE DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP NOT NULL);
>> How can (in one query) I input an employee name and from the given employee name display all stores that were worked at and Total sale amounts per store for the specified employee? <<
SELECT employee_name, store_name,
SUM(T.sale_amount) AS sales_amt_tot
FROM Sales AS T, Personnel AS P, Stores AS S
WHERE P.employee_name = @in_employee_name
AND T.employee_id = S.Employee_id
AND T.store_id = S.store_id
GROUP BY employee_name, store_name;
--CELKO-- Books in Celko Series for Morgan-Kaufmann Publishing: Analytics and OLAP in SQL / Data and Databases: Concepts in Practice Data / Measurements and Standards in SQL SQL for Smarties / SQL Programming Style / SQL Puzzles and Answers / Thinking
in Sets / Trees and Hierarchies in SQL

Total compensation statement is not showingup in ESS portal for an employee

HI Experts,
One of my employee could nt able to view his total compensation statement through ESS portal.It is showing only blank.
I have checked the integration PCOMP SFTCS in T77S0 table and is with ZHR_CM_TCS.
What could be the reasons for showingup only the blank screen without values.
Please advice me to resolve the problem.
Regards,
Sairam.

Thread is closed without responses.
Sairam.

Pension Contribution not deducting correctly and Arrears

Dear Experts!
I am facing with a big problem with calculation Pension Contribution in India Payroll.
First, the issue with employee join into company in middle month, i have modified EXIT_HINCALC0_002 and it's right.
However, the problem when a employee has an arrears of last month, so my customer requires that: base on /111 + arrears to decide the amount of Pension Contribution.
If /111 + arrears >= 6500 so assigning /3FC = 6500
Else /3FC = /111 + arrears.
But I don't know, how to calculate arrears in FUINEPF to choose the suitable value for /3FC.
Please help me. Thank a lot.

Thank for your reply.
I have read the note and see that: this is the problem when employee joined in the middle month <not from 1st of month>. However, I have fixed this problem. And the result is OK.
The issue now is to decide value of /3FC not only base on /111 but also amount of Arrears. I don't know how to calculate Arrears, especially in FUINEPF.

Re: Pension Contribution not deducting correctly

Dear Gurus,
When an employee is hired in the mid-month, the Employee and Employer pension contribution is not getting deducted properly.
if the basic is greater than 6000 employer pension should deduct 541. it is not deducting correctly when the joining date is greater than 1st of the month.
Kindly help to sort out this issue.
Thanks
Anbu

For mid-month Hiree and Termination on Savings Plans and Pensions - there are certain SAP notes that need checked. I found one for Savings plan contribution -
0000725626 - Savings/ retirement plan not processed in first period
I have seen another note for India Benefits that may be of help to you.
SAP Note 1160806 -PF and Pension contri.for mid-month joining & termin.
Please verify that these are part of your code line. Although these may be old fixes, it is better to verify rather than assuming ECC6 has these already.
Hope this helps,
Roopa

ESI is not deducting for an employee who has joined after 23?

Dear All,
With reference to issue, ESI is not deducting for the employee who has joined on or after 23 of march month.
Ex. He has gross of 9400 and /3EA is 2729 and the value of contribution is 45. But ESI is not deducting.
But for other employee same salary and he has joined on 16 march,for him ESI is deducting.
Thanks for all,
Regards,
Sujesh R

Wrong forum.
FF

TDS Not deducted at the time of Vendor out going payment (F-53)

Dear All,
First we did prepayment through F-47, iam tryin to clearing the vendor payment amount through F-53 , at this TDS amount not deducted for that payment. can any one solve this issue as soon as possible....
Thanks & Regards
Vijay Kumar

Hello vijay,
TDS should be deducted at time time of Advance Payment or Invoice Booking only, not in F-53( Payment against invoice).
if Payment is made in Advance you must have deducted tds amount. f-53 is normally using for payment against invoicing.
and invoicing is already done with deduction of tds.
Regards
Vishal Sonawane

PS - PO Excise Value not deducted from Project Available Budget

Hello SAP Gurus,
My problem is that when an Excisable PO is created against SAP Project then the Excise Value is not included in Budget - Commitment/Actual Amounts.
PO Basic Value + Tax (VAT/CST) is deducted from Available Budget, but Excise value is not deducted even after Invoice Booking.
Please let me know where do I need to change so that the complete PO value is deducted from Available Budget.

Hi Bindal,
Origin of Project costs lies in other modules.
Pls get you Tax procedure checked by FI/MM. In Tax procedure there will be various Conditions used by your organization. Each Condition type will have an Account Key.
If that account key has 'Non Decutible' checked then the related tax amount will form cost on your project and vice versa.
if your organization is producing something using thses input materials then it would want to benifit itself by taking credit for Modavat/Cenvat against the Excise and other recoverable taxes it paid during the purchase of input materials.
Hence as a correct business practise such taxes will be correctly set as 'Dedutible' in Tax settings so that instead of getting inventorized the'y be offsetted and amount would be posted to some clearing amount.
In short MM would (correctly) not recognize these taxes amounts as cost and thus these values will not flow to PS also as Commitment cost or actual/statistical cost.
with regards,
Ravi Shrivastav

Garnishment is not deducted completely in the payroll.

Hi,
I have a scenario where an employee have more than one garnishment. When I execute the payroll I saw that one of the garnishments is not deducted completely as you can see in the following screen:
How can I fix this to take the full amount (16.56)?
Thanks!
Carlos

Hello Carlos,
As you can see limit is 339.48 and already taken is 323.07, so the balance is 339.48 - 323.07 = 16.41, Since balance is 16.41 left to reach the limit 339.48, so it has deducted 16.41 only and not 16.56.
With Regards,
S.Karthik

Bug found: Purchases on iTunes Wifi do not deduct from Giftcards

Ok...
So only had the toy for a few hours. However, I think I might have already found a bug with it. Anyone else tried purchasing music that with credits from promotions or giftcards. I have 35 Song Credits on iTunes, but just tried purchasing a song on the iTouch and found it did not deduct my credits. Ouch, not cool.
-Brett

I also have a gift card dredit right now. I've bought a few songs on wi-fi and what i've found is that once you sync your ipod to your computer, itunes should deduct the amount from your store credit, not your credit card. when i did this it didn't show that it deducted right away, but when i clicked on my account name (in the topright corner) to view my account, it was deducted. and my e-mail receipt said it was charged to store credit.

CPF contribution is not deducting on AWS amount for retried employee.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for