Default active maintenance plan in oracle 11g ?
Hi all,
I have a question about database resource manager.
As i know Oracle11g automatically use the Default_maintenance_plan in the Scheduler window MAINTENANCE_WINDOW_GROUP. And the default CPU resource allocation for SYS account (SYS_GROUP) is 75% (level1).
I open 3 separated terminals and run the below command with from SYS account concurrently:
select count(*) from all_objects, all_objects, all_objects;
Using top (linux) command to watch the CPU and hope it will raise to 75%, but it just raise up to nearly 50% (around). WHY CPU NOT RAISE to 75% ?
in 10g, it will.
Thanks.
Maximum CPU Utilization Limit
Resource Manager provides a new directive called MAX_UTILIZATION_LIMIT that allows you to place a hard limit on the amount of CPU utilized by a consumer group.
The MAX_UTILIZATION_LIMIT directive is useful for limiting the CPU utilization of low priority workloads. This directive is also useful for providing more consistent performance for the workload in a consumer group, and it helps to build systems where end users experience consistent response times for each database operation.
refer:-Oracle Database Administrator's Guide for details
source:-http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e17128/chapter1_2.htm
Similar Messages
-
Changing a cycle in an active maintenance plan
Hello All,
I received a request from an end user to make a change to an active maintenance plan. The plan has a 3mo cycle. The users would like to first, generate a call for March 2011 and second, to change this to a an annual cycle. I am able to use the 'Restart in Cycle' to generate a call in March, unfortunately, I am not able to figure out how to change the cycle from 3mo to 12mo. Is it possible for to change the plan cycle from 3mo to 12mo once the plan is started? The header section in IP10 is grayed out.
At the moment, it looks as though I need to create a new maintenance plan to accommodate the request.
Thanks in advance.
AnnaMahee,
Appreciate your quick response. This was a strategy plan and I was able to make the changes as you had suggested, through the task list.
Thank you so much for your help!
-Anna
Edited by: Anna Vuong on Feb 24, 2011 10:08 PM -
What are the privileges required for explain plan in Oracle 11g database
I am facing the problem in doing a explain plan for a view in Oracle 11g database. When I select from the view like this:
select * from zonewisearpu
It does a select on the view but when I give explain plan like
explain plan for
select * from zonewisearpu
I get the error like insufficient privileges.
Please let me know if things are getting missed out as I guess system level privileges are required to execute this.
I hope, my question is clear.
It’s a humble request to revert urgently if possible as I need to complete a task and do not know the way out.
Regards975148 wrote:
Thanks for your reply. I have found out that an explain plan is possible on the user's own objects and is not possible on the granted objects from a different schema. For eg, if I do a explain plan on a view querying on tables from a different view, it would not allow the explain plan to proceed. This could mean that explain plan needs different privileges than just a select.
Requesting for a revert to this.
Here is a simple test case that I have perfomed
SQL> create user test1 identified by test1;
User created.
SQL> create user test2 identified by test1;
User created.
SQL> grant connect, resource to test1,test2;
Grant succeeded.
SQL> create table test1.tab1 as select * from v$session;
Table created.
SQL> connect test2/test1
Conencted.
SQL> show user
USER is "TEST2"
SQL>
SQL> explain plan for
2 select sid,serial#,status,username from test1.tab1 where username<> '';
Explained.
SQL>
So, as can be seen I am able to do a explain plan from user test2 for tables belong to user test1.
As far as privileges are concerned, following is the list
SQL> select * from dba_role_privs where grantee in ('TEST1','TEST2') order by 1;
GRANTEE GRANTED_ROLE ADM DEF
TEST1 CONNECT NO YES
TEST1 RESOURCE NO YES
TEST2 CONNECT NO YES
TEST2 RESOURCE NO YES
SQL>
SQL> select grantee,owner,table_name,privilege from dba_tab_privs where grantee in ('TEST1','TEST2') order by 1;
GRANTEE OWNER TABLE_NAME PRIVILEGE
TEST2 TEST1 TAB1 SELECT
SQL>
SQL> select * from dba_sys_privs where grantee in ('TEST1','TEST2') order by 1;
GRANTEE PRIVILEGE ADM
TEST1 UNLIMITED TABLESPACE NO
TEST2 UNLIMITED TABLESPACE NO
SQL> -
Order Type default on Maintenance Plan
Hi gurus,
How can i do a default value of order type ZPM02 on IP42
Thank you!!You can set the default order type by planning plant as follows:
IMG
- Plant Maintenance and Customer Service
-- Maintenance and Service Processing
--- Maintenance and Service Orders
Functions and Settings for Order Types
-Define Default Order Types for Maintenance Items
PeteA -
Looking for Active Data Guard in Oracle 11g Release 2 References
I want to reach out to customers who have implemented Active Data Guard in production (preferably 11.2), so that we can develop some
customer references that in turn will benefit other customers. The customers who get selected for such references may further be selected to publish their case study directly in oracle.com and/or invited as a customer co-speaker in the upcoming Oracle OpenWorld at San Francisco (Sep 19-23, 2010). Being a customer co-speaker at OOW means they get a free pass to the full conference (regular price for that is $1795-$2495).
Please send any follow-ups to [email protected]
Thank you.
Larry M. Carpenter
Oracle Data Guard & MAA Product ManagerHi Larry,
This is Bhavik Desai Oracle -DBA@Amazon. I do have couple of Active Standby running on 11gR2 On RHEL 5 64-Bit platform.
Most of the databases are reporting on (DSS Having 2-4 TB in size) having FSFO configured.
It would be a pleasure if i can provide any benchmarking to you on this.
Regards,
Bhavik Desai -
Urgent : ORA-01426: numeric overflow on oracle 11g Active Data Guard
Hi
I have configured Active Data Guard on oracle 11g, for reporting purpose we will select mutliple querry on target side(10 users). we are getting 'numeric overflow erro'r on alert log file When we issuing multiple query on target side. PLeae let me know is this error will cause performance degrad. if it will degrade performance mean please tell me how to resolve this problem. Why the numeric overflow is comming . and it is not comming in the primary database, it is comming in standby database only. please any one help it is very urgent
is there any parameter To overcome this problme
Please please it is very important to me and very urgent .
Thanks
nafees
Edited by: Nafees on Jan 1, 2009 3:44 AM
Edited by: Nafees on Jan 1, 2009 3:54 AMThere is no one drowning.
Your house is not on fire.
The volcano has not exploded.
Please apologize for abusing this forum by claiming your issue is more urgent than other people's requests.
Then, and only then, should anyone help you. I know I certainly won't until I read your sincere apology and promise not to be abusive in the future. -
Dear experts,
I face a problem that system get main work center from equipment master data as a default main work center in maintenance plan when creating maintenance plan. however, if main work center in equipment is changed later, the change will not synchronize to related maintenance plan. if work order is generated from maintenance plan, main work order in order is defaulted from maintenance plan instead of updated work center in equipment.
another problem is that, for those orders generated by maintenance plan, the work centers in operations is defaulted from task list in maintenance plan. in most case, work center in task list is dummy. Actually the work is done by work center in equipment master data.
My expectation is how to auto replace the main work center and work center of operations in work order with the one in equipment master data if order is generated by maintenance plan? is there any standard configuration or enhancement/BADi that can help with this requirement?
thanks！
WesleyWesley,
Sorry - development is the only way.
Another option is to create a batch program that runs before your IP30 run(s) and updates any maintenance items and task lists with the correct work centres.
PeteA -
Active session Spike on Oracle RAC 11G R2 on HP UX
Dear Experts,
We need urgent help please, as we are facing very low performance in production database.
We are having oracle 11G RAC on HP Unix environment. Following is the ADDM report. Kindly check and please help me to figure it out the issue and resolve it at earliest.
---------Instance 1---------------
ADDM Report for Task 'TASK_36650'
Analysis Period
AWR snapshot range from 11634 to 11636.
Time period starts at 21-JUL-13 07.00.03 PM
Time period ends at 21-JUL-13 09.00.49 PM
Analysis Target
Database 'MCMSDRAC' with DB ID 2894940361.
Database version 11.2.0.1.0.
ADDM performed an analysis of instance mcmsdrac1, numbered 1 and hosted at
mcmsdbl1.
Activity During the Analysis Period
Total database time was 38466 seconds.
The average number of active sessions was 5.31.
Summary of Findings
Description Active Sessions Recommendations
Percent of Activity
1 CPU Usage 1.44 | 27.08 1
2 Interconnect Latency .07 | 1.33 1
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Findings and Recommendations
Finding 1: CPU Usage
Impact is 1.44 active sessions, 27.08% of total activity.
Host CPU was a bottleneck and the instance was consuming 99% of the host CPU.
All wait times will be inflated by wait for CPU.
Host CPU consumption was 99%.
Recommendation 1: Host Configuration
Estimated benefit is 1.44 active sessions, 27.08% of total activity.
Action
Consider adding more CPUs to the host or adding instances serving the
database on other hosts.
Action
Session CPU consumption was throttled by the Oracle Resource Manager.
Consider revising the resource plan that was active during the analysis
period.
Finding 2: Interconnect Latency
Impact is .07 active sessions, 1.33% of total activity.
Higher than expected latency of the cluster interconnect was responsible for
significant database time on this instance.
The instance was consuming 110 kilo bits per second of interconnect bandwidth.
20% of this interconnect bandwidth was used for global cache messaging, 21%
for parallel query messaging and 7% for database lock management.
The average latency for 8K interconnect messages was 42153 microseconds.
The instance is using the private interconnect device "lan2" with IP address
172.16.200.71 and source "Oracle Cluster Repository".
The device "lan2" was used for 100% of interconnect traffic and experienced 0
send or receive errors during the analysis period.
Recommendation 1: Host Configuration
Estimated benefit is .07 active sessions, 1.33% of total activity.
Action
Investigate cause of high network interconnect latency between database
instances. Oracle's recommended solution is to use a high speed
dedicated network.
Action
Check the configuration of the cluster interconnect. Check OS setup like
adapter setting, firmware and driver release. Check that the OS's socket
receive buffers are large enough to store an entire multiblock read. The
value of parameter "db_file_multiblock_read_count" may be decreased as a
workaround.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Additional Information
Miscellaneous Information
Wait class "Application" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "Cluster" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "Commit" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "Concurrency" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "Configuration" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "Network" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "User I/O" was not consuming significant database time.
Session connect and disconnect calls were not consuming significant database
time.
Hard parsing of SQL statements was not consuming significant database time.
The database's maintenance windows were active during 100% of the analysis
period.
----------------Instance 2 --------------------
ADDM Report for Task 'TASK_36652'
Analysis Period
AWR snapshot range from 11634 to 11636.
Time period starts at 21-JUL-13 07.00.03 PM
Time period ends at 21-JUL-13 09.00.49 PM
Analysis Target
Database 'MCMSDRAC' with DB ID 2894940361.
Database version 11.2.0.1.0.
ADDM performed an analysis of instance mcmsdrac2, numbered 2 and hosted at
mcmsdbl2.
Activity During the Analysis Period
Total database time was 2898 seconds.
The average number of active sessions was .4.
Summary of Findings
Description Active Sessions Recommendations
Percent of Activity
1 Top SQL Statements .11 | 27.65 5
2 Interconnect Latency .1 | 24.15 1
3 Shared Pool Latches .09 | 22.42 1
4 PL/SQL Execution .06 | 14.39 2
5 Unusual "Other" Wait Event .03 | 8.73 4
6 Unusual "Other" Wait Event .03 | 6.42 3
7 Unusual "Other" Wait Event .03 | 6.29 6
8 Hard Parse .02 | 5.5 0
9 Soft Parse .02 | 3.86 2
10 Unusual "Other" Wait Event .01 | 3.75 4
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Findings and Recommendations
Finding 1: Top SQL Statements
Impact is .11 active sessions, 27.65% of total activity.
SQL statements consuming significant database time were found. These
statements offer a good opportunity for performance improvement.
Recommendation 1: SQL Tuning
Estimated benefit is .05 active sessions, 12.88% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the PL/SQL statement with SQL_ID "d1s02myktu19h" for
possible performance improvements. You can supplement the information
given here with an ASH report for this SQL_ID.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID d1s02myktu19h.
begin dbms_utility.validate(:1,:2,:3,:4); end;
Rationale
The SQL Tuning Advisor cannot operate on PL/SQL statements.
Rationale
Database time for this SQL was divided as follows: 13% for SQL
execution, 2% for parsing, 85% for PL/SQL execution and 0% for Java
execution.
Rationale
SQL statement with SQL_ID "d1s02myktu19h" was executed 48 times and had
an average elapsed time of 7 seconds.
Rationale
Waiting for event "library cache pin" in wait class "Concurrency"
accounted for 70% of the database time spent in processing the SQL
statement with SQL_ID "d1s02myktu19h".
Rationale
Top level calls to execute the PL/SQL statement with SQL_ID
"63wt8yna5umd6" are responsible for 100% of the database time spent on
the PL/SQL statement with SQL_ID "d1s02myktu19h".
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID 63wt8yna5umd6.
begin DBMS_UTILITY.COMPILE_SCHEMA( 'TPAUSER', FALSE ); end;
Recommendation 2: SQL Tuning
Estimated benefit is .02 active sessions, 4.55% of total activity.
Action
Run SQL Tuning Advisor on the SELECT statement with SQL_ID
"fk3bh3t41101x".
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID fk3bh3t41101x.
SELECT MEM.MEMBER_CODE ,MEM.E_NAME,Pol.Policy_no
,pol.date_from,pol.date_to,POL.E_NAME,MEM.SEX,(SYSDATE-MEM.BIRTH_DATE
) AGE,POL.SCHEME_NO FROM TPAUSER.MEMBERS MEM,TPAUSER.POLICY POL WHERE
POL.QUOTATION_NO=MEM.QUOTATION_NO AND POL.BRANCH_CODE=MEM.BRANCH_CODE
and endt_no=(select max(endt_no) from tpauser.members mm where
mm.member_code=mem.member_code AND mm.QUOTATION_NO=MEM.QUOTATION_NO)
and member_code like '%' || nvl(:1,null) ||'%' ORDER BY MEMBER_CODE
Rationale
The SQL spent 92% of its database time on CPU, I/O and Cluster waits.
This part of database time may be improved by the SQL Tuning Advisor.
Rationale
Database time for this SQL was divided as follows: 100% for SQL
execution, 0% for parsing, 0% for PL/SQL execution and 0% for Java
execution.
Rationale
SQL statement with SQL_ID "fk3bh3t41101x" was executed 14 times and had
an average elapsed time of 4.9 seconds.
Rationale
At least one execution of the statement ran in parallel.
Recommendation 3: SQL Tuning
Estimated benefit is .02 active sessions, 3.79% of total activity.
Action
Run SQL Tuning Advisor on the SELECT statement with SQL_ID
"7mhjbjg9ntqf5".
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID 7mhjbjg9ntqf5.
SELECT SUM(CNT) FROM (SELECT COUNT(PROC_CODE) CNT FROM
TPAUSER.TORBINY_PROCEDURE WHERE BRANCH_CODE = :B6 AND QUOTATION_NO =
:B5 AND CLASS_NO = :B4 AND OPTION_NO = :B3 AND PR_EFFECTIVE_DATE<=
:B2 AND PROC_CODE = :B1 UNION SELECT COUNT(MED_CODE) CNT FROM
TPAUSER.TORBINY_MEDICINE WHERE BRANCH_CODE = :B6 AND QUOTATION_NO =
:B5 AND CLASS_NO = :B4 AND OPTION_NO = :B3 AND M_EFFECTIVE_DATE<= :B2
AND MED_CODE = :B1 UNION SELECT COUNT(LAB_CODE) CNT FROM
TPAUSER.TORBINY_LAB WHERE BRANCH_CODE = :B6 AND QUOTATION_NO = :B5
AND CLASS_NO = :B4 AND OPTION_NO = :B3 AND L_EFFECTIVE_DATE<= :B2 AND
LAB_CODE = :B1 )
Rationale
The SQL spent 100% of its database time on CPU, I/O and Cluster waits.
This part of database time may be improved by the SQL Tuning Advisor.
Rationale
Database time for this SQL was divided as follows: 0% for SQL execution,
0% for parsing, 100% for PL/SQL execution and 0% for Java execution.
Rationale
SQL statement with SQL_ID "7mhjbjg9ntqf5" was executed 31 times and had
an average elapsed time of 3.4 seconds.
Rationale
Top level calls to execute the SELECT statement with SQL_ID
"a11nzdnd91gsg" are responsible for 100% of the database time spent on
the SELECT statement with SQL_ID "7mhjbjg9ntqf5".
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID a11nzdnd91gsg.
SELECT POLICY_NO,SCHEME_NO FROM TPAUSER.POLICY WHERE QUOTATION_NO
=:B1
Recommendation 4: SQL Tuning
Estimated benefit is .01 active sessions, 3.03% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the SELECT statement with SQL_ID "4uqs4jt7aca5s" for
possible performance improvements. You can supplement the information
given here with an ASH report for this SQL_ID.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID 4uqs4jt7aca5s.
SELECT DISTINCT USER_ID FROM GV$SESSION, USERS WHERE UPPER (USERNAME)
= UPPER (USER_ID) AND USERS.APPROVAL_CLAIM='VC' AND USER_ID=:B1
Rationale
The SQL spent only 0% of its database time on CPU, I/O and Cluster
waits. Therefore, the SQL Tuning Advisor is not applicable in this case.
Look at performance data for the SQL to find potential improvements.
Rationale
Database time for this SQL was divided as follows: 100% for SQL
execution, 0% for parsing, 0% for PL/SQL execution and 0% for Java
execution.
Rationale
SQL statement with SQL_ID "4uqs4jt7aca5s" was executed 261 times and had
an average elapsed time of 0.35 seconds.
Rationale
At least one execution of the statement ran in parallel.
Rationale
Top level calls to execute the PL/SQL statement with SQL_ID
"91vt043t78460" are responsible for 100% of the database time spent on
the SELECT statement with SQL_ID "4uqs4jt7aca5s".
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID 91vt043t78460.
begin TPAUSER.RECEIVE_NEW_FAX_APRROVAL(:V00001,:V00002,:V00003,:V0000
4); end;
Recommendation 5: SQL Tuning
Estimated benefit is .01 active sessions, 3.03% of total activity.
Action
Run SQL Tuning Advisor on the SELECT statement with SQL_ID
"7kt28fkc0yn5f".
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID 7kt28fkc0yn5f.
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM TPAUSER.APPROVAL_MASTER WHERE APPROVAL_STATUS IS
NULL AND (UPPER(CODED) = UPPER(:B1 ) OR UPPER(PROCESSED_BY) =
UPPER(:B1 ))
Rationale
The SQL spent 100% of its database time on CPU, I/O and Cluster waits.
This part of database time may be improved by the SQL Tuning Advisor.
Rationale
Database time for this SQL was divided as follows: 100% for SQL
execution, 0% for parsing, 0% for PL/SQL execution and 0% for Java
execution.
Rationale
SQL statement with SQL_ID "7kt28fkc0yn5f" was executed 1034 times and
had an average elapsed time of 0.063 seconds.
Rationale
Top level calls to execute the PL/SQL statement with SQL_ID
"91vt043t78460" are responsible for 100% of the database time spent on
the SELECT statement with SQL_ID "7kt28fkc0yn5f".
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID 91vt043t78460.
begin TPAUSER.RECEIVE_NEW_FAX_APRROVAL(:V00001,:V00002,:V00003,:V0000
4); end;
Finding 2: Interconnect Latency
Impact is .1 active sessions, 24.15% of total activity.
Higher than expected latency of the cluster interconnect was responsible for
significant database time on this instance.
The instance was consuming 128 kilo bits per second of interconnect bandwidth.
17% of this interconnect bandwidth was used for global cache messaging, 6% for
parallel query messaging and 8% for database lock management.
The average latency for 8K interconnect messages was 41863 microseconds.
The instance is using the private interconnect device "lan2" with IP address
172.16.200.72 and source "Oracle Cluster Repository".
The device "lan2" was used for 100% of interconnect traffic and experienced 0
send or receive errors during the analysis period.
Recommendation 1: Host Configuration
Estimated benefit is .1 active sessions, 24.15% of total activity.
Action
Investigate cause of high network interconnect latency between database
instances. Oracle's recommended solution is to use a high speed
dedicated network.
Action
Check the configuration of the cluster interconnect. Check OS setup like
adapter setting, firmware and driver release. Check that the OS's socket
receive buffers are large enough to store an entire multiblock read. The
value of parameter "db_file_multiblock_read_count" may be decreased as a
workaround.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Inter-instance messaging was consuming significant database time on this
instance.
Impact is .06 active sessions, 14.23% of total activity.
Wait class "Cluster" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .06 active sessions, 14.23% of total activity.
Finding 3: Shared Pool Latches
Impact is .09 active sessions, 22.42% of total activity.
Contention for latches related to the shared pool was consuming significant
database time.
Waits for "library cache lock" amounted to 5% of database time.
Waits for "library cache pin" amounted to 17% of database time.
Recommendation 1: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is .09 active sessions, 22.42% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the cause for latch contention using the given blocking
sessions or modules.
Rationale
The session with ID 17 and serial number 15595 in instance number 1 was
the blocking session responsible for 34% of this recommendation's
benefit.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .1 active sessions, 24.96% of total activity.
Finding 4: PL/SQL Execution
Impact is .06 active sessions, 14.39% of total activity.
PL/SQL execution consumed significant database time.
Recommendation 1: SQL Tuning
Estimated benefit is .05 active sessions, 12.5% of total activity.
Action
Tune the entry point PL/SQL "SYS.DBMS_UTILITY.COMPILE_SCHEMA" of type
"PACKAGE" and ID 6019. Refer to the PL/SQL documentation for addition
information.
Rationale
318 seconds spent in executing PL/SQL "SYS.DBMS_UTILITY.VALIDATE#2" of
type "PACKAGE" and ID 6019.
Recommendation 2: SQL Tuning
Estimated benefit is .01 active sessions, 1.89% of total activity.
Action
Tune the entry point PL/SQL
"SYSMAN.EMD_MAINTENANCE.EXECUTE_EM_DBMS_JOB_PROCS" of type "PACKAGE" and
ID 68654. Refer to the PL/SQL documentation for addition information.
Finding 5: Unusual "Other" Wait Event
Impact is .03 active sessions, 8.73% of total activity.
Wait event "DFS lock handle" in wait class "Other" was consuming significant
database time.
Recommendation 1: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is .03 active sessions, 8.73% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the cause for high "DFS lock handle" waits. Refer to
Oracle's "Database Reference" for the description of this wait event.
Recommendation 2: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is .03 active sessions, 8.27% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the cause for high "DFS lock handle" waits in Service
"mcmsdrac".
Recommendation 3: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is .02 active sessions, 5.05% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the cause for high "DFS lock handle" waits in Module "TOAD
9.7.2.5".
Recommendation 4: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is .01 active sessions, 3.21% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the cause for high "DFS lock handle" waits in Module
"toad.exe".
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "Other" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .15 active sessions, 38.29% of total activity.
Finding 6: Unusual "Other" Wait Event
Impact is .03 active sessions, 6.42% of total activity.
Wait event "reliable message" in wait class "Other" was consuming significant
database time.
Recommendation 1: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is .03 active sessions, 6.42% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the cause for high "reliable message" waits. Refer to
Oracle's "Database Reference" for the description of this wait event.
Recommendation 2: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is .03 active sessions, 6.42% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the cause for high "reliable message" waits in Service
"mcmsdrac".
Recommendation 3: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is .02 active sessions, 4.13% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the cause for high "reliable message" waits in Module "TOAD
9.7.2.5".
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "Other" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .15 active sessions, 38.29% of total activity.
Finding 7: Unusual "Other" Wait Event
Impact is .03 active sessions, 6.29% of total activity.
Wait event "enq: PS - contention" in wait class "Other" was consuming
significant database time.
Recommendation 1: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is .03 active sessions, 6.29% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the cause for high "enq: PS - contention" waits. Refer to
Oracle's "Database Reference" for the description of this wait event.
Recommendation 2: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is .02 active sessions, 6.02% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the cause for high "enq: PS - contention" waits in Service
"mcmsdrac".
Recommendation 3: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is .02 active sessions, 4.93% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the cause for high "enq: PS - contention" waits with
P1,P2,P3 ("name|mode, instance, slave ID") values "1347616774", "1" and
"3599" respectively.
Recommendation 4: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is .01 active sessions, 2.74% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the cause for high "enq: PS - contention" waits in Module
"Inbox Reader_92.exe".
Recommendation 5: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is .01 active sessions, 2.74% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the cause for high "enq: PS - contention" waits in Module
"TOAD 9.7.2.5".
Recommendation 6: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is .01 active sessions, 1.37% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the cause for high "enq: PS - contention" waits with
P1,P2,P3 ("name|mode, instance, slave ID") values "1347616774", "1" and
"3598" respectively.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "Other" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .15 active sessions, 38.29% of total activity.
Finding 8: Hard Parse
Impact is .02 active sessions, 5.5% of total activity.
Hard parsing of SQL statements was consuming significant database time.
Hard parses due to cursor environment mismatch were not consuming significant
database time.
Hard parsing SQL statements that encountered parse errors was not consuming
significant database time.
Hard parses due to literal usage and cursor invalidation were not consuming
significant database time.
The Oracle instance memory (SGA and PGA) was adequately sized.
No recommendations are available.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Contention for latches related to the shared pool was consuming
significant database time.
Impact is .09 active sessions, 22.42% of total activity.
Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .1 active sessions, 24.96% of total activity.
Finding 9: Soft Parse
Impact is .02 active sessions, 3.86% of total activity.
Soft parsing of SQL statements was consuming significant database time.
Recommendation 1: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is .02 active sessions, 3.86% of total activity.
Action
Investigate application logic to keep open the frequently used cursors.
Note that cursors are closed by both cursor close calls and session
disconnects.
Recommendation 2: Database Configuration
Estimated benefit is .02 active sessions, 3.86% of total activity.
Action
Consider increasing the session cursor cache size by increasing the
value of parameter "session_cached_cursors".
Rationale
The value of parameter "session_cached_cursors" was "100" during the
analysis period.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Contention for latches related to the shared pool was consuming
significant database time.
Impact is .09 active sessions, 22.42% of total activity.
Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .1 active sessions, 24.96% of total activity.
Finding 10: Unusual "Other" Wait Event
Impact is .01 active sessions, 3.75% of total activity.
Wait event "IPC send completion sync" in wait class "Other" was consuming
significant database time.
Recommendation 1: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is .01 active sessions, 3.75% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the cause for high "IPC send completion sync" waits. Refer
to Oracle's "Database Reference" for the description of this wait event.
Recommendation 2: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is .01 active sessions, 3.75% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the cause for high "IPC send completion sync" waits with P1
("send count") value "1".
Recommendation 3: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is .01 active sessions, 2.59% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the cause for high "IPC send completion sync" waits in
Service "mcmsdrac".
Recommendation 4: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is .01 active sessions, 1.73% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the cause for high "IPC send completion sync" waits in
Module "TOAD 9.7.2.5".
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "Other" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .15 active sessions, 38.29% of total activity.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Additional Information
Miscellaneous Information
Wait class "Application" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "Commit" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "Configuration" was not consuming significant database time.
CPU was not a bottleneck for the instance.
Wait class "Network" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "User I/O" was not consuming significant database time.
Session connect and disconnect calls were not consuming significant database
time.
The database's maintenance windows were active during 100% of the analysis
period.
Please help.Hello experts...
Please do the needful... It's really very urgent.
Thanks,
Syed -
Active x controls in oracle forms 11g
I have read a post regarding, the embeding of active x controls in oracle forms. Can anybody explain it in detail, tat how it can be done on Oracle forms 11g. My database is also 11g. And please explain how to draw activex control on canvas, coz i cant find any icon related to it on tool palette. please help me...
Regards
VibinVibin,
Welcome to Oracle Forums!
Please acquaint yourself with the FAQ and forum etiquette if you have not already done so.
>
I have read a post regarding, the embeding of active x controls in oracle forms.
>
You must have read some post of a client-server version of Forms. It is always better to post the link that you are referring to
Can anybody explain it in detail, tat how it can be done on Oracle forms 11g. My database is also 11g. And please explain how to draw activex control on canvas, coz i cant find any icon related to it on tool palette. please help me...In web forms you use (Java) Beans.
Cheers, -
In oracle 11g , which is default server
i am creating oracle 11g database using responsefile . could you please let me know which is the default server in oracle11g . either dedicated or shared server .
841731 wrote:
and also can plese let me know , how i will check if my db is running dedicated or shared server .Then you still didn't understand Pierre's response.
The database doesn't run in "dedicated" or "shared" mode. It just runs. Clients request a "dedicated" or "shared" connection. The reason they are referred to as shared or dedicated "servers" is NOT a reference to the database. When a client connects to a database instance, that connection is via a "server" process. That process is separate and apart from the db instance. If the client requested a dedicated server (connection) then the listener creates that dedicated server process at the time of the request, the server process deals only with that one client connection, and it terminates when the client dis-connects.
If the client requested a 'shared server', then the listener sets up the connection through a "dispatcher". Like the dedicated server, the dispatcher is separate and apart from the database instance. But unlike the dedicated server, it may pre-exist prior to any specific client connection request, it services multiple client connections, and it survives the disconnect of any one client.
The database instance itself always supports "dedicated server", and may, if configured properly, support "shared server".
I leave it to you to re-visit the Concepts Manual for further details. -
Oracle 11g Active Data Guard and SAP R3
Hi All,
I have a query regarding Oracle 11g Active Data Guard and SAP R3.
Does the Oracle 11g R1/R2 Active Data guard feature supported with SAP R3?
I appreciate your help to provide any link or document for the same.
Thanks,
VihangI have a query regarding Oracle 11g Active Data Guard and SAP R3.
Does the Oracle 11g R1/R2 Active Data guard feature supported with SAP R3?
I appreciate your help to provide any link or document for the same.
Oracle database 11g functionality certified by SAP, check below link
http://www.oracle.com/us/solutions/sap/oradb11g-article-upd-1-323074.pdf
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/ias/downloads/osb-11gr1certmatrix.xls -
Oracle 11g Express Edition with Default Apex 4
Hi,
I recently installed Oracle 11g Express Edition, It came by default with apex 4 installed in it, I did not install apex in my system since it already had apex 4 in build.
Next I created a schema and tried to import some of the application developed in apex 4, But i am getting this below error.
>>1 error has occurredNOT COMPATIBLE (Your export may contain calls not supported by your application version.)
Kindly please suggest me do i need to install apex again in the system or what is the alternative method to make application install.
Thanks
SudhirDownload the latest APEX version and upgrade.
Regards
Nico -
Table name to display status for maintenance plan with active /inactive status
i need status table which display only active/inactive status of the maintenance plan.
really it helps me ..........
thanks raymond
regards,
priya -
Planning to purchase Oracle 11g Standard One Edition
I am planning to purchase Oracle 11g Standard One Edition at the same time I have some following questions.
Plat form
Server with
Dual CPU Inter Core 2 Quada
4 GB RAM
500 GB HDD
Windows 2003
2 MBPS Broadband
40 Clients
*18 Locations*
Inter Core 2 Due
2 GB RAM
2 MBPS Broadband
All clients should be connected to server over the internet with VB 6.0 and VB.Net 2005 both the applications.
This is possible?I am planning to purchase Oracle 11g Standard One Edition at the same time I have some following questions.
Plat form
Server with
Dual CPU Inter Core 2 Quada
4 GB RAM
500 GB HDD
Windows 2003
2 MBPS Broadband
40 Clients
*18 Locations*
Inter Core 2 Due
2 GB RAM
2 MBPS Broadband
All clients should be connected to server over the internet with VB 6.0 and VB.Net 2005 both the applications.
This is possible? -
Oracle 11g Active Data Guard是怎么收费的?
原来在Oracle 10g中，DG是免费使用的，想请问一下，在Oracle 11g中，性能得到加强的ADG是怎么收费的？谢谢
FYI
Use customary EE Option License Practices
Active Data Guard license required if using either Real-time Query or RMAN block-change tracking on a standby
Example with primary and 5 separate standby databases
S1 = physical - real-time query
S2 = physical - real-time query + RMAN block change tracking
S3 = physical - RMAN block change tracking
S4 = physical - neither real-time query nor RMAN block change tracking
S5 = logical
Active Data Guard must be licensed for primary and for S1, S2 and S3.
Active Data Guard is not relevant to logical standby
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi I;m having so itunes match issues. I ran itunes match. I';ve since foumd, I think: a) if incorrect genre etc data has been uploaded to icloud, I cannot find how to delete it and reupload correct song and data. I am presently assuming that once son
-
PC shuts off when Ipod Touch is connected. Detects "Digital Still Camera"
My Ipod Touch was working fine until today. I plugged it into my PC and then it detects it as a "digital still camera". Then after a few seconds my PC will completely shut down. The weird thing is that once it restarts with the Ipod connected already
-
Hello, Ok. This is aggravating, I just spent ten minutes writing a message, clicked post and it was all lost, saying I needed to log in. I am logged in. Gah! scratch that, now I'm on my THIRD try Here's the summary: Installed vers. X, text became b
-
Problem on getting output in Double quotes in XSD?
hi friends, I have an issue on Transform activity. When we concat three elements of source side to target side element. Then the result of target side element will be displayed in double Quotes. Hope any one can help to solve this issue. Thanks in Ad
-
Adjust JTable column width according to content
'morning all, How can I resize each column's width according with the content ? I mean, i'd like to show all the content of my cells, neither clipped nor with leading space. Can something help me, please ? Bye bye by Dhavide - we will, forever -