CSS3 support for older browsers

It's pretty clear now that CSS3 is a Rubicon for web browsers and that either the browser is capable of interpreting the rules or it is not. Having said that, is there a "patch" of some sort that can be painlessly added to the CSS to allow support for, say, IE8?

I'm with Mark. Build to the level of your main target audience -- not the fewer than 5% who insist on using outdated browsers.
I have experimented with PIE and other so called "workaround" scripts for IE with less than stellar results. Also , IE Filters have some nasty side effects -- like disabling clearType which makes text look really terrible. I view these "workarounds" as mainly counterproductive.
Going forward, I'm adding an IE8 End Of Life message inside a conditional comment in all my projects now. That way people know up front that their browser sucks. The ball is then in their court whether or not to do anything about it.
We still have an XP computer at home that hubby doesn't want to part with. So the only IE browsers he can use are 7 & 8. That said, his favorite browsers are the latest versions of FF and Chrome which he uses regularly on XP. Just because some people have an older operating system doesn't necessarily mean they have to use inferior browsers.
Unless it's adversely effecting your content or usability, I don't think you should do cartwheels to support the few remaining IE7 and IE8 users. It's better for everyone if we ween them off the bad browsers as soon we can.
Nancy O.

Similar Messages

HT6055 Request to Apple: restore support for older codecs

I used Quicktime extensively for my research before upgrading to Mavericks, and now that these older codecs have been removed, none of my experimental videos taken over the past 5 years will play in Quicktime. This is extremely disappointing.
I'd like to gather as much user support as possible to request that Apple restore support for these older codecs.
PLEASE RESPOND ON THIS THREAD BY ADDING YOUR REQUEST FOR APPLE TO RESTORE SUPPORT FOR OLDER CODECS.
FYI, my video files were .avi format, recorded by a Nikon D300s and a Zeiss EVO 55 scanning electron microscope.

Some things can be converted without transforming the data. I have data in Excel spreadsheets that is identical to the data in the Lotus Symphony spreadsheets in which I entered the data in 1986. Converting video does involve data transformation which is undesirable unless it comes to a point where it is unavoidable. Speaking as a research scientist, one is obligated to try to preserve original data to a reasonable extent. In this case the video is not "dead". It can still be played. It's just Apple's behavior that anything older than about 4 years is old-fashioned and to be forgotten that's mandating stepping outside Apple software to do so. Yes, it would be a good idea to convert so when future upgrades mean no old codecs will play at least the data are available to some degree. I still would not get rid of the old files since they are the original data, and if the person spends 30 seconds installing VLC player they can still view the original data for another 10 years at least (if they keep the computer that long -- my computer is 12 years old and I can still run applications on it dating from the early 1990s).
By the way, you can still buy VHS players. I agree they will not be around forever, and if it's a family video you want to play 20 years from now then you may as well convert it now, but then that's not research evidence.
Optical media are dead at Apple, but still extensively used outside Apple. I agree in 20 years it will be hard to find a DVD player but visit right now any store selling movies or music, or a public library, and optical media are still around. Apple can force the issue where their hardware is involved, especially as regards to installing Apple software, and of course by pushing online media sales (if you buy from the iTunes Store, which I don't).

Is Apple discontinuing support for older iPods in iTunes?

Is Apple discontinuing support for older iPods in iTunes 12?

Suddenly my husbands old iPod mini is not recognized despite cable changes, restart of iTunes, and computer. Can get it to recognize my classic iPod. He has not done a update of this mini in a longtime I think. I followed all the hints Apple posts to get an unrecognized device to register...this is on a Mac using Yosemite up to date on everything

Support for older Crystal Reports .rpt files in BOE XI 3.1

Does anyone know how far back you can go with Crystal Reports objects in BOE XI 3.1? In other words, what's the oldest version of Crystal .rpts that are supported in BOE XI 3.1? Can you run Crystal Reports 9 .rpt files? I'm trying to keep from having to update around 4-5 thousand older .rpts files for an upgrade to BOE XI 3.1.
If we have to do a mass upgrade to CR 2008, what's the best way to do that?
Edited by: Michael Garrett on Aug 23, 2011 4:46 PM

Hi,
from an upgrade perspective you can upgrade from CE9 to XI 3.1. Check
https://websmp105.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700001646952008E/xi3-1_bip_upgrade_en.pdf
(S-User needed)
Do you have a running CE9 installation? If yes i would recommend upgrading this to XI 3.1 as described in the Guide. Or have you these "4-5 thousand" CR9 documents local on a file location?
Regards
-Seb.

Support for older Solaris?

Hello,
Looking at the specs for the newer Sun boxes coming out, they all say that the minimum supported OS is Solaris 10.
Is it Sun's intent to discontinue the ability to run older versions (8/9) on the newer hardware?
thx!

Some of the newer Sun systems like the x64 X4100 for example have an entirely new architecture than that which the earlier versions of Solaris was developed for, If you use this link you can see the supported versions of Solaris for that system:
http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/Systems/SunFireX4100/Su nFireX4100.html
The same can be said for the T1 powered systems eg. the T2000 only supports Solaris 10 at this time:
http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/Systems/SunFireT2000/Su nFireT2000.html
Some of the more traditional SPARC based systems that have been under continuous development eg. the SF E2900 continue to support earlier versions of Solaris:
http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/Systems/E2900/E2900.htm l
Can I ask what systems you are interested in?

BAM 11G support for Mozilla Browsers

Does anybody know if and when Oracle BAM will support more browsers than MSIE?

Hi
You can use the IE plug in for Mozilla today on 11g. However, we do not certify this solution.
If browser flexibility is important , please look into the 11gR1 PS1 BAM-ADF data control functionality. You can create ADF based applications powered by BAM server. As a result, you will be able to use Mozilla and other browsers supported by Oracle ADF technology and also, get the real time automatic updates. There are samples and recordings posted on soasamples.samplecode.oracle.com on OTN.
Browser independent functionality is on our roadmap for a major release in the future.
Regards
Payal

Support for older Sony camcorder

Hello. I have iMovie '09 on my new iMac. I just acquired an older Sony DCR-VX1000 camcorder that uses Mini DV tapes. I need to invest in new batteries, a charger, a DV cable, and a repair before actually using this camcorder but I wanted to know before I did.......Will iMovie support this camcorder? Will I have any other issues? Thanks in advance for any response.

You just need to know what kind of Firewire port you have on your iMac.
Older iMacs will have Firewire 400. You need a 6 pin to 4 pin Firewire Cable to connect your camera.
If you have a newer iMac, you may have a Firewire 800 port. In this case, you need a 9 pin to 4 pin Firewire cable.
Click /About This Mac/More Info.../Firewire (under the hardware list). If it says Firewire Bus...Maximum Speed up to 800 Mb/S, that is Firewire 800. If max is 400Mb/S or so, that is FW400.

Ridiculous lack of support for older iPod accessories

After thoroughly enjoying my iPod mini through 4 years and two batteries, I decided it was time to finally upgrade to a nano. I'm starting to think that was a big mistake. Despite an amazing screen, great functionality, and excellent storage capacity, the brand may forever be tarnished now by the fact that my new iPod did not work properly with any iPod accessory I owned. Apparently, everything I owned used firewire based charging, and Apple has dropped support of this capacity. This means my neither my $200 iPod speakers nor my $200 car integration will charge my new iPod. I used to think the iPod was an icon of the industry. I used to feel confident buying accessories, knowing they would integrate seemlessly with my iPod. Now I feel like the iPod is just another scam, with Apple's only interest being to make a buck. I will definitely never purchase another iPod accessory again, and will probably not purchase or recommend an iPod to anyone unless this problem is fully resolved.

Hey Foxhound199,
The accessories that have the "Made for iPod" logo are certified by Apple and should work without any issues. http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1665
You can leave iPod related feedback about firewire charing support here: http://www.apple.com/feedback/ipodnano.html
Jason

Acrobat X support for older version plug-ins

Hi,
        We have some plug-ins, which were created for acrobat version 7, later we upgraded them to support acrobat 8, and 9 also.
         Now with the release of acrobat X, we want to support this latest version also, is it possible to support all the versions(acrobat 7 through acrobat X)?
        and if it is possible, for doing so, what additional changes required from implementation/development point fo view.
       Can anybody give elobarated details please,
waiting for reply,
thanks in advance,

Adobe no longer supports Acrobat 7 - so I can't comment on that.
However, building a plugin FOR WINDOWS - that works on Acrobat 8-X is no problem. You simply need to use the Acrobat 8 SDK and be aware that you can't use any newer APIs.
On the Mac, however, it's a problem due to changes in their architecture with 8->9. Acrobat 9 & X share the same plugins.

Support for older System (9.x)?

I have 2 older G4 Macintosh machines. They are currently running Mac OS 10.3 (I think) and can be switched to boot from Mac OS 9.x. They are older machines my children use.
Is there any problems upgrading these machines to 10.5? Will these machines still be able to run older Mac 9.x programs (mostly a few games)?

Apparently not. After I installed Leopard at least over 15 grand in software became obsolete. I wrote to the guy I respect most when it comes to Macs, David Pogue, whose review in the NYTs convinced me to shift. I asked him why the end of OS 9 wasn't mentioned.
Here's his reply, " Well, I'm a little embarrassed to admit it--but I didn't know!!
I only discovered it too late, when I actually had need to use one of those
older programs...
dp".
I knew it was going to happen sooner or later that Mac OS 9 Apps. would no longer be supported. BUT! Shouldn't Apple have said something first?

Direct x 12 support for older programs

I want to know if the new API will support, or improve in any aspect, programs that are using older API's such as Directx 9c - 11.2.
alternatively, will computers forced to use hybrid/switchable graphics be able to use the up coming API? IE AMD/Intel graphics systems.

I'd ask them over here.
http://xboxforums.create.msdn.com/forums/?GroupID=7
Regards, Dave Patrick ....
Microsoft Certified Professional
Microsoft MVP [Windows]
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.

Agenda support for older items than three months (...

Hello All,
With the previous version of PS suite I was able to have one year old appointements in my agenda, with the new ovi suite, it seems you canno't keep datas older than three months, is there a work around ?
Best regards

No answer, I'm sticking to the good old Nokia PC Suite, which by the way perfectly works with office 2010...

Support for Older SW Versions

Hi,
I would like to ask following thing about TestStand:
Does TS 3.0 save sequences in TS 1.0.1 format ?
If does how you do it and if not what you suggest for me ?
Br,
TomiMessage Edited by tkoski on 04-07-2005 10:03 PM

Hi Tomi,
You cannot directly save the TestStand 3.0 sequences to 1.0. TestStand can save formats upto two versions previous to the current version. So TestStand 3.0 will the sequence into either 2.0.1 or 2.0 version.
However if you have TestStand 2.0 on your machine, then you can open this TestStand 2.0 sequence and save it as TestStand 1.0 sequence.
I hope this helps
SijinK
National Instruments

Why won't my Edge Animate play on older browsers (IE 7 for example)?

I've created an Edge animation (marquee) banner for a site I'm working on, but when I check it on older computers (for example XP running IE7), all I see is a large white rectangle where the marquee is supposed to be. Any ideas?

Hey there,
Animate only supports Animated content in modern browsers. IE <8 doesn't have the capability to handle some of the newer HTML languages. We do have an option to display a static poster image for older browsers and you can add links to different images.
Check out the poster/downlevel options which is what users will see on browsers that don't support CSS3.
You can also use Chrome Frame as an option to display animated content on older versions of IE. You can find this in the publish settings.
Sarah

Java CAPS - Support for browsers Firefox/Mozilla

Please provide support for other browsers (Firefox,Mozilla) for installation (and usage) of Sun Java CAPS. In the Step 2 of the installation, when must supply the path to the eGate.sar, we get the following Java script error with Firefox:
Error: document.getElementById("LicenseSubmitButton") has no properties
Source File: http://localhost:12000/eManager/protected/admin/display/DisplayPage.jsp
Line: 416
Bruno Antunes,
Java Software Engineer

Also when documentation is installed in the Java CAPS repository, we can't see-it with FireFox on linux. Some ActiveX code is being called from javascript:
// Load XML
var xml = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLDOM")
....Again support for other browsers will be appreciated.
Bruno Antunes,
Java Software Engineer

CSS3 support for older browsers

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for