Cross Company Services

Hi Friends
Plz find the details of scenario of our current project,
we have two plants which are 1000, 1010
Hide quoted text -
These two plants are having two different company codes,
Maintenance plant is subdivided by location to facilitate the maintenance jobs. The 1010 maintenance jobs are organized directly from central maintenance department 1000.
Preventive maintenance & routine maintenance for packaging machines of 1010 is carried out by 1010 (team of attendants).
Preventive maintenance & routine maintenance for bulk manufacturing of 1010 is carried out by central maintenance department 1000.
Preventive and routine maintenance of all the equipments related to HVAC & utility services attached to 1010 plant is managed by central maintenance team 1000.
Mazal will give every moth service charges to 1000 for handling rest of all maintenance activities (with out packing area).
Plz suggest me how to map this in SAP. In this mainly my problem is these two are different company codes.
And also if u have any expericnce in this first option plz send me detailed information.
Thanks & Regards,
Raj

Hi, ok17 is not for cross company,but for CO-FI real time integration.
Ex. you maintained for "RKL Actual activity allocation" Dr 123 Cr 567
Then while posting activity allocation in CO you'll get posting like Dr 123 Cr 567 (with corresponding CO objects)

Similar Messages

Cross-Company Sales and Billing doesn't call BUV transaction settings

Hello Dear Experts.
Please help me with the following issue:
1) The Company consists of Headquater and branches (one legal entity) - several Company codes are set in the system for each unit.
2) The Contract for deliverying goods/implementation services with the Customer is concluded by the Head Office. Let's assume it's Company Code One.
3) The goods is delivered by the plant, which is assigned to one of the branches, that is another Company Code in the system - CC2.
4) Our FI group customised the Transaction BUV - Clearing between company codes by the following IMG path: Financial Accounting (New)-->General Ledger Accounting (New)-->Business Transactions-->Prepare Cross-Company Code Transactions (TCode OBYA).
Note: This customising on clearing accounts work well during material transfer between Company Codes in MM and operations within Asset Management in FI-AA.
5) I've created a sales order in CC1. I've pointed that deliverying plant is from CC2. When the billing is posted the system doesn't take the customising from BUV transaction.
What do you think the problem is about?
The entry posts in FI should go as shown in the figure above.
However right now the entries as follows:
CC1: Debits 1210 (Receivabless); Credits 6010 (Revenues). just within Company Code 1.
VAT is not shown both here and in the Figure.
Thanks in advance, Please help me...
PS: I have customised Intercompany Billing through IV Billing with Internal Customer an so on, but our FI group wants to have another schema with posting as shown in the Figure above within the one step in creating the billing document.

I'm not familiar with Verizon wanting people to change their plans online. We just went in to upgrade a phone and they offered to check and see if we were elligible for a discount.
Yes, you would think she could have easily given me the credit for 6 weeks but after sitting on hold for as long as I have with this situation, when she came back and wasn't interested in checking about it, I didn't have the strength left in chasing down her supervisor to get it. Fact is, I should have never spent that much time trying to get them to correct their error. I'm very disappointed that after talking to as many Verizon employees as I did, no one could tell me what happened and how to fix it. I can not be the only person that had that kind of change with that plan.
No one has contacted me yet. I'd be surprised it they did.
Jennifer

Inter company services

Dear all,
We have two company codes.Company code -A and Company code - B
Company code A will provide service to company code B.
This process will be thru Service PO and Service entry sheet and then MIRO
Sevice tax is also applicable in both the company codes.
Now please advice how to configure this inter company transaction so that
Expenses towards services and amount payable to company code A will be booked in company code B and
Income towards services and Amount receivable from company code B will be booked in company code A
Regards,
Shivaji

Hi Harin,
Thank you for your reply.The document given by you will not meet our requirement.Let me explain in details with accounting entry for this cross company code transaction.
As mentioned Company code A will provide service to company code B.For ex.the service amount is Rs.100 and on that service tax is Rs.10.Following entry should generate in the books of both the company codes while posting cross company code document.
In Company code A -This is a income
Company code B a/c(customer)   Dr 110
Income a/c Cr                                             100
Service tax payable a/c Cr                             10
In Company code B - This is expenses
Expenses a/c Dr                               110(Including service tax)
Company code A a/c (Vendor)                              110
Regards,
Shivaji

Cross Company Sercice Order.

Hello,
We have 3 Company Codes and Each has 1 Plant.
Lets say -
Company Code - 001, 002, 003
Plant - 001, 002, 003
Profit center & Business area is also same
Each company code have only 1 Profit center and Business area
Now issue is
We have created work order in Co. Code 001
Service will be provided for all companies.
can we create service entry sheet with account assignment of COST CENTER of Company code 002.
What will be the configuration required.
Regards
Kant

The reason for error message M8396 "Deviating local currencies &&"
is explained in note 317318:
"You enter a cross-company-code invoice. Here, all involved company
codes must have the same (first) local currency."
In the MM module it is not possible to post a cross company invoice
for company codes with different local currency. As you are aware the
error message is M8396 issued.
M8 396 was introduced in the system by note 317318 to prevent posting
cross company invoices with deviating local currencies and to prevent
inconsistencies in FI from docs posted from MM. This type of complex
posting is ONLY supported in the FI module. For more information on this
error message please also review note 321790.
You will not be able to post the invoice document with the company codes

Cross-company in P/O

Hi,everyone.
I have the scenario about cross-company in P/O only. The company A buy goods/service from vendor to Company B and The currency of both are difference. When i created Purchase order , i use vendor code : X , Company code: A (local curr: USD) , POrg : A and Plant : B(belong to Company B ,local curr: EUR)
I found the message 06 166 "Please only use plants with local currency USD". How to resolve it? I have to solve it immediately. Please explain me step-by-step.
Actually, i would like to use stock transfer order process , but it doesn't be implement SD module.
Best Regard.
Autsnee.

your scenario will not work this way.
The company code at header level has not really any influence on account postings that are made for the item level
OSS note 491789
Why can I still change the company code at header level of the purchase order although follow-on documents (goods receipt, invoice receipt ...) already exist?
Answer:
In the purchase order there is a company code at header level (field EKKO-BUKRS) and a company code at item level (field EKPO-BUKRS). The company code at item level is relevant for the update of the FI and CO documents. This company code is always derived from the plant and therefore you can no longer change it.
OSS note 508370
The company code field on the header level is just used to determine the local currency and the conversion rate to the document currency.
For all other kind of check and evaluation, we use the company code on item level.
Usually the company code on header level is derived from the purchase organisation unless we deal with central purchase organisations without related company code. In this case the user has to enter a company code.
For that reason, the only check regarding the field company code on
header level is against the purchase organisation (purchase
organisation assigned to this company code.).

Cross company STO with thirt party sales

Hi,
In cross company STO while creating the delivery in vl10b I am getting the delivery created with zero quantity(with quantity 10 in the po) and a service acceptance document is created.Clarify what setting i am missing .
Also need the process flow of cross company sale with third party sales process.
Thanks

Hello
You should use transaction CO09 to check ATP situation,with checking rule B
for deliveries.
If there is enough ATP quantity a delivery can be created. Please check
using transaction CO09 with checking rule B, also please review attached
Notes 123500 and 89362.
Please also check note 848739: ATP check incorrect with delivery for
purchase order as a posssible solution.
hope this helps,
Ray

Actual Cost Component Split for cross company code transfers.

Hi,
My issue is as follows.
Production process spans across 2 company codes.
Goods are produced in production company code, transferred (via stock transport order) to marketing company code and sold to customers from marketing company code.
Stock transport order follows sales scenario i.e.. marketing company code creates purchase order for goods from production company code and production company code bills marketing for the goods.
Actual costing / Material ledger is implemented in both company codes.
We would like to roll-up (transfer) actual cost component split from production company code to marketing company (in a similar way as in product cost planning in cross-company scenario).
However, due to the fact that the transfer between the companies is in fact a "sales" the goods in marketing company code are seen as externally purchased and the only cost component we can create is based on PO conditions. But we want to get the info about production cost component split.
Once again this is for ACTUAL cost component split.
I would be grateful for any ideas.
Thanks,
Szymon

Hi Udo / Szymon.
I have a question about this issue.
In the sap help about multiple valuations / group costing:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/7e/cb848443a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
Its not clear if this can roll up the Actual CCS? or what it do? My question is because i read the documentation of bussiness function: LOG_MM_SIT,and also the book *Actual Costing with The SAP Material Ledger*
states that we can handle the rollup of actual cost component split inter-company only with this BF active.
Could you clarify about this?
thanks!!
Arturo.
Group Valuation
Goods movements between affiliated companies not involving intercompany profits are processed using the group view. This view determines the actual cost of goods manufactured for the group, and does not include any intercompany profits. You can, however, display internal profits as delta profits in the legal and/or profit center views.
When you define cost components, you can specify that internal profits between company codes and/or profit centers are shown in detail in the cost component split. You activate these delta profits for the group valuation in the attributes of the cost components.
For each cost component structure, there can only be one cost component under which the delta profit is shown. This means that neither the legal view nor the profit center view can have more than one cost component for the delta profit.
To cost multiple values, you define a costing type for each valuation approach in Customizing for Product Cost Planning. You use the costing type to specify which valuation approach you require. You define each costing type in a new costing variant and carry out a cost estimate with this costing variant.
Group Costing and Multiple Valuation Approaches
In-Depth Detail of the Value-Added Chain: Partner Cost Component Split
You can display in detail the costs of materials and services of every company department in the value-added chain for every stage of the production process. The partner can be traced for every material used. To do this, you define a partner version, which enables the value-added portions of each manufacturing level to be displayed in detail. For further information about this, see Partners and Direct Partners.
The group cost component split can be displayed according to your partner definition. You can display the cost structures of the partners hierarchically according to your requirements, such as the company code segments on the highest level and the plant or profit center segments underneath.
To display partner cost component splits, define a partner version in Customizing and enter it in the costing type.

Cross company tax transfer posting

Dear All
The following transaction is cross company related
For cocd 4100
Bank charges Export sales   Rs 1000 Dr    Tax code S1
Service tax                                   100 Dr                    S1
E.cess                                      2 Dr                    S1
H cess                                          1 Dr                     S1
Cross Co Clearing A/c                   1103 Cr
For Cocd 1000
   HDFC bank                    1103 Cr
   Cross co clearing a/c                        1103 Dr.
Our client would like to post the tax amount on co.code 1000.
I have already set the configuration for
SPRO>Financial Accounting (New)> Financial Accounting Basic Settings (New)> Tax on Sales/Purchases>Posting>Transfer Posting of Tax for Cross-Company Code Transactions
Co.cd1        Cocd2      Taxcdorgin
4100            1000            S1
Then I have run Program RFBUST10 through T/code SE38 but system showing u201CNo lsit generatedu201D
Please advice.
Regards
Avijit

Issue resolved by self !

Cross Company Shipments

Dear Transportation Gurus,
We have implemented OSS note# 699343 and we were able to create one
shipment cost document for a shipment with deliveries across company
codes. However, the shipment cost document is found to be transferring costs to one company code instead of splitting by company code.
Here is an example:
Dlv# 1234 belonged to Company Code CC01
Dlv# 4567 belonged to Company Code CC02
Shipment Document 910001 created with the above 2 deliveries
When we created Shipment Cost document for the above shipment, it
created only one Service PO & one Service GR using company code CC01.
We expected the system to create 2 service pos (one for each company
codes CC01 & CC02) and also 2 Service GRs.
We are not getting much help from BADIs - Badi_scd_acctg & Badi_scd_transfer. Any help appreciated.
Thanks & Regards

For those of you who are looking at cross company shipments:
Resolved the issue with cross company on Shipment Cost docs using user-exit EXIT_SAPLV54B_004. We are able to generate individual Service PO for each delivery on the shipment cost doc.

Cross-domain service script

I am working on a site which is utilizing some plug-ins from a another company. An item this other company is providing is a link to an XML file which is generated/updated daily. The owner of the site I am working on wants to have the information within this file visible on his home page in a side bar. If I save the XML file within his site and create the Spry data set, everything works beautifully, but if I create the data set linking to the XML file url, it doesn't work. Because this is information updated daily, I do not want to have to go into this site, save a new XML file and upload it daily. Within the Spry Framework Help in Dreamweaver, I found this:
"The URL you decide to use (whether absolute or relative) is subject to the browser’s security model, which means that you can only load data from an XML source that is on the same server domain as the HTML page you’re linking from. You can avoid this limitation by providing a cross-domain service script. For more information, consult your server administrator."
I contacted the other company about this cross-domain service script, but they didn't seem to have a solution. I have no idea where to begin or what to do to resolve this. Any suggestions are most appreciated.
Thanks,
A

crossdomain script might be wrong term for your solution here. What
you basically need a script on your server, that does request to the
crossdomain server. This script will get / read / your required xml
file and just prints its contents with the correct header. These
scripts are also known as proxy scripts. For example a script like
this: http://www.phpfour.com/blog/2008/03/cross-domain-ajax-using-php/
hopes this helps.

Cross company payment through F-53, error in Check deposit & check issue tr

Hi
I have just joined the community and ready with 3 queries.
Please.......... help me to resolve.
i) While executing the cross company payment ( company code 1300 making payment for vendor in company code 0013) using transaction code F-53, I am getting error 'vendor not defined in company code 1300'.
For F-53 screen, vendor is selected from company code 0013.
I have executed APP (F110) successfully in company code 1300 for paying the same vendor in company code 0013.
ii) For check deposit transaction, error is " entry 1300 is missing in table TO43S'. (1300 is a company code)
iii) For check issue transaction, error is "no batch input data for screen SAPMF05A'
Thanks
Rekha

1. Don't give vendor number in the main screen, give all remaining inouts and press enter, then it'll show the second screen
there you can give the company code and vendor account.
2. Cretae a tolerance group for GL accounts in OBA0.
Don't post more than one query in the same thread.
Rgds
Murali. N

Payment term is not being pickedup in cross company code transaction

Dear Friends,
In one of the cross company code transaction scenarios (MIRO), We post a invoice in HQ books to bill on outside vendor. In subsidiary books one more cross company code document will get generated automatically, as billing on HQ as a vendor. In that second document, payment term is not being pickedup.
eg., A is HQ and B is subsidiary company
I post invoice in A books as B account debit and outside vendor credit.
In B books one more entry will get generated automatically as GRIR account debit and A (defined as vendor in B books) account credit.
In B Books payment terms are maintained in vendor master record (A vendor).
But still the payment terms are not being pickedup in that document. Because of this, it is taking the document date itself as net due date.
Please suggest, how to proceed to pick some payment term in that document.
Regards
Suresh

Hi
Assign the payment terms in Purchase Organisation level in Vendor Master Record.
Regards
Shammi

Stock report for cross-company sales

Dear all,
We are using for our Saudi Arabia company the cross-company sales process with sourcing unit in another country.
There is a Legal requirement in Saudi to provide a Stock report (with "stock in", "stock out" quantities and values).
But with the cross-company sales process the stock movements are not visible in Saudi.
Any advice ? Is there a report in SAP for this legal reqirement in Saudi Arabia ?
Best regards

Hi,
Try to use t-code MB51, will give you a list with the relevant movement types!
Good luck
Tao

Missing CO Sales Order Item in 643 Cross Company Movement

Hi all,
we are working in a make-to-order scenario in which the company A/plant A sells a finished product produced by company B/plant B.
The sales order item is a cost object (account assignment category E – “Ind. cust. w. KD-CO” is set in the requirement class in use) and is derived into the Transfer Order (Account Assignment tab) from production company B/plant B to selling company A/plant A.
When we try to transfer the finished product from plant B to plant A by means of 643 movement the system provides error message KI 235 – Account xxx requires an assignment to a CO object where xxx is the Cost Of Goods Sold for company B. This is due to the fact that FI is not able to derive the sales order item as a posting cost object.
We have activated cross company CO objects by deactivating the Company Code Validation indicator (field TKA00-RKBUK) for controlling area settings.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance.
PierGiorgio

Hi Abhi,
yes it is: "E" is the entry value in the field consumption of the requirement class involved.
Thanks, PierGiorgio

Questions on Inter-company and Cross-company sales ordering process..

Hi,
I understood the delivery plant and the sales org. is not in the same company code might be the process, but i want to know some details especially in SAP system how it is realized and processed, hope could kindly help me on below questions!! thanks!!
1)what is the difference between inter-company sales and Cross-company sales??
2)What is the general document flow and config. when in below 2 cases:
Suppose the 2 company code under same sap client system, then what kinds of company code,plant config within the system for inter-compan and cross-company, and finally what kind of document flow will it be in the system.
Suppose the 2 company code is under diff sap system, then what kind of doc flow in each sap system for inter-company and cross-company sales process???
Thank you very much!!!!

Hi,
Basically there are totally Three types of scenarios
1. Intra Compnay Stock Transport Order
In this type of scenario, the stock is transfered between Two Plants which are under the same Compnay Code. The document type used here is UB. Here in this scenario the owner ship on the stock is not changed thats way there will not be any Invoice. The process as follows
a. Create Purchase Order with document type UB - ME21N
b. Create Replenishment Delivery with Document type NL - VL10B
c. Picking and PGI - VL02N
Now stock will be shown in Transit, you can check this using T.Code MB5T.
d. Do MIGO to receive the stock into ordering plant.
2. Inter Compnay Stock Transport Order
This is called as Cross Compnay STO. Here the stock is sent from one plant to another plant which are in two different Compnay codes. That means the Ownership on the stock is changed in this scenario, that way there will be Intercompnay Invoice IV is reaised. Here the stock is just moved to one plant to another plant but not to any customer.
The Process is as follows
a. Create a PO using type NB - ME21N
b. Create a Cross Compnay Replenishment delivery using type NLCC - VL10B
c. Picking and PGI in VL02N
d. Inter Compnay Invoice IV is raised by Supplying Compnay code to the Ordering Compnay Code - VF01
for this a customer created in Supplying Compnay who represents the Ordering Compnay and the invoice is raised against to that customer.
e. MIGO to receive the stock in Ordering Plant
f. MIRO to do invoice verification and do Vendor account update. This also can be done by EDI triggering, to update the Vendor Account. That means with this step, ordering compnay will update into its vendor account that he has to give certain amount to the compnay who supplied the stock.
3. Inter Compnay Customer Sales
This is similer to the 2 process, but here instead of sending to Plant we will send the stock directly to Customer of other compnay code.
The process is as follows
a. Customer raises normal sales order in another compnay code of type OR - VA01
b. But if the plant of that compnay does not have stock, then in the order the plant is changed to other compnay code plant.
c. Delivery is created in supplying Compnay against this Order - VL01
d. Picking and PGI is done - VL02N
e. But the stock is sent direclty to customer from supplying plant.
f. Ordering compnay will raise normal invoice F2 to the customer
g. Supplying Compnay will raise Intercompnay invoice IV to the Ordering Compnay.
But for all these process there are some configurations can be done, like
the material should be extended to both the plants
a customer is created in supplying plant who represents the ordering plant so that IV can be generated to that customer.
Supplying Plants should be linked to ordering Sales Org and Distribution channel. etc.
Hope this is clear.
Thanks
Praveen

Cross Company Services

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for