Database version discrepancy...

If I check the properties of my post office in Console One, it says
database version is 12. If I check the configuration through the web
console, it says database version is 8. Why the discrepancy? How do
I fix it?
Thanks,
Ken

Originally Posted by dzanre
KeN Etter wrote:
> I'll try to get a 2012 client installed soon, just to verify. Thanks.
I'd be really surprised if it's not - ConsoleOne reads directly from the
database. The HTTP agents extrapolate their info from XML - so it's likely that
there was a bug with that for the version number.
Danita
Novell Knowledge Partner
Get Healthy with Danita
Which could be from upgrading the agents (inplace) but not running the agent configuration bit? Not sure which version references exactly get updated when running configure agents on an existing server.
-Willem

Similar Messages

  • Add management server: Setup version: 7.0.9538.0 is not compatible with database version: 7.1.10226.0

    I want to add another management server to our existing SCOM environment. But whenever I run this setup on a new server I get stuck in the window for selecting the OperationsManager database. The database field stays blank and in the OpsMgrSetupWizard log
    there are lines that the setup version is not compatible with the database version. But I use the same installer as when I installed the other management servers a year ago.
    Maybe there is a newer setup installer? But I can't find it.
    [10:42:54]: Error:
    :Error:setup version: 7.0.9538.0 is not compatible with database version: 7.1.10226.0
    [10:42:54]: Info:
    :Info:Using DB command timeout = 1800 seconds.
    [10:42:54]: Info:
    :Info:isOMDatabase:  Read returned true.  so far, this is OM DB, not an empty DB
    [10:42:54]: Debug:
    :Connection was not open.  We will try to open it.
    [10:42:54]: Debug:
    :SqlConnectionReady returned True.
    [10:42:54]: Info:
    :Info:Using DB command timeout = 1800 seconds.
    [10:42:54]: Info:
    :Info:isOMDatabase:  Read did not return true.  The MG is missing. This is not OM DB
    [10:42:54]: Info:
    :Info:Using DB command timeout = 1800 seconds.
    [10:42:54]: Always:
    :Azman store table not found in OperationsManagerDW table, assuming this is an not a valid OMDB for empty DB scenario.
    [10:42:54]: Info:
    :Info:DatabaseConfigurationPage: DB connection attempt completed.
    [10:42:54]: Info:
    :Info:DatabaseConfigurationPage: DB connection attempt completed.

    Never mind, found it!
    Apparently there was a newer version of SCOM setup in msdn and someone upgraded our existing SCOM environment. Downloaded the new setup, new report viewer controls and a System
    CLR Types for Microsoft® SQL Server® 2012 and now it works!! 

  • Selective XML Index feature is not supported for the current database version , SQL Server Extended Events , Optimizing Reading from XML column datatype

    Team , Thanks for looking into this  ..
    As a last resort on  optimizing my stored procedure ( Below ) i wanted to create a Selective XML index  ( Normal XML indexes doesn't seem to be improving performance as needed ) but i keep getting this error within my stored proc . Selective XML
    Index feature is not supported for the current database version.. How ever
    EXECUTE sys.sp_db_selective_xml_index; return 1 , stating Selective XML Indexes are enabled on my current database .
    Is there ANY alternative way i can optimize below stored proc ?
    Thanks in advance for your response(s) !
    /****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes] Script Date: 3/11/2015 3:10:42 PM ******/
    SET ANSI_NULLS ON
    GO
    SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
    GO
    -- EXEC [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes]
    ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes]
    AS
    BEGIN
    SET NOCOUNT ON --Does'nt have impact ( May be this wont on SQL Server Extended events session's being created on Server(s) , DB's )
    SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED
    select getdate() as getdate_0
    DECLARE @XML XML , @Prev_Insertion_time DATETIME
    -- Staging Previous Load time for filtering purpose ( Performance optimize while on insert )
    SET @Prev_Insertion_time = (SELECT MAX(EE_Time_Stamp) FROM dbo.MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log ) -- Perf Optimize
    -- PRINT '1'
    CREATE TABLE #Temp
    EventName VARCHAR(100),
    Time_Stamp_EE DATETIME,
    ObjectName VARCHAR(100),
    ObjectType VARCHAR(100),
    DbName VARCHAR(100),
    ddl_Phase VARCHAR(50),
    ClientAppName VARCHAR(2000),
    ClientHostName VARCHAR(100),
    server_instance_name VARCHAR(100),
    ServerPrincipalName VARCHAR(100),
    nt_username varchar(100),
    SqlText NVARCHAR(MAX)
    CREATE TABLE #XML_Hold
    ID INT NOT NULL IDENTITY(1,1) PRIMARY KEY , -- PK necessity for Indexing on XML Col
    BufferXml XML
    select getdate() as getdate_01
    INSERT INTO #XML_Hold (BufferXml)
    SELECT
    CAST(target_data AS XML) AS BufferXml -- Buffer Storage from SQL Extended Event(s) , Looks like there is a limitation with xml size ?? Need to re-search .
    FROM sys.dm_xe_session_targets xet
    INNER JOIN sys.dm_xe_sessions xes
    ON xes.address = xet.event_session_address
    WHERE xes.name = 'Capture DDL Schema Changes' --Ryelugu : 03/05/2015 Session being created withing SQL Server Extended Events
    --RETURN
    --SELECT * FROM #XML_Hold
    select getdate() as getdate_1
    -- 03/10/2015 RYelugu : Error while creating XML Index : Selective XML Index feature is not supported for the current database version
    CREATE SELECTIVE XML INDEX SXI_TimeStamp ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml)
    FOR
    PathTimeStamp ='/RingBufferTarget/event/timestamp' AS XQUERY 'node()'
    --RETURN
    --CREATE PRIMARY XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold] ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml) -- Ryelugu 03/09/2015 - Primary Index
    --SELECT GETDATE() AS GETDATE_2
    -- RYelugu 03/10/2015 -Creating secondary XML index doesnt make significant improvement at Query Optimizer , Instead creation takes more time , Only primary should be good here
    --CREATE XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold_values] ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml) -- Ryelugu 03/09/2015 - Primary Index , --There should exists a Primary for a secondary creation
    --USING XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold]
    ---- FOR VALUE
    -- --FOR PROPERTY
    -- FOR PATH
    --SELECT GETDATE() AS GETDATE_3
    --PRINT '2'
    -- RETURN
    SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_3
    INSERT INTO #Temp
    EventName ,
    Time_Stamp_EE ,
    ObjectName ,
    ObjectType,
    DbName ,
    ddl_Phase ,
    ClientAppName ,
    ClientHostName,
    server_instance_name,
    nt_username,
    ServerPrincipalName ,
    SqlText
    SELECT
    p.q.value('@name[1]','varchar(100)') AS eventname,
    p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime') AS timestampvalue,
    p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS objectname,
    p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_type"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') AS ObjectType,
    p.q.value('(./action[@name="database_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS databasename,
    p.q.value('(./data[@name="ddl_phase"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') AS ddl_phase,
    p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_app_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS clientappname,
    p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_hostname"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS clienthostname,
    p.q.value('(./action[@name="server_instance_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS server_instance_name,
    p.q.value('(./action[@name="nt_username"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS nt_username,
    p.q.value('(./action[@name="server_principal_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS serverprincipalname,
    p.q.value('(./action[@name="sql_text"]/value)[1]','Nvarchar(max)') AS sqltext
    FROM #XML_Hold
    CROSS APPLY BufferXml.nodes('/RingBufferTarget/event')p(q)
    WHERE -- Ryelugu 03/05/2015 - Perf Optimize - Filtering the Buffered XML so as not to lookup at previoulsy loaded records into stage table
    p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime') >= ISNULL(@Prev_Insertion_time ,p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime'))
    AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="ddl_phase"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') ='Commit' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - Every Event records a begin version and a commit version into Buffer ( XML ) we need the committed version
    AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_type"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') <> 'STATISTICS' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - May be SQL Server Internally Creates Statistics for #Temp tables , we do not want Creation of STATISTICS Statement to be logged
    AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') NOT LIKE '%#%' -- Any stored proc which creates a temp table within it Extended Event does capture this creation statement SQL as well , we dont need it though
    AND p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_app_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') <> 'Replication Monitor' --Ryelugu : 03/09/2015 We do not want any records being caprutred by Replication Monitor ??
    SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_4
    -- SELECT * FROM #TEMP
    -- SELECT COUNT(*) FROM #TEMP
    -- SELECT GETDATE()
    -- RETURN
    -- PRINT '3'
    --RETURN
    INSERT INTO [dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log]
    [UserName]
    ,[DbName]
    ,[ObjectName]
    ,[client_app_name]
    ,[ClientHostName]
    ,[ServerName]
    ,[SQL_TEXT]
    ,[EE_Time_Stamp]
    ,[Event_Name]
    SELECT
    CASE WHEN T.nt_username IS NULL OR LEN(T.nt_username) = 0 THEN t.ServerPrincipalName
    ELSE T.nt_username
    END
    ,T.DbName
    ,T.objectname
    ,T.clientappname
    ,t.ClientHostName
    ,T.server_instance_name
    ,T.sqltext
    ,T.Time_Stamp_EE
    ,T.eventname
    FROM
    #TEMP T
    /** -- RYelugu 03/06/2015 - Filters are now being applied directly while retrieving records from BUFFER or on XML
    -- Ryelugu 03/15/2015 - More filters are likely to be added on further testing
    WHERE ddl_Phase ='Commit'
    AND ObjectType <> 'STATISTICS' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - May be SQL Server Internally Creates Statistics for #Temp tables , we do not want Creation of STATISTICS Statement to be logged
    AND ObjectName NOT LIKE '%#%' -- Any stored proc which creates a temp table within it Extended Event does capture this creation statement SQL as well , we dont need it though
    AND T.Time_Stamp_EE >= @Prev_Insertion_time --Ryelugu 03/05/2015 - Performance Optimize
    AND NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM [dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log] MN
    WHERE MN.[ServerName] = T.server_instance_name -- Ryelugu Server Name needes to be added on to to xml ( Events in session )
    AND MN.[DbName] = T.DbName
    AND MN.[Event_Name] = T.EventName
    AND MN.[ObjectName]= T.ObjectName
    AND MN.[EE_Time_Stamp] = T.Time_Stamp_EE
    AND MN.[SQL_TEXT] =T.SqlText -- Ryelugu 03/05/2015 This is a comparision Metric as well , But needs to decide on
    -- Peformance Factor here , Will take advise from Lance if comparision on varchar(max) is a vital idea
    --SELECT GETDATE()
    --PRINT '4'
    --RETURN
    SELECT
    top 100
    [EE_Time_Stamp]
    ,[ServerName]
    ,[DbName]
    ,[Event_Name]
    ,[ObjectName]
    ,[UserName]
    ,[SQL_TEXT]
    ,[client_app_name]
    ,[Created_Date]
    ,[ClientHostName]
    FROM
    [dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log]
    ORDER BY [EE_Time_Stamp] desc
    -- select getdate()
    -- ** DELETE EVENTS after logging into Physical table
    -- NEED TO Identify if this @XML can be updated into physical system table such that previously loaded events are left untoched
    -- SET @XML.modify('delete /event/class/.[@timestamp="2015-03-06T13:01:19.020Z"]')
    -- SELECT @XML
    SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_5
    END
    GO
    Rajkumar Yelugu

    @@Version : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Microsoft SQL Server 2012 - 11.0.5058.0 (X64)
        May 14 2014 18:34:29
        Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation
        Developer Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.2 <X64> (Build 9200: ) (Hypervisor)
    (1 row(s) affected)
    Compatibility level is set to 110 .
    One of the limitation states - XML columns with a depth of more than 128 nested nodes
    How do i verify this ? Thanks .
    Rajkumar Yelugu

  • BIB-16633 Cannot connect because the database version is incompatible with

    BIB-16633 Cannot connect because the database version is incompatible with Feb 15, 2005 9:28 PM
    Reply
    why is this?
    oracle.dss.connection.common.ConnectionException: BIB-16633 Cannot connect because the database version is incompatible with this BI Beans version.
    at oracle.dss.connection.server.drivers.mdm.MDMConnectionDriverImpl.connect(MDMConnectionDriverImpl.java:147)
    at oracle.dss.connection.server.ConnectionImpl.connect(ConnectionImpl.java:285)
    at oracle.dss.connection.client.Connection.connect(Connection.java:425)
    at oracle.dss.connection.client.Connection.connect(Connection.java:342)
    at oracle.dss.addins.designer.OLAPSource.test(OLAPSource.java:284)
    at oracle.dss.addins.wizard.configFileEditor.OlapPanel.testConnection(OlapPanel.java:244)
    at oracle.dss.addins.wizard.configFileEditor.OlapPanel.btnTest_actionPerformed(OlapPanel.java:378)
    at oracle.dss.addins.wizard.configFileEditor.OlapPanel$3.actionPerformed(OlapPanel.java:120)
    at javax.swing.AbstractButton.fireActionPerformed(AbstractButton.java:1786)
    at javax.swing.AbstractButton$ForwardActionEvents.actionPerformed(AbstractButton.java:1839)
    at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.fireActionPerformed(DefaultButtonModel.java:420)
    at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.setPressed(DefaultButtonModel.java:258)
    at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicButtonListener.mouseReleased(BasicButtonListener.java:245)
    at java.awt.Component.processMouseEvent(Component.java:5100)
    at java.awt.Component.processEvent(Component.java:4897)
    at java.awt.Container.processEvent(Container.java:1569)
    at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:3615)
    at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:1627)
    at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:3477)
    at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.retargetMouseEvent(Container.java:3483)
    at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.processMouseEvent(Container.java:3198)
    at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.dispatchEvent(Container.java:3128)
    at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:1613)
    at java.awt.Window.dispatchEventImpl(Window.java:1606)
    at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:3477)
    at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:456)
    at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:201)
    at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:151)
    at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:141)
    at java.awt.Dialog$1.run(Dialog.java:540)
    at java.awt.Dialog.show(Dialog.java:561)
    at java.awt.Component.show(Component.java:1133)
    at java.awt.Component.setVisible(Component.java:1088)
    at oracle.bali.ewt.dialog.JEWTDialog.runDialog(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.dss.addins.wizard.configFileEditor.ConfigFileEditorWizard.run(ConfigFileEditorWizard.java:229)
    at oracle.dss.addins.designer.BIDesignerImpl.editConfigFile(BIDesignerImpl.java:1428)
    at oracle.dss.addins.designer.BIDesignerAddin.openBIDesignerSettings(BIDesignerAddin.java:990)
    at oracle.dss.addins.designer.BIDesignerAddin.actionPerformed(BIDesignerAddin.java:807)
    at javax.swing.AbstractButton.fireActionPerformed(AbstractButton.java:1786)
    at javax.swing.AbstractButton$ForwardActionEvents.actionPerformed(AbstractButton.java:1839)
    at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.fireActionPerformed(DefaultButtonModel.java:420)
    at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.setPressed(DefaultButtonModel.java:258)
    at javax.swing.AbstractButton.doClick(AbstractButton.java:289)
    at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicMenuItemUI.doClick(BasicMenuItemUI.java:1113)
    at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicMenuItemUI$MouseInputHandler.mouseReleased(BasicMenuItemUI.java:943)
    at java.awt.Component.processMouseEvent(Component.java:5100)
    at java.awt.Component.processEvent(Component.java:4897)
    at java.awt.Container.processEvent(Container.java:1569)
    at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:3615)
    at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:1627)
    at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:3477)
    at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.retargetMouseEvent(Container.java:3483)
    at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.processMouseEvent(Container.java:3198)
    at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.dispatchEvent(Container.java:3128)
    at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:1613)
    at java.awt.Window.dispatchEventImpl(Window.java:1606)
    at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:3477)
    at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:456)
    at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:201)
    at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:151)
    at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:145)
    at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:137)
    at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:100)
    Lisa Sherriff
    Posts: 137
    OTN Member Since: Jan, 2001
    Re: BIB-16633 Cannot connect because the database version is incompatible w ( In Reply To : BIB-16633 Cannot connect because the database version is incompatible with ) Feb 16, 2005 1:32 AM
    Reply
    Hi,
    From the 10.1.2 BI Beans Install Guide it says:
    OracleBI Beans supports data stored in Oracle9i Enterprise Edition or Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition. However, only particular releases and patchsets are supported:
    * Oracle9i Release 2 Enterprise Edition, as follows:
    o 9.2.0.6 for all platforms.
    o 9.2.0.5 with the latest OLAP patch for Windows-only.
    * Oracle Database 10g Release 1 Enterprise Edition with the latest OLAP patch.
    From the error message it would appear that the Database is not one of the above.
    Thanks,
    Lisa
    JDev QA
    401488
    Posts: 48
    OTN Member Since: Aug, 2002
    Re: BIB-16633 Cannot connect because the database version is incompatible with ( In Reply To : BIB-16633 Cannot connect because the database version is incompatible with ) Feb 18, 2005 8:01 PM
    Reply
    Hi,
    Please note that we have follwing versions of DB up and running:-
    1)Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.1.0.2.0 - Production
    With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
    2)Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.5.0 - Production
    With the Partitioning and Real Application Clusters options
    JServer Release 9.2.0.5.0 - Production
    Pls let us know the solution to resolve this problem ASAP.
    Thanks.

    You are not using a supported version of the database. BI Beans/OLAP only support the following database versions:
    10g - 10.1.0.3 with additional OLAP patch
    9i - 9205 with additional OLAP patch
    9i - 9206
    I would suggest that you have not applied all the required database patches to your instance.
    Hope this helps
    Business Intelligence Beans Product Management Team
    Oraclc Corporation

  • UDI-00018: Data Pump client is incompatible with database version 11.2.0.1

    Hi
    I am trying to import data in Oracle 11g Release2(11.2.0.1) using impdp utitlity and getting below errror
    UDI-00018: Data Pump client is incompatible with database version 11.2.0.1.0
    Export dump has taken in database with oracle 11g Release 1(11.1.0.7.0) and I am trying to import in higher version of the database. Is there any parameter I have to set to avoid this error?

    AUTHSTATE=compat
    A__z=! LOGNAME
    CLASSPATH=/app/oracle/11.2.0/jlib:.
    HOME=/home/oracle
    LANG=C
    LC__FASTMSG=true
    LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/app/oracle/11.2.0/lib:/app/oracle/11.2.0/network/lib:.
    LIBPATH=/app/oracle/11.2.0/JDK/JRE/BIN:/app/oracle/11.2.0/jdk/jre/bin/classic:/app/oracle/11.2.0/lib32
    LOCPATH=/usr/lib/nls/loc
    LOGIN=oracle
    LOGNAME=oracle
    MAIL=/usr/spool/mail/oracle
    MAILMSG=[YOU HAVE NEW MAIL]
    NLSPATH=/usr/lib/nls/msg/%L/%N:/usr/lib/nls/msg/%L/%N.cat
    NLS_DATE_FORMAT=DD-MON-RRRR HH24:MI:SS
    ODMDIR=/etc/objrepos
    ORACLE_BASE=/app/oracle
    ORACLE_HOME=/app/oracle/11.2.0
    ORACLE_SID=AMT6
    ORACLE_TERM=xterm
    ORA_NLS33=/app/oracle/11.2.0/nls/data
    PATH=/app/oracle/11.2.0/bin:.:/usr/bin:/etc:/usr/sbin:/usr/ucb:/home/oracle/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/sbin:.:/usr/local/bin:/usr/ccs/bin
    PS1=nbsud01[$PWD]:($ORACLE_SID)>
    PWD=/nbsiar/nbimp
    SHELL=/usr/bin/ksh
    SHLIB_PATH=/app/oracle/11.2.0/lib:/usr/lib
    TERM=xterm
    TZ=Europe/London
    USER=oracle
    _=/usr/bin/env

  • Proxy User - Forms 11.1.2 and Oracle Database (version 10.1.0.5) ??

    Hi,
    we are migrating from Forms 6i to 11.1.2. Our database version is very old (Enterprise Edition, version 10.1.0.5) because this is the latest version of the DB that Forms 6i runs, and we will migrating to 11g in phases. So 6i and 11g will co-exists for a while (accesing the same DB).
    I am trying to use proxy users feature to login to database.
    So I did this:
    - I created a user PROXY_USR to be the proxy user:
    SQL> create user PROXY_USR identified by PROXY_PASW;*
    - I grant create session for the user:
    SQL> grant create session to PROXY_USR;*
    - I changed the application users (eg APPUSER01), to connect via proxy user:
    SQL> alter user APPUSER01 grant connect through PROXY_USR;*
    The comand in Forms module to login is:
    +LOGON('PROXY_USR[APPUSER01]','PROXY_PASW@DB01');+*
    The logon built is being performed and the connection being made, without erros.
    But when I verify in what user the application is logged on, the result is not
    what was expected:
    I did the follwing PL/SQL inside Form module:
    begin*
    select user into v_user_DB from dual;*
    MESSAGE('User Connected: '||v_user_DB,ACKNOWLEDGE);*
    exception*
    when others then*
    MESSAGE('ERR: '||SQLERRM,ACKNOWLEDGE);*
    end;*
    The result from this select, is PROXY_USR and not APPUSER01 (that would be the correct):
    *>>Result: "User Connected: PROXY_USR"*
    Some more commands that were also performed inside Forms module:
    begin+
    select sys_context('userenv','current_user') v_current_usr from dual+
    MESSAGE('Current User: '||v_current_usr,ACKNOWLEDGE);+
    exception+
    when others then+
    MESSAGE('ERR: '||SQLERRM,ACKNOWLEDGE);+
    *>>Result: "User Connected: PROXY_USR"*
    begin+
    select sys_context('userenv','proxy_user') v_proxy_user from dual;+
    MESSAGE('Current User: '||v_proxy_user,ACKNOWLEDGE);+
    exception+
    when others then+
    MESSAGE('ERR: '||SQLERRM,ACKNOWLEDGE);+
    *>>Result: "Proxy User: "*
    OBS: when a connect via SQL*Plus, in a 11g database (Express), and run the commands above, the results are OK. The
    APPUSER01 is returned.
    Any ideas ?? I will open a SR in Metalink, but I think they will first request a database upgrade,
    which is not feasible for us at the moment ...
    Thanks in Advance.
    Franco

    Unfortunately besides trying on a certified combination (maybe use the Developer Database VM and import the required schemas for trial) and going through the documentation at http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E24269_01/doc.11120/e24477/sso.htm I can't offer more. I don't have a 10gR1 database anymore and also I don't have OID to play with.
    cheers

  • EXP-00037: Export views not compatible with database version

    kindly help with this error. We have already run catexp.sql but still that is not helping, we are still getting the same error.
    we are exporting 8i db.
    Export: Release 8.1.7.0.0 - Production on Thu Feb 21 14:34:25 2008
    (c) Copyright 2000 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
    Connected to: Oracle8i Enterprise Edition Release 8.1.7.0.0 - Production
    With the Partitioning option
    JServer Release 8.1.7.0.0 - Production
    EXP-00037: Export views not compatible with database version
    EXP-00000: Export terminated unsuccessfully

    Does this apply to you?
    Error: EXP 37
    Text: Export views not compatible with database version
    Cause: The Export utility is at a higher version than the database version
    and is thereby incompatible.
    Action: Use the same version of Export utility as the database.

  • Report takes long time in different database version

    Dear Mates,
    I have been in serious problem from last one month. Still i don't get any solution. Come to the problem.
    I have a program where, database version is *9i R2*. Here one report are base on a database function and works perfectly. It takes 30/35 seconds to preview.
    I take this schema backup by EXP command and import it to database version XE and also database version *10G R2* with IMP command. import is successful. Others report still preview as it is at 9i. But my mentioned reports didn't come as same. Now it takes 3 Hrs. :(.
    I run explain plan and the out put is bellow. What should i do now ? If you want to check the query i can also post it. If any one have experience regarding this, please help me.
    Plan hash value: 3745590339
    | Id  | Operation                      | Name        | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT               |             |  9454 |  1874K|   207  (55)| 00:00:03 |
    |   1 |  SORT GROUP BY                 |             |  9454 |  1874K|   207  (55)| 00:00:03 |
    |*  2 |   HASH JOIN                    |             |  9454 |  1874K|   205  (55)| 00:00:03 |
    |*  3 |    INDEX FAST FULL SCAN        | IND_AD_ID   |  9454 |   120K|   201  (55)| 00:00:03 |
    |   4 |    INLIST ITERATOR             |             |       |       |            |          |
    |   5 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACC_DTL     |  1351 |   250K|     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  6 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IND_AD_FLAG |     8 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       2 - access("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID"="ACC_DTL"."AD_ID")
       3 - filter("ACC_BALANCE"("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID",:UNIT,:PROJ)<>0)
       6 - access("ACC_DTL"."AD_FLAG"=6 OR "ACC_DTL"."AD_FLAG"=7 OR "ACC_DTL"."AD_FLAG"=8
                  OR "ACC_DTL"."AD_FLAG"=18 OR "ACC_DTL"."AD_FLAG"=19)
    Note
       - dynamic sampling used for this statementupper explain plan is from database 10g R2
    bellow r from 9i R2
    | Id  | Operation                      |  Name        | Rows  | Bytes | Cost  |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT               |              |       |       |       |
    |   1 |  SORT GROUP BY                 |              |       |       |       |
    |   2 |   CONCATENATION                |              |       |       |       |
    |   3 |    NESTED LOOPS                |              |       |       |       |
    |   4 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACC_DTL      |       |       |       |
    |*  5 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IND_AD_FLAG  |       |       |       |
    |*  6 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN           | IND_AD_ID    |       |       |       |
    |   7 |    NESTED LOOPS                |              |       |       |       |
    |   8 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACC_DTL      |       |       |       |
    |*  9 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IND_AD_FLAG  |       |       |       |
    |* 10 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN           | IND_AD_ID    |       |       |       |
    |  11 |    NESTED LOOPS                |              |       |       |       |
    |  12 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACC_DTL      |       |       |       |
    |* 13 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IND_AD_FLAG  |       |       |       |
    |* 14 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN           | IND_AD_ID    |       |       |       |
    |  15 |    NESTED LOOPS                |              |       |       |       |
    |  16 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACC_DTL      |       |       |       |
    |* 17 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IND_AD_FLAG  |       |       |       |
    |* 18 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN           | IND_AD_ID    |       |       |       |
    |  19 |    NESTED LOOPS                |              |       |       |       |
    |  20 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACC_DTL      |       |       |       |
    |* 21 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IND_AD_FLAG  |       |       |       |
    |* 22 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN           | IND_AD_ID    |       |       |       |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       5 - access("ACC_DTL"."AD_FLAG"=19)
       6 - access("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID"="ACC_DTL"."AD_ID")
           filter("ERP"."ACC_BALANCE"("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID",TO_NUMBER(:Z),TO_N
                  UMBER(:Z))<>0)
       9 - access("ACC_DTL"."AD_FLAG"=18)
      10 - access("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID"="ACC_DTL"."AD_ID")
           filter("ERP"."ACC_BALANCE"("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID",TO_NUMBER(:Z),TO_N
                  UMBER(:Z))<>0)
      13 - access("ACC_DTL"."AD_FLAG"=8)
      14 - access("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID"="ACC_DTL"."AD_ID")
           filter("ERP"."ACC_BALANCE"("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID",TO_NUMBER(:Z),TO_N
                  UMBER(:Z))<>0)
      17 - access("ACC_DTL"."AD_FLAG"=7)
      18 - access("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID"="ACC_DTL"."AD_ID")
           filter("ERP"."ACC_BALANCE"("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID",TO_NUMBER(:Z),TO_N
                  UMBER(:Z))<>0)
      21 - access("ACC_DTL"."AD_FLAG"=6)
      22 - access("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID"="ACC_DTL"."AD_ID")
           filter("ERP"."ACC_BALANCE"("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID",TO_NUMBER(:Z),TO_N
                  UMBER(:Z))<>0)
    Note: rule based optimizationEdited by: HamidHelal on Oct 12, 2011 6:42 PM

    yes..
    SELECT ALL ACC_LEDGER.LG_AD_ID, ACC_DTL.AD_NAME, abs(ACC_BALANCE(ACC_LEDGER.LG_AD_ID, :UNIT, :PROJ) )BAL,
    CASE WHEN ACC_BALANCE(ACC_LEDGER.LG_AD_ID, :UNIT, :PROJ)>0  AND ACC_DTL.AD_FLAG IN(6 ,18) THEN
                'RECEIVABLE'
               WHEN  ACC_BALANCE(ACC_LEDGER.LG_AD_ID, :UNIT, :PROJ)<0  AND ACC_DTL.AD_FLAG IN(6,18)  THEN
                'PAYABLE'
                 WHEN ACC_BALANCE(ACC_LEDGER.LG_AD_ID, :UNIT, :PROJ)>0  AND ACC_DTL.AD_FLAG IN(7,8,19)  THEN
                'PAYABLE'
                WHEN ACC_BALANCE(ACC_LEDGER.LG_AD_ID, :UNIT, :PROJ)<0  AND ACC_DTL.AD_FLAG IN(7,8,19)  THEN
                'RECEIVABLE'
                END AS BALANCE_TYPE,
    ACC_DTL.AD_CODE, ACC_DTL.AD_FLAG
    FROM ACC_DTL, ACC_LEDGER
    WHERE ACC_DTL.AD_FLAG IN (6, 7, 8,18,19)
    AND (ACC_LEDGER.LG_AD_ID = ACC_DTL.AD_ID)
    AND ACC_BALANCE(ACC_LEDGER.LG_AD_ID, :UNIT, :PROJ)<>0
    GROUP BY ACC_LEDGER.LG_AD_ID, ACC_DTL.AD_NAME, ACC_DTL.AD_CODE, ACC_DTL.AD_FLAG
    ORDER BY   ACC_DTL.AD_FLAG , ACC_DTL.AD_NAME;here ACC_BALANCE is the database function name..

  • Multiple database versions in a server

    Hi all,
    to day i have seen the file cat /etc/oratab like
    db1:/u01/app/oracle/product/8.x.x.x/db_1:Y
    db2:/u01/app/oracle/product/9.x.x.x/db_1:N
    db3:/u01/app/oracle/product/10.x.x.x/db_1:Y
    db4:/u01/app/oracle/product/8.x.x.x/db_1:N
    here my doubts is how we can install multiple oracle versions in a single server. a server will be having only one version of operating system. suppose like if we assume our os is linux 4.7 we can install only 10g and 11g. but how we can install 8i and 9i database versions.
    how all these oracle versions are going to be install in a single server.
    please clear my doubts.
    thanks a lot...!

    899329 wrote:
    Hi all,
    to day i have seen the file cat /etc/oratab like
    db1:/u01/app/oracle/product/8.x.x.x/db_1:Y
    db2:/u01/app/oracle/product/9.x.x.x/db_1:N
    db3:/u01/app/oracle/product/10.x.x.x/db_1:Y
    db4:/u01/app/oracle/product/8.x.x.x/db_1:N
    here my doubts is how we can install multiple oracle versions in a single server. a server will be having only one version of operating system. suppose like if we assume our os is linux 4.7 we can install only 10g and 11g. but how we can install 8i and 9i database versions.
    how all these oracle versions are going to be install in a single server.
    please clear my doubts.
    thanks a lot...!Each lives in its own ORACLE_HOME. If, as it seems from your comments, you have no problem with the concept of the 10g and 11g both on the same server, why should the addition of 8.x and 9.x be any different?

  • How can i check if a procedure exists in a certain database version

    So today i became really frustrated after noticing that the Oracle SQL version on some computer I needed to work on was 10.1. The problem with that was that I needed a procedure called "xmlserialize". I browsed the documentation for it, but I didn't see anything like "since 11.0" or something similar.
    So.. how can I see what is the first Oracle SQL version that supported some procedure?
    For example, when I check a class definition for Java, I consult the javadoc :
    http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/math/BigInteger.html
    and there there's a field called "Since". For BigInteger ( it's just an example ), it says "Since: JDK1.1", so I know that if I'm using a JDK version earlier that 1.1, I won't have that class.
    Is there some similar information for Oracle procedures/ functions/ features/ etc?

    >
    Let me be more explicit. I've searched for xmlserialize function.
    The only place on the website that holds information regarding this function is this page:
    >
    To paraphrase sybrand - that's utter nonsense. I have never found only one reference to anything on the web.
    Your question subject is
    >
    how can i check if a procedure exists in a certain database version
    >
    And since you said you were using 10.1 I searched for
    >
    oracle 10.1 xmlserialize
    >
    And the very first link on the search results is
    >
    What's New In Oracle XML DB?
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/appdev.102/b14259/whatsnew.htm
    >
    That link is for the XML Db Dev Guide for 10g Release 2
    Would you like to guess what you find if you search for xmlserialize?
    Right on the very first page is this
    >
    Oracle Database 10g Release 2 (10.2) New Features in Oracle XML DB
    SQL/XML Standard Compliance (SQL:2005 Standard Part 14)
    Support for the developing SQL/XML standard has been extended. The following SQL functions have been added: XMLPI, XMLComment, XMLRoot, XMLSerialize, XMLCDATA, and XMLParse. Escaping of identifiers has also been updated, in accordance with a change to the SQL/XML standard. See "Generating XML Using SQL Functions".
    >
    Did you notice the second sentence? I removed the clutter to make it easier to see.
    >
    The following SQL functions have been added: . . .XMLSerialize. . .
    >
    Fnding information can't get any easier than that.

  • Hi, I don't know how to find a specific security patch to apply to my Oracle database version to fix a vulnerability

    Hi, I don't know how to find a specific security patch to apply to my Oracle database version 11.2.0.2.0 (on windows server 2003 32 bits) to fix the following vulnerability:
    Risk: High
    Application: oracle_tnslsnr
    Port: 1521
    Protocol: tcp
    Synopsis:
    It is possible to register with a remote Oracle TNS listener.
    Description:
    The remote Oracle TNS listener allows service registration from a remote host. An attacker can exploit this issue to divert data from a
    legitimate database server or client to an attacker-specified system.
    Successful exploits will allow the attacker to manipulate database instances, potentially facilitating man-in-the-middle, sessionhijacking,
    or denial of service attacks on a legitimate database server.
    Solution:
    Apply the work-around in Oracle's advisory.
    Thank you for your help

    2835604 wrote:
    Hi, I don't know how to find a specific security patch to apply to my Oracle database version 11.2.0.2.0 (on windows server 2003 32 bits) to fix the following vulnerability:
    Risk: High
    Application: oracle_tnslsnr
    Port: 1521
    Protocol: tcp
    Synopsis:
    It is possible to register with a remote Oracle TNS listener.
    Description:
    The remote Oracle TNS listener allows service registration from a remote host. An attacker can exploit this issue to divert data from a
    legitimate database server or client to an attacker-specified system.
    Successful exploits will allow the attacker to manipulate database instances, potentially facilitating man-in-the-middle, sessionhijacking,
    or denial of service attacks on a legitimate database server.
    Solution:
    Apply the work-around in Oracle's advisory.
    Thank you for your help
    that sounds like the "tns poison" vulnerability.  CVE 2012-1675 - Oracle Security Alert CVE-2012-1675
    See MOS note 134083.1  and 1453883.1

  • Is there any incompatibility in using different JDBC and Oracle database versions?

    Hi everybody,
    I hope you can answer me ASAP.
    Which version of JDBC driver for Oracle could I use to access an Oracle database version 8.0.4.3.0 running on a SUN machine?
    Is it necessary to use the specific driver concerning to that version or could we use the JDBC version 8.1.6?
    If we decide to use JDBC 8.1.6 to work against the 8.0.4.3.0 database, will we find any incompatibility or problem?
    Thanks.
    null

    I don't know the answer to your question, but while looking for something else, I found a table listing "requirements and compatibilities for oracle jdbc drivers" that might answer your question:
    http://technet.oracle.com/docs/products/oracle8i/doc_library/817_doc/java.817/a83724/getsta1.htm#1008206
    (My aologies if that URL gets broken apart by this posting software and you have to piece it together.)
    Hope this helps.

  • How to find out Database version from SQLplus ?

    Which command do I have to type in sqlplus in order to get the underlying database version?

    SQL> conn /as sysdba
    Connected.
    SQL> select * from v$version;
    BANNER
    Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production
    PL/SQL Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production
    CORE 9.2.0.3.0 Production
    TNS for IBM/AIX RISC System/6000: Version 9.2.0.4.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 9.2.0.4.0 - Production
    SQL> select version from v$instance;
    VERSION
    9.2.0.4.0
    Regards,
    Sabdar Syed.
    null

  • Database Version number 9.2.6 or 9.2.0.6

    Can any one please tell me the detailed Database version numbers for Oracle 8i and Oracle 9i.
    is there any database version available with version number 9.2.6. but i think 9.2.0.6 is only available.
    what are all the patches required for upgrading oracle 8i to oracle 9.2.0.6

    Hi,<br>
    <br>
    To explain the Oracle Release Number, I advise you to read Oracle release<br>
    9.2.6. but i think 9.2.0.6 is only available<br>You're right, 9.2.6 doesn't exists. But 9.2.0.7 is available for some plateform.<br>
    And to migrate from 8i to 9i, you can directly migrate, but depend of 8i version. Read Upgrade Guide<br>
    <br>
    Nicolas.

  • Installing Discoverer with Database Version Oracle 10g Express Edition

    Hello,
    Is it possilbe to install Discoverer with database version Oracle 10g Express Edition? I have Oracle Fusion Middleware 11.1.1.1.0 on my Windows XP machine as well. If so, can someone please provide me a link to the Discoverer download.
    Regards,
    Kelly

    Note that the Personal Edition of the database is 'the most powerful' version, in that it contains all features and options of the Enterprise Edition (expect RAC and Enterprise Manager packs)
    As such, the Personal Edition, at a mere USD$400-500 is one of the most cost effective for-fee products that Oracle has in it's inventory. It is targeted at the developer. And it comes with the complete set of Sample Data, whereas XE has a very limited subset (since it does not support all functionality).
    Express Edition is indeed free, but it is not supported, and can not be patched. OTOH it does have a lighter footprint.
    Again, I am not sure whether Disco 11g is compatible with Express Edition. (It's on my schedule for December ...)

Maybe you are looking for

  • Mini DVI to HDMI problem, won't play DVD movie full screen on TV

    I use a mini-DVI port adapter with a DVI to HDMI cable to a 32" 1080p TV. When I play the DVD player screen on the TV and select full screen mode, the screen shifts back to macbook and displays full screen on the mac and the TV displays a black looki

  • How do I convert iMovie 9.x files in iMovie 11?

    A while back I upgraded to iMovie 10 and when I opened it it asked me to convert and upgrade my projects.  I chose to do so but it ran into an error after about the 10th project in my list of 15 projects.  So I created a folder called oldimovieprojec

  • DIR Authorization

    Hi gurus I have a problem about authorization in DMS. I have a DIR and it's authorized for a user, no one can change it except him. Then he need to send DIR by distribution and he want that only the users who receive this DIR can view/change it. The

  • A question on how to use OCIEnvCreate() function

    In the documentation it is suggested to invoke this function before any other OCI call and instead of the OCIInitialize(). This function also performs any process level initialization if required by any mode. However, OCITerminate() suggests that it

  • Listing first user on basis of time

    hi Sir/Madam, i am developing a Quiz and there is an entry question.if user answered that answer correct then the name,password and answer and TIme(what time he answered the question) is stored in text file shown below. I want to set this quiz on LAN