DBA_OBJECTS.CREATED is greater than DBA_OBJECTS.LAST_DDL_TIME

Hi,
I have executed the following query.
set linesize 150;
col object_type for a20;
col object_name for a30;
col LAST_DDL_TIME for a30;
select object_name,object_type,to_char(created,'MON-DD-YY HH:MM:SS') created,to_char(LAST_DDL_TIME,'MON-DD-YY HH:MM:SS') LAST_DDL_TIME
from dba_objects
where object_name in('WORKORDER', 'INVRESERVE', 'INVBALANCES', 'ITEM', 'WPITEM');
OBJECT_NAME OBJECT_TYPE CREATED LAST_DDL_TIME
WPITEM TABLE JAN-18-10 02:01:05 NOV-25-11 04:11:17
WORKORDER TABLE JAN-18-10 02:01:03 JAN-12-12 05:01:06
ITEM TABLE JAN-18-10 02:01:42 SEP-29-10 08:09:13
INVRESERVE TABLE JAN-18-10 02:01:42 JAN-12-12 05:01:23
INVBALANCES TABLE JAN-18-10 02:01:41 SEP-29-10 08:09:13
set linesize 150;
col object_type for a20;
col object_name for a30;
col LAST_DDL_TIME for a30;
select object_name,object_type,to_char(created,'MON-DD-YY HH:MM:SS') created,to_char(LAST_DDL_TIME,'MON-DD-YY HH:MM:SS') LAST_DDL_TIME
from dba_objects
where object_name in('SYNONYMDOM_NDX1', 'INVBAL_NDX1', 'ITEM_NDX1', 'WORKORDER_NDX1' , 'INVRESERVE_NDX3', 'INVRESERVE_NDX2');
OBJECT_NAME OBJECT_TYPE CREATED LAST_DDL_TIME
WORKORDER_NDX1 INDEX JAN-18-10 02:01:03 JAN-12-12 05:01:56
SYNONYMDOM_NDX1 INDEX JAN-18-10 02:01:59 JAN-18-10 02:01:59
ITEM_NDX1 INDEX JAN-18-10 02:01:42 JAN-18-10 02:01:42
INVRESERVE_NDX3 INDEX JAN-18-10 02:01:42 JAN-12-12 05:01:23
INVRESERVE_NDX2 INDEX JAN-18-10 02:01:42 JAN-18-10 02:01:42
INVBAL_NDX1 INDEX JAN-18-10 02:01:41 JAN-18-10 02:01:41
Some objects CREATED timestamp is > than LAST_DDL_TIME. Please help.
Regards,
Mat.
Edited by: user11278087 on Jan 19, 2012 1:28 AM
Please ignore this post. Timestamp is correct only. CREATED timestamp is < than LAST_DDL_TIME

Hi Mat,
What objects are you talking about? I can't see any object where the last_ddl_time is older than created.

Similar Messages

Any way to create tablespace with name greater than 30 characters ?

Is there any way to create tablespace greater than 30 characters on solaris 10 and Oracle 10g. Any way ? because i have no other option.

desc dba_tablespaces
So clearly the answer is NO.
Tablespace names are invisible and irrelevant. Why the question?

How to Create Purchase Order with Co Product greater than Consumption

Hi All,
I'm new to SAP. Can any one please help with the steps to create PO with Co Product greater than Consumption.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi Srinivasu,
If you are talking about handling by-products during subcontracting follow the following steps.
Create Purchase order with item category "L". In the components tab maintain by-product in negative quantity. If you are not sure about the actual quantity, enter theoretical quantity ( Actual quantity can be adjusted in Subsequent adjustment in Goods receipt).
Hope this helps you.
If this has not helped you, please elaborate your requirement.
Thanks
Vasuki B S

Create tablespace whose name length is greater than 50 ?

Can i create tablespace in oracle 10g whose name length is greater than 50 characters ?

Name tablespaces descriptively using a maximum of eight characters. Although Oracle Database tablespace names can be 30 characters long, portable UNIX filenames are restricted to 14 characters. The recommended standard for a datafile basename is tn.dbf, where t is a descriptive tablespace name and n is a two-digit string. Because the extension and the two-digit string take six characters, only eight characters remain for the tablespace name.
http://download.oracle.com/docs/html/B10811_05/app_ofa.htm

Need to create a workflow after Date Modified is greater than 7 days

I'm using SharePoint Deisnger 2010 and attempting to create a workflow to generate an email after the Date Modified is greater than 7 days. Checking to see if there is a way to create this workflow without creating a "calculated" field with a date.
Have:
If Current Item:Modified is greater than Today
But would like to have 7 days not today or a set date.
What's the best way to do this?

Hello,
In addition to Bistech, here is link to set date in WF context variable.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17082455/sharepoint-designer-2010-set-variable-today-x-days
Hemendra:Yesterday is just a memory,Tomorrow we may never see
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help

Rownum greater than query

Hi all,
first of all, what I am aware about...
I am aware about the fact, that ROWNUM filters, inside the query which is to be filtered by rownum, are incorrect. That is this is incorrect:
select * from <table> where rownum < 20;
Also I am aware, that the following will never return a result:
select * from <table> where rownum > 20;
That is clear. The correct version of the "less than" query is:
select * from (select * from <table> order by a) where rownum < 20;
Now the question: what does the last example still not work with "greater than" queries:
Take e.g. following example:
select * from (
select * from dba_objects order by object_name
) where rownum > 5
;

I ckeck it again. It's working for me !
Any way I'll quote it.
How ROWNUM Works
ROWNUM is a pseudocolumn (not a real column) that is available in a query. ROWNUM will be assigned the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, ... N, where N is the number of rows in the set ROWNUM is used with. A ROWNUM value is not assigned permanently to a row (this is a common misconception). A row in a table does not have a number; you cannot ask for row 5 from a table—there is no such thing.
Also confusing to many people is when a ROWNUM value is actually assigned. A ROWNUM value is assigned to a row after it passes the predicate phase of the query but before the query does any sorting or aggregation. Also, a ROWNUM value is incremented only after it is assigned, which is why the following query will never return a row:
select *
from t
where ROWNUM > 1;
Because ROWNUM > 1 is not true for the first row, ROWNUM does not advance to 2. Hence, no ROWNUM value ever gets to be greater than 1. Consider a query with this structure:
select ..., ROWNUM
from t
where <where clause>
group by <columns>
having <having clause>
order by <columns>;
Think of it as being processed in this order:
1. The FROM/WHERE clause goes first.
2. ROWNUM is assigned and incremented to each output row from the FROM/WHERE clause.
3. SELECT is applied.
4. GROUP BY is applied.
5. HAVING is applied.
6. ORDER BY is applied.
That is why a query in the following form is almost certainly an error:
select *
from emp
where ROWNUM <= 5
order by sal desc;
The intention was most likely to get the five highest-paid people—a top-N query. What the query will return is five random records (the first five the query happens to hit), sorted by salary. The procedural pseudocode for this query is as follows:
ROWNUM = 1
for x in
( select * from emp )
loop
exit when NOT(ROWNUM <= 5)
OUTPUT record to temp
ROWNUM = ROWNUM+1
end loop
SORT TEMP
It gets the first five records and then sorts them. A query with WHERE ROWNUM = 5 or WHERE ROWNUM > 5 doesn't make sense. This is because a ROWNUM value is assigned to a row during the predicate evaluation and gets incremented only after a row passes the WHERE clause.
Here is the correct version of this query:
select *
from
( select *
from emp
order by sal desc )
where ROWNUM <= 5;
This version will sort EMP by salary descending and then return the first five records it encounters (the top-five records). As you'll see in the top-N discussion coming up shortly, Oracle Database doesn't really sort the entire result set—it is smarter than that—but conceptually that is what takes place.

Query to select values greater than, where AS clause is used

Oracle 10g
Requesting your help in writing the query correctly.
I have the following 2 tables. The AddProjectPhase and AddProject tables. It is many to many relationship. Each project can have a predefined set of 4 different phases under it. Each phase has a start date and an end date. I am writing a report to get the phases which have a duration greater than, for example, 3 months.
The query below is working fine to just display the list of all the phases along with the duration of each phase. I am not able to modify it to select the phases which have a duration, for example, 3 or more months.
CREATE TABLE "ADDPROJECT"
   (     "VERSIONNO" NUMBER(*,0),
     "PROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJNAME" VARCHAR2(60),
     "PROJSTARTDATE" DATE,
     "PROJSTATUS" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJENDDATE" DATE,
     "PROJENDTYPE" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJENDREASON" VARCHAR2(1000),
     "UCPROJECTMANAGER" VARCHAR2(20),
     "FROMDATE" DATE,
     "TODATE" DATE,
     "SRCHFIELD" VARCHAR2(20),
     "OPERATOR" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PARENTPROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJHIDDENDATE" VARCHAR2(20),
      CONSTRAINT "PK_B36" PRIMARY KEY ("PROJID", "PROJHIDDENDATE") ENABLE
CREATE TABLE "ADDPROJECTPHASE"
   (     "VERSIONNO" NUMBER(*,0),
     "PROJPHASEID" NUMBER(9,0),
     "PHASESTARTDATE" DATE,
     "PHASEENDDATE" DATE,
     "RRDATE" DATE,
     "PHASENAME" VARCHAR2(30),
     "PROJPHASESTATUS" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
     "OPERATOR" VARCHAR2(20),
     "FROMDATE" DATE,
     "TODATE" DATE,
     "SRCHFIELD" VARCHAR2(20),
     "REVIEWCOMMENTS" VARCHAR2(1000),
     "PROJHIDDENDATE" VARCHAR2(20),
     "ISUEVALUATION" NUMBER(1,0),
     "SOLUTIONINGTEAMINVOLVEMENT" NUMBER(1,0),
     "ISUNAME" VARCHAR2(20),
      CONSTRAINT "PK_A63" PRIMARY KEY ("PROJPHASEID") ENABLE
   )Below is the query to display the list of all the phases along with the duration of each phase which is working fine.
SELECT pp.phaseName "phasename",
pp.phaseStartDate "phaseStartDate",
pp.phaseEndDate "phaseEndDate",
pp.projPhaseStatus "projPhaseStatus",
ap.projID "projID",
ap.projName "projName",
ap.projHiddenDate "projHiddenDate",
ap.projStartDate "projStartDate",
CASE
    WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL
    THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
    WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL
    THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
    ELSE null
END "phaseMonths"
FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
ORDER BY ap.projIDHowever the modified query shown below to select all the phases greater than, for example, 3 months, is resulting in
ORA-00904: "PHASEMONTHS": invalid identifier SELECT pp.phaseName, pp.phaseStartDate, pp.phaseEndDate
FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
AND PhaseMonths IN
(SELECT
(CASE
WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL
THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL
THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
ELSE null
END) AS PhaseMonths
FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate)
ORDER BY ap.projID

Looking for this?
select *
   from (
        SELECT pp.phaseName "phasename"
          , pp.phaseStartDate "phaseStartDate"
          , pp.phaseEndDate "phaseEndDate"
          , pp.projPhaseStatus "projPhaseStatus"
          , ap.projID "projID"
          , ap.projName "projName"
          , ap.projHiddenDate "projHiddenDate"
          , ap.projStartDate "projStartDate"
          , CASE WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
                 WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL     THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
                 ELSE null
            END "phaseMonths"
          FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
         WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
           AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
         ORDER
            BY ap.projID
where "phaseMonths" >= 3

Schedule line getting confirmed when Ordered Quanity is greater than stock.

Hi Sap Gurus,
We have an issue in one of the sales scenario.
In one of the sales orders the ordered quanity is purposely maintained greater than the stock at respective storage location(batch managed).
In this case the schedule line should not get confirmed and it should not allow delivery document creation.
But in the sales order the schedule lines are geeting confirmed and even the delivery document is getting created with picking request completion.
Could you please help to understand :
1. why the schedule lines are getting confirmed when ordered quantity > Inventory?
2. How do I stop delivery document creaton in this scenario?
Looking for a quick response.
Thanks in advance,
Bhaskar

Hello Bhaskar,
Is Availability Check in your system considering Replenishment Lead time, if yes, then this is possible.
Check this IMG Link:
IMG - Sales and Distribution - Basic Functions - Availability Check and Transfer of Requirements - Availability Check with ATP Logic or Against Planning - Carry Out Control For Availability Check
Here check the RLT settings.
Also check settings under In/Outward Movements, where things like include Purchase Order can lead to confirmation of stock in Sales Order, despite physical inventory being present.
Hope this helps,
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta

PO greater than Shopping Cart Qty

Friends,
We are working on extended classic scenario where PO is created as follow-on document from shopping cart. User can create PO in sourcing cockpit using Process PO option. However here user has the option to change PO qty where system accepts PO qty greater than SC qty. We would like to restrict it.
In R/3 MM we can control this via system message and restrict PO qty to exceed PR qty.
How can we control this functionality in SRM?
Regards,
Sandeep Parab

Hi. Try the BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI.
You should be able to check the quantities and issue an error if the quantity has been changed.
Regards,
Dave.

Formatting external drive for read/write PC/Mac & files greater than 4GB

I'm on Snow Leopard and deliver an external drive off-site to a video editor who needs to read/write to the drive and return the edited files and then I need to read/write all over again. All video files are greater than 4GB. How would I go about this? Third party applications like MacDrive create too much overhead when processing video files. FAT32 limits file sizes to 4GB.

Hi WillDuffy;
Your requirement of files greater than 4GB eliminates FAT.
In your case since you don't have access to the PC, I am afraid you are forced to use the NTFS. This will require you to use the reverse engineered effort called NTFS-3G to be able to write to the disk from your Mac. Sorry.
Allan
Message was edited by: Allan Eckert

CcBPM - switch with a condition (greater than) in XI 7.0

Hello.
I have this BPM that must have a switch condition like:
IF <field xpto> of the received message is greater than 0.
branch 1.
ELSE.
branch 2.
ENDIF.
In XI 7.1 is easy, because the condition editor has logical expressions like >, <, etc ...
In XI 7.0 we don't have that, but in SAP help I read:
You want to formulate the following condition: The booking number (BookingNumber) is greater than 0100.
Since the greater than (>) operator is not available in the condition editor, you can use the following solution: You define the relevant logical expression in the expression editor by means of an XPath predicate, and assign it to a node element. Using the condition editor you then just query the existence of this node element (by using the existence operator (EX)).
This means you first create the following expression in the expression editor:
/FlightBookingOrderConfirmation [BookingID/BookingNumber > 0100]
Using the condition editor, you then formulate the following condition:
(/FlightBookingOrderConfirmation [BookingID/BookingNumber > 0100] EX)
The meaning of this condition is as follows:
A node element FlightBookingOrderConfirmation exists, to which the following applies: The content of the subelement BookingID/BookingNumber is greater than 0100.
In my example, the xpath for the variable is:
/p4:EventMessage/p4:MessageBody/p5:Order/p5:Totals/p5:TotalGrossAmount
But i'm not getting how to use the bracket condition.
Regards,
Valter Oliveira.
Edited by: Valter Oliveira on Mar 10, 2009 6:04 PM

Hi, valter:
Existence operator (EX) is to check if the node exist in your source message or not.
It is used in Conditional Editor, mostly in the conditional routing in ID.
IF <field xpto> of the received message is greater than 0.
branch 1.
ELSE.
branch 2.
ENDIF.
If your branch 1 or 2 is a send step, then you can use the conditional routing to substitute BPM logic.
otherwise, you can not use conditon editor to replace your BPM logics.
Regards.
Liang

Increasing maximum number of Logical Processors in a Processor Group greater than the default (64)

Can the maximum number of Logical Processors allowed in a Processor Group be increased by Bcdedit command or registry key to a number greater than the default (64) to allow non-group-aware applications to seamlessly scale via multithreading across more cores
MSDN documents methods to reduce the max number of LP's in a Processor Group to 1 or any power of 2 less than 64 in order to increase the number of Processor Groups. But there is no discussion of how to increase the maximum number of Logical Processors
allowed in a Processor Group to a number greater than the default (64), e.g. to 128 or 256.
Since a non-group-aware application/process can only run on 1 Processor Group, increasing this limit is needed to allow non-group-aware multithreaded applications to scale seamlessly for parallel computation across more than 64 cores simultaneously on systems
with more than 64 cores (for example, a quad-socket Intel Xeon system with 24 cores per socket, including true and hyper cores). If that limit can be set via registry key or command line, or if there is another way to force all the cores on
all 4 sockets (4 NUMA nodes in this case) to join in 1 Processor Group, then non-group-aware applications will not need to be rewritten using group-aware thread-affinity APIs.

Hi John,
Are you trying to specify a static NUMA-node-to-group assignment, rather than letting Windows dynamically assign NUMA nodes to groups at boot time? If yes, You can refer the
following related KB:
How to manually configure K-Group assignment on multiprocessor machines
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2506384
Systems with fewer than 64 logical processors always have a single group, Group 0. On systems with 64 or fewer processors, existing applications will operate correctly without
modification. Applications that do not call any functions that use processor affinity masks or processor numbers will operate correctly on all systems, regardless of the number of processors. To operate correctly on systems with more than 64 logical processors,
the following kinds of applications might require modification:
•Applications that manage, maintain, or display per-processor information for the entire system must be modified to support more than 64 logical processors. An example of
such an application is Windows Task Manager, which displays the workload of each processor in the system.
•Applications for which performance is critical and that can scale efficiently beyond 64 logical processors must be modified to run on such systems. For example, database
applications might benefit from modifications.
•If an application uses a DLL that has per-processor data structures, and the DLL has not been modified to support more than 64 logical processors, all threads in the application
that call functions exported by the DLL must be assigned to the same group.
By design, a non-NUMA computer is considered to have one NUMA node. Because NUMA nodes cannot span groups, the system creates a node for each group after you restart the computer.
The related KB:
Processor Groups
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dd405503(v=vs.85).aspx
More information:
Uneven Windows Processor Groups
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/saponsqlserver/archive/2011/10/08/uneven-windows-processor-groups.aspx
Boot Parameters to Test Drivers for Multiple Processor Group Support
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff542298(v=vs.85).aspx
I’m glad to be of help to you!
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Post park ivoice M8079 'Reversal value greater than value invoiced to date'

I create a Service purchase order number is 8200000747 in our products system, and service entry sheet number is 1000026152, material document number is 5000306476.
When I create a park invoice reference this Service PO, the system can not clear GR/IR account with that service entry sheet(1000026152). When we want to post this park invoice, system generate message M8079 'Reversal value greater than value invoiced to date'. But, this item never been verification invoice , I can find this not cleared GR/IR data in MR11, this item not a multi account assignment , no foreign currency.
What happened? How can I carry out the correct GR/IR account data in park invoice?

Hello,
Instead of reversing the invoice try posting the Credit Memo through MIRO .
Regards
Mahesh

Amount to credit greater than credit balance - goods return to AP Cred Note

Hi All,
I've got the following scenario:
We have a AP Goods Return on the system which totals £12.94 with freight charges of -£3.75. We have copied this to a AP Credit Note, but have amended the freight from -£3.75 to -£3.00(UK VAT Rate 15% applicable throughout). The total credit field now shows £13.80 and the credit balance field shows £12.94. When you try to add the document it gives an error "amount to credit greater than credit balance". I'm using 2005A PL53.
Can anyone please advise the reason behind the error and also what the correct way of handling this kind of transaction would be?
Kind regards,
Matt

Hi Wesley,
I tried both methods and it doesn't resolve the issue. Spoke to SAP, they gave me a solution and workaround, the issue is a bit more complicated as what it may seem. You manually have to close the goods return, create a standalone service credit note with the appropriate GL account to reverse out the "goods clearing account" entry created by the reversal journal. The bahaviour has been changed in SBO 2007 and therefore the problem is not present in this version anymore. Thanks for your help anyway.
Kind regards,
Matt
Edited by: Greeff Matt on Jun 5, 2009 9:47 AM

Greater than or equal symbol not working

Hi,
I cannot get the "greater than or equal to" symbol to display properly. I can get the less than or equal symbol to display by typing Ctrl+q #, and then formatting it as Symbol font.
According to the Character_Sets.pdf FrameMaker Online reference, the greaterequal symbol is Ctrl+q 3, but when I format it as Symbol, FrameMaker displays a box (which looks to me to be a non-printing character).
Any suggestions on how I get a "greater than or equal to" symbol to display?
Thanks,
John B.
FrameMaker 8 (8.0 p277)
Windows XP SP 3

Error7103 wrote:
> I cannot get the "greater than or equal to" symbol to display properly.
Try this...
Click in margin.
Format > Characters > Designer...
Character Tag: [ Symbol ]
Family: [ Symbol ]
all else As Is or blank
Commands: New Format...
[*] Store in Catalog
Click in Body Flow A.
Special > Variable...
[Create Variable]
Name: [ char.symbol.greaterequal ]
Definition: [ <Symbol>\xb3 ]
[Add]
[Done]
[Insert]
Advantages:
Avoid frequent arcane typing: you only need to look up the special character entry sequence once per document (if that - we keep these var defs in a separate catalog for ease of application).
Isolates special char encodings for dealing with eventual replacement by native Unicode glyphs and/or ports to platforms lacking legacy Symbol overlay font
Isolates special char renderings for possible changes to font with native >= glyph
Assures text inserted adjacent to symbol will be in native paragraph font, and not Symbol.
Prevents spell checker from needlessly complaining.
Is portable between FM platforms and releases, although \xb3 does appear as Š (cap s caron above) in Windows dialogs.
Disadvantages:
If you apply a Default ¶ Font to the para, the variable is no longer in Symbol font (but this is always the case for variables that use alternate fonts). You have to re-select the var (which may be hard to even see), and re-insert it.
If you highlight the entire para, or just the text containing the var, and apply a new PgfTag, the variable likewise gets de-fonted. It has ever been thus.
You have to search by Variable, and not by special character.
So what do we suppose made this topic so popular that it's got over 1000 Views so far?
I tried these instructions with great anticipation, but alas, it did not work for me.
Maybe it works differently on FrameMaker 9. I even tried making a PDF to see if it just rendered differently on the screen, since you mentioned the display in Windows dialog boxes (even though I was just in the main flow).
See the screenshot below for my results.

DBA_OBJECTS.CREATED is greater than DBA_OBJECTS.LAST_DDL_TIME

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for