Esic contribution is not deducting on seperation cases in retro run.

Dear Experts,
Employee was got seperated in previous month (for example Oct) and now while executing retro run (Dec) for those employee ESIC is not contributing even though they comes in esic eligibility.
Please advise.

Yeah, IN42 to 44 are activated,
ZN42 Formation of differences, transfer of n
        WGTYP?     Query wage type
          /3EA
            ELIMI *    Elim.time period ID
            SUBWTD/AEA DT   Difference tab.
ZN43 Store the differences in DT (India)
        WGTYP?     Query wage type
          /3EA
            ELIMI *    Elim.time period ID
            ADDWTD/AEA DT   Difference tab.
            INESR /AEA DT
/AEA
ELIMI *    Elim.time period ID
ADDWTI/ZEA IT   Input table
and only /zea is reflecting in RT

Similar Messages

CPF contribution is not deducting on AWS amount for retried employee.

Hi,
Issue reported: - CPF contribution is not deducting on AWS amount for retried employee.
fyi -even though employee is separated his bonus will be paid in month of December
I have checked the AWS wage type, the culmination class 3 is checked, as it is an addition wage type. And its 0185 and 0186 is not delimited also.
How can I found out the root cause?
Regards
Thomas
Edited by: Thomas Padiyara on Dec 9, 2010 2:49 AM

Patch updates issue.

ER Contribution should not Deduct from EE SAL and not Display in Payslip.

Hi Experts,
I have Pension ER contribution Wage type:
1. That should not deduct from Employee SAL
2. Should not display in Payslip.
3. Amount store in RT.
What changes i should do in V_T512W_D table
Appreciate your early response.
Regards
Raj

Hi,
We are maintaining the EE & ER contribution.
EE is working fine with all the validation & deducting from employee every month.
When we are handling ER contribution that amount is getting deducted from EE sal.
So we want to restrict ER contribution Deducting from employee sal and not to display in Payslip.
Figuring out how can we handle this thru Processing, Cumulating or Evaluation class.
Kindly advise
Regards
Raj

Re: Pension Contribution not deducting correctly

Dear Gurus,
When an employee is hired in the mid-month, the Employee and Employer pension contribution is not getting deducted properly.
if the basic is greater than 6000 employer pension should deduct 541. it is not deducting correctly when the joining date is greater than 1st of the month.
Kindly help to sort out this issue.
Thanks
Anbu

For mid-month Hiree and Termination on Savings Plans and Pensions - there are certain SAP notes that need checked. I found one for Savings plan contribution -
0000725626 - Savings/ retirement plan not processed in first period
I have seen another note for India Benefits that may be of help to you.
SAP Note 1160806 -PF and Pension contri.for mid-month joining & termin.
Please verify that these are part of your code line. Although these may be old fixes, it is better to verify rather than assuming ECC6 has these already.
Hope this helps,
Roopa

ESI is not deducting for an employee who has joined after 23?

Dear All,
With reference to issue, ESI is not deducting for the employee who has joined on or after 23 of march month.
Ex. He has gross of 9400 and /3EA is 2729 and the value of contribution is 45. But ESI is not deducting.
But for other employee same salary and he has joined on 16 march,for him ESI is deducting.
Thanks for all,
Regards,
Sujesh R

Wrong forum.
FF

TDS not deducted at the time of making adv payment to vendor through F-48

Hi experts,
While doing entry through F-48,TDS is not deducting by system.
Please advise.
Regards,
Samaar

Hi Samar
First you have to check GL account settings for the relevant Recon account in FS00.
If its ok, You need to assign both the tax types and the relevant tax codes for the Vendor.
For the Payment category, assign only the tax type and not the tax code.
In this case you have to put tax codes manually at the time of advance payment.
Thanks
Ranjith

CASE not found while executing CASE statement on Submit Form

Hi to all APEX users and developers.
I have several APEX applications and they are all working well, but recently I got one strange exception when I try to submit page:
Session: Fetch session header information
...metadata, fetch page info
...Validate item page affinity.
...Validate hidden_protected items.
Add error onto error stack
...Error data:
......message: Error processing request.
......additional_info: ORA-06592: CASE not found while executing CASE statement
......display_location: ON_ERROR_PAGE
......is_internal_error: true
......apex_error_code: APEX.UNHANDLED_ERROR
......ora_sqlcode: -6592
......ora_sqlerrm: ORA-06592: CASE not found while executing CASE statement
.....error_backtrace: ORA-06512: at "APEX_040100.WWV_FLOW", line 9273
......component.type: APEX_APPLICATION_AUTH
......component.id: 41350431648668800
......component.name: MNRFR
...Show Error on Error Page
......Performing rollback
Processes - point: AFTER_ERROR_HEADER
Processes - point: BEFORE_ERROR_FOOTER
End Page Processinga
Page has more than 120 items (most of them are hidden), so my first thought is that page has problem with posting so many items, but APEX error message doesn't hel me at all. Any help would be very appreciated :)
Almir

Hi Almir,
actually it is the 100 page item limit. See (http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17556_01/doc/user.40/e15517/limits.htm)
I also had a look into the source code and the code at the position where the error gets raised only supports 100 page items.
Can you have a look into the generated HTML code and look if you have a page items which is mapped to p_t101 or a higher number ?
I will file a bug to show a better error message.
Regards
Patrick
My Blog: http://www.inside-oracle-apex.com
APEX Plug-Ins: http://apex.oracle.com/plugins
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/patrickwolf

Absences not deducted from Absence Quota for One Employee

Dear Friends,
I am facing an issue for one employee, when I recorded an Annual Leave absence to him, it is not updated in his Absence quotas infotype. But this is working fine for all other employees in the same employee group/subgroup grouping.
But for Sick Leave absence type, it is updating in his absence quota records...
I have checked the counting rules, deduction rules, base entitlement rules and other configuration settings.......It is fine and for other employees belonging to the same grouping, it is working fine, except this employee...
I couldn't understand what will be the reason? Can anyone shed light on this issue?
Thanks in advance,
Sai Narayana,
SAP Functional Consultant.

Hi JS,
I am checking the absence is deducted or not from his entitlement in the infotype 2006 after running the payroll for that month......
The employee has taken leave on last month and the payroll is also run for that month.......This Absence is not deducted from his quota......
I have checked for another employee in this department, no error/issue with that employee.......Only with this employee I am facing problem.....
I found -
1. The Absence Quota balance which is present in Infotype 2006 is not the same which is displayed in Remuneration Statement ( leave balance is displayed in payslip for every employee)
2. Annual leave is not deducted from the employee's entitlement where as sick leave is deducted. I have checked the deduction rule too for this grouping, it is right.No issues in that.
3. Absence Quota generation also produced different results when run time evaluation thru PT60.....which is not according to the entitlement to this employee grouping that too for this employee only.
Or Friend, can you tell me some other option, to overcome this issue.....instead of repairing this all the time.......
Thanks,
Sai

I've moved my Aperture library to another computer, and masters are referencing an old path name. How can I update these references? Reloctating masters does not work in this case :(

I've moved my Aperture library from one computer to another using Finder.
I merged the library with one which was already on the computer.
Now, the photos I imported have reference to the old path name on my old computer.
How can I update these references as "Relocate Masters" does not work in this case?

Just one suggestion to be able to reconnect all at once:
Create a smart album containing the images with missing masters:
File -> New -> Smart Album, and add a rule: File Status is "Missing" (or File Status is "offline")
Then select the images in this album and go to the File menu:
and select: File -> Locate referenced File
If you are lucky, Aperture will reconnect all at once, if you point the first image version to its counterpart.

EDI Output ZB00 not getting determined in case of Split Deliveries.

Hello All,
A very Good Morning to you,
Hope you are doing good,
We have come across one critical Issue where the EDI Output ZB00 Dispatch Advice is not getting determined in case of few Split Deliveries in PROD.
Issue : On a daily basis our Client is generating Split Delivery Process used for some specific customers only.
These specific customers we are maintaining in ZPARAMS Table. The Flow of the Process is as below.
Sales Order -->Parent Delivery ZLF--> Split Delivery ZLS--> Invoice ZF2.
First the Sales Order ZOR is created through VA01 or EDI.
This ZOR is processed via ZVL10A to create parent delivery ZLF.
Once the parent delivery ZLF is created an Outbound IDoc SHPOD gets triggered which goes to the Distribution Centre Technicolor UK to check the confirmed qty and materials that needs to be delivered.
Once the Quantity is verified and confirmed from DC an Inbound IDoc SHCON interface SAP.
This Inbound SHPCON IDoc checks the entry in ZPARAMS for that customer. If the entry is found it creates one more Split Delivery ZLS doing picking and post Goods Issue in one step. This is the point where the ZB00 output is determined automatically in ZLS Delivery and processed successfully immediately.
After that the Normal Invoice ZF2 is created.
We have given the process flow details in the attachment along with Functional Modules used by the EDI Team.
Now the Issue we are currently facing on a daily basis in PRD Out of the Total Count of ZLS Deliveries in few of ZLS Deliveries ZB00 Output is not getting determined at all which is causing a huge revenue loss. For remaining ZLS Deliveries it is getting determined correctly and processed.For Split Delivery we have only 2 Customers.
We would like to know why this is happening in case of only few ZLS Deliveries.
As a work around we have just write one program for these disputed deliveries where it will go in VL02N of these deliveries and save it without doing any changes. This will make ZB00 determined and processed immediately.
We have even check the scenario in Quality Client no Issues at all. It is getting determined and processed successfully for all the test cases we created.
Please could you help us on this so that we can fix this critical Issue.
Many Thanks,
Farhan.

if QA system works correct
you probably need to find the difference between it and PRD client.
I guess it is a huge job.
but who does if not you?
because you have a lot of custom things included coding
also request abaper.

Third-party not defined in the case of vendor with plant assignment ?

We use a Third-Party Vendor to direct-ship some products directly to our Customers.
When transfers third party order form's PR STO PO, prompts the following information
Third-party not defined in the case of vendor with plant assignment
Message no. 06769
Diagnosis
You are entering a purchase transaction involving a vendor to whom a plant has been assigned. Normally, this will involve the transfer of materials from one plant to another.
This process necessitates a delivery and a billing document in the SD system. The PO appears directly in the delivery due list of the issuing plant (vendor) and therefore does not need to be transmitted.
However, an item with the procurement form "third-party" (triangular business deal) cannot appear in the delivery due list.
Procedure
An item with the procurement form "third-party" can only be ordered from vendors without a plant assignment.
how should solve?
Many thanks, Adny.
Edited by: Andy Yao on Feb 8, 2010 3:58 AM

Hi Andy
Why u doing stock transfer order,in third party sales there is no stock transfer
Follow below procees for third party sales( Vendor ship materials directly to customer)
Create Sales order(Use item category TAS) >>> Purachase requisition(Automatically from order) >>> Purchase order >>> Vendor Invoice Verification >>> Invoice to customer
Kapil

Savings Plan Contribution is not getting processed in Payroll

Hello Friends,
We are in the process of upgrading our system from 4.0 to 4.7, After correcting the schema as per the release/OSS notes, we are getting Savings Plan Contribution as blank (Retirement Savings).
Cumulation values are coming thru right but current period contribution is missing.
Earlier we had P0169 with P61, now we do not see processing class(PCLS)61 in the PCLS list. Our earlier wage types were referring to PCLS 61, I am not sure if this is causing an issue.
Please let me know if you have any faced similar situation and have an answer.
Thanks & Best Regards
ravi

Ravi,
Appriciate if you could share the solution for your problem in savings plan contribution is not getting processed in the payroll. As I am facing the same kind od problem for my new configured benefit plan ROTH 401k plan.
Please let me know the solution.
Thanks & Regards,
Sunita

Batch quantity not deducting when FIRST date (for line item) is in future.

Hi Folks,
            My requirement is when creating sales order for batch managed materials, if i give any quantity with future date that is,
if todays date is 02.07.2010 and if i create sales order..
material    => mat1
Quantity   => 20
Date   => 12.07.2010     (this is not required delivery date,this is first delivery date in schedule line for that item)
Batch => B1
and initially if Batch B1 has quantity 100 ,after saving this sales order, the quantity must be 80.
but its not deducting, for future dates ,thats why the same batch is showing quantity 100, next time
when i m creating new sales order.where as it should show 80.
where exactly the quantity deduction is carried out (include or PAI PBO modules).
any hints.
I appreciate your response.
Thanks

Hi Folks,
            My requirement is when creating sales order for batch managed materials, if i give any quantity with future date that is,
if todays date is 02.07.2010 and if i create sales order..
material    => mat1
Quantity   => 20
Date   => 12.07.2010     (this is not required delivery date,this is first delivery date in schedule line for that item)
Batch => B1
and initially if Batch B1 has quantity 100 ,after saving this sales order, the quantity must be 80.
but its not deducting, for future dates ,thats why the same batch is showing quantity 100, next time
when i m creating new sales order.where as it should show 80.
where exactly the quantity deduction is carried out (include or PAI PBO modules).
any hints.
I appreciate your response.
Thanks

TDS not deducted at the time of Give advance to vendor -F-48

Hi gurus,
I am facing issue related to TDS deduction at the time of vendor down payment. actually at the time of invoice the tds deduction are made properly. but when i give the advance to vendor the tds is not deducted or no popup screen display at the time of vendor down payment.
i had assign the payment tax code in vendor master data. please help me to workout this issue.
warm regards,
Dhananjay R.

my self solved

TDS Not deducted at the time of Vendor out going payment (F-53)

Dear All,
First we did prepayment through F-47, iam tryin to clearing the vendor payment amount through F-53 , at this TDS amount not deducted for that payment. can any one solve this issue as soon as possible....
Thanks & Regards
Vijay Kumar

Hello vijay,
TDS should be deducted at time time of Advance Payment or Invoice Booking only, not in F-53( Payment against invoice).
if Payment is made in Advance you must have deducted tds amount. f-53 is normally using for payment against invoicing.
and invoicing is already done with deduction of tds.
Regards
Vishal Sonawane

Esic contribution is not deducting on seperation cases in retro run.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for