CS5 Graphic card dilema

Hello,
i'm building a new PC for use of only Photoshop CS5 extended + Illustrator (OS=Windows 7 64bit).
I have chosen all the components (i5-760, 8 GB DDR3, P55 chipset etc...) except the graphic card.
Main dilema is getting over these two cards:
1. Sapphire HD 6850 1 GB
2. MSI GTX 460 Hawk 1 GB
Since ive had a lot of problems with AMD/ATI drivers on HD3850 card (BSOD with catalyst), i was thinking to "switch" over on nVidia (there's many info on the web regarding Adobe support for nVidia CUDA, OpenCL, etc...)-
The only requirements for the graphic card is: SILENCE and STABILITY (drivers).
I would like to know if there is anyone with any experience on usage of these cards (6850 or GTX 460), so the questions are:
a) Image quality on nVidia (colors etc?) + driver/openGL experience?
b) any problems with OpenGL functions on HD 6850 (basic, normal, advanced available)?
Any help and comments is appreciated.
Thank you in advance.

function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
Joprysko wrote:
The only thing i have to say about normal updates. Frequent driver updates to me does not say, Ohh they provide good support." It tells me Ohh they found lots of bugs, but thats me, I have a beta tester mind frame. 
It's not frequent, it's monthly (as in "on a plan").  Monthly driver updates don't say any such thing.  It says "ATI has a clear policy of supporting their cards with software updates after the sale", and "They have their software development act together".  A company that avoids making updates in today's environment may do so because it's expensive or risky to do so.
function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
But as we know there is no such thing as a perfect video driver set, if there was .. they would not have jobs.
You seem to be fixated on new releases being because of bugs...
Software is never "done", so it cannot be "perfect".  When new functionality is being added, new releases bring that functionality out to users of existing hardware.  Think about that for a moment...  At first blush it doesn't seem to benefit ATI sales to make it possible to play the latest game on a card someone bought a few years ago.  But think how it builds brand loyalty. I suppose I'm a poster child for that. 
-Noel

Similar Messages

  • MacBook Pro and Adobe CS5 graphics card upgrade

    I have a few questions that I can't seem to get answers to from Adobe. I have a MacBook Pro with OS X 10.5.8 with a 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 4GB DDR2 SDRam, and GeForce 8600M GT graphics card. I currently have Adobe CS3 on it, but would like to upgrade to CS5. I know that I'll need to upgrade to Snow Leopard, but I believe I'll need to upgrade my graphics card also. According to Adobe's site, the compatible cards listed are the Nvidia quadro fx ones. the one they suggest is for a macbook pro, however, and costs about $1500. I'm trying to find out if I can even upgrade the graphics card on my MacBook, and if so is there anything that costs about a tenth of that price. CS5 specs can be found here http://www.adobe.com/products/creativesuite/mastercollection/systemreqs/
    My MacBook also has the dual boot (windows and Mac). I have never booted in Windows and have a windows laptop, so I'm wondering if it would be better to get rid of that, so that CS5 would run better when installed. any ideas/suggestions?

    "... I know that I'll need to upgrade to Snow Leopard, but I believe I'll need to upgrade my graphics card also."
    Why do you have to upgrade to Snow Leopard?
    The graphics card is not upgradeable.
    I would query the forum for users of CS5 and Leopard with your hardware configuration and see if they have any problems.

  • Need THIN CS5 graphic card.

    I would like a THIN graphic card that is Premiere CS5 compatible and takes advantage of CS5 acceleration functions.  I can not use a thick graphic card because my motherboard's PCI slots are too close to the PCI Express slots.  That rules out any Quadro type cards as well as the GeForce GTX 285.  
    Motherboard:  ASUS P6X58D-E
    What do youthink about these cards?
    GT 120
    GT 8800
    Is there a solution to the problem?
    Does Quadro FX 3800 fit the bill?  It appears to have only one monitor output.  I work in dual monitor.  

    nimborde wrote:
    What is the cheapest card that will get the job done?
    Start with the list of approved and activated cards
    Cuda cards http://forums.adobe.com/message/2870496?tstart=0
    For any other cards, read about the
    nVidia Hack http://forums.adobe.com/thread/629557?tstart=0
    Good luck finding a THIN card that will work... doing CUDA/MPE requires a card that has CUDA cores, and all the cards that I've seen take 2 slots and require a lot of power from the power supply
    As far as cost for any given card... Google knows

  • Premiere CS5 - Graphics cards for GPU acceleration

    Hello everyone
    In the system requirements under "Supported NVIDIA graphics cards for GPU acceleration" are the following graphics cards listed:
         GeForce GTX285
         GeForce GTX470
    why are only these two GeForce Cards supported?
    Why are the other NVIDIA cards like
         GTX460
         GTX480
         GTX560
         GTX570
         GTX580
    not listed?
    What about support of SLI configuration?
    What is better, a 2 x GTX470 configuration or a single GTX580 ?
    Thanks for your responses in advance.
    Regards
    Urs

    The guys at Studio One did some tests and wrote this interesting article:
    http://www.studio1productions.com/Articles/PremiereCS5.htm
    It seems that the RAM speed (DDR5 v/s DDR3) is more relevant than any other factor...
    The GTX 470 has more cuda cores than a lot of the more expensive cards... go figure?!

  • After Effects CS5  Ram, Codecs and Graphic card

    hi im using AF CS5  with all latest updates. I have few questions
    i have problem with codecs included in CS5. could please someone tell me why when i try to "render  que" and i tried every possible codec included in AF cs5 the output is rubbish like hell. i been reading googling etc some on Adobe forums, some people say use 32bit instead 8bit, other say use this codec instead that one another say maybe maybe hmmm maybe .../.. let me think ahhh this codec isnt supported in AF cs5 yet it will be in next 2025 release.
    could please someone tell me what codec should i use to make output look like standard video instead crappy sh**t?
    ram preview work great no problems when i save on my desktop ram preview, it use auto  AVI WRAW (1gb/min)  and the video look great im satisfied.
    when i checked add to render que codecs under avi, wraw isnt included so i cant use it but why the hell ram preview use this codec?
    when i use quick time mpeg avi etc codecs included in cs5 the output look like i dont even know how to describe it look very bad. i tried also encode the shi**y output trough media encoder tried h264 etc tried to use other third party software to correct AF bad output and nothing helped and im tired.!!!!!
    how can Adobe sale something crapp that doesnt work ?!!!
    where is WRAW ?
    what codec should i use to make my 2 min clip look good ?
    another thing i got with AF thing called media encoder could please someone tell me why the hell i cant encode AVI movie in it ??? and then make out of it FLV or MPEG etc ?
    the result after making out of avi flv or mpeag etc  is that the sound disappear probably everyone in Adobe know it. could you please sort it out ?!!!!
    why when i use free encoding software such as mediacoder etc no problem with AVI decoding encoding etc?
    Another Question i have 4x ATI HD4850 installed so i would like to use it right ?? why? cuz everyone on earth know that normally graphic cards are designed for graphics.. not when you use Adobe products. Adobe preffer to make people buy 280gb of ram and 20 x Q9000 quad core.
    why the f***K open GL After Effects doesnt work ???? just dont ask me what opengl ver do i have !!!! when i use open gl the rendering is slower with Gpu than than using the CPU whys that? why it isnt in MAYA ??? etc
    people buy product people expect it to work right ?not install it then install all plugins you need, then try try and try to make AF work. AF remaind me Linux  still use it sometimes, when you install ubuntu you need a bit of time to make your graphic card work sound etc many of your devices wont never work cuz they arent supported no drivers or buggy drivers. the thing about linux is that it is free.
    Adobe cost money so people expect it to work i dont have time to wait or try to make it work for the next 5 years !!!!!

    If you're looking for help this is a great place to be. Just maybe dial back the "adobe sucks" rhetoric a bit. The folks here are  extremely helpful but I think they're all volunteering their time so try to keep that in mind. Nothing wrong with complaining and/or suggesting improvements. Just try to respect the process and be patient. If you ask one or two specific questions (i know you did re: sound in .avi files) you'll get help faster.
    wish I knew why OpenGL for rendering was still so bad. I was told long time ago "just don't use it for rendering" and I've followed that advice ever since. Maybe someday it'll be useful. Meanwhile it works great for everything else inside AE so I don't condemn the whole idea of OpenGL in Adobe products. Every CS release supports it more and more...they'll get there. For now just don't use it for rendering and you'll be fine.
    At least you're using CS5 and can take advantage of all your RAM. just think, a few short years ago...
    Sorry I can't help you with your missing audio in .avi. I generally render to QT or an img sequence and then layer my audio on top of that.
    If you find an answer post back - I'm sure it will help someone else.
    Good luck!
    -Richard "canoli99"

  • Problems with the graphic card and adobe photoshop cs5

    hello,
    i installed adobe photoshop cs5 for my sisters computer:
    specifications:
    Prozessor: AMD Phenom™ II X6 1090T Six-Core Prozessor(3,2GHz, 9MB Cache)
    Festplatte: 2x 1 TB SATA II
    Arbeitsspeicher: 8 GB DDR3
    Grafikkarten: VGA PCI-Express ATI Radeon™ HD5870 1GB GDDR5 (2x DVI, HDMI, DisplayPort) x 2 (2 von der sorte)
    Sound: 7.1 support
    Netzwerk: Gbit LAN
    Software: Windows® 7 Home Premium,
    Schnittstellen/Anschlüsse: Gehäuse-Front: Mic., Audio, 2xUSB 2.0, Front MCR, 1x Firewire, 1x eSATA Gehäuse-Rückseite: 8x USB 2.0, 2x USB3.0, 2x
    Firewire, 2x eSATA, 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x Gbit LAN, 2x SPDIF, 6x Audio
    Besonderheiten: 80 Watt Netzteil
    as you can see, absolute new hardware...
    now photoshop tells her that her graphic card wouldnt fit the requirements, and allways switches to "software-sides" rendering.
    this can't be true, this mashine is running hardchore grafic apps, and has the newest ATI Raedon Gra-Card (2 of them) which even now has a native support for open GL.
    the computer has all latest drivers (no newer versions available)
    so what to do?
    i can't even tell photoshop manually in the settings to enable open GL...
    i defenitally reached the end of my knowledge here.. i tried everything, also changing (as suggested by photoshop) the open GL settings of the graphic card card. no changes ...
    need help with this one..
    thank you already for your time and hopefully help
    chris congrejo

    This forum is for suite specific issues only. Please post in the Photoshop forum.
    Bob

  • Issues with CS5 Liquify in my iMac with a AMD Radeon HD 6970M 2048 MB Graphics Card

    I have been trying to get to the bottom of this issue on my own, but to no avail.  I am running Photoshop CS5.1 Extended on an iMac with an i7, 16 GB of RAM and an AMD Radeon HD 6970M 2048 MB graphic card.  I am running OSX Lion.  Speed of the computer should NOT be an issue, but my liquify tool is impossibly slow.  I have seen others having this issue, but am not finding resolutions.  I have updated all of my software (Lion, CS5) and updated my drivers.  I have uninstalled Photoshop and reinstalled it, but still, no help.
    My Liquify tool is so slow that it is impossible to use.  It does not register if I release the mouse either and I often have to click a few times to release the brush.  I have Photoshop 5.1 on a PC and the Liquify runs very smoothly.
    Has this issue been addressed?  I am wondering if it has a root in how CS5 is reacting to the graphics card?  When I called Adobe, they swore it was Apple's fault.  When I talked to Apple, they were positive the blame lay with Adobe.  I just want a fix.  (Hey, I'll take a CS6 beta if that'll fix it.  )
    Thank you,
    Rachel

    Do you have any third party plugins installed?  If so, have you tried disabling them?  (one was showng to cause a slowdown, but I don't have my office notes handy at the moment to remember which one)
    Also, there was one obscure third party utiliity program (haxie) that also caused slowdowns in Liquify. (and again, my notes are at the office, so I don't recall the name)
    And you can try the usual: trash/reset Photoshop's preferences.
    Oh, and Lion still has a bunch of video driver bugs that Apple is continuing to work on.
    Sorry I don't have more definite info right now.

  • 512 MB or 1 GB graphic card memory for PS CS5?

    To make use of acceleration by the GPU in Photoshop CS5 Extended, to what extent is the amount of graphic card memory needed influenced by the size of the image file?
    I am aware of the stated 128MB minimum, "256 MB or more" recommendation for graphic card memory. And I'm aware that certain features only become available with at least 512 MB.
    However, I'm not at all clear how this works out in practice for moderately large image files.
    A 1920 x 1200 display at 8 bits per color, 3 colors, only needs about 7 MB to display the screen, and that is independent of the size and resolution of the actual image being displayed. But considering now the image file, a square 120/220 film image scanned at 4000 dpi, 16 bits per color, will produce a file size of over 450 MB; a 4 x 5 inch color sheet film image scanned at 2400 dpi, 16 bits per color will be over 600 MB. I want capability for at least those two file sizes, and preferably greater.
    In order to make full use of GPU hardware acceleration for Photoshop CS5 Extended, does the entire image file have to fit into the graphic card memory? (If so, is that calculated at 8 bits per color (the output to the screen), or at the 16 bits per color of the image file?). If not, are there any other guidelines as to how much graphic card memory is really needed or recommended?
    Normally, I would just choose 512 MB or 1 GB, which appear to be the most common graphic card memory sizes for current consumer graphic cards. But I don't want to underspec. And I don't want to overspec either, because I need to maintain a dual boot with both 32-bit Vista and 64 bit W7, plus my BIOS doesn't appear to permit memory remapping, so graphic card memory will eat into overall DRAM space (presumably on both 32 and 64 bit Windows).
    Thanks.

    I am presently developing software using OpenGL and GPU acceleration.   I have exceeded the capacity of texture memory on purpose, and what I saw was that the card/drivers degraded the image a little (e.g., pixels were doubled vertically).  That happened only during a test when I was purposefully trying to exceed limits with more than 1 GB of texture data just to see what would happen.
    I have a 1 GB ATI 4670, and in all the time I've actually just USED it with Photoshop - other than pushing limits with my own software on purpose - I've never seen any evidence whatsoever that the GPU memory had been used up.
    From another perspective, given that a display contains only a few megapixels, and that Photoshop is substantially a 2D app, even if the display image data were to be kept in an outrageous double precision floating point format (which I don't think it is) it would be hard to imagine using up even close to a thousand megabytes, even with multiple monitors on task.  Without knowing exactly what Photoshop does under the covers it would be hard to estimate with more certainty than just a wild guess, though.
    Generally speaking, even a modest card like the one I have seems to accelerate anything Photoshop can throw at it smoothly (I don't use the 3D stuff in Photoshop, though myself as I don't have extended).  Decent 1 GB cards aren't all that much more expensive...
    -Noel

  • Does CS5 require a discrete graphics card?

    My computer has a Core 2 Duo and 3GB of memory, but only onboard graphics. The CS5 Design Premium system requirements include "qualified hardware-accelerated OpenGL graphics card, 16-bit colour, and 256MB VRAM". Does this mean I cannot run CS5? Or does it just mean that if I want the benefits of a graphics card, the card must meet those requirements?
    I expected to be able to answer this question myself with a bit of web searching, but haven't been able to! Thanks in advance.

    Thanks Bob, I'll go ahead and try it. As it happens, Photoshop is the part of the suite I anticipate using the least.
    It's a shame the literature is unclear, though — I understand "requirements" to mean exactly that: a minimal specification without which the software will refuse to install. A graphics card could be on a separate "recommended" list.

  • Need info about graphics card supported with pre pro cs5

    Hi,
    I checked one information about supported graphics card  about pre pro cs5 on aodbe.com,
    http://www.adobe.com/products/premiere/search_result.html?manuSearchVar=1&modelSearchVar=0 &supportSearchVar=0&brand=&dataFormat=&version=CS5&device=graphic&format=&buttonSubmit=
    Under SUPPORT column it is mentioned for ATI and NVIDIA "Legacy support" and "Full support".
    What is the difference in "Legacy support" and "Full support"?
    I am not able to understand
    Vinay

    Premiere will use just about any graphics card to write to the screen so you may see what you are doing
    For hardware MPE you must use a specific nVidia card... or a non-supported nVidia card with a small hack
    For a list of supported nVidia CUDA cards go to the FAQ
    http://forums.adobe.com/community/premiere/premierepro_current/cs5_faq_sheet
    For others, the nVidia Hack http://forums.adobe.com/thread/629557?tstart=0

  • Need info about nvidia graphics card supported with premiere pro cs5

    Hi
    I need information about nvidia graphics card supported with premiere pro cs5
    If I have a computer(portable) with this video card or graphics card :
    nVIDIA® GeForce™ GTX  285M with 1GB DDR3 Video Memory available in Single or Dual (SLi) Configurations
    Microsoft® DirectX® 10 Compatible
    is it going to support MPE in premiere  pro cs5?
    Regards,
    Vinay

    To be clear:
    You asked about supported cards. Here is a list of supported cards. Others on this thread are telling you how to make an unsupported card function to some degree using a method that is not advocated by Adobe.

  • Which NVIDIA graphics card for CS4 & CS5.5 Premiere?

    I just upgraded to CS5.5 Production Premium but I'm still using XP 32bit. That means I had to load the CS4 version of Premiere and After Effects. Sooner or later I'll upgrade to 64bit Win but in the mean time which graphics card will give me the best bang for the buck and still be useful for CS5.5 later? Money isn't an issue, I just don't want to pay for something and not benefit from it. What's worse is Adobe doesn't even list cards newer than the 8800 and Quadro FX for CS4! Weren't GTX cards available before CS5 came out? Do I need to update a file in CS4 apps to make them accept cards for GPU processing?
    Adobe and NVIDIA keep pushing the Quadro cards but when you look at the benchmarks it looks like the GTX cards do just as well. I will use the system for gaming sometimes so DX11 is a must. I have a watercooled i7 920 OC @ 4.0GHz and very stable, temps never go above 60C under full load. I have 6GB RAM and use a memory handler to access the RAM over what XP can use, and use it for virtual mem and caches etc. But my current graphics card is a slightly OC'd 9800GT w/512MB. My system doesn't like to scrub video that isn't rendered unless it's at lower resolutions and obviously I'd like rendering to be as fast as possible.
    Looking around I see:
    GTX560-TI @ $240
    GTX570 @ $300
    GTX480 @ $300
    GTX570 @ $300
    GTX580 @ $460
    Quadro 4000 @ $550
    Quadro 5000 @ $1200
    So what's the secret? Where's the sweet spot?
    TIA

    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
    JEShort01 wrote:
    The "secret" to MPE bliss is to get the video card AND Win7 64bit AND load your CS5.5. I really don't think that the video card would help much running CS4 on 32bit. Regarding which card, I'd say the sweet spot since you want to game and use CS5.5 would be to go with a GTX 480 with two or three fans (single fan reference design is too LOUD). Also, if you are not going to Win7 right away, delay your purchase and the next GEN of NVidia will be closer or out and you may either want one of the new smaller die-size cards or you could benefit form lower prices on what's available today.
    Jim
    So you're saying on Win32 and CS4 Pr, Ae, AME, the graphics card doesn't matter at all? That I won't see any improvement over my 512MB 9800GT?
    If I was to narrow it down even farther, the most important aspect would be in the "preview" performance. I can always render when I'm not using the system but sometimes the preview windows hang while working on a project. The problem worsens as the resolution increases or as the project gets more complicated. I had the same problem with PP1.5 which is why I decided to bite the bullet and upgrade to see if a newer version would help.
    Cooling isn't an issue as long as a water block is available for my next card. I've read the 570 & 580 may be the same reference layout and use the same coolers, I'm still looking into that. I know I can liquid cool the 480, 560TI, 580. I have no idea about the Quadro's, I've never seen a block for those.
    I'd like to go to Win64 but other software etc is keeping me from getting there soon. I'm looking into dual booting but have read about lots of problems with folder/file sharing issues when going from XP to Win7. I keep all files/projects on a seperate drive and some are shared over a network. If MS hasn't solved the sharing issues I'm forced to stick with XP. I have too many files that need read/write access and Win7 is stated to set all shares to read only. I'm still researching if it's been resolved.
    So it's important to know if anything will help CS4 because as stated above, it'll make more sence to wait for the next gen cards for use in CS5.5.
    The bottom line is, I built this system from the ground up just a few years ago before Win64 was so popular. I used the very best components (the 9800GT is actually the lowest componet I bought because gaming wasn't that important at the time). I'm running steady overclocked @ 4.0 and boot from an SSD drive. The data drives are 7200RPM and I bought the fastest RAM I could at the time. Obviously people were editing happily a few years ago on equipment inferior to mine. What's the catch? What am I missing to run smoothly on Win32? I'm assuming it's the graphics card because it's the only place I skimped. Maybe I have a software conflict keeping any version of Pr from working smoothly.
    Being 3 gens behind, and mediocre at that, I thought the card might be a good place to start.

  • GRAPHIC CARDS AND 10.6.4 PROBLEMS - MAKES CS5 CRASHING!

    Photoshop CS5 has crashed on me several times today and *my screen becoming extremely distorted and flickering very fast, locking up the Mac and not responding at all*, leaving me to reboot.
    I tried PS CS5 in 32-Bit mode, and it is still crashing.
    +That crash just started appearing with the delivery of MacOS 10.6.4+. (Acobe engineers found unknown crashes moving up the statistics and had engineers looking at them) It is related to OpenGL, and probably to a driver update delivered with 10.6.4.
    Adobe has found no problems with CS5 and this is a problem related to Apples 10.6.4
    This has been discussed with users and engineers at Adobe here: http://forums.adobe.com/message/2957823#2957823
    We are working on a very important project with one of our main clients - and really needs this resolved asap! This is not just affecting gamers but creative professionals.
    Is there any news on this issue?
    Thank you very much,
    Kim

    A business that is using the latest OS, would also be taking risks, and would have been prudent and conservative, having multiple bootable backups to work with, and realize these things happen.
    Other than a brand new Mac that doesn't work with Leopard I can see having to have 10.6.3.
    As to how long since release to move production up from CS4 to CS5? well, people really detest the IT-minded for their "test, retest, and don't deploy until the testing is done" approach.
    I assume "graphic cards" and you have a Mac Pro 2009 w/ ATI 4870 or GTX 285, but your post was scant on that, and it is really helpful to have a more complete .sig with hardware profile to see.
    There is a patch from Nvidia for GTX 285. You should be able to roll-back to 10.6.3.

  • Photoshop CS5 Qualified Graphic Cards

    Updating computers to Windows 7 64bit with a new graphics card and need to know Adobe's recommended graphic cards for Photoshop CS5. Is there any information regarding this. They have them listed for Photoshop CS4. I would like to be like a good carpenter and measure twice and only cut once.
    Thanks.

    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}DocDJ wrote:
    I'm runing WIndows 7- 64 bit and have an ATI 4850 graphics card with CS5 trial and latest updates to both ATI  driver and CS5. CS5 still says there is a GPU problem and when I look in "preferences/Performance", there is NO video card detected. Every time I re-enable the GPU, CS5 turns it back off. Anybody have any hints? The ATI 4000 series is a supported GPU.
    The 32 bit Catalyst 10.7 drivers do that to me too at the moment (I have an ATI Radeon HD 4670 card) - OpenGL cannot be enabled in Photoshop 32 bit (it reports the somewhat bogus error message "No GPU Options Available in Photoshop Standard").  Photoshop 64 bit loves the 64 bit drivers from the very same set, though.
    Clearly the ATI developers have something wrong in the latest 32 bit drivers.
    This has been a problem since 10.5 and I have reported the problem to ATI. I suggest you do so as well.  Perhaps if enough people complain they'll start testing their new driver releases with Photoshop CS5, which I don't think they're doing now.
    For what it's worth, I am discovering quirks in the OpenGL implementations of the various drivers from the various video card makers myself as I do my own OpenGL software development.  The realm of OpenGL and graphics drivers is highly complex, evolving rapidly, and more oriented to gamers than serious users with, e.g., Photoshop.
    If you're interested, I posted some info in this thread about how to override Photoshop's default startup OpenGL checking, which can allow you for test purposes to enable Photoshop's OpenGL features despite whatever's failing:
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/691857?tstart=0
    -Noel

  • Are ps cs4 or cs5 accelerates by ati graphics card gpu?

    Hi Guys,
    Recently, I have purchased notebook ASUS G73JH A1, which comes with ATI Radeon Mobility HD 5870,
    I have purchased adobe photoshop cs3 long time before, I heard from one of friends, new photoshop cs4 and cs5 accelerates by graphics card gpu, so I am planing to purchase cs4 or cs5, but is it really uses graphics card gpu, or its not correct?
    Thanks,

    Hi dec9
    I went to ati website, for the mobility drivers, it asked me to go through the notebook vendor (which is asus)...
    so from where can I get the 10.4 driver ( I can see the driver version is 8.683.0.0 and the driver date is 12/17/2009 ) ?

Maybe you are looking for