DA amount not appearing in infotype 008 & in Remuneration Statement

I am learning Payroll-India on IDES 6.0. I have configured Dearness Allowance using "Incremental CPI slab based Calculation" method (not yet sure how I did it! will try to figure out!). I executed the "DA Report" for a personnel number and the VDA amount is computed there (it shows Rs. 1200). After this I used the "Start Payroll" to run the payroll for the personnel number. But the VDA amount is not appearing in Infotype 0008 for the personnel number. However, the text for the VDA wage type "Variable DA") is appearing. In the remuneration statement, neither the wage type text nor the amount is appearing ( I have done the necessary configuration to include the wage type in window W1).
Please guide me on what could be going wrong.

Hi,
Now the VDA amount is appearing in infotype 0008 of the personnel number. I ran the DA batch program for the personnel number and then uploaded using sm35.
After this, I started the payroll run for this personnel number, which was successful. But in the Remuneration Statement, neither the VDA text nor the VDA amount is appearing (I have done the necessary creation & transfer of the VDA wage type in Remuneration Statement).
Please guide me.
I have a related query. For the VDA wage type, I have set INVAL B in the wage type characteristics. Is it okay? If so, how should I create the entries for VDA wage type in the screen "Maintain Valuation of Base Wage Types" & in the screen "Calculate Eligibility for RAP's"?

Similar Messages

  • Amount not appearing in the PO history of me23

    Hi,
    For one of the PO,after doing 105,when I tried see value amount in PO history tab of me23(PO screen),it is showing only 0.00.
    It is a project PO.Account assignment category 'P'. I want to know why this amount not appearing in PO history.
    Any help to solve this issue,please...
    With Regards,
    Jaheer

    Hi,
    if the accounting doc is not generated then plz check the value update of material type
    check code OMS2
    here select the material type ur using then click on Quantity/value updating
    tick for value update
    Any one of the below mentioned case is yours, then it is quite possible that amount value will not be reflecting.
    1. Does your PO contains non-valuated Materials ?
    2. check you might have created the PO for Free-of-charge Items?
    3. if it is CG PO and involves multiple account assignments, then Valuation occurs at Invoice level.

  • WHT amount not appearing in FBL1N report for Document type RE

    Dear Friends,
    While running FBL1N report for any vendor where TDS is applicable, the WHT amount is appearing for KR document type. But when it is RE document type the WHT amount is not appearing in the report. How can we resolve this? Any enhancement/any note to be applied?
    Regards,
    Ramkumar

    Hi,
    FBL1N is having the classic withholding tax field hence please don't refer the those fields.
    please don't refer those fields.
    Please review attached note 363309 for detailed explanation.
    BSEG-QBSHB is designed to fill for the classic withholding tax. And
    extended withholding tax information is stored exclusive in table
    WITH_ITEM.
    You can check in table BSEG for the fields and will find that system
    do NOT update field BSEG-QBSHB.
    In your line layout,you define a field BSEG-QBSHB. But actully the field
    of vendor/customer line item is filled with zero from FI. Thus,it shows
    zero in line item display.
    And as note 363309 says,
    "Remove the field which contains the withholding tax information
    from your display variant.
    If you want to display the withholding tax information, double-click on
    the document number and subsequently choose 'Withholding tax'."
    Regards
    Madhu M
    Edited by: M Madhu on Jan 18, 2012 9:13 AM

  • Packaging charge amount not appearing in miro

    Dear Friends,
    I am working on SAP 4.7, One material PO is made with a customized condition type Y004 (Packaging charge (%)) - 2% And freight 2%, and after GR it was found that separate line item is appearing for freight 2% as DCGR BUT same is not appearing for the case of packaging charge due to which at the time of MIRO packaging charge amount is showing as NIL in the line item whereas freight value appearing correctly. I have also checked whether the packaging charge is getting added in the total value or not and found it is nowhere added.
    Please let me know how to correct this problem

    Details maintained against condition Y004 (packaging charge)
    Cond. class   A Discount or surcharge     
    Plus/minus    A Positive
    Calculat.type A Percentage
    Cond.category B Delivery costs
    Manual entries C Manual entry has priority
    Header condition Tick yes
    Item condition   Tick yes
    Delete           Tick yes
    Amount/Percent   Tick Yes
    delete fr. DB    Do Not delete(set the deletion)
    Scale basis      C quantity scale
    Currency conv   Tick Yes
    Accruals        Tick yes
    I have checked in GR FI document also and found that all the other amount except packaging charges appearig correctly.
    Kindly help.

  • QBSHB not appearing in BSIK - TDS amount not appearing in BSIK Table.

    Hi Gurus,
    If I enter vendor invoice through FB60, QBSHB field is appearing in all relevant tables including BSIK. But when I am using MIRO, QBSHB field in BSIK (and also in other tables) is not updating. But in accounting document I can see correct amount going to the right GL account. When I am using FB60 T code the document type used is KR. When I am using MIRO document type used is RE.
    Please help me .
    Regards
    Santosh Hegde
    Cell: +91 99893 12365
    email : [email protected]

    hello,
    I think youuse Extended withholding tax. In extended withholding tax the table WITH_ITEM is the right place to look for TDS information. MIRO is a new transaction and directly updates the extended w/tax tables whereas the fi transactions update both the with_item as well as the older fields bseg-qbshb. The bseg fields for tds are valid only for classical w/tax and are not important in case of Extended withholding tax as they would not have the exact amount as extended w/tax can have more than 1 tax type per vendor line.
    Hope this clarifies your doubts.
    regards,
    pranav.

  • Discount taken amount not appeared in Cash discount taken special G/L A/c

    Hi,
    I have entered invoice amount of 25000 INR and payment terms as 0002. I have given 100 INR bank charges. For this I have created Cash discount taken and Bank charges A/c in FS00. I have entered 20000 INR as partila payment and Special G/L Key as 'D' in Vendor A/c Details. Payment term 0002 is applicable to  20000 in this case or only for 25000 INR?
    Thanks,
    BGRAJU

    Hi,
    Payment term apply to whole amount of the invoice.
    Suppose if you pay the remaining 5000 also in time according to the payment terms.
    You'll receive cash discount for total amount and not for only 20000.
    Rgds
    Murali. N

  • Excise amount not appearing in MIRO

    Hi,
    For a PO line item I have captured the excise invoice thro J1IEX and then created a GR with reference to the Excise invoice. Due to some reason I reveresed the GR without posting the excise invoice. Then again the GR was done and the Excise invoice posted.
    Now when I am trying to post the vendors invoice in MIRO, the excise amount is not getting calculated.
    In the excise invoice part II tab, the excise amount is shown as inventorised.
    Please let me know what corrective action needs to be taken so that the vendor invoice can be posted with excise amount.
    Thanks,
    SR

    Can any one please help me on this immediately ?
    Thanks

  • Buttons Add Not appear New Infotype personal profile

    Dear experts
    I have add the infotype 0022 using the steps of the following
    Adding any Info Type IN ESS in EHP5/6 through WebDynpro Configuration
    However the system not show the button of Add new register for this Infotype, only show register created
    This is my configuration:
    I have used the Use Case A6.
    Anyone know What is the cause of this?
    I had  an error similar with the buttons save and back....
    http://scn.sap.com/thread/3600246
    Thanks

    I have checked the table, but only allow the vale A6 for the Use Case
    This is my configuration:
    Regards

  • Amount for wage type "Variable DA" not apeearing in Remuneration Statement

    I am learning Payroll-India on IDES 6.0. I have configured Dearness Allowance using "Incremental CPI slab based Calculation" method (not yet fully sure how I did it! will try to figure out!). I executed the "DA Report" for a personnel number and the VDA amount is computed there (it shows Rs. 1200). After this I used the "Start Payroll" to run the payroll for the personnel number. Tthe VDA amount is appearing in Infotype 0008 for the personnel number.  In the remuneration statement, neither the wage type text nor the amount is appearing ( I have done the necessary configuration to include the wage type in window W1).
    Please guide me on what could be going wrong.

    Dear
    showing data in the window .. you must have the Line Layout on Remuration.
    In Window must fill that values:
    SRG:           Table:             ID                   Long Text                         Ptype          Ctyp                                   Splits             Dsplits
    1     RT     /552     Difference prev. Period     01               1                                 *     *              
    1     RT     0001     Basic                          01               1                           *     *      
    1     RT     0002     House Rent                          01               1                           *     *
    Regerds,
    Rizwan

  • UI not appearing when executing the process

    i have created two DCs having 1 -1 UI each .
    In first UI have some i/p fields  and want to pass them as GP parameters to second.
    both DCs are sucessfully deployed .
    but when i m executing my process...i m getting the first UI, i enter the fields but when i click proceed,
    the second UI does not appear n it directly give the statement as.."action has been completed".
    can any plz help why im facing such situation n not able to view my 2nd UI.

    hi Sakshi Mittal ;
    First check in UWL .some time action will go to UWL
    Else check in Runtime .
    if it not working fine
    Test the secound DC callable object .
    Else tell me the . i try to help u..
    Regards
    Vivekananthan.S

  • Bank Infotype Subtype Not appearing in ESS

    Hello all,  I am working with a client who allows employees to create/maintain up to 3 bank accounts.  Our PA person has set up the following:
    Infotype 0009 with Subtype 0 as the MAIN bank
    Infotype 0009 with Subtype 1 as OTHER bank (can specify % or $ amount)
    Infotype 0009 with Subtype 91 as SECONDARY bank.
    Everything appears to be set up properly in V_T7XSSPERSUBTYP as follows:
    10 ->  0009  -> 0 -> B1
    10 ->  0009  -> 1 -> B3
    10 ->  0009  -> 91 --> B3
    The PROBLEM is this:  when viewing the bank information on ESS, the SECONDARY bank does not allow the user to specify % or $ amount.  Our PA person created subtype 91 by copying subtype 1, and she sees the $ or % field in the bank end, but it is not appearing in ESS.
    Any clues?
    Thanks!
    Cassy

    The reason is prety startight forward. These fields are been enabled via web dynpro coding for subtype '1'.
    Just in if condition for subtype 1 in the web dynpro coding also include subtype 91
    by adding a or condition.. I do not remember the exact view name but it is pretty easy to find the view name and the exact place where you need to do this by looking at the De velopment compnent in NWDS
    regards
    rajk
    null

  • Tax Code and Tax Amount Fields are not appearing

    Hi to all,
    While making Downpayment Request (F-47) Tax Code and Tax Amount Fields are not appearing in the screen.
    for more clarity...
    suppose PO is 1150 include all taxes ( Amount 1000+ Tax Amount 150)
    as per agreement with vendor we need to raise DR for 1150 and based on DR we will make downpayment to vendor (F-48)
    But in F-47 screen Tax Code and Tax Amount fields are not appearing.
    Could any body help me on this??
    Thanks in Advance
    Regards,
    Schilukuri

    why you are looking for tax code field, pay gross amount as per PO, same amount will update in PO history as well as Vendor account.
    Even if you find the tax code field and check the tax code check box, system will not calculate tax  at the time of down payment or down payment request.
    Please remember that by default standard SAP provides the tax code field in f-47 or F-48.

  • Utilization amount of Higher education cess not appearing in RG23A and RG23

    Dear All
    We have done Utilization for the month of FEB-08.
    Now when it check these utilization amount in register RG23A and RG23C part II.The entries for BED and Ecess are apperaing but for HEcess are not appearing.
    PLA entries for BED,Ecess,HEcess are appearing
    The key user has used this also.
    Please guide in this matter.What settings i need to chek.
    deepti

    Hi Ramu
    My mail id id [email protected]
    Please give the inputs .This issue is urgent.
    deepti

  • TDS Amount is not appearing in TDS Certificate

    HI Sap Experts,
    J1INCERT - In TDS certificate, TDS column, amount is not appearing, but in column Total Tax deposited amount is appearing correctly.
    My client is using ECC 6.0 Version.
    Thanks in adavance .
    Regards,
    Lakshmi

    Hi Lakshmi,
    Have you got the solution?
    I have the same problem.Please let me know what needs to be done if have found the solution.
    Thanks,
    Kumar

  • Tax amount is not appearing in consumption history of earmarked fund

    Dear Experts,
    It is a requirement from my customer, the tax item be populated with the same earmarked fund, commitment item, functional area, funds center and fund of the related expense or revenue item.
    The transaction OBBH and the exit presented in attachment was used to try to achieve that requirement.
    The accounting document was correctly created with the tax item correctly populated with the earmarked fund, commitment item, functional area, funds center and fund from the related expense item.
    The funds management document was also  correctly created including the tax item with the correct commitment item, fund, funds center and functional area.
    The problem detected is related with the missing tax value in consumption history of the earmarked fund. The value of the tax item is not appearing in records of tables KBLP and FMIOI.
    Could you please help me with this problem?
    Kind Regards,
    Rui Neves

    Hi,
    Thanks for your answer.  We are reimplementing the REFX solution for a company.  The existing system is also in ECC6.  For  contracts made in existing system when periodic posting done, tax is shown against both contract and rental object.  The value of periodic posting is same for both contract and rental object.
    However, in the new implementation, tax amount is not appearing against rental rental object.  Tax amount is appearing against rental contract.  As a result, there is a difference in amount.  Is this correct as a process ?
    Regards,
    T Saravanan

Maybe you are looking for