Database column comments in Discoverer report

Hello,
I am trying to display database column comments in Discoverer reports. Is there any easy way to display these comments, other than copy and paste?
I am referring about comments from user_col_comments view...
SELECT column_name, comments
FROM user_col_comments
Thanks in advance...

Hi
If you create table or view comments in the database and point a Discoverer folder directly at the database object Discoverer will read the comments in and store them in the description property. If you have added the comments after the EUL was built, refreshing the folder(s) should be all you need to do.
Best wishes
Michael

Similar Messages

Setting up no of columns in R12 discoverer report

Hi,
We are working on R12 discoverer report.
In the instance when we run the report, by default we see 6 columns and we have to click on link 'Right' to see ther columns.
A logged in user can set the no of columns to 25 or so but this ihas to be done everytime for every user
How can we set the no of columns in the report to say 25 at once? Is this a set up option in the instance or in
BI 10-g Disco admin edition?
Thanks,
Gowtam.

Hi,
You can try changing the ColsPerPage in the Pref.txt on the Apps server and then running ApplyPreferences.sh. See the documentation (http://download.oracle.com/docs/html/B13918_03/prefs.htm#i1008666) for details.
Rod West

Reasons for Introducing database functions for Discoverer Reporting Needs

Hi All,
I would like to know the criteria other organizations have used in creating custom database functions specifically for Discoverer reporting needs. It seems good and appropriate to identify these reasons in order that they have a sufficiently good reason (e.g. in presenting this to a change management board).
Here is a quick swipe:
-query explain plan improvements
-take away the complexity of having the end user deal with complex calculations
-consistency of a value (e.g. a complex amortization calculation)
-an attribute is used from a dependent table with a minimum cardinality of zero
Can anyone list other good reasons in terms of Discoverer reporting?
Thanks,
Patrick
Edited by: Patrick Bacon on Jul 15, 2009 10:30 AM

Hi Patrick
In addition to the reasons you have given the reasons for having functions anyway apply just as equally to Discoverer as they do to other applications.
Typically the main reasons why I would use a function are:
a) due to the complexity of the code, or
b) to evaluate something which an end user either could not do or does not have access to.
For example if a user needs to have aggregations from multiple tables side by side in a report, typically from tables which have no joins between them, I write functions to go get the individual results.
One specific function that I use a lot is one that calculates the number of working days between any given two days. Some of my HR customers use such a function to calculate the number of sick days for an employee when obviously only working days should count. Doing this in a normal Discoverer calculation would be very hard. Retail customers might use this for calculating the number of days it took to ship and item.
There are other reasons why I use functions but these are the typical ones.
Best wishes
Michael

Capture DB Table and column comments when creating new Business Area/Folder

Does anyone know if it is possible to pull the DB table and column comments into Discoverer when creating new Business Area/Folders? Our developers take the time to put the information in the Db data dictionary and we would like to leverage it (reduce need for manually adding descriptions) ... has anyone done this?
If there isn't a way to automatically do it, would there be any harm in using a sql script to populate the description fields from the DB data dictionary directly into the EUL tables appropriate?
I have been searching through documentation and forums for information - with no luck at this point.
Thanks!

Hi Seymour
You can add column comments to views as well, as this example will show:
CREATE OR REPLACE FORCE VIEW MY_SEQUENCE
(SEQ_ID, SEQ_NAME, SEQ_NEXTVAL)
AS
SELECT "SEQ_ID","SEQ_NAME","SEQ_NEXTVAL" FROM EUL5_SEQUENCES;
COMMENT ON COLUMN MY_SEQUENCE.SEQ_NAME IS 'The sequence';
So you could add the comments at the view level and then refresh Discoverer.
Best wishes
Michael

Discoverer reports shows 'NULL' in columns where is no data

Hi All,
Discoverer report is showing NULL in columns where is no data.
please advise ASAP.
E-biz: 12.0.6
Database: 11.2.0.2
Discoverer: 10.1.2.55.26
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Kumar

In Discoverer BI DEsktop By default, it uses “NULL” text, but we can show Zero or blank then that report is executed as text report.
how can we set it as for all reports as default blank or zero.Have you reviewed the docs referenced above?
Please see these docs.
Discoverer 10.1.2/11g Worksheets Do Not Display Expected Null Format Setting After Modifying Tools Options [ID 311841.1]
Workbooks Show Wrong Null Format in Viewer/Plus After New Install or Upgrade from 4i to 10.1.2 [ID 352194.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

Discoverer report does not sum up the column

Hi All,
I am running the discoverer report from discoverer desktop and was
trying to use the sum function to sum the total amount of the report.
The sum function does not work and it only display Cell
Sum: (blank) with no actual data.
When i checked the report details some columns are calculated based on the columns which i want to sum up.
Any ideas please share with me
Thanks in advance.

b) What is the difference between sum and cell sum? Well, I certainly won't claim to be a Discoverer guru. From what little I have seen, the practical result is not any difference really between the two. SUM of a calculated row is adding up the calculation to the total. Whereas cell sum is like adding up the individual values behind the calculation you see. The distinction makes more sense when you have SUM DISTINCT and CELL SUM DISTINCT being involved. Then you will see a difference in the calculated total. But for SUM and CELL SUM itself, I have not seen any difference between the two, but I am still pretty new to Discoverer.
e) Aggregate field from a folder. Well, this may be one where you have to play around with your own data to understand. Let me try to give you a simple example. Let's say you have a sales table with 100 rows. You have sales data for 5 cities, and each city has 20 rows of sales history. If you pick Sales Dollars Detail and City Name for your workbook and run, you will get 100 rows in your result (complete detail listing). So that is what happens with no aggregation. Now, instead of doing Sales Dollars Detail, you pick Sales Dollars Sum (the same thing as saying SUM(Sales Dollars) in an SQL statement). Run the workbook. You will now get 5 rows of data, instead of 100 rows of data. You will get one row for each city. If you look at the SQL that Discoverer generates, you will see that it has now done a GROUP BY in the SQL statement. Notice I have not said anything about DISTINCT (just trying to keep things simple).
Now, lets say you do a workbook for City, Part Number, and Sales Dollars Sum. Run the workbook. You get a summarized result (say maybe 10 rows of summary data this time). If you look at the Discoverer SQL, the GROUP BY is now by city and part number, automatically doing that because you picked the SUM version of sales dollars.
Now lets say you add Sales Units Detail to the workbook. Discoverer will give you a warning message that you are have both an aggregate and a non-aggregate and that you may end up with unpredictable results. Run the workbook. You will be back to 100 rows, because you specified sales units in detail.
Most of the time I do not want to see detail rows in a workbook. So most of the time I am picking the SUM aggregate for an amount item.
Hope this explains things a bit. Sounds like maybe you need to take the Discoverer Create Queries and Reports class. Would help you understand these things better. Good luck.
John Dickey

Database migrated from Oracle 10g to 11g Discoverer report performance issu

Hi All,
We are now getting issue in Discoverer Report performance as the report is keep on running when database got upgrade from 10g to 11g.
In database 10g the report is working fine but the same report is not working fine in 11g.
The query i have changed as I have passed the date format TO_CHAR("DD-MON-YYYY" and removed the NVL & TRUNC function from the existing query.
The report is now working fine in Database 11g backhand but when I am using the same query in Discoverer it is not working and report is keep on running.
Please advise.
Regards,

Pl post exact OS, database and Discoverer versions. After the upgrade, have statistics been updated ? Have you traced the Discoverer query to determine where the performance issue is ?
How To Find Oracle Discoverer Diagnostic and Tracing Guides [ID 290658.1]
How To Enable SQL Tracing For Discoverer Sessions [ID 133055.1]
Discoverer 11g: Performance degradation after Upgrade to Database 11g [ID 1514929.1]
HTH
Srini

How to access a non-database column in a report?

Hi all,
I would like to populate a column in my report, which is not based (in Oracle Forms, it is a "non-database item").
But I don't know how to access it. Let's say the alias of the column is "column", I tried to do it with #column#, but it's not valid.
Does anyone know a solution here?
Thanks a lot,
Dovik

Dovik
Where do you need to access the column value ? Are other columns of the report accessible from where you are trying to access the value of this 'non database' column ?
varad

Discoverer Reporting Solution for Multiple Databases

I have to build oracle discoverer reports (single point of access) for four different applications. Each application is having separate databases. So whether i should create separate EULs for each applications (in respective databases) or Should i create a single EUL in any one of the databases and then use db links to connect rermaining databases (for reports from the other applications).
Can u suggest me which method will work good if you see the performace?. I need a dingle point of access for all the discoverer reports.
The worksheets need to be deployed with oracle portal for access of reports in a single click. Is there any way to pre configure the db credentila for each worksheet...?

Hi
My replies below make the assumption that you are not allowed to do any ETL and therefore the data from each database has to be pulled as is. If you do have ETL capability the situation changes dramatically.
In addition to what Sharon has said the cost based optimiizer will have a difficult job rewriting your query efficiently if you use database links, and if you attempt to have queries with some tables from one database and some from another the optimizer will not work at all. I mean. How could it? How could the optimzier in database A know anything about the statistics in databases B, C or D? Wherever the EUL is, that is where the driving optimizer will be so choose wisely obi-wan :-)
For me it's more about user needs than IT needs. If the business has a need to combine data from multiple databases then having a single EUL with database links would be a necessity. However, if they really are disparate systems with nothing in common such as say having Peoplesoft HR in one and E-Busines Suite Inventory in another with perhaps an in-house tracking system in another then I would look at having separate EULs, one in each.
Having one EUL across non-related systems means you have to mix users and roles and can be hard to manage. It actually becomes messy when just two databases are involved never mind four. So even though you might think it is more difficult to maintain 4 EULs, if the objects really are different and you have differing roles and usernames it actually will probably be simpler. They will be simpler to backup, simpler for exporting and importing and it will be faster for Discoverer to maintain workbooks as there will be fewer of them. Plus your system will have access to its local optimzier thereby ensuring the SQL is efficient.
If you are going to use one EUL you need to start out on a sound foundation. This means using libraries to control access too business areas and workbooks. You'll need to adopt some simple naming standards to keep things separate and manageable. I wrote a paper about libraries a few years ago and it is available free of change here on my website: http://ascbi.com/downloads.htm. The paper is called Discoverer Libraries - a Concept.
Best wiishes
Michael

Printing long Discoverer reports(25 columns)

Hi Gurus,
The discoverer reports are columnar reports and long sometimes(having 25 columns). Is there a way to print a discoverer report so that it fits in one page if it does not fit into portrait and landscape page setups?
Thanks,
Pooja

You can apply a scaling factor to your report: I believe you can specify upto a 10% value, which means the report will be shrunk to 10% of its size. This should allow you to print a wide report without having the columns wrap to a second page. Though I am not sure how readable such a report would be. You could alternately choose a wider paper size.
Thanks
Abhinav

PowerDesigner 16.5 SP02 HTML Report Display Column Comments

Hi All,
I am using PowerDesigner 16.5 SP02 and am trying to view the column comments in an HTML Report. I know that you can enable Table comments and such in the report wizard but I can't find anything on columns. Any help is much appreciated.
- Eric

@ Stefan,
Thanks for your reply. RMB = Right Mouse Button? That's a new one for me.
I wasn't able to find "Table – List of Table Columns" but I expanded "Table" in "report layout" and then selected "column" and sequentially, "comments".
In the HTML report I am able to click a diagram and the column comments are shown in a list.
Is there anyway to have the column comments display within the diagram? This is wishful thinking rather.
Thanks again.
- Eric

Discoverer Report Names

Discoverer Report Naming
Our service Provider has created lot many reports for us and now theres a need for a generic naming to be followed for the Discoverer reports. Could someone tell me how difficult it would be to rename all the reports?
As I could see, theres a dataitem for the Discoverer Report names, I would imagine the report names are somewhere stored in the database as values in a DB table. So if the name of the report is stored in the database in a table , then it is simpler enough to change the value of the column. It would be more of a find and replace command in SQL.But I'm not sure whether this would have an impact on the actual Report name! for our service provider is telling us that they need to open every report in Discovere to rename and store it. Then they need to delete the other report- which I doubt as I'm not sure !
Also I would like to know where and how the names of the Discoverer Reports are saved in the database?
Kindly advice.Many thanks

Hi,
You can inform to your SP to edit the table EUL4_documents
and ask him to modify the name of the report that is stored in the column DOC_NAME .There is absolutely no necessary to open the work book that is stored in the database and change the work book name
Regards
Swamy!

How to get the execution time of a Discoverer Report from qpp_stats table

Hello
by reading some threads on this forum I became aware of the information stored in eul5_qpp_stats table. I would like to know if I can use this table to determine the execution time of a worksheet. In particular it looks like the field qs_act_elap_time stores the actual elapsed time of each execution of specific worksheet: am I correct? If so, how is this value computed? What's the unit of measure? I assume it's seconds, but then I've seen that sometimes I get numbers with decimals.
For example I ran a worksheet and it took more than an hour to run, and the value I get in the qs_act_elap_time column is 2218.313.
Assuming the unit of measure was seconds than it would mean approx 37 mins. Is that the actual execution time of the query on the database? I guess the actual execution time on my Discoverer client was longer since some calculations were performed at the client level and not on the database.
I would really appreciate if you could shed some light on this topic.
Thanks and regards
Giovanni

Thanks a lot Rod for your prompt reply.
I agree with you about the accuracy of the data. Are you aware of any other way to track the execution times of Discoverer reports?
Thanks
Giovanni

Discoverer report running for hours

Hi,
One of the custom discoverer report (based on custom SQL) is running for hours.
When U ran the query for the respective folder, the results were returned in few seconds.
Hence, data size is not an issue. How can I identify the cause and solve it?
Thanks,
Kamath.

Hello
If you dont need to run the report urgently then you can always schedule it to run the background till it is finished.
First log into desktop. Select tools > options > query governor tab. Make sure only radio button named "Never" is ticked. Leave all other options empty / not ticked. Click OK when ur done.
Then go to File > Manage Workbooks > Scheduling Manager > Schedule.... button then choose either My Computer or Database depending on where your report is stored. Scroll down and find your report. Enter a time and date that you want to start running the report. When you are done click Finish button. Normally the report would run for an hour or till it is complete. But it won't bomb out.
After 2 hours or even the next morning go to File > Manage workbooks > then look for your report > if it has run successfully then the status column would return something positive like "completed successfully". just double click your report and your are done....
It works for me if i need to run one of my reports. but that is only if your not in a rush to run your report
Hope it helps
Edited by: iandekoker on Jun 11, 2009 12:48 PM
Edited by: iandekoker on Jun 11, 2009 12:49 PM

Oracle Discoverer report shows drilldown icon in Web version

Hi ,
I am trying to create a new CROSS TAB Discoverer report. I made all my development done using the Discoverer desktop edition and is fine. When I saved in the database and showed the same report the User, in the Web Version, the report shows ' >' icon in all the cross tab headings and when the cursor is moved there, it gives an option to Drill down.
We have 3 fields which are selected but not shown in the report. It shows the drill down to those 3 fields.
My questions is:
1. I should not allow users to drill down. It should not show that option.
How to disable that option in the Web Version.
Any help in this regard is highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Kiran Kesari

Yogini is correct, but the solution provided will remove drill capability for all users under all circumstances. This is a "shortcoming" of Disco. If you set up a hierarchy for the users to use for drilling, the users must have the drill out privilege. This has the additional effect of adding the "Drill to related..." feature to most (and I believe all) columns.

Database column comments in Discoverer report

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for