Decimal Value for Percentage distribution on Account Assignement in SES

Dear Experts,
While creating service entry, the qty should be distributed on percentage basis for Account assignment with decimal value.
For Example
Say Service 100% done but value is 10,000..but there is distribution to different cost center say K, L , M, N
K - 21.25% - value 2125
L - 32.70% - value 3270
M - 28.93% - value 2893
N - 17.22% - value 1722
So i need to customize decimal values for Percentage distribution for Service entry sheet creation. Please advice me, if you know the solution for this
Regards
Saravanan

Hi
In Transaction CUNI, as lot is a created Unit of measure wuth no dimensions select No Dimensions & continue
Now change the decimal places for the Unit from3 to 5.
In the service entry sheet you will be able to maintain the lot upto 5 decimals....
But there is again aproblem in that as the standard field Quantity MENGE has only 3 decimal places allowed, so agian you will encounter a problem.
So the best method to follow is advise the user to go for a 3 decimal reounding off the work.
Hope you understand the Problems that arise when decimal places are changed we need to take a lot of things into considertaion before going forward
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Similar Messages

Decimal Place for Percentage

Hi,
Where do we change the number of decimal places for percentage? Currently it is set as 3places. (e.g. 1.234% change to 1.2345%)
Thanks,

Hi Shiva,
As for the link you gave, we don't want to change the currency decimal place. We only want to change the number of decimals shown in a percentage value. (such 1.2345% instead of 1.234%)
Thanks,

Define G/L Account for Product Category and Account Assignment Category

Hello Experts,
I got a requirment to make a new entry in below SPRO path.
Define G/L Account for Product Category and Account Assignment Category
*Individual entries cannot be put into the change request*
*Message no. SV141*
*Diagnosis*
*For technical reasons, the entries cannot be fully specified in the change request. There are two possible reasons for this:*
*1. The key of an entry is longer than 120 characters. All entries whose keys match up to character 119, are then copied into the change request, rather than an individual entry.*
*2. The key of an entry contains fields of special data types, for example, packed numbers. The key can only be specified in the change request up to the first such field from the left.*
*all entries whose keys match up to character 26 are copied into the change request, rather than a single entry.*
*System Response*
*The selected entry is copied into the change request correctly, but other entries may be copied as well.*
My question is, If I make one entry and move to Quality and production system will it move only one entry or whole table will move?
Kindly help me.
Thanking you
Regards
Sharan

I got the same message trying to make an entry in SPRO:
Define Backend System for Product Category
I found the note 305942 describing exactly the issue for my and above mentioned entry, which offers the correction, then the note 326802 which offers the correction of the first notes. However, both notes are for Releases 4.6C and D (from 2000), and we are using EHP2 FOR SAP SRM 7.0.
I see another discussions in SCN regarding this topic, but haven't found real solution yet. Any hints? At least the answer to previous question from Sharan would be appreciated.
Best regards,
Toni

Decimal values for EA in MIGO

Dear Experts
Recently we have upgraded to SAP AFS 6.5 from SAP AFS 5.0. In previous version we could GR (using MIGO) decimal values for unit of measure EA. Now when we are trying to perform goods receipt decimal values it is automatically rounding off to an integer.
After go live we got an issue which is similar like this and it was corrected after consulting SAP OSS. check the this; Rounding off in MIGO- Error
I have checked settings in CUNI in previous and current versions. There is no change. Decimal places are zero. Please suggest if you have any idea on this.
Regards
Jeewana

Hi,
Please check whether all the correction instructions mentioned in the note: 1971912
are implemented correctly. If its already maintained correctly, then you may directly raise an OSS ticket to SAP.
Also refer the similar notes: 1893043 - Decimal places not allowed in MIGO for movement type 561
1932640 - Incorrect rounding in asset PO with no material.
Regards,
AKPT

Invoice verification for blanket PO with account assignment category U (un

Hi all
While doing miro when i am doing invoice verification for blanket PO with account assignment category U (unknown) system is not allowing me to enter the GL it is disable,wat can be the possible reason
Regards
shailesh

Hi Shailesh,
As you have maintained the account assignment category as U the account assignment tab will not be available. If you want to enter a GL account then use the Account assignments K or F or X.
Else if you want to use U in PO then you can give the GL account and other account assignment details only in the Invoice verification.
Regards,
Kathir

Changing the Decimal places for Percentage in cost distribution in SC

Hi Gurus,
Is it possible to change the number decimal places for the Percentage field in cost Assignment tab in Shopping cart in cost distribution option?
The user wants 3 decimal places, currently we can enter only 2 decimal places.
I have gone thro' couple of blogs which are talking about changing the price decimal and not the percentage field decimal. (in IMG setting: General settings > Currencies > Set Decimal places)
So, if anyone come acorss this issue, please let me know.
Thanks and Regards,
Nowsath

Decimal Places Factor of the Receiver Weighting Factors
Specifies the number of valid decimal places with which the given weighting factors are valuated.
Example
You enter 123456 as the weighting factor. Depending on the factor, this number is interpreted as:
Factor Decimal places Weighting factor
1 0 123456
10 1 12345.6
100 2 1234.56
1000 3 123.456
10000 4 12.3456
100000 5 1.23456
1000000 6 0.123456
Please check with your FICO consulant .what settings you have in backend system.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/bb/bdbdc4575911d189240000e8323d3a/frameset.htm
Muthu

Profit center for purchase order without account assignment

I've requirement to include profit centers in purchase orders without account assignment category.
The trouble is when there is no profit center maintained in material master.
Is there a way to determine profit center in purchase order for such cases?

Dear Abinash,
Define substitution in GGB1 at line item level as shown below:
Prerequisite : BSEG-WERKS = Maintain plant
Substitution : BSEG-PRCTR = maintain profit centre as constant value
After define it, assign to the co.code.
Regards,
Mukthar

LIV for Purchase Orders with Account Assignment

Hi SAP Gurus,
I would like to get your expert advice on this...
I enabled total based invoice acceptance and reduction by performing the required configuration steps (define vendor tolerance group, set up the auto invoice reduction tolerance checks, assigned the tolerance group to the vendor). I was assuming that this would work for my purchase order which contains an account assignment. However, when I tested it out, instead of behaving as expected (create invoice and credit memo for the excess value), the system generated only 1 accounting document. The price variance was posted back to the account assignment assigned to the PO item.
Did I miss out on any steps? or is this the way SAP treats account assigned (non-stock) PO items (i.e. no invoice reduction occurs). If so, can you explain to me why?
Best regards,
RiVeR
Edited by: delo celo on Jul 14, 2010 6:16 PM

Hi Delo,
Please find answers to your queries below in bold.
1. I was just wondering why would SAP allow such transaction/s to happen? Wouldn't it compromise the integrity of the whole document trail (PO account assignment is different from the LIV)? -
There could be some business scenarios in some organisations, where in Procurement team uses generic cost centre (header), which is specific to particular department or group, to procure. But at the time of Invoice Receipt, AP team knows exact cost centre or order, etc to post the amounts. To cover these kind of scenarios, SAP probably has provided the option to change acount assignment.
2. Is there a way to edit the Account Assignment for a Purchase Order line item even if that item has been fully received and invoiced? -
These field changes at various levels can be configured via t-code OME9.
a) IR Changeable - This field if selected will allow to change the account assignment of a purchase order item at the time of invoice receipt.
b) Acct. assg. changeable - This field is selected will allow to change account assignment for an item following goods receipt or invoice receipt.
Hope this clarifies your queries.
-Ravi

GR for purchase order with Account assignment E

Hello All
I am having a scenario where in the BOM structure is as under: A->B->C--->D, D is the raw material, C is the component produced in-house, B is the material which we procure through subcontracting, in the material master of C SPK:30 is used for subcontracting, & A is in-house produced material with purely MTO scenario (20 - strategy).
Once the sales order of A is there we run MRP for it, as per the master data settings described above we get purchase requisition for D & when I convert it to purchase order it is having account assignment as E.
This is all well but the moment I try to save it, system throws an error stating: 'G/L account 20500100 cannot be used (please correct)". This G/L account is of raw material itself.
Can you please guide me to overcome this problem.
I am looking forward to listen from you soon.
Regards,
J K Tharwani

Hi
Check the OBYC settings for this transaction, assign the correct G/L for this transaction. Try to get the help from MM consultant to resolve this.
Check in BSX Transaction for the invetroy posting.
Check the G/L account it is exist for your company code.
Take the G/L account which is coming in the error message and go to FS00 t code select tab Create/blank/interest , there you will have field status group just double click on that . It will take you to field status group display in that check the combination of the selection.
Thanks
S.Murali
Edited by: S. Murali on Jun 26, 2009 5:07 PM
Edited by: S. Murali on Jun 26, 2009 5:19 PM

GR going to wrong GL account for PO Item with Account Assignment Category M

Hi Experts,
I need some help on GR posting for PO Item with M as AAC.
PO1 for material ABC with M as Account Assignment Category, when I book GR for this Item, the GL document generated as below.
Dr: PRD (Cost Price Differences)
Cr: WRX (GR/IR)
The material ABC price control is "S" and already have standard cost.
For another material DEF which have ascetically same master data as ABC and got a similar PO2 with M as Account Assignment Category.
But the GR document as below.
Dr: BSX (Inventory)
Cr: WRX (GR/IR)
How can be one same setting got so different results, is there any data in Material or PO make these differences?
Actually the results for material DEF is what we want, how could I avoid the GR results for material ABC.
Thanks~

Thanks you Mukthar,
I have checked all the information and porcess for both material and did a lot of testing in testing system.
Here is what I found.
Case
Material ABC SO: 1111 PO: 6666 (ACC:M)
Material DEF SO:2222 PO: 7777(ACC:M)
All the information in material mast data, SO, PO are the same.
The differences is that:
PO:6666 post GR before Material ABC's standard price release. So the first GR document as below
Dr: PRD (Cost Price Differences)
Cr: WRX (GR/IR)
This is correct document without material stand cost.
The problem we reverse the fist GR document, release standard cost for Material ABC. Then re-do the GR. but the GL document still book into PRD instead of BSX.
If I create a new SO:3333 and PO:8888 (with ACC M) for material ABC now.
The GR could be book into BSX.
It seem like once the PO got GR with 0 standard cost, even I relesed a new price for the material and re do the GR, it still take the previous 0 cost to book inventory which make all the amount into PRD.
Quite Strange

Inline style - decimal value for dimension break designer

Hi all.
I'm using JDeveloper 11.1.2.1 & ADF.
Just to let you know that decimal value in dimension css selectors (like width...) added using inline style break UI designer.
af:tree table -> nodeStamp facet -> column -> inlineStyle -> width:305.0px break UI designer.
Replacing 305.0px with 305px makes everything work Ok.
.0 part in inline style was added by JDeveloper 11.1.1.5, while JDeveloper 11.1.2.1 doesn't add decimal part.
Regards.

Frank, this is i minor issue but it took me 1hour to find what breaks UI designer.
What I did is just migrated adf application from JDeveloper 11.1.1.5 to 11.1.2.1.
In JDeveloper 11.1.1.5, when you enter width using property inspector -> style -> layout -> dimension -> width property, let say 305 and select pixel in side drop down list, what you get as result is inlineStyle property like this:
inlineStyle="width:305.0px"
Frank Nimphius wrote:How would 305.2 pixel look like ?You should ask Oracle to answer this question.
Thank you for your reply.

Defining G/L Account for product category and account assignment category

We are using the standard configuration to default in a G/L account for a given product category and account assignment category combination. This works well for us when it comes to the shopping transactions (i.e. BBPSC01, BBPSC02, etc.), however we have a problem with this logic in the carry out sourcing transction BBPSOCO01. Our users are creating describe requirements which are then delivered to BBPSOCO01, however the user is not assigning the correct product category, so the sourcing department updates the cart with the correct product category. Upon doing so, the G/L account gets changed to whatever the V_BBP_DET_ACCT table determines is correct for that given product category/account assignment combination. We would like to know if their is a way to not fire the "default G/L account determination" when the shopping cart is changed in transaction BBPSOCO01. I already know about the BBP_DETERMINE_ACCT BADI but thought there might be a less expensive alternative. Our business treats the G/L account provided by the configuration as a guideline, therefore when the buyer changes the product category they also want to retain the account assignment information. Any suggesstions on how this might be accomplished outside of creating my own logic in the BADI?
Best regards,
Shawn O'Connor

I got the same message trying to make an entry in SPRO:
Define Backend System for Product Category
I found the note 305942 describing exactly the issue for my and above mentioned entry, which offers the correction, then the note 326802 which offers the correction of the first notes. However, both notes are for Releases 4.6C and D (from 2000), and we are using EHP2 FOR SAP SRM 7.0.
I see another discussions in SCN regarding this topic, but haven't found real solution yet. Any hints? At least the answer to previous question from Sharan would be appreciated.
Best regards,
Toni

Need table name for Output Types and Account Assignment Types

Hi
pl let me know the table name for
1. Account Assignment Type
2. Output Types (All)
I need to download some company code specific data for both
Pl confirm
Warm Regards
Vikcy

Hi Thanks for reply
You mean to say that Account Assignment Types = Account Assignment Category ????
Secondly In Table NAST, i can not see field "Output Type"
Pl confirm once which field give me company code specific "Output Type" data
Regards
Vicky

Table Control Variant For ME21N - Item level - account assignment tab.

Dear All,
I want to change Table Control Screen that is in Me21n(Service PO)>Item level> Account Assignment tab -> Table control.
In that table control i want to add one column Name is OrderNo(AUFNR) ,but system is not changing the table control.
When i m going to change table control scrren in ---> Condition tab its working fine but not for above case.
Please guide me to solve this issue.
Regards,
Sanket.

Please provide the solution.
Regards,
Sanket.

Release Strategies for PR with Characteristics Account assignment

Dear All,
Please let me know how to set rel.strategy for PR with Account assignment as a characteristics.
I tried with Account assignment and Document type as a characteristics but Rel.stst is not triggering.
Please help.
Thank you
regards
Amar

Hi,
I have created Charac A/c assigment with fied name KNTTP ,maintained the vaue as A and also assined to class. And other characteristics used are plant and docment type.
But REL STAT is not triggering.
Please suggest some input.
Thanks in advance
Amar

Decimal Value for Percentage distribution on Account Assignement in SES

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for