Cross company payment through F-53, error in Check deposit & check issue tr

Hi
I have just joined the community and ready with 3 queries.
Please.......... help me to resolve.
i) While executing the cross company payment ( company code 1300 making payment for vendor in company code 0013) using transaction code F-53, I am getting error 'vendor not defined in company code 1300'.
For F-53 screen, vendor is selected from company code 0013.
I have executed APP (F110) successfully in company code 1300 for paying the same vendor in company code 0013.
ii) For check deposit transaction, error is " entry 1300 is missing in table TO43S'. (1300 is a company code)
iii) For check issue transaction, error is "no batch input data for screen SAPMF05A'
Thanks
Rekha

1. Don't give vendor number in the main screen, give all remaining inouts and press enter, then it'll show the second screen
there you can give the company code and vendor account.
2. Cretae a tolerance group for GL accounts in OBA0.
Don't post more than one query in the same thread.
Rgds
Murali. N

Similar Messages

Cross company payment

HI Experts,
In My company Business wants the follwing secnorio, could any one can help me in this.
Under one company we have 7 co.codes (all are located in different countries), when we purchasing the goods from one vendor(xx) for all the co.codes using different purchase orders.
for example the supplier has issued invoice number 123 in the amount of 1,000,000 with the following purchase order references:
Co.Code       Amount
1000             500,000
3000     374,400
5000     125,600
Total             1,000,000
Currently, because of the system set up wherein purchase orders assigned under a specific company codes is not possible to be posted on a different company code. Hence, our processors end up posting the same invoice in 3 parts. Likewise, payment applications were done as well in 3 parts, in this example
if the abovementioned example is possible to be posted and paid via one document number (some sort of cross company posting).
All three co.codes are in different countries (Co.Code currency is differ) but using same fiscal year Variant and same chart of accounts and same controlling area. One Group currency.
Regards,
suda

you said you are having different POs to diff Comp codes and each PO has its unique reference so how is it possible that the invoice is posted in total. its not going to happen .
but on the controlling side you can post them through allocations

Cross Company Payments

Hi Guys,
I had raised vendor invoices in company code 2000 for a vendor 1001 and using F-53 I made a cross company paymetns from the company code 1000. Here is that i need to extract a paymetns in the form of a text file to a bank for the payments. Here my question is, do we need no extract the payment document related to company code 1000 or 2000 .I It is easy to fetch payments and incoice records with refer to company code 2000 but i was not able to fetch invoices with refrence to the payment document in company code 1000 . Please some one can light on this.
With Regards
Pradeep N

Hi,
First Rise an invoice through Fb60 in company code 2000 on vendor 1001 and then make a payment through f-53 here select company code 1000 and 1000 bank account while selecting open item selection select other accounts and give company code 2000 and vendor 1001 so it will make a payment.
any doubts get back me
Regards
T N R

APP Run for Cross Company payment for multiple vendors (F110)

Hi Experts,
Please help in following regards.
C.Cod, ITH and IHK,
Vendors V1, V2 , V3.
The transaction F110 should pay cros company payment, i.e; Payment is done from IHK House bank on behalf of ITH.
Please advise whether i need to develop any custom program or do i need to have any configuration settings to be done.
Please Advice.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
In T.Code: OBVU, please maintained the Company Code and Paying code relation.
Secondly, you need to customise cross company code transaction in T.Code: OBYA
If found usefull, please assign points.
Regards,
Harish

Cross company Purchase

Hi Gurus,
It there a standard way of blocking cross company purchase order with some error message ?
So far it is possible to create the purchase order, receive the purchase order and then we are blocked in the invoice, it would be nice to be blocked in the purchase order. We dont want to do the OBYA customizing.
Thanks for your help

Hi
Yes company code is at the header level but you can make a purchase order on two different plant that belongs to two different companies. I want to allow a purchase order with different plants if they belong to the same company. And i want to forbid a purchase with different plants if they belong to different companies.
I know i can ask a developper to do a check in a customer exit but i am sure (i think) that sometime when trying to do such a purchase order i had some blocking message like "Cross-company purchase order not allowed" or something like that
But i can't find a way to activate this message
Regards

FBU8 Reverse Cross Company Issue

Hello,
I have a unique situation that I can't figure out. One of our A/R clerks posted two cross company code transactions. The situation is this.
InterCo #######1
Co 8500 Doc #####899
Co 8520 Doc #####402
InterCo #######2
Co 8500 Doc #####891
Co 8520 Doc #####400
She reversed all subsequent postings so she could reverse these two intercompany documents.
Reversed Intercompany ######1 with message #####899 reversed but ######402 not reversed.
Reversed Intercompany ######2 with message #####891 reversed but ######400 not reversed.
Now, #######400 will not reverse because it has a cleared document that was cleared by ########402
#######402 will not reverse with the error that document has cleared items but there are no cleared items other then the cross company doc with should be cleared with the cross company reversal.
Please help.
Thanks
Rick

Hi,
Please check if the period in which you are trying to reverse the document is the one that has been closed.
Also check if the document was posted in other modules like SD, MM You may also check if checks have been assigned to these documents,
if yes then you must reverse them first and make them void
the check using FCH9 and then try reversing it.
Check if you have changed any field status group of any account assignment involved in documents during the time document was created and the time you tried to reverse.
Regards

Cross company code posting in assessment cycle

Friends,
I developed one assessment cycle to send from Cost center A ( company code A with USD) to Receiver cost centers B ( company code B with CAD) and Cost center C ( Company Code A and USD), When I do the assessment cycle and check the details it is showing me 100% taken out of sender and assessed to B and C. But when I check cost center report of Cost center A, the credit is not same as the debits ( i made the cycle to take out 100%). When i drilled down in the credits ( sent from assessment cost element), I see object currency to be different from transaction currency ( should be the amount that needs to be credited) even though Object and transactions currencies are in USD.
Any input on why object currency value will be different from transaction currency value even though both are in USD? Is it something because of cross company posting with different currencies? Thanks in advance

Hi,
check SAPNET note 549430 it describes the system beahivour and what you can do.
BR Christian

Different currencies in cross company code customization

how to assign to company codes with different currencies in cross company code customization ( ex : inr and usd )

Hi Manasa,
Check the tcodes OB22 and FAGL_FC_VAL for currency related issues.
Also check the folowing links for your answer.
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3312076
http://scn.sap.com/thread/1880759
Thanks,
Rutivk.

Error while processing payment through F110

Hello
I am getting the following error while processing payment through F110
> Payment method selection for items due now to the amount of EUR          287.32-
> Payment method "Q" is being checked
> Bank details are being checked
>     Customer/vendor bank details are being checked
>   System reads house banks and checks if they are allowed
> Our bank BBVA is being checked
> Bank different from the specified bank CAIXA in master record or items
>   House bank is selected ...
> No permitted payment method exists
Information re. customer 220912 / paying company code ES4 ...
... payment not possible because of reported error
I have created one payment method "Q" & in ranking order only House bank given as BBVA. I m not able to under stand where to make correction to make this resolved

Check if different House bank is assigned in Customer Master record - Co code - Payment transactions.

While running Auto payment program through F110 getting error

Dear Experts,
while running Auto payment through F110 we are getting below error
"F0417 warning: check whether a duplicate payment medium has been created".
I dont have any problem for payment summary and payment advice, issue only for payment voucher.
Would appreciate if you could provide some inputs on this.
Thanks and Regards,
N.C.Reddy

Hi,
I have done some changes configuration in Paying company codes and payment method in company code, the issue has been resolved.
Thanks and Regards,
N.C.Reddy

ERROR DURING T.CODE F-53 ( cross company transaction error)

Hello ,
I am clearing two documents , in which one is cross company code transaction and another is vendorinvoice through t.code f-53.
while saving the document I am gettting the following error.
Consolidated companies 1000 and ' ' are different
Message no. F5080
Diagnosis
The number of the affiliated company must be clear for the selected document type for all line items. In this case at least two different companies or a company in connection with a business partner who does not belong to a company are stated.
Procedure
If you selected the correct accounts, you must enter the document with a document type that allows cross-company posting. Otherwise, please correct the entered account.
kindly help me to solve this issue
thanks and Regards,
muscan

Hi,
Please check if in the control data of the vendor master "Trading Partner" is populated.
If yes, then if you remove the trading partner then you might not get this error.
If a trading partner is there, the system check the document type for Intercompany posting control and if its not there then the system gives such an error.
Changing a document type might impact all the business transactions relating to the document type that you are using.
However this might not be required in your scenario.
Thanks,
Nitish

Cross company code downpayment posting error

Hi,
When I am posting cross company code downpayment in F-48 getting below error.
"Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled".
Vendor A/c (Company A)
Bank clearing A/c(Company B) - Profit center 25000
Problem it is not deriving the profit center for Vendor reconciliation A/c. I have used document type KZ, check boxes "intercompany postings" and "trading partner" are activated in this document type.
Default profit center has made for Bank clearing A/c and Cross company code clearing A/c. Assigned Profit center 25000 for Company A also.
Kindly advice where I am wrong, which is the correct document type to post the Cross company code transactions (Down payment:F-48, charging-off GL open item to Vendor) to derive the profit center for Vendor reconciliation A/c? Or
How can I configure in New GL that the profit center should get derived from the Cross company code clearing A/c for above cross company code transactions?
Best regards
Shanid

Hi Atif,
Thanks again for your reply.
Since we have made Profit center as mandatory in New GL charactristcs this will give the priority to enter the Profit center as
Mandatory. As I mentioned earlier we required profit center in all lines.
I have tried whatever you have said, still it is not working.
It will be great if you give a solution for this.
Regards
Shanu

Cross Company STO w/billing through 3rd Company Code

We have the following situation with our Plants and Company Codes:
   1)     Company Code 1, Plant 1 (Manufacturing and Distribution), US
   2)     Company Code 2, Plant 2 (Manufacturing), Asia
   3)     Company Code 3, Plant 3 (Distribution), Europe
We are implementing functionality to move product directly from our Manufacturing Plants to our new DC. Product can be directly shipped from Plant 2 to Plant 3, but the invoice must flow through Company Code 1 due to legal reasons. This is only an invoicing requirement as they are not required to ever u201Cownu201D the stock (no transfer of ownership).
The solution being proposed right now utilizes 2 Cross-Company STOs (both with Delivery and Invoicing - NB and NLCC). This would involve creating an STO that would move product from Plant 2 to Plant 1 (invoicing between CCode2 and CCcode1), and then a 2nd STO (Cross Company) moving Product from Plant 1 to Plant 3 (invoicing between CCode1 and CCode3). However, the product would never physically arrive in Company Code 1/Plant 1. This is a "virtual" movement to meeting the invoicing requirements. I see this option as complicated logistically and probably requiring customization to keep the documents in sync and provide visibility to their relationship with each other.
I have spent a lot of time researching the forums, Wiki, etc. to see if there is an SAP Standard/Best Practice for the process of moving the Product (once produced) directly to the DC but invoicing via another (3rd) Company Code. It seems that many manufacturing companies must face this same situation. I just want to be sure forcing another complication in the Supply Chain is the best way to meet the financial requirements or if there might be a better option out there that others have implemented. Our goal is to simplify and optimize the Supply Chain, so it seems it just should be easier to meet this financial requirement than forcing Goods Movements in and out of a Plant and creating additional documents.
Does anyone have experience with this situation (Product sent directly between 2 entities, but billed through a 3rd entity) that they could comment on what is considered u201CBest Practiceu201D for this?

Hi,
I want to share one idea that during STO between company code 2&3, you need to createvendor master record in 3 company code. During creation of venor master create invoicing party (IP) as company code 1. Then invoice will be paid to company code 1.
Another solution is third party scenario. Any way this is intercompany STO, SOME WHAT RESEMBLES EXTERNAL PROCUREMENT INTERMS OF PAYMENT. Why can't you go for third party scenario. In this treat the company code 3 as customer and company code 2 as supplier of the material. Company code is the actual vendor, but orders the msterial from company code2. Company code2 directly delivers the materail to 3 and in company code 1 can do invoice. If required logical MIGO can br done. Hope it helps you. Thanking you.

While doing cross company code postings I get an error

Hi experts,
I have an issue on cross company code postings through FB60. There is a vendor account which has been extended to both company codes. The amount of invoice is Rs.10000 of which 6000 to be accounted in company code 1000 and 4000 in company code 5000. When this is done we get an error 'A unique company code has not been assigned to company number A001'.
After trying several options, I have found one solution. In the test system I Went to classify FI document types for document splitting, against document type KR transaction 0300 (Vendor invoice) was there. I changed to 0000 (unspecified posting). Once this was done, I was able to post cross company transactions without any problem.
I would like to know as to what would be the impact? Would this change create any other issue?
I request you to give your expert opinion on this.
Regards,
Ramkumar B.
Duplicate thread, therefore it will be locked, please avoid creating different threads for the same subject.
check the responses in thread While doing cross company code postings I get an error
FI Moderator

Dear,
When you are posting vendor Invoice through FB60 then system creates accounting document "KR" and when document splitting is activated in system the you have to assign Doc type KR to Transaction 0300 and 0001.
This is standard requirement. There will not be any changes by doing this.
Hope it is clear..
Br,Vivek

Version 4.6c Cross Company Code Incoming payment to lockbox.

In version 4.6c I am trying to find out the correct IMG configuration for processing incoming payments to a lockbox when multiple companies are using one company for banking. Here is what I have done so far:
Here are the company codes: 2100 has house banks and lockbox set up.
0980 does not have house bank or lockbox.
OX16 - all both company codes involved are assigned to the same Company.
OBVU - Non-bank company code 0980 has 2100 set up as Paying Company Code
OBYA - Clearing accounts have been set up between 0980-2100.
OB05 - Accounting Clerk has been set up for both company codes.
OB10 - Lockbox from 2100 has been set up for 0980. Even though 0980 does not have a House bank set up, IMG Configuration did allow the lockbox and house bank for 2100 to be saved under 0980.
OB96 - Forms to be used were linked to 0980
One issue we are having is that when we attempt to set up a Customer for 0980 a field for Lockbox is required to be entered. When the 2100 Lockbox is input, an error message pops up saying that 0980 does not have a House Bank.
Can someone please explain how to complete the configuration for this type of activity in version 4.6c? Also should we be using F-28, FB05 or some other t-code to post incoming payments.

Hello,
You can post the cross company code postings even between two controlling areas. The system does not prevent to post documents between two company codes in two controlling area. Need not necessarily they should be under one operating concern. Provided you have to make sure that you have followed the following points:
In OBY6 - To company codes must be assigned to same Company, meaning that you mus thave created a Company and that company must have been assigned to these two company codes.
OBYA - You should maintain the clearing accounts in both the company codes. Meaning that you are posting one leg in one company code and the other leg in the other company. Therefore, it is required to have the missing legs in each company code.
Company Code1 - Posting Key 40 - Clearing Account
Company Code1 - Posting Key 50 - Clearing Account
Company Code2 - Positng Key 40 - Clearing Account
Company Code2 - Posting Key 50 - Clearing Account
OB08 - In case if the two company codes have different local (company code) currencies, you may maintain the exchange rates.
You can now go to F-02 and post a cross company code transaction giving the first leg in first company code and the second leg in second company code. Missing leg in the first company code will be posted to the GL Account mentioned in OBYA and the missing leg in the second company code will be posted to the GL Account mentioned in OBYA. That means you will have four line items overall.
The system will post three document.
Document 1 in First Company Code
Document 2 in Second Company Code
and
Document3 - Cross Company Code Document.
The cross company code document consists of the first company code document number plus company code plus last two digits of the fiscal year.
Hope this must have clarified your doubts.
Please let me know in case if you need further details.
Thanks,
Ravi

Cross company payment through F-53, error in Check deposit & check issue tr

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for