Packaging charge amount not appearing in miro

Dear Friends,
I am working on SAP 4.7, One material PO is made with a customized condition type Y004 (Packaging charge (%)) - 2% And freight 2%, and after GR it was found that separate line item is appearing for freight 2% as DCGR BUT same is not appearing for the case of packaging charge due to which at the time of MIRO packaging charge amount is showing as NIL in the line item whereas freight value appearing correctly. I have also checked whether the packaging charge is getting added in the total value or not and found it is nowhere added.
Please let me know how to correct this problem

Details maintained against condition Y004 (packaging charge)
Cond. class   A Discount or surcharge
Plus/minus    A Positive
Calculat.type A Percentage
Cond.category B Delivery costs
Manual entries C Manual entry has priority
Header condition Tick yes
Item condition   Tick yes
Delete           Tick yes
Amount/Percent   Tick Yes
delete fr. DB    Do Not delete(set the deletion)
Scale basis      C quantity scale
Currency conv   Tick Yes
Accruals        Tick yes
I have checked in GR FI document also and found that all the other amount except packaging charges appearig correctly.
Kindly help.

Similar Messages

Excise amount not appearing in MIRO

Hi,
For a PO line item I have captured the excise invoice thro J1IEX and then created a GR with reference to the Excise invoice. Due to some reason I reveresed the GR without posting the excise invoice. Then again the GR was done and the Excise invoice posted.
Now when I am trying to post the vendors invoice in MIRO, the excise amount is not getting calculated.
In the excise invoice part II tab, the excise amount is shown as inventorised.
Please let me know what corrective action needs to be taken so that the vendor invoice can be posted with excise amount.
Thanks,
SR

Can any one please help me on this immediately ?
Thanks

Excise values not appearing in MIRO

Dear All
I have created a PO , Made GR Part 1,2 has been captured ,
Due to some reasons we cancelled the GR , then we made a new GR for that PO
Now i get in to MIRO i am not getting the Excise Conditional values , i get only my VAT values.
Kindly throw light on this
Regards
R.Rajaram

Hi,
Cancel the excise invoice which was posted at the time of previous GRN. Then again post the excise invoice with reference to new GRN Then the excise amount will appear in MIRO.
Regards,
Prashant

Amount not appearing in the PO history of me23

Hi,
For one of the PO,after doing 105,when I tried see value amount in PO history tab of me23(PO screen),it is showing only 0.00.
It is a project PO.Account assignment category 'P'. I want to know why this amount not appearing in PO history.
Any help to solve this issue,please...
With Regards,
Jaheer

Hi,
if the accounting doc is not generated then plz check the value update of material type
check code OMS2
here select the material type ur using then click on Quantity/value updating
tick for value update
Any one of the below mentioned case is yours, then it is quite possible that amount value will not be reflecting.
1. Does your PO contains non-valuated Materials ?
2. check you might have created the PO for Free-of-charge Items?
3. if it is CG PO and involves multiple account assignments, then Valuation occurs at Invoice level.

Dunning charges is not appearing

Hi,
I have copied the standard smartform F150_DUNN_SF into custom smartform.
In the output from f150 , the dunning charges is not appearing though it is configured as 5.00 for every dunning letter.
Kindly advise.
Rgds

What operating systems are you running on your Mac and iPhone? (Please always post this when you have a question.)

Migo reference document not appearing in miro for frieght conditions

Dear all,
I ahve done migo for a po and i have checked GR based invoice in PO.When i am doing MIRO i am not getting the migo reference number for frieght condition where as the migo reference number is appearing for base price.How to get that migo reference number for frieght conditions also.
thanks in advance
regards
vithal

Sometimes the the MIGO creator might have reversed the same. In such cases the reversal document may be with different number in the same series and both posted & reversed documents will not appear in MIRO. Since you might checking with posted document number, you are seeing the blank in MIRO. In such cases, just enter the PO number in MIRO, give date & reference number press Show PO structure button in the left corner. You will find the following screen
Expand the required once. The following screen appears. In this both positive & negative numbers with same reference & document type appearing are the reversed documents.
Hope this is clear

Profit Center is not appearing in MIRO

Hi,
I have raised purchase order for asset. While doing MIRO with reference to purchase order profit center is not appearing. I check MIGO document profit center is appearing in MIGO document.
I have maintained profit center in Material Master.
OKB9 setting is required for ASSET??????
Please help
Regards
Amit

Hi
We are using ECC 6 with document splitting. I have check field status for GL . Profit center is already optional field
Regards
Amit Hingne

Delivery Note not appearing in MIRO for DCGR

Hi Friends ,
I am facing a problem in MIRO . The Delivery Notes are not appearing for "Delivery Costs at GR"(DCGR) , while it comes for individual GR which u can see by Clicking the PO-History Tab . But when we check the PO-History in ME23 , there the Delivery-Notes gets reflected against DCGR .
The users are facing a problem because they are unable to determine which delivery Cost is against which GR ( as the Delivery Note doesn't appear ) .
Kindly reply as soon as possible , if any NOTES are to be applied or so .

Hi Sudha,
have you found solution for this prob? coz mine prob is about the same. but the different when they enter delivery note at material document GR at header, they put wrong number which is extra zero. i don;t know if this the factor coz invoice receipt not allowed to be process. i mean DCIR.
Regards
Aishah

WHT amount not appearing in FBL1N report for Document type RE

Dear Friends,
While running FBL1N report for any vendor where TDS is applicable, the WHT amount is appearing for KR document type. But when it is RE document type the WHT amount is not appearing in the report. How can we resolve this? Any enhancement/any note to be applied?
Regards,
Ramkumar

Hi,
FBL1N is having the classic withholding tax field hence please don't refer the those fields.
please don't refer those fields.
Please review attached note 363309 for detailed explanation.
BSEG-QBSHB is designed to fill for the classic withholding tax. And
extended withholding tax information is stored exclusive in table
WITH_ITEM.
You can check in table BSEG for the fields and will find that system
do NOT update field BSEG-QBSHB.
In your line layout,you define a field BSEG-QBSHB. But actully the field
of vendor/customer line item is filled with zero from FI. Thus,it shows
zero in line item display.
And as note 363309 says,
"Remove the field which contains the withholding tax information
from your display variant.
If you want to display the withholding tax information, double-click on
the document number and subsequently choose 'Withholding tax'."
Regards
Madhu M
Edited by: M Madhu on Jan 18, 2012 9:13 AM

Posted Excise duty not appearing in MIRO

Hello folks,
We are capturing Excise invoice in MIGO and then as per the vendors
excise invoice we change the ED in the captured excise invoice and then
post it. We have noticed that in some cases the exise duty posted in
J1IEX is not the same which is appearing in MIRO. first we assumed that
it is appearing only for the changed items, but then we found this is
only in case of some invoices and not for the all invoices of those
items.
please let me know what to do.
regards
Ashish

Why do you change excise duties while posting ? Vendor is a dealer ??

Package in Devlopment not appearing in Quality

Hi Gurus,
Here my problem is: I have Package in Development that is not appearing in quality but the objects in the package are appearing in quality and working fine.
In case of script transport from development to quality then it is throwing an error that the package doesnot exist. Please help me to sort out this problem.
Thanks,
Swaroop.

Hi kranti,
1. One way is goto se21 tcode.
2. Enter the package name
3. Save (by changing little bit the text, and then revert back after saving)
4. It will ask for new request number
(If the original request number has been released).
5. Then u can transport this request number ( which contains the package),
by asking the basis team.
regards,
amit m.

DA amount not appearing in infotype 008 & in Remuneration Statement

I am learning Payroll-India on IDES 6.0. I have configured Dearness Allowance using "Incremental CPI slab based Calculation" method (not yet sure how I did it! will try to figure out!). I executed the "DA Report" for a personnel number and the VDA amount is computed there (it shows Rs. 1200). After this I used the "Start Payroll" to run the payroll for the personnel number. But the VDA amount is not appearing in Infotype 0008 for the personnel number. However, the text for the VDA wage type "Variable DA") is appearing. In the remuneration statement, neither the wage type text nor the amount is appearing ( I have done the necessary configuration to include the wage type in window W1).
Please guide me on what could be going wrong.

Hi,
Now the VDA amount is appearing in infotype 0008 of the personnel number. I ran the DA batch program for the personnel number and then uploaded using sm35.
After this, I started the payroll run for this personnel number, which was successful. But in the Remuneration Statement, neither the VDA text nor the VDA amount is appearing (I have done the necessary creation & transfer of the VDA wage type in Remuneration Statement).
Please guide me.
I have a related query. For the VDA wage type, I have set INVAL B in the wage type characteristics. Is it okay? If so, how should I create the entries for VDA wage type in the screen "Maintain Valuation of Base Wage Types" & in the screen "Calculate Eligibility for RAP's"?

Packaging material is not appearing in the Goods receipt of STPO

Dear All,
We are currently dealing one Roll-Out project for one multinational company. In that from sales side, one of the main processes defined is u201CStock Transport Purchase Order processu201D. As a regular process, outbound delivery document also created with ref to STPO.
As per the client requirement the u201CPackaging materialu201D needs to be added as additional line item in the delivery to calculate the packaging cost. This packaging material is a "Stockable and Valuated" material. So while performing the PGI the stock will get reduced from SD side.
The problem is, using this same STPO delivery document the Goods receipt is planned to do in the another side of company code. while doing the Goods receipt system is displaying only the "Finished Product" only. The packaging material is not displaying while doing the goods receipt in the another company code.
due to this we are not able to complete our test cycle.
so we need the expert opinion to solve this issue.
if the packaging material is added as additional line item while doing Goods receipt then, the problem is solved.
Kindly suggest us...
Regards,
MANI
frWe have customized that also and now u201CPackaging materialu201D is adding as a new line item in the delivery document as a non valuated material.
But the issue is, the Billing type u201CZICu201D is not getting determined while creation of billing if u201CPackaging materialu201D is added as a new line item. If u201CPackaging materialu201D is not added as a line item then, billing type is getting determined automatically without any issue.
We have checked in LIKP table, its containing the billing type as u201CZICu2019. But if packaging material is added then, the billing type determination is not happening.
We are assuming that some customizing needs to be done from MM/SD point of view. I am seeking the experts help regarding this issue to solve the problem.
Regards,
MANI

Dear Friends,
Thanks for the Feedback.
Even though it is a associated company, in one company code the packaging material stock was reduced and packed for the STPO shipment.
After receiving the consignment, in the receiving company code they will perform the goods receipt with ref to "Outbound Delivery" document.
Since in the outbound delivery document "Packaging material" also available. So as a business strategy we are expecting the same "packaging material" also should available for goods receipt.
I hope i have explained with max of my knowledge to clear your doubt.

QBSHB not appearing in BSIK - TDS amount not appearing in BSIK Table.

Hi Gurus,
If I enter vendor invoice through FB60, QBSHB field is appearing in all relevant tables including BSIK. But when I am using MIRO, QBSHB field in BSIK (and also in other tables) is not updating. But in accounting document I can see correct amount going to the right GL account. When I am using FB60 T code the document type used is KR. When I am using MIRO document type used is RE.
Please help me .
Regards
Santosh Hegde
Cell: +91 99893 12365
email : [email protected]

hello,
I think youuse Extended withholding tax. In extended withholding tax the table WITH_ITEM is the right place to look for TDS information. MIRO is a new transaction and directly updates the extended w/tax tables whereas the fi transactions update both the with_item as well as the older fields bseg-qbshb. The bseg fields for tds are valid only for classical w/tax and are not important in case of Extended withholding tax as they would not have the exact amount as extended w/tax can have more than 1 tax type per vendor line.
Hope this clarifies your doubts.
regards,
pranav.

Excise Amount not capturing in MIRO

Hi
Excise amount is not being captured in MIRO. Case is that a GR has been reversed with 102 and then new GR was made but when user is trying to do Invoice Verification then he is not getting the MODVAT values there.
Please suggest what shall we do.
Thanks in advance
Pankaj

Hi,
Assign the excise and CENVAT accounts to GL Accounts.
Logistics - General > Tax on Goods Movements > India > Account Determination > Specify G/L Accounts
per Excise Transaction
When you come to execute the various transactions, the system determines which G/L accounts to post to by looking at the:
Excise group
Company code
Chart of accounts
Furthermore, if you want separate account determination settings within an excise group, you can also use sub transaction types.
Requirements
You have already:
Defined the G/L accounts
Defined the excise groups
Maintained the transaction accounts
Activities
For each excise group, assign the excise and CENVAT accounts to G/L accounts. For most businesses, one set of accounts will suffice for all transactions.
Check and ensure the above IMG activities.
Regards,
G Bhaskaran

Packaging charge amount not appearing in miro

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for