CRM Service : Changing accounting indicator during service confirmation

We are running on CRM 5.0. We have implemented CRM service. We have a need to influence accounting indicator (which is in turn sent to R3) when service confirmation is completed. We have tried different BADI's but nothing is worked so far.
Anybody has any clue regarding this?
Appreciate your help.
-Nitin

I want to change the accounting indicator field when we complete the confirmation.
I tried adding the logic in ORDER_SAVE BADI (method PREPARE). But since confirmation is already complete the logic won't change the accounting indicator at line item level.
With this BADI logic if user saves the confirmation first and then completes the confirmation then accounting indicator is changed.
But this is not acceptable for our users as they want to complete the confirmation and then save.
Second approach we tried was implementing BADI CRM_UPLOAD_CO ( Method CHARACTERISTICS_SERVICE_FILL) . We enhanced the CO Interface structure to add Z field for Accounting Indicator and transferring that Z Field into COAS-BEMOT field in R3 using R3 User exit "IAOM0001".
All the values are passing correct upto COAS-BEMOT. Still that is not reflected in Internal Order lines when we check the accounting indicator using KOB1.
Thanks
Nitin

Similar Messages

MV50AFZ1 - Change Accounting Document During PGI

Using MV50AFZ1 User - Exit ,can i change accounting document during PGI.I want to change the Business Area.
If not ,please tell me which User Exit can help me in this.
Thanx,
Viru

Hi
business add-in LE_SHP_GOODSMOVEMENT for ur requirement
Discuss with the abaper and proceed according to ur requirement and be very specific so that it should not influence the others.
This badi during processing of PGI u can change the data related to accounting document.According to ur requirement the business area can be changed during PGI.
Edited by: sameer basha on Mar 25, 2009 7:41 AM

Accounting indicator for costing in Sales Order

We need to find a trigger in the CRM sales order to define a separate costing approach, e.g. to generate an internal order in ECC. In Service, the "accounting indicator" triggers an internal order in ECC.
We need something similar for sales orders. Any experiences?

Hi Binoj,
yes the KOB1 is fine thanks for that.
How we will show the labor in WIP.
Ex: if 100 units confirmed and not completed then WIP ma will show the mat value then where we can see the wip labor portion
kindly suggest.
Thanks,

WM - Message L3 025 during TO confirmation

Hi all, during TO confirmation (with tcode LT22 using foreground mode) I receive the error L3 025 "Act.quantities and diff.quantities are not target quantities. Check entry" .
I am not changing the date quantity.
thanks
Ignazio
Message was edited by:
Ignazio Marchese

Hello Ignazio Marchese
Are you trying to change the qty during the confirmation? if yes, then the sum of Actual confirmation qty and difference qty must be the same as target TO qty.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Arif Mansuri

Accounting indicator not able to change after service order is released

Hi,
The accounting indicator cannot be changed anymore after a service order is released.
Does anyone know how to change this setting so that accounting indicator can be changed even after a service order is released?
Thanks.
Edited by: SAP INFOUSER on Oct 18, 2010 8:48 PM

Hi,
I think you haven't done RA yet?
If a sales order has something called a Results Analyis Key and has status REL the system tries to settle whats called RA (results analysis also known as WIP). In this case you have not calculated RA but has an RA key and status REL. So technically there is nothing for the system to settle. You should either calculate RA (via KKA3) which he would have to customize or remove the RA Key from the "Account Assignment" tab on the item in VA42.

Does changing the SQL Server Service Account impact FILESTREAM data?

I have a stand-alone SQL Server 2008 instance that I need to change the SQL Server service account from LocalSystem to a domain account. However, I was wondering if there was any impact on FILESTREAM enabled databases that are hosted on the SQL Server?
Specifically, has anyone ever changed the SQL Server service account when using FILESTREAM ...
Sincerely,
Sean Fitzgerald

I have a stand-alone SQL Server 2008 instance that I need to change the SQL Server service account from LocalSystem to a domain account. However, I was wondering if there was any impact on FILESTREAM enabled databases that are hosted on the SQL Server?
Specifically, has anyone ever changed the SQL Server service account when using FILESTREAM ...
Sincerely,
Sean Fitzgerald
BOL says : Only the account under which the SQL Server service account runs is granted NTFS permissions to the FILESTREAM container.So, if you start SQL Server under different account , that account wil have access to use fliestream data (read / write)
At the database level ,If a user has permission to the FILESTREAM column in a table, the user can open the associated files..
Abhay Chaudhary OCP 9i, MCTS/MCITP (SQL Server 2005, 2008, 2005 BI) ms-abhay.blogspot.com/

Change SQL Server Agent service account

How can I change the SQL Server Agent service account from NT SERVICE\SQLSERVERAGENT to a domain user? and most importantly is what permissions I have to give that domain user?
I know that when SQL Server setup, the installer gives the domain user (that we choose to run a SQL Server service) the least privileges required, but my case is that I chose NT SERVICE\SQLSERVERAGENT and
now I want to change it to domain user so I can run successfully jobs that execute something on another SQL Servers.
If I JUST change the service account in the SQL Server Agent Properties window to a normal domain user, this is not enough and non of the jobs (even that execute local jobs) will work ...
So what privileges I should give that domain user to be able to run ALL jobs successfully?

Thanks Andreas ... yes it seems that my problem is not what I was thinking.
Stan210, thank you also :) .... my connection is trusted and the following is the error I'm getting:
The job failed. Unable to determine if the owner (MYDOMAIN\JobOwnerUser) of job
MyJOB has server access (reason: Could not obtain information about Windows NT group/user 'MYDOMAIN\JobOwnerUser', error code 0x6e. [SQLSTATE 42000] (Error
15404)).
if I change the owner of the job to sa I get the follwoing error:
Executed as user: CCCAE\RASO_SSAgent. Login failed for user 'MYDOMAIN\AgentDomainUser'. [SQLSTATE 28000] (Error 18456) Cannot open database "DB_on_other_Server" requested by the login. The login
failed. [SQLSTATE 42000] (Error 4060). The step failed.
if I keep the owner of the job "sa" and add the 'MYDOMAIN\JobOwnerUser'
in 'Run as user' of the step, I get the following error:
'EXECUTE AS USER' failed for the requested user
'MYDOMAIN\JobOwnerUser' in the database 'master'. The step failed.
please note that 'MYDOMAIN\JobOwnerUser'
is a sysadmin on both SQL Servers

After sql server 2012 installation, I have changed sql server database engine service account from network service user to system user. What is disadvantages of this process?

     After
sql server 2012 installation, I   attached my production db. Because of some reasons, i
changed sql engine account from network service user to system user by means of sql server configuration manager.
     Now , there isn’t
a problem at sql server running system. But
I have doubts that
this can produce problems later. Because sql server database engine account must have privileges that listed below;
Log on as a service (SeServiceLogonRight)
Replace a process-level token (SeAssignPrimaryTokenPrivilege)
Bypass traverse checking (SeChangeNotifyPrivilege)
Adjust memory quotas for a process
(SeIncreaseQuotaPrivilege)
Permission to start SQL Writer
Permission to read the Event Log service
Permission to read the Remote Procedure Call service
While sql server installation, setup gives these
privileges to network service user automatically, but changing user by means of sql confugarition manager does not give these
privileges.
Now, system user has privileges listed below. And sql server has been running for 1,5 months without any problems.
Log on as a service (SeServiceLogonRight)
     Bypass traverse checking
(SeChangeNotifyPrivilege) (Everyone user has his privileges. So i think that system user has this privilege also)
What problems can occur because of this situation? Shall i give other privileges to system user and restart sql server or not? And how can i give these privileges to system user listed below;
Replace a process-level token (
this can be set from user rights assignments)
Adjust memory quotas for a process
(this can be set from user rights assignments)
Permission to start SQL Writer (
? - give advice )
Permission to read the Event Log service (
? - give advice )
Permission to read the Remote Procedure Call service (
? - give advice )

Our server is windows server 2008 r2 enterprise edition. I have looked the bunch of permissions in user rights menu that is in local security policy settings gui.
And i have seen those permissions below were not granted to system user;
Bypass traverse checking (SeChangeNotifyPrivilege)
Adjust memory quotas for a process
(SeIncreaseQuotaPrivilege)
So, briefly you say, don't panic ?

Change account assignment category for services with ME22N

Dear guru ,
i have created a purchase order for a position with item category D(service) and account assignment category K(cost centre). I have inserted for the accounting view the cost center.
After the saving If I a try to change the purchase order position with ME22N the system donu2019t allow to change the account assignment category (F order instead of K).
I have verified that for other positions with account assignment category K(cost centre) but for Item category blank(standard) the system allow to change the account assignment category if not exist goods receipt or invoice.
Whatu2019s the problem about services ?
Thanks

Hi,
Usually the Account assigned PO's are fixed with Account assignment, you cann't modify the account assignment once it is saved.
It depends on the IMG settings for Account assignment category.
Check the following IMG Settings
SPROMMPurchasingAccount assignment-Maintain account assignment categories
Here check for "K" --Costcentre in the detailed information if the checkbox at Acct assignment changable then only you can modify the Account assignment category modification in PO, otherwise not possible.
rgds
gsc

Unauthorised "service change" on Sub Accounts

Having had some trouble accessing BTYahoo sub accounts from abroad I am checking them from time to time. Just now I was surprised that after login I was presented with a page that read:
Service Change
Thank you for changing services.
With this service change, you will be receiving the following level of service:
PRODUCT                       LEVEL OF SERVICE
Mailbox Storage         Unlimited primary, Unlimited sub
Photo Storage         Unlimited
Number of Sub Accounts      10
and then two option buttons Cancel or Continue
Not knowing what this "service change" is I didn't wish to Continue and perhaps opt into something by default without knowing exactly what it was - fully informed consent and all that - so I hit Cancel.
Does anyone know what this "service change" is please? No Service change has been requested by the primary account holder, or by those who operate the Sub Accounts, so I am very uncomfortable that the "service" has been changed with no warning or request.

Because only the primary account holder, the adminstrator of the account, is able to make changes to the level of service it is utterly pointless to interpose a web page that says merely "Thank you for changing services" and all the rest to any of the Sub account holders, with no details as to what has happened. It's bound to cause confusion, even anxiety, distress, and could trigger calls to the helpline, Care forums etc.
I've wasted loads of time, first investigating this, contacting sub account holders to ask if they have made any changes, then posting here, all because of BTs thoughtless incompetence, and lack of grip and foresight

Service PO Account assignment Error

Hello All
We have created Service PO with 10 line items ( Cost centre K ) & Deleted all the line & again restored the same but in service line deletion indicator is still there in each line.
During removal of deletion indicator it is giving error Please specify valid account assignment, for all the line items account assignment is there & cost centre & GL account is given
Please suugest
Regards
Rajesh

Hi,
a service line can be never saved WITHOUT the account assignment details (except acc. ***. category U in in the PO item).
In case the table ESLL will have entry but the accounting tables eskl has got no entry or has entries with deletion flag, it would be an inconsistent situation.
You can set on the screen SAPLMLSK 0200 the deletion flag (ESKL-LOEKZ) for your service account assignment, but without entering a new account assignment information the system would not allow you to leave this screen. When you set the deletion flag for service line in the account assignment detail screen, you must enter right afterwards a new account assignment information in order to leave the screen without the error message 06 408.
Regards,
Edit

Issue with BDC of ME22N to change gross price of service.

Hi,
I have a requirement where I have to undelete the PO > services tab of the item details > change the gross price to the value thats calculated by the program for each of the services of the PO > set the deletion indicator to the PO.
The spec says to use a BDC of ME22N to acheive this but after creating the recording I have had several issues with some PO's that interrupt the BDC because they bejave differently from the recording I did.
On most cases when im running the BDC in foreground after changing the gross price and pressing enter I get a new windowthat appears asking for the account assingment of service, on this window the G/L account information is ussualy passed automatically then the bdc clicks back and the process continues normally. On other services after changing the gross price and pressing enter I get the account assignment of service window but the G/L information is not passed and when the bdc clicks back the G/L account information gets passed instead of going back and the BDC stops, if I manually click back again the process will continue.
With single service PO's the process is completing, this issue is happening with PO's that have multiple services.
I know ME22 should be used for BDC and not ME22N, but the functional insists to correct the issues with the BDC of ME22N. Also I atempted to use BAPI_PO_CHANGE but I dont think this bapi can not update the gross price of each of the services, it can change the net price but this is not my requirement.
Is there a bapi that can change the gross price of each of the services of the PO?
Please advice me on this.
Edited by: bodyboarder1 on Dec 2, 2010 3:33 PM

Hi
If you really need a BDC program, try to simulate ME22 instead of ME22N
Max

Verizon is charging my account for a service that was not provided.

Verizon is charging my account for a service that was not provided.
I am a LONG term Verizon customer and no one is helping.....
I work in IT, with the Network and Mobility groups, so I know what I am talking about, network access, O/S, bandwidth, etc….
I changed to a droid Bionic, from my LG (broken).   I started experiencing issues with inability to connect to a solid 4G network. The phone was not updated to Ice Cream Sandwich O/S and tried repeatedly to get update, but no go. Verizon did swap out with another bionic, but still experienced issues with inability to consistently get network access. I work in a big city, no one else was having issues at my work.
Husband left for Europe due to a family emergency mid Sept.   FIL was in hospital. I work and there is a 7 hour time difference.   We both had SKYPE on our phones. At work, I tried to contact him, using SKYPE.   SKYPE would not connect, due to the phone issue connecting to the network.   I had to call husband directly (international calls) to get updates on the condition of my ill, 96 yo FIL.
1.   This was not an issue of an app that did not function and that Verizon does not support.   I did not have access to the network, thus could not use SKYPE to make calls. This was not a choice to call international.
Verizon admitted that it was a phone issue. Since I am a long term Verizon customer and have insurance on the phone, they tried to give me yet another Bionic 9that would not work). After much discussion, they sent me a RAZR that was on the updated O/S.
Up to the 29th of Sept, I was on the Bionic and could not access SKYPE. Once I transferred over, I could use SKYPE and was not forced by Verizon to make international calls due the lack of network service that I pay for EACH MONTH.
When I received my bill for Sept, there were hundreds of dollars of additional charges.
This was due to the international calling that I was forced to use to check on status of terminally ill 96 yo FIL.
This was due to the overage of minutes that I had and was never notified of by Verizon, due to the interational calls.
I have tried to deal with Verizon on eliminating the charges. This is after having to deal with the death and funeral arrangements, service, etc of FIL. Verizon claims that I made the calls, thus I must pay.   They admitted to it being a Verizon network issue when they traded for the Razr and updated O/S, but still want me to pay hundreds of dollars in extra fees that THEY CAUSED.

szilasi wrote:
Just as a FYI.. Husband was at the hospital, not at a PC. It would be so sanitary and easy if all was scheduled properly, but guess what? Usually when someone is ill enough and has been rushed to the hospital and extended stay, you do not only contact at 6 AM in the morning.   You check on statuses, talk to doctors, etc. during the day.
I thought you said YOUR phone was the one having the problem, not his. You could have Skyped/emailed from a computer TO his phone, but you chose to call instead.
Yes, you are correct, everyone does not always think clearly when in a stressful situation such as that. Does not mean someone else should pay for YOUR actions.
Another thing I notice about your prior post is you say "Verizon claims that I made the calls, thus I must pay." but you also claim to have made the calls yourself, so it isn't necessarily that Verizon "claims" you made the calls, you DID make the calls.
Finally, I have found myself in a similar situation in the past and most likely in the near future. I also didn't(and don't) expect Verizon to pay for my phone usage during those times.

Service Accounts for Browser Services and FD Launcher (Full-text Search)

I am setting up SQL Failover Clustering (Version: 2012SP1) on Windows 2012. There are 2 options to configure the service account for Browser Services and FD Launcher :
Option 1) Using separate domain accounts, as what I have done for DB Engine and SQL Agent.
Option 2) accept the default, which is local service for
browser, and virtual account for
FD Launcher. Per documentation URL: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143504.aspx
which is the recommended one? is it option 2?
There is security note on above URL as well, but does not clearly mention that option 1 is not recommended.
Security Note: Always run SQL Server services by using the lowest possible user rights. Use a
MSA or
virtual account when possible. When MSA and virtual accounts are not possible, use a specific low-privilege user account or domain account instead of a shared account for SQL Server services. Use separate accounts for different SQL Server services. Do not
grant additional permissions to the SQL Server service account or the service groups. Permissions will be granted through group membership or granted directly to a service SID, where a service SID is supported.

Hi Luo Donghua,
In SQL Server Brower, the default logon account is NT Authority\Local service and cannot be changed during SQL Server setup.SQL Server Browser is not a clustered resource and does
not support failover from one cluster node to the other. SQL Server Browser should be installed and
turned on for each node of the cluster. SQL Server Browser should be run in the security context of a low privileged user to minimize exposure to a malicious attack.
You can change the account after the setup has been completed; For more information, see:http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh510203.aspx.
In SQL Server full text filter daemon launcher, on Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008, the FDHOST Launcher service account also defaults to LOCAL SERVICE. If you provide a domain account in which to run the FDHOST Launcher service, we highly recommend
that you use a low privilege account. On Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008R2 , we use Virtual Account or Managed Service account(MSA) in FD Launcher . We also need to note the account you used for
FD Launcher should be different from the account that you use for the SQL Server service. For more information, see:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc281953(v=sql.100).aspx
So I recommend you use the option 2 to configure the service account for Browser Services and FD Launcher.
Thanks,
Sofiya Li
Sofiya Li
TechNet Community Support

Banking Services - Delete Account

Is there a way to get rid of accounts in Banking Services Loans Management and Deposits Management?
I understand that there is no "standard" way to do it because in productive systems this would be dangerous, accounts should be closed.
This is not a productive system, but for a demo. The demo business partner should have just one account, not several that were created by accident during testing. I want them to not show up in the Total Commitment or when searching for accounts of this BP with the value help.
Is there e.g. a report or function that could be executed by someone with administrative authorizations to delete the erroneous accounts or at least hide them from Total Commitment and search?
Or can I just delete the account from a table? But this would likely leave dead things over in other tables. (There are however not transactions on this account, they are in status "not used yet").

We do have separate clients. Additionally we run the server in a virtual machine and return to a snapshot to get rid of test data. But it has happened that people unintentionally or due to misunderstanding created accounts in the master client at a time when content development took place so that returning to the VM snapshot was not possible. It will probably happen again. It would be nice to be able to delete such accidents.
We have also once done a client copy with copying only customizing and no master data. The follow-up steps to get the system working again afterwards are quite lengthy. In Banking Services the conditions are master data, so these are lost. All the end points of web services are apparently considered transactional data and need to be re-created manually. Besides Banking Services there is CRM, in which not only the conditions, but also the products are master data and need to be re-created manually (I have posted in the CRM master data forum to ask for ways to transport or copy CRM products, but there does not seem to be any standard way). CRM also loses the middleware subscriptions during this type of client copy ... they are that time-consuming to set up (not as disastrous as those web service end points), but easily overlooked. So a customizing-only client copy is definitely not something I would want to go into if it can be avoided.

CRM Service : Changing accounting indicator during service confirmation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for