Database Size for XI

We have our XI on Oracle/Linux. I need help in doing capacity planning for this server.
How do you size the XI database?

Hi
Please try the followimg link on sizing.
https://websmp201.sap-ag.de/sizing
Hope it helps.

Similar Messages

Calculate database size for a particular company code

Hi Experts,
We have 30 company codes in our FI production system. So to plan another new company code to be deployed into the system, we need to know exact capacity (database) of the previous company code that we already deployed. Kindly let me know whether it possible to calculate the database size for a particular company code in a ERP system.

>
Kalyan Kumar Bandlamudi wrote:
> Hi Experts,
>
> We have 30 company codes in our FI production system. So to plan another new company code to be deployed into the system, we need to know exact data capacity (database) of the previous company code that we already deployed. Kindly let me know whether it possible to calculate the database size occupied for a particular company code in a SAP system.
Its not possible to calculate data size based on company code.
By creating company code It will not occupy much space. Depends on your posting documents for particular company codes.
Thanks
Siva

Is their a maximum database size for DB2?

Hello,
we got a request from our business to install a new bw system on DB2 V8.2/V9 with an estimated end size of 100 Terabyte. I know, we have to ask our hardware partner, for sizing and this will include, partitioning,... But the first question from my side is "Is their a maximum size for a db2 database installed on aix?" Has anybody experience with such a huge database. At the moment our biggest database is about 1,4 Terabyte.
Regards,
Alexander

Hi Alexander,
A 100TB size sounds ambitious ... any thoughts to when the system will have that size ? It will also be interesting to understand if it's a OLTP or OLAP system.
There is a "theoritical" technical limit on the total size of a database, but that's really beyond reason. Here is how it goes:
A regular tablespace can be no larger than 512GB per DPF partition. A large tablespace can be no larger than 16TB per DPF partition. You can have 32767 tablespaces in a database. You can have up to 999 DPF partitions in a partitioned database server.
Coming from that the current technical limit is:
Non-partitioned database server: 16TB x 32767 tablespaces
Partitioned database server: 16TB x 32767 tablespaces x 999 partitions.
Regards,
Torsten

Calculate the database size for a particular company code in SAP

Hi Experts,
We have 30 company codes in our FI production system. So to plan another new company code to be deployed into the system, we need to know exact data capacity (database) of the previous company code that we already deployed. Kindly let me know whether it possible to calculate the database size occupied for a particular company code in a SAP system.

>
Kalyan Kumar Bandlamudi wrote:
> Hi Experts,
>
> We have 30 company codes in our FI production system. So to plan another new company code to be deployed into the system, we need to know exact data capacity (database) of the previous company code that we already deployed. Kindly let me know whether it possible to calculate the database size occupied for a particular company code in a SAP system.
Its not possible to calculate data size based on company code.
By creating company code It will not occupy much space. Depends on your posting documents for particular company codes.
Thanks
Siva

Best practice on mailbox database size & we need how many server for deployment exchange server 2013

Dear all,
We have an server that runs Microsoft exchange server 2007 with the following specification:
4 servers: Hub&CAS1 & Hub&CAS2 & Mailbox1 & Mailbox2
Operating System : Microsoft Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise x64
6 mailbox databases
1500 Mailboxes
We need to upgrade our exchange server from 2007 to 2013 to fulfill the following requirment:
I want to upgrade the exchange server 2007 to exchange server 2013 and implement the following details:
1500 mailboxes
10GB or 15GB mailbox quota for each user
How many
servers and databases are
required for this migration<ins cite="mailto:Mohammad%20Ashouri" datetime="2014-05-18T22:41"></ins>?
Number of the servers:
Number of the databases:
Size of each database:
Many thanks.

You will also need to check server role requirement in exchange 2013. Please go through this link to calculate the server role requirement : http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2013/05/14/released-exchange-2013-server-role-requirements-calculator.aspx
2TB is recommended maximum database size for Exchange 2013 databases.
Here is the complete checklist to upgrade from exchange 2007 to 2013 : http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff805032%28v=exchg.150%29.aspx
Meanwhile, to reduce the risks and time consumed during the completion of migration process, you can have a look at this proficient application(http://www.exchangemigrationtool.com/) that would also be
a good approach for 1500 users. It will help you to ensure the data security during the migration between exchange 2007 and 2013.

What is the best practice on mailbox database size in exchange 2013

Hi,
does anybody have any links to good sites that gives some pros/cons when it comes to the mailbox database sizes in exchange 2013? I've tried to google it - but hasn't found any good answers. I would like to know if I really need more than 5 mailbox databases
or not on my exchange environment.

Hi
As far as I know, 2TB is recommended maximum database size for Exchange 2013 databases.
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here
Terence Yu
TechNet Community Support

One of the BizTalk Server processes in the affected computer is being throttled for significant periods because of high database size exceeding the threshold

Hello Experts,
I have complex Biz Talk 2013 farm having 20 servers,15 Hosts. In my production environment even if there is no traffic i am getting throttling errors from SCOM for my all the production hosts.
Error : One of the BizTalk Server processes in the affected computer is being throttled for significant
periods because of high database size exceeding the threshold
I checked following things:
1. MsgBoxDB size 748732 KB
2. Spool table size 53 MB
3. Tracking DB size 26724 KB
4. Host settings -- Message Queue Size = 100, MsgCount = 50000 , Spool MP = 10 , Tracking MP = 10
5. Ran Message Box viewer and did not found any error related to DB size. (which counter i should focus on in MBV)
Note -- for DB i am sharing full backup size because it does not have log file size.
Please suggest where i should focus?
Is SCOM reporting correctly because everything is fine in biztalk ?
Thanks
Yagya
https://www.mcpvirtualbusinesscard.com/VBCServer/card.aspx?tag=YagyaDattMishra&wa=wsignin1.0

Hi Yagyam
I remember this error from SCOM when you use the standard SCOM BizTalk pack.
Check the eventlog of the server, do you see any errors in event log, this could give some clue to the root cause. Whenever you have this alert from SCOM, you must have
some entries in eventlog relating to the alert raised by SCOM.
Is your message processing by BizTalk hosts are normal? Run the performance monitor to see the bottleneck. Check if there is really throttling.
As mentioned in this blog, check the state of the SQL Agent on BizTalk's SQL database server, may be try restart the SQL Agent on BizTalk's SQL database server.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/timdel/archive/2008/11/19/why-i-love-scom.aspx
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

To list only user databases with the size for a instance in sql server 2005

Hi,
I looking for T-SQl to list only user databases with their size for a instance in sql server 2005

Try this:
use [databasename]
go
if convert(varchar(20),SERVERPROPERTY('productversion')) like '8%'
SELECT [name], fileid, filename, [size]/128.0 AS 'Total Size in MB',
[size]/128.0 - CAST(FILEPROPERTY(name, 'SpaceUsed') AS int)/128.0 AS 'Available Space In MB',
CAST(FILEPROPERTY(name, 'SpaceUsed') AS int)/128.0 AS 'Used Space In MB',
(100-((([size]/128.0 - CAST(FILEPROPERTY(name, 'SpaceUsed') AS int)/128.0)/([size]/128.0))*100)) AS 'percentage Used'
,((CAST(FILEPROPERTY(name, 'SpaceUsed') AS int)/128.0)/([size]/128.0))*100 as 'percentage used'
FROM sysfiles
else
SELECT [name], file_id, physical_name, [size]/128.0 AS 'Total Size in MB',
[size]/128.0 - CAST(FILEPROPERTY(name, 'SpaceUsed') AS int)/128.0 AS 'Available Space In MB',
CAST(FILEPROPERTY(name, 'SpaceUsed') AS int)/128.0 AS 'Used Space In MB',
(100-((([size]/128.0 - CAST(FILEPROPERTY(name, 'SpaceUsed') AS int)/128.0)/([size]/128.0))*100)) AS 'percentage Used'
--,((CAST(FILEPROPERTY(name, 'SpaceUsed') AS int)/128.0)/([size]/128.0))*100 as 'percentage used'
FROM sys.database_files
go
Or can refer below link:
http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/scriptcenter/All-Databases-Data-log-a36da95d
Please click the Mark as answer button and vote as helpful if this reply solves your problem

Multiple DB DBLOCK SIZE for warehouse database?Suggest

Hi All,a faculty from Oracle University told me the idea behind having the multple DB DBlock sizes in Oracle is not the performance but just for the Transporting tablespaces ....Just confirm is that true??????
Database architects here are using larger Block sizes for tablespaces for Warehouse database....which I guess is of not any use...what you say?
Thanx in Advance
Gagan

gaganahuja wrote:
Hi All,a faculty from Oracle University told me the idea behind having the multple DB DBlock sizes in Oracle is not the performance but just for the Transporting tablespaces ....Just confirm is that true??????
Database architects here are using larger Block sizes for tablespaces for Warehouse database....which I guess is of not any use...what you say?Gagan,
one important point that is often overlooked in this discussion is that the cost based optimizer does a questionable job when dealing with objects in non-standard block size tablespaces when it comes to costing full segment scans (full table scans / index fast full scans).
The Oracle runtime engine adjusts the multi-block read size in non-standard block size tablespaces accordingly, which means that e.g. given a multi-block read count (MBRC) of 8 and a default block size of 8K it will attempt to request 64K (whenever possible, there are cases where this is not possible, reaching extent boundaries or blocks already in the buffer cache).
So in a 16K non-standard block size tablespace the MBRC will be adjusted to 4 at runtime (4*16K = 64K), and the same happens e.g. in a 2K non-standard tablespace where it will be adjusted to 32 (32*2K = 64K).
So apart from effects outlined above that might lead to a reduction of the actually requested multi-block read size there is no difference at runtime with regards to performing a full segment scan.
But unfortunately the cost based optimizer doesn't reflect this runtime behaviour properly, especially if CPU costing is enabled, which is the default in 10g and later.
I've recently run some test cases regarding this particular issue which were provided by Jonathan Lewis as part of the "Cost Based Oracle - Fundamentals" book against the 10.2.0.4 and 11.1.0.6/7 release and they show that the cost estimates are at least questionable. By the way, although I've run the tests against 10.2.0.4 and 11.1.0.6/7, they correspond to the results of previous releases, so the same applies to 10.1 and 9i as well.
For more information, see here: http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2009/02/cost-based-oracle-fundamentals-test.html
Regarding thoughts about putting indexes in larger block sizes, Richard Foote has some interesting notes that try to explain why it probably won't matter in most cases: http://en.wordpress.com/tag/index-block-size/
Regards,
Randolf
Oracle related stuff blog:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

Estimating the backup size for full database backup?

How to estimate the backup file size for the following backup command?
Oracle 10g R2 on HPUX
BACKUP INCREMENTAL LEVEL 0 DATABASE;
Thank you,
Smith

Depends on the number of used blocks, block size etc. You could probably get a rough formula for backup size based on the contents of dba_tab_statistics (subtract empty_blocks), dba_ind_statistics etc.

Best Oracle datafile size for a SAP ECC6 database.

Hello,
We plan to migrate our ECC6 SAP database on a new Windows X64 plateforme running with :
- Windows 2008 R2
- Oracle 10.2.0.5.
The actual Oracle database size is more 2 Tbytes.
Please could help me to find the best size for the Oracle datafile in this new plateform ?
Today we create Oracle Tablespace for SAP with 8 GBytes datafiles but we have too many datafiles to managed.
Do you have experimented 16 GBytes, 32 GBytes, 64 Gbytes datafiles for Oracle Tablespaces on this kind of SAP Plateform ?
Thank you very much for your reply.
Best regards.
Jean-Pascal.

Hello Jean-Pascal,
well the answer as usual - it depends )
We already discussed that topic some time ago - please check this thread:
big file or small file
Your storage sub system and stripping matters of course too.
Regrds
Stefan

Query for to get database size, used size, freesize, db size after drop

Pls give me a query for to get database size, used size, freesize, tablespacesize of sometables which is starting with 'RQ%'
I have to get result like this
Total size, used size, free size ,tablespace size of RQ tables alone
Reason why i go for "tablespace size of RQ tables" i want to know the size of database after deleting the rq tables
Pls reply
S

i tried with
SELECT
--fs.tablespace_name name,
df.totalspace/1024/1024 mbytes,
(df.totalspace - fs.freespace)/1024/1024 used,
fs.freespace/1024/1024 free
FROM
(SELECT
--tablespace_name,
ROUND(SUM(bytes)) TotalSpace
FROM
dba_data_files
) df,
(SELECT
--tablespace_name,
ROUND(SUM(bytes)) FreeSpace
FROM
dba_free_space
) fs
i AM GETTING total bytes, used bytes, free bytes
I WANT TO include one more column.. database size after deleting rq tables
Pls reply
S
Edited by: AswinGousalya on Jul 10, 2009 2:17 PM

CPU and RAM size for database

How can we see what is the CPU and RAM size for the database?
<div class="jive-quote">select * from v$version</div>
BANNER
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.5.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.5.0 - Production
CORE     10.2.0.5.0     Production
TNS for HPUX: Version 10.2.0.5.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.5.0 - Production

cat /proc/meminfo
root:     total:      used:      free:           shared:     buffers:     cached:
Mem:      1055760384     1041887232     13873152     0     100417536      711233536
Swap:      1077501952      8540160      1068961792
MemTotal:          1031016 kB
MemFree:          13548 kB
MemShared:          0 kB
Buffers:          98064 kB
Cached:               692320 kB
SwapCached:          2244 kB
Active:               563112 kB
Inact_dirty:          309584 kB
Inact_clean:          79508 kB
Inact_target:          190440 kB
HighTotal:          130992 kB
HighFree:          1876 kB
LowTotal:          900024 kB
LowFree:          11672 kB
SwapTotal:          1052248 kB
SwapFree:          1043908 kB
Committed_AS:          332340 kB
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 15
model : 31
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+
stepping : 0
cpu MHz : 994.927
cache size : 512 KB
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce (snipped)
bogomips : 1956.97
TLB size : 1024 4K pages
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts fid vid ttp

Best size for VM SQL Server for a start or maybe Azure SQL Database?

Hello Everyone,
My question is quite general but some of You may have already considered similar issues. Let's say or assume I have the website and mobile application - social kind - used by:
1. 10 K users
2. 100 K users
3. 1 K K users
4. 20 K K users MAX
I am strongly considering use of VM SQL Server mostly because of its PARTITIONING functionality, some advantages in the context of INDEXING compared to Azure SQL Database and JOBs availibility.
Question: what would be the best size and count of VMs related to SQL Server for the start and later?
Question 2 - I am able to move JOBs functionality to my Worker role if I wanted to consider use of Azure SQL Database. SQL Server still has at least those 2 advantages (Partitioning, better Indexing) - is it worth considering Azure SQL Database service for
100 K users and more?
Regards,

Hello Jambor,
Considering the number of users i wouldnt recommend an Azure SQL database, because of certain limitations like Max worker threads, Max sessions, etc. Also the maximum size of the database can be 500GB.
Please refer http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/dn741336.aspx and http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/dn369873.aspx for the Azure SQL database options and limitations.
If your application needs to scale-out, Azure SQL Databases are recommended. If it needs scaling-up - then the choice is SQL Server on Azure VM. Please refer http://azure.microsoft.com/blog/2012/06/26/data-series-sql-server-in-windows-azure-virtual-machine-vs-sql-database/
and http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/data-management-azure-sql-database-and-sql-server-iaas/ for comparison.
If you already have your application running successfully on your on-premise server, you could use a similar machine on Azure for hosting your SQL server instance. The options are at http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/virtual-machines/. You could
start with a SQL Server enterprise edition on an A3 VM and then scale-up as needed.
Regards,
Kumar Bijayanta

SQL azure database size not dropping down after deleting all table

Dear all,
I have a simple database on Azure for which I have deleted all table data. The size of the database is still showing 5Mb of data and I am charge for that. I have heard that this may happen from cluster index getting fragmented.
I have run a querry I found on internet on all my table index to show percentage of fragmentation and all report 0%.
DBA is not so my job but what could it be or how can I reduce that size ?
ON premise I would use COMPACT DB but not available in azure like some others DB action
Thnaks for tips
regards

user created objects/data are not the only ones stored in your database. you got system objects and metadata as Mike mentions above.
are you trying to skip being charged if you're not storing data? looking at the pricing table, you'll still get charged the $4.995 for the 0-100MB database size range.

Database Size for XI

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for