Database upgradation issue

Hi All,
After upgrading the database to 10.2,
select COMP_NAME,VERSION,STATUS from dba_registry;
shows
Oracle Ultra Search 9.2.0.7.0 NO SCRIPT
what can be the reason ?
Regards,
Neeraj

check the log of catpatch.sql and rerun the catchpatch.sql aand check the log of catchpatch.sql make sure there should be no error in log file..

Similar Messages

Oracle Database upgrade to 11G (Host_Command Issues)

Sorry I'm posting this again. Original post in Database - Upgrade. I'm not getting a lot of clicks in that category
We recently upgraded to Oracle 11g (Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production). Our PL/SQL release: (PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production). We use a lot of host commands inside our PL/SQL stored procedures. One of these included fetching data from an external server and pushing the data into Oracle Tables.
Most of this process is running fine, except the execution never completes. There is no issue data wise. It's just that the Host_command doesn't receive the completion status and seems to be running even though there's nothing going on in the background.
The Oracle e-business suite's concurrent program based on this stored proc also never completes, though it doesn't do anything in the background. For testing purpose, our DBA used 2 insert statements one before and one after the host_command. The insert before the host_command worked but not the one after. Please help! This is happening after we upgraded to 11g 3 weeks ago!
Thanks, Naveen Gagadam.

Pl do not post duplicates - Upgrade to 11g, Host Command Inside Stored Proc doesn't end.
I have moved your duplicate post to the EBS forums
Srini

Database bug issue after upgrade ( version 8.1.7.4)

Hi,
Currently our database version is 8.1.7.0.0
We have planned to upgrade our database to 10g Rel2 and for that we have already applied terminal patch set (i.e. 8.1.7.4).
But after applying terminal patch set we came through list of the GENERIC bug fixes included in the 817X Patch Sets. i.e.
ALERT: Oracle8i Release 3 (8.1.7) Support Status and Alerts
Note :- 120607.1
Actually in this note we are having confusion whether to apply the patch or not for the bug that is mentioned.
Some are those which affect Oracle 8.1.7.X releases are :
1)Trigger updates wrong after DROP functional index Note 259854.1
2)Changing the Database Character Set can corrupt LOBs Note 118242.1
3)Large export buffer can produce corrupt export file Note 223399.1
4)Export can generate a corrupt export file Note 199416.1
The first one has been applied successully, but having confusion with the remaining,
Question regarding points 2 & 3 above :
2)
As we are not going to alter our database character set (WE8ISO8859P1) at 8.1.7.4, so is it required to apply the patch ???
or will have to apply as we are going to upgrade it further to 10g Rel2(Here database character set might get change) for future upgradation ???
3)
Currently our database export is being done via conventional path
Now, the workaround mentioned in the patch is as follows :
(Patch is not available for Windows OS)
Workaround
~~~~~~~~~~
1. Prior to a Conventional path export, set the environment variable
ORA_OCI_NO_OPTIMIZED_FETCH to 1.
Windows:
set ORA_OCI_NO_OPTIMIZED_FETCH=1
OR:
2. Export the data in Direct path mode, by specifiying the additional
export parameter: DIRECT=Y
So the query is,
I am not getting any parameter like ORA_OCI_NO_OPTIMIZED_FETCH.
Is there any parameter like ORA_OCI_NO_OPTIMIZED_FETCH in oracle 8.1.7.4 ?
OR
Will have to change the export method to direct mode ? by doing so will there be any adverse effect ?
With Regards

You are repeating a question that you already made on your previous thread.
Re: Database upgradation to 9i rel2
Regards,
Francisco Munoz Alvarez
www.oraclenz.com

Perfomance Issue after Database Upgrade in 11i

Hi All,
We upgraded database from 9.2.0.5 to 10.2.0.4, the system was running fine. One month after upgrade we changed the compatibility from 9.2.0 to 10.2.0 for compatibilty and optimizers. Since then perfomance is poor for self service and PTO carry over is taking more then 10 hours, earlier which completes in 1:15 min to 1:30 min. I logged a SR and following with Oracle Support.
Are there any _"Best Practices"_ to be followed after database upgrade from 9i to 10g in 11.5.10.2.
All the database parameters has been set as recommeded by metalink note:216205.1
How frequently gather schema statistics should be run on production?
Thnaks in Advance for help.

Are there any _"Best Practices"_ to be followed after database upgrade from 9i to 10g in 11.5.10.2.
All the database parameters has been set as recommended by metalink note:216205.1
The best practice is to adjust initialization parameters as per the note referenced above.
In addition, review the following note carefully:
Note: 744143.1 - Tuning performance on eBusiness suite
https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=744143.1
How frequently gather schema statistics should be run on production?Note: 168136.1 - How Often Should Gather Schema Statistics Program be Run?
https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=168136.1

Forms HOST command no longer works after database upgrade from 10g to 11g

Hi,
After upgrading the database 10g to 11g the forms HOST command no longer works on Unix server. The form used to work fine prior the upgrade. I read all the threads I could find and did not see any solutions. Adding PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH does not work because it does not even run a basic shell script. (I saw this solution, adding PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH, in many questions / threads).
1. I wouldn't expect the database upgrade to be an issue, but it is the only change we had.
2. Note, 11g is Oracle Fusion Middleware which is quite a bit different than 10g.
I even tried the most basic commands like "echo" which is a build-in Unix command and there is no directory for it (ie. no /usr/bin - so variable PATH is irrelvent). i.e HOST('echo hi'); and HOST('echo "hi" '); and even HOST ('echo hi > /my_file.txt'); all returns FORMS_FAILURE (actually the if is IF FORM_SUCCESS THEN ... else ... and the else part always runs now - whereas it didn't before.).
Or basic commands like /usr/bin/ls as in HOST(/usr/bin/ls). At that point I was just testing the Unix command would return FORM_SUCCESS even though I could not see the results (because they weren't writing to a log file). Notice that I'm using the direct path /usr/bin so no Unix environment variables were needed.
The form does use webutil but that part works. For example, we have webutil_file_transfer( ....) The file shows up on the application server and in the expected directory.
Here's the main goal. Upload a file from clients local PC to the datebase server. The form uploads the file to the Application server, then we have a Unix script to scp (secure copy) the file from the application server to the database server. IF webutil, or any other Oracle functions could put the file on the database server that would be better. But, I don't know of any procedures that do that - or would have done it cleanly (i.e. storing to database and write back to server and then using a blob etc. )
Anyway, I was hoping someone would help with either of these.
1) Get the HOST command to work. - If we can get that to work then I wouldn't need any more help. We can just call the already existing Unix script to copy the file from the application server to the database.
2) OR be able to upload directly to the database server - wanted to do that originally
Any help would be appreciated

Solution for those interested and for anyone else searching this forum for a solution
I found this on My Oracle Support:
<h3>Host Command from Forms Not Working in 11g in Sun Solaris Sparc OS [ID 1157346.1]</h3>
Applies To: Oracle Forms - Version 11.1.1.1.0 and later
Sun SPARC Sun OS
Symptoms:
When trying to execute a Shell script or any OS command using the host() Built-in from Forms 11g, the host()command is not getting executed. The same functionality works on other operating systems and in previous versions like 10gR2.
Steps to be followed:
1) Take a backup and edit the $DOMAIN_HOME/config/fmwconfig/servers/WLS_FORMS/applications/formsapp_11.1.1/config/default.env or any custom environment file.
2) Locate the following environment variable:
LD_PRELOAD=/ora10gas/app/11.1.0/Middleware/as_1/jdk/jre/lib/sparcv9/libjsig.so
3) Comment out this variable. After the changes, it will look like the following:
#LD_PRELOAD=/ora10gas/app/11.1.0/Middleware/as_1/jdk/jre/lib/sparcv9/libjsig.so
3) a) Instead of LD_PRELOAD, kindly use LD_PRELOAD_64 as given below :
LD_PRELOAD_64=/ora10gas/app/11.1.0/Middleware/as_1/jdk/jre/lib/sparcv9/libjsig.so
(This makes HOST AND RUN_REPORT_OBJECT work fine).
4) Save the file and execute your forms. The Host() built-in will work as expected
The LD_PRELOAD setting in default.env is only required for the working of signal chaining facility in JVM version 1.5 and later. If you are not using theSignal chaining facility, this variable is not required. For more information, refer to the following documentation
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E14571_01/doc.1111/e14772/forms.htm#CJAJGAFF

Testing while doing the database upgrade from 9.2.0.6 to 11.2.0.2 apps ?

Dear Experts,
Please note that we are in process of doing database upgrade from 9.2.0.6 to 11.2.0.2 ?
We have gone through the interoperablity note id for 11i 11gr2 ?
Step 1
upgrading the database from 9.2.0.6 to 9.2.0.8 ?
Step 2-
Upgrading the Forms patchset to 19 ?
Step-3
Applying the Rollup-6 patch ?
Step -4
Upgrading the database from 9.2.0.8 to 11.2.0.2 ?
We would like to know whether after each step do we have to do any kind of testing on the Oracle Application Instance and the database?
Please advise.
Regards
Mohammed.

We would like to know whether after each step do we have to do any kind of testing on the Oracle Application Instance and the database?There is no such a list. However, you can refer to the documents referenced in each task above and it should cover if any testing need to be done or not (for example, the Developer Patchset doc). For the rest of the docs you will have to do your regular testing (test the application/database and make sure it is working properly).
Also, make sure you review (Known issues on Top of 11i.ATG_PF.H. delta.6 (RUP6) - 5903765 [ID 459353.1]).
ATG RUP 7 is the latest 11i.ATG_PF patch.
About Oracle Applications Technology 11i.ATG_PF.H.delta.7 (RUP 7) [ID 783600.1]
Known Issues On Top of 11i.ATG_PF.H.delta.7 (RUP7) - 6241631 [ID 858801.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

How can I determine what sites are being referenced within Central Admin Upgrade and Migration Manage Databases Upgrade Status?

When I go to Central Admin > Upgrade and Migration > Manage Databases Upgrade Status, I have 2 content databases which have the status:
Database is up to date, but some sites are not completely upgraded.
How can I determine which sites are not completely upgraded?

Manage Databases Upgrade Status will provide you all active and offline DB details, you can get same result
using below PowerShell cmdlet.
Get-SPDatabase and Get-SPContentDatabase will provide all active database/Content DB in Farm which include Service application db, central admin DB.
Get-SPDatabase | Format-Table Name, ID
Coming back to your question, if you find that there are some site are not completely upgraded then run below command and understand the cause if issue on specific DB.
Test-SPContentDatabase WSS_ContentDB_Name
If you find any missing file issue in DB then resolve these issue to upgrade content database.
(verify all customizations referenced within the content database are also installed in the web application. This cmdlet can be issued
against a content database currently attached to the farm, or a content database that is not connected to the farm )
Use the Upgrade-SPContentDatabase cmdlet
to resume a failed database upgrade or begin a build-to-build database upgrade against a SharePoint content database
Upgrade-SPContentDatabase WSS_Content
reference:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff607813(v=office.15).aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff607941(v=office.15).aspx
If my contribution helps you, please click Mark As Answer on that post and
Vote as Helpful
Thanks, ShankarSingh(MCP)

Database Upgrade 10.1.0.4 to 10.2.0.4

Newbie here.
So I am starting to use OEM on Windows XP workstation and have upgraded it to 10.2.0.4 and also wanted to upgrade the repository to 10.2.0.4 as well.
So this is what I have done so far.
I have installed 10.2.0.1 into a new home. I have patch it to 10.2.0.4. I am using DBUA to upgrade the database and have set my ORACLE_HOME to the new home and started DBUA. Everything is working just fine until the new OracleService is created and is trying to start. I received a message that it is unable to start service. If i click on continue I received the ORA-12560 TNS error. I have tried multiple times to get this to work and it always fails on this part..
Also to let you know that when I connect to SQLPlus before upgrade I have to connect using sysplus sysman/xxxxx@emrep with out emrep it won't connect. I have also set TNS_ADMIN to the original homes network/admin directory.
I have research the documentation on upgrading, but maybe I am missing a step or someone has run into the same issue.
Any help you can lend me would be appreciated.

The database files won't be copied over. As general practice, databases aren't stored under Oracle Homes. You could always fix that by moving the database, backup the control file to trace, and edit it with new file locations. I wouldn't worry about that right now.
Did you run the prerequisite script before trying to upgrade?
<10.2 HOME>/rdbms/admin/utlu102i.sql
Once a database is opened upgrade, you won't be able to open it with the old binaries.
Was the listener up when you tried to connect to it with 10.1? Were there any errors?
The manual process of upgrading the database is to export the 10.2 env, open the database upgrade, upgrade the data dictionary <10.2HOME>/rdbms/admin/catupgrd.sql, startup the database normally, and Compile all the invalid objects <10.2HOME>/rdbms/admin/utlrp.sql. I would make sure to go over the sql that executes prerequisite checks and read through the upgrade docs. I would also take a backup before doing anything.

ECC 6.0 EHP-4 upgrade Issue in phase MAIN SHDRUN/ALTNTAB FILL were negative

Hi Basis Expert,
while doing ECC 6.0 EHP-4 Upgrade in MAIN_SHDRUN/ALTNTAB_FILL phase we are getting the following issue please help us.
Checks after phase MAIN_SHDRUN/ALTNTAB_FILL were negative!
Last error code set: BATCH JOB RDDNT2MT FAILED: Error(s) found in the log(s), accumulated in "ALTNTFI.ELG".
We check the shadow instance is up and we can log in to the system. Check ST22 and SM21 notice no error.
Check the JOB RDDNT2MT (SM37) successfully running and all the job finish without any error.
Hope anybody can share a bit your experience on this issue. we try search the note and find the forum but no luck.
Thanks

Hi,
> 2EETG011 "No shadow system""(environment parameter)""auth_shadow_upgrade"
> 2EETG011 "No shadow system""DB-connect not against shadow tables !"
>
It looks from your log that shadow system is not able to connect to database. Please check your shadow system. Check below link as well:
http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-basis/ecc-6-upgrade-issue-in-phase-altntab_fill-1556272
Thanks
Sunny
Edited by: Sunny Pahuja on Oct 15, 2010 1:27 PM

Database Upgrade Agent not working for upgrading Oracle 9i DB to Oracle 10i

Hi All,
Presently I have completed my Oracle 10i installation on Solaris Server but I am facing an issue during the upgrade process of Oracle 9i to 10g. Whenever I try to upgrade the 9i databases to 10g using DBUA(Database Upgrade assistant) I am facing an issue that Data base not running from oracle home or pfile not found. The exact error message says:-
The upgrade assistant failed in bringing up the database XIPCOTS. Oracle Home /opt/apps/home/oracle9i/product/releases/92/92 obtained from file /var/opt/oracle/oratab was used to connect to the database. Either the database is not running from Oracle Home /opt/apps/home/oracle9i/product/releases/92/92 or the correct Initialisation parameter file (pfile) was not found. To start the database , Oracle needs the pfile. Provide the full path name of the init file for the database XIPCOTS.
In reality the XIPCOTS database is running fine in Oracle 9i and we can connect it using PL/SQL developer in windows.I have also provided the path of pfile but it is still not accepting the same.
Path of pfile I provided :- /XIP/ofaroot/XIPCOTS/pfile/initXIPCOTS.ora
Any help or suggestions would be greately appreciated.
Our both Oracle 9i and 10g are installed on same Solaris server where solaris version is 9
Installation path for 9i :- /opt/apps/home/oracle9i/product/releases/92/92
Installation path for 10g :- /opt/apps/home/oracle/product/releases/10201
Oracle 9i version :- 9.2.0.7
Oracle 10g version :- 10.2.01
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Gourav Banerjee

Can you please mention the specific folder name under oracle home where we need to put this pfile because there are two folder dbs and ds I have allready tried putting it inside dbs its not working. And my home path is correct I hope and is set for oracle 9i directories in the .oraenv file do we need to set it for oracle 10g before the DBUA upgrade.

Database Upgrade to 10.2.0.4

Using Windows 2003 64-bit, 10.2.0.3 Standard Edition.
I clone the database to a spare server, shut it down immediate, and stopped all Oracle services. I installed the 10.2.0.4 patchset into the original Oracle Home without a problem. I then ran the Database Upgrade Assistant and it ran through to completion. However, it did declare a series of errors when upgrading the 'Data Mining' component:
Error ignored: ORA-29831: operator binding not found ORA-06553: PLS-306: wrong number or types of arguments in call to 'SDO_FILTER'
...and others like it. The report at the end of the process is saying the Oracle Server component is 'Successful *' -and the asterisk links to a list of the errors that I clicked 'ignore' to during the process. The one for 'data mining' says 'Skipped'.
I don't think I mind the errors about Data Mining, because as far as I know, we don't use that (are we even allowed to on an SE license?) When I look in V$OPTION, for example, we get:
OLAP Window Functions TRUE
Block Media Recovery FALSE
Fine-grained Auditing FALSE
Application Role FALSE
Enterprise User Security FALSE
Oracle Data Guard FALSE
Oracle Label Security FALSE
OLAP FALSE
Table compression FALSE
Join index FALSE
Trial Recovery FALSE
Data Mining                                                      FALSE
Online Redefinition FALSE
Streams Capture FALSE
File Mapping FALSE
So my question is: did the upgrade work properly or not?! Should I mind that the errors appeared when upgrading a component that doesn't even exist, as far as I know? Is there some way of knowing that all is as it should be?
I have logged onto the database after the upgrade and all looks fine, with queries working as expected and so on. But I just have a nagging doubt...

SQL> SELECT owner, object_type, COUNT(*)
2 FROM dba_objects
3 WHERE status = 'INVALID'
4 GROUP BY owner, object_type;
OWNER                          OBJECT_TYPE           COUNT(*)
MDSYS                          PACKAGE BODY                 1
ACC_GLOBAL                     PACKAGE BODY                 1The ACC_GLOBAL invalid is a known issue: I don't have the tnsnames.ora with the right alias for the resolution of a database link that package contains. MDSYS is not a schema we use, I think, and the package that's invalid is SDO_3GL which is the package I expected to be wrong as a result of the error messages received during the upgrade.
As for your second query:
COMP_NAME                                VERSION                        STATUS
Oracle interMedia                        10.2.0.4.0                     VALID
Oracle XML Database                      10.2.0.4.0                     VALID
Oracle Text                              10.2.0.4.0                     VALID
Oracle Data Mining                       10.2.0.3.0                     OPTION OFF
Oracle Expression Filter                 10.2.0.4.0                     VALID
Oracle Rule Manager                      10.2.0.4.0                     VALID
Oracle Workspace Manager                 10.2.0.4.3                     VALID
Oracle Database Catalog Views            10.2.0.4.0                     VALID
Oracle Database Packages and Types       10.2.0.4.0                     VALID
JServer JAVA Virtual Machine             10.2.0.4.0                     VALID
Oracle XDK                               10.2.0.4.0                     VALID
Oracle Database Java Packages            10.2.0.4.0                     VALIDDoesn't look a miserable failure to me, really. Data Mining doesn't look right, but we knew that already because of those error messages during the upgrade. Fact remains, we don't use it, it's not an option we've installed, etc etc.

CC&B 2.1 to 2.4 upgrade issues?

Has anyone encountered any real issues when doing the one step upgrade from CC&B 2.1 to CC&B 2.4

The installed_fixes only reflect the installation of the Application component of fixes. It sounds to me that you should check the following:
1. Check that you have run all the database upgrade scripts. You should have log files for these
2. Check the following table in CC&B to see if the database patches have been applied (CI_UT_INSTL, CI_UT_INSTL_DTL)
3. logon on to the database as the schema owner , usually cisadm to see if you can see the new / amended tables
4. If all steps above pass, logon to the database as the update user, usually cisuser.
If you cannot access the table then you may need to run oragensec to create the synonyms for the user, cisread.
Edited by: Paul Brown on Feb 21, 2012 4:15 PM

Standby upgrade issue

Hi
I have a 11gR1 database with dataguard setup.I have successfully upgraded the primary database to 11gR2 using dbua.
Although 11gR2 software is installed on standby server,I realized archivelogs were not shipped to standby server during the database upgrade.
When I switch logfile in primary, I see below errors in standby alertlog:
RFS: 'Attach' request version mismatchI think it is because the database versions become different after the upgrade( primary became 11.2, standby is still 11.1)
Because of this issue, archivelogs are not being transferred.
Do I manually need to edit oratab, create new spfile and start standby instance from new oracle home (11.2) ? These things were done automatically on primary database by dbua.

Hello;
The short story on this is :
See Oracle support article : How do you apply a Patchset,PSU or CPU in a Data Guard Physical Standby configuration [ID 278641.1]
My overview is :
Disable log shipping from the Primary.
Shutdown Standby .
Install 11.2.0.2 software only on the Standby.
Start the Standby in recovery mode ( using the new home and env. settings ) ( do not run DBUA on standby )
Re-enable log shipping
Monitor the redo apply from Primary to Standby -- this will upgrade the Standby
Your questions
Do I manually need to edit oratab, create new spfile and start standby instance from new oracle home (11.2) ?
You can edit the oratab afterwards on the standby.
You can move (copy) the spfile and password file to the new Oracle home on the standby. (This is what I do before restarting)
Yes, you need to change the env to the new Oracle home before starting up mount and starting recovery.
Just did four of these this week and I'm doing four more today. Will keep my eyes open for you.
Best Regards
mseberg
Later
Another thing I do is copy my tnsnames.ora and listener.ora to the new home on both the Standby and Primary and edit this in the listener.ora as needed :
(SID_DESC =
       (global_dbname = PRIMARY_DGMGRL.thanks.buddy.com)
       (ORACLE_HOME = /u01/app/oracle/product/11.2.0)
       (sid_name = PRIMARY)
    )Then if you restart the listeners on both and bounce the databases you will probably avoid a "heartbeat" error.
mseberg
Edited by: mseberg on Dec 10, 2011 6:12 AM

Oracle database upgrade from express edition to standard edition

We purchased Oracle database 11g to upgrade our current primavera oracle database express edition (10g).When we are trying to upgrade through DBUA it getting error message
Please provide us a proper advise to solve this issue.

1008016 wrote:
Windows 7 64 bit, please find the below error message when I am trying to upgrade through Database Upgrade Assistant
"Could not get database version from the "oracle server" component.The "CEP" file "D:\app\usr\product\11.2.0\dbhome_1\rdbms\admin\rdbmsup.sql" does not provide the version directiveTo upgrade to 11gR2, you need to be at 10.2.0.2 - hence the error
11gR2 DBUA States "The CEP File does not provide the version directive" [ID 980693.1]
As noted by orafad, the easiest approach would be to perform a full export from 10gR2, install 11gR2 into a new ORACLE_HOME, create an empty 11gR2 database, then perform a full import into 11gR2. As also noted, you will have to follow any special directions related to Primavera.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e23633/expimp.htm
You will need Win 7 Professional or higher (Home versions are not supported for Oracle installs)
HTH
Srini

Kernel Upgrade Issue

Hi,
After Kernel patch upgrade (level 1393), we got Short dump SAPSQL_ITAB_CANT_SCAN during address search (OSS 573808) in Modification adjustment screen.
Based on OSS#573808, 555655 said that we need to upgrade kernel patch 464 or higher for above issue. I just like to know, if this is major issue or not. Shall we can reset and continue our database upgrade? or we have to upgrade kernel patch 464 or higher?
Please input your valuable suggestions.
Regards
Srinivas

Shivam,
No, probably it will not create any problem, the higher versions having the downward compatibility.
But try to find root cause of the error. If you were unable to trace I suggest you to open an OSS message for the same.
Hope this help.
Regards,
Rajesh

Database upgradation issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for