Default Rule Set

How can I get a copy of the most recent default rule set?

You can download it in any support pack in VIRCC folder --> CC_rules.zip.
The delivered rule set is in the CC_rules.zip file
Ankur
SAP GRC RIG

Similar Messages

GRC 10: Default Rule sets

Hi All.
i am wondering whether we have default rule set for GRC10 as we found with GRC 5.3. Where do I find them in GRC 10 software download?
rEgards,
Faisal

In GRC10 default rule set are available by BCset :
GRAC_RA_RULESET_COMMON
GRAC_RA_RULESET_JDE
GRAC_RA_RULESET_ORACLE
GRAC_RA_RULESET_PSOFT
GRAC_RA_RULESET_SAP_APO
GRAC_RA_RULESET_SAP_BASIS
GRAC_RA_RULESET_SAP_CRM
GRAC_RA_RULESET_SAP_ECCS
GRAC_RA_RULESET_SAP_HR
GRAC_RA_RULESET_SAP_NHR
GRAC_RA_RULESET_SAP_R3
GRAC_RA_RULESET_SAP_SRM

GRC Rule Set Updates

Where can I fund updates made to the default rule set?

http://service.sap.com/support
Click on the Help & Support tab --> Search for SAP Notes.
You will need a valid S-number to log in.
Thanks!
Ankur
SAP GRC RIG

Compliance Calibrator Default Rules Upload Files

I'm implementing Compliance Calibrator 5.1, and I'm at the point where I need to upload the default rule-set. However, I cannot locate the flat files required for the initial rule-set upload (i.e. business process, function, and risk definitions). I've read through the user guides, but they don't seem to reference exact file names or specify where the files would be located after install. Thanks in advance for your help.

Varun,
you may get a quicker answer to your question in the GRC forum
Governance, Risk and Compliance (SAP GRC)

Ebusiness tax Rule setup - Set default rule button is disabled

Hi All
In ebusiness tax rule setup - Tax rule default values are not able to set. I cannot able to access the set default.
set default value is disabled. can anyone help me know , how i can enabled button set default value in
Tax Rules
Thanks
Venkatesan

Pl ensure that you have defined all required default values set up. Ex Tax, Tax Status, Tax Jurisdiction, Tax Rate etc.

Setting default ruler units

I am trying to use indesign cs6 for the first time. I started by watching the video tutorial (ten things beginners should know) on adobe TV. already I've run into a problem.
in the tutorial the guy sets up a new document and the preset for margins on the create new document page is in inches. this is what i would like mine to be. however, my default is set in points/picas. I read a discussion thread in this forum saying to go into preferences>units of measurement in order to change the default to inches. I did that. problem solved!
except...when I go to create a new document the menu has reverted back to points/picas. I've tried a number of times, quiting the program, etc. It will not change the presets, which quite defeats their purpose. Is this a glitch? advice?
thanks!

Make sure you have no open documents and the set the units to inches.
Bob

I have messages in mail that are color-coded as if by a rule, but I have no rules set. How can I correct this?

The only rule that I ever had in Mail was the default one that color coded messages from Apple blue. I notice that some messages are color-coded brown and I have no rules set at al (hence no rule to turn off.) Some of the messages are related to viewing online magazine, but not all. How can I stop this?

Hi. Thanks for your message.
Well, I understand what you are trying to say but I thought it was easier to categorize in Apple Mail.
On Entourage I just click twice on a sender address, record it on Address book and give it a colour that I previously defined as "Work", "Personal", "Customers", "Suppliers", "Friends" or whatever.
As Apple Mail don't have Address Book as part of it but an outside feature it's very annoying. Of course I am used to use a software and I don't expect now Apple Mail do everything as Entourage but... as someone said it seems Apple Mail stopped in time. The recent version seems the first one ever issued. I hate the way Mail.app handles attachments by placing big chunky previews right in my email. I prefer them to be named attachments listed somewhere else, out of the content of my email. I don't if I can change this via terminal commands? Can you tell me if that is possible?
I don't understand why Apple Mail have lots of plugins instead of a great improvment from the backstage.
I use Apple computers since ever and I love this machines but sometimes I don't understand this lake of improvments.
Take a look at this link:
http://scottworldblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/microsoft-entourage-vs-apple-mail /
Of course I don't agree 100% with him but some things are true...

Default rule in Order type dependend parameters - OPL8 - Order Settlement

Hello,
We are doing settlement of production orders via Tcode - Ko88.
After execution of the same, system is passing an FI entry to GL - which is mentioned in the Material Master (Valuation Class - 7900) i.e. through OBYC setting.
We have also checked the OPL8 setting (Order Type dependend Parameters - Controlling Tab) in which "Default Rule" is mentioned as - PP1 - Production Material full Settlement.
As the system is passing an entry via "Default Rule - PP1" stored in Order Type Dependend Paramenters:
1. What is the use of Settlement Profile (OKO7) & Allocation Structure (OKO6)?
2. Can we make "Default Rule" field as optional (In Tcode - OPL8) ? since all the settlements are resulting in same Material GL.
Waiting for a positive answer. Points will be assigned definitly.
Thanks & Regards,
Shridhar Sawant

Hi,
Settlement Profile:
In the settlement profile, you define a range of control parameters for settlement. You must define the settlement profile before you can enter a settlement rule for a sender.
If you want to settle the costs each time to just one cost center or just one G/L account, you need a settlement profile. As you cannot maintain the settlement parameters during settlement to a receiver, you must save the settlement profile either in the order type or in the model order or reference order.
Allocation Structure:
During settlement, costs incurred under the primary and secondary cost elements by a sender are allocated to one or more receivers. When you settle by cost element, you settle using the appropriate original cost element.
An allocation structure comprises one or several settlement assignments. An assignment shows which costs (origin: cost element groups from debit cost elements) are to be settled to which receiver type (for example, cost center, order, and so on).
You have two alternatives in settlement assignment:
You assign the debit cost element groups to a settlement cost element.
You settle by cost element - that is, the debit cost element is the settlement cost element.
This is a good idea, for example, if the required capital spending for an asset you are building yourself is to be monitored. These costs are settled by cost element to an inventory account in Asset Accounting at the end of the year, or when the measure is complete.
Each allocation structure must fulfil the following criteria:
Completeness
An allocation structure is assigned to each object to be settled. All cost elements in which costs are incurred, must be represented in the appropriate allocation structure.
Uniqueness
Each cost element in which costs are incurred may only appear once in an allocation structure. Only one settlement cost element may be assigned to a source within a particular allocation structure.
Source Structure:
A source structure contains several source assignments, each of which contains the individual cost elements or cost element intervals to be settled using the same distribution rules.
In the settlement rule for the sender you can define one distribution rule, in which you specify the distribution and receivers for the costs for each source assignment.
Thanks,
Rau

Defaulting Rule not working for Order Currency

Hi,
We have a requirement where we need to have defaulting currency as SEK for one of the Sweden customer. We have set the defaulting rules for the same but doesn't seem to work. Any suggestions will help..
Thanks in Advance.

Hi,
You have like this:
1. Price list
2.OE_DEFAULT_PVT.Get_SOB_Currency_Code
You have to make
1. XXOE_DEFAULT_PVT.custom_code
2. Price list
3.OE_DEFAULT_PVT.Get_SOB_Currency_Code
Did you made own custom code to pick currency?
Regards,
Luko

Deployment Rule Set broken with Java 7u55

Hello!
I'm using Deployment Rule Set in my company environment, its signed by code signing certificate that is given out by internal CA. After I upgraded to Java 7u55, the Deployment Rule Set does not recognize older statically installed Java version.
Versions I have:
7u45 - install directory: C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.7.0_45
7u51 - install directory: C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.7.0_51
7u55 - install directory: C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.7.0_55 or C:\Program Files\Java\jre7\ - neither does not work
When I go to site described in Ruleset and that has to use Java 7u45, then I receive an message "Deployment Rule Set required Java version 1.7.0_45 not available. In the same way it doesn't recognize 1.7.0.51 or even Java version 6.
When I uninstall Java 7u55, everthing works fine again.
My ruleset looks like this:
<ruleset version="1.0+">
     <rule>
          <id location="first.site.com" />
          <action permission="run" version="1.7.0_45" />
     </rule>
     <rule>
          <id location="second.site.com" />
          <action permission="run" version="1.7.0_51" />
     </rule>
     <rule
          <id />
          <action permission="default" />
     </rule>
</ruleset>
Anyone knows what's wrong or is it a bug?

costlow - I disagree. If I'm using IE, then I only need the internal certficate used to sign the jar to be also insalled on the machine in question in the windows CA Certs store. If the cert was the issue, why does it work with 7u51. If it was a bad cert, it should fail with every version. Plus, I think the pop up has a different error message if it has a cert issue.
I'm having the exact same issue as the OP described and it all started with 7u55. Here's what I've found:
- With 7u55 or 7u60 installed, the error will come up rergardless of what prior version is being requested.
- If 7u51 is the latest installed, it works
- If 8u05 is installed with 7u55 and/or 7u60, it works
- If I install the 7u60 EA b15, it works
Something in the final release is being added that blocks this functionality, but for some odd reason only in the 7 family starting with 7u55.
Any insight you could give would be very helpful. In the meantime, I am deploying 8u05 to cover this up, but it does pose issues for some apps that don't work with the new 8 family plugin.

GRC53 Rule Set Migrated into GRC10

Gurus, has anyone encountered the following situation. We migrated our 53 rule set into GRC 10 using the Migration Tool. On the surface all of the rule objects seem to move across as they should. We then began to run our risk reports. We noticed that for the same user, in the same backend ECC system, we get varying results from our 53 Rule Set which is in our GRC10 system vs the 5.3 Rule Set executed from our old 5.3 system. We see more violations returned from our old 5.3 system; entire risks are not reported from the GRC10 system.
Consequently, I began reviewing the functions (actions/permissions). I picked a specific risk that was returned by the 5.3 system and reviewed it, line by line - comparing the 53 Rule Set in GRC10 against the 53 Rule Set in the 5.3 system. Everything lined up, with the exception of the activity values. In the 53 Rule Set that was migrated into GRC10 the activity values are single digits (1,2,5, etc) where as in the 5.3 System the activates are two digits (01, 02, 05, etc), Since the values are mainatined in SAP as double digits, could this be causing this? I would hope this is not the culprit, but I am unsure where else to turn.
I will say for those risks that were returned in the results, the activities in those functions were single digits as well.

Hi Penn,
Can you check if your default SoD risk level is "Critical" and hence all the conflicts are not being thrown in 10.0
There is an SAP Note 1632864 where you need to maintain parameter 1024 and se tthe default risk level to High. Since there is no option of All in 10.0 similar to 5.3
Thanks and Best Regards,
Srihari.K

Risk Analysis at user level shows nothing in all 3 views though at role level shows risks of global rule set

I am configuring ARA 10.1 for a ECC 6.0 plug in development system and facing this issue. Risk Analysis at user level shows no data in all 3 views though at role level shows risks of global rule set. I am using Global rule set. I generated all risks/functions & using connector group as SAP_ECCS_LG not SAP_R3_LG.I activated common, R/3 & ECCS BC sets. Added integration scenario for AUTH. Run all 4 sync jobs multiple times successfully. My system already has decentralised EAM 10.1 implemented & even used in production as BAU. I have checked at both chrome & IE. The misleading thing is that RFC is also working fine & I can see risks in Risk Analysis at role level & risky roles are even assigned to valid users.GRC is at SP4 & accordingly is the ECC 6.0 plug in. Thanks in Advance. Please consider it urgent.

Hi,
Assign ECC connector to SAP_ECCS_LG group.
Run the programs GRAC_PFCG_AUTHORIZATION_SYNCand GRAC_REPOSITORY_OBJECT_SYNC) in full synch mode(this might take time so better do this in background). Better do it sequentially.Check the logs of the jobs in SLG1 just to ensure everythings fine.
Run ARA for a specific user and mention the connector for faster output. Ensure this user has the role with risks.Also as explained earlier check the GUID against user id in table GRACUSERROLE and using GRACROLE you can find out the technical name of the role updated in the table. This should be same as the backend role.
Then run ARA and while doing so please ensure the selection screen doesnt have any unwanted default inputs. If followed correctly , this should be of help. I am assuming the role analysis yielded correct risks as configured since this would mean that connector have correct actions and basic config is in place.
Regards,
Vivek

CC / RAR 5.2 - Multiple Rule Set Question

How does the system handle the use of multiple rule sets in CC / RAR 5.2?
For example, letu2019s say I want to keep a standard SAP rule set in tact to use for testing and comparison in RAR, but I also want to load another one.
I realize that only 1 can be the u201CDEFAULTu201D so what does that mean? I know that a risk analysis is only run against the rule set you set as default. I also know that you can select the rule set to use in processing when you manually run either through Informer or Configuration tab a risk analysis. What I am really concerned with is what happens if you take the results to u201Cmanagement reportsu201D from 2 different rule sets?
First, can you even do it?
Second, if you can, then I think you must have to come up with a different RISKID configuration schema for each rule set otherwise, I do not see how you can differentiate from which rule set the violation is generated. That said, you will also need to export the report information into Excel and make any u201Crule set sortu201D there as I donu2019t see a way to do it directly in RARu2026.maybe a future improvement?
Can anyone confirm the impact of multiple rule sets and how you manage them?
Regards,
Greg

Greg,
You can maintain the different severity levels for different Rule Sets. For example, in one Rule Set you can keep the "Critical" Risks and in other you can keep "High", "Medium" & "Low". Run your analysis against first Rule Set if you want to know the "Critical" Risks and second Rule set you can use for rest of the severity levels. I hope this way you can manage your multiple Rule Sets in RAR.
Thanks,
Tavi
SAP Security & GRC Consultant.

How do I change the default ruler style settings

I'm very frustrated with the lack of margins in the default ruler settings in cocoa apps. I would MUCH rather have the ability to set my defualt ruler settings including margins, font, size, etc. rather than reset them every time I create a new document. Is this possible? How?
Thanks so much.
Varen

"Cocoa apps" is too broad a category - so the answer to that is "no". There's no system-wide setting for document formatting.
But you may be able to do it for individual apps if you tell us which ones you are using. And even if there is no way to set a preference for a particular app, in general you can create a blank document with the formatting that you want, save it someplace convenient, then in the Finder right-click it, choose "Get Info" and check the "Stationary Pad" option. Then whenever you double-click that document, you'll get a new document with those same settings.
That works with TextEdit, but you need to type a little bit of text for the new margins to stick (for some reason the margins reset to 0 if you leave the document blank).

Deployment Rule Sets do not properly launch the latest available version from the JRE6 family when the jpi-version is specified by the RIA

Issue Summary
In Java 1.7 Update 71, Java 1.7 Update 72 and Java 1.8 Update 25 Deployment Rule Sets do not properly launch the latest available version from the JRE6 family when the jpi-version is specified by the RIA. We've noticed this with Oracle Forms and Reports 11g where we have forms that specify Java 1.6 Update 20. We used to be able to specify Java 1.6 Update 26 in our Ruleset, but now the only version a that works in our ruleset is Java 1.6 Update 20 which is the same version requested by the JPI-Version attribute of the jar. The long term solution would be to upgrade Oracle Forms and Reports, however this isn't currently in the cards.
RuleSet.xml Test
Ruleset.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
<ruleset version="1.0+">
<rule>
   <id location="*.javatester.org" />
   <action permission="run" version="1.6*" />
</rule>
<ruleset version="1.0+">
<rule>
   <id location="*.internaldomain.name" />
   <action permission="run" version="1.6*" />
</rule>
</ruleset>
Test 1 (Control)
Installed Java Versions:
– 1.7 Update 51 b13 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
– 1.6 Update 26 b03 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
Deployment Ruleset works as expected for both URLs
Test 2
Installed Java Versions:
– 1.7 Update 72 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
– 1.6 Update 26 b03 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
The RuleSet works for JavaTester.org however on internaldomain.name we get the following error:
With the trace logging turned on, I suspected the version attribute supplied by the RIA. I was able to trick Java by adding the following to my system deployment.properties file:
deployment.javaws.jre.0.product=1.6.0_20
deployment.javaws.jre.0.path=C\:\\Program Files (x86)\\Java\\jre6\\bin\\javaw.exe
deployment.javaws.jre.0.enabled=true
Because the RIA requests 1.6.0_20 it matches 1.6* from the deployment ruleset sooner than 1.6.0_26. However, if 1.6.0_20 is not available 1.6.0_26 should match according to the Deployment Rule Set documentation:
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/jweb/security/deployment_rules.html
The version of the JRE that is used is determined by the following order of precedence:
1. The current version of the JRE is used if it is available and matches both the version attribute and the version requested by the RIA.
2. The latest available version of the JRE is used if it matches both the version attribute and the version requested by the RIA.
3. The current version of the JRE is used if it is available and matches the version attribute.
4. The latest available version of the JRE is used if it matches the version attribute.
If no version is available that meets the criteria, then the RIA is blocked, and a message is shown to the user. To provide a custom message, include the message element.
As a result:
If Java 1.6.0_20 is listed in the version requested by the RIA and 1.6.0_20 is listed in the deployment.properties file, #1 matches.
If Java 1.6.0_20 is listed in the version requested by the RIA, but 1.6.0_20 is NOT listed in the deployment.properties file the #1 SHOULD match, but doesn’t. It used to match up-to and including JRE 1.7 Update 51 however the ruleset appears to no longer match in subsequent versions.
#2 should never match with our current Deployment Ruleset. It would match if we specified 1.7* as a version in the Ruleset.xml.
#3 used to be broken as well after JRE 1.7 Update 51 however this bug has been marked as fixed. See: http://bugs.java.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8032781
I have reproduced this issue with Java 1.7 Update 71, Java 1.7 Update 72, and Java 1.8 Update 25 when one of these versions are installed with Java 1.6 Update 26.

I can't seem to edit this post anymore, for some odd reason.
So here goes;
I found this post in NVIDIA's knowledge base;
When installing an after-market graphics card into a certified Windows 8 PC with UEFI enabled, the s...
The interesting parts in this post are as follows;
When an after-market graphics card is installed into a motherboard with UEFI enabled in the system BIOS, or if the system is a certified Windows 8 PC with Secure Boot enabled, the system may not boot.
UEFI is a new system BIOS feature that is provided on most new motherboards. A UEFI system BIOS is required in order for the Windows 8 Secure Boot feature to work. Secure boot is enabled by default on certified Windows 8 PCs.
In order to get the PC to boot with a graphics card that does not contain UEFI firmware, the end-user must first disable the secure boot feature in the system's SBIOS before installing the graphics card.
Note: Some system SBIOS's incorporate a feature called compatibility boot. These systems will detect a non-UEFI-enabled firmware VBIOS and allow the user to disable secure boot and then proceed with a compatibility boot. If the system contains a system SBIOS the supports compatibility boot, the user will need to disable secure boot when asked during boot process
This leads me to believe that the BIOS update that wrecked my setup was 9SKT58A/9SJT58A, which only contains one change;
"Adds support for updating BIOS from a WIN7 BIOS to a WIN8 BIOS".
I've just ordered a cheap UEFI-compatible GT640 from Gainward, so I hope I'll be able to try that out this weekend.

Default Rule Set

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for