Creating large scale secure document repository for remote access and a few other Azure questions

Hello Microsoft Community,
Is there a way to put a bunch of documents in Azure storage and present them to an end user via an interface that is either web based or local that will provide security (log in control) to the folders and logging along with allowing access from multiple
sites? I have a large document library of medical records that have been scanned to PDF format that are historical. They moved EMR systems to a new system and the documents I'm talking about are historical access only in case a patient needs historical records
and aren't in the new system. Records staff would need to be able to log into said site, gain access to the files, search by file name and print / copy / save the PDF document so it can be sent to the patient requesting the info.

Shared access signature and stored access policy can be used in this case.
A shared access signature is a URI that grants restricted access rights to containers, blobs, queues, and tables for a specific time interval. By providing
a client with a shared access signature, you can enable them to access resources in your storage account without sharing your account key with them. A stored access policy provides an additional level of control over shared access signatures on the server
side.
For more details, please refer the following links:
Create and Use a Shared Access Signature (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/jj721951.aspx)
Use a Stored Access Policy (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/ee393341.aspx)

Similar Messages

  • Need to create a Store Business document type for material master and store a sharepoint link

    Hello,
    I need to create a Store business document type for material master and store a URL link . How do I do that?( or is there any functionality to upload a document for a  store business document that it will automatically saves to sharepoint?)
    Thanks,
    Ran.

    >
    dhayes12 wrote:
    > A)  When I do the (Material Backflush) MFBF for the 04 type, the Inspection Lot gets created OK.  I then can go into QA32 and assign the correct Inspection Plat by clicking the Inspection Lot button.
    >
    > B)  When I do the MIGO via the Purchase Order (type Z01), it will not create the Lot if I have the Multiple Specs selected in the QM Material Master MM02.  If, I turn off the Multiple Specs in the QM Material Master and create a new PO and MIGO, it will create the Lot, however, it automatically assigns the lot to the wrong Inspection Plan (2nd Plan see above)  I need to be able to select the plan like I can with the 04 type.
    >
    > Is their some setting that can be changed in Config or somewhere that acts the same way as example A above?
    For case A, create insp plan with usage "1- production" If you have one IP with this usage for given material then system will assign Plan to lot automatically. In your case for second plan update usage as 1.
    For case B, system should assign 1st plan make sure for both plan udage is correct. for 1st plan usage should be 5 while 2nd plan usage should be 1. Now if your 1st have status 4 and key date before lot date then system will assign plan auto.
    Thanks!!!

  • How to enable second HD DVR for remote access?

    I easily got my first HD DVR setup for remote access and it worked perfetly for 1 day, then it stopped working.  After 2 hours on the phone with tech support, we got it to work again.  However, we were unable to get my second DVR setup.  He said that I could only have one DVR setup for remote access, is that true?  If not, any assistance would be much appreciated. 
    Thank you!

    glcockrum wrote:
    I easily got my first HD DVR setup for remote access and it worked perfetly for 1 day, then it stopped working.  After 2 hours on the phone with tech support, we got it to work again.  However, we were unable to get my second DVR setup.  He said that I could only have one DVR setup for remote access, is that true?  If not, any assistance would be much appreciated. 
    Thank you!
    Are you speaking of Remote Access from the Web?  ...or from a mobile phone?
    For Web Access it is absolutely NOT TRUE!
    I have TWO DVRs.  I can access both remotely from the web and schedule or delete recordings.
    The tech MAY have been speaking of (or confused about) the MULTI-ROOM capability that the DVR's have.
    Only one of the DVRs can be (and is) a Home Media (or Multi-Room) DVR, and therefore can share recordings with my other NON-DVR STB and communicates with any computer on my home network for PC-based Audio, Vieo and Image files, as well as connecting to the certain Internet video streaming sites.
    The other DVR is a standalone machine is this regard, but regardless, it still has remote access to control it from the Web.
    (I do not know anything about the Remote Access from a mobile phone capability, since I do have a Verizon Wireless contract.  THAT Remote Access may indeed be limited to just a single DVR.)

  • Help networking a Security System DVR for remote viewing

    Hey,
    I am trying to network my Security System DVR for remote viewing but cannot seem to get it working. I have read some post on this site as well as many others and followed instructions to the T but to no avail.
    Here's what I've got:
    Linksys WRT54G2 V1 connected to a modem.
    My DVR has 3 settings for networking:
    -PPPOE
    -Static
    -DHCP 
    On DHCP, The DVR automatically sets these settings:
    IP Address: 192.168.1.100
    Subnet:  255.255.255.0
    Gateway: 192.168.1.1
    and then the DNS is the same as the one on the "status" area of the router settings...
    Port: 10000-10020
    I set up port forwarding for 192.168.1.100 for port 10000-10020 selecting "both"
    If I pull up the "DHCP Clients Table" it shows the above IP Address but with no name....and the MAC address is something like ee:ee:ee:d4:03:5f.
    I have tried to change the DVR to Static and do everything manually but thats not working either.
    I created a Dynamic DNS with goddns.org but the DVR seems to have its own one built in that you cannot change. (at the bottom of the network settings it says something like "URL: 123484984.goddns.org----Status:  OK."  But when I try to type that in the address bar of IE it goes no where.)
    I hope someone can tell me why its not working.... It was working when we first got everything set up...then it stopped. then I messed with it and got it working but didn't know what I did.  Now its broken again and I don't know what to do.  
    -Ian
    PS.  When I am connected to the router via LAN cable and I type the internal IP Address assigned to the DVR by the DHCP (192.168.1.100:10000) it brings up the DVR menu perfectly.  But when I try to log into it from a different location...with the external IP address...thats when I have trouble.  I do not think my external IP has changed since I got this router set up.
     Any help would be awesome. 

    Hmmm... Did that and I can't seem to get it working still. Whats weird is that as long as I am connected to the router...I can access it through the internal IP address.... (if using DHCP its 192.168.1.100:10000 and if using static its 192.168.1.99:10000)
    Those both work when set up on DHCP for the first and Static for the second.  But as soon as I type the external IP address with the port it doesn't work.  Its like there is a firewall OR the port forwarding is not working.  But everything on the port forwarding page looks good... Its enabled, set on Both, correct port range... 10000-10020...
    Any Ideas?
    -Ian 

  • How do you created object level security in BI for roles.

    How do you created object level security in BI for roles.  For example if I want users to only execute reports in BI for a particular "object" report how would I do that.
    Thanks.

    Hi Maritza,
    Can you be more specific.
    If you are looking for BI Security concept, check this presentation:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/1b439590-0201-0010-ea8e-cba686f21f06
    Regards,
    Zaheer

  • LDAP vs local login for remote access

    Hi Team,
    I am evaluating the best means for single factor authentication for remote access (client to site or SSL VPN). The options I see are creating local usernames and password or integration with Active Directory via LDAP. What are the pros and cons of these solutions.
    I feel local logins are more secure comparitavely because the user first login using local login and password and then has to use the domain credentials for accessing corporate resources. Of course, this comes at an admistrator overload and local management of user names and passwords. Do you have any opinion on this? Any acknowledgement will be highly appreciated.

    Hello Manoj,
    IMO, I would never consider the LOCAL DB as an option for a corporate deployment. It does not scale and it is not easy to manage.
    Local DB is used in case you need to manage a number of 15 users for instance, so in this case it is managable, but when it comes to a higher number it is not an option.
    Active Directory is a better solution since it is meant to handle hundred of users and allows password-management for instance. Also you can have many ASA devices, performing DB bindings and queries to check the users credentials to the AD servers, so you don't need to deal with tons of user accounts on each ASA, for instance.
    If you are looking for a more secure way to authenticate your users you can consider two-factor authentication using certificates for instance:
    AnyConnect Certificate Based Authentication.
    Why to use AD:
    Pros
    Scalable.
    Easy to manage.
    Allows password-management.
    Cons:
    Expensive (not open AD solution).
    HTH.
    Please rate helpful posts.

  • Desperate help needed to configure WVC210 for remote access?

    Hi, I'm new and desperately need some help on setting up my WVC210 for remote access.
    I manage to setup and see images from my WVC210 using my home LAN via both wired and also wireless.
    I have 2 questions:
    (a) for wireless connection, i only manage to get connection to my WVC210 if i disable the wireless security from my router. But that means i'm opening my wireless LAN to everyone. How can i still get connection to the camera if i enable the wireless security from my router. (FYI: my router is 2Wire ADSL  from Singnet Mio)
    (b) how can i get connection to my WVC210 from outside or in my office? I type in the camera Fixed IP address (displayed on the front screen) on the web browser, by it shows a error page. Is there some setting that i might need to adjust ?
    Pls kindly help me
    Thank you.

    Bernard,
    For Item (2) is there any difference between the camera built-in dyndns updater versus the software updater? I am under the impression that the software updater is easier to manage.
    The biggest difference for you is that the camera always stays at the same location, and the laptop goes with you. Every time you access the internet from a different location with the laptop the software updater is sending the new IP address to dyndns.com. This causes you to lose access to your camera because the FQDN doesn't point to your home IP address anymore. Once the dyndns credentials are in the camera (or router) there is no management needed. The device will automatically update dyndns.com with your new IP address as it changes, and you do not need to do anything.
    For Item (3), are you saying port forward 1025 is it for the 2nd camera only or for both? Or is it 2nd camera use 1025 and first camera use 8080?
    Here's an example of what I mean:
    Camera 1: 192.168.1.210 port 1024. In router, forward port 1024 to 192.168.1.210
    Local Access: http://192.168.1.210:1024
    Remote Access: http://bernards210.dyndns.org:1024 (Example)
    Camera 2: 192.168.1.211 port 1025. In router, forward port 1025 to 192.168.1.211
    Local Access: http://192.168.1.211:1025
    Remote Access: http://bernards210.dyndns.org:1025 (Example)
    Camera 3: 192.168.1.212 port 1026. In router, forward port 1026 to 192.168.1.212
    Local Access: http://192.168.1.212:1026
    Remote Access: http://bernards210.dyndns.org:1026 (Example)
    to access the 2 camera outside, do i have to have another dyndns host name or can i use the current one for both camera?
    As you can see in the above example, the dyndns name remains the same for remote access to all three cameras. The only change is the port number at the end. Your router will translate the port number to the IP address that the port is forwarded to, allowing you to select the camera that you wish to view by changing the port number in the address.
    I was actually thinking that the camera web browser can show 2 camera at the same time. Is it possible?
    No. Each browser window will display a single camera. You can however opens multiple instances of your browser to allow viewing of more than one camera simultaneously. A better solution is to install the Video Monitoring Software that is included with the camera which allows you to view multiple cameras in the same window.

  • I have a mac mini server which I want to set up for remote access from windows and mac pcs.  How do I do this.  I can access it form my home network OK

    I have a mac mini server which I want to set up for remote access from windows and mac pcs.  How do I do this.  I can access it form my home network OK

    Posted in error.

  • How to Use synchronous RFC calls during test run for remote accesses

    there is a Setting for the usage of RFC accesses from a tested system
    using eCATT.
    'X' - Use asynchronous RFC calls during test run for remote accesses
    ' ' - Use synchronous RFC calls during test run for remote accesses
    I developed an eCATT as following :
      SAPGUI ( SAPGUI_1 , Target_system_1 ).
      SAPGUI ( SAPGUI_2 , Target_system_2 ).
    My question is how to run the eCATT in a synchronous RFC calls
    PS: I do not want to change the Target_system to the same one in the
    above script of ecatt.Because I need to run it in 2 different Target
    systems sometime.
    for example, I give a Target_system_3 when run this eCATT
    I want the SAPGUI_1 and SAPGUI_2 run the Target_system_3 but not the
    Target_system_1 or Target_system_2 .
    Could you please tell me how to make it without the changes in script?
    Edited by: Weitong Liu on Mar 24, 2011 9:44 AM

    Hi Liu,
    Weitong Liu wrote:
    > ' ' - Use synchronous RFC calls during test run for remote accesses
    This is the standard option value. Asynchronous are not the standard way and used only for very special purposes.
    Weitong Liu wrote:
    > I developed an eCATT as following :
    >   SAPGUI ( SAPGUI_1 , Target_system_1 ).
    >   SAPGUI ( SAPGUI_2 , Target_system_2 ).
    > My question is how to run the eCATT in a synchronous RFC calls
    The commands will be executed in sequence. So each call will be synchronously replayed against TS1 and TS2.
    What is you issue with this standard procedure?
    Kind regards,
    Christoph

  • Different  document  numbers  for  cash  receipt  and  cash  payment

    Dear  ALL
    can  we   get  different document  numbers   for  cash  payment  and  cash  receipt
    regards
    sheena

    Dear  Jigar ,
    i am  not able  get separate  document number   for  cash  receipt and cash payment 
    though  i assigned  in fbcjc0.can  you elaborate  on what  you  have  told  .
    further  cash receipt  and cash  payment  for  gl  account s  it  is taking consecutive  numbers  only
    can  you  give  me your  gmail  id
    regards
    sree

  • Park document approach for all PO and Non u2013 PO based vendor Invvoices

    Hello Experts,
    I want to use park document approach for all PO and Non u2013 PO based vendor Invoices.SAP
    Allows park document facility for FB60 ( Non-Po Based vendor Invoice)but doesnt allow the
    Same functionality for MIRO ( Logistics Invoice Verfication).Can anyone suggest a wayout for Park
    Document functionality for MIRO
    Thanks and Regards
    Urmila

    Hi,
    Transaction MIR7 can be used to park PO-based invoice. The same can be posted through MIRO.
    Regards,

  • I use Apple Mail and dislike Outlook.  If I create a note in Apple Mail, move it to desktop for easy access and then open the note, it opens in Outlook.  How do I stop Outlook from opening?  Do I need to uninstall Outlook?  Will it disrupt other software?

    I use Apple Mail and dislike Outlook.  If I create a note in Apple Mail, move it to my desktop for easy access and then open the note, it opens in Outlook.  How do I stop Outlook from opening?  Do I need to uninstall Outlook?  Will it disrupt other software?

    Open Apple Mail, and open Preferences (under Mail in the Menu Bar).  On the General tab, check the "Default Email Reader" and set it to Mail (6.6).

  • Configure Time Capsule for remote access

    I have a second generation 2TB Time Capsule, operating on Bridge Mode, connected to an Arris Touchstone Telephony Gateway TG862. I want to configure Back to My Mac to be able to access the Time Capsule remotely.
    I've followed the basic steps and get this message from the settings in the iCloud Pane in System Preferences: Setup router for better performance. And this details: Contact your ISP for a different server address.
    I've tried Google and OpenDNS, and also disabling the Firewall in the Arris router, and still can't access the Time Capsule remotely.
    I also tried disabling NAT and seeing it up as Bridged in the router, and disabling Wireless as well, trying to configure the Time Capsule to serve NAT and DHCP to no avail.
    Any steps I'm missing or a whole different approach I should take to be able to access my Time Capsule remotely?
    Thank you in advance for any help.

    You will have to learn how to port forward in your Arris Gateway..
    Arris Touchstone Telephony Gateway TG862
    The easiest way is to simply google it.
    http://forums.comcast.com/t5/Home-Networking-Router-WiFi/Port-forwarding-in-Arri s-TG852G-CT/td-p/954929
    It certainly appears to be problematic.. which is not surprising... If you really need remote access I would request a pure modem from your ISP (Comcast??) or simply replace it with one in the list. You will need to turn off any inbuilt firewall in the router and use DMZ perhaps to the TC.
    There is a few posts on youtube which also might help you. eg
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8tKBHvCz_0
    But I am on ADSL so my setup is too unlike yours to really tell you much.
    If you want to test something.. let me recommend you load Teamviewer onto a computer in your LAN.. set the computer up to never sleep and then try and reach it using Teamviewer from WAN connection.. if that works.. let me recommend you stick to something of this type. Unless you are prepared to change modems with your ISP I doubt you will solve it.
    If teamviewer fails nothing is going to work.. you need to at least turn off the firewalls in both the computer and the router..
    If you don't want to leave a computer running 24/7 to accept incoming requests.. then use WD MyCloud or similar type NAS.. which are far better designed for remote access than Apple routers.. or use a cloud storage and keep files you might want there.

  • VRF-Aware IPSec for Remote Access

    Dear All,
    Has anyone successfully implemented VRF-Aware IPSec for Remote Access ?
    I am trying to implement this feature on a PE which has MPLS enabled
    on the Internet facing interface.
    With the config below, I am being able to establish an IPSEc tunnel but not being able to PING the VRF interface configured on the same PE.
    I will be really grateful for any comment or any pointers for what could
    be possibly wrong with the configuration below:
    aaa new-model
    aaa authentication login USER-AUTHENTICATION local
    aaa authorization network GROUP-AUTHORISATION local
    crypto keyring test-1
    crypto isakmp policy 1
    encr 3des
    authentication pre-share
    group 2
    crypto isakmp client configuration group test-1
    key test-1
    domain test.com
    pool cpe-1
    acl 101
    crypto isakmp profile test-1
    vrf test-1
    keyring test-1
    match identity group test-1
    client authentication list USER-AUTHENTICATION
    isakmp authorization list GROUP-AUTHORISATION
    client configuration address initiate
    client configuration address respond
    client configuration group test-1
    crypto map IPSEC-AWARE-VRF 2 ipsec-isakmp dynamic test-1
    ip local pool cpe-1 192.168.81.1 192.168.81.254 group test-1
    crypto dynamic-map test-1 1
    set transform-set test-1
    set isakmp-profile test-1
    reverse-route remote-peer
    Internet facing interface
    interface GigabitEthernet4/0/0
    ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.240
    ip router isis
    mpls ip
    crypto map IPSEC-AWARE-VRF
    Customer facing interface
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/0.1
    encapsulation dot1Q 100
    ip vrf forwarding test-1
    ip address 110.110.110.1 255.255.255.0
    Kind regards,
    ZH

    Million thanks for this.
    This now works after disabling CEF on the public facing interface.
    Regards,
    Zahid

  • HT5282 What security is best for my MacBookPro and iMac? I have had some company asking me to join them to 'clean' and get rid of some unused files. Is this ok, the cost if around $40. I don't mind paying but I am a bit worried they might not be approved

    Hi,
    Am new at this. What security is best for my MacBookPro and iMac? I have had some company asking me to join them to 'clean' and get rid of some unused files. Is this ok, the cost if around $40. I don't mind paying but I am a bit worried they might not be approved by Apple.

    I have had some company asking me to join them to 'clean' and get rid of some unused files.
    Does this company know you use Mac OS X? If so this is a worrysome trend.
    For a couple of years now there have been several scam artists that call you, claiming to be from 'tech support', or your ISP or even Microsoft, reporting that your machine has been idenfitied as being infected and that you need to give them access to your machine to 'clean it up'. In the process of this 'clean up' they thoroughly hose the system by trashing important files and then demand more money in 'recovery fees' to restore the system.
    I've laughed in their face whenever they've called me since they have no clue of how to compromise a Mac system, but if they've started to target Mac users then more vigilence is required.
    http://www.informationweek.com/security/management/microsoft-windows-support-cal l-scams-7-f/240005023
    Just Google 'microsoft support scam' for more reports/variations.

Maybe you are looking for